Cloud Encryption Technology Market Structure, Industry Inspection, and Forecast – News by aeresearch

This latest report studies Cloud Encryption Technology market 2020 research report is replete with precise analysis from radical studies, specifically on queries that approach Market size, trends, share, forecast, outlook, production, and futuristic developments trends and present and future market status. The Cloud Encryption Technology market report focuses on world major leading industry players with information like company profiles, product picture and specifications, Sales Revenue, Price, gross margin, industry development trends analyzed.

The core objective of the Cloud Encryption Technology market study is to provide a competitive advantage to businesses operating in this industry through an in-depth analysis of key global developments and market augmentation history. The document has been carefully structured so that companies can easily interpret the current trends as well as future prospects to devise critical business plans.

The report highlights the key opportunities and growth drivers that will enhance the profit curves of the industry over the analysis timeframe. It also lists out the restraints and threats that may curtail the industry growth and suggests strategies to reduce their impact.

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-sample/262626

The document compares historical data with the present market scenario to estimate the growth rate of the industry over the assessment period. Additionally, it tracks the impact of COVID-19 pandemic at the global and regional level to fork out the methodologies that may turn a profit for industry stakeholders.

Key Highlights of the Table of Contents:

Product terrain

Application scope

Regional landscape

Competitive arena

In conclusion, the report on Cloud Encryption Technology market, has been divided into multiple sections to cover each of the market segmentations in great depth. It further extends through analysis of the supply chain and sales channel comprising of raw materials, upstream suppliers, downstream buyers, and distributors operating in Cloud Encryption Technology market.

TOC of Cloud Encryption Technology market Contains Following Points:

Global Cloud Encryption Technology market report describes the business overview, Market segment, upstream, downstream analysis.

Major companies List Cloud Encryption Technology market report analyze the key manufacturers (Sales Revenue, Price, gross margin, main products, etc.)

Global Cloud Encryption Technology market by Type and Application.

Describes Market Competition (Company Competition, Regional Market by Company), the business report estimate the key regions.

Cloud Encryption Technology market Demand (Demand scenario, Regional Demand Comparison, Demand Forecast).

Global Cloud Encryption Technology market report additionally describes regional Analysis (Regional Output, Regional Market., by Region, Regional Forecast).

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-for-customization/262626

Originally posted here:
Cloud Encryption Technology Market Structure, Industry Inspection, and Forecast - News by aeresearch

2gether hacked: 1.2m in cryptocurrency stolen, native tokens offered in exchange – ZDNet

2gether has revealed a cyberattack in which roughly 1.2 million in cryptocurrency has been stolen from cryptocurrency investment accounts.

Founded in 2017, 2gether offers a cryptocurrency trading platform within the Eurozone for buying and selling without additional fees. The organization's native coin is the 2GT token, which is -- or, at least, was -- due to be issued during 2020 following a pre-sale in Spain.

However, on July 31 at 6.00 pm CEST, the trading platform suffered a cyberattack on its servers.

The unknown threat actors reportedly behind the attack made off with 1.183 million in cryptocurrency in investment accounts, which equates to 26.79% of overall funds.

See also:Cybersecurity 101: Protect your privacy from hackers, spies, and the government

In a stream of Twitter updates posted by 2together CEO Ramn Ferraz Estrada, the executive was keen to emphasize that general wallets and Euro accounts were not impacted, nor were the financial details of payment cards used to deposit funds.

However, user passwords were also compromised in the security breach, and it is recommended that users change them.

2together has not revealed how the security incident took place. An investigation is underway to find out how the cyberattackers managed to obtain access to the company's servers, as well as the full extent of the damage caused.

The cryptocurrency platform added that information is being "gathered" to give to local authorities.

In an update posted August 1, Ferraz, Chairman Salvador Casquero, and Director Luis Estrada said the "extremely difficult situation has brought us all a lot of uncertainty," branding the hackers responsible as "soulless individuals."

The executives said that following the theft, the platform does not have enough funds to cover all of its bases and so an emergency discussion took place with an unnamed "investment firm" to try and secure a cash injection.

However, an agreement was not reached -- and so the only alternative is to offer users the equivalent of their stolen cryptocurrency in the native 2GT token.

CNET:The best home security camera of 2020

"We want to compensate the amount of stolen cryptocurrency (26.79% of your position before the attack) with a volume in 2GT equivalent to the issuance price of 5 cents," the team said. "On top of that, we commit to keep looking, at top capacity and as soon as possible, for additional funds to make up for every single one of your cryptocurrencies."

The executives said that if it was possible to use other funds, they would, but in the meantime, the technical team is working on reestablishing the trading app to reopen access "as soon as possible and with all the security measures available."

A Reddit Ask Me Anything (AMA) will take place in the next few days to answer investor questions, according to 2gether.

TechRepublic:Security analysts: Industry has not solved the talent gap or provided clear career paths

"We hope you can see these hard times and adverse events compensated soon, whether you decide to give us the vote of confidence we're asking you for or not," the team added.

In other cryptocurrency news, last week, China arrested 109 individuals in a massive sting connected to the PlusToken Ponzi scheme.

The South Korean exchange was touted as a high-yield investment for those with little experience in cryptocurrency, while also offering a commission for members who sign up new traders. When the team performed what is thought to be an exit scam, an estimated $3 - $6 billion in deposits was taken, and many of the PlusToken management team fled abroad.

Have a tip? Get in touch securely via WhatsApp | Signal at +447713 025 499, or over at Keybase: charlie0

Visit link:
2gether hacked: 1.2m in cryptocurrency stolen, native tokens offered in exchange - ZDNet

Whats Going On With Trumps TikTok Ban and Microsofts Deal to Avoid It? – New York Magazine

Photo: Lionel Bonaventure/AFP via Getty Images

On Friday night, President Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was banning the mega-popular video-sharing app TikTok in the U.S. something he and White House officials had been threatening to do for weeks over concerns about how the Chinese-owned company collected and handled American user data. Said Trump, who says a lot of things, As far as TikTok is concerned, were banning them from the United States, adding that, I have that authority, and that, Its going to be signed tomorrow.

Trump also weighed in somewhat confusingly on a developing (seemingly White House-backed) deal aimed at avoiding the ban between ByteDance, the Chinese internet company which owns the app, and Microsoft. [Its] not the deal that you have been hearing about, Trump continued, that they are going to buy and sell, and this and that and Microsoft and another one. Were not an M&A [mergers and acquisitions] country.

But Trump did not ban TikTok on Saturday; he spent the day golfing and tweeting, and he didnt ban it on Sunday, either. Its still not clear if Trumps announcement was some kind of negotiating tactic, a pure-politics attempt to sound tough on China, or just another impulsive outburst by the pronouncement-prone president. Whatever the reason, the news prompted countless TikTok users to panic, with some issuing tearful goodbyes to their followers and others vowing electoral revenge. Microsoft temporarily paused its efforts to acquire the app amid the mixed signals from the White House. And GOP leaders tried to remind Trump about the art of favoring a deal.

