The Atlantic The Great Free-Speech Reversal – The Atlantic

These efforts to justify Trumps deplatforming by reference to social-media companies internal speech policiesand in particular, Facebooks willingness to have that decision reviewed by an independent, quasi-judicial Oversight Boardsuggest that the project of platform self-regulation is gaining traction. The important question facing internet users in the United States and around the world is whether the platforms self-regulation will be sufficient to protect the important democratic and expressive freedoms that the American free-speech tradition cares about.

There are reasons to be skeptical that self-regulation will be enough. Perhaps the primary reason is the fact that, notwithstanding their presumably sincere commitment to freedom of speech, social-media companies are, in the end, for-profit entities that offer a forum for speech in order to make money. Will they protect expressive freedom even when it conflicts with corporate profits? Conversely, outside the extraordinary circumstances of the Capitol invasion, will they take down genuinely harmful speech that brings readers to their platforms? Past history suggests that the answer to both of these questions will be no. Certainly the oftenad hoc and inconsistent decision making that the platforms demonstrated during the 2020 election campaign is alone concerning.

Given all of this, it is worth considering a third option that has been used in the past, and could once again be used, to protect expressive freedom from private power: laws requiring that the private media companies governing the mass public sphere abide by basic nondiscrimination and, often, due-process obligations. Even when the First Amendment intruded further into the private sphere than it does today, statutory nondiscrimination and due-process requirements were lawmakers primary tools to ensure that the private companies that controlled the telegraph and telephone wires, the radio and television airwaves, and the cable networks did not use their power to discriminate in favor of certain political viewpoints, or otherwise undermine the vitality of public debate. The most famous, and controversial, example of these laws was the Fairness Doctrine, which imposed extensive, if vague, nondiscrimination duties on radio and television broadcasters, and to an extent, cable-television companies, from the 1930s until the late 80s, when Ronald Reagans FCC repealed it. But the Fairness Doctrine is only one example of a much wider array of media nondiscrimination laws, many of which continue to ensure, to this day, that, as one senator put it in 1926, the few men who control the great publicity vehicles of radio and television do not limit the range of ideas and viewpoints that the public can hear.

In this context as well, a significant shift in political attitudes has occurred. For much of the 20th century, conservatives were the ones who railed against the constraints that federal laws like the Fairness Doctrine imposed on private media companies, and liberals and progressives defended these policies against attack. Today, however, many conservatives argue for the need to impose statutory nondiscrimination duties on social-media companies, while many liberals express alarm about the constraints such bills would impose on the freedom of private companies.

View original post here:

The Atlantic The Great Free-Speech Reversal - The Atlantic

The great deplatforming comes to the stock market – Fast Company

None of this could have happened 30 years ago, in pre-internet times. A group of small investors on a subreddit called r/WallStreetBets banded together to buy stock in gaming retailer GameStop. They hoped that together they could elevate the stock price so that short sellers, including hedge funds and institutional investors, would ultimately lose money.

Social media analytics firm Talkwalker says that chatter around GameStop began on Reddit in mid-January, and the increasing mentions since correlate with rising share price. GameStop stock began the year at $17.25, began rising in mid-January to hit $347.51 on January 27. The r/WallStreetBets investors, who used retail trading apps such as Robinhood and Webull to buy the stock, were making money and having fun sticking it to the Wall Street establishment investors, who were losing money on their short sales.

Its super easy for a bunch of 25-year-olds to transfer $200 from their bank account to buy some GameStop stock, and the trades are free, says Scott Tranter, the CEO of 0ptimus, a political data science firm that has provided market intelligence to hedge funds. Its like playing a video game on your phone.

The same gang-buying behavior began to spread to other stocks. The prices of stocks such as American Airlines, AMC, Blackberry, Best Buy and Tootsie Roll began rising as more small buyers bought in.

