The Evolution Of Data Science And AI At The New York Times – Forbes

Data science and machine learning are evolving in just about every single industry. The adoption of AI at companies continues to grow and evolve and AI developers are trying to prove that there is value that can be added to different parts of the company through machine learning. Not surprisingly, journalism, an industry whose primary focus is the communication of ideas in both text and visual format, has come to adopt the tools and techniques of data science to put power behind analysis and visualization of data.

The New York Times (NYT) has had a data science group since 2012, but only recently has this group moved out of the experimental phase and taken a major role in the company, adding value through machine learning. The Director of Data Science at the New York Times, Colin Russel, will be sharing some of the insights learned from the NYT data science team at an upcoming Data for AI event on November 4, 2021. Colin uses his background in predictive modeling and designing and applying machine learning algorithms to implement the Times vast quantities of data into models and visualizations that can help different segments of the company. In this article, we share some of his insights into where data science is heading at the NYT and beyond as well as insights previously shared by the NYT at the Data for AI conference in 2020.

Applications of AI

Colin Russel, New York Times

The NYT has invested in building out different machine learning teams that combine aspects of data science, data analytics, and engineering. These teams are centralized with different data science groups working with the newsroom, others with marketing, and others working with different business operations. Although each of these teams are focused on different aspects of the companys overall mission, they are all looking to build a machine learning platform that can take all of the overlapping deployment and infrastructure development and centralize it for overall use.

Traditionally, the newsroom and editorial operations are separate from the business side of the company for obvious reasons of conflict of interest and maintaining a separation between revenue-generating and news-generating activities. Because of the separation of the data journalism side and the data science side of the organization, there is a separation of culture. Due to this separation, it is often challenging working in AI for a large company and it is crucial to have a lot of clear and constant communication around the process and goals of AI implementation.

The use of data to drive decision-making and insights is spread across the entirety of the organization, however, with data analysis being used to power both business decisions as well as journalistic and editorial insights. The newsroom is very interested in data and understanding the audience of the NYT in a world where many people are getting their news from social media. Likewise, operations is interested in data-driven insights to improve advertising performance, deliver optimized content to readers, and generate more visibility of various operations and offerings.

Technology for AI

While many companies outsource their AI tools, the NYT is focused on building, not buying. Implementing AI technology is often not the hardest part a project, but rather engineering, organizing, and manipulating the data to where it can be efficiently modeled is often the challenge. Years ago, data was all over the place and as a data scientist trying to use data from different sectors of the company, you needed to get credentials for every different part. Add the difficulty obtaining data to the difficulty deciding what parts of the data are appropriate to be used for the model and this makes the actual technology for AI a smaller issue.

Due to the different areas of focus and priorities for different parts of the company, AI developers must figure out how to balance the competing concerns. The NYT recently went through an overhaul where they wanted to consolidate data on the cloud. This gave them the opportunity to start fresh and make it easy to upload data from different parts of the company.

Dealing with Variability

Data science and machine learning models are verified and evaluated to measure baseline performance as well as testing model improvements that are being developed. One of the main difficulties in taking advantage of AI is the difficulty in quantifying the goal and choosing the metric that you want to optimize. In the news and journalism industry, there is a lot of variability based on news cycles. For example, the Covid-19 pandemic has changed the company a lot as it is now giving free access to Covid-19 related news. The subscription business that wants as many subscribers as possible now has a public service component and believes having free access to information at a certain level is very important.

Certain types of recommendation algorithms respond better in different types of news cycles. Models are retrained as of protocol and the performance of a model must be taken into context with the news cycle. To evaluate the quality of a model, it must be taken over a longer period due to news cycles and environmental effects. Figuring out which models to use in each news cycle is a challenge that Colin and his team are looking to solve.

Implementing AI and ML algorithms can be a challenge in any company and determining the technology, metrics, and data to be used is very difficult. The New York Times handles these issues daily, with greater details and insights to be shared at the upcoming Data for AI event.

Here is the original post:
The Evolution Of Data Science And AI At The New York Times - Forbes

Join our MCubed web lecture this week to find out how to get machine learning into production – The Register

Special series If youve ever worked with an application that uses some form of machine learning, youll know that some component or other is always evolving. If it isnt the training data thats changing, youll surely come across a model that needs updating, and if all is well in those areas, theres a good chance a feature request is waiting for implementation so code modifications are due.

In regular software projects, we already know how to automatically take care of changes and make sure that we have a way of keeping our systems up to date without (too many) manual steps. The number of variables at play in ML however make it really tricky to come up with similar processes in that discipline, which is why it is often cited as one of the major roadblocks in getting machine-learning-based applications into production.

For the second episode of our MCubed webcast, on October 7, we therefore decided to sit down with you and have an in-depth look at how to tackle the operational side of ML. Joining in will be DevOps and data expert Danilo Sato, who helped quite a few organisations set up a comprehensible continuous delivery (CD) workflow for their machine-learning projects.

You might know Danilo from a popular article series on CD4ML, however his work reaches far beyond that. In his 2014 book DevOps in Practice: Reliable and Automated Software Delivery, he shared insights from working on all sorts of platform modernisation and data engineering projects.

