Frozen out? Bitcoin price correlation to other assets still undefined – Cointelegraph

A recent report from institutional crypto firm Fidelity Digital Assets concluded that Bitcoin (BTC) shows very little price correlation to mainstream financial assets, based on data from the past five years. Over the course of 2020, Bitcoin has gained further adoption into mainstream finance, which logically might impact the assets correlation or lack thereof. Has Bitcoins correlation changed in 2020?

Ria Bhutoria, director of research at Fidelity Digital Assets, told Cointelegraph via email: Bitcoin has experienced higher positive correlations to other assets over shorter time periods, especially during periods of uncertainty and turbulence, and even prior to 2020.

Amid rising COVID-19 concerns and prevention measures starting in March 2020, Bitcoin plummeted in price, seemingly in step with the U.S. stock market. The increase in correlation between Bitcoin and other assets was a consequence of a short-term liquidity crisis that impacted many asset classes, Bhutoria explained of the March drop. Essentially, a large number of people rushed to sell their financial assets in exchange for cash when times became uncertain around the COVID-19 pandemic news. She added:

Fidelity released an in-depth October report labeled Bitcoin Investment Thesis: Bitcoins Role As An Alternative Investment.Authored by Bhutoria, the reporttouched on a bevy of topics. One particular segment of the report pointed out Bitcoins lack of correlation to other financial assets, including U.S. stocks and gold. Correlation stands as ahotly debated topic in the crypto industry.

Using data fromJanuary 2015 to September 2020, Fidelitysreportconcluded that Bitcoin performed differently than mainstream assets, signalling virtually zero correlation to other markets for that time period. BTC scored a 0.11 in a range between -1 and 1. Wielding a 1 rating means prices of assets travel exactly in step with one another, while a score of -1 means exactly the opposite price action. Any asset holding a score of 0 walks its own price path, unaffected when others move.

In addition to the March drop, multiple other instances have shown a seeming correlation between Bitcoin and traditional markets, at least at certain points. The element of adoption could play into the equation, making Bitcoin more correlated than years prior an aspect pointed out in Fidelitys report. Bitcoin is a young asset that, until recently, was untethered to traditional markets, the report read, adding: As it is integrated in institutional portfolios, it could become increasingly correlated with other assets.

Related:The next big treasure: Corporations buy up Bitcoin as a treasury reserve

Bitcoin has seen significant mainstream adoption in 2020. One sign is a number of traditional financial players, such as MicroStrategy, have accumulated sizable Bitcoin positions. PayPal also recently announced plans for adding Bitcoin to its platform in 2020, pushing the asset further into the mainstream spotlight.

Bitcoins longer-term correlations to other assets could continue to be low, given Bitcoins differing risk and return factors versus other asset classes and its dynamic use cases and narratives, Bhutoria said, adding further:

Over the years, other industry participants have also weighed in on Bitcoins price in line with other markets. Morgan Creek Digital co-founder Anthony Pompliano holds as a long-time advocate for Bitcoin as a non-correlated asset.

All assets trend towards a correlation of 1 in a liquidity crisis, Pompliano told Cointelegraph in an email, which also lines up withBhutorias explanation. He further added:

Prior to Bitcoins launch in 2009, the financial crisis of 20072008 yielded similar liquidity issues. As the public often compares Bitcoin to gold, looking at gold during this crisis adds perspective. We saw gold drop 30% over the liquidity crisis during the summer of 2008, along with all assets trending to a correlation of 1 during the same time, Pompliano wrote, adding: Eventually the assets decoupled later on and so history can teach us a great lesson here as well.

Erik Finman, aBitcoin millionaire who invested in BTCat the age of 12 back in 2011, holds a more tentative approach regarding Bitcoins lack of correlation possibly changing recently. We have to wait and see, he told Cointelegraph, outlining:

Based on all three responses outlined above, Bitcoin seemingly holds at least some correlation to other assets during isolated, short-term events. However, on a broader timeline and scale,BTC continues to prove itself as a non-correlated asset, at least so far.

Read the original post:
Frozen out? Bitcoin price correlation to other assets still undefined - Cointelegraph