On Thursday, Wall Street appeared to be closing ranks to slow down the rebellion. Robinhood, which offers free stock trades but makes millions selling trading data to hedge funds and institutional investors, said it was pausing sales of GameStop and 11 other stocks through its app. Brokerage houses began placing guardrails around buys of GameStop. The trading apps M1, Webull, and Public did the same, but all three said they were forced to do so because the clearing house they use, Apex, made it more expensive to process buys. Later Thursday, all three announced that theyd made agreements with Apex to allow the buying and selling of GameStop shares. Robinhood, which has its own clearing house, said it would resume buying of GameStop and other affected stocks on Friday.

But the damage was done. The Empire struck back. GameStop stock lost 44% of its value during regular trading hours Thursday, closing down $152 at $193.60. Short sellers at least cut their losses, and r/WallStreetBets investors lost market value in their shares.

Naturally, the r/WallStreetBets traders were furious.They have their Robinhood accounts where trades are free, and they thought this was a free market economy, and as soon as they make some money, all of a sudden this app stops them from making money and then these people go bonkers, says Tranter.

The whole affair has the look and feel of class warfare, as many pointed out on Twitter.

These GameStop traders dont distinguish between hedge funds and the big banks that got bailed out after the 2008 crisis, and the banks that are screwing them on student loans, mortgage rates, and bank fees, Tranter says. These traders think its all just these rich people who rig the system and operate under a different set of rules when things dont go their waylike with these GameStop trades.

The strength of the r/WallStreetBets investors is in their numbers. Individually, they can play with much less money and much less risk.

If the stock price goes down, theyre only out a couple hundred dollars and can go to sleep knowing they did their part to stick it to The Man. Theyre just buying and selling stocks. Few if any hold enough money in reserve to play the extremely risky short-sell game the hedge funds and institutional investors play.

But the cumulative effect of their actions is large, and a real threat to big funds.

The GameStop stock will eventually return to a price more in line with the real value of the company, but the hedge funds dont have the luxury to wait. They have to close out their short-sell options every Friday. If the GameStop stock remains high on Friday, the big funds will be on the hook to pay for all the options they bought on the belief the stock would go down. That could cost millions.

Many of the r/WallStreetBets investor group say they plan to hold their GameStop positions at least until tomorrow. One large hedge fund, Melvin Capital, reportedly had to take an emergency loan to cover the cost of losses it took from short selling GameStop stock.

Robinhoods halt on stock buys Thursday may have been good for the big funds, but not everybody agrees it was the right thing to do. One thing is clear: gang investing is legal and isnt going to go away. Will Robinhood suddenly halt trading on certain stocks when this happens again?

The whole situation has attracted the attention of lawmakers including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Sen. Ted Cruz, and Rep. Rashida Tlaib, and some are calling for Congressional hearings. The White House has said it is watching the situation closely.

This . . . showed how the cards are stacked against the little guy in favor of billionaire Wall Street Traders, said Rep. Ro Khanna in a statement Thursday. While retail trading in some cases, like on Robinhood, blocked the purchasing of GameStop, hedge funds were still allowed to trade the stock. We need more regulation and equality in the markets.

Original post:

The great deplatforming comes to the stock market - Fast Company

Why deplatforming can be a necessary last resort – The Runner

Listen to Post

Image is an artistic representation not meant to display accurate statistics. (Kristen Frier)

In 2018, a manager at The Teahouse restaurant in Vancouver was fired after refusing to serve a customer wearing a MAGA hat.

In a public statement justifying the decision, Sequoia Company of Restaurants said they cannot discriminate against someone based on their support for the current administration in the United States or any other bona fide political party.

Its wonderfully ironic that Sequoia used the term bona fide to describe a party whose president publicly lied so often that the Toronto Stars former Washington bureau chief had to turn fact-checking the administrations false and misleading claims into his full time job.

And according to the manager who was fired, the customer wasnt refused service because he said he voted for Trump or was wearing a GOP pin, but because he was wearing a specific hat, which has been repeatedly connected to intolerant and hateful ideologies and policies.

