Daily Archives: November 25, 2016

Ayn Rand Predicted an American Slide toward Fascism …

Posted: November 25, 2016 at 10:19 am

In a letter written on March 19, 1944, Ayn Rand remarked: Fascism, Nazism, Communism and Socialism are only superficial variations of the same monstrous themecollectivism. Rand would later expand on this insight in various articles, most notably in two of her lectures at the Ford Hall Forum in Boston: The Fascist New Frontier (Dec. 16, 1962, published as a booklet by the Nathaniel Branden Institute in 1963); and The New Fascism: Rule by Consensus (April 18, 1965, published as Chapter 20 in Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal [CUI] by New American Library in 1967).

The world conflict of today is the conflict of the individual against the state.

Rand knew better than to accept the traditional left-right dichotomy between socialism (or communism) and fascism, according to which socialism is the extreme version of left-ideology and fascism is the extreme version of right-ideology (i.e., capitalism). Indeed, in The Ayn Rand Letter (Nov. 8, 1971) she characterized fascism as socialism for big business. Both are variants of statism, in contrast to a free country based on individual rights and laissez-faire capitalism. As Rand put it in Conservativism: An Obituary (CUI, Chapter 19):

The world conflict of today is the conflict of the individual against the state, the same conflict that has been fought throughout mankinds history. The names change, but the essenceand the resultsremain the same, whether it is the individual against feudalism, or against absolute monarchy, or against communism or fascism or Nazism or socialism or the welfare state.

The placement of socialism and fascism at opposite ends of a political spectrum serves a nefarious purpose, according to Rand. It serves to buttress the case that we must avoid extremism and choose the sensible middle course of a mixed economy. Quoting from Extremism, Or The Art of Smearing (CUI, Chapter 17):

If it were true that dictatorship is inevitable and that fascism and communism are the two extremes at the opposite ends of our course, then what is the safest place to choose? Why, the middle of the road. The safely undefined, indeterminate, mixed-economy, moderate middlewith a moderate amount of government favors and special privileges to the rich and a moderate amount of government handouts to the poorwith a moderate respect for rights and a moderate degree of brute forcewith a moderate amount of freedom and a moderate amount of slaverywith a moderate degree of justice and a moderate degree of injusticewith a moderate amount of security and a moderate amount of terrorand with a moderate degree of tolerance for all, except those extremists who uphold principles, consistency, objectivity, morality and who refuse to compromise.

In both of her major articles on fascism (cited above) Rand distinguished between fascism and socialism by noting a rather technical (and ultimately inconsequential) difference in their approaches to private property. Here is the relevant passage from The New Fascism: Rule by Consensus:

Observe that both socialism and fascism involve the issue of property rights. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Observe the difference in those two theories: socialism negates private property rights altogether, and advocates the vesting of ownership and control in the community as a whole, i.e., in the state; fascism leaves ownership in the hands of private individuals, but transfers control of the property to the government.

Ownership without control is a contradiction in terms: it means property, without the right to use it or to dispose of it. It means that the citizens retain the responsibility of holding property, without any of its advantages, while the government acquires all the advantages without any of the responsibility.

In this respect, socialism is the more honest of the two theories. I say more honest, not betterbecause, in practice, there is no difference between them: both come from the same collectivist-statist principle, both negate individual rights and subordinate the individual to the collective, both deliver the livelihood and the lives of the citizens into the power of an omnipotent government and the differences between them are only a matter of time, degree, and superficial detail, such as the choice of slogans by which the rulers delude their enslaved subjects.

Contrary to many conservative commentators during the 1960s, Rand maintained that America was drifting toward fascism, not socialism, and that this descent was virtually inevitable in a mixed economy. A mixed economy is an explosive, untenable mixture of two opposite elements, freedom and statism, which cannot remain stable, but must ultimately go one way or the other (Extremism, or The Art of Smearing). Economic controls generate their own problems, and with these problems come demands for additional controlsso either those controls must be abolished or a mixed economy will eventually degenerate into a form of economic dictatorship. Rand conceded that most American advocates of the welfare state are not socialists, that they never advocated or intended the socialization of private property. These welfare-statists want to preserve private property while calling for greater government control over such property. But that is the fundamental characteristic of fascism.

A mixed economy is ruled by pressure groups. It is an amoral, institutionalized civil war of special interests and lobbies.

Rand gave us some of the finest analyses of a mixed economyits premises, implications, and long-range consequencesever penned by a free-market advocate. In The New Fascism, for example, she compared a mixed economy to a system that operates by the law of the jungle, a system in which no ones interests are safe, everyones interests are on a public auction block, and anything goes for anyone who can get away with it. A mixed economy divides a country into an ever-growing number of enemy camps, into economic groups fighting one another for self preservation in an indeterminate mixture of defense and offense. Although Rand did not invoke Thomas Hobbes in this context, it is safe to say that the economic chaos of a mixed economy resembles the Hobbesian war of all against all in a state of nature, a system in which interest groups feel the need to screw others before they get screwed themselves.

A mixed economy is ruled by pressure groups. It is an amoral, institutionalized civil war of special interests and lobbies, all fighting to seize a momentary control of the legislative machinery, to extort some special privilege at one anothers expense by an act of governmenti.e., by force.

Of course, Rand never claimed that America had degenerated into full-blown fascism (she held that freedom of speech was a bright line in this respect), but she did believe that the fundamental premise of the altruist-collectivist moralitythe foundation of all collectivist regimes, including fascismwas accepted and preached by modern liberals and conservatives alike. (Those who mistakenly dub Rand a conservative should read Conservatism: An Obituary [CUI, Chapter 19], a scathing critique in which she accused conservative leaders of moral treason. In some respects Rand detested modern conservatives more than she did modern liberals. She was especially contemptuous of those conservatives who attempted to justify capitalism by appealing to religion or to tradition.) Rand illustrated her point in The Fascist New Frontier, a polemical tour de force aimed at President Kennedy and his administration.

There is no such thing as the public interest except as the sum of the interests of individual men.

Rand began this 1962 lecture by quoting passages from the 1920 political platform of the German Nazi Party, including demands for an end to the power of the financial interests, profit sharing in big business, a broad extension of care for the aged, the improvement of public health by government, an all-around enlargement of our entire system of public education, and so forth. All such welfare-state measures, this platform concluded, can only proceed from within on the foundation of The Common Good Before the Individual Good.

Rand had no problem quoting similar proposals and sentiments from President Kennedy and members of his administration, such as Kennedys celebrated remark, And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what America will do for youask what you can do for your country. The particulars of Rands speech will come as no surprise to those familiar with her ideas, but I wish to call attention to her final remarks about the meaning of the public interest. As used by Kennedy and other politicians, both Democratic and Republican, this fuzzy phrase has little if any meaning, except to indicate that individuals have a duty to sacrifice their interests for the sake of a greater, undefined good, as determined by those who wield the brute force of political power. Rand then stated what she regarded as the only coherent meaning of the public interest.

[T]here is no such thing as the public interest except as the sum of the interests of individual men. And the basic, common interest of all menall rational menis freedom. Freedom is the first requirement of the public interestnot what men do when they are free, but that they are free. All their achievements rest on that foundationand cannot exist without them.

The principles of a free, non-coercive social system are the only form of the public interest.

I shall conclude this essay on a personal note. Before I began preparing for this essay, I had not read some of the articles quoted above for many, many years. In fact, I had not read some of the material since my college days 45 years ago. I therefore approached my new readings with a certain amount of trepidation. I liked the articles when I first read them, but would they stand the test of time? Would Rands insights and arguments appear commonplace, even hackneyed, with the passage of so much time? Well, I was pleasantly surprised. Rand was exactly on point on many issues. Indeed, if we substitute President Obama, for President Kennedy or President Johnson many of her points would be even more pertinent today than they were during the 1960s. Unfortunately, the ideological sewer of American politics has become even more foul today than it was in Rands day, but Rand did what she could to reverse the trend, and one person can only do so much. And no one can say that she didnt warn us.

Republished from Libertarianism.org.

See the original post:

Ayn Rand Predicted an American Slide toward Fascism ...