Below is what we know about what has happened so far with the TikTok ban, the Microsoft deal, and what might happen next.

Trump didnt appear to be in any hurry to follow through on his announcement over the weekend, and White House officials have remained vague regarding the possible timing, as well. But with the news on Sunday night that Microsoft was resuming its efforts to buy TikTok, apparently with Trumps approval the risk of a ban seems low, at least for now.

During a Fox News interview on Sunday morning, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that the president would take action in the coming days to address national security risks presented by Chinese-owned software companies which may mean Trump will be targeting more than just TikTok.

Its also important to note that there have been bipartisan security concerns over the app, so Trump and his allies arent simply going it alone in this case. On Sunday, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin claimed that everybody agrees [TikTok] cant exist as it does, including both the White House and congressional leaders.

TikTok has an estimated 100 million U.S. users, having enjoyed explosive growth in the past few years to become one of the most-downloaded apps of all time as well as a rare competitor to Facebook and Google. The company has an estimated value of as much as $20-40 billion, according to Bloomberg. Any deal to acquire TikTok would have to be approved by both U.S. foreign investment and anti-trust regulators, and while there may be other companies or investors interested in a deal, Microsoft had seemed to be uniquely positioned to be able to both afford TikTok as well as win U.S. government approval. Then Trump weighed in on Friday night.

On Saturday, Reuters and Bloomberg both reported that ByteDance had offered to divest 100 percent of TikToks U.S. operations in order to avoid the ban, but the Wall Street Journal later reported that Trumps comments led Microsoft to pause its negotiations to buy them:

The presidents statements spurred TikTok to make additional concessions, including agreeing to add as many as 10,000 jobs in the U.S. over the next three years, but it isnt clear if those will alter Mr. Trumps stance, one of the people said. The founder of TikTok parent Bytedance Ltd., Zhang Yiming, also agreed to sell his stake as part of any deal, the person said. Mr. Zhang was going to retain a minority stake under the deal being discussed before Mr. Trumps late Friday remarks, the person said.

The software giantwas in advanced talkswith Bytedance, gaining momentum toward a deal they believed met the White House goal for the popular app to get bought by a U.S. company, the people said. Those plans were interrupted when Mr. Trump told reporters on Air Force One that he preferred to ban the app and wouldnt support a sale.

Treasury officials reportedly told the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. on Friday morning that the ByteDance-Microsoft deal was imminent. The subsequent confusion, according to the Journal, is because some Trump administration officials favor the deal, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, while others favor an outright ban, like trade advisor (and anti-China hardliner) Peter Navarro who tried to claim on Saturday night that Microsoft could not be trusted since it already does business with China.

Several Senate Republicans and the head of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce expressed support for the Microsoft deal on Sunday in what appeared to be a concerted effort to save it from the fog of Trump. Then on Sunday night, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella announced that he had spoken with the president this weekend, assuaged his concerns about the potential deal, and that the company was proceeding in its effort to acquire the app, per the New York Times:

Microsoft said it would pursue the deal over the coming weeks, and expected to complete the discussions no later than Sept. 15. Such a deal would involve purchasing TikTok offices in the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand; ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, would continue to own the social media apps offices in Beijing. Microsoft may also bring on a series of outside investors, which would hold minority stakes in any deal.

The company pledged that if it acquires TikTok, it would make sure all U.S. user data is transferred back to the country and deleted from foreign servers, and said it would bolster the apps security and privacy protections. Microsoft fully appreciates the importance of addressing the Presidents concerns and is committed to acquiring TikTok subject to a complete security review and providing proper economic benefits to the United States, including the United States Treasury, the company said. It also noted that the discussions to buy the app were preliminary.

On the other hand, the South China Morning Post reported on Sunday that ByteDance insiders have come to favor spinning off TikTok as opposed to selling it, but that could just be a negotiating tactic.

For now, it appears that Microsoft is still on the inside track.

Trumps supposed ban has prompted an outpouring of grief, outrage, and attention among the apps users. TikTok videos referencing the ban have clocked more than 380 million views as of Sunday afternoon. Creators have put out emotional goodbyes, announcements to their followers about where else they could be found online post-ban, explanations for supposed methods of getting around the ban, and in some cases, attempts to dissuade Trump by appealing to his vanity:

On Saturday, TikToks U.S. General Manager, Vanessa Pappas, put out a TikTok video letting users know that their concerns had been heard and assuring them that the company expected to continue operating in the U.S. for a long time:

There has been ongoing speculation, on and off of TikTok, that Trump is specifically going after the app as an act of retaliation against its users some of whom prank-reserved tickets to his infamously under-attended Tulsa rally in June, and one of whom has become famous for lip-syncing to the president. While its never a good idea to underestimate how much Trump does anything because of personal animus, there is typically some evidence of such views from the president, who is neither known for his guile nor keeping his feelings to himself.

TikTok has insisted that no one needs to be worried about user data falling into the hands of Chinas government, but as Stratecherys Ben Thompson has noted, the concerns over data sharing are valid:

TikTok data absolutely can be sent to China, and, it is important to note, this would be the case even if [TikToks] privacy policy were not so honest. All Chinese Internet companies are compelled by the countrys National Intelligence Law to turn over any and all data that the government demands, and that power is not limited by Chinas borders. Moreover, this requisition of data is not subject to warrants or courts, as is the case with U.S. government requests for data from Facebook or any other entity; the Chinese government absolutely could be running a learning algorithms in parallel to ByteDances on all TikTok data.

He also argues that allowing China to control such a powerful and influential social media platform could have dire consequences:

[TikTok] censored #BlackLivesMatter and #GeorgeFloyd,blocked a teenagerdiscussing Chinasgenocide in Xinjiang, andblocked a video of Tank Man.The Guardianpublished TikTok guidelines that censored Tiananmen Square, Tibetan independence, and the Falun Gong, andI myself demonstratedthat TikTok appeared to be censoring the Hong Kong protests and Houston Rockets basketball team.

The point, though, is not just censorship, but its inverse: propaganda. TikToks algorithm, unmoored from the constraints of your social network or professional content creators, is free to promote whatever videos it likes, without anyone knowing the difference. TikTok could promote a particular candidate or a particular issue in a particular geography, without anyone except perhaps the candidate, now indebted to a Chinese company knowing. You may be skeptical this might happen, but again, China has already demonstrated a willingness to censor speech on a platform banned in China; how much of a leap is it to think that a Party committed to ideological dominance will forever leave a route directly into the hearts and minds of millions of Americans untouched?

