4 Great Email Templates For Leaving Your Job – Jobbio Journal

Goodbyes are never easy. If youre leaving your current role you will undoubtedly have to go through lots of longwinded farewells.Before you send those hotly anticipated bon voyage emails you might want to read some of our templates first.Afterall, you want to leave a good lasting impression.For your clients

The first email you send should be to your clients. This email should be short and sweet.

Dear [name],

I wanted to drop you an email to let you know that I have some news. I will be leaving my position as [job title] at [company name] on [date].

I have really enjoyed working with you during my time here and I wish you all the best for the future.

If there is anything you would like me to take a look at before I leave please do not hesitate to contact me. Your new point of contact will be [colleagues name] and they will be reaching out to you shortly.

All the best,

[your name]

Its a good idea to send your supervisor or manager a personalised email. Thank them for their help and wish them well. You never know when you might need a reference.

Hi [name]

Before I finish up today I wanted to take the opportunity to drop you a quick email to say thank you.

You have been a massive support to me during my time at [company name] and I really appreciate all your help and advice over the last [period of time youve worked together].

As I move on from [company name] I would love to stay in touch. You can find my personal email address and phone number at the bottom of this email.

All the best,

[your name].

This message will go to everyone on the office email list. Make it short, to the point and polite. Try to include a few anecdotes or funny stories too. Life is too short for boring all staff emails.

Dear [nickname for coworkers]

As most of you already know today will be my last day at [company name]. Leaving this [great/wonderful] company behind has been a very difficult decision to make.

During my [number] years at [company name], I have learned a lot. From starting out as a [first position at company] to my later years in [recent position] I have grown up a lot and met some incredible people along the way.

I will be starting a new chapter at [new company name] in a few short weeks. While Im excited about this new adventure I also cant wait to see all the amazing things that you will all accomplish here at [company name].

This isnt goodbye, more of a see you later(except for you [colleague name] I never want to see you again).

My contact information is below if anyone wants to stay in touch and I will see you all for a few drinks after work.

The first round is on [colleagues name].

Best,

[your name].

This is an email that you can send to someone that you consider a friend as well as a coworker. Someone that youve spent multiple lunches with and someone you can confide in when things go wrong. Theyre your work bestie and theydeserve an email all of their own.

[Colleagues name],

As you know, I will be finishing up my time at [company name] on [date].

I just wanted to take this moment to thank you for everything that you have done for me during my time here. From your never-ending support to the millions of cups of coffee you have brought to my desk.

You made me look forward to coming into the office each morning and I will never forget the time you [anecdote].

While Im excited aboutthis new adventure, I am sad to be leaving [company name] and my amazing coworkers.

Its been a pleasure working with you and please dont be a stranger.

All the best,

[your name]

Read more:

4 Great Email Templates For Leaving Your Job - Jobbio Journal

The dangers of deplatforming

The first time I saw an Andrew Tate video (and Ill be honest), I kinda laughed. Not because my thought process was, haha women r stupid, but because I thought he was playing a character. He was so over the top, I thought it must be ironic. Over the next few months, I watched in horror as self-proclaimed sigma males fawned over every word from his mouth. We all know how this story ends: Tate got clapped off the internet. He was deplatformed and we all rejoiced.

In the aftermath, Tate lunged at the scraps of attention leftover from his moment in the spotlight. It was clear I would never see his face again, outside of some niche and postmodern meme slideshows. Yet his impact never quite faded new men picked up with misogyny right where he left off. I looked for something to blame for those months. I felt like kicking Tate off the internet meant wed solved misogyny, and then I found it.

Deplatforming can be dangerous, even when we do it to people who deserve it, like Andrew Tate. It runs three risks: it restrains potential solvency for online hate, it could be weaponized against non-agitators if they garner public chagrin, and it concentrates hateful discourse into spaces where it can fester and become worse.

Let me start by saying that deplatforming does an excellent job at getting hateful language out of spaces with high online traffic. However, it is important that we recognize that deplatforming only lowers the visibility of content we dont like and often does not do more than that. It takes one user off of at least one platform, not prevents that user from finding other ways to spread hate. Deplatforming is not an effective solution for hatred because it does not address its ideological roots, focusing instead on cleaning up a platforms political aesthetic.