On the webcast, Danilo will discuss how the principles of Continuous Delivery apply to machine-learning applications, and walk you through the technical components necessary to implement a system that takes care of CD for your ML project. Hell walk you through the differences between MLOps and CD4ML, take a closer look at the peculiarities of version control and artifact repositories in ML projects, give you some tips on what to observe, and introduce you to the many different ways a model can be deployed.

And in case you have all of this figured out already, Danilo will provide a look into the future of machine-learning infrastructure as well as give you some food for thought on open challenges such as explainability and auditability.

The MCubed webcast on October 7 will start 11am BST (noon CEST) with a roundup of the latest in machine-learning-related software development news, and then its straight on to the talk.

Dont forget to let us know if you have any topics youd like to learn more about, or if you are interested in practical experience reports from specific industries we really want to make these webcasts worth your time, so every hint helps. Also, reach out if you want to share some tricks yourself, we always love to hear from you!

Register here to get a quick reminder on the day were really looking forward to see you on Thursday.

See the rest here:
Join our MCubed web lecture this week to find out how to get machine learning into production - The Register

Why predictive modelling and machine learning can revolutionise the biopharma industry – PharmaTimes

Implementing AI in biopharma and healthcare

But the first crucial step in unlocking the power of predictive modelling and machine learning is the generation of a robust and well-maintained data backbone. No matter how each company achieves this, they must each build in a high level of interoperability, not only to facilitate the transition from siloed to streamlined data management within various company functions but more broadly to facilitate the common usage and interrogation of data within the industry. Such data federation requires the aggregation of data from a myriad of sources and the integration of this data into a common model.

Achieving this integration at an industry-wide level is challenging. The complex landscape of equipment and instruments leads to inaccessible data silos with important context and process knowledge locked away in paper records and spreadsheets. To overcome this, leading organisations are forging relationships with science and technology companies and embracing new innovations to help accelerate their digital transformation and realise the potential of AI and Biopharma 4.0.

IDBS, one of the Danaher operating companies, has recently launched the worlds first biopharma life cycle management (BPLM) platform, a new cloud-based data management platform that enables biopharma companies to more efficiently design, scale and run their processes. An embedded integration layer simplifies the curation of a process data backbone that powers data analytics and machine learning. By eliminating repetitive manual tasks, users are able to focus on developing more robust and scalable processes, supported by easily accessible data and actionable insights that accelerate process optimisation, technology transfer and regulatory filings.

Dedicated solutions are also being developed to help overcome specific challenges in the biopharma life cycle. For example, predictive modelling can be leveraged to scale up bioproduction processes, and perform fast, efficient and affordable experiments in silico. Another Danaher operating company, Cytiva, has created a digital bioreactor scaling tool, which allows users to scale bioreactor processes from bench to the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) platform and vice versa with a high degree of accuracy. The Cytiva Digital Bioreactor Scaler takes into account process parameters, along with bioreactor and cell line characteristics, and will propose options for scaling from process development to manufacturing scale.

We believe that in silico simulations will play a huge role in the future of bioprocessing. Earlier this year Cytiva acquired German scientific software manufacturer GoSilico, whose technologies create predictions to assist in the development of downstream chromatography purification processes. Process development is an intense and time-consuming part of making any therapy. By using the Cytiva Digital Bioreactor Scaler and mechanistic models to test different options for upstream and downstream processes, drug developers can expect to predictably manage resources, time and risk, and help in process understanding across the organisation. This sort of digital innovation will provide transformational capabilities for our industry, at a time when speed to market is more important than ever.

Embracing disruption

Broader applications of these groundbreaking technologies are going to radically disrupt the industry, all the way from the laboratory bench to point of care. The amount and complexity of health data at point of care is growing at an exponential rate, with increasing adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), wearable health apps and trackers that collect long-term personalised data, and services such as direct-to-consumer genetic testing that can be integrated into social networks. Meanwhile, machine learning is already being applied to quickly and accurately analyse hundreds of radiological images, enabling precise decisions as reliable as those made by trained and experienced physicians.

As digitalisation becomes increasingly fundamental to healthcare, it is imperative that the biopharma industry also does everything it can to embrace these disruptive technologies so we can all move towards a more personalised and precise approach to medicine. R&D experiments performed in silico are providing new insights into health and disease biology, revealing novel treatment targets, and providing new ways to precisely hit those targets. These digital experiments can also analyse huge data sets to identify novel biomarkers for delivering personalised therapy: ensuring that the right patient is treated with the right drug at the right time.

Building on federated data in robust data backbones, predictive modelling with machine learning is what will move our industry away from the inefficient empirical approach currently used in drug discovery and process development. Instead of carrying out hundreds of time-consuming, costly and inefficient wet bench experiments to identify what succeeds, we will first experiment in silico by using highly trained machine learning-based models to quickly and accurately predict the outcomes.

Positive outcomes will then be tested in a few select experiments, which will also test the validity and utility of the digital models. Validated models and experimental data will then inform decision-making.

