Daily Archives: February 6, 2017

Artificial Intelligence Tops Humans in Poker Battle What’s the Big Deal? – PokerNews.com

Posted: February 6, 2017 at 3:21 pm

HomeNewsPokerNews Op-Ed

Deep Blue was one hell of a chess player.

It was February 1996 and the machine developed by IBM was locked in battle with Gary Kasparov. Chess was big news as the computer system project originally begun in 1985 at Carnegie Mellon University attempted to do something other chess-playing devices had been unable to do beat a reigning world champion.

Even those with only a passing interest in chess like myself were intrigued by the matchup. Deep Blues designer said the machine could evaluate 200 million positions per second, and at the time, it was the fastest computer to match up with a world chess champion. Reports on the days progress were published in newspapers all across the globe.

Ultimately, the first match of six games was a victory for humanitywith Kasparov notching a 4-2 victory. However, in May the following year, and after some additional re-engineering, it was Deep Blue coming out on top.

The Deep Blue phenomenon has been in my head for the last couple weeks as four top poker players (Jason Les, Daniel McAulay, Jimmy Chou and Dong Kim) squared off against artificial intelligence software at the Rivers Casino in Pittsburgh.

This time the AI came out on top.

As Reuters noted, Libratus [Latin for balance], an AI built by Carnegie Mellon University racked up over $1.7 million worth of chips against four of the top professional poker players in the world in a 20-day marathon poker tournament that ended on Tuesday.

Headlines have trumpeted Libratus accomplishment around the world. Here are just a few examples:

Machine beats humans for the first time in poker (Reuter's) Computer manages to beat 4 of world's best poker players (FOX News) A Computer Just Clobbered Four Pros At Poker (FiveThirtyEight) A Mystery AI Just Crushed the Best Human Players at Poker (Wired magazine) Artificial Intelligence Goes All-in on Texas Holdem (Wall Street Journal)

Developers compared the victory to that of Deep Blue 20 years ago. The team certainly faced a challenge in engineering their AI to adjust to betting differences, imperfect information, unorthodox play, and that unique aspect of poker that differs it from most other games,bluffing.

Players were given a certain amount of play money and Libratus would go on to notch a computer's first victory in the no limit variety of Texas Hold'em (a previous computer had already mastered Limit Hold'em).

Yes, poker is just a game," University of Michigan professor Michael Wellman, who specializes in game theory and closely follows AI poker, said to Wired magazine. "But the game theory exhibited by Libratus could help with everything from financial trading to political negotiations to auctions.

Some have hailed the entire spectacle as great for the game of poker and no doubt there is some nice PR benefit that comes with it. But from a simple poker-playing perspective and in regards to its relevance among poker fans, the whole thing seems a bit too much. As a massive fan of the game of poker, this whole spectacle lacks the impact of Deep Blues win.

To me, this matchup of man versus droid/computer/software/techno-gizmo lacks the one aspect of poker that makes it so unique:risk. Its the reason that playing poker online for free or playing with your grandmother for matchsticks (or cheerios or whatever) is so lame;there is no risk of losing ones own money.

Chess is a game with merely risk of losing one individual match itself. The two combatants may have some kind of extrinsic monetary motivation, such as tournament payouts, appearance fees, etc., but there is not an inherent expected loss of ones own personal earnings.

In poker, players must square off against each other with their (usually) hard-earned money and that risk of ones own cash is a huge part of pokers appeal. Financial risk is inherently about losing money, and if youre not playing with risk in the game, youre not really playing poker.

If youre afraid to lose your money, you cant play to win, said Johnny Moss, a Texas poker legend and winner of the first two WSOP Main Events.

That attitude is something inherently flawed in making so much hoopla about Libratus' accomplishment;a machine/software/robot has no real inherent sense of loss or risk.

And when it comes to the art of the bluff, it seems engineering a machine to make these kinds of moves misses the key component of the risk involved in doing this: the pulse-racing feel of having all your chips in on a pot when you know your hand is squadoosh as ESPN WSOP analyst Norman Chad likes to put it. A highly-engineered AI topped four poker sharks with no real money on the line.

As a poker fan, this whole event doesnt even seem like real poker and just left me asking: So what? Poker is a game that is extremely dependent on human emotion and temperament.

Artificial intelligence has no fears about losing the mortgage payment in a pot.

Artificial intelligence has no fears about losing the mortgage payment in a pot or being down to that last bit of the poker bankroll and having to look for a real job to build it back.

Another aspect of this matchup with Libratus that is really missing for me, and I think for many poker fans, is that the self-reliant, mano-a-mano, battle of minds that takes place at the poker table. Sure I can concede a machine can get the better of humans in this type of setup, but pokers appeal for me is seeing players squaring off against each other and matching skills.

A battle against a computer lacks the panache of seeing real-life humans battling it out for their own cash. Libratus may have massive amounts of computing power, but it lacks the humanity that makes poker great and now watchable on television.

Many poker insiders and those with deep roots in the game may forget that, to casual fans, seeing thousands of dollars won and lost on a single game of cards is extremely bizarre yet extremely appealing. That appeal, along with the games unique characters and history, is the reason poker has grown into the international game it is today.