Thats all a wordy way of saying that while deplatforming does make sure that we dont have to see the ugliness of hatred very often, it is not the Swiss Army knife of ending phobia despite its situational effectiveness. Deplatforming works sometimes, but the consequences are scary.

That being said, Ill try to prove myself by presenting my worst argument first. When we rush to deplatform, we focus on getting bad content out of our faces and feeds. Secondary to this, we consider what sort of impact deplatforming has on the world and whether it is an appropriate solution to what we really need to address: the ideologies that encourage aggressive rhetoric. White supremacy, patriarchal norms and a whole bunch of other buzzwords persist despite their mouthpiece being deplatformed. It may be easy to confuse deplatforming as a win against any of the aforementioned issues because we incorrectly identify agitators like Andrew Tate as the entire problem rather than a representative of a harmful ideology. Simply put, we are giving those idiots way too much credit; you can just ignore them and theyll go away.

That is the entire nature of this game all of the points that people like Andrew Tate make are not new. There has been an Andrew Tate of every single generation, making being misogynistic look cool to a whole generation of impressionable boys. Deplatforming is a solution that does not solve the problem we should be mad at but tucks harmful ideology away until someone new comes around. Therefore, when we leap to it, we stop ourselves from seeking other solutions that may better address phobia.

This feels like an appropriate time to point out that the idea of getting canceled and deplatforming is an almost uniquely American phenomenon. Theres a reason why companies such as YouTube, Twitter and Facebook dedicate most of their content screening efforts to our servers. The reason why they do that is simple: profit. They primarily filter our content because we fuss the most about things such that our outcry is unprofitable for them. The only thing that matters during this outcry is its severity, not which group is being loud. The reason I highlight this as a concern is because the right-wing niche is growing in this country, whether we like it or not. Ill keep this point short and sweet: Deplatforming can become anti-progressive very fast if political will changes.

Finally, lets take a look at the aftermath of deplatforming. Like I said at the beginning of my tirade, there is nothing more to deplatforming than just getting something you dont like out of your face. In this instance, what you dont like is hateful speech and your face is your feed. So where does this speech go when its not in your face? It finds a new face. The analogy got weird at the end, but my point is that theres always a place online that accepts hate. When its not on YouTube, its on Reddit. However, in those lower visibility spaces, the alt-right decentralizes and the things they say become more concentrated. When theres no pushback, the radicalization has no floor. In those spaces, though we cannot see it, the alt-right continues to grow. Thats why even after we get rid of Andrew Tate, people continue believing in the same things he does. Worse still, deplatforming makes it so that those same propaganda-vulnerable people are fed even more poison.

With all that being said, I still believe that deplatforming has its place. Given Ye (aka Kanye West)s recent statements, I had to reconcile with the fact that my favorite artist is morally horrible now. I think hes said enough; we can deplatform him. However, we should deplatform with the understanding that we are not solving any problems, we are just making our feeds match a political aesthetic that media companies profit from. In both Yes and Tates case, the ban was warranted, but its important that we recognize the underlying ideologies that they represent and fight those with more rigor. We should not let an itch to deplatform distract us from that.

See the rest here:

The dangers of deplatforming

WikiLeaks – What is WikiLeaks

WikiLeaks is a multi-national media organization and associated library. It was founded by its publisher Julian Assange in 2006.

WikiLeaks specializes in the analysis and publication of large datasets of censored or otherwise restricted official materials involving war, spying and corruption. It has so far published more than 10 million documents and associated analyses.

WikiLeaks is a giant library of the world's most persecuted documents. We give asylum to these documents, we analyze them, we promote them and we obtain more. - Julian Assange, Der Spiegel Interview

WikiLeaks has contractual relationships and secure communications paths to more than 100 major media organizations from around the world. This gives WikiLeaks sources negotiating power, impact and technical protections that would otherwise be difficult or impossible to achieve.

Although no organization can hope to have a perfect record forever, thus far WikiLeaks has a perfect in document authentication and resistance to all censorship attempts.

WikiLeaks, its publisher and its journalists have won many awards, including:

As well as nominations for the UN Mandela Prize (2015) and nominations in six consecutive years for the Nobel Peace Prize (2010-2015)

WikiLeaks is entirely funded by its publisher, its publication sales and the general public.