Through predictive modelling and beyond, using machine learning and other forms of AI and data science, we will be able to push the boundaries of what can be achieved by the biopharma industry. It will require investment, innovation and a mindset shift, but will enable us to deliver better medicines, faster, more accessibly, and with greater personalisation towards patients.

Kevin Chance is vice president of Danaher Corporation

Here is the original post:
Why predictive modelling and machine learning can revolutionise the biopharma industry - PharmaTimes

Kennesaw State professor awarded NSF grant to teach students detection of cybersecurity attacks – Kennesaw State University

Hossain Shahriar

KENNESAW, Ga. (Oct 11, 2021) Kennesaw State University information technology professor Hossain Shahriar, along with colleagues Dan Lo and Michael Whitman, has been awarded a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant to develop hands-on, interactive materials for students to recognize cybersecurity threats.

Shahriar and his team will use the nearly $280,000 grant from the NSF Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace Program to create 10 modules to solve common cybersecurity problems using machine learning algorithms. Whitman is executive director of the Institute of Cybersecurity Workforce Development and a professor of information security and assurance and Lo is a professor of computer science.

Machine learning technologies are being used by large companies like Apple and Google to protect our personal data, detect and filter spam emails, identify phishing websites and detect malware, said Shahriar, aprofessor in theCollege of Computing and Software Engineering.

Shahriar wants students to learn about this technology early in their degree program so they develop marketable skillsets for future employers.

We want to ensure students have more confidence tackling these cyber challenges,saidShahriar.We start with the basics. For example, students should be comfortable detecting whether an email theygetis spam or a normal email by using machine learning techniques.

Shahriar, who teachesseveral courses at KSU includingoneon ethical hacking and network security,said cybersecurity threats are constantly evolvingbecausehackers also use machine learning techniques to generate new malware.In addition to research done at KSU, Shahriar will partner with faculty at Tuskegee University in Alabama to introduce materials into their curriculums.

"Thats very significant for this project because our goals include increasing the cybersecurity knowledge base and workforce around the country and increasing participation from underrepresented, minority students, he said. Tuskegee University is a prominent historically Black university, and we are excited about this collaboration.

The research team, which includes undergraduate and graduate students at KSU,plansto spendayear building online modules andthenpiloting them in the classroom. Once that is complete,Shahriarhopes to disseminate those modules to professors around the Southeast to use in theirundergraduate and graduate curriculums.KSU'sBurruss Institute of Public Service and Researchand Hillary Steiner, Associate Director for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, will also have a role in evaluating the project outcomes.

Ascybersecuritythreats and hackers evolve,Shahriarsaid its more important than ever for students to have the skills to detect them.

Abbey OBrien Barrows

A leader in innovative teaching and learning, Kennesaw State University offers undergraduate, graduate and doctoral degrees to its nearly 43,000 students. With 11 colleges on two metro Atlanta campuses, Kennesaw State is a member of the University System of Georgia. The universitys vibrant campus culture, diverse population, strong global ties and entrepreneurial spirit draw students from throughout the country and the world. Kennesaw State is a Carnegie-designated doctoral research institution (R2), placing it among an elite group of only 6 percent of U.S. colleges and universities with an R1 or R2 status. For more information, visit kennesaw.edu.

More:
Kennesaw State professor awarded NSF grant to teach students detection of cybersecurity attacks - Kennesaw State University

Canada invited Chelsea Manning to country just so she could be thrown out – The Guardian

Canadian government lawyers recently invited US whistleblower Chelsea Manning to travel to a hearing in Montreal so that border agents could then physically remove her from the country.

The bizarre request, which was eventually denied by an adjudicator, was made ahead of an immigration hearing set to begin on Thursday for Manning, whose previous attempts to enter Canada have been denied.

Manning, a former US intelligence analyst who leaked thousands of sensitive government documents and diplomatic cables about the American wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to WikiLeaks, was sentenced to 35 years in prison in 2013.

Her sentence was commuted in 2017, but she was recently denied entry into Canada because of her conviction.

Border officials can deem persons ineligible for entry into Canada if they have been convicted of crimes abroad that would have led to a jail sentence in Canada of 10 years or more.

Last week, lawyers for the government asked that she travel to the country so that if the government won its case, she could be removed. Mannings lawyers had said she would attend the hearing virtually, from her home in the United States.

The purpose of a removal order is to compel an individual who is found to be inadmissible to leave Canada. Should the [Immigration Review Board] issue a removal order against an individual who does not attend their hearing from a location in Canada, the government told the IRB in documents obtained by the National Post, arguing it would be impractical for CBSA to enforce the order.

But that line of reasoning made little sense to the IRB adjudicator Marisa Musto, who dismissed the governments motion on Monday.

If she were physically in Canada when the order was made, the requirement would be that she leave Canada. Given that she is already outside Canada, a fact which is not in question, it can be said that the objective of [immigration laws] would, de facto, be fulfilled, Musto said in her ruling, calling the governments request confounding.

Mannings lawyers have fiercely contested the ban on her entering Canada, arguing that an attempt by the countrys federal government to block one of the most well-known whistleblowers in modern history from entering the country would offend constitutional and press freedoms.