Poker is great because the human aspect is so important to excelling; it is not simply a series of moves on a game board or your old Commodore 64. Players who master the game can read other players and keep their own emotions in check.

They must master the subtleties and games within the game to excel. They benefit themselves by timing their actions correctly based on other players tendencies, outlooks and general gameplay. Players like Jason Mercier and Daniel Negreanu have mastered these nuances.

Dont read my hand wrong here, I am not a poker pessimist who thinks the game is moving in the wrong direction. Quite the contrary: I think the game is moving in the right direction in general after massive growth in the 2000s.

Libratus is not the next Big Blue and these four players were not Gary Kasparov.

Actual growth of the game depends on continuing presentations of the game in its real context on the felt and focusing on the players.

Some of those include: continued growth of the WSOP and live ESPN broadcasts; the World Poker Tours continued success and international growth; great broadcasts like Poker Centrals Super High Roller Bowl (with great commentary catering to fans and hard-core players alike); progress (thought slow) of state-by-state legalized online poker; the growth of the game by appealing younger players via Twitch; and the success of middle-tier tours catering to average Joe poker players (which are still needed to grow the game) like the Heartland Poker Tour and Mid-States Poker Tour.

The AI win seems like a minute footnote in comparison. Libratus may have won the battle against mankind, but was there ever really a war? Im not sure this is a battle that means a whole lot in the big picture of modern poker.

Libratus may have won the battle against mankind, but was there ever really a war?

Libratus is not the next Big Blue and these four players were not Gary Kasparov. It may have been an interesting technological endeavor, but Im sure these players in the "Brains vs. Artificial Intelligence, as the event came to be known, would much rather bring home a WSOP gold bracelet or WPT title if they had to pick. That hardware (not software) would be tangible and real and it would certainly be a nice real-life check to cash.

Sean Chaffin is a freelance writer in Crandall, Texas, and writes frequently about gambling and poker. If you have any story ideas, please email him at seanchaffin@sbcglobal.net or follow him @PokerTraditions. His poker book is RAISING THE STAKES: True Tales of Gambling, Wagering & Poker Faces and available on amazon.com.

The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions PokerNews

Be sure to complete your PokerNews experience by checking out an overview of our mobile and tablet apps here. Stay on top of the poker world from your phone with our mobile iOS and Android app, or fire up our iPad app on your tablet. You can also update your own chip counts from poker tournaments around the world with MyStack on both Android and iOS.

Go here to read the rest:

Artificial Intelligence Tops Humans in Poker Battle What's the Big Deal? - PokerNews.com

Posted in Artificial Intelligence | Comments Off on Artificial Intelligence Tops Humans in Poker Battle What’s the Big Deal? – PokerNews.com

Is AI a Threat to Christianity? – The Atlantic

Posted: at 3:21 pm

In his relatively short tenure, Pope Francis has been hard at work welcoming spiritual seekers into the Catholic Church. Hes refused to judge LGBT people, sought to integrate divorced couples, and extended priests ability to forgive abortion. But Franciss wide arms have arguably never stretched further than a mass in 2014 when he suggested the church would baptize Martians.

Iffor exampletomorrow an expedition of Martians came and one says, But I want to be baptized! What would happen? Pope Francis asked. When the Lord shows us the way, who are we to say, No, Lord, it is not prudent! No, lets do it this way.

While playful, this odd scenario got at a serious question about just how far the churchs welcome can go. Should Christianity, the worlds largest religion, embrace all intelligent life? Even aliens? Granted, the arrival of green space creatures seeking salvation isnt very likely. But the Popes lesson opens the door to the acceptance of another science-fiction stalwart, tooone thats not so easily dismissed. Namely, hyper-intelligent machines.

While most theologians arent paying it much attention, some technologists are convinced that artificial intelligence is on an inevitable path toward autonomy. How far away this may be depends on whom you ask, but the trajectory raises some fundamental questions for Christianityas well as religion broadly conceived, though for this article Im going to stick to the faith tradition I know best. In fact, AI may be the greatest threat to Christian theology since Charles Darwins On the Origin of Species.

For decades, artificial intelligence has been advancing at breakneck speed. Today, computers can fly planes, interpret X-rays, and sift through forensic evidence; algorithms can paint masterpiece artworks and compose symphonies in the style of Bach. Google is developing artificial moral reasoning so that its driverless cars can make decisions about potential accidents.

AI is already here, its real, its quickening, says Kevin Kelly, a co-founder of Wired magazine and the author of The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future. I think the formula for the next 10,000 start-ups is to take something that already exists and add AI to it.

Despite AIs promise, certain thinkers are deeply concerned about a time when machines might become fully sentient, rational agentsbeings with emotions, consciousness, and self-awareness. The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race, Stephen Hawking told the BBC in 2014. Once humans develop artificial intelligence, it would take off on its own, and redesign itself at an ever-increasing rate. Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete and would be superseded."

This explosion of artificial intelligenceoften referred to as the singularityis one of many futures technologists have envisioned for robots, not all so apocalyptic. But the possibility of any threat to humans, even if small, is real enough that some are advocating for precautionary measures. More than 8,000 people, including Hawking, Noam Chomsky, and Elon Musk, have signed an open letter warning against potential pitfalls of AI development. Ryan Calo, a Washington University law professor, argues for the development of a Federal Robotics Commission to monitor and regulate developments so that we dont innovate irresponsibly.