Because of this, I believe the manager was in the right. Opposing a symbol and what it stands for is not the same as opposing another persons ability to support a political belief.

MAGA hats and little elephant pins do not have the same historical narrative, nor do they represent the same collection of ideas. Combining the two gives a set of intolerant ideologies like misogyny, racism, homophobia, and transphobia a semantic smokescreen, allowing them to masquerade as genuine political ideas on par with things like economic policies and the protection of personal rights and liberty.

On the other hand, politicizing intolerant ideas and misinformation can also be used as a way to avoid having to fairly respond to rational counterarguments, which is why hateful ideologies and conspiracy theories often come packaged with anti-intellectualism, or claims that science and academic rigour cannot be trusted. Using evidence-based arguments to disprove conspiracy theories, or using reason to deny justifications for bigotry can then be reframed as a confrontation of someones sanctified political views, and a denial of their right to freedom of speech.

Nothing about misinformation or bigotry meaningfully changes when they are presented as political views instead of rational positions but by attaching them to icons, slogans, and bright red hats, they are made manifest in a way that empowers them, and gives them legitimacy. This empowerment and legitimacy is one reason why political interests need flags, why companies need brands, and why sports teams need logos.

Its also why they need Twitter accounts, because symbols and ideas need an audience in order to exert influence, whether thats millions of followers on social media, or a dining room full of customers at The Tea House.

In 2018, U.S. researchers studying the use of #MAGA on Twitter found that mapping the growing network of users who posted it provided several unique and illustrative instances of both extremist conspiratorial conversational spaces and overtly White supremacist slogans, spaces, and networks.

The study says that #MAGA created an organizational space to engage in a global White supremacist discourse, which can be enabled by examining the technological and social affordances within Twitter.

Providing a platform for the expression of ideas is an implicit acceptance of their validity, and a statement that they deserve as much attention and amplification as any other ideas shared on that platform.

In this space, hatred and lies are presented as equals to respect and truth, when rationally-speaking, almost anyone would agree that they are not. Despite this, people rarely do anything about it, and even when they do, they can face accusations of political suppression like Twitter and the former manager at The Tea House did.

This is part of the paradox of tolerance theory coined by Karl Popper, an influential philosopher whose writing contributed to our modern concepts of truth, democracy, scientific philosophy, and how reality corresponds with facts.

In 1945, Popper wrote that if we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.

He supported suppressing intolerant philosophies as a last resort, for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.

This once-hypothetical scenario became a reality when Trumps supporters many of whom were proudly wearing MAGA hats fought their way into the U.S. capitol, and killed five people.

Twitters decision to deplatform those who work to spread intolerance or misinformation is a way of stopping that from happening again. Its a necessary last resort, when rational discourse becomes impossible, when hate suppresses reason, and when logic and mutual understanding of facts and truth are being undermined and disregarded.

Continued here:

Why deplatforming can be a necessary last resort - The Runner

Ben Shapiro On The ‘Woke’ Left’s Quest To Deplatform Conservative Media – FOX News Radio

Listen To The Full Interview Below:

On today's Guy Benson Show, Ben Shapiro, Editor Emeritus of TheDailyWire.com and host of "The Ben Shapiro Show" talked about the threat from the woke left to deplatform conservative media and conservative thought.

Ben Shapiro said,

"We all understand your goal here. Your goal is you lump us all together and then you seek to the deplatform, us, ban us. Get neutral service providers to stop providing us services. And you mentioned the, you mentioned the attempt to have social media take down particular websites or the attempts to go after, you know, podcasting. They're talking about taking away podcasting platforms now. They're talking about maybe Apple should delist particular podcasts. Or YouTube should delist particular content creators. They're suggesting that Amazon Web Services shouldn't just do what it did to Parler. They should do it pretty much everybody."