The hearing is expected to last two days, with a judgment issued in the coming weeks.

Link:
Canada invited Chelsea Manning to country just so she could be thrown out - The Guardian

Ottawa wanted U.S. whistleblower Chelsea Manning to come to Canada so she could be kicked out in person – National Post

Breadcrumb Trail Links

The IRB adjudicator dismissed the governments motion, saying the intent of Parliament was simply for people who aren't allowed to be in Canada to not be here

Author of the article:

Publishing date:

The government of Canada asked U.S. whistleblower Chelsea Manning to travel to Canada so border agents would be able to physically kick her out of Canada.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

The odd request was made by government lawyers last week in anticipation of an immigration hearing scheduled to begin Thursday for the former U.S. soldier who leaked thousands of U.S. documents that changed the publics view of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The hearing on whether Manning is eligible to visit Canada is to be held by video conference.

Lawyers on behalf of the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness asked the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) to postpone the hearing until Manning is in Canada for it, rather than participating over a video link from her home in the United States.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

The government said that if she wasnt physically in the country, Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) wouldnt be able to remove her, if the government wins its case.

The purpose of a removal order is to compel an individual who is found to be inadmissible to leave Canada. Should the (IRB) issue a removal order against an individual who does not attend their hearing from a location in Canada, the government told the IRB in written argument, it would be impractical for CBSA to enforce the order.

Mannings lawyers objected to the request.

In a decision Monday, IRB adjudicator Marisa Musto dismissed the governments motion, saying the intent of Parliament was simply for people who arent allowed to be in Canada to not be here.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

If Manning is found to be inadmissible after the hearing, the impact on Manning would be the same wherever in the world she was, Musto said.

If she were physically in Canada when the order was made, the requirement would be that she leave Canada. Given that she is already outside Canada, a fact which is not in question, it can be said that the objective of (immigration laws) would, de facto, be fulfilled, Musto said in her ruling.

Admissibility proceedings not only have the effect of removing inadmissible persons from Canadian territory but also to preclude them from entering.

Musto said there had already been plenty of admissibility hearings for people outside of Canada that the government did not object to.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

This inconsistency in the Ministers position is confounding.

Manning, a 33-year-old American citizen, was a military intelligence analyst deployed to Iraq in 2009 who became one of the best-known American whistleblowers after leaking a vast trove of documents through Wikileaks to major news organizations around the world.

The documents revealed undeclared civilian deaths, complicity in torture, significant human rights abuses and evidence contradicting the U.S. governments public versions of its wartime actions.

Manning was arrested and convicted under the U.S. Espionage Act and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and sentenced to 35 years in prison, the longest sentence ever issued in the United States for leaking.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

In 2017, after seven years in prison, Mannings sentence was commuted by U.S. President Barack Obama.

Soon after her release, Manning tried to come to Canada but was stopped at the border. She was considered inadmissible by CBSA because she has been convicted of a serious criminal offence outside Canada.

A hearing on her admissibility is scheduled for two days, but a decision is not expected to be released immediately afterwards. Written submissions are expected from both Manning and the government following oral arguments.

On Sept. 17, Manning said she tested positive for COVID-19 despite being fully vaccinated.

I will be quarantined for the remainder of the month my symptoms are very mild thanks to being fully vaxxed in April, she said on Twitter.

On Oct. 1, Manning tweeted: off quarantine and feeling good.

Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | Twitter: AD_Humphreys

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notificationsyou will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Read this article:
Ottawa wanted U.S. whistleblower Chelsea Manning to come to Canada so she could be kicked out in person - National Post

Julian Assange and the CIA-USA Daily Wars Against Humanity – LA Progressive

The weekend of October 23-25, in anticipation of a UK court convening to re-consider a previous lower court decision to refuse Julian Assanges extradition to the U.S., Assange supporters will be mobilizing across the U.S. and worldwide demanding:Free Julian Assange! Drop the Charges! No to Extradition! Free Speech! Free Press! Free Journalists! No to Endless U.S. Wars! Seeassangedefense.orgfor details.

Of the estimated 1.4 million top security clearance U.S. personnel employed by one or another of the governments 18 braches of its $81 billion annually budgeted U.S. Intelligence Community, perhaps one or two individuals each year are designated as whistleblowers and persecuted to the high heavens. These include heroes like Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning today and Daniel Ellsberg, the renowned Vietnam-era Pentagon Papers defendant of yesteryear, whose revelations educated millions about the U.S. horrors committed against the Vietnamese people. Four million Vietnamese were murdered in this ten-year genocide, begun with the CIAs lie that a U.S. destroyer was attacked in Vietnams Tonkin Bay by the equivalent of a Vietnamese sampan or small fishing boat.

Another handful of heroes, likeWikiLeaksfounder and journalist/publisher Julian Assange, are similarly persecuted when they exercise their right to publish what the whistleblowers have revealed about U.S. war crimes around the world. In addition to the 1.4 million top secret U.S. government spies, another 4.25 million Intelligence Community employees have some type of special clearance but dont necessarily work in secure and undisclosed locations. Thats a total approaching some six million people in the U.S. spy business, not to mention the tiny proportion in the business of directly ordering and planning assassinations, kidnappings, death squad wars, covert and overt wars, drone wars, regime change military coups, cyber wars, media disinformation wars, industrial spying wars and all the rest.