Banning or effectively banning TikTok wouldnt be as easy as the Trump administration claims, but it wouldnt be impossible, either. According to Trump, he could use emergency economic powers or an executive order to implement the ban, and there is some precedent for that kind of strong-arming, as Recodes Shirin Ghaffary has explained:

If whats being reported is true, Trump would issue the order for ByteDance to divest from TikTok through the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), an interagency committee that reviews foreign acquisitions and investments in US businesses that can threaten national security. The committee, chaired by Mnuchin, has the power to block or reverse mergers and acquisitions involving US and foreign companies.

Increasingly, the agency has beenexercising its authorityover foreign-owned tech companies operating in the US. Last year, CFIUS helped block one of the biggest deals in tech history, after Trump followed its recommendations to stop Singapore-based Broadcom from acquiringthe US semiconductor company Qualcomm. The committee also forced Chinese owners to divest from thedating app Grindrand the health startupPatientsLikeMe.

As far as an actual ban of the app, that would be far more difficult, if not illegal, according to Adi Robertson at the Verge:

The most intense app bans happen at the network level, blocking any communication between the targeted servers and users in the country. Thats the approach taken by Chinas Great Firewall, and its how India enforces its recently implemented TikTok ban. (Australia, which is considering a similar ban, would likely take the same approach.) But American law doesnt have any precedent for blocking software in that way, so it seems unlikely that the White House would be able to follow through on that kind of heavy-handed network censorship.

Another option would be deplatforming:

To really take TikTok off Americans phones, the government would have to do something like make Apple and Google sever their ties with ByteDance (along with any other Chinese app makers). Getting removed from the iOS App Store and Google Play Store would vastly reduce TikToks appeal, even if you could still access it through a sideloaded app or website. The government would essentially be ordering companies to deplatform TikTok and deplatforming can be extremely powerful.

To do this, the Trump administration could repeat a tactic it used with Huawei: have the Commerce Department put TikTok on theentity listthat limits its commercial ties to US companies. The administration doesnt need congressional approval to do this, and it can cite any US company that does business with them (barring special exemptions) for violating sanctions.

The outcome of the U.S.-TikTok standoff could have far reaching implications. As Shirin Ghaffary has pointed out, a ban or forced sale could jeopardize TikToks success and weaken its ability to challenge U.S. tech giants like Google and Facebook, which are already benefiting from massive monopolies. The entertainment industry impact could also be huge, both for creators and for the businesses that orbit them and everyone got a taste of what that might be like over the weekend, according to the New York Timess Taylor Lorenz:

TikTok is known mostly for dance videos and comedic skits, but that silliness can obscure two facts: TikTok has become a powerhouse in the entertainment industry and the primary platform that music executives and talent agents use to scout the next big act. And, at the same time, especially as the election nears, the app has become an information and organizing hub for Gen Z activists and politically-minded young people.

The loss of TikTok would upend large swaths of the entertainment industry that have just been completely reoriented around the app. TikTok has rewritten the pop charts, becoming a new default for how labels and aspiring artists promote their songs. And TikTok is where major brands like American Eagle, Chipotle and others spend millions to reach the next generation of consumers.

Elsewhere, some critics like Wireds Nicholas Thompson have argued that putting aside the security concerns, banning TikTok would be a big blow to free speech, as well:

If one is an avid believer in free speech, how can one even threaten the death penalty for a social media platforrm? TikTok is full of garbage and sometimes hate. But its free and open,even in waysthat other platforms arent.

For the past several years, Ive warned thatthe biggest threat to the internetis the technological cold war between the reasonably open, free internet of the West, and the closed authoritarian internet of the East. Now, with the Presidents repudiation of free speech and open markets, I worry whether there isnt as much difference between the two sides after all.

And there could be other political consequences. In early July, a Morning Consult survey unsurprisingly found that Republicans and older adults expressed the most support for banning TikTok, while 59 percent of Generation Z respondents opposed it. Furthermore, one in four adult members of Generation Z said they were more inclined to use TikTok after learning the U.S. was considering banning it. In addition, NBC News noted on Saturday that banning TikTok could prompt first-time voters to seek electoral revenge:

The popular app that has 100 million users in the U.S. has proved especially vital to many during the coronavirus pandemic as a source of entertainment, community and education, a half-dozen users told NBC News in interviews Saturday. They said TikTok has helped them both unplug from the harsh realities of the world and plug into communities that make them feel connected. Some said that if Trump does ban the app, it could motivate many young TikTokers to vote against the president in the November election.

If it hasnt already, I think this will definitely be a game-changer in young voters going out and voting for sure, Kaylyn Elkins, 18, of Washington state, said.

The Times captured some like-minded views:

For many kids, politics feel very distant, said Eitan Bernath, 18, who has 1.2 million followers on TikTok. This might be the first time it hits home for a lot of kids.

On Sunday, nine TikTok creators with a collective 54 million followers, including Brittany Broski, Hope Schwing and Mitchell Crawford, published an open letter addressed to Mr. Trump onMedium.

Anecdotal speculation does not equal Election Day effect, of course, but Trump banning the app himself, or even just threatening to, could conceivably boost youth turnout this fall. Whether that possibility becomes a reality remains to be seen, but the Wall Street Journal reported over the weekend that at least some White House officials remain concerned over the potential backlash from a ban.

This post has been updated to include additional analysis and information.

Daily news about the politics, business, and technology shaping our world.

Follow this link:

Whats Going On With Trumps TikTok Ban and Microsofts Deal to Avoid It? - New York Magazine

If Big Tech makes enemies of conservatives, it will have no allies – Washington Examiner

Several executives of Big Tech companies testified before Congress last week at a critical point for future regulation of the industry. Though the hearing was ostensibly about antitrust, in practice, it was a forum for members of Congress to air their grievances about the influence that technology companies have, especially over public discourse.

While large technology companies are still undergoing enormous growth, even in the face of the massive disruption caused by the coronavirus, they are under fire from both sides in Washington.

Democrats, still trying to delegitimize President Trumps win in the 2016 election, attribute his victory to the proliferation of fake news on social media. In practice, their definition of fake news manages to target conservative and pro-Trump content disproportionately while ignoring conspiracy theories fostered on the Left.

Twitter, Facebook, and Google (through its search and YouTube platforms), which are largely dominated by left-liberal executives and staff, have heeded Democrats and begun deplatforming and demonetizing voices on the Right.

Twitter has slapped warning labels on Trump tweets and suspended Donald Trump Jr. temporarily, even as it allows the Iranian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, unmoderated use of his account to advocate Holocaust denialism and terrorism and to call Israel a cancerous growth that must be uprooted and destroyed.