While concerns mostly center on economics, government, and ethics, theres also a spiritual dimension to what were making, Kelly argues. If you create other things that think for themselves, a serious theological disruption will occur.

History lends credibility to this prediction, given that many major scientific advances have had religious impacts. When Galileo promoted heliocentrism in the 1600s, it famously challenged traditional Christian interpretations of certain Bible passages, which seemed to teach that the earth was the center of the universe. When Charles Darwin popularized the theory of natural selection in the 1800s, it challenged traditional Christian beliefs about the origins of life. The trend has continued with modern genetics and climatology.

The creation of non-human autonomous robots would disrupt religion, like everything else, on an entirely new scale. "If humans were to create free-willed beings, says Kelly, who was raised Catholic and identifies as a Christian, absolutely every single aspect of traditional theology would be challenged and have to be reinterpreted in some capacity.

Take the soul, for instance. Christians have mostly understood the soul to be a uniquely human element, an internal and eternal component that animates our spiritual sides. The notion originates from the creation narrative in the biblical book of Genesis, where God created human beings in Gods own image. In the story, God forms Adam, the first human, out of dust and breathes life into his nostrils to make him, literally, a living soul. Christians believe that all humans since that time similarly possess Gods image and a soul.

But what exactly is a soul? St. Augustine, the early Christian philosopher, once observed that I have therefore found nothing certain about the origin of the soul in the canonical scriptures. And Mike McHargue, a self-described Christian mystic and author of Finding God in the Waves: How I Lost my Faith and Found it Again Through Science, believes that the rise of AI would draw out the ambiguities in the ways that many Christians have defined terms like consciousness and soul.

Those in religious contexts dont know precisely what a soul is, McHargue says. Weve understood it to be some non-physical essence of an individual thats not dependent upon or tied to their body. Would AI have a soul by that definition?

If this seems like an absurd question, consider technologies such as in vitro fertilization and genetic cloning. Intelligent life is created by humans in each case, but presumably many Christians would agree that those beings have a soul. If you have a soul and you create a physical copy of yourself, you assume your physical copy also has a soul, says McHargue. But if we learn to digitally encode a human brain, then AI would be a digital version of ourselves. If you create a digital copy, does your digital copy also have a soul?

If youre willing to follow this line of reasoning, theological challenges amass. If artificially intelligent machines have a soul, would they be able to establish a relationship with God? The Bible teaches that Jesuss death redeemed all things in creationfrom ants to accountantsand made reconciliation with God possible. So did Jesus die for artificial intelligence, too? Can AI be saved?

I dont see Christs redemption limited to human beings, Christopher Benek, an associate pastor at Providence Presbyterian Church in Florida with degrees from Princeton Theological Seminary, told Gizmodo in 2015. Its redemption of all of creation, even AI. If AI is autonomous, then we should encourage it to participate in Christs redemptive purposes in the world.

And what about sin? Christians have traditionally taught that sin prevents divine relationship by somehow creating a barrier between fallible humans and a holy God. Say in the robot future, instead of eradicating humans, the machines decideor have it hardwired somewhere deep inside themthat never committing evil acts is the ultimate good. Would artificially intelligent beings be better Christians than humans are? And how would this impact the Christian view of human depravity?

These questions so far concern religious belief, but there is also the many matters related to religious practice. If Christians accept that all creation is intended to glorify God, how would AI do such a thing? Would AI attend church, sing hymns, care for the poor? Would it pray?

James McGrath, a professor of religion at Butler University and the author of Theology and Science Fiction, recently toyed with the prayer question using a strange classroom assignment. He told his religion students to ask Siri, the personal assistant in Apple devices, to pray for them and observe what happened. The students quickly learned that Siri was more comfortable with questions like What is prayer? than commands like Pray for me. When directed to pray, Siri basically responded, Im not programmed to do that. But if a more advanced version Siri were programmed to pray, would such an action be valuable? Does God receive prayers from any intelligent beingor just human intelligence?

There are no easy answers for Christians willing to entertain these questions. And, certainly, theres a case to be made that Christians shouldnt bother in the first place. The Christian Bible never anticipates non-human intelligence, much less addresses the questions and concern it creates. It does, however, teach that God has established a special relationship with humans that is unique among all creatures. Russell Bjork, a professor at the evangelical Gordon College who is cautious about broadening the Christian understanding of personhood to include AI, argues in the journal Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, What makes humans special is not what humanity is, but rather it is Gods relationship to us based on his purpose for making us.

In addition to the Bible, many Christians look to their ancient creeds for guidance. One of the most popular, the Nicene Creed, speaks of Jesus as the only son of God, begotten, not made. The implicit corollary is that humans are Gods children who are made, not begotten. Christians believe that God makes humans, but humans make machines. By this logic, one might conclude that AI could not be considered Gods children or possess soul.

But this hasnt stopped Kevin Kelly from beginning to advocate for the development of a catechism for robots. A catechism is a statement of faith usually framed in a question-and-answer format that outlines orthodox belief and is typically taught to children in some religious traditions. Kelly says he takes the idea very seriously and even suggested it in a keynote talk at Q conference, an annual gathering of more than 1,000 prominent Christian leaders.