Jim Laffertys October 5Los Angeles Progressivearticle entitled, With Military Actions in 159 Countries, America is Now the Worlds Police Force, adds yet another dimension to the U.S. national and international war crimes horrors. (Seesocialistaction.org). Lafferty is the recently retired 30+ year Los Angeles director of the National Lawyers Guild, a present board member of the LA area ACLU and a founder/steering committee member ofAssangedefense.org.

The recent article byYahoo Newsjournalists,Zach Dorfman,Sean D. NaylorandMichael Isikoffentitled, Kidnapping, Assassination and a London Shoot-Out: Inside the CIAs Secret War Plans AgainstWikiLeaks similarly reveals the deadly deeds routinely practiced in the U.S. spy system. (See:Inside the CIAs secret war plans against WikiLeaks)

The governments six million usually well-paid spies, along with its annual $1 trillion war budget including the CIAs estimated secret, or non-reported expenditures and its admitted cyber surveillance of literally everyone in the U.S. as Edward Snowden definitively revealed are justified in the name of defending U.S. national security interests. Citing the sanctity of these interests U.S. courts imprison with impunity and as a warning to all no matter how monstrous the governments crimes all truthtellers. In the case of Julian Assange CIA spies and government officials contemplated assassination but settled for bringing charges that would incarcerate him for 175 years.

U.S. courts imprison with impunity and as a warning to all no matter how monstrous the governments crimes all truthtellers.

Whistleblowers like Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning and Daniel Ellsberg are a rare breed indeed. They are among a precious few who appear, perhaps once in every generation, to reveal in microcosm, the abject horror of the daily functioning of the U.S. national security state. President Obama broke all records in prosecuting whistleblowers but their numbers were still limited to a handful. Fear takes a terrible toll in a society that aims at instilling conformity and obedience. Constituted to defend and advance U.S. imperialisms interests in all its national and international manifestations, the state power rarely recognizes any right to dissent to expose its war crimes, unless, that is, the dissent is backed by millions in the streets who increasingly understand that the U.S. government does not represent their interests and who set out to seriously explore political alternatives to the two-party system of rule. The ruling elite fear nothing more than organized mass movements that fight for the interests of the vast majority and are led by deeply-rooted conscious working class fighters intent on challenging the system itself.

Julian Assange, according to theYahoo Newsexpos, had been on the radar of U.S. intelligence agencies for years, but their plans for an all-out war against him were sparked byWikiLeaksongoingpublicationof extraordinarily sensitive CIA hacking tools, known collectively as Vault 7, which the agencyultimately concludedrepresented the largest data loss in CIA history.

Hacking tools refers to the CIAs capacity to use cyber war against any perceived enemy anywhere in the world. Indeed, as Edward Snowden revealed, the tools were used against enemies and allies alike, including surveillance in place against the entire U.S. population as well as heads of state like Germanys former Chancellor Angela Merkel.

The CIAs spying onWikiLeaks,according toYahoo News,aimed at sowing discord among the groups members, and stealing their electronic devices. Then President Trumps CIA Director, Mike Pompeo in 2017 had designatedWikiLeaksa non-state hostile intelligence service.

Yahoo Newsinvestigations were based on conversations with more than 30 former U.S. officials eight of whom described details of the CIAs proposals to abduct Assange. The CIAs campaign spearheaded by Pompeo bent important legal strictures, potentially jeopardize[ing] the Justice Departments work toward prosecuting Assange, and risk[ing] a damaging episode in the United Kingdom, the United States closest ally. TheYahooreporters did not generally reveal the names of their sources and took pains to add codicils that many of the internal CIA discussions were mere proposals to be considered rather than implemented.

Assanges revelations of U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq, including some 250,000 U.S. diplomatic cables from U.S. embassies around the world, were particularly vexing to U.S. imperialisms hierarchy while winning wide acclaim from social justice and antiwar activists everywhere who aimed to contest the right of the U.S. imperialist behemoth to wage war against poor and oppressed people and nations.

Yahoo Newsreported that The CIA now considered people affiliated with WikiLeaks valid targets for various types of spying, including close-in technical collection such as bugs sometimes enabled by in-person espionage, and remote operations, meaning, among other things, the hacking of WikiLeaks members devices from afar.

WikiLeaks walks like a hostile intelligence service and talks like a hostile intelligence service and has encouraged its followers to find jobs at the CIA in order to obtain intelligence, said Director Pompeo. Imagine that! A news agency infiltrating the CIA! In truth, isnt it the other way around? The record demonstrates that CIA operatives, as a matter of course, regularly provide stories and/or other material to the nations corporate media to promote the governments views. That was no doubt the case with regard to the 2003 Iraq War, when Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was charged in headline news reports across the U.S. with possessing weapons of mass destruction nuclear, biological and chemical weapons intended for use against the U.S. None were ever found! Years later in the run up to the 2020 elections candidate Joe Biden stated that his vote for war against Iraq was a mistake. Said Biden,I didnt believe [Hussein] had those nuclear weapons. I didnt believe he had weapons of mass destruction.