Twitter is a leading forum for public discussion. Facebook and Google are tremendous drivers of traffic to websites. Additionally, Googles ad platform is a leading way for publishers to make money, and YouTube remains the dominant video platform for independent voices to express their views and earn money.

The left-liberal tech companies mistakenly think they can placate Democrats by targeting conservatives. In reality, philosophically speaking, the Left is much more skeptical of the concentration of power by large companies within an industry and much more willing to use federal regulatory and enforcement power to squash private businesses. Politicians such as Sens. Elizabeth Warren arent going to be satisfied because Facebook or Twitter removes a few conservative users.

On the Right, there is a split.

The libertarian streak that runs through the Republican Party and the conservative movement is skeptical of antitrust enforcement and federal regulation. This group is more amenable to having the government step aside so companies operate freely and let the market work out problems. This group believes that those who dont like the policies of Big Tech are free to start their own platforms, as they have done with Parler, an alternative to Twitter.

But faithful free-marketers are losing the intraparty battle to conservatives prominently identified in Congress with Sen. Josh Hawley. From the perspective of these conservatives, large technology firms have too much control over the content people see. According to this view, if Big Tech is going to enjoy freedom from legal liability and avoid antitrust enforcement, it should be made to provide forums that are free of bias.

These conservatives see how Democrats beat corporations into submission by taking or threatening legal action, and they believe Republicans should not unilaterally disarm by simply singing the praises of the free market and watching as conservative voices disappear behind a wall of corporate censorship.

There are reasons to be skeptical of Hawley's proposed solution, which would require social media platforms that wish to have immunity from lawsuits to go before the Federal Trade Commission every two years to obtain certification that they are removing content in a politically neutral manner. Such arrangements grant power to the government to police content and would probably lead to even more censorship, as tech companies would probably err on the side of removing any vaguely political content so as not to take any chances.

But tech companies should recognize that if they continue to demonstrate clear bias against conservatives, then Hawley's side will prevail in the intraparty fight.

This would be unwise for tech companies, for in the long run, their only allies as they get larger and more influential are going to be free-market conservatives, who arent automatically spooked when companies become successful.

If Big Tech companies continue to target and make enemies of conservatives, they will unite both sides of the political aisle against them. Democrats already have fewer qualms about going after large corporations.

The solution is not to go in the other direction and disproportionately favor conservative content, but to have platforms get out of content policing as much as possible. If content poses a direct and imminent threat to safety, few would argue with its removal. But once platforms with hundreds of millions of users try to moderate content, when there are large disagreements over what qualifies as offensive or what counts as fake news, they are inevitably going to lead to arbitrary judgment calls and bias.

As private enterprises, social media firms are allowed to set their own policies, so this is not an issue about free speech in a constitutional sense. But democracy thrives on open speech, and when companies dominating modern communication platforms restrict speech in a biased manner, the ramifications are alarming.

Read the original post:

If Big Tech makes enemies of conservatives, it will have no allies - Washington Examiner

How to Apply Artificial Intelligence in Education? – Observatory of Educational Innovation

The dream of creating a machine that emulates human behavior has been an obsession throughout human history. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been in our minds for many years, since Adam's creation: "God creates him from a moldable material, programs him, and gives him the first instructions (Snchez-Martn et al. 2007)." Even in Greek mythology with Ovid's account of Pygmalion sculpting a figure of a beautiful woman who is given life for Pygmalion to love her. In Hebrew mythology, the Golem was created with clay and animated to save the inhabitants of a Jewish city. In Norse mythology, the giant Mkkurklfi or Mistcalf was created from clay to support the troll Hrungnir in his fight against Thor. In each epoch, the examples continue.

Artificial Intelligence (AI), in its most natural sense, is about how to simulate the capabilities of human brain intelligence, so thinking about AI is also thinking about what makes it possible for us to interact and learn. Its applications can contribute significantly to education (Ocaa-Fernndez, Valenzuela-Fernndez, and Garro-Aburto, 2019).

The COVID-19 pandemic has provoked substantial educational changes, among them the migration to virtual learning ecosystems. Teachers must confront the task of attending a wide variety of needs to ensure that students' education continues. Artificial intelligence can be ideal pedagogical support to facilitate attention to our students at any time. Imagine how it can help you respond to each student's questions in real-time while being confident that the student is being oriented correctly. Also, you can take advantage of that time to study some topics of interest, deepen the development of your class, conduct research, build teaching sequences, and perform Mindfulness activities to potentiate your creativity and innovation, to cite some ideas. Wouldn't this be fabulous?

The main objective is to provide our colleagues with the opportunity to build an intelligent pedagogical assistant through a chatbot, which contributes to solving a large part of the students' concerns. The structuring of the responses was designed with the flipped learning approach to provide feedback on class concerns.

What are the real possibilities of applying AI in education? Could AI be a key component in a new educational model? Can you imagine having a colleague who helps us answer hundreds of common questions from our students around the clock or updating anyone who could not connect to the class on time? You probably think that this means having an assistant advisor or a teacher's assistant. Well, this is not so far from our reach.

The journey of artificial intelligence began with Alan Turing in 1936 with the publication of his famous article, "On Computable Numbers, with an Application to The Entscheidungsproblem." The paper established the bases of theoretical computing and the origin of the concept "Turing Machine," which formalized the algorithm concept that would become the precursor process of digital computers. In 1956, at the mythical Dartmouth conference, John McCarthy, Marvin Minsky, and Claude Shannon coined the term "Artificial Intelligence." Even though there was much positive speculation about this technology, AI indeed jumped on the world stage in1997 when the IBM computer, Deep Blue, beat world-chess-champion Gari Kasparov. A profound reflection on its potential began in different fields, like science fiction, computer science, mathematics, social sciences, and even humanities.

A little later, the computer Watson, also from IBM, would win a duel against the human brain in "Jeopardy," the famous quiz show of questions and answers on the American television network, ABC. Isaac Asimov wrote the eminent three laws of robotics that brought us closer to thinking about the ethical problems that the development of artificial intelligence brings us so that we might avoid the revelations of science fiction like that of Hal 9000 in 2001: A Space Odyssey.

In recent years we have seen significant progress. In March 2019, the High-Level Expert Group on AI (AI HLEG), a steering group for the European AI Alliance, drew up a draft of AI ethical guidelines that help us understand the relevance of this topic being attended not only in the area of technology but also in the social sciences and humanities.

Artificial Intelligence can be categorized into three levels that allow us to locate ourselves as we navigate the continuum of incremental innovation, starting with incorporating this technology into our daily lives, especially in education.

Level 1: Revolutionary. Big technology companies such as Google, Microsoft, and Hanson Robotics seek to improve living conditions in everyday life and affect our home, cars, food, and health. An example of this is Google's supercomputer and Sophia, the humanoid robot.