There will be a point in the future when these free-willed beings that weve made will say to us, I believe in God. What do I do? At that point, we should have a response, Kelly says.

Kelly, McHargue, and McGrath all are convinced that most traditional theologians today arent engaged enough in conversations like this because theyre stuck rehashing old questions instead of focusing on the coming ones. McHargue notes that questions about AI and theology are some of the most common that he receives from listeners of his popular Ask Science Mike and The Liturgist podcasts. Any non-biological, non-human intelligence will present a greater challenge to religion and human philosophy than anything else in our entire history combine, he claims. Nothing else will raise that level of upheaval, and collective trauma as the moment we first encounter it.

Despite these pitfalls, McGrath raises one last mischievous point: AI actually could bolster a persons faith. For some people, religion is precisely about recognizing that I, as a human being, am not God and so I don't have all the answers and will inevitably be wrong about things, he says. If that is ones outlook, then finding out you were wrong is a good thing. It simply confirms what you already knew: that life is about trusting God and not trusting in my own understanding.

Go here to see the original:

Is AI a Threat to Christianity? - The Atlantic

Posted in Artificial Intelligence | Comments Off on Is AI a Threat to Christianity? – The Atlantic

3 former Cowboys ready to fight for immortality in Super Bowl LI – Cowboys Wire

Posted: at 3:19 pm

A team never knows ifthey are giving up on a player too soon. Whether because of injury, logjam at the position or just not enough performance, teams walk away from players without knowing what more they are capable of. For the Cowboys, three such players have survived and thrived without them, poised to try and win a Super Bowl on Sunday in Houston.

In 2008, Dallas continued itstradition of drafting complements to future Hall of Famer Jason Witten at the tight end position. This time it was Texas A&Ms Martellus Bennett. Bennett was an athletic marvel but never gave full effort into development. He would later admit a great deal of frustration with his role and figuring out he would never get the chance to be the lead dog with Witten in Dallas. He played out his rookie deal, went to New York and then Chicago and proved he was an upper tier talent at the position.

Talent was never his problem, and at each of the last two stops he proved to those teams his attitude rendered his talent notworth the trouble. Of course, at Reclamation University, Bill Belichick had a perfect plan for him. Bennett was brought in as Rob Gronkowskis complement to replace Aaron Hernandez, but in an offense that knows how to feature two tight ends. When Gronkowski was lost for the year, Bennett slid right into the No. 1 role seamlessly. Hes no Gronk, but he should be featured Sunday evening.

That same year Bennett was drafted, the Cowboyssigned a diminutive and shifty wideout from Texas Tech by the name of Danny Amendola.

That year, the Cowboys were featured on Hard Knocks and the football viewing public fell in love with the 5-foot-8, 183 pound receiver with just 4.68 speed. Amendola made it to final cuts but was released.

He signed with the Cowboys practice squad but took an opportunity to go to camp with the Philadelphia Eagles the next season. Amendola was placed on their practice squad originally as well.

St. Louisneeded wideout help midseason and Amendola got his chance. He played 14 games and caught 43 passes. A few years later, New England was scooping him up as a understudy to Wes Welker. Amendola has become a major contributor for the Patriots, sliding in and out of the starting lineup but always making his presence known with Tom Brady.

Atlanta isnt without former Cowboys as well. Last year, the Dallas secondary was inept at best. They didnt record an interception on the season until late in the season. A practice squad call up by the name of Deji Olatoye did the honors. Still, it wasnt enough to keep him in Dallas, and he spent most of 2016 on the Falcons practice squad.

Hes not a key part of their defense, but he played in five games down the stretch and has gotten action in each of their playoff games.

It happens to every team in the NFL. They think someone can no longer help their team and once in a different role for a different coach, the player finds a niche. Its not a sign of a bad front office, stuff like that just happens. Still, it means plenty of current Cowboys players are going to be sitting at home watching former teammates get their opportunity at immortality.

See more here:

3 former Cowboys ready to fight for immortality in Super Bowl LI - Cowboys Wire

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on 3 former Cowboys ready to fight for immortality in Super Bowl LI – Cowboys Wire

Jeff Jacobs: Near NFL Immortality, Tom Brady Shows Human Side – Hartford Courant

Posted: at 3:19 pm

We saw him laugh this Super Bowl week and we saw him cry. The closer Tom Brady has drawn to superhuman achievement, the more human he became to us.

The closer he has drawn to football immortality, the more he appeared to embrace his mortality.

On the cusp of becoming the first quarterback in history to win five Super Bowl titles, never has he been more compelling.

Brady never has been the braggart, never been the bumptious boor. Yet in his humility and good nature, neither has he opened the vault to his emotions. If you cut the Patriots quarterback, he did not bleed. If you pressed him, he smiled and deferred.

He usually has spoken in the moment and as if he needed to hurry off to a meeting with Bill Belichick. Reflection rarely was in the cards. We have known more about the unique diet that fills his stomach than the deeper feelings that fill his heart.

And then a 7-year-old boy named Joseph Duarte, who had won a contest to be a Super Bowl reporter, asked Tom Brady a question Monday night at Minute Maid Park.

Who's your hero?

The rules for this Super Bowl week changed right there.