Yet Iraq was bombed to smithereens via an essentially bi-partisan vote; 1.5 million Iraqis were murdered and cities leveled withrealU.S. weapons of mass destruction and subsequently from deadly sanctions. Indeed, in most every instance when a major media outlet receives classified material from a rare whistleblower, they invariably submit this material to the government for pre-publication editing, if it is published at all.

Pompeos designation non-state hostile intelligence service allowed the CIAs work to proceed againstWikiLeaksfrom a target ofcollectionto a target ofdisruption according to theYahoo Newsreporters sources. [Emphasis added]. One might ask, operating on the nave presumption that we live in a free society with a free press with journalists free to pursue the truth about government functioning, whyanymedia,WikiLeaksincluded, should ever be anytarget.

In the case ofWikiLeaks,the core offensive counterintelligence actions considered against it included paralyzing its digital infrastructure, disrupting its communications, provoking internal disputes within the organization by planting damaging information, and stealingWikiLeaksmembers electronic devices.

Yahoo Newsadded: Agency executives requested and received sketches of plans for killing Assange and other Europe-based WikiLeaks members who had access to Vault 7 materials, said a former intelligence official. There were discussions on whether killing Assange was possible and whether it was legal, a former official said.

Yahoo Newsasked Trump directly if his government had contemplated assassinating Assange. Needless to say, Trump emphatically said No. Presidents are not in the business of publicly admitting to government atrocities! Indeed, sinceWikiLeakswas central to revealing the Democratic Partys internal emails exposing how the Hillary Clinton team manipulated the partys finances to promote her presidential campaign against Bernie Sanders, Trump is assessed by theYahoo Newsreporters as perhaps having a favorable attitude toWikiLeaks.Honor among thieves is indeed a rarity in capitalist politics.

Time and space do not allow a thorough accounting of the governments voluminous efforts, actual or contemplated, to punish Assange andWikiLeaksfor revealing the truth about the governmentsmodus operandi in the U.S. and around the world.

In truth, however, the governments assault onWikiLeaksnotwithstanding, we increasingly live in a Truman Show [Jim Carrey movie. Editor] or Potemkin Village world an Orwellian-like society saturated every minute by a kept corporate media in all its manifestations that manufactures and perpetuates the myth of an egalitarian democracy where the people rule and truth is forever prized. Tragically, the truth lies elsewhere. The U.S. is ruled by an elite few billionaires and their corporate entities whose twin parties periodically spend countless $billions in rigged elections between themselves, from which working people are excluded.

The U.S. war machine rains death and destruction everywhere its economic and political interests are challenged. Its corporate media monopoly operates to burnish or prettify and deflect capitalisms horrors, or to ignore or justify them outright.

Capitalisms endless wars are inseparable from its fossil fuel-induced climate catastrophes and its inherent racism, sexism and LGBTQI discrimination; all exist and are promoted to divide its natural working class opponents, who have zero interest in aligning with their oppressors.

Julian Assange andWikiLeaksare among the precious and special few who have exposed in incredible detail the daily operations of the imperialist war machine and its major corporate party players. That the U.S. today seeks his extradition from the UK to stand trial on spurious charges under the reactionary witch hunting wartime Espionage Act of 1917* is a legal and political atrocity. Assanges defense and freedom today must stand before us as a priority issue.

*The Espionage Act of 1917prohibited obtaining information, recording pictures, or copying descriptions of any informationrelating to the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information may be used for the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation.

Jeff Mackler

Go here to see the original:
Julian Assange and the CIA-USA Daily Wars Against Humanity - LA Progressive

Chain reaction: Corey Johnson finally talks with East River Park activists – The Village Sun

BY LINCOLN ANDERSON | Updated Oct. 8, 1 p.m.: Council Speaker Corey Johnson on Thursday finally spoke with East River Park activists who have been staging a weeklong protest outside City Hall. He talked with them for about 25 minutes, though claimed that he was not aware that they and allegedly two key councilmembers have been urging him to hold an emergency oversight hearing on the citys coastal-resiliency plan that would destroy the current 60-acre park.

Later on, after Johnson left, Chelsea Manning, the U.S. Army whistleblower and trans activist, dropped by to show support for the protesters and pose for photos with them, hanging out with them for about an hour.

Johnson spoke with three activists, Sarah Wellington, Eileen Myles and Sandy Charles. Tommy Loeb captured it on video.

First of all, Johnson said, the three councilmembers whose districts include or are near the park Carlina Rivera, Keith Powers and Margaret Chin must all agreed to hold the emergency hearing. He said this concept of member deference has been the norm in the City Council for the past 35 years, including under the previous four speakers.

Carlina wont respond to us on any level, one of the activists told him.

The activists say that Justin Brannan and James Gennaro, who respectively chair the Committee on Resiliency and Waterfronts and the Committee on Environmental Protection, have told them that they have told Johnson they want the hearing but Johnson said that wasnt the case.

