Unconfirmed transactions on Bitcoin network at highest level since 2017 – Cointelegraph

The Bitcoin network has slowed down amid Bitcoins (BTC) new price highs, causing a large number of unconfirmed transactions.

According to the mempool transaction count on Blockchain.com, the number of unconfirmed Bitcoin transactions surpassed 100,000 on Oct. 27. This is the highest number of unconfirmed Bitcoin transactions recorded since late 2017, when Bitcoin hit $20,000.

The all-time high of unconfirmed transactions in the Bitcoin mempool was recorded in early December 2017, accounting for about 180,000 transactions, according to data from Blockchain.com.

The high number of unconfirmed transactions comes amid Bitcoin hitting new multi-month highs. On Oct. 27, Bitcoin surpassed a $13,745 threshold, almost touching its previous peak of $13,970 recorded on June 26, 2019.

Amid the bullish trend, the Bitcoin network faced some issues in its key indicators recently. On Oct. 25, Bitcoins hash rate a key indicator of the health of the Bitcoin network tumbled from 151.1 EH/s on Oct. 24 to 116.3 EH/s.

As reported, some mining data aggregators link the drop in Bitcoins hash rate with the end of the wet season in Sichuan. Heavy rains in the region result in low hydroelectric prices for miners. However, as rivers and tributaries dry up, miners are moving to Inner Mongolia and Xinjian.

The rest is here:
Unconfirmed transactions on Bitcoin network at highest level since 2017 - Cointelegraph

Axion’s Launch is Going to Make Crypto-Believers out of Mainstream Investors | Sponsored – Bitcoin News

This month, a new cryptocurrency project called the Axion Network will achieve a major milestone it will see its mainnet launch and go public. The reason thats so significant is that Axion represents a new breed of cryptocurrency. Its not a utility token or an attempt at replacing fiat currencies. Its an investment vehicle thats aimed at one of the biggest untapped markets left in the crypto-world: mainstream income investors.

It aims to lure both crypto-investing veterans and traditional investors with a stable and reliable return rate thats unheard of in all but the riskiest markets. Its because Axion isnt just a cryptocurrency. Its a time-locked investment system thats purpose-built to generate a stable inflationary curve and to fight volatility to protect investors principal and deliver a high ROI.

If you follow the cryptocurrency market, then you should know that its volatility is one of the major factors preventing most tokens from achieving any sort of mainstream acceptance. As it stands now, the only people who dare to delve into crypto-investing are either unafraid of losses (the very wealthy and the very brave) or the true believers who invest because theyre committed to what cryptocurrency represents. For mainstream investors though, the thought of getting wiped out in a sudden sell-off is enough to keep them away.

But now, Axion offers those investors an attractive new option. Think of it as the crypto-equivalent of a bank-issued certificate of deposit (CD). In exchange for a time-locked investment, owners of the Axion cryptocurrency receive a base return rate of 8%. With bank CDs hovering at an average 1% or lower return rate thats unheard of. And its just the beginning. Axions built to generate income well above that base rate.

The high returns are a result of Axions innovative new approach to crypto wealth generation. It contains mechanisms built specifically to curb volatility while creating self-driven upward inflationary pressure on the price of Axion tokens. It achieves those ends by employing a high early and late unstake fee structure much like a traditional CDs early withdrawal penalty to discourage unexpected token sales, and a clever daily auction system that turns the penalties collected into more value for everyone else.

Its an approach that takes advantage of some of the cryptocurrency markets major features. One is cryptos unique ability to use smart contracts to automate and control market-making functions. Thats what allows Axion to auction off token penalties, and then use 80% of the daily proceeds to execute a token buyback from major exchanges on a schedule fine-tuned to produce price gains without introducing instability. And, the auction system produces all of the funding required to operate, maintain, and further develop the Axion network in the form of the remaining 20% of the auction proceeds.

The other way that Axion works to protect investors is that it doesnt only rely on disincentives like penalties to discourage flash sales that would harm value. It also deploys a strong system of incentives that make it worthwhile for stakeholders to remain all-in for the long haul. It does this by tapping a pool of Axion that was set aside for freeclaim by owners of a different investment called HEX limited to 10 million Axion tokens, as well as for owners of Axions precursor HEX2T to convert their holdings to the new coin at a rate of 1:1 with no limit.

Because the freeclaim and conversion process wont use up all of the reserved Axion, the platform will reallocate the remainder to reward investors who commit their principal for the longest periods. The first 10% of the leftover pool will be split among investors when they complete their first year of staking. Then, the distribution will increase by 5% each year up until the fifth year of Axions operations for those who are time-locked for the duration.

For investors, its free money above and beyond their 8% inflationary reward, as well as a stabilizing force that should keep Axion on course as it establishes itself as a reliable income-producing investment system for the long term. And that is, after all, the endgame Axions aiming for.

Thats what sets Axion apart from other crypto investments the fact that it stands a good chance of attracting new investors who may have been hesitant to try their hand in the crypto market before. It offers everything mainstream investors have come to expect from income-producing investment vehicles, and does so at a rate of return that hasnt been available to them in decades. Together that should make Axion a value proposition that no investor can afford to ignore.