Shapiro added,

"This is the constant battle. And it's a bunch of us on one side who have literally never called for anybody to be the deplatform. I mean, that's the amazing thing about this. It's a completely one sided battle. It's one side that's just trying to survive and the other side is trying to wipe it out, ideologically speaking, and using all methods of power at its disposal, including corporate power. And then they wonder why conservatives feel like they're under assault. And then just because you, just because you seem paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you. And right now, every major institution in this country is controlled not just by liberals, but unfortunately, increasingly by a woak left that is seeking the destruction of an entire side of the political debate. It's amazing."

Link:

Ben Shapiro On The 'Woke' Left's Quest To Deplatform Conservative Media - FOX News Radio

Crypto industry urges government to reconsider ban – Mint

NEW DELHI: The domestic cryptocurrency industry has been urging the Center to reconsider its apparent plan to ban private cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoin, in India. Industry stakeholders said while the governments intention to create a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is a welcome move, the definition of what the government considers private cryptocurrencies" will be important.

The Indian governments plan to create a facilitative framework for creation of the official digital currency to be issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)," was announced in the agenda for the upcoming Budget session of Parliament. The legislation seeks to prohibit all private cryptocurrencies in India", the agenda said. It is meant to allow the use of blockchain technology, which is the underlying tech behind cryptocurrencies, but many expect that it will make the use of currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum illegal in the country.

Also Read | How India can fight vaccine hesitancy

The digital currency bill to be introduced in the Lok Sabha is a welcome step. Its success will depend on the details, particularly the definition of what the bill calls 'private cryptocurrencies'. This is not a common term. Bitcoin is not privately owned by anyone. It is a public good, like the internet," said Rahul Pagdipati, chief executive officer (CEO) of crypto exchange and wallet ZebPay.

Industry executives say the governments concern is likely about the possible use of cryptocurrency as an alternative to the Indian rupee (INR). They argued that cryptocurrencies instead are similar to assets such as gold. As an industry, were in sync with the fact that INR is the only legal tender in India and about crypto being an asset/utility that people buy and sell," said Nishcal Shetty, founder of WazirX, Indias largest cryptocurrency exchange, which was acquired by Binance, the largest crypto exchange in the world.

Bitcoin and most crypto assets are more like gold and not an alternative to government-issued legal tender," said Pagdipati. Crypto assets and digital government currency can coexist and together," he said.

The industry has urged the government to consult stakeholders before coming to a decision. We urge the government to take the opinion of all the stakeholders before taking a decision that may affect the livelihood of the entire workforce employed in the digital asset industry in India," said Shivam Thukral, CEO of BuyUcoin, another cryptocurrency exchange and wallet. We have faith in the government and hope that this bill will move India forwards, not backwards," said Pagdipati.

India has considered banning cryptocurrencies once earlier. The government had floated a draft bill for Banning of Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill" in 2019. That bill proposed a fine or imprisonment of up to 10 years, or both, for mining, holding, selling, trade, issuance, disposal or use of crypto in India. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had also issued a circular in 2019 that banned banks and other regulated entities from doing business with crypto companies. This was struck down by the Supreme Court last year.

According to data from analysis firm Venture Intelligence, investments worth $24 million went into crypto firms in 2020, after the Supreme Courts decision, up from a mere $5 million in the year before. Crypto firms in India have also experienced a successful year since the lockdowns in March 2020. Trading on crypto exchanges increased manifold, while Bitcoins sudden bull run in December brought in more investors too. The governments current move threatens to put the future of this industry in disarray once again.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters

* Enter a valid email

* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

View original post here:
Crypto industry urges government to reconsider ban - Mint

Government Will Explore Blockchain for Digital Economy, Union Minister Says About India’s Own Cryptocurre… – Gadgets 360

The government will explore the use of blockchain technology for digital economy, Minister of State for Finance Anurag Singh Thakur said in response to a question raised in Rajya Sabha on Tuesday. The comments from the Ministry of Finance come just days after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) mentioned plans to bring a digital version of the Indian Rupee. The central bank stated that it was exploring the possibility as to whether there was a need for a digital version of fiat currency, and in case there was then how to operationalise it.