Level 2: Expansion. At this level, AI is used to boost production to a larger scale in areas such as communication, the everyday market, and risk analysis on the stock exchange. An example of this is Amazon's machine learning systems.

Level 3: Communication. At this level appear the fundamental processes of interaction with free software that seeks to respond to users' needs either by programming or emulating mechanical learning of the likely responses that are helpful. Examples include natural language comprehension platforms such as Dialogflow, Botmake.io, Cliengo, Snathbot.me, and Manychat.

In education, level 3 tools are alternatives that respond to teaching needs. In particular, a tool we can call chatbot, platforms that understand natural language, and allow the programming of automatic responses emulate human conversations.

At the University of the East in Mexico, we use the Dialogflow tool for processes oriented to our students' accompaniment with significant advantages that I share below.

The main objective is to encourage our colleagues to take advantage of the opportunity to build a pedagogical assistant that helps to resolve many of the students' concerns. The structuring of the responses was explicitly geared to the flipped learning approach, which facilitates feedback to the students about their interests. This approach benefits the students by readily available answers and referring them to multimedia reference sources that extend and improve their experience.

We decided to load the application on Moodle, the institutional platform for academic reinforcement, to ensure that the pedagogical assistants were customized to the classes' needs. The desired results of this implementation were to equip our teachers with more competitive and functional tools to support our students in accompanied activities within a context of constant communication. The main challenge for those participating in this project is to ensure that the responses are much more dynamic and lead to more meaningful contributions.

The academic work with this type of chat allows us, in addition to maintaining a relationship of communication with our students, to link the conversation to other tools that help our students confront challenges through learning capsules that deepen or engage them in contexts of professional development.

Original post:
How to Apply Artificial Intelligence in Education? - Observatory of Educational Innovation

Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery Market Expected to Witness High Growth over the Forecast Period 2020 – 2026 – AlgosOnline

Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery Market Expected to Witness High Growth over the Forecast Period 2020 - 2026Published: 49 minutes ago Author: Ashwin NaphadeCategory: #news

Global Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery Market Forecast to 2024 is a new research released at Market Study Report and provides information about industry Top Key Players, Countries, Type and Application. This Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery report also states Company Profile, sales, Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery Market revenue and price, market share, market growth and gross margin by regions, Strategic recommendations for the new entrants, Market forecasts for a minimum of five years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets.

The recent research report on the Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery market is a comprehensive analysis of this industry sphere, and contains extensive detail pertaining to varied segments of the market. The report analyzes the market landscape thoroughly to provide information regarding the industry size and current market position in terms of volume and valuation. The study further entails data about the regional business scape of the market and is inclusive of authoritative status of various market players in the Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery market.

Request a sample Report of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery Market at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/request-a-sample/2530581?utm_source=ALG&utm_medium=RV

Elaborating the key highlights from the Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery market report:

Detailed summary of regional landscape of the Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery market:

Unraveling the competitive scope of the Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery market:

Ask for Discount on Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery Market Report at:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/check-for-discount/2530581?utm_source=ALG&utm_medium=RV

Additional pointers from the report which will influence the revenue scale of the Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery market:

For More Details On this Report:https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-artificial-intelligence-in-drug-discovery-market-size-status-and-forecast-2020-2026

Related Reports:

1. Global Embedded System Market Size, Status and Forecast 2020-2026Read More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-embedded-system-market-size-status-and-forecast-2020-2026

2. Global E-mail Marketing Market Size, Status and Forecast 2020-2026Read More: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/global-e-mail-marketing-market-size-status-and-forecast-2020-2026

Contact Us:Corporate Sales,Market Study Report LLCPhone: 1-302-273-0910Toll Free: 1-866-764-2150 Email: [emailprotected]

See more here:
Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery Market Expected to Witness High Growth over the Forecast Period 2020 - 2026 - AlgosOnline

Letters to the Editor – Arizona Daily Star

Stop blaming Trump for COVID-19

Lets get some things straight about Trump and COVID-19. The virus originated in China. They covered it up and allowed it to spread internationally. In January, Donald Trump issued a travel ban on China and declared a public emergency, followed by travel bans on Europe, Mexico, and Canada.

In March he declared the virus a pandemic and a National Emergency. Yes, Trump initially down played the severity of the virus, but so did illustrious Dr. Anthony Fauci and others. Trump initiated historic public and government actions to acquire and manufacture millions of masks, gowns, face shields and thousands of ventilators.

According to a GAO report, COVID-19 required many more PPEs than the national stockpile could store. Trump got big health care insurers to waive testing costs and deductibles for COVID care. Trump launched the Operation Warp Speed vaccine program.

The White House and the CDC set guidelines for states to reopen. Some governors ignored them.

Employers have responsibilities, too

I understand that a national liability bill is being or will be proposed to protect an employer from frivolous lawsuits. However, the employer must first provide a safe work environment in this COVID-19 time: requiring or providing masks, protective barriers or adequate space between workers, keeping the work area and restrooms clean and sanitized. Whatever is needed to protect employees from catching or giving COVID-19 to one another.

More:

Letters to the Editor - Arizona Daily Star

FTSE 100 set to make a subdued start to week with second wave worries, trade war concerns weighing – Proactive Investors UK

There were lots of encouraging trends in the manufacturing PMI but the headline reading was revised down from the flash estimate, which seemed to hit market sentiment

The seasonally adjusted IHS Markit/CIPS Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) rose to a 16-month high of 53.3 in July, up from 50.1 in June.

The reading was a downward revision of the flash estimate of 53.6.

The headline PMI calculated as a weighted average of five sub-indices has posted above the neutral 50.0 mark that marks the crossover pointed between improvement and deterioration in each of the past two months.

New orders expanded for the first time since February, mainlyreflecting a strengthening of domestic demand, IHS/Markit said.

Manufacturing production was raised for the second successive month and to the greatest extent since November 2017.

Confidence rose to its highest since March 2018, with 62% of companies expecting production to be higher one year from now. Only 12% of firms forecast a contraction.

Manufacturing employment fell for the sixth month running in July, albeit to the least marked extent since March.

The recovery strengthened as a loosening of lockdown restrictions allowed manufacturers to restart or raise production. July also saw signs of furloughed employees returning to work and customers resuming spending. Business optimism also rose to its highest for over two years as companies grew more hopeful that the future has brightened, said IHS/Markit director, Rob Dobson.

"Despite the solid start to the recovery, the road left to travel remains long and precarious. An extended period of growth is still needed to fully recoup the ground lost in recent months. This is also the case for the labour market, where job losses are continuing despite businesses reopening. There is a significant risk of further redundancies and of furloughed workers not returning unless demand and confidence stage more substantial and long-lasting rebounds in the months ahead, Dobson warned.