That also means it has the chance to grow even faster and stronger than most crypto projects could ever hope to match. Its a true groundbreaker in so many ways that its difficult to pick a single one that makes it such a standout. And for those who get in early, its a chance to be a part of the future of income investing while using the staking rewards system to supercharge their returns.

It isnt often that the crypto market witnesses the birth of a project thats a real innovation with serious staying power, but the Axion Networks got what it takes to revolutionize its market segment. And its going to make plenty of new believers once it begins to prove its worth as a source of reliable, long-term income. And you can take that to the bank.

This is a sponsored post. Learn how to reach our audience here. Read disclaimer below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Here is the original post:
Axion's Launch is Going to Make Crypto-Believers out of Mainstream Investors | Sponsored - Bitcoin News

Kanye West Reveals The True Liberation Of America Could Be Bitcoin – Forbes

Billionaire rap mogul-turned U.S. presidential hopeful Kanye West has made waves with his controversial bid for the White House.

West, who announced he was planning to run for office back in 2015, has built his Birthday Party campaign around his relationship with God and religionadvocating conservative Christian values.

Now, appearing on Joe Rogan's popular podcast, West has said he thinks "geniuses" in the bitcoin and cryptocurrency community "have a perspective" on the "true liberation of America and humanity."

Kanye West, the billionaire rap mogul, recently appeared on Joe Rogan's popular podcast in a ... [+] wide-ranging interview that covered everything from his presidential run to bitcoin.

"These guys really have a perspective on what the true liberation of America and humanity will be," West told Rogan, well into a more than three-hour long interview that spanned the origins of his presidential run, his thoughts on the coronavirus pandemic, and the future of humanity.

"A lot of the tech guys, but specifically [bitcoin] guys were able to use the new highways, the new information highways, and create the next frontier of our existence while the powers of our political system are still anchoring on the electoral college, which was based around slavery."

West said he'd spoken to two of his bitcoin and cryptocurrency connections, thought to be venture capitalist Anthony Schiller and Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam, in preparation for the highly-anticipated podcast that's already racked up more than 8 million views on YouTube.

The rap and fashion star pointed to Twitter and Square SQ chief executive Jack Dorsey's decentralized social media plans as evidence of a trend toward bitcoin and cryptocurrency. Last month, Dorsey said bitcoin and its underlying decentralized blockchain technology are the future of Twitter and has since added bitcoin to Square's treasury.

Rogan, who's hosted a number of U.S. presidential hopefuls over recent years, said the interview went "beyond my expectations" and that after listening people will have a "much better understanding and appreciation of how this man thinks."

Elsewhere, others in the entertainment industry have also made high-profile bids to change the world with bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.

Grammy-nominated R&B singer Akon is forging ahead with plans for his cryptocurrency-powered Akon City in Senegal, which he has previously branded a "real-life Wakanda," with the president of Akon's akoin cryptocurrency, Jon Karas, recently saying the coronavirus pandemic has made the development of Akon City "more necessary."

Link:
Kanye West Reveals The True Liberation Of America Could Be Bitcoin - Forbes

Bitcoin and the End of History Reason.com – Reason

This is the final installment in Reason's four-part documentary series, "Cypherpunks Write Code." Watch Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3.

"The fall of the Berlin Wall was important to me," said Zooko Wilcox, who was 15 in 1989. It seemed like "the end of history"a reference to the political scientist Francis Fukuyama's influential 1989 essayand a time when "national borders would cease being the walls of prisons," he recalled. When Wilcox discovered the internet a few years later, he saw it as "part of this pattern where borders and distance stop being barriers to people."

Wilcox, who today is the founder and CEO of a company that oversees the development of the cryptocurrency Zcash, was anearly participant in the "cypherpunks email list."The list, which launched in 1992, became a gathering place for a global community interested in using cryptography to allow individuals to communicate and transact on the internet privately and without interference from a central authority. The cypherpunk movement more broadly would go on to influence WikiLeaks (Julian Assange was a participant on the email list), BitTorrent, Tor, and bitcoin, among other freedom-oriented technologies and initiatives.

Wilcox dropped out of college to work at David Chaum's startup DigiCash, an attempt to build a privacy-preserving payment network on the internet based on a series of groundbreaking papers that the legendary cryptography had published in the 1980s.

"Because of the cypherpunks and because of the science papers of David Chaum," Wilcox told Reason, "economic freedom" seemed inevitable. Humans will "no longer [be] constrained by national borders and distance from cooperating and sharing resources and helping each other."

Three decades later, we're a long way from realizing the economic freedom and online privacy that Wilcox and other early cypherpunks anticipated, but since the invention of bitcoin and the launch of the cryptocurrency industry, a new generation of cypherpunks has emerged who are convinced that it's now possible to make good on the movement's original vision.