Thakur also reiterated that the government's current stance on Bitcoin and other crypto-based payment systems is that they are illegal: It was announced in the Budget Speech of year 2018-19 that the government does not consider cryptocurrencies legal tender or coins and will take all measures to eliminate use of these crypto-assets in financing illegitimate activities or as part of the payment system. He was responding to Member of Parliament Sanjay Raut on whether the government is considering the possibility of introducing India's own cryptocurrency.

In April 2018, the RBI had effectively banned cryptocurrency transactions via banks and e-wallets in the country. It was initially supported by the Supreme Court, though the top court later quashed the ban in March last year.

Earlier this week, the government listed a bill titled The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021 that is aimed to provide a framework for creation of an official digital currency to be issued by the RBI and prohibit all existing private cryptocurrencies. Experts, however, believe that it would take some time for the country to bring any changes.

Here is the full text of the question and answer between MoS Finance Anurag Thakur and Member of Parliament Sanjay Raut in Rajya Sabha.

Sanjay Raut:

Will the Minister of Finance be pleased to state:-

(a) whether Government is aware that many business companies are using cryptocurrency for international transactions during the last one year:

(b) if so, the details thereof and Government's response thereto:

(c) whether Government is considering the possibility of introducing India's own cryptocurrency; and

(d) if so, the details thereof and, if not, the reasons therefor?

Answer

Minister of State in the Ministry of Finance

Shri Anurag Singh Thakur

(a): No, Sir.

(b): In view of reply to part (a) above, the question does not arise.

(c) and (d): No, Sir. It was announced in the Budget Speech of year 2018-19 that the Government does not consider crypto-currencies legal tender or coins and will take all measures to eliminate use of these crypto-assets in financing illegitimate activities or as part of the payment system. The government will explore use of the block chain technology proactively for ushering in digital economy.

What will be the most exciting tech launch of 2021? We discussed this on Orbital, our weekly technology podcast, which you can subscribe to via Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, or RSS, download the episode, or just hit the play button below.

See the rest here:
Government Will Explore Blockchain for Digital Economy, Union Minister Says About India's Own Cryptocurre... - Gadgets 360

For cryptocurrency farmers, the harvest continues | Business World | wenatcheeworld.com – wenatcheeworld.com

EAST WENATCHEE In some ways, mining Bitcoin is like drilling for oil.

If you cant cover your cost at $50 a barrel, youre not going to be around long enough to enjoy the $100 a barrel spikes, said Malachi Salcido, one of North Central Washingtons most prominent cryptocurrency miners.

Bitcoin, the worlds most popular digital currency, has seen its share of dips and spikes over the past decade. In the past year alone the price quintupled to a record $41,940 in early January.

For the few dozen cryptocurrency miners in the Wenatchee Valley, it couldnt come soon enough. Last January the Douglas County PUD approved a new policy that raises their power rates 10% every six months for five years.

Add on regularly needed technology upgrades and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and some mining operations were looking at much bleaker financial outlooks when the price was still hovering somewhere under $7,500 last year.

Basically time was running out for us given that the electricity price was going up. We were getting close to just breaking even and then luckily the Bitcoin price shot up. That does put us in the black for now, but there is quite a bit of infrastructure cost that we have to recoup from a year-on-year basis, said Raymond Walintukan, director of mining operations for Bitmain, which operates a mine in East Wenatchee.

Mine now, sell later

As the price of a cryptocurrencyrises, so does the interest from miners of all sizes looking to grab a piece of the pie.

Its why some mining operations, like Bitmains 12-megawatt facility mine near Pangborn Memorial Airport, focus their efforts on mining as fast as possible when the price is low, Walintukan said.

When the price does go up more people turn on their machines, so the yield comes down, he said. Then we end up mining less over time, so the best strategy would be to mine as much Bitcoin as you can while the price is low because no ones mining the coins. Then you sell it when the price is higher.