My understanding is that no hearing has been requested, Johnson stated. He said there would need to be an official request for a hearing, then followed by a conversation within the body.

At a couple of points during the talk, Johnson, who wore a black face mask, took a few steps back and warned that he had to get a COVID test.

Charles, who lives in the Vladeck Houses, a Lower East Side public-housing development, broke into tears as she told the Council speaker how important the park has been to her, both physically and mentally, how she was able to drop from 210 pounds by being able to exercise there.

Tears streaming down her cheeks, she told him, You have [an alternate] way. There is a way to put the wall up by the F.D.R. and keep the water in the park.

At the end of the exchange, the activists pushed Johnson for a follow-up meeting.

Im very glad we had this conversation, he said. I will talk to some folks [in the City Council] and try to get some information.

Meanwhile, Wellington said the activists have to get things sorted out, too mainly by checking to see if Brannan and Gennaro really did ask Johnson to hold the hearing. Brannan has notably not responded to the protesters requests to stand with them in City Hall Park.

So whos lying? she asked.

City Hall Park has looked like a Houdini Con / outdoor dungeon albeit with bullhorns and festive trumpets this week as East River Park activists have been again chaining themselves to trees to protest the mayors contentious coastal-resiliency plan.

The previous week, two environmentalists, J.K. Canepa and jmac, locked themselves together in an embrace around one of the parks trees for 12 hours, demanding that someone from Johnsons office communicate with them about the East Side Coastal Resiliency plan.

East River Park activists have been calling for the City Council speaker to O.K. an emergency oversight hearing on the scheme, which would bury the existing 60-acre park under tons of landfill to raise it 8 feet to 10 feet above the floodplain and prevent another Sandy from swamping the East Village and Lower East Side. The activists endorse a much lower-impact plan that would not raise the park but just build earth berms along the east side of the F.D.R. Drive and add seawalls in other spots.

Meanwhile, work on the East River Park section of the citys E.S.C.R. megaproject (which spans from Montgomery Street to 23rd Street), slated at a whopping $1.3 billion, is set to start imminently, word has it sometime in the next two months, explaining the activists constant presence outside City Hall this past week. Under the plan, East River Parks nearly 1,000 mature trees with a tree canopy that was 80 years in the making would be clear-cut.

After Canepa and jmac unlocked themselves last Tuesday, Canepa warned that, unless Johnson or one of his staffers agreed to at least talk to them, they had better get used to the sight of environmentalists chained to trees outside of City Hall.

No one from Johnsons office had reached out to them. So the activists made good on their threat, protesting in the park every day this week, starting Monday.

Similarly, a Johnson spokesperson has ducked responding when asked by The Village Sun if the speaker would green-light the emergency hearing. The paper first asked the question back in August and asked again last week. But Johnson has not commented on the issue.

The City Hall Park protest will continue through this Friday, from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., and the demonstrators are urging park activists to come join them. They are staging their actions just inside the park at Broadway and Warren Streets.

Wellington, one of the organizers, said the park activists have forged solidarity with a group of yellow taxi medallion owners who have been protesting outside City Hall for three weeks, 24 hours day, demanding debt relief. The two groups sometimes protest together.

Weve been saying, Save our cabbies! Save our parks!' she said. Theyre essential workers being left behind by de Blasio. Theres an epidemic of suicides among cabbies.

The background din in the video with Johnson is from the cab medallion owners protest.

As for East River Park, the idea of closing it off to the public even if the project, as planned, were done in two phases to keep part of it open is crazy, she said.

Where does de Blasio expect all these New Yorkers to go? she asked. They keep taking away public space.

Speaking Friday afternoon, Wellington said the activists, while chained up to the trees, are also now strategizing on how they will lie down in bulldozers if they show up to destroy East River Parks trees.

She said it was fitting that whistleblower Manning came by to show solidarity with them since the East River Park fight is all about transparency. A Value Engineering Report for the park was hidden from the public for a year and a half until the activists forced its release.

See original here:
Chain reaction: Corey Johnson finally talks with East River Park activists - The Village Sun

Bitcoin rises to the highest since May, is now up 30% in October – CNBC

Bitcoin extended its two-week rally Monday, climbing to the highest level since early May, according to Coin Metrics.

The cryptocurrency last traded more than 3% higher at $57,530.81 after hitting as high as $57,740.82.

The comeback a gain of another 12% would take it back to its all-time high of about $65,000 comes amid increasing hopes and expectations that a bitcoin futures ETF could be approved soon. That, along with recent comments from the heads of the Federal Reserve and Securities and Exchange Commission, who said they have no intention of banning bitcoin, seemed to "embolden" investors, Ned Davis Research noted.

Ben McMillan, chief investment officer at the quantitativeindex fund manager IDX, attributed the jump to increasing concerns about inflation being more than transitory as well as trading data that looks increasingly positive for the bitcoin price.

"We're looking at food prices that are at a 10-year peak, oil topping $80 for the first time in five or six years, and that's really hitting consumers in the pocketbook," he said. "A lot of investors are starting to look back to the original appeal of bitcoin as a store of value, as something that can't be weighed by any central bank."