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Ayn Rand Predicted an American Slide toward Fascism …

Schedules – SeaLand

Posted: at 10:18 am

ACX SOUTHBOUND KINGSTON (JM) - CARTAGENA (CO) - MANZANILLO (PA) - MANAUS (BR) - VITORIA (BR) - SANTOS (BR) - NAVEGANTES (BR) - PARANAGUA (BR) - SANTOS (BR) - RIO DE JANEIRO (BR) - SALVADOR (BR) View Map ACX NORTHBOUND NAVEGANTES (BR) - PARANAGUA (BR) - SANTOS (BR) - RIO DE JANEIRO (BR) - SALVADOR (BR) - KINGSTON (JM) - CARTAGENA (CO) - MANZANILLO (PA) View Map CALYPSO EASTBOUND MANZANILLO (PA) - BARRANQUILLA (CO) - CARTAGENA (CO) - SANTA MARTA (CO) - POINT LISAS (TT) - GEORGETOWN (GY) - PARAMARIBO (SR) View Map CALYPSO WESTBOUND GEORGETOWN (GY) - PARAMARIBO (SR) - POINT LISAS (TT) - BARRANQUILLA (CO) - SANTA MARTA (CO) - MANZANILLO (PA) View Map CARIBBEAN WESTBOUND RIO HAINA (DO) - SAN JUAN (PR) - CAUCEDO (DO) - MANZANILLO (PA) View Map CARIBBEAN EASTBOUND MANZANILLO (PA) - CAUCEDO (DO) - RIO HAINA (DO) - SAN JUAN (PR) View Map CARNAVAL SOUTHBOUND ORANJESTAD (AW) - WILLEMSTAD (CW) - MANZANILLO (PA) - PORT-AU-PRINCE (HT) - KINGSTON (JM) View Map CARNAVAL NORTHBOUND MANZANILLO (PA) - PORT-AU-PRINCE (HT) - KINGSTON (JM) - ORANJESTAD (AW) - WILLEMSTAD (CW) View Map CURACAO WESTBOUND WILLEMSTAD (CW) - MANZANILLO (PA) View Map CURACAO EASTBOUND MANZANILLO (PA) - WILLEMSTAD (CW) View Map ECUBEX SOUTHBOUND MANZANILLO (PA) - BALBOA (PA) - GUAYAQUIL (EC) View Map ECUBEX NORTHBOUND GUAYAQUIL (EC) - BALBOA (PA) - MANZANILLO (PA) - SANTA MARTA (CO) View Map ECUMED SOUTHBOUND CAUCEDO (DO) - MANZANILLO (PA) - BUENAVENTURA (CO) - GUAYAQUIL (EC) View Map ECUMED NORTHBOUND GUAYAQUIL (EC) - BALBOA (PA) - MANZANILLO (PA) View Map GUANTA EASTBOUND KINGSTON (JM) - MANZANILLO (PA) - GUANTA (VE) View Map GUANTA WESTBOUND GUANTA (VE) - KINGSTON (JM) - MANZANILLO (PA) View Map GULFEX NORTHBOUND RIO GRANDE (BR) - NAVEGANTES (BR) - SANTOS (BR) - RIO DE JANEIRO (BR) - CARTAGENA (CO) - VERACRUZ (MX) - ALTAMIRA (MX) - HOUSTON (US) - NEW ORLEANS (US) View Map GULFEX SOUTHBOUND VERACRUZ (MX) - ALTAMIRA (MX) - HOUSTON (US) - NEW ORLEANS (US) - CAUCEDO (DO) - SUAPE (BR) - SANTOS (BR) - RIO GRANDE (BR) - NAVEGANTES (BR) View Map MAE SOUTHBOUND HOUSTON (US) - ALTAMIRA (MX) - VERACRUZ (MX) - SANTO TOMAS (GT) - PUERTO CORTES (HN) - PUERTO LIMON (CR) - MANZANILLO (PA) - CARTAGENA (CO) - CAUCEDO (DO) - SAN JUAN (PR) View Map MAE NORTHBOUND CAUCEDO (DO) - SAN JUAN (PR) - CARTAGENA (CO) - MANZANILLO (PA) - PUERTO LIMON (CR) - SANTO TOMAS (GT) - PUERTO CORTES (HN) - HOUSTON (US) - ALTAMIRA (MX) - VERACRUZ (MX) View Map MARACAIBO WESTBOUND GUARANAO (VE) - MARACAIBO (VE) - MANZANILLO (PA) View Map MARACAIBO EASTBOUND MANZANILLO (PA) - GUARANAO (VE) - MARACAIBO (VE) View Map NAE NORTHBOUND CARTAGENA (CO) - MANZANILLO (PA) - PORT EVERGLADES (US) - PHILADELPHIA (US) - NEW YORK (US) - SAVANNAH (US) View Map NAE SOUTHBOUND PHILADELPHIA (US) - NEW YORK (US) - SAVANNAH (US) - PORT EVERGLADES (US) - CARTAGENA (CO) - MANZANILLO (PA) View Map OCEANIA SOUTHBOUND PHILADELPHIA (US) - CHARLESTON (US) - CARTAGENA (CO) - BALBOA (PA) View Map OCEANIA NORTHBOUND CRISTOBAL (PA) - MANZANILLO (PA) - CARTAGENA (CO) - PHILADELPHIA (US) - CHARLESTON (US) View Map PLATA FEEDER NORTHBOUND MONTEVIDEO (UY) - BUENOS AIRES (AR) - RIO GRANDE (BR) - NAVEGANTES (BR) View Map PLATA FEEDER SOUTHBOUND NAVEGANTES (BR) - MONTEVIDEO (UY) - BUENOS AIRES (AR) - RIO GRANDE (BR) View Map SAE NORTHBOUND MANZANILLO (PA) - PUERTO CORTES (HN) - SANTO TOMAS (GT) - FREEPORT (BS) - WILMINGTON (US) - NORFOLK (US) - PHILADELPHIA (US) - SAVANNAH (US) View Map SAE SOUTHBOUND NORFOLK (US) - PHILADELPHIA (US) - WILMINGTON (US) - SAVANNAH (US) - SANTO TOMAS (GT) - PUERTO CORTES (HN) - PUERTO MOIN (CR) - MANZANILLO (PA) View Map SL CUMBIA SOUTHBOUND VERACRUZ (MX) - ALTAMIRA (MX) - HOUSTON (US) - NEW ORLEANS (US) - KINGSTON (JM) - CARTAGENA (CO) - MANZANILLO (PA) View Map VENEZUELA WESTBOUND (LAG) LA GUAIRA (VE) - MANZANILLO (PA) - CARTAGENA (CO) View Map VENEZUELA EASTBOUND (LAG) MANZANILLO (PA) - CARTAGENA (CO) - LA GUAIRA (VE) View Map VENEZUELA EASTBOUND (PBL) MANZANILLO (PA) - CARTAGENA (CO) - PUERTO CABELLO (VE) View Map VENEZUELA WESTBOUND (PBL) PUERTO CABELLO (VE) - MANZANILLO (PA) - CARTAGENA (CO) View Map XCL NORTHBOUND MANZANILLO (PA) - KINGSTON (JM) - PORT-AU-PRINCE (HT) View Map XCL SOUTHBOUND PORT-AU-PRINCE (HT) - KINGSTON (JM) - MANZANILLO (PA) View Map

Read more:

Schedules - SeaLand

Posted in Sealand | Comments Off on Schedules – SeaLand

The Camphill Assocation of North America Communities

Posted: at 10:17 am

For Adults

Camphill Village U.S.A. Copake, New York Camphill Village USA is a unique and vibrant life-sharing community of 250 individuals, including over 100 adults with developmental disabilities. Founded in Copake, New York in 1961, Camphill Village USA is the oldest and largest Camphill community in North America and sits on 615 acres of verdant hills, pastures, and beautiful gardens in southern Columbia County.

Camphill Village Kimberton Hills Kimberton, Pennsylvania Camphill Village Kimberton Hills is a dynamic farming, gardening, and handcrafting intentional community that includes adults with developmental disabilities. Over 100 Kimberton Hills residents, living and working side by side, create a caring community for people of all ages and varied abilities. Located on 432 acres of farm, gardens, and woodlands in Chester County, Pennsylvania, Kimberton Hills is also a local center for culture and a model for sound ecological living.

Camphill Village Minnesota Sauk Centre, Minnesota Camphill Village Minnesota is a life-sharing, residential community of fifty people, including adults with disabilities. Their lives, work and celebrations are woven into the rhythms of nature found in the rolling hills, sparkling waterways, and prairie grasslands of Central Minnesota. The community is deeply rooted in the belief that every individual , regardless of limitations, is an independent, spiritual being. Each person is part of the fabric of Community experience and is worthy of recognition, respect and honor.

Camphill Communities Ontario Angus, Ontario, Canada Camphill Communities Ontario provides opportunities for adults with developmental disabilities to live, learn and work together with others in an atmosphere of mutual respect and equality.

Camphill Communities California Soquel, California Camphill Communities California, an intentional community which includes adults with developmental disabilities, is located along the central Pacific coast in the beautiful Monterey Bay area.

Camphill Hudson Hudson, New York Camphill Hudson is a small but growing urban initiative in the thriving community of Hudson, NY. Located two hours north of New York City by train in downtown Hudson, Camphill Hudson is ideally situated for those who wish to contribute to Camphill life and participate in the life of the wider community. Individuals in the Camphill Hudson community make a life for themselves contributing to the city around them.

Heartbeet Lifesharing Hardwick, Vermont Heartbeet is a vibrant lifesharing Camphill community and licensed therapeutic residence that includes adults with developmental disabilities and interweaves the social and agricultural realms for the healing and renewing of our society and the earth. Community members live and work together, in beautiful extended family households, forming a mutually supportive environment that enables each individual to discover and develop his or her unique abilities and potential.