Duncan Brock, the group director at the Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply (CIPS), said the makers were on the march again in July, although the employment situation remained bleak.

Driven largely by demand from the domestic market, clients looked towards building more localised supplier bases as opportunities for trade were unblocked with the end of the UKs lockdown; however, overseas customers failed to deliver any positive news. Export orders fell for the ninth month in a row, exposing the ongoing fragility of the broken global marketplace due to the pandemic, Brock said.

The FTSE 100 was virtually unchanged when the PMI was released; it is now down 17 points (0.3%) at 5,881.

Haunted by trade worries and coronavirus (COVID-19) second wave fears, the FTSE 100 was given a further shove lower by the performance of shares of index heavyweight (), which fell almost 5% after the release of its latest results.

The index of UK blue-chip shares fell a worse-than-predicted 37 points to 5,860.89.

The Asia-focused bank saw its first-half profits slump 65% as COVID-19 wrought havoc on its usually robust finances. The performance was far worse than analysts feared as the group said it would be setting aside up to US$13bn to cover bad debts.

has done little to lift investors spirits as it brings the curtain down on what has been a costly half-year reporting season for banks in general, said Richard Hunter, an analyst at Interactive Investor.

Battered Rolls Royce () continued to take a pasting as it headed the Footsies list of losers. A recent debt rating downgrade and the poor outlook for international travel continued to dog the stock market fortunes of the jet engine maker.

Jitters set in among the investors of ITV () ahead of results later this week that are expected to bear the scars of the current economic turmoil.

The days star was IP Group (), the intellectual property group, which owns a near 16% stake in Oxford Nanopore, the maker of the new generation of COVID-19 tests being rolled out by the government. IPs shares soared almost 13%.

Applied Graphene Materials () said it has signedan exclusive agreement with Ohio-based Maroon Group to distribute its graphene coatings in theUS and Canada. The agreement also gives it a direct route into the coatings and polymers sectors in North America, Applied Graphene added. Maroon Group has distributed speciality chemicals and ingredients across both countries since it was formed in 1977.

Seeing Machines Ltd () saw its revenue, profit and cash all come in ahead of target for the year to end-June, 2020, and it is looking forward to the launch oftwo new vehicles featuring its technology in the coming months. Annual revenue is expected to be A$39.7mln, versus guidance of A$36.6mln and up around 24% on the previous year despite the challenges of the coronavirus pandemic on its core markets, while total income is expected to be A$42.6mln, up 30% on the previous period, the provider of driver monitoring systems said in a trading statement.

() () (OTCQB:NQMIY) said it has appointed international legal firm Hill Dickinson in London to prepare the necessary prospectus and documentation to have its shares traded on a tier-1 stock exchange. "Now that the company's annual accounts have been published, showing solid year on year revenue growth, the board of the company has determined that the company has reached a size and stage of development that it is appropriate to consider what other platforms and exchanges exist to position the company to take maximum advantage of the company's maturing operating status, said executive chairman David Lenigas in a statement.

() has said it is cautiously optimistic of hitting full-year targets after a first half that saw revenues rise 43% year-on-year. The cyber-security company acknowledged there is a lot of uncertainty over the outlook for the rest of the year, particularly with the probableending of employee furlough schemes, but said full-year results should be in line with market expectations if it can get a few major product bids over the line in the next few months and continue to convert its healthy prospects pipeline into sales. For the first six months of 2020, the company expects to report revenues of 674,000, up 18% on the first half of 2019.

() said the Oil and Gas Authority has given the green light to its acquisition of a 12.5% additional stake in the onshore licences that host the Wressle operation in Lincolnshire. It takes UJOs holding to 40%, providing 200 barrels of additional daily output if Wressle comes on stream at an initial rate of 500 barrels a day. Break-even at US$17.62 a barrel, Wresslewill be a significant money-spinner with oil trading at around US$40 a barrel.

() has welcomed the commencement of site works at the Wressle onshore oil field in Lincolnshire, which will usher in first production on schedule in the second half of the year. Operator () is currently overseeing the construction, which includes the installation of items such as a high-density polyethelene impermeable membrane, a French drain system and a surface water interceptor. Europa holds a 30% interest in the licences that host the operation, alongside Egdon (30%) and Union Jack Oil & Gas (40%).

() has revealed that it is investing US$15mln in Energy Link Infrastructure (Malta) Ltd, the company which owns the Alternative Crude Oil Evacuation System project. The ACOES is being constructed to provide a dedicated oil export route from the OML 18 asset, comprising a new pipeline from OML 18 and a floating storage and offloading vessel. Once commissioned, the system is expected to reduce the downtime and allocated pipeline losses currently associated with the Nembe Creek Trunk Line to below 10%.

() has submitted the Transmission Integration Study for the integrated 300MW coal-fired power project and coal mine that it plans to build in Tete, Mozambique to Electricidad de Moambique The study evaluated many transmission connection options for the project, taking into account current and planned changes to the network since the completion of the last study with EDM. "It's a fantastic step forward that we have submitted the final draft of the Transmission Integration Study to EDM for review, said Ncondezi chief executive Hanno Pengilly in a statement.

Bushveld Minerals Limited(), the integrated primary vanadium producer and energy storage provider, has revealed that its 84%-owned Enerox Holdings Ltd has acquired a further 65.1% of the share capital of Enerox GmbH. The investment is in line with the company's strategy of establishing a vanadium redux flow battery investment platform to lead investments in VRFB original equipment manufacturers with attractive upside potential. The Enerox battery product is one of the most widely deployed over the past 10 years, offering a unique value proposition in the industry.

(LON:TILS, ) said it plans to raise a gross US$57.25mln from US investors to fund work on three separate drug programmes. Just over 11mln new American depositary shares are being issued at US$5.20 each as part of the fundraiser, organised by ThinkEquity. The proceeds will be used advance the clinical development of Foralumab, its promising fully-human anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody.

() said it has raised 550,000 via a share placing. In a statement, the technology investor said part of the proceeds will be deployed to maintain its 13% stake in Dynasty eSports, which, separately, is about to embark on a 1.5mln (US$2mln) funding round. Cash will also be set aside additional working capital. The new shares, issued at 0.15p, come with a warrant attached, exercisable at 0.25p.

(), the London Stock Exchange AIM listed investor in natural resource opportunities, has noted that Southern Gold Ltd (), in which Metal Tiger owns an approximate 17.1% equity interest, has published an update about its Gubong and Kochang joint venture projects with Bluebird Merchant Ventures PLC (). Southern Gold said itis seeking to realise value from its 50% equity interests in the Gubong and Kochang projects in the Republic of Korea by offering them to joint venture partner().