WikiLeaks has more than one hundred other staff accross the Americas, Africa, Eurasia and the Asia Pacific.

The WikiLeaks Files (Verso, Sep 2015)

WikiLeaks legal team is lead by judge Baltasar Garzn in Europe and in the United States, Michael Ratner, president emeritus of Center for Constitutional Rights.

WikiLeaks ongoing legal cases are best described in this UN report (2015) from the Center for Constitutional Rights

Julian Assange's ongoing detention without charge is best described here: https://justice4assange.com/3-Years-in-Embassy.html

This great library built from the courage and sweat of many has had a five-year confrontation with a powerpower without losing a single book. At the same time, these books have educated many, and in some cases, in a literal sense, let the innocent go free. - Julian Assange, Der Spiegel Interview

WikiLeaks is cited in more than 28 thousands academic papers and US court filings

Formal UN documents

European Court of Human Rights

UK courts

Follow our official accounts @wikileaks, @wltaskforce, @communitywl and @wikileaksshop.

Go here to see the original:

WikiLeaks - What is WikiLeaks

WikiLeaks – Government

2. Act normal

If you are a high-risk source, avoid saying anything or doing anything after submitting which might promote suspicion. In particular, you should try to stick to your normal routine and behaviour.

If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an investigation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used.

In particular, hard drives retain data after formatting which may be visible to a digital forensics team and flash media (USB sticks, memory cards and SSD drives) retain data even after a secure erasure. If you used flash media to store sensitive data, it is important to destroy the media.

If you do this and are a high-risk source you should make sure there are no traces of the clean-up, since such traces themselves may draw suspicion.

If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you. The Courage Foundation is an international organisation dedicated to the protection of journalistic sources. You can find more details at https://www.couragefound.org.

Go here to read the rest:

WikiLeaks - Government

Design Your Future in Artificial Intelligence – Kettering University

  1. Design Your Future in Artificial Intelligence  Kettering University
  2. MIT Sloan research on artificial intelligence and machine learning  MIT Sloan News
  3. Top Things to Fear about Advanced Artificial Intelligence in 2023  Analytics Insight
  4. The Value Of Artificial Intelligence Isn't Just Insights  Forbes
  5. Artificial Intelligence (AI): the coming tsunami  AEC Magazine
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Go here to see the original:
Design Your Future in Artificial Intelligence - Kettering University

README.txt by Chelsea Manning review secrets and spies

In February 2010 Chelsea Manning, a 22-year-old intelligence analyst in the US Army, sat down with a large mocha and accessed the free internet at a Barnes & Noble bookshop in Rockville, Maryland. She began to upload every incident report filed by the US military during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan close to three-quarters of a million documents in total. Manning had downloaded the files several weeks earlier, while serving in Iraq, and burned them on to a series of rewritable DVDs disguised to look like albums by Taylor Swift, Katy Perry and Lady Gaga. Then she transferred the files to the memory card in her digital camera. When she left the country, military customs did not blink.

Manning had spent months sifting vast quantities of classified information, email updates and video feeds of live conflict in Baghdad. She likens the intelligence operations centre where she worked to a trauma ward. The United States formal promise to the Iraqi government about how our troops would treat the country and its citizens didnt mean a thing, she writes. Among the files was video evidence that appeared to show the deaths of civilians during US airstrikes, as well as attempts to cover up a CIA torture programme.

The files took all day to upload, since the connection often dropped. Manning considered hurling the memory card into a bin instead. Then, half an hour before the bookstore closed, the final tranche went through. The information spread, first through the then obscure website WikiLeaks, then via national newspapers including the Guardian (for which Manning later became a columnist). To some Manning was a hero; to others a treasonous spy. After she was caught, the government began, as she puts it, a campaign to fully destroy her. She was convicted of 19 charges, including six counts of espionage, and sentenced to 35 years imprisonment almost 20 times the previous record for any American whistleblower.

As well as these critical events, README.txt also covers Mannings early life and how the army appeared to offer an escape from a traumatising upbringing. But once there she was targeted by drill sergeants for her slight, childish appearance and subjected to homophobic insults. In this turbo-charged masculine environment, her struggles with gender identity (she would later come out as trans) became more pronounced: [It was] less about being a woman trapped in a mans body than about the innate incoherence between the person I felt myself to be and the one the world wanted me to be, she writes.