The Cascadia Society North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada The Cascadia Society is a life-sharing community that includes adults with special needs. Cultural, artistic and therapeutic experiences are provided through residential home care and day activities within the urban setting of Vancouvers North Shore. The Cascadia Society is dedicated to bringing healing to human beings and to the earth. Their primary task is to allow the potential in each person to unfold and to be in harmonious relationship with the environment.

The Ita Wegman Association of BC Duncan, British Columbia, Canada Glenora Farm is a therapeutic farm, one of two Camphill Communities in Western Canada where adults with developmental disabilities live, work and learn together with their caregivers.

Camphill Special School Glenmoore, Pennsylvania Camphill Special Schools mission is to create wholeness for children and youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities through education and therapy in extended family living so that they may be better understood and their disabilities moderated, that they may more fully unfold their potential, and that they more fully and meaningfully participate in life.

Triform Camphill Community Hudson, New York Triform Camphill Community is a residential community for young adults with developmental disabilities. It includes a dynamic mix of over 100 people spanning many generations, cultures and ranges of ability. Forty young adults with social, mental, physical and emotional disabilities, live and work side-by-side with full time volunteer resident staff and the staffs families on a 410 acre biodynamic/organic farm in beautiful Columbia County, NY.

Camphill Soltane Glenmoore, Pennsylvania Camphill Soltane is a life-sharing community of 80 people, including young adults ages 18-25, and adults age 25 and up, with developmental disabilities.

Camphill Ghent Chatham, New York Camphill Ghent is a residential community for elders who appreciate living independently within a lively community, but who would also like occasional help with daily challenges, ranging from housekeeping and cooking to maintenance and driving services.

Plowshare Farm Greenfield, NH Plowshare Farm is an attempt to be responsive to the social, human, spiritual and ecological challenges of our times by working toward creating an environment where every person and every aspect of the natural world can be learned from and valued. They are a small, thriving community where lives are shared, where nourishing the land in turn nourishes the individual who is tending that land, and where animal care creates the potential for people who are usually the care receivers to become the care givers. Nestled on over 200 acres in the countryside of southern New Hampshire, Plowshare Farm provides a peaceful setting of exceptional natural beauty.

Oakwood Lifesharing West Plains, Missouri Through meaningful activities, a healing environment, and truly human companionship, Oakwood Lifesharing encourages each person to master their own life. This mastery occurs in the context of family, community and society. By emphasizing both independence and interdependence, Oakwood promotes individuals to become dignified and effective citizens in the community.

For more information on Camphill Communities Worldwide, visit http://www.camphill.net

View original post here:

The Camphill Assocation of North America Communities

Posted in Intentional Communities | Comments Off on The Camphill Assocation of North America Communities

N. Katherine Hayles – Wikipedia

Posted: at 10:16 am

N. Katherine Hayles (born 16 December 1943) is a postmodern literary critic, most notable for her contribution to the fields of literature and science, electronic literature, and American literature.[1] She is professor and Director of Graduate Studies in the Program in Literature at Duke University.[2]

Hayles was born in Saint Louis, Missouri to Edward and Thelma Bruns. She received her B.S. in Chemistry from the Rochester Institute of Technology in 1966, and her M.S. in Chemistry from the California Institute of Technology in 1969. She worked as a research chemist in 1966 at Xerox Corporation and as a chemical research consultant Beckman Instrument Company from 1968-1970. Hayles then switched fields and received her M.A. in English Literature from Michigan State University in 1970, and her Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Rochester in 1977.[3] She is a social and literary critic.

Her scholarship primarily focuses on the "relations between science, literature, and technology."[4][5] Hayles has taught at UCLA, University of Iowa, University of MissouriRolla, the California Institute of Technology, and Dartmouth College.[3] She was the faculty director of the Electronic Literature Organization from 2001-2006.[6]

Hayles understands "human" and "posthuman" as constructions that emerge from historically specific understandings of technology, culture and embodiment; "human and "posthuman" views each produce unique models of subjectivity.[7] Within this framework "human" is aligned with Enlightenment notions of liberal humanism, including its emphasis on the "natural self" and the freedom of the individual.[8] Conversely, Posthuman does away with the notion of a "natural" self and emerges when human intelligence is conceptualized as being co-produced with intelligent machines. According to Hayles the posthuman view privileges information over materiality, considers consciousness as an epiphenomenon and imagines the body as a prosthesis for the mind .[9] Specifically Hayles suggests that in the posthuman view "there are no essential differences or absolute demarcations between bodily existence and computer simulation..."[8] The posthuman thus emerges as a deconstruction of the liberal humanist notion of "human."

Despite drawing out the differences between "human" and "posthuman", Hayles is careful to note that both perspectives engage in the erasure of embodiment from subjectivity.[10] In the liberal humanist view, cognition takes precedence over the body, which is narrated as an object to possess and master. Meanwhile, popular conceptions of the cybernetic posthuman imagine the body as merely a container for information and code. Noting the alignment between these two perspectives, Hayles uses How We Became Posthuman to investigate the social and cultural processes and practices that led to the conceptualization of information as separate from the material that instantiates it.[11] Drawing on diverse examples, such as Turing's Imitation Game, Gibson's Neuromancer and cybernetic theory, Hayles traces the history of what she calls "the cultural perception that information and materiality are conceptually distinct and that information is in some sense more essential, more important and more fundamental than materiality."[12] By tracing the emergence of such thinking, and by looking at the manner in which literary and scientific texts came to imagine, for example, the possibility of downloading human consciousness into a computer, Hayles attempts to trouble the information/material separation and in her words, "...put back into the picture the flesh that continues to be erased in contemporary discussions about cybernetic subjects.[13]

In the years since Hayles' How We Became Posthuman was published, it has been both praised and critiqued by scholars who have viewed her work through a variety of lenses; including those of cybernetic history, feminism, postmodernism, cultural and literary criticism, and conversations in the popular press about humans' changing relationships to technology.

Reactions to Hayles' writing style, general organization, and scope of the book have been mixed. The book is generally praised for displaying depth and scope in its combining of scientific ideas and literary criticism. Linda Brigham of Kansas State University claims that Hayles manages to lead the text "across diverse, historically contentious terrain by means of a carefully crafted and deliberate organizational structure."[14] Some scholars found her prose difficult to read or over-complicated. Andrew Pickering describes the book as "hard going" and lacking of "straightforward presentation."[15] Dennis Weiss of York College of Pennsylvania accuses Hayles of "unnecessarily complicat[ing] her framework for thinking about the body", for example by using terms such as "body" and "embodiment" ambiguously. Weiss however acknowledges as convincing her use of science fiction in order to reveal how "the narrowly focused, abstract constellation of ideas" of cybernetics circulate through a broader cultural context.[16] Craig Keating of Langara College on the contrary argues that the obscurity of some texts questions their ability to function as the conduit for scientific ideas.[17]

Several scholars reviewing How We Became Posthuman highlighted the strengths and shortcomings of her book vis a vis its relationship to feminism. Amelia Jones of University of Southern California describes Hayles' work as reacting to the misogynistic discourse of the field of cybernetics.[18] As Pickering wrote, Hayles' promotion of an "embodied posthumanism" challenges cybernetics' "equation of human-ness with disembodied information" for being "another male trick to feminists tired of the devaluation of women's bodily labor."[15] Stephanie Turner of Purdue University also described Hayles' work as an opportunity to challenge prevailing concepts of the human subject which assumed the body was white, male, and European, but suggested Hayles' dialectic method may have taken too many interpretive risks, leaving some questions open about "which interventions promise the best directions to take."[19]

Reviewers were mixed about Hayles' construction of the posthuman subject. Weiss describes Hayles' work as challenging the simplistic dichotomy of human and post-human subjects in order to "rethink the relationship between human beings and intelligent machines," however suggests that in her attempt to set her vision of the posthuman apart from the "realist, objectivist epistemology characteristic of first-wave cybernetics", she too, falls back on universalist discourse, premised this time on how cognitive science is able to reveal the "true nature of the self."[16] Jones similarly described Hayles' work as reacting to cybernetics' disembodiment of the human subject by swinging too far towards an insistence on a "physical reality" of the body apart from discourse. Jones argued that reality is rather "determined in and through the way we view, articulate, and understand the world".[18]

In terms of the strength of Hayles' arguments regarding the return of materiality to information, several scholars expressed doubt on the validity of the provided grounds, notably evolutionary psychology. Keating claims that while Hayles is following evolutionary psychological arguments in order to argue for the overcoming of the disembodiment of knowledge, she provides "no good reason to support this proposition."[17] Brigham describes Hayles' attempt to connect autopoietic circularity to "an inadequacy in Maturana's attempt to account for evolutionary change" as unjustified.[14] Weiss suggests that she makes the mistake of "adhering too closely to the realist, objectivist discourse of the sciences," the same mistake she criticizes Weiner and Maturana for committing.[16]