"That's a great question," Brady said. "I think my dad is my hero because he's someone I looked up to every day and, ah my dad."

Brady, to the astonishment of hundreds of reporters, started to choke up.

The thought of his son accepting the Lombardi Trophy from commissioner Roger Goodell at NGR Stadium did not thrill Tom Brady Sr. Still upset with all the ramifications of Deflategate, he told a San Francisco television station recently that anyone "that has Roger Goodell's ethics doesn't belong on any stage that Tom Brady is on."

"He went on a witch hunt and went in way over his head and had to lie his way out in numerous ways," Brady Sr. said.

He said it is a different story when charges of cheating and deceit are leveled against your son or daughter. He said he'd rather take the arrows to his heart than have his kids absorb them. And while many of us have different views of what happened with those deflated footballs, every parent can identify with Mr. Brady's paternal instincts. The sentiment seemed to touch his son's heart, even if he didn't want to publicly subscribe to his father's harsh, harsh words.

"I'd say my dad represents his feelings," he said. "He's a dad, and I'm a dad, and, ah "

Brady began to tear up again. Later he talked about how his father had always supported him, came home at night after work to hit him grounders and fly balls. How he loved to go to 49ers games with dad and mom and throw the football in the parking lot outside Candlestick Park.

This was a Brady we had rarely seen and, it turns out, we only knew half of the story. Reports surfaced Tuesday that Brady's mom, Galynn, has been ill for 18 months. His dad has been to only one game this season, his mom none. They are expected to be at NRG Stadium Sunday.

"It's just been a tough year," Brady said. "Every family goes through different things and my family's always been a great support system for my entire life.

"I'm hoping my mom can make the game."

Sending out an Instagram photo Saturday night of his dad and him kissing Galynn at NRG Stadium, Brady made it clear his mom would be at the game.

We see the handsome face and the pinpoint passes and the remarkable poise in the pocket. We see the mansion and his supermodel wife. And we project a perfect life on him. It isn't fair, of course, for no life is perfect.

As we listen to Brady speak for at least three hours over four days, listen to him talk about his mom and dad, talk about how Gisele is the one who does everything for the kids, from 6 a.m to 6 p.m., every day for six months, reminisce about buddies from the past, talk movingly about how Robert Kraft is a second father to him We see him laugh. We see him cry. We see Tom Brady.

Yes, he has been to the Super Bowl seven times. Yes, he and Bill Belichick have formed the ultimate coach-player combination. Everyone from Troy Aikman to Jim Harbaugh is calling Brady the greatest quarterback in the history of football. And he is. Yet this week, the guy who has seemed like none of us has seemed like all of us. We came to watch for something as singular as revenge over Deflategate and instead we got a much fuller picture of a man.

From getting a chance to play at 23, through four Super Bowl titles, through seven Super Bowl appearances, through marriage and children, Brady called it a growing level of perspective. One that slapped him in the face after he missed the entire 2008 season with an injury, returned in 2009 and thought to himself, "Damn, I love this game."

"This is not a sacrifice, because I love to do it," Brady said. "There are a lot of other things that I don't get a chance to do, that when I am done playing I will get a chance to do.

"When you get to this point, walking off the practice field today, there are two quarterbacks in the world that are practicing today preparing for this game. Myself and Matt [Ryan] should feel very privileged to be able to do that. There are a lot of guys that don't have the chance and I think you do feel very humbled when you're walking off the field to say, 'Wow, we had an opportunity to go out and practice and prepare for a game that's so meaningful to all of us that we'll remember for the rest of our lives.' I feel blessed."

Even in the way he spoke of Belichick, he was more expansive. Brady talked about how Belichick has committed his life to coaching and how he has committed his life to playing. He talked about how there's no rah-rah b.s. with Belichick and how it works out between them because he's bad at taking compliments and Belichick is good at not giving many out. He said he loves the way Belichick continually challenges his team, how he likes to say, "I hope my expectation for you guys isn't more than your expectation for yourself.'"

"We're just lucky to have a confluence of situations where we wind up with the greatest coach in the history of the game and the greatest quarterback in the history of the game, keeping them together and keeping a great team around them," owner Robert Kraft said. "At least for however long the Good Lord lets me breathe, I hope they're playing and coaching."

Does vengeance play a role in this Super Bowl? It has to at some level. When you are forced to sit out a quarter of the season because of improperly inflated footballs, there has to be some lingering resentment toward the NFL. You read what Brady's father said. And while Brady said, "I'm focused on the game," Kraft said, "I think it will also be a great statement to people who are pursuing their dreams that sometimes you get treated unfairly or things don't go your way. You just hang in there."

Humans are complex. Humans harbor resentment, at least for a time. And if anything this week, Tom Brady has shown us how human he is. In the fascinating days leading up to Super Bowl LI, a game when Brady can make history, the most fascinating development was not that one side can scream about payback over footballs. It was that all sides can identify with what Tom Brady is going through with his family.

"I know where my family kind of sits at games," Brady said. "I scout that out when I have all my tickets and when I go out pregame and kind of look around I kind of know where they're going to be and I try to make some eye contact and let them know I'm looking at them.

"Yeah, this will be as special as it's ever been."