There was also a divide within the original cypherpunk community over whether cryptographic tools would lead to more individual freedom, free trade, and the spread of democracy, or the collapse of government altogether. The cypherpunk movement's most influential figure was the physicist and intellectual provocateur Tim May, who coined the phrase "crypto anarchy." He saw the fall of the Berlin Wall as evidence that the societal institutions we take for granted could collapse in short order, just as they had in the Middle Ages. (May passed away in 2018 at the age of 66.)

"We saw the little principalities, the monarchies, the religious, the papal stateswe saw those collapse probably as a result of printing," May told Reason,

May penned a one-page summary explaining how cryptography would upend society titled "The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto."

"So I just sat down at my little Macintosh and loosely patterned this after the Communist Manifesto," he told Reason. "Just as the technology of printing altered and reduced the power of medieval guilds and the social power structure," he wrote, "so too will cryptologic methods fundamentally alter the nature of corporations and of government interference in economic transactions."

The idea that excited May and many other cypherpunks, according to the novelist and writer Paul Rosenberg, author of the FreeMan's Perspective newsletter, was that "we can be protected from anything withoutfrom the observers, from the watchers, from the imposers of the past upon the future that we're trying to create."

May was skeptical of the idea that humanity was witnessing "an unabashed victory of economic and political liberalism," as Fukuyama wrote in his famous essay (later expanded into a book)or that it was possible to overcome tyranny through collective action. He embraced a technology-based theory of historic change that was summed up by the movement's tagline, "cypherpunks write code," a line from the mathematician Eric Hughes' 1993 essay, "A Cypherpunk's Manifesto."

"What Eric meant by 'cypherpunks write code' was, 'Don't be one of those guys who goes to a Libertarian Party conference and sits about getting somebody elected to the Los Gatos City Council,'" May told Reason. "That way lies madness."

"Whereas the interesting things that had happened had been technological changes, the telephone, copy machine, the VCR."

"The thing I really got interested in is that you don't just go and ask the regulator, 'Oh, we need more privacy online.' We go fix it," said the cryptographer Adam Back, an influential participant on the cypherpunks list, whose system Hashcash was later incorporated into the design of bitcoin. "Arguing and complaining and lobbying and politics have nominal effects, and what changes the world is technology adoption and society moving, shifting its viewpoints."

For crypto-anarchists like May, writing code meant building systems for anonymous transactions on the internet that made the arbitrary divisions of the political world irrelevant. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway," he quipped.

Online cryptographic networks would be structured like a geodesic dome, a form hailed by the counter-cultural technologists of the 1970s for being in harmony with nature and highly resistant to external attack. "Networks with no owners with many interconnecting nodes," May told Reason, and it "would be basically unstoppable." In a geodesic market, "economics will no longer be the handmaiden of politics," the cypherpunk writer Robert Hettinga wrote in a 1998 essay.

"This idea of a many-to-many connection was clearly going to happen," May told Reason. But it was much easier to build a functional network for cooperation and trade when you can rely on a central authority to enforce the rules. Jim McCoy, a software developer and early cypherpunk, who was the co-founder of the peer-to-peer file-sharing network Mojo Nation (where Wilcox and the inventor of BitTorrent, Bram Cohen, worked as software engineers), recalls that there were many discussions on the cypherpunks email list centered around the challenges of building decentralized economic systems.

"How could we use this weird crypto technique to solve this strange, esoteric little problem that in the real world you just solve because, 'Oh, I know what your social security number is,' or you have to have your government-issued ID"

The economist David D. Friedman, author of The Machinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism,originally published in 1973, told Reason that May "stole" some of his ideas about "the ways in which people might provide the equivalent of what government does in a decentralized fashion," and "then I stole them back!"

A function of government that was particularly hard to replicate using cryptography was the issuance of money. The cypherpunks attempted to build a borderless, internet currency system as anonymous as cash, and that, like gold, held its value without the backing of a central bank.

"Gold makes very good money because nobody can manufacture more of it very readily, to put it mildly," said cryptographer Whitfield Diffie, famous for co-discoverering the concept on which all modern encryption is based. "Whereas bits are perfectly copyable, turning bits into good money is quite difficult."

"Tim May and many others considered electronic cash to be the holy grail because it completed the picture," said Back.

A private and decentralized monetary system, May argued, was a key component in constructing a new borderless world where the activities and assets of individuals would be resistant to government control and confiscation. "You don't physically meet the person if you don't even know what continent they're on [and] you can't coerce them," May said.

But there was another group within the cypherpunk movement that rejected May's vision of cordoning off a new world in cyberspace. Dubbed the "High-Tech Hayekians" by the economist Don Lavoie, this group included the computer scientists E. Dean Tribble, Mark S. Miller, Chip Morningstar, and the entrepreneur and economist Phil Salin. (For more on this faction of the movement, watch Part 1 of Reason's documentary series on the cypherpunks.)

They were focused on designing secure computing systems based on economic insights, particularly those of the Austrian-born Nobel Prize winner Friedrich Hayek. Instead of building a new virtual world shielded from government interference, the High-Tech Hayekians sought to use technology to demolish walls and divisions within the existing world. They imagined that introducing new tools for human coordination would gradually erode the government's ability to impinge on our freedoms.