In those low periods theyll switch out their powerful computers to the latest models to maximize output. Thats an easier proposition for Bitmain they also manufacture the machines. The Chinese company is one of the worlds largest cryptocurrency hardware producers.

Even so, their mining operation in East Wenatchee spends somewhere between $10 to $30 million a year on new equipment, Walintukan said.

Its a constant rush to have the latest and greatest computer network, which is needed just to keep pace with the competition, Walintukan said.

You might yield 10% less Bitcoin every month and thats just because everybody is buying new machines, he said. Its like an arms race where you have to keep up with it.

Those machines commonly run 24/7, seven days a week meaning they frequently need repair and maintenance. For Bitmain, thats another revenue opportunity.

It ran a repair facility in Malaga for a while before scaling it down as the Bitcoin price fell and the company restructured. The company projects the price will be high enough, and consistent enough, to take another run at a repair operation.

Its now expanding three repair centers in the country: one on the east coast, one in the center of the U.S. and one in the Wenatchee Valley. Walintukan is already recruiting and training local workers.

Rough estimates say there may be 60,000 cryptocurrency machines in the U.S. that need repair, Walintukan said. Shipping them domestically rather than over to the companys headquarters in China saves customers time and money, he said.

Any of those machines that need repair on the western seaboard would come to Wenatchee, he said.

Trading volatility for stability

In 2018, Politico Magazine described the mid-Columbia Basin as a would-be El Dorado for the miners that flocked to the area to prospect for digital riches.

Many miners remain but the local industrys landscape has changed significantly since then, Salcido said.

At this point it appears that the kind of wild west, gold-rush stampede phase is over, he said. I think that was done probably about a year ago.

Salcido entered the industry in 2013 and his company Salcido Enterprises now has several facilities in NCW, including Cashmere and East Wenatchee. Its that scale which has allowed Salcido to maintain through the cycling cryptocurrency prices, he said.

There will continue to be increased interest but the difference between now and 2016 to 2017, which is when it was really on the radar and consciousness of the general population, is its really an economies of scale opportunity, he said. People cant run machines out of their garage so its only going to be relatively large and relatively well-established operations that are going to be in the space going forward.

Salcido expects that consolidation will help the power utilities, keepers of miners most valuable resource, get their arms around the industry.

Now utilities can continue to execute on their strategy of managing risk for whats best for the most, he said. I would suspect over these next years it gets a lot easier for them to interact with a few relatively large data center-like customers. Theres just a lot less risk.

And leveling off the explosive growth of the past few years was one of the primary drivers behind Douglas PUDs power rate changes in 2020.

Certainly we didnt have an unlimited resource for them and at that time, and probably now, they would be seeking an unlimited amount of resource to pursue this, PUD General Manager Gary Ivory said in a January interview.

The PUD had 22 cryptocurrency customers last year compared to 27 the year before. Its revenue from that customer class also dipped from around $7.1 million to $5.6 million.

But with the volatility of the market and the effects of the pandemic, those changes are hardly conclusive. Also, only one of the five year's worth of power rate increases has gone into effect so far, meaning the long-term effects arent fully known.

New cryptocurrency miners or even larger data centers that move to the county seeking power will now need to buy it on the wholesale market rather than the PUD-run Wells Dam.

Existing customers have gone up or down in power usage within their existing contracts, but the PUD has not yet entered into a wholesale contract with a new customer, Ivory said.

We want businesses and residents in Douglas County to grow and to flourish here for generations to come, he said. We hope to be here for generations to come to help that growth happen and if we gave it away to just a few small customers, it just didnt make sense to our commission or our constituents.

Salcidos future growth is all about infrastructure. His facilities support global cryptocurrency networks as their usage increases, it adds further value to his work.

People dont really understand that its machines on shelves that make a cryptocurrency network function, he said. So our longterm business plan is we would be an operator in the Central Washington region that is one of the locations that elevates the network that runs cryptocurrency that people utilize around the world.