Predictions: Patriots 35, Falcons 31. Brady MVP. Goodell will try to make it seem like Deflategate never happened. Lady Gaga will make some kind of halftime political statement.

See the original post:

Jeff Jacobs: Near NFL Immortality, Tom Brady Shows Human Side - Hartford Courant

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Jeff Jacobs: Near NFL Immortality, Tom Brady Shows Human Side – Hartford Courant

Is Brain Augmentation Leading The Way To Immortality? – Wall Street Pit

Posted: at 3:19 pm

Brain implants arent anything new. In fact, several types of brain implants (also known as neuroprosthetics) are already being used. Many patients with Parkinsons disease for instance, make use of a brain implant that transmits electrical pulses to help with motor control and reduce tremors.

On a separate yet related topic, last year, the FDA approved Second Sights retinal implant which can help patients blinded by advanced retinitis pigmentosa to regain their ability to perceive shapes and motion. And then there are cochlear implants which are commonly used by deaf people or those who have trouble hearing.

Theres a common denominator about all these implants, of course. All of them are being used to help treat or manage specific medical conditions. Which, and in reference to the neuroprosthetics, makes these kinds of brain implants easily acceptable.

But thats just scratching the surface. Eventually, we will not stop being satisfied with simply using implants to restore lost or damaged functions. Why wait for something to get broken when you can just enhance it so it wont have to get broken in the first place, right? Or maybe, why not just enhance what can be enhanced so everything will simply become that much easier.

In the future, brain implants will most probably, at the very least, help us learn more quickly. Remember the movie The Matrix? Neo Keanu Reeves character simply downloaded practice from a computer and he instantly turned into a kung fu expert. Thats the kind of speed learning were talking about. Instead of taking years to become skilled at something, with the right brain implant, which can be in the form of a tiny chip a thousand times more powerful cognitively than your biological brain, it will only take a few minutes.

And then, after enhancing ones learning capabilities, next to enhance will be ones memory and concentration, and maybe even ones mood. By doing this, a person learns faster, remembers everything better, focuses better, and feels better too. And thats not so bad, right? Or is it?

Its still your brain. Its just an enhanced version. But with a computer chip in it, it will now become possible to upload your brain to the cloud. And when you die, you will continue to live on as your uploaded brain can simply be re-uploaded to someone else either some other person, or maybe a robot.

Its an extreme scenario. But with everything thats happening with our technology, progress in neuroscience and artificial intelligence, its not science fiction stuff anymore but a very real possibility. Furthermore, the process of capturing the intelligence of our brains in a machine is not a matter of if but a matter of when. So the question is, should we go to those lengths?

Even without bringing religion into the picture, theres something a bit off about tampering with the natural way the world works. Maybe thats because that is really the only alternative we know. But regardless, intervening to fix something is quite different from intervening to give someone an unfair advantage over everyone else. And isnt this exactly what nonbiological intelligence enhancement is going to result in? Unless of course everybody gets to undergo brain enhancement, then there will be a sense of fairness somehow.

But then, if everyone had super mental abilities, wheres the challenge in that? Perhaps a seriously super-advanced technological and scientific world, but can you really imagine living in a planet where everyone is a genius and everything everyone ever talks about is some kind of super-scientific or profound topic that normal people (if there will be any left that is) will not be able to understand or relate to?

And what about immortality? Who gets to decide whose brains should be uploaded and continue to live on?

We live in a troubled and complicated world. But at least, its the real world. If brain augmentation ultimately leads to everyone becoming immortal, what kind of world will we be living in? Better yet, will it still be considered living in the true sense of the word?

Were not saying progress in technology, physics, neuroscience and overall human intelligence in general fields which are unavoidably set to open up possibilities that we can scarcely imagine will negatively affect our existence. All were saying is that we just have to be a bit careful where these advancements take us as a society. But then again, and despite the risks of sounding contradictory, whos to say its not worth trying. After all, and in the words of Arthur Conan Doyle: Some believe what separates men from animals is our ability to reason. Others say its language or romantic love, or opposable thumbs. Living here in this lost world, Ive come to believe it is more than our biology. What truly makes us human is our unending search, our abiding desire for immortality.

Follow this link:

Is Brain Augmentation Leading The Way To Immortality? - Wall Street Pit

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Is Brain Augmentation Leading The Way To Immortality? – Wall Street Pit

Brian Dawkins: One day away from pro football immortality – Inside the Iggles

Posted: at 3:19 pm

Aug 6, 2016; Canton, OH, USA; General exterior view of the Pro Football Hall of Fame before the 2016 NFL Hall of Fame enshrinement at Tom Benson Hall of Fame Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

5 players Philadelphia Eagles could target in free agency by Ryan Quigley

Michael Vick officially announces retirement from NFL by Ryan Quigley

Sometimes, you dont know what you have until its gone. At other times, youre completely aware of what youre missing. Former Philadelphia Eagles safety Brian Dawkins spent more time in The City of Brotherly Love than any other athlete ever spent as a member of one of the citys sports franchises.From 1996-2008, he played his heart out and wore it on his sleeve, endearing him to fans and teammates. Hed spend the remainder of his playing days with the Denver Broncos, but he returned to his roots to sign a one-day contract, allowing him to retire as a member of the Eagles.