Continue reading here:

N. Katherine Hayles - Wikipedia

Posted in Posthuman | Comments Off on N. Katherine Hayles – Wikipedia

Space Exploration – U.S. Scouting Service Project

Posted: at 10:16 am

d~{~W+>?]qrwGy7?h6l`A==+rf04|Q|XzC['w76vcE_xak'[JaA7B~XdtAQKmU|f-fmBC .df PIjVRy9TSC_i)k7#x*gEx?IAE$HpHv=kG1}DUW[Yu9*1YmBvmMJt/qx[;:k9+sf*;yWvesx:Vo;ru^"&/)>:gP*Z/SUqx=(NZXb%== Vt! y&VzOeVvt JSe~YGUm93*MS4&%X$mS$ Me--&5e-FFhmb'mV]Q-4B5# endstream endobj 3340 0 obj > endobj 3341 0 obj > endobj 3342 0 obj >stream xXTG?>><93s99s]6#$(5{6KB=v8f.BP3=?_{zNlB>ZxYE'K |@^YW"!5*BbPk6Pv }@D} 6{>`|M~j..Hd~#BZUT8X`!)5PaMrq/n|am'4,d ,)!-)[E|ftt4_Xn"w F(e"Vqn4h9h"wrSRf.x]3,)LQRM,{I12xkt#t.,*+S{{CrfE~{#-igi-?w+,[steGyx& @