"We did lots and lots of fantasizing about how the world could be different, but we saw this as emerging from inside the world," Miller told Reason.

Cryptography was a tool for porting economic concepts and legal structures onto the internet, but the aim was to foster new forms of peer-to-peer commerce and knowledge sharing. And the High-Tech Hayekians believed that even imperfect systems can transform society gradually from within.

"The overall arc of world history is toward rule of law, toward less corruptible systems," Miller told Reason. "If the emergence of the world of crypto commerce creates systems that are vastly less corruptible, but under a whole mix of different mechanisms and governance regimes such that they're not always everywhere incorruptible, I think that's fine."

"There's a lot of power in providing people tools such that they can successfully start to act more like you would like them to," Tribble told Reason. "As opposed to, 'You've got to come over here where it's really hard edge encrypted and it works exactly the way we want.' No, no, let's raise people's levels incrementally, and that's an improvement in the world."

For many cypherpunks, the darker side of crypto anarchy was epitomized by the writings of the chemist and electrical engineer Jim Bell, a participant on the email list, who in his multi-part essay, "Assassination Politics," compared aggression by the state to that of "muggers, rapists, robbers, and murderers," and posited a cryptographically protected marketplace in which anonymous individuals could, in effect, pay to have government employees killed with the goal of destroying the state.

In 1997, Bell was arrested and went to prison for, among other things, dropping a stink bomb on a government building. May distanced himself from Bell's writings and activities while maintaining that marketplaces for assassination like the one Bell had described, might be both inevitable and desirable.

"Can evil be done with this technology? Not just the internet, but especially the crypto part of it? Yes," May told Reason. "Deal with it." According to May, Phil Zimmermann, the creator of the encrypted messaging system Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) once told him that "he sometimes regretted ever introducing PGP to the world because it could be used by Al Qaeda or the Taliban or whatnot. I say, so what? I'm not morally responsible. It would have happened whether we had existed or not."

"People want to do what they want to do," he continued. "I mean, they want free shit. They want freedom to do things. Even if they say that it should be regulated, they'll often make the conscious decision to copy music, copy videotapes they want to see."

"BlackNet is a negative consequence," Tribble, a member of the High Tech Hayekians, told Reason, "[and] I'm not interested in creating that. When you build technology to solve problems there are consequences that we try to think ahead of that's responsible development. And we certainly engaged in that. And talking with Tim May and putting on that 'What if I was a black hat' kind of thing was certainly a useful foil for working through those kinds of ideas, but that's absolutely not what cypherpunks were."

Thirty years after its launch, how well does the cypherpunk movement's vision of the future comport with reality? Over the next quarter-century, the internet would make possible an explosion of individual freedom and information sharing, just as Salin had predicted in 1991. But it would also grow into a surveillance apparatus that bore out the dystopian vision of journalist David Burnham and his 1983 book, The Rise of the Computer State.

"Facebook collects information that the East German Stasi would have killed for," said McCoy, who (after Mojo Nation failed) went on to work at the social media giant from 2011 to 2016. "I think that most people are quite happy to hand people all of the information about them online in return for a few pics of your high school friends, kids, or whatever."

By the mid-2000s, it seemed the cypherpunk movement had mostly failed. Then came the global financial crisis followed by massive bailouts by central banks. On October 31, 2008, a pseudonymous inventor named Satoshi Nakamoto shared a white paper describing a peer-to-peer non-governmental monetary system, pulling together technical and philosophical concepts developed on the cypherpunks' email list. Thanks to bitcoin, within a few years, the movement was reborn with a new generation committed to enhancing personal freedom and privacy with cryptographic tools.

"It's like discovering an oasis when you're lost in the desert," Wilcox told Reason. "It's bitcoin that is single-handedly responsible for the current wave of cypherpunk activity."

"It's always messier than visionaries can anticipate because reality is bigger than any one head," said Miller. "We're still on the road in the quest to build architectures that amplify human freedoms and protect us from the dynamics in the other direction."

Written, shot, edited, narrated, and graphics by Jim Epstein; opening and closing graphics and peer-to-peer computer graphics by Lex Villena; audio production by Ian Keyser; archival research by Regan Taylor; feature image by Lex Villena