February 4th has a chance of being a very special day for him and for Eagles fans.

The NFL will announce its next Hall of Fame class one day before the Super Bowl, and anyone thats ever watched him play will be patiently waiting to see him take the stage. Hell be waiting to see if his name called, much like the rest of us, and he takes with him a resume that would make any NFL great jealous.

The numbers speak for themselves. Dawkins, for his career, totaled 1,131 takles, 26 sacks (from the safety position) and 37 interceptions. Add 28 forced fumbles and being able to find the end zone three times, and you have one of the most versatile players to ever play on defense.

Hes a nine-time Pro Bowler. Hes a four-time First-team All Pro, but what he truly meant to the Eagles cant be measured in statistics. No one playing for the Eagles will ever wear the number 20 again. As we mentioned before, some people seem to mean more when theyre gone, but when Dawkins left, he left a void the Eagles struggled to fill for well over ten years.

Only time will tell if they ever find a way to add another piece as valuable, as respected or as talented as this one.

Now, if that doesnt get you going, you dont have a pulse.We at Inside The Iggles salute Brian Dawkins and wish him luck. Regardless of what happens tomorrow, hes a member of our Hall of Fame forever.

Go here to see the original:

Brian Dawkins: One day away from pro football immortality - Inside the Iggles

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Brian Dawkins: One day away from pro football immortality – Inside the Iggles

‘Rick And Morty’ Theory: Rick Gifted Morty With Immortality, But Chose To Die Himself – moviepilot.com

Posted: at 3:19 pm

Rick and Morty is the fan theory equivalent of an all-you-can-eat buffet. With a universe and concept that is both expansive, self-aware, and abundant with possibilities, if you think hard enough, you'll find an explanation for almost anything that happens on the show.

A recent Reddit theory by ShadowmasterK is a prime example of this. On the face of it, the theory seems to be searching for meaning in a trait that is commonplace in all cartoons. But when you look below the surface, it begins to make sense in a way that poetically reflects the great oppositional perspective on our existence absolute purpose versus complete coincidence.

Maybe there is a god, maybe we are divine beings who share universal consciousness, maybe we're all celestial manifestations of another dimension, with this universe acting as a portal to eternal bliss. Or maybe our existence is sheer fluke, the result of billions of years of mutation that accumulated with semi-intelligent, insignificant flesh and bone hurtling through the dark abyss of space on a molten rock travelling at 1,000 miles per hour.

Wait, back to the Rick and Morty theory. ShadowmasterK believes that, in the pilot episode, when Rick injects Morty with the serum that repairs his broken legs, he also injects him with an anti-ageing serum, making Morty practically immortal. The universe canon for this lies with a dimension Rick refers to as a place where "their technology was so advanced that they had halted the ageing process and everyone there was young."

The coincidence argument, hell, the logical response to this is that characters don't age in animation anyway. But this is #RickAndMorty, a heavily meta show with a fondness for poking fun at the troupes of fiction and popular culture. This subtle reference, way back in the beginning, could well have been deliberately included by Dan Harmon and Justin Roiland.

But there's something even more interesting to take from this scene. Whether or not Rick injected Morty with the serum, Rick could stop his ageing process, but he chooses not to. The inevitability of death is something he does pay attention to, after all he did transfer his brain into a younger clone of himself in "Big Trouble In Little Sanchez," creating the high-school sensation, Tiny Rick.

"He's a little afraid he'll lose sight of who he is"

So why doesn't Rick just use the serum? The answer may be found in a Reddit AMA with co-creator Harmon, who, when asked an innocuous question on what drink is contained in Rick's flask, gave a delightful "absolute purpose" response:

"I tend to assume vodka and I know it seems unlikely that Rick wouldn't use sci-fi tech to somehow augment whatever he drinks but I think in rick's mind part of the 'addiction' to the flask of good old fashioned booze is that it anchors his identity, and I think he knows that if he augmented the booze or the flask, then why not just whip up a very rudimentary nanobiotic alcohol dispenser in his body or inject himself with a plasma component that just amounts to always having a certain blood alcohol level, and I think the reason he doesn't do that is because he's a little afraid he'll lose sight of who he is."

According to Harmon, the most intelligent man in all of existence can see the importance of maintaining his identity it's the reason he keeps the flask instead of using any number of inventions to make things easier. The same can apply to anti-ageing. Rick may feel that if he used the serum and become immortal, he may lose sight of who he truly is.

There is another difficulty, too. By being immortal (or at least not dying of natural causes) certain situations could become even more dangerous for Rick. If he did live forever, he'd be extra screwed, facing an eternity behind bars following his arrest at the end of Rick and Morty Season 2.

Or, you know, all of this is a meaningless coincidence.

Is Morty immortal? Or is this over-thinking?