In Iraq the bullying continued. After she witnessed the death of a colleague, Manning felt how with enough grief, adrenaline and fear, war can turn anyone amoral, even malevolent. She began to wrestle with two life-changing secrets: who she was, and what she saw.

At times, README.txt is vague; some sections have been blacked out, presumably on legal advice. Manning claims to have seen more than she ever disclosed, things she will never reveal. I know this is annoying, she writes. But I have already faced serious consequences for sharing information I believe to be in the public interest; I am uninterested in facing them again. Even so, what remains is a compelling, taut account of what she has experienced, and a persuasive justification of how she behaved.

At her trial, lawyers convinced Manning to issue a mea culpa: I look back at my decisions and wonder how on earth could I believe I could change the world for better over the decisions of those with the proper authority? Today, her view has changed. What I did, she concludes, was an act of forcing progress. In an age of digital communication, it is likely that todays politicians and military leaders lose far more information than is ever logged in our national archives for future study. Mannings efforts preserved a trove of evidence that one hopes will prompt corrective measures. Five years after President Obama commuted Mannings sentence, history continues to vindicate her actions.

README.txt by Chelsea Manning is published by Vintage (20). To support the Guardian and Observer, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply

Here is the original post:
README.txt by Chelsea Manning review secrets and spies

Elon Musk on Twitter Day 1 says he’ll be ‘digging in’ to shadow banning …

Check out what's clicking on FoxBusiness.com

Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter, said Thursday that he"will be digging in more today" on claims of shadow banning and follower manipulation on the social media service.

The Tesla CEO who just closed his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter on Thursday evening, taking the company private made the remark in response to a tweet on the matter.

"Ill be doing this every day to see if anything changes. As of now, Im still Shadowbanned, ghostbanned, searchbanned, and Twitter removed 1200 followers today -- as usual," a user tweeted. "Nothing has changed -- Ill report again tomorrow."

"I will be digging in more today," Musk responded.

ELON MUSK CLOSES TWITTER DEAL: WHATS NEXT?

A photo illustration with Twitter owner Elon Musk. (Getty Images/iStock / Getty Images)

Twitter denies it has been shadow banning accounts, which it describes as "deliberately making someones content undiscoverable to everyone except the person who posted it, unbeknownst to the original poster."

But prominent users such as Caitlyn Jenner have accused the social media giant of doing just that.

A sign is pictured outside the Twitter headquarters in San Francisco, on Oct. 26, 2022. (AP/Godofredo A. Vsquez / AP Images)

In April, Musk said that he believes free speech is "the bedrock of a functioning democracy" and that Twitter is "the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated."

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

The Twitter application is seen on a digital device, on April 25, 2022 in San Diego. ((AP Photo/Gregory Bull, File) / AP Newsroom)

When it comes to permanent bans on Twitter, Musk has said that he believes they should be "extremely rare" and primarily reserved for spam or fake accounts.

The billionaire has previously said he intends to reverse the permanent ban that was placed on former President Donald Trump. However, Trump told FOX Business' Stuart Varney earlier this year that he has no plans to rejoin Twitter. Instead, he said he would remain focused on his own social media platform, Truth Social.

FOX Business Lucas Manfredi contributed to this report.

View post:

Elon Musk on Twitter Day 1 says he'll be 'digging in' to shadow banning ...

Elon Musk will be ‘digging’ into shadowbans on first day at Twitter – Business Insider

  1. Elon Musk will be 'digging' into shadowbans on first day at Twitter  Business Insider
  2. Elon Musk on Twitter Day 1 says he'll be 'digging in' to shadow banning allegations  Fox Business
  3. Elon Musk says he'll be 'digging' into shadow bans on his first day at Twitter  Business Insider South Africa
  4. Musk Now Owns Twitter; What Does This Mean for Free Speech?  The Epoch Times
  5. Elon Musk Is Reportedly Already Cleaning House at TwitterAnd the Right Is Loving It  Vanity Fair
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Continued here:

Elon Musk will be 'digging' into shadowbans on first day at Twitter - Business Insider