Group PLC (), a provider of foreign exchange services, saw a significant increase in underlying earnings in its first year as a listed company. Profit before tax in the year to the end of March 2020, shot up to 10.2mln from 2.1mln the previous year on revenue that rose to 29.0mln from 21.9mln the year before as foreign exchange passing through the system topped 12bn up 32.3% year-on-year. Argentex revealed 380 new corporate clients traded during the period, lifting the number of active corporate clients to 1,212, up 12% on the previous year.

(LSE: ZOE), the London-listed vertically integrated CBD and natural resources company, has provided a further update on the sale of DTU and its Kansas nitrogen assets to Path Investments PLC as previously announced on May 27, 2020, and July 8, 2020. The group said the transaction has not yet completed due to matters beyond the company's and Path's control, but its board remains hopeful that matters will be concluded shortly. The company and Path have agreed to an extension to allow the transaction to complete., it added, and the delay has no material impact on the financial performance of the company.

PLC () (NASDAQ:VRNA), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on respiratory diseases, has announced that David Zaccardelli, its chief executive officer and president, and Mark Hahn, its chief financial officer, will present a company overview at the following virtual investor conferences in August: BTIG Virtual Biotechnology Conference on Monday, August 10, 2020, at 2.30pm ET; Wedbush PacGrow Healthcare Virtual Conference on Wednesday, August 12, 2020, at 11.30am ET; and the 40th Annual Growth Conference on Thursday, August 13, 2020, at 4.30pm ET. A live webcast of each event will be available on the Events and Presentations link on the Investors page of the companys website - http://www.veronapharma.com - and an audio replay will be available there for 30 days.

OKYO Pharma LTD (), the life sciences and biotechnology company, focused on the discovery and development of novel molecules to treat inflammatory dry eye diseases and chronic pain, announced that its CEO, Kunwar Shailubhai shared insight into the companys development pipeline and upcoming milestones during an investor webinar, hosted by RedChip Companies, on Sunday, August 2, 2020. The investor webinar can be viewed at https://youtu.be/l8onUtOvSqQ.

The FTSE 100 looks set to open the new trading week in negative territory as coronavirus second wave fears and simmering Sino-American trade tensions continueto weigh on sentiment.

The index of UK blue-chip shares is expected to open its weekly account 13 points in deficit at 5,887.76.

Traders are unwilling to be swayed by the economic performance of China after the Caixin purchasing managers index revealed the manufacturing sector to be firmly in growth mode. The reading of 52.8 was well ahead of the 51.3 consensus number and above 50, which denotes expansion.

While encouraging, the worlds second-largest economy appears to be staging a v-shaped recovery, traders appeared fixated on Americas seeming inability to control the coronavirus (COVID-19)outbreak and flare-ups in previously only marginally affected areas, such as Victoria in Australia.

Washington, meanwhile, seems intent on reining in the influence of Chinese software firms.

Mike Pompeo, the US Secretary of State, claimed the US government will clamp down on an array of Chinese state-controlled software companies, explained David Madden of CMC Markets. It is believed the move is motivated by concerns about national security.

Whether this will aid or hinder Microsofts potential acquisition of TikTok from ByteDance remains to be seen.

Closer to home, another busy week is in store on the corporate news front with updates expected from ITV (), () and BP ().

Weekend reports suggested the UK oil majors dividend may be headed for the chop with the company set to post a second-quarter loss of around 5.2bn.

Stocks in the Asia Pacific region are trading mixed today as US-China tensions continueto worry investors.

In Japan, the Nikkei 225 surged 2.16% higher and in China, the Shanghai Composite was up 1.08%.

But the Hang Seng index in Hong Kong dropped 0.95% and Australias S&P/ASX 200 dipped 0.1% after the second-most populous state of Victoria declared a state of disaster on Sunday and imposed a nightly curfew for the capital Melbourne.

READ OUR ASX REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION

Ltd () is targeting around $225 million per month in existing business-to-business payments volume from its customer network for conversion to its new Spenda platform.

() (FRA:E4N) has closed its non-renounceable pro-rata entitlement offer heavily oversubscribed, with the $3.56 million raised demonstrating strong support from the companys shareholders and endorsing the company's oro-mucosal drug delivery strategy.

s () () placement of 175 million shares at A$0.05 per share has been strongly oversubscribed by new and existing investors, raising A$8.75 million.

engage:BDR Ltd () is trading higher after recording a 36% increase in year-to-date revenue as of July 31, 2020.

() is advancing its Republic of Korea patent application for 12CQ quantum computing chip technology IP with the bid now undergoing substantive examination procedures.

() has been as much as 28% higher after completing stage two production of high purity alumina (HPA) from its pilot plant facility in Welshpool, Western Australia.

() has embarked on a capital raising exercise and intends to raise up to approximately $1,255,625 in a non-renounceable pro-rata entitlement offer and up to $300,000 in an options offer.

() has completed pump testing of a water production bore within a shallow (6-16 metre depth) aquifer at the Butcherbird Manganese Project in WA, confirming sufficient process water supply for planned production.

() continued to make progress against its IPO goals, finishing its June 2020 quarter with record appointment volumes and the expansion of its Real World Evidence technology platform beyond cannabinoids.

() is focused on expanding the resource base and life-of-mine at its Cape Ray Gold Project in Newfoundland, Canada as the June quarter comes to a close.

View original post here:
FTSE 100 set to make a subdued start to week with second wave worries, trade war concerns weighing - Proactive Investors UK

The Maine Idea: If Lives Matter, Then Names Matter, Too – Press Herald

In what seems like an instant, Black Lives has become the central issue of our time.

Consider: On May 25, George Floyd was murdered in Minneapolis. On June 1, demonstrators were cleared from Lafayette Square ahead of Donald Trumps photo-op in front of St. Johns Church, prompting nationwide protests. And on June 10, the statue of Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederacy, was toppled from its base in Richmond, Va.

The following day, Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, made a remarkable statement. He apologized for his role in Trumps Lafayette Square visit, and also supported removing the names of Confederate generals from military bases.

Milley called the Civil War an act of treason, and said soldiers of color 43% of todays military must wonder about training on bases named for men who fought for an institution of slavery that may have enslaved one of their ancestors.

Most of Richmonds Confederate monuments have now been removed, in response to the same question: Although it was the Confederate capital, why 155 years after the end of the rebellion are its symbols those of a cause that, as Gen. Ulysses S. Grant wrote, was one of the worst for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse.

Not until a century after this lost cause was invented were the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 enacted, putting an end to legalized segregation. But equality of the mind broad acceptance that all citizens should have equal authority and autonomy has seemed as distant as ever, and even receding.

Now, amid a pandemic thats upended societies worldwide in a manner not seen since the Great Depression, we may have reached a point of clarity, where the founding vision of true equality is no longer a mirage.