(Source: Reddit)

Read the original here:

'Rick And Morty' Theory: Rick Gifted Morty With Immortality, But Chose To Die Himself - moviepilot.com

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on ‘Rick And Morty’ Theory: Rick Gifted Morty With Immortality, But Chose To Die Himself – moviepilot.com

Peroxide ingestion, promoted by alternative medicine, can be … – Science Daily

Posted: at 3:18 pm

Peroxide ingestion, promoted by alternative medicine, can be ...
Science Daily
High-concentration peroxide, sometimes promoted in alternative medicine circles for cleanses or as a so-called 'natural cure,' can lead to numerous ...

and more »

Link:

Peroxide ingestion, promoted by alternative medicine, can be ... - Science Daily

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on Peroxide ingestion, promoted by alternative medicine, can be … – Science Daily

Alternative medicine becoming more popular – WSIL TV

Posted: at 3:18 pm

CARBONDALE -- State lawmakers are considering a bill to require the regulation of naturopathic doctors in Illinois, the latest sign that alternative medicines are becoming more popular in Illinois.

The American Association of Naturopathic Physicians defines naturopathy as focusing "on holistic, proactive prevention and comprehensive diagnosis and treatment."

State Sen. Iris Y. Martinez (D-Chicago) introduced the bill to regulate naturopathic medicine. The bill, introduced on Monday, has not been assigned to a committee yet.

The Illinois Association of NaturopathicPhysicians has been pushing for the regulation of naturopathic medicine in the state.

On the group's website it explains, "Licensure will allow NDs to practice as trained, namely to diagnose and treat disease using naturopathic principles. Additionally, licensing naturopathic doctors provides for regulation of the profession and increased public safety in accessing the services of naturopathic doctors."

Regulation will also set education and training standards doctors will have to meet in order to obtain a license.

Naturopathy is part of the growing field of alternative medicine, which includes a broad range of practices, from acupuncture to yoga. Alternative medicine isalso sometimes referred to as "complementary" medicine.

17 years ago, Bonnie Juul felt like she just couldn't go on.

"I was having anxiety attacks. I couldn't sleep. I couldn't exercise without a lot of pain," said Juul.

When Juul's concerns fell on deafear, she turned to alternative medicine and found the answer.

"What it came down to was that I wasn't getting the right nutrition," she said.

Juul, who is a licensed doctor of chiropractic, now runs her own alternative medicine practice, the Natural Health Improvement Center in Carbondale, with a growing list of patients.

"I think it's because people are tired of not feeling well and they're tired of taking medications," said Juul. "Medications definitely have their place, but people also want to start taking control of their own health."

Federal health officials say one in three Americans use some form of alternative medicine, spending $30 billiona year.

When her massage therapy job became too physically taxing, Lisa Dover turned to another form of alternative medicine: yoga.

Dover said it not only made her stronger, but feel better.

"It helps us calm that mind-chatter that tends to happen and helps us to relax," said Dover, who is now a certified yoga instructor at one | o | one yoga.

But unlike yoga, some forms of alternative medicine are controversial, like medical marijuana.

Even so, alternative medicine's popularity is not likely to decline any time soon, especially since so many people swear it works.

Go here to read the rest:

Alternative medicine becoming more popular - WSIL TV

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on Alternative medicine becoming more popular – WSIL TV

Vitamin What? This Food-Based Supplement Line Might Be the Nutritional Antidote You’re Looking For – MarieClaire.com

Posted: at 3:17 pm

Courtesy, design by Betsy Farrell

For as long as you've been able to swallow pills, the procedure for taking vitamins has gone like this: Intend to tip out a single tablet; scoop up the 73 that clatter out onto floor/under the fridge. (The nutrients cancel out the non-existence of the five-second rule, yeah?) Place one on tongue, then chase aggressively with water before the coating dissolves, but the mini tsunami sends it down the wrong pipe. Thirty minutes later, intestines turn into a Tilt-A-Whirl. Think: This is how it ends.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

To recap, it's only ever gone downhill since that first gritty Flintstone chewablebut thanks to a new line of supplements, this particularly unpleasant part of a larger, mostly unpleasant experience (looking after your health) no longer has to be so...unpleasant.

Launching on Net-a-Porter today, The Nue Co. produces organic, food-based supplements with zero additives or sugarjust straight-up, highly efficient protein, probiotics, and prebiotics that are easier for your body to digest and absorb than traditional isolated vitamins. (Who even needs 500 percent vitamin C?) For example, one tablespoon of the brand's plant- or milk-protein blendsblended into a smoothie or stirred into water and taken as a shot, as founder Jules Miller preferscontains the same protein as two eggs.

Along with the assurance that you won't get that old-fashioned churn-y feeling in your stomach from taking these, The Nue Co. also delivers three boosters for de-bloating, pretty skin, and energy, the trifecta of Millennial Concerns. (The youths will be all over the turmeric-smelling complexion one, you can bet your aa bowl on it.) On top of that, each Soil Association-approved power comes in a glass jar like that which you might find at a 20th-century druggist's shop, where your birth control would be handed over with a blush and a white paper bag. Very Top Shelf-ready.

But don't let the trimmings, including an upcoming travel-inspired range, distract youthese guys *will* fill the gaps in your grudgingly responsible, occasionally alarming diet. And they won't make you barf.

Follow Marie Claire on Facebook for the latest celeb news, beauty tips, fascinating reads, livestream video, and more.

The rest is here:

Vitamin What? This Food-Based Supplement Line Might Be the Nutritional Antidote You're Looking For - MarieClaire.com

Posted in Food Supplements | Comments Off on Vitamin What? This Food-Based Supplement Line Might Be the Nutritional Antidote You’re Looking For – MarieClaire.com