oWd+)1C/X>NbOlFHE? (1_k,m:`f>/r:JQi/l&{8fWcM H|oGr~lmK-Z^#-?Wy#LkXVuN{6C}jQ.M_k#?Y= :}?Vy]_}4sl;s~^Kold;GssC~)]NF?RQbuKgne +doh;aEIK:TAPOKw4orWj# `%=R#'W:FJ_XQ/Sj6nTwP[KTQ6-|NzCS[g_Pu][}']w]r%vO6wu_zv{/NlwV-z]-OZvWU.3~t9Oj2[fU~/m?shOS.yOfu-[alpZ~m?,:~"U0t hXPpg4"7BJd44dR!aRTg:/<&FLn4p3|Q=Y,iu3u]9%Fujx->_2lY)[|v,46 {=k]egE7Zw5./6*i+e+K;]/*sC3"mP6 U{h#'?s.-c i,hHQ3flM4 :(;X=Vs``ozFY/j}vz1+of^Yj3ygbo>=8lC"cO.z}Kcg>{Zywoz4bWzk.9y~]XCaDOcog79G|2XUwDz?tKt5PP/2th;th/J/;n-Ogku79Wl2h|t$K~B.IK?3oGSxs:Lg[_t?_I7StOa.;WW&3~4_o._Ig`>G~t-_oN >QM>(fW/w^r39_ss_inLy/9=5{]YX *I'>_NAr+Xf9Uaf|oU5})}c'MRuwKG>>}BR/:%0y: hC :CtOrhM>|m5o)v.}fFS]va4oZ}ncNQ&Ywx8ak['x^noW-wT5=PSvwfk>1o<1wp k5cA~MXO tfgoSWf;-O<[:8O'x5');=^06hx3{FCx>$MnkC=m:((QE?;9-4E7R5Tw>~{NW] g@zK#~t"dQ%.u+kkzb#My,@JXn"?ojcf_0BeOmUo;c^[:O(O3,Me.dn"W`vi#>V-;QU}{|vNVg.O1U/2;PkL/>6a_2F8y76SH56H$hZi?td_=[RVhkeQiu1H]XAQ1Ai(Qg]@)APAK=>y esX:_zV>~tyg]$[U*[sM2-GL}{MY'+}^pW<~)nq LEW*.pcCO/xy}|%ko'C2u|g[_^f6B%m<+kww*k.d=O@-^=v=9}B34c){KATx2}t`M$Yc"a^0Mw 'Ig_{>:O*"&"[^L8_^{f<<~Tj;%wknu[wg3Nt ~9! CR|c'An}chUO]?S~4 U&oKi=6Mf=ZvLidpJMC+@[Bh6RbEYxSp/I PGh5rF-vk&o%T 9|FYP$63HerKRemckgvvqush|p-"Zk];u[ ={%&79_j5 ;'w`^~Aa!C 1r1c0q*L6}FY7/|E,]|+W^v~MU[nz{~f8G;~3?=/tk-A"(<:D z*>1]L?fj+EVh *zg9yj"upruqrrviJ;n.sW[Gw>}RUp?~-GGGG@o(k{g~k___];vTj+jG^/{vWk:S:j?(ij]uw9r!.k.{]vlwYq_zp;~t}s:xK.^%Kyp.(UlJ jWo^UZS2_Vj{]I6-Gj&nh:Bk $Cqh6zih>L(!Z z0m`5UBpeC::63G~Cwg(("A"P)!wP24D#F[=1ikx-z?_Ka>TdWx^XEX2@/ 5^Wx ^x7a= x xXw]XeX-P--{Vx/5x?5lv5zn_Vcg>>]v>g,`OW|" ~2~g~_ o;a7DM1S,D BJ})1eFSJJ(9eAYR GYQJ5 t(GRSS)g@Qn;A5<)/)6*mh;I9@k4G5.3f!B6Zld q 4"muy_:oxAf!~@r$egJ 1Ug'Gm"G/K5g,:+s;)Z!/~A W[A}8XexSW F}3Y4r0CBb@tM+ UF,<%M+EdJ 3 -Ic) h7Hp,=92t11CRd@=/ Uo~x#xQ 6~O6>}^u fSK`?Ms@ ( $*Mq4M:;=#>8^8`)5E4uzES5BOX( gf2;<n,5Y"5f6 Rj$UO0TlJ_j9;c*Cz5i9"$1zZoX [|}Jdj}PONIAdTkQ(&j iT*ioJ -- S]r+?LiilUofxiS zrQo'^lPpe+lh+:~y:U(Y>2z[/2S{3Q+@Bd*Zd0ulUw5GFh;Jd)FfEbaQA3xpf!h!7AVE7rZ$j ,5mKyB'GF}wp9o]70PFVMTk kBg,[V|}?(5X eE6("?9}$dAA/@%$cH3.M<2@Fz)+2(04$;SP6yul!{xjyfE{O_8zw)uOthz4@Qz4l?*MegP)6ZWID" ,+axB<4#$ rx9yl hM1aEGV3%>nbOXex&)b4AHTcV(*Poa'~B!AA`l$" MycGvAvo5zM#v>p){mi=]2Zk;Uw>rw'XG<>^<(hC3JA8O$ah'9kf wRNr>} 4Tk[v]q1(,HE>) 0|hd'I04S(^V>kwfiY]uH&9|%^-mED! s(FrZ(b*O"DP5Y0bS%HJf5,J;Tdg4+od! nkjk3t{oje#w w;URF*pI}&W:D N$J*l-J6I,H%LY%2,&5ka'W/ T7U )FM)w%+*(N^,rB7:H]]j:xL&PY;Y=T;hd@;T:v?rIkRqY-O@v^gq*[$alXsrjN}n8%!UB=bJbHX@D4!6)Rsl1;iF$ZZ$LJK20Lbv0A+F1*kFe7|vpD&C8[IE'cVp6rnZrYY(?7Lfxyq&NaK WGueCsf8?nGC7V5S5BV|%I`)^+bV]U$/ zE*%7e<2763$;lK"D$.J Is>@0Y-p0AL>`(4XbEMmf]~%{]xK':2dAaXN"KaXUHl!KGB /@*t]$M.,m.!q"d{JnP;jzwb#xd$Z7 mxP-T!tL2_ciK1{@r>A#MXHY*SV{"HRz =^Eooh4MG38ULUjZEMORo;UK[^(jRP xj>ck?" }#hlzmt< O'IxD.JV*u|yjdpaJ0s&2CdIF6,`p.l[i9[w%u[@JwE ZeyzL=a|L 1MU{Qo!fPU]0c@V/JE#FQVVDC[U$#QB(r;X3[)Ku)r~b:XUB$'=%&e"RZZ)TCeo"{AdYb7wJ<@jm/GxjJ`12US|>cmJ($dHZ*McpKVUT4RTjU?# H*CppC=$#,ZEr0R2w~@U%s u .q5;`JN 7I{VC8[}]`$EyzQ )~1tJGO? XgQY<6I%s@B$g,2Hb4ct3c)#K}%;&$3zSViTZUuD5I5OR]RYu*J m;e_Ep>>.d|& 1)%CM:{y/2Kmgix2^u_Xzzb$/ Wze, bYh6'!(AW||j!)|>'U6p3'6##T"1_t5?8:.`kl2e 2+Qm&pB(F(h':)(r_*)v cK fRa@" 0RT lA "ORV P*dRidh9P"Jg%#Px?qHn$DW8B$ 8 P~oxVnZOj+oW6~[kw{?5.C.6};>ugB5@(cDzMDRHy4@uV@FPR~9= '$?H!MR!)CRH10Fg2NNP pR;&B[k0W#(b /s~/@TIC}S_c,+ :# <4 t08kmZ@?RC^>hw~ (n/>fRE0qsk_OdD$5NF>)6Nw:Y:$WNd:ho3"?mq0m:3GAq`'NM3mRoKS3*Q(5/ |=`G;1"[+ ^OD7P FSB:Mc:gnt0gHd gy}0h3S"zS -$z2&l{HbHa!U6H&b0VKn@vM>k }WCZs6KlllAh?F~Cw 0/>|`rN/D~G ?W=&]4*JB eQXf5*bKD8}ss8wp6wrraao7>FyOR;3{qjR_s@& GBhx ! `Wwcx_, g,1 fQ?B FvLy1'o)*|*'g3"MoW7 yu<>?Sk&?l!^o9n=xO L07~kH 19YKpph2 6h*oAyupfvg)wvL< 78;p~ q!0pL(d :{r&RP/N"z4D<44Gx 'u XTCTE}!' gf|@1$c]L(.>ckMhXLtc2xq$7$~CFmA;Atr2c$(st"`V9%a#` Lgu-x LKr[+=+ fFWHKbnm"]"}} ~7>Lz4l/HUqgB 2.;?}cGoOW80a'q*appH%wu3[Oy&uj>z"P/C!u+B |3(aQkM#'D3 4Y#M4vhHQ?Dw&Z+meH$iiMED?&#P&oJ+GJ]M4WjS2^HhEHs%DeAz{YfPl4G[ydL4#J"eA~y3!M4+vDN1 rr naca-|9 -hZh7"&0uYZ9-1M4Lh3#o&,GsWDh_F{dg;2ru^n3K33Z;*P7V7W7&Ts0:/XY| KsOJ)P- GKeBbulZzaI8'sV]6G9ii% sRa:?L]28f tj]:#gpQ4LL2stDe241Z~yNAz^I^2g:3?og3O`g&$K0QZp+YtDO90kFf:A%:#+XC~( @% Q:*F:BtZbOY2js|zAmk'{>z7B'G>k7iT sQ'GSPW b'l-a>2c73` y&prt+<@y{r6Qj7@+uMF-F4KR?G"INf.Zn57v6B!`K9,I7o3lNi0sKYdgf:]K4vqj+06Y`d VJ^Mzs#yA|nD:;+ (if:e c"nl"Q:'`n~!VoMQR6o!7qzLI7Y?`LN+9es+7pkds3|&g>4giMgzdg*H9&p=JeOYDF'+!-hF0WZQFs6yd2pC%'h9CF#cD548s8/}>28(kXE=Di=F-^YP>s$6K^'F1Zk<~"i&k]I"<^ ckO4ZCAS<&Hyc]e|r=a6Uz}?y-Yq-<,)9;KHh3MBLHE-m8I#'OPx)cr~>Gc;p1q?'nypj3b 5?~zL,l2~oO zor7nwXD e72wnls]nVqbZ1-h& cLK-hP=L7m}+/7|G>) $N0ozu?CA.6Ke{#tgV~FG1zea`eHI)R*"H52;[SzLfv;k[1*'DAuJi'&z}F? 4+DB!^1Z#!+N?va,~!k`X&V5b8^*f+KzqVHvqZDI.)#%:J(ZmC<"m6A5i"kdC *H+dVTRAE* )d `R +hHI*]R jCCBC%j^uUJ5NiINkB#BPM)qAU=xNCl6P *uVNtJDJ,lW-lU,[,g+Y7@-pl@!@$F@ DiCj0$-TQxp}M:_#J>^'q3d )O#[k4;&LKJFJ??C|Y3CJ:tOuHA?oNRI>Av#>BH|A( Z`Kg;J,~LJH|P/F|bc6tcxpcz7'%xJS)9.C7;"{r,>dYhzXpi8)1 }RUIlg%[loLl_9`7PTRt_cRVNDZBHFQh>6;T[+JIba`VJ::XR|RuW@' L;368t'lPPv (@L:.%qq`g@Y@U#C`J d endstream endobj 1 0 obj <>/XObject<>>>/Contents 6 0 R/Annots 7 0 R/CropBox[ 0 0 612 792]/Rotate 0>> endobj 2 0 obj <>stream JFIFC $, !$4.763.22:ASF:=N>22HbINVX]^]8EfmeZlS[]YC**Y;2;YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYKK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz?i!A$qsopF=[wUW'~`Eg3Zd_IwAp}&{9&rcP0DiUvD$uio1'VmKvqpaRA,D8&rOTVIz}:cq$q'!$.B+mu)y@yA H=A8'zJRw:-;"5Nj{l)#-nW=s?QHZ0fN]Q{]Ex8B;Hypnr&|HPb_ion$`c@y;IyGwf-B&vnTJCrN}gN!2Pxa8Bb:d'/b%'-W?cq_M Q9@Onke;xh'2>"K-Xo8`|pO^|1Ien0FGs#J(:JW]`r~NXM*M(Pxlh6Wjn#OlO=%!hOu'8!_z/7WKsvOa[vv[@KW qQZ endstream endobj 3 0 obj 2035 endobj 4 0 obj >stream JFIFC $, !$4.763.22:ASF:=N>22HbINVX]^]8EfmeZlS[]YC**Y;2;YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz?( ( (kbG$}Ih,/IwWkA7`8,DohW/}fAQ=xP.kX[u88Sk} IIe9!-=I?"7'1S%-^{h +m }:~UJ_P^h}I^j?aqsb-c%gRi$ R!kTSZuY.$+zV9m^O?lFUW%WYw#kd,+A Wi n,$|=Wn#6IIhzrP3Wy&b5-JCteW(Yvq$o>gVHA9,IF%qVbi*n%%lg4 86u4lcAtKoE9o)e[8MIUx8j? F1 l_`va:V07CX1F Q dEV9j4Cl$#>hWXjZ7Eun!29'Z5Z|/I|&! ut(((J d0o%_ZL2|vEM{F>LgEw=X/%8^S)T.9aPCP@D/{~S*&[uRuV5Fw-{}k+jAc>Ig@nJ:HF3Fvq1H{VF+Y&weRk>LEJ 2xu_Zj1Y)n F:uZFC+yOh"hHY-qR[cy"/%bDzgu-XX|o|FY8r|+.l~>5! q^_] ]E5~R7/|AEWHQ@4p:_6ice@PpM=U>ZI8y-Bk'iS75t2>ka!fk2D9>Ogo: Ojb>Ne3JpT_EfGp`djws2cns4j/0}vM@Z[HRQ,khRv,y;f2+v"Gkv1.[3v3ZrqL]"cia0e@*t+i*Gg*Ao.OT+kk#>*p{fEM;ZKPi,#92i{tj_i *H0 M]8XGNZ4=j|JQn&ByS`m?`@>c/snr"}^RVg%@yNuZ!'2DwG;edS6+o$+a cOsr>!<' ;RNLoI-(xQZ,l~L<8rQOwTjYVDF/)(r!9>qyt-q6vctU}xQ[jcS;K9sOh-dG *Kqk9&V_zX%/y6jNfZV] .[.&d]kXe]/~Oz[d&O"'/IBKawio?=6OsaI-Nb7Zi{dR'udSu-[Mp%Uq=+~'f>U4Y9^1})$Y~ gQS?e-S:(1EsuH/yxy[c$h*|De`nsV%X2RW8kQ)Kl2>ee9+ToA5#Rc{VYM4M'&ZE5X2WXcaO28S,(Vo[l!7?rAIY}ZK&ls4]kqt! %9-1[XM{hXrYPi1&}1h:3aO88<.,y< 6xUjQ|q1*!McCX{C<2{`w*}E+Z7_+8 dxYo6j}GFidfv)ol.9qj`XC wMMtF(WI??8CyE([|v]:`QdQU:Sn=WiArsI4dz FiTz3JP xk0J ;tw/y*zK>:x~FdSv-w dz",*p@ms{V~},X bOSQd*% cFzHZdW$9}*1IFK]4Lpt|+J7|1.RJ@~/xO{WxL: asqZ;&rN (uE;v{HlxDLJL6v@s]B[uj' VqVX&. 9lS,0JVSZo_8 $(Z-|W89 VR3qQD7%Rsy5s4*B`>G=h5DrM{aJ:61d&WQSiCeu>in#qS-dW>DjA?8S!=b.7;{}igbl(2KksYV>:R+Or9A^ T)r96}(OL.@:Vmd_1~-85UM#/,qS?+cTW!|mb#Q~0,BQ {H&(3_IfX8 $b#n}}MVXu?vcrFH~rG(R R2AU}$7|eq9[9/2uLY QdZ{nXL9l@"6`_9SU;D| FTp+EJOdrN?qqPzw6G)BFQsmG:I152*52zLWSu>F4&eJVgg5MF*z:&_Anb3s+2lu`5}EPw6o9~MvRDn^ tx4{ sb'XS4SZ&@1.{>s]*i;E*aF< ZNz-q11]GG!=qkuvH[U5OT*I MZ( 2nA5dCsd0KUv3n9rE]Qzm$]=)Z;ecC1ee-.Aw)6RwJvF~iUQ,zuYaNF{b+;NhCF[yIW"M|SX~[1oqZ[ IEs>FM G0:[`K0y5CWY?:m@MczZZ;N+u0/M>WN|R]LZpV:zNf)Q#E:+MVVd{']C-;+[2oFOA[1]j KSZ_s@#H7w}^pdl)//LxT]93g du`RM"t?q(#+BLqgziOqjf[75nG%`Ue=Kq;.oc#`t=Z.-?:AR;fY)TetPS29%fG<>j,:VxU~=tuCT{2I^MCohC!$ou*5i 4p3>zsxeI+}bME%bPnSQq)g=.Q|<,csK'j@SY0Z{ kQ5c;gnTg564I4GZT]$ L};g6ms^,V9|=+$kszu,P$[xS({VW2Nik}Z"d5BI.W={L({:O~d1y;Itoa#c }0 -UGuz{7j?5I!zdLc5F)qTdnc8i+7N77 }7dq[*/2Y%oy1,0IP-URkQ@MG 0GJ{YlnLDmjdl'l?Msvjg~Y# LR82EXB-JKAJR^H9Wk+tWG#M;2WH:0mmoI,1=ty*C!jn:dOjN|cIp?ZLyY:SE 7#J %ktm4{;k`^1|"Kg$1U(!{Dh9?'Uzu&[,X|tsXbO:f.eXR6Ns[6:CveM1]sj;A+R5^{{E=+~HI8STEhlay&?JK*L[I`4VX[|ZwT^c9c%qZDB'QPY@uU|w!sFM%( ((jZzHI>?ClnYJQ]fuQI'c R q }+O.Uka z0WkkS5o.J5}/oV_BAV3^(J( 0GV,m!;T#J8"vBX_JM=Jr0L+^|9B-"3ZI j}-+^RZUStmm%mc }-OEuT])k;H>u~).'w ?FD(iFO{F%+AE ( (vIZZkpLRE{*XCG''aQmQo*u<pEZ{kLgU8Wl+*mhkIkwZ>6e;,XH=$hN%+y/x?*Z2XKN[hrZ u$n4G-Et TB~i ZgL8#it>8DL/)PfbAes><_ ?Uu;#['R.,OV;/"!2w2'82=jv&IYh-0*Ajk^+Q[QZg&Zkv&s(((E[0-PMYt9AEQ3dOb#GEgjEM;_QE#!m5A( N()h ( (? endstream endobj 5 0 obj 8487 endobj 6 0 obj <>stream xXMo6[) f/Q*&@hzH@j#wR.`z3o?43/wj-/z[u ZW^[mq^(S[ .MqxJO QrC{7?6?oV$Z:B/MaD ~K3(.g%WkPUs'7`xcg4&!aFv;~q_Wq+8LE;HkpG6^# pX{ v0v8!3s[O!?5~X_;R/vdmoKNp|Wg 05l|D<1k8eod8#E(U9ad%pTmJqSNZdH