Music: "Daemones" by Kai Engel used under Creative Commons

Photos: playing with Amiga 1000 by Blake Patterson, Creative Commons, Attribution 2.0 Generic; people climbing the Berlin Wall at Brandenburg Gate, imageBROKER/Jrgen Schwarz/Newscom; people from East and West Berlin climbing on the wall, imageBROKER/Norbert Michalke/Newscom; demonstrator pounds away at the Berlin Wall, STR/REUTERS/Newscom; Regan and Gorbachev, Steve Gottlieb Stock Connection Worldwide/Newscom; people climbing the Berlin Wall, imageBROKER/Jrgen Schwarz/Newscom; Berlin Wall, Getty Archives; David Chaum, Associated Press; East German border guards seen through a gap, AP Images; Francis Fukuyama, John Troha BlackStar Photos/Newscom; Prague 1989, Abaca/Newscom / CreditAbaca/Newscom; Buckminster Fuller and the geodesic dome, C. Y. Yu/SCMP/Newscom; IRS agent, David Royal/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; chiselling pieces off the wall, imageBROKER/Norbert Michalke/Newscom; Mark Zuckerberg, THIEL CHRISTIAN/SIPA/Newscom; Brin, Page, and Schmidt, Minneapolis Star Tribune/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Jeff Bezos, Lisa Qui ones BlackStar Photos/Newscom; Snowden protests, BONESS/IPON/SIPA CreditBONESS/IPON/SIPA/Newscom andDavid Von Blohn CreditDavid Von Blohn/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Mark Zuckerberg, CHRISTIAN/SIPA CreditTHIEL CHRISTIAN/SIPA/Newscom; George W. Bush, Chuck Kennedy/MCT/Newscom; End the Fed 1, Mehdi Taamallah/Newscom; End the Fed, hardtopeel, Creative Commons, Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic; End the Fed!!!, Martha Heinemann Bixby, Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic; End the Fed, Mehdi Taamallah/Newscom; Bitcoin conferences, Aleksandr Zykov, Creative Commons, Attribution 2.0 Generic; Institute of Cryptoanarchy, Michal Dolezal/ZUMA Press/Newscom; John Gilmore at Burning Man 2005, Creative Commons, Attribution 2.0 Generic.

Originally posted here:
Bitcoin and the End of History Reason.com - Reason

3 reasons Bitcoin suddenly dropped 3% in 1 hour and recovered – Cointelegraph

Three factors likely triggered a quick decline in the price of Bitcoin (BTC) on Oct. 25. First, traders pinpoint the $13,300 to $13,500 area as a major resistance range. Second, futures and options markets are neutralizing. Third, weekend trading is seemingly amplifying volatility.

Before the sudden price drop occurred, BTC soared from $13,127 to $13,350. The dominant cryptocurrency rallied swiftly to an area of interest for sellersas more miners moved BTC to exchanges.

Throughout the past week, data from ByteTree shows Bitcoin miners have been selling more than they mine.

BTC possibly saw a sharp correction as it surged to a key resistance range, which sellers aggressively defended.

Some technical analysts anticipated the price of Bitcoin to rise to around $13,500 before seeing a pullback. Before the volatile price action occurred, cryptocurrency trader Cantering Clark said:

After the week-long rally, the futures market started to show signs of overheating. Although the funding rate of BTC remained at an average 0.01% level, alternative cryptocurrencies demonstrated high funding rates.

The overall cryptocurrency futures market needed pullback to reset or cool down the funding rates of top cryptocurrencies. The Bitcoin Fear and Greed Index is also showing "extreme greed" in the market, which makes a healthy pullback a positive trend for BTC.

Meanwhile, the options market also faces expiration worth $750 million in about six days that could trigger volatility.

During the weekend, particularly on a Sunday, the volatility of Bitcoin and the cryptocurrency market tends to increase.

There are many potential factors that could cause volatile price movements to occur. Two main factors are lower the volume during the weekend and the anticipation of the Sunday weekly candle close.

If the price of Bitcoin stays over $12,000 in the next 15 hours, it would mark the first weekly candle close above $12,000 since January 2018.

As such, while BTC continues to see high volatility, the optimism surrounding its high time frame log charts are buoying the general market sentiment.

One popular technical analyst known as "Squeeze" emphasized that the macro view of Bitcoin remains optimistic, particularly as exchange BTC balances continue to drop reducing available supply. He said:

Link:
3 reasons Bitcoin suddenly dropped 3% in 1 hour and recovered - Cointelegraph

Where are the LINK Marines? Chainlink beats Bitcoin with 610% YTD returns – Cointelegraph

Bitcoin (BTC) may be down less from its all-time highs than any other cryptocurrency, but 2020 has so far been the year of Chainlink (LINK).

In the latest edition of its Weekly Insights report on Oct. 26, The TIE noted that Chainlink has outperformed every other cryptocurrency with year-to-date returns of over 600%.

Comparing altcoin performance, the report also highlighted Cardano (ADA) with 224% returns, Ether (ETH) on 217% and Monero (XMR) on 182%.

The numbers provide a timely counterpoint for cryptocurrency spectators as attention remains broadly focused on Bitcoin and its recent gains, which topped out at $13,370 over the weekend.

Enthusiasm around a rerun of the so-called altseasons from previous years has also waned, with Cointelegraph Markets analyst Michal van de Poppe warning that Ether maynot be set to copy Bitcoins successes this time around.

Zooming out, Bitcoin remains the cryptocurrency down the least versus its historic all-time highs, at press time circling 36% against its $20,000 peak from late 2017.

By contrast, Chainlink is down 41%, Ether 73% and Cardano 92%. The worst performers out of the major market cap tokens are Ripple (XRP) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH), both down 94%.