Young people are leading the way. They are more tolerant, more accepting, and less offended by distinctions of race or gender than any previous generation.

Theres no reason to expect Confederates ever to be put back on their perches, or to be displayed except in museums, where they belong: We shouldnt seek to destroy the past, but learn from it.

Yet the liberation of rethinking often extends well beyond the original object. One thats now roiling institutions across the country has come to Maine which has no Confederate statutes, though before statehood it did have slaves.

The problem is eugenics, the early 20th century movement that advocated selective breeding to, in essence, create better human beings. At the time, it didnt seem remarkable to many people.

Humans have been breeding plants, horses, dogs, and cats for centuries, without many qualms. And anyone who believes that humans do not self select when choosing partners hasnt been consuming romance novels or royal family sitcoms, let alone historical tomes.

Eugenics has, of course, a dark underside. Although advocates were among leading progressives of their day British socialists and American urban reformers the movement became identified with notorious anti-immigrant legislation passed by Congress in the 1920s. It seemed to target the disabled and poor, and its nadir was undoubtedly the Supreme Court decision from Oliver Wendell Holmes counted among our greatest judges in which he pronounced, upholding forced sterilization, that three generations of imbeciles are enough.

The eugenics movement was destroyed by Adolf Hitler, whose ravings about a master race led to World War II as surely as the slave power produced the American Civil War. Yet blaming eugenics for Hitler makes as much sense as blaming Richard Wagners operas; well never listen to Wagner the same way, but no one is currently banning his music.

Eugenicists are being banned. The name of Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, is being removed from its Manhattan Health Center.

And last week, the Jackson Laboratory said it was deleting the name of its founder, C.C. Little, from its Bar Harbor conference room, saying eugenics cast a long shadow over his achievements.

Little earlier president of the University of Maine might have appreciated the irony. Jacksons considerable success as Maines leading high-tech employer stems from Littles insights into selective breeding of mice, still at the core of its world-class research capabilities.

Without Margaret Sanger, there would have been no Planned Parenthood. Without C.C. Little, there might not have been a Jackson Lab. Should we remove their names from the institutions they founded?

Historical questions are often vexed. In this case, though, we might venture a distinction.

The Confederacys legacy is, or should be, its absolute rejection. The Sanger and Little legacies are a little more complicated.

Douglas Rooks, a Maine editor, reporter, opinion writer and author for 35 years, has published books about George Mitchell, and the Maine Democratic Party. He welcomes comment at [emailprotected]

View original post here:

The Maine Idea: If Lives Matter, Then Names Matter, Too - Press Herald

3 Important Ways Artificial Intelligence Will Transform Your Business And Turbocharge Success – Forbes

From the smallest local business to the largest global players, I believe every organization must embrace the AI revolution, and identify how AI (artificial intelligence) will make the biggest difference to their business.

3 Important Ways Artificial Intelligence Will Transform Your Business And Turbocharge Success

But before you can develop a robust AI strategy in which you work out how best to use AI to drive business success you first need to understand whats possible with AI. To put it another way, how are other companies using AI to drive success?

Broadly speaking, organizations are using AI in three main ways:

Creating more intelligent products

Offering a more intelligent service

Improving internal business processes

Lets briefly look at each area in turn.

Creating more intelligent products

Thanks to the Internet of Things, a whole host of everyday products are getting smarter. What started with smartphones has now grown to include smart TVs, smartwatches, smart speakers, and smart home thermostats plus a range of more eyebrow-raising "smart" products such as smart nappies, smart yoga mats, smart office chairs, and smart toilets.

Generally, these smart products are designed to make customers lives easier and remove those annoying bugbears from everyday life. For example, you can now get digital insoles that slip into your running shoes and gather data (using pressure sensors) about your running style. An accompanying app will give you real-time analysis of your running performance and technique, thereby helping you avoid injuries and become a better runner.

Offering a more intelligent service

Instead of the traditional approach of selling a product or service as a one-off transaction, more and more businesses are transitioning to a servitization model, in which the product or service is delivered as an ongoing subscription. Netflix is a prime example of this model in action. For a less obvious example, how about the Dollar Shave Club, which will deliver razor blades and grooming products to your door on a regular basis. Or Stich Fix, a personalized styling service that delivers clothes to your door based on your personal style, size, and budget.

Intelligent services like this are reliant on data and AI. Businesses like Netflix have access to a wealth of valuable customer data data that helps the company provide a more thoughtful service, based on what it knows the customer really wants (whether its movies, clothes, grooming products or whatever).

Improving internal business processes

In theory, AI could be worked into pretty much any aspect of a business: manufacturing, HR, marketing, sales, supply chain and logistics, customer services, quality control, IT, finance and more.

From automated machinery and vehicles to customer service chatbots and algorithms that detect customer fraud, AI solutions and technologies are being incorporated into all sorts of business functions in order to maximize efficiency, save money and improve business performance.

So, which area should you focus on products, services, or business processes?

Every business is different, and how you decide to use AI may differ wildly from even your closest competitor. For AI to truly add value in your business, it must be aligned with your companys key strategic goals which means you need to be clear on what it is you're trying to achieve before you can identify how AI can help you get there.

That said, its well worth considering all three areas: products, services and business processes. Sure, one of the areas is likely to be more of a priority than the others, and that priority will depend on your companys strategic goals. But you shouldnt ignore the potential of the other AI uses.

For example, a product-based business might be tempted to skip over the potential for intelligent services, while a service-based company could easily think smart products arent relevant to its business model. Both might think AI-driven business processes are beyond their capabilities at this point in time.

But the most successful, most talked-about companies on the planet are those that deploy AI across all three areas. Take Apple as an example. Apple built its reputation on making and selling iconic products like the iPad. Yet, nowadays, Apple services (including Apple Music and Apple TV) generate more revenue than iPad sales. The company has transitioned from purely a product company to a service provider, with its iconic products supporting intelligent services. And you can be certain that Apple uses AI and data to enhance its internal processes.

In this way, AI can throw up surprising additions and improvements to your business model or even lead you to an entirely new business model that you never previously considered. It can lead you from products to services, or vice versa. And it can throw up exciting opportunities to enhance the way you operate.

Thats why I recommend looking at products, services, and business processes when working out your AI priorities. You may ultimately decide that optimizing your internal processes (for example, automating your manufacturing) is several years away, and thats fine. The important thing is to consider all the AI opportunities, so that you can properly prioritize what you want to achieve and develop an AI strategy that works for your business.

AI is going to impact businesses of all shapes and sizes, across all industries. Discover how to prepare your organization for an AI-driven world in my new book, The Intelligence Revolution: Transforming Your Business With AI.

Go here to see the original:
3 Important Ways Artificial Intelligence Will Transform Your Business And Turbocharge Success - Forbes