See the original post here:

Space Exploration - U.S. Scouting Service Project

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on Space Exploration – U.S. Scouting Service Project

Nanotech – Research

Posted: at 10:15 am

Details Created: 13 December 2013

[This Nanotech West Lab Research News article was contributed by the group of Prof. Ron Reano, Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and ElectroScience Laboratory, of The Ohio State University]

Silicon photonics is a promising approach for chip-scale integrated optics. A single-mode silicon strip waveguide designed for operation in the infrared, for example, has a typical submicron cross-section of 450 nm x 250 nm. Highly confined optical modes allow for high density integration and waveguide bends with micrometer scale radii of curvature. The high confinement, however, also produces major challenges when attempting to efficiently couple light between silicon strip waveguides and optical fibers. Mode conversion from a single-mode fiber, with mode field diameter equal to 10 micrometers, results in a coupling loss that is greater than 20 dB. Current methods designed to achieve efficient fiber-to-chip coupling generally involve edge coupling using inverse width tapered waveguides or surface coupling using grating couplers. Inverse width tapers enable low loss and broadband edge coupling but require dicing or cleaving the chip. Alternatively, grating couplers enable light coupling via the surface of the chip without the need for cleaving. They require, however, a tradeoff between bandwidth and efficiency.

Read more: Cantilever Couplers for Low-loss Fiber Coupling to Silicon Photonic Integrated Circuits

Go here to read the rest:

Nanotech - Research

Posted in Nanotech | Comments Off on Nanotech – Research

Nootropics – Strong Supplement Shop

Posted: at 10:15 am

NOOTROPICS

It's a competitive world and we need any edge we can get. One of the sharpest tools, if not the sharpest tool you can have to get ahead and reach many of your goals in life is a stronger brain. Without a prescription, Nootropics are filling the void for people looking to gain more focus, a stronger memory as well an overall good mood.

Nootropics are being called "smart drugs" due to their effects of increasing cognitive thinking, memory, as well as attention span. Nootropics are being associated with intelligence, mental energy, motivation and focus.

Nootropic basic translation is that of supplements made for neuro enhancement. All things considered nootropics are generally regarded as effective with little to zero side effects. Furthermore nootropics generally refer to cognitive boosting supplements with low toxicity that can be taken for long term. Inclusive of this understanding, nootropics are also non prescription.

Nootropics work by increasing brain function. They will not make you smarter or give you Einsteins IQ, but they can improve your fluid intelligence. Nootropics can increase your brains production of various neurotransmitters which in turn improve your focus and concentration. They also increase your memory, boost your mood and increase your attention span. They key with nootropics, is that they are designed for long term use, and they can alter your level of neurotransmitters permanently. This is HUGE long term benefit!

Regular Price: $29.95

Special Price: $24.95

Regular Price: $22.95

Special Price: $19.95

Regular Price: $24.95

Special Price: $19.95

The rest is here:

Nootropics - Strong Supplement Shop

Posted in Nootropics | Comments Off on Nootropics – Strong Supplement Shop

Modern evolutionary synthesis – Wikipedia

Posted: at 10:13 am

The modern evolutionary synthesis[a] was the widely accepted[1] mid 20th-century synthesis of ideas from fields including genetics, systematics and palaeontology that established evolution as biology's central paradigm.[1][2][3]Embryology was however not integrated into the mid-20th century synthesis; that had to wait for the development of gene manipulation techniques in the 1970s, the growth in understanding of development at a molecular level, and the creation of the modern evolutionary synthesis's successor, evolutionary developmental biology.

The 19th Century ideas of natural selection by Charles Darwin and Mendelian genetics by Gregor Mendel were united by Ronald Fisher, one of the three founders of population genetics, along with J. B. S. Haldane and Sewall Wright, between 1918 and 1932.

The modern synthesis solved difficulties and confusions caused by the specialisation and poor communication between biologists in the early years of the 20th century. At its heart was the question of whether Mendelian genetics could be reconciled with gradual evolution by means of natural selection. A second issue was whether the broad-scale changes of macroevolution seen by palaeontologists could be explained by changes seen in the microevolution of local populations.

The synthesis included evidence from geneticists who studied populations in the field and in the laboratory. These studies were crucial to evolutionary theory. The synthesis drew together ideas from several branches of biology which had become separated, particularly genetics, cytology, systematics, botany, morphology, ecology and paleontology.

Julian Huxley invented the term in his 1942 book, Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. Major figures in the modern synthesis include, Theodosius Dobzhansky, Ivan Schmalhausen,[4]E. B. Ford, Ernst Mayr, Bernhard Rensch, Sergei Chetverikov, George Gaylord Simpson, and G. Ledyard Stebbins.