One recent example is PayPal, which in October announced a new service that allows customers to buy, hold and sell cryptocurrency directly from their PayPal accounts. It can also be used as a funding source at the companys 26 million merchants.

"The shift to digital forms of currencies is inevitable, bringing with it clear advantages in terms of financial inclusion and access; efficiency, speed and resilience of the payments system; and the ability for governments to disburse funds to citizens quickly," President and CEO Dan Schulman said in a news release.

As consumer use grows, Salcido expects his primary revenue to shift from selling cryptocurrency to the fees that are collected when those consumer transactions happen on the network. Its comparable to the transaction fees collected by Mastercard or Visa, he said.

While the pandemic has had negative impacts on large swaths of the economy, its also pushed many consumers and businesses to embrace digital tools. That helps reinforce the usefulness of a digital currency network, Salcido said.

Its accelerated technology adoption so well end up benefiting from that. We are benefiting from that, just in the immediate term that doesnt translate into dollars that pay the bills, he said. ... The utilization of cryptocurrency is really just beginning. This is still the very early beginnings of the adoption and lifecycle of cryptocurrency.

Link:
For cryptocurrency farmers, the harvest continues | Business World | wenatcheeworld.com - wenatcheeworld.com

India to Prohibit Bitcoin, Other Types of Cryptocurrency – Grit Daily

India plans to prohibit Bitcoin and all other private Cryptocurrencies in the country except for the official digital currency issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Instead, the Indian government intends to introduce a facilitative framework for creating the countrys official digital currency at the current budget session of Parliament.

The Bulletin (Lok Sabha) introduced to Parliament reads that, although private Cryptocurrencies will be disallowed, certain exceptions will be made to promote the underlying technology [blockchain] of Cryptocurrency and its uses.

The government panel recommended that India ban private Cryptocurrency before in 2018, going so far as proposing that offenders serve up to 10 years of jail time. The panel, at that time, explored Indias own digital versions of currency and how they would implement its use.

RBI said the measure to prohibit Bitcoin should mitigate the ring-fencing of Indias financial system.

The 2018 proposal to prohibit Bitcoin was met with legal challenges by traders and exchanges who feared the threat to their livelihood. They filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court and Indias apex court ruled in their favor in 2020. While the ruling was considered monumental, the earlier circular was not impacted on the policy level.

People sounded off on Reddit after hearing about Indias recent push to outlaw Cryptocurrency.

One person wrote, This will disadvantage Indians trying to compete in the new global economic system. The harm could last generations. Another quipped, Best possible way to start a cryptocurrency black market.

At about the same time India was discussing limitations on Cryptocurrency in 2018, the Board of Directors for the European Central Bank (ECB) announced their displeasure with the digital currency.

Board Member Yves Mersch spoke out at the OMFIF City Lecture, cautioning that central banks should monitor Cryptocurrencys risks to price and financial stability.

Mersch said what was most concerning is, that a crash in the cryptocurrency market may cause losses of wealth large enough to affect consumer behaviour or spread contagion throughout the financial system. The dangers of individuals and retail investors losing large amounts of money are real.

The head of the Bank for International Settlements took a harder approach to Bitcoin that same year. He harshly labeled it a combination of a bubble, a Ponzi scheme and an environmental disaster.

The ECB is issuing similar warnings today, warning that Bitcoin investors should prepare themselves to lose all their money.

ECB governing council member Gabriel Makhlouf said, Personally, Im not sure why people invest in those sorts of assets, but they see them as assets clearly.

Our role is to make sure that consumers are protected, Makhlouf added. His comments mirror skepticism for other ECB leaders. ECB President Christine Lagarde said this month that cryptocurrency is considered a highly speculative asset.

Since November, the prices of Bitcoin have more than doubled, topping $40,000 in early January. In fact, large swings are quite common. Also, in the past nine days, there have been swings of more than 5 percent.