Trading data shows the price action continues to be driven by institutional investors, McMillan added, particularly the size of the transactions and the number of large ones.

NDR's Pat Tschosik noted bitcoin and gold's one-year correlation has been dropping to the point where it's about to turn negative, meaning that the prices of the two are no longer moving in tandem.

"Bitcoin could be seen as the preferred inflation hedge if the dollar and real rates are rising," he told CNBC.

The cryptocurrency is now up nearly 30% for the month and 95% for the year. Many are expecting this rally to be the door to the next all-time high, though Ned Davis notes bitcoin tends to have a correction every 40 days, on average.

The latest run-up "follows a breakout above resistance from early September, which targeted the all-time high, so we would view any resulting consolidation as temporary," said Katie Stockton of Fairlead Strategies. "For those who are looking to add exposure, the implications would be to wait a couple weeks, noting that there is room to initial support defined by the cloud model, currently near [$47,000 to $48,000]."

Excerpt from:
Bitcoin rises to the highest since May, is now up 30% in October - CNBC

Bitcoin jumps to nearly 5-month high, topping $55,000 on Wednesday – CNBC

Bitcoin jumped to a nearly five-month high above $55,000 on Wednesday, extending its rally from the previous day as institutions jumped in to try to catch the wave.

The cryptocurrency traded 7.6% higher at $54,873.02, according to Coin Metrics. Ether also rose 2.8% to $3,575.73.

Bitcoin rose as high as $55,499 earlier in the session. It's up 13% this week alone and 87% for the year.

The rally comes amid a series of small developments in Washington, D.C. that have provided some comfort to institutional investors keen to jump into cryptocurrencies.

"Regulatory uncertainty is what's still keeping investors out of the market and every time we get a step closer to regulatory clarity, you see this kind of reaction," Bitwise Asset Management chief investment officer Matt Hougan said. "It's the primary driver of next great bull market in crypto."

According to financial advisors surveyed by Bitwise, the number one thing preventing them from making allocations to crypto is regulatory uncertainty. Hougan said the majority result has been the same three years in a row.

On Tuesday, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler said in a hearing of the House Financial Services Committee that he has no plans to ban cryptocurrency, and that a ban would be up to Congress.

Gensler's comments mirror those made by Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who also said Friday he has no plans to ban cryptocurrencies.

"You had every major regulatory agency in the U.S. this summer declaring that they needed to create a new regulatory regime around crypto," Hougan added. "That created a great deal of uncertainty in investors minds, they were hesitant to allocate not knowing what the range of possibilities would be. The reason we're rallying this week is that most extreme left tail of following the path of China was wiped from the market by both Jerome Powell and Gary Gensler."

Genesis head of market insights Noelle Acheson said Wednesday's price action is different from previous ones this year and that all signs point to it being institutionally driven.

"Institutional investors move as a herd, they are momentum chasers," she said. "When they see this kind of momentum, they start to think, what am I going to miss? Is my performance going to be weaker than those of my competitors? Maybe I should pile into that."

She noted that Bitcoin has maintained its rank in the top five performing digital assets over the past 24 hours. That's something Acheson had never ever seen before, as top performers are usually smaller altcoins and DeFi assets. Bitcoin is the institutional onramp to crypto, and when it's one of the top performers, it's a sign the institutions are coming, Acheson said.

She added that with a sharp price jump, there tend to be several short positions that get liquidated, but that wasn't the case Wednesday.

"At one stage that price jumped 3.5% in a five-minute window, and without the liquidations, that says that that is big spot buying," Acheson said.

Another big signal came from the CME.

On Wednesday, it had the highest basis spread the difference between bitcoin futures prices and the spot price of any of the exchanges, Acheson said. She called it "unusual" because the CME basis normally trails that of the other exchanges. She added that CME is the exchange that offers the lowest leverage, so while it may not be the one used by traders or hedge funds that want leverage, it's the one traditional institutions often choose to use because it's currently the only crypto derivatives exchange with federal oversight.

At the same time, stocks were falling as concerns about rising rates, higher inflation, the state of the reopening and the debt limit dented investor sentiment. Bitcoin hasn't proven itself to be a safe-haven asset its price has tanked with the stock market several times before but many still see it that way and it was holding up amid Wednesday's equity market turmoil.

"The Janet Yellen discussion yesterday was a major reason to buy bitcoin," CNBC's Jim Cramer said Wednesday morning on "Squawk on the Street." "If you parse what she's saying and it becomes true, the dollar doesn't seem to be as valuable as crypto."

Yellen warned on Tuesday that inflationary pressures hitting the U.S. economy could last for several months and that the U.S. should fully expect a recession if the debt limit isn't lifted within two weeks.

"Thus far we've seen cryptos behave as a hybrid somewhere between a commodity and a currency," Morgan Stanley Wealth Management chief investment officer Lisa Shalett told "Squawk on the Street." So the "volatility has been 4x that of stocks."

Link:
Bitcoin jumps to nearly 5-month high, topping $55,000 on Wednesday - CNBC