The modern synthesis of the mid 20th century bridged the gap between the work of experimental geneticists and naturalists, and paleontologists. It states that:[5][6][7]

The idea that speciation occurs after populations are reproductively isolated has been much debated. In plants, polyploidy must be included in any view of speciation. Formulations such as 'evolution consists primarily of changes in the frequencies of alleles between one generation and another' were proposed rather later. The traditional view is that developmental biology played little part in the synthesis,[9] but an account of Gavin de Beer's work by Stephen J. Gould suggests he may be an exception.[10]

Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species (1859) was successful in convincing most biologists that evolution had occurred, but was less successful in convincing them that natural selection was its primary mechanism. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, variations of Lamarckism, orthogenesis ('progressive' evolution), and saltationism (evolution by jumps) were discussed as alternatives.[11] Also, Darwin did not offer a precise explanation of how new species arise. As part of the disagreement about whether natural selection alone was sufficient to explain speciation, George Romanes coined the term neo-Darwinism to refer to the version of evolution advocated by Alfred Russel Wallace and August Weismann with its heavy dependence on natural selection.[12] Weismann and Wallace rejected the Lamarckian idea of inheritance of acquired characteristics, something that Darwin had not ruled out.[13]

Weismann's idea was that the relationship between the hereditary material, which he called the germ plasm (German, Keimplasma), and the rest of the body (the soma) was a one-way relationship: the germ-plasm formed the body, but the body did not influence the germ-plasm, except indirectly in its participation in a population subject to natural selection. Weismann was translated into English, and though he was influential, it took many years for the full significance of his work to be appreciated.[14] Later, after the completion of the modern synthesis, the term neo-Darwinism came to be associated with its core concept: evolution, driven by natural selection acting on variation produced by genetic mutation, and genetic recombination (chromosomal crossovers).[12]

Gregor Mendel's work was re-discovered by Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns in 1900. News of this reached William Bateson in England, who reported on the paper during a presentation to the Royal Horticultural Society in May 1900.[15] It showed that the contributions of each parent retained their integrity rather than blending with the contribution of the other parent. This reinforced a division of thought, which was already present in the 1890s.[16] The two schools were:

The relevance of Mendelism to evolution was unclear and hotly debated, especially by Bateson, who opposed the biometric ideas of his former teacher Weldon. Many scientists believed the two theories substantially contradicted each other.[18] This debate between the biometricians and the Mendelians continued for some 20 years and was only solved by the development of population genetics.

Thomas Hunt Morgan began his career in genetics as a saltationist, and started out trying to demonstrate that mutations could produce new species in fruit flies. However, the experimental work at his lab with the common fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, which helped establish the link between Mendelian genetics and the chromosomal theory of inheritance, demonstrated that rather than creating new species in a single step, mutations increased the genetic variation in the population.[19]

The first step towards the synthesis was the development of population genetics. R. A. Fisher, J. B. S. Haldane, and Sewall Wright provided critical contributions. In 1918, Fisher produced the paper "The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance,"[20] which showed how the continuous variation measured by the biometricians could be the result of the action of many discrete genetic loci. In this and subsequent papers culminating in his 1930 book The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection,[21] Fisher was able to show how Mendelian genetics was, contrary to the thinking of many early geneticists, completely consistent with the idea of evolution driven by natural selection.[22] During the 1920s, a series of papers by Haldane applied mathematical analysis to real-world examples of natural selection such as the evolution of industrial melanism in peppered moths.[22] Haldane established that natural selection could work in the real world at a faster rate than even Fisher had assumed.[23]

Sewall Wright focused on combinations of genes that interacted as complexes, and the effects of inbreeding on small relatively isolated populations, which could exhibit genetic drift. In a 1932 paper, he introduced the concept of an adaptive landscape in which phenomena such as cross breeding and genetic drift in small populations could push them away from adaptive peaks, which would in turn allow natural selection to push them towards new adaptive peaks.[22][24] Wright's model would appeal to field naturalists such as Theodosius Dobzhansky and Ernst Mayr who were becoming aware of the importance of geographical isolation in real world populations.[23] The work of Fisher, Haldane and Wright founded the discipline of population genetics. This is the precursor of the modern synthesis, which is an even broader coalition of ideas.[22][23][25]

Theodosius Dobzhansky, an emigrant from the Soviet Union to the United States, who had been a postdoctoral worker in Morgan's fruit fly lab, was one of the first to apply genetics to natural populations. He worked mostly with Drosophila pseudoobscura. He says pointedly: "Russia has a variety of climates from the Arctic to sub-tropical... Exclusively laboratory workers who neither possess nor wish to have any knowledge of living beings in nature were and are in a minority."[26] Not surprisingly, there were other Russian geneticists with similar ideas, though for some time their work was known to only a few in the West. His 1937 work Genetics and the Origin of Species[27] was a key step in bridging the gap between population geneticists and field naturalists. It presented the conclusions reached by Fisher, Haldane, and especially Wright in their highly mathematical papers in a form that was easily accessible to others. It also emphasized that real world populations had far more genetic variability than the early population geneticists had assumed in their models, and that genetically distinct sub-populations were important. Dobzhansky argued that natural selection worked to maintain genetic diversity as well as driving change. Dobzhansky had been influenced by his exposure in the 1920s to the work of a Russian geneticist Sergei Chetverikov who had looked at the role of recessive genes in maintaining a reservoir of genetic variability in a population before his work was shut down by the rise of Lysenkoism in the Soviet Union.[22][23]

E. B. Ford's work complemented that of Dobzhansky. It was as a result of Ford's work, as well as his own, that Dobzhansky changed the emphasis in the third edition of his famous text from drift to selection.[28] Ford was an experimental naturalist who wanted to test natural selection in nature. He virtually invented the field of research known as ecological genetics. His work on natural selection in wild populations of butterflies and moths was the first to show that predictions made by R. A. Fisher were correct. He was the first to describe and define genetic polymorphism, and to predict that human blood group polymorphisms might be maintained in the population by providing some protection against disease.[29]

Ernst Mayr's key contribution to the synthesis was Systematics and the Origin of Species, published in 1942.[30] Mayr emphasized the importance of allopatric speciation, where geographically isolated sub-populations diverge so far that reproductive isolation occurs. He was skeptical of the reality of sympatric speciation believing that geographical isolation was a prerequisite for building up intrinsic (reproductive) isolating mechanisms. Mayr also introduced the biological species concept that defined a species as a group of interbreeding or potentially interbreeding populations that were reproductively isolated from all other populations.[22][23][31] Before he left Germany for the United States in 1930, Mayr had been influenced by the work of German biologist Bernhard Rensch. In the 1920s Rensch, who like Mayr did field work in Indonesia, analyzed the geographic distribution of polytypic species and complexes of closely related species paying particular attention to how variations between different populations correlated with local environmental factors such as differences in climate. In 1947, Rensch published Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Die transspezifische Evolution (1959 English translation of 2nd edition: Evolution Above the Species Level).[32] This looked at how the same evolutionary mechanisms involved in speciation might be extended to explain the origins of the differences between the higher level taxa. His writings contributed to the rapid acceptance of the synthesis in Germany.[33][34]

George Gaylord Simpson was responsible for showing that the modern synthesis was compatible with paleontology in his book Tempo and Mode in Evolution published in 1944. Simpson's work was crucial because so many paleontologists had disagreed, in some cases vigorously, with the idea that natural selection was the main mechanism of evolution. It showed that the trends of linear progression (in for example the evolution of the horse) that earlier paleontologists had used as support for neo-Lamarckism and orthogenesis did not hold up under careful examination. Instead the fossil record was consistent with the irregular, branching, and non-directional pattern predicted by the modern synthesis.[22][23]

The botanist G. Ledyard Stebbins extended the synthesis to encompass botany including the important effects of hybridization and polyploidy in plants in his 1950 book Variation and Evolution in Plants.[22]

In 2007, more than half a century after the modern synthesis, Massimo Pigliucci called for an extended evolutionary synthesis to incorporate aspects of biology that had not been included or did not exist in the mid-20th century.[35][36]

The rest is here:

Modern evolutionary synthesis - Wikipedia

Posted in Darwinism | Comments Off on Modern evolutionary synthesis – Wikipedia

Inside the strange world of cryonics, where people are …

Posted: at 10:13 am

On a bright Sunday afternoon, in a colourfully decorated scout hut on the outskirts of Sheffieldin Britain, a dozen or so people are clustered around a table, on which lies a plastic human torso. It looks like the kind of prop that might be used by trainee doctors, the chest cut away to reveal its white ribcage and pink intestines.

But these are not doctors they are members of Cryonics UK, the charity that cryogenically froze a 14-year-old girl who won the right to have her body preserved after her death from cancer, and whose heartbreaking landmark court case was reported this week.

Cryonics UK claims to be the only group in Britain working in the legal but unregulated field of cryonic preservation where a person is frozen in time after their death, and then woken up at a point when scientific advances allow them to be revived and cured of whatever caused them to die. The not-for-profit organization charges CAD$25,000to freeze and transport a body to storage facilities in America or Russia.

Today, members of the group, many of whom have themselves paid to be frozen after death, are rehearsing the preservation process. They watch closely as a clear solution is pumped through plastic tubes snaking around the torso a biological version of antifreeze which prevents the bodys cells from shattering when its core temperature is lowered.

The 14-year-old, known only as JS, was the tenth Briton to undergo the procedure, and the first British child. Her mother had supported her wish to be cryogenically frozen, but her father had opposed it, and so the girl had asked a High Court judge to intervene. In a letter to Justice Peter Jackson, she wrote: I dont want to die but I know I am going toI want to live and live longer I want to have this chance. She learned that the judge had granted her wish shortly before her death in a London hospital on October 17. With money raised by her maternal grandparents, the girl made arrangements with the Cryonics Institute, a cryopreservation company based in Michigan; Cryonics UK prepared her body and arranged for it to be flown there.