Among the major cryptocurrencies, Binance Coin, Bitcoin and Chainlink are closest to their all-time high prices. While the median asset is down -79% from its ATH, BTC is down -36%, The TIE summarized.

Major cryptocurrency 2020 returns comparison. Source: The TIE

The TIE meanwhile noted that despite its 2020 rally, Chainlink is noticeably absent from social media.

Like many assets, Chainlink recently set its all time high during the summers altcoin craze and has fallen a considerable amount since then. This has caused LINK related conversations on Twitter to decrease by -60%, the report stated.

Google search data for Bitcoin meanwhile has trended slightly up over the course of recent price rises, but remains lower than in August when it returned to $12,000.

Read more from the original source:
Where are the LINK Marines? Chainlink beats Bitcoin with 610% YTD returns - Cointelegraph

The number of Bitcoin whales hit an all-time high during the latest bull run – Cointelegraph

The number of Bitcoin (BTC) whalesreached a new all-time high amid last week's price ascension. On October 20, there were 2,178 Bitcoin addresses that held at least 1,000 BTC. By October 25, this number increased to 2,231. At current prices, 1,000 BTC translates to approximately $13 million.

Based on this data, we can surmise that the whales control at least 2.23 million Bitcoin a significant figure equivalent to 12% of the current supply.

According to data from BitcoinCharts, these whale addresses actually control a much higher 7,902,469 BTC, or 42% of the total supply. Although we know the number of whale addresses, we do not know how many individuals or entities control them. Multiple addresses could be controlled by a single entity, or likewise a single address could be controlled by multiple parties with a multi-signature wallet.

Researchers allege thatapproximately 1.1 billion BTC are/were controlled by Bitcoin's create and original miner, Satoshi Nakamoto. The vast majority of the coins believed to belong to Nakamoto have never been moved.

We can also observe an increase in the hodling pattern the percentage of Bitcoin supply that has not been moved in a while. 62% of the supply has not seen action in at least 1 year and almost one third has not changed addresses in 3 years or more.

ThoughBitcoin saw its highest weekly close since 2018during the past week, most whales and hodlers do not seem to be in a rush to part with their assets.

Read more:
The number of Bitcoin whales hit an all-time high during the latest bull run - Cointelegraph

Bit Digital Bitcoin Mining Company Releases the First Half 2020 Financial Results Announcing Over $10 Million Worth of Bitcoins Earned – Yahoo Finance