Friday saw Bitcoin rally to above $35,000. Brokers attributed the surge to SpaceX CEO and Dogecoin supporter Elon Musk mentioning it on Twitter. Still, Council Member Makhlouf says he doesnt foresee financial stability issues stemming from Bitcoin right now. He said he worries more about consumers making the right choices.

For another financial article like this, be sure to check out Robinhood Issues Statement On Trade Blocking.

Read more:
India to Prohibit Bitcoin, Other Types of Cryptocurrency - Grit Daily

Government to introduce bill to ban cryptocurrency in Budget Session – Moneycontrol.com

The government is to introduce a bill to ban, with exceptions, the trading in cryptocurrencies in India and also put in place the framework for an official digital currency to be issued by the Reserve Bank of India.

The move is likelyto end ambiguity on cryptocurrency which is neither banned nor legalised in India. The RBI had banned banks from dealing with crypto exchanges but that embargo was overturned in March 2020 by the Supreme Court of India.

The Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021 is likely to be introduced in the Budget Session of the Parliament,a Lok Sabha bulletin has said.

"The bill also seeks to prohibit all private cryptocurrencies in India. However, it allows for certain exceptions to promote the underlying technology of cryptocurrency and its uses," CNBC TV18 quoted the bill as saying.

Read |Bitcoin: Beyond the bubble

The bill, if passed, will prohibit the use of cryptocurrency as legal tender and currency. Additionally, cryptocurrency will be kept out of the payments system.

The Centre is likely to name RBI as the regulator and Enforcement Directorate as the investigating authority for offences under the cryptocurrency bill.

Read: Should you invest in cryptocurrency?

Earlier, an RBI booklet on payment systems, released on January 25, stated that the central bank is exploring whether to issue a digital version of the rupee.

"Private digital currencies (PDCs)/virtual currencies (VCs)/cryptocurrencies (CCs) have gained popularity in recent years. In India, the regulators and governments have been sceptical about these currencies and are apprehensive about the associated risks," said the booklet titled 'Payment and Settlement Systems in India'.

Also read: RBI's proposed digital currency project and what it means for you

"Nevertheless, the RBI is exploring the possibility as to whether there is a need for a digital version of fiat currency and in case there is, then how to operationalise it," it added.

Read:Heres how the cryptocurrency works

The SC ruling that overturned the RBI ban allowed crypto exchanges to restart operations in the country and dip into the booming crypto trading business in the world. Players like WazirX, Unocoin and Zebpay have recorded a massive jump in trading volumes.

The value of all cryptocurrencies earlier this yearsurpassed the $1 trillion mark and Bitcoin crossed the $40,000 mark.

Read the original here:
Government to introduce bill to ban cryptocurrency in Budget Session - Moneycontrol.com

Is The Govt’s Proposal on Ban of Private Cryptocurrency Justified? Take This Twitter Poll & Have Your Say – India.com

New Delhi: In a major development, the Modi government is planning to introduce a new law banning all private cryptocurrencies in the nation such as bitcoin and instead create a national cryptocurrency. Meanwhile, cryptocurrency entrepreneurs and industry leaders are in panic mode following the news. Also Read - Cryptocurrency Ban: India Plans to Introduce New Law Prohibiting All 'Private Cryptocurrencies'

In a Twitter poll, Rohit Chadda, CEO of Digital Publishing at Zee Group, conducted a Twitter poll asking users, whether the government move is justified. He asked in a tweet, With #IndiaWantsCrypto trending. Do you think the governments proposal on the ban of private #cryptocurrency in India is justified?

Well, the final results are yet to come, most of the users seem to be not happy with the proposed law. Do share your vote and tell us what you think!

Notably, The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill 2021 would prohibit cryptocurrencies in India and provide a framework for creating an official digital currency to be issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

The RBI had previously prohibited crypto trading for almost two years before that ban wasoverturnedby the Supreme Court in March 2020.

Read the original post:
Is The Govt's Proposal on Ban of Private Cryptocurrency Justified? Take This Twitter Poll & Have Your Say - India.com