Interest in cryo-preservation is growing. Across the world, around 2,000 people are thought to be signed up for cryonic preservation, with about 200 already frozen after death.

A majority are from the scientific community, says Marji Klima, of Alcor, another cryopreservation company in the U.S. Many people understand the direction science is heading.

In Sheffield, Mike Carter, a 71-year-old retired geotechnical engineer who has paid $120,000 from his savings to have his head preserved after he dies. (Many cryonicists choose this option, the idea being that the brain contains all the vital matter, and in the future can be attached to a new body or robot.)

He says he found the idea of death upsetting from an early age. I decided that, despite what was drummed into me at school, there was no evidence for either a god or an immortal soul. My conclusion was therefore that death was followed by oblivion.

In 2008, after reading about cryogenics in a science fiction novel, he looked online, almost on a whim, to see whether it was actually possible, and discovered the existence of storage facilities abroad and the Cryonics UK community.

While accepting that the idea of reanimation was something of a long shot, he says my mantra was, and still is, what have I got to lose?

He says his two daughters are all right with it, and while his wife is not happy, I support her in her views and shes agreed to support me in mine.

David Farlow, a thoughtful 34-year-old property manager from west London, is also at the rehearsal.

Having come across the concept as a computer science student at Kings College London, Farlow went to his first training session in 2008, which became the first of many. His friends, he says, understand once hes explained the idea. His family does not share his interest, but he wishes they did. If I was going to live longer, then Id like my family members to be there, he says.

Critics of cryopreservation say, variously, that it offers false hope in a process not backed by science, that it is unethical to live longer than ones natural lifespan, and even, perhaps prematurely, that it could exacerbate the worlds overpopulation problem.

Aside from the many scientific hurdles that would need to be overcome to resurrect frozen humans, the cost of preservation is prohibitively high, with the most expensive packages at $270,000.

However, life insurance packages are now available which allow you to spread the costs out, an option that Farlow is considering. An office in Devon called Unusual Risks Mortgage & Insurance Services helps would-be cryonicists route their life insurance to cryogenics securing, as it were, a chance at a second life in exchange for down-payments of $75 amonth.

Its like being on a plane, and they announce that its going to crash, and theres nothing you can do.They offer you a parachute, and theres only a small chance of it working, but would you take it?

In the U.S., Alcor and the Cryonics Institute employ trained personnel to carry out the urgent preparatory work on a body before it is placed in storage. In the UK, this is done by volunteers who undergo training in sessions. The organization describes itself as a mutual assistance group and some who sign up to be frozen also train to be volunteers. Cryonics UK says it has around 50 members on call to help with preservation. Their first job is to administer chest compressions, as soon as is feasible from the moment of death, to supply blood and oxygen to the brain to prevent the cells from deteriorating. The body is then packed in ice and transported to a cryonics facility where an embalmer makes an incision in the corpses neck and gradually replaces the blood with a cryoprotectant solution, using a cannula like the one on the table in the scout hut, with a cryoprotectant solution.

Finally, sealed in a well-insulated box packed with dry ice, the body is flown to the storage facility where it is preserved in liquid nitrogen at -196 C.

Mike Carter has now helped to carry out three cryopreservations, including one on a terminally ill person he had got to know through Cryonics UK.

The first time, he says, he was nervous as hell but in the end it went pretty well. Once, he says, there was a situation where the family members were uneasy with it, but they still supported it because they knew it was the persons wishes.

Scientists remain sceptical of the practice of cryonics. This week, it was revealed that doctors at the hospital where JS was cared for felt deep unease about her decision and accused Cryonics UK of being underequipped and disorganized in its handling of her body after she died last month.

In a statement, Cryonics UK said: We always seek to negotiate before acting and our protocols were carried out with the permission of the hospital. A successful outcome was achieved as a result of the determination of the family and their legal representation and the resourcefulness of Cryonics UK.

It said that better regulations of cryopreservation would be likely to lead to more people signing up.

For many, the notion of bringing humans back to life remains very much the stuff of science fiction. But the extraordinary case of JS sheds light on the small, but growing handful of people willing to take a leap of faith.

Its like being on a plane, and they announce that its going to crash, and theres nothing you can do, says Peter Farlow. They offer you a parachute, and theres only a small chance of it working, but would you take it?

See the rest here:

Inside the strange world of cryonics, where people are ...

Posted in Cryonics | Comments Off on Inside the strange world of cryonics, where people are …

UK teenager wins battle to have body cryogenically frozen – CNN

Posted: at 10:13 am

The girl -- who can't be identified and is referred to only as "JS" -- suffered from a rare form of cancer and expressed a hope to be brought back to life and cured in the future.

She died on October 17 but details of the case at London's High Court were not allowed to be made public until now.

In his judgment, obtained by CNN, Mr. Justice Peter Jackson said the girl had expressed her desire to be cryogenically frozen.

She wrote: "I have been asked to explain why I want this unusual thing done. I'm only 14 years old and I don't want to die, but I know I am going to. I think being cryo-preserved gives me a chance to be cured and woken up, even in hundreds of years' time. I don't want to be buried underground.

"I want to live and live longer and I think that in the future they might find a cure for my cancer and wake me up. I want to have this chance. This is my wish."

According to the judgment, the girl's parents are divorced and their relationship is "very bad." Her mother was supportive of her wish, but her father -- who had not seen his daughter face-to-face since 2008 -- initially was not.

At the start of proceedings, the teenager's father, who also has cancer, wrote: "Even if the treatment is successful and [JS] is brought back to life in let's say 200 years, she may not find any relative and she might not remember things and she may be left in a desperate situation given that she is only 14 years old and will be in the United States of America."

However, he subsequently changed his position, saying he "respected the decisions" his daughter was making.

The judge said this fluctuation in his views was understandable, adding, "No other parent has ever been put in his position."

But he emphasized he was not ruling on the science of cryonics, but rather on the dispute between her parents over who was responsible for the arrangements after her death.

The judge also said there was no doubt the girl -- described as "a bright, intelligent young person who is able to articulate strongly held views on her current situation" -- had the capacity to start legal action.

"Over recent months, JS has used the internet to investigate cryonics: the freezing of a dead body in the hope that resuscitation and a cure may be possible in the distant future," he said.

"The scientific theory underlying cryonics is speculative and controversial, and there is considerable debate about its ethical implications.

"On the other hand, cryopreservation, the preservation of cells and tissues by freezing, is now a well-known process in certain branches of medicine, for example the preservation of sperm and embryos as part of fertility treatment.

"Cryonics is cryopreservation taken to its extreme."

The judge ruled in favor of her mother and said the girl had died peacefully, knowing her wishes had been met.

But he cautioned that hospital officials had had "real misgivings" about the way the process was handled on the day she died.

The girl's mother was said to have been preoccupied with the arrangements after her death, rather than being fully available to her child, he said, and the voluntary organization which helped get her body ready for preservation was disorganized.

The case was said by the judge to be the only one of its kind to have come before the courts in England and Wales, and probably anywhere else. "It is an example of the new questions that science poses to the law, perhaps most of all to family law," he added.

The cost of the procedure in the United States -- which the judge said was about 37,000 ($46,000) -- is being met by her maternal grandparents, he said, although the family is not well off. They chose the most basic arrangement, he said, which "simply involves the freezing of the body in perpetuity."

The Cryonics Institute, which is based in Michigan, said the body of a 14-year-old girl from London arrived at its facility, packed in dry ice, on October 25, about eight days after her death.

"The patient was then placed in the computer controlled cooling chamber to cool to liquid nitrogen temperature," a statement posted on its website said.

"The human cooling program from dry ice was selected and the time needed to cool the patient to liquid nitrogen temperature was 24 hours. The patient was then placed in a cryostat for longterm cryonic storage."

The Cryonics Institute said the girl was its 143rd patient.

Its website explains the process as "a technique intended to hopefully save lives and greatly extend lifespan. It involves cooling legally-dead people to liquid nitrogen temperature where physical decay essentially stops, in the hope that future scientific procedures will someday revive them and restore them to youth and good health.

"A person held in such a state is said to be a 'cryopreserved patient', because we do not regard the cryopreserved person as being inevitably 'dead'."

However, some skepticism remains about the science of cryogenics.

Barry Fuller, professor in Surgical Science and Low Temperature Medicine at University College London, said that cryopreservation "has many useful applications in day to day medicine, such as cryopreserving blood cells, sperm and embryos."

But, he said, "cryopreservation has not yet been successfully applied to large structures, such as human kidneys for transplantation, because we have not yet adequately been able to produce suitable equipment to optimize all the steps.

"This is why we have to say that at the moment we have no objective evidence that a whole human body can survive cryopreservation with cells which will function after rearming."

CNN's Simon Cullen and Meera Senthilingam contributed to this report.

View post:

UK teenager wins battle to have body cryogenically frozen - CNN

Posted in Cryonics | Comments Off on UK teenager wins battle to have body cryogenically frozen – CNN