Benzinga

As one of the largest and most widely held companies in the world, Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) often exerts outsize influence on the market. That's been especially true in 2020 as Tech companies took on the mantle of market leadership, helping send the broader market both higher and lower, depending on the day.Lately, however, Tech has been in a bit of a funk, losing some leadership to the more "cyclical" sectors like Financials and Industrials as many investors hope for an economic revival. Also, some of what we'll call the "pandemic names" like Workday Inc (NASDAQ: WDAY), Docusign Inc (NASDAQ: DOCU), and the Trade Desk Inc (NASDAQ: TTD) have pulled attention away from the "mega-caps." Still, AAPL's recent rollout of the iPhone 12 and its stock split put the company back in the spotlight.Apple never lacks attention when it reports, even when its earnings compete with three other "FAANG" stocks for attention. That's the case when AAPL opens its fiscal Q4 books Thursday after the close, but with CEO Tim Cook's company still brandishing a $2 trillion market cap, anything AAPL says or does will probably stand out on the crowded calendar.Questions On iPhone 12 Rollout, Sales Of Macs, iPads One big question heading into earnings is how the new iPhone 12 is doing after its launch just a few weeks ago. A move to 5G may end up being a tailwind for the iPhone 12 as carriers give special offers to help woo customers to their higher-speed offerings.However, there's likely to be plenty of competition both here and abroad as other companies take advantage of 5G, so how does AAPL see the race shaping up? And how many current iPhone users will head to the Apple Store of their choice (or online) to replace their phone with a 5G model? Early signs look good, analysts say, but AAPL could shed more light Thursday.Alongside more clues about iPhone sales, investors should look at demand for iPads and Macs. These products, which a few years ago had dropped off the radar a bit, have gotten new life in 2020 given the increased working, playing and learning from home sparked by the pandemic. Sometimes those clues can come ahead of time by checking how companies that make "peripherals" for AAPL products are doing.For instance, Barron's pointed out, consider a recent earnings report from Logitech International (NASDAQ: LOGI), which said that iPad accessories were up 144% in the quarter. This has some analysts feeling optimistic going into AAPL's reporting date.Service Update AAPL used to be mostly a products company, but these days services mean a lot, too. The services business encompasses everything from the App Store to licensing deals, and Services revenue came in just a touch below analysts' expectations in FY Q3. Maybe analysts were just too optimistic, because services did grow almost 15% year over year, not a shabby showing considering the pandemic.Last time around, dollar value sales of the company's marquee products gained ground. Sales of iPhones rose more than 1.6% year-on-year while Mac sales jumped more than 21% and iPad sales rose more than 31%. That helped Apple report blowout 11% revenue growth when a Refinitiv analyst consensus had expected a roughly 2% decline.However, AAPL didn't share guidance last quarter. Will it decide to do that this time? If it does, that might play well on Wall Street, where there's hunger for more corporate insight into 2021 and beyond.A Hot Stock That Cooled Off Apple's strong FY Q3 earnings performance helped shares, which have more than recovered what they lost during the coronavirus-sparked selloff earlier in the year. Shares also got a boost after the company announced a four-for-one stock split toward the end of July. The company's stock hit a record high early last month after the split went into effect, but shares have pulled back since then.Retail investors often use stock splits as trading opportunities, accessing popular names that may have gotten too expensive on a per-share basis. But sometimes buying interest cools off a little post-split.Also, there's AAPL, the consumer electronics behemoth, and there's AAPL, the component of the Tech sector. And in that regard, AAPL has been part of a larger story of a Tech surge, followed by sector rotation and profit-taking.Last month saw a wider pullback in tech-related stocks that helped pull down AAPL shares along with the rest of the industry (see figure 1). After leading the market higher as tech-related names became a popular trade, the wind got knocked out of those sails as investors seemed to decide to take some money off the table. View more earnings on AAPLFIGURE 1: TECH SURGE AND PARTIAL PULLBACK. Shares of Apple (AAPL - candlestick) had been on quite a run since the depths of the coronavirus pullback in March 2020. The same can be said for the Technology sector in general (IXT - purple line). Both have pulled back in recent days amid profit-taking and sector rotation. Data sources: Nasdaq, S&P Dow Jones Indices. Chart source: The thinkorswim platform from TD Ameritrade. For illustrative purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.The Baby And The Bathwater? Tech became a crowded trade earlier this year as investors flocked to big names hoping to get in on the sharp rally. That rally may have been sparked by people looking to mega-cap names because they wanted to be in equities but also wanted the perceived safety of large established players that were benefitting during the pandemic.There's also the "cash is king" concept--and that's one place where AAPL tends to outshine most of its peers. According to company filings, AAPL had nearly $200 billion in cash and marketable securities on its balance sheet as of Q2. That can put it in a position of power to weather potential storms--such as a deep recession--and perhaps make a strategic acquisition or two.The recent pullback leaves Apple's shares well below their record as we head into the earnings report later this week. While that could seem like a bargain opportunity for some, the stock is still up strongly on the year and its valuation is well above the historic norm, which might raise eyebrows.Amid Tech Leadership, Antitrust Concerns The leadership of tech-related companies to either move the wider market higher or lower may not necessarily fade as coronavirus worries continue.But there are other factors also affecting the tech world, such as antitrust stirrings. Still, Apple may not be as susceptible to that as other companies because the iPhone maker has stiff competition from other device- and computer-manufacturers.While that competition may be a boon from an antitrust standpoint, the likes of competition from Samsung, Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ: GOOGL), and Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT) is still a force that Apple has to reckon with, and something investors have to put into their calculations.Apple Earnings And Options Activity AAPL is expected to report adjusted earnings of $0.71, down from $0.76 in the prior-year quarter, according to third-party consensus analyst estimates. Revenue is projected at $64.1 billion, roughly flat versus a year ago. The options market has priced in an expected share price move of 3.4% in either direction around the earnings release, according to the Market Maker Move indicator on the thinkorswim platform.Looking at the October 30 expiration, put activity has been heavy, with concentrations at the 110 and 112 strikes. Even higher numbers have been seen to the upside, with the 120 calls dwarfing others, but with heavy concentrations also at the 115 and 125 strikes. The implied volatility sits at the 43rd percentile as of Wednesday morning.Note: Call options represent the right, but not the obligation, to buy the underlying security at a predetermined price over a set period of time. Put options represent the right, but not the obligation, to sell the underlying security at a predetermined price over a set period of time. TD Ameritrade commentary for educational purposes only. Member SIPC. Options involve risks and are not suitable for all investors. Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options.Photo by Sara Kurfe on UnsplashSee more from Benzinga * Click here for options trades from Benzinga * Facebook, Alphabet, Twitter In Spotlight Today As CEOs Testify On Capitol Hill * Ringing The Bell On Q3 Earnings: How Well Has FB Handled An Ad Boycott?(C) 2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

See more here:
Bit Digital Bitcoin Mining Company Releases the First Half 2020 Financial Results Announcing Over $10 Million Worth of Bitcoins Earned - Yahoo Finance

Kanye West: Bitcoiners Know the True Liberation of America and Humanity – Bitcoin News

U.S. presidential candidate Kanye West professed his respect for bitcoiners during a podcast interview with Joe Rogan. He says bitcoiners really have a perspective on what the true liberation of America and humanity will be.

Kanye West is one of the worlds best-selling musicians, having sold over 140 million records worldwide. He announced in July that he is running for President of the United States this year. In a podcast interview with Joe Rogan, published on Saturday, West confirmed that he is still in the running.

Theres a possibility that I could [win]. Its actually technically possible for me to win now which would be the best option for America, he told Rogan. West said that he is on the ballot in 12 states and voters in 17 other states can write him in. I could possibly win now, he claimed, emphasizing that he will definitely win in the next presidential election in 2024.

When asked about bitcoin, West described, Jack Dorsey decentralized Twitter two months before it really hit because he was talking to the Bitcoin guys, adding:

And these are guys that really have a perspective on what the true liberation of America and humanity will be.

Specifically these guys a lot of tech guys were able to use the new information highways and create the next frontier of our existence, he continued.

Furthermore, West revealed that some people have suggested for him to run for the governor of California. If its in Gods plan that part of my path is to be the governor then thats fine but my calling is to be the leader of the free world, he affirmed.

Do you want Kanye West to be the U.S. president? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Excerpt from:
Kanye West: Bitcoiners Know the True Liberation of America and Humanity - Bitcoin News

Frozen out? Bitcoin price correlation to other assets still undefined – Cointelegraph

A recent report from institutional crypto firm Fidelity Digital Assets concluded that Bitcoin (BTC) shows very little price correlation to mainstream financial assets, based on data from the past five years. Over the course of 2020, Bitcoin has gained further adoption into mainstream finance, which logically might impact the assets correlation or lack thereof. Has Bitcoins correlation changed in 2020?

Ria Bhutoria, director of research at Fidelity Digital Assets, told Cointelegraph via email: Bitcoin has experienced higher positive correlations to other assets over shorter time periods, especially during periods of uncertainty and turbulence, and even prior to 2020.

Amid rising COVID-19 concerns and prevention measures starting in March 2020, Bitcoin plummeted in price, seemingly in step with the U.S. stock market. The increase in correlation between Bitcoin and other assets was a consequence of a short-term liquidity crisis that impacted many asset classes, Bhutoria explained of the March drop. Essentially, a large number of people rushed to sell their financial assets in exchange for cash when times became uncertain around the COVID-19 pandemic news. She added:

Fidelity released an in-depth October report labeled Bitcoin Investment Thesis: Bitcoins Role As An Alternative Investment.Authored by Bhutoria, the reporttouched on a bevy of topics. One particular segment of the report pointed out Bitcoins lack of correlation to other financial assets, including U.S. stocks and gold. Correlation stands as ahotly debated topic in the crypto industry.

Using data fromJanuary 2015 to September 2020, Fidelitysreportconcluded that Bitcoin performed differently than mainstream assets, signalling virtually zero correlation to other markets for that time period. BTC scored a 0.11 in a range between -1 and 1. Wielding a 1 rating means prices of assets travel exactly in step with one another, while a score of -1 means exactly the opposite price action. Any asset holding a score of 0 walks its own price path, unaffected when others move.

In addition to the March drop, multiple other instances have shown a seeming correlation between Bitcoin and traditional markets, at least at certain points. The element of adoption could play into the equation, making Bitcoin more correlated than years prior an aspect pointed out in Fidelitys report. Bitcoin is a young asset that, until recently, was untethered to traditional markets, the report read, adding: As it is integrated in institutional portfolios, it could become increasingly correlated with other assets.

Related:The next big treasure: Corporations buy up Bitcoin as a treasury reserve

Bitcoin has seen significant mainstream adoption in 2020. One sign is a number of traditional financial players, such as MicroStrategy, have accumulated sizable Bitcoin positions. PayPal also recently announced plans for adding Bitcoin to its platform in 2020, pushing the asset further into the mainstream spotlight.

Bitcoins longer-term correlations to other assets could continue to be low, given Bitcoins differing risk and return factors versus other asset classes and its dynamic use cases and narratives, Bhutoria said, adding further:

Over the years, other industry participants have also weighed in on Bitcoins price in line with other markets. Morgan Creek Digital co-founder Anthony Pompliano holds as a long-time advocate for Bitcoin as a non-correlated asset.

All assets trend towards a correlation of 1 in a liquidity crisis, Pompliano told Cointelegraph in an email, which also lines up withBhutorias explanation. He further added:

Prior to Bitcoins launch in 2009, the financial crisis of 20072008 yielded similar liquidity issues. As the public often compares Bitcoin to gold, looking at gold during this crisis adds perspective. We saw gold drop 30% over the liquidity crisis during the summer of 2008, along with all assets trending to a correlation of 1 during the same time, Pompliano wrote, adding: Eventually the assets decoupled later on and so history can teach us a great lesson here as well.

Erik Finman, aBitcoin millionaire who invested in BTCat the age of 12 back in 2011, holds a more tentative approach regarding Bitcoins lack of correlation possibly changing recently. We have to wait and see, he told Cointelegraph, outlining:

Based on all three responses outlined above, Bitcoin seemingly holds at least some correlation to other assets during isolated, short-term events. However, on a broader timeline and scale,BTC continues to prove itself as a non-correlated asset, at least so far.

Read the original post:
Frozen out? Bitcoin price correlation to other assets still undefined - Cointelegraph