Artificial Intelligence In The Warehouse Is Coming Sooner Than You Might Think – Logistics Viewpoints – Logistics Viewpoints

Artificial Intelligence is not a new technology, but widespread adoption and use of AI and machine learning in supply chain is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, there are indications that AI in the warehouse is becoming a reality a lot sooner than most people might have expected.

Preliminary results from a Lucas-commissioned survey of 350 companies in the US and UK found that the majority of the companies are already employing AI in one way or another within their warehouses and distribution/fulfillment centers. A separate survey of retail and CPG supply chain leaders found that AI usage is more prevalent in DCs and warehouses than elsewhere in supply chain 54% in distribution/fulfillment centers vs. 36% in other supply chain functions. On the surface, thats a bit of a surprise. But not when you dig a little deeper.

First, a word about the terms artificial intelligence and machine learning, as I am using them here. There are many forms of AI, but for purposes of this article Im referring to systems that use machine learning approaches to solve specific problems. Machine learning is a process by which learning algorithms are applied to large sets of data to create predictive models. This type of AI can be embedded within robotics (to identify objects), automation (to predict failures), and software systems, including business applications that provide recommendations to managers (suggested product moves) or that initiate actions themselves (such as creating a daily staffing plan).

Now, why is this form of advanced AI emerging so quickly in the DC?

It turns out that the distribution center is a target rich environment for using AI, with the potential to drive significant operational gains. First, DCs are a controlled environment for collecting and aggregating historical and real-time data and data is a key to effective AI. By contrast, other supply chain optimization problems often require data that resides in disparate systems, some of which may be controlled by other entities or may not be accessible in real-time.

Furthermore, AI is a natural fit for many of the foundational warehouse management questions that most operators solve today using spreadsheets, inherited best practices, or rules-based decision making. For example, only a minority of DCs today have installed systems for product slotting, workforce planning and other core warehouse functions. The reason is simple: previous expert systems to address these optimization challenges are engineering-heavy and costly to install and maintain.

AI and machine learning-based solutions can eliminate some of those drawbacks. As a result, AI has the potential to make advanced optimization practical for smaller operations, and more flexible and cost-effective for larger facilities.

One of the things that makes machine learning so compelling is that the predictive models are not developed or maintained by teams of engineers, so they are easier to implement. In addition, by their very nature, machine learning systems are designed to adapt to changes in the operating environment. And AI is particularly good at solving complex problems that are difficult to solve with traditional expert systems.

Here are two examples.

Warehouse slotting is both a combinatorial optimization problem (many input factors to consider) and a multiple objective optimization problem (with many goals, sometimes competing). Adding to the challenge, there are typically thousands of products and product locations (slots) involved, and those products and/or locations may change, sometimes frequently.

This is a complex problem with a very large set of possible answers that is very difficult to solve with a general-purpose model. Thats one reason why typical slotting solutions require tremendous amounts of engineering time for each facility. This is the kind of problem that AI is really good at.

AI-based slotting can provide better results and it can lower implementation costs by eliminating much of the engineering work and manual warehouse mapping and data inputs. The AI-based software can learn the spatial characteristics and travel time predictions required for the model based on activity-level data captured in the DC.

Another application of AI is for orchestrating and optimizing warehouse workers and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs). Today, robotic and manual processes can be optimized using various forms of AI, but they are typically optimized independently. Orchestrating and optimizing robot-human workflows is a wholly different challenge.

To take one example, consider an order-picking process using AMRs as a type of picking cart with multiple order totes per AMR, where human pickers are subservient to the AMRs. As the robotic system directs the robot to a location, a nearby user deliversone or more picksto the robot based on instructions on a tablet mounted to the machine. After completing those picks, the picker finds the next closest robot, and the first robot moves off to its next destination where it meets a second worker. This approach does not require any means to independently direct the human workers, but it also doesnt optimize their work.

Using AI and adding a means to direct workers independent of the AMRs (using mobile devices rather than AMR-mounted devices) the system can orchestrateand optimize for both the robots and the pickers time.This is accomplished in part using machine learning-based predictions about where the robots and pickers will be located at a given point in time (adjusted in real-time based on actual location data). Separate learning algorithms can organize and sequence the work among people and robots which orders to group together on each AMR, when to direct a person to a new aisle, etc. This is a more complex problem than independently optimizing the work of people or the AMRs.

As noted above, machine learning requires large amounts of data, but you need the right data for the questions you want to answer. For the DC applications we discussed here, some of the data would not be found in enterprise software systems that capture general transaction data, such as an ERP or WMS.

Instead, machine learning relies on streams of fine-grained data that is often associated with IoT (the Internet of Things) devices, such as mobile robots or the mobile devices used in RF or voice picking applications that collect time-stamped data about every user interaction. In the past, some of this data may have been used for short term purposes (debugging, training, etc.), but it was not usually collected or saved because it had no value beyond those immediate uses. But machine learning can discern patterns and find meaningful information buried in this wealth of IoT data.

Collecting the right data is just one of the challenges to wider AI adoption. In the Lucas survey mentioned earlier, almost 90 percent of respondents said their organizations needed more guidance and direction for implementing AI-based solutions, and 8 in 10 believe there is a general lack of understanding about how AI can be used.

Cost was seen as the biggest perceived impediment to AI adoption among the survey respondents. But the cost for implementing AI-based systems for slotting and other warehouse optimization problems may actually be lower than traditional engineering approaches. In that respect, AI removes barriers to advanced DC optimization.

Notwithstanding the challenges both real and perceived all indications are that warehouses are eager to get started with AI-based solutions. Many DCs are getting started a lot sooner than operators themselves might have thought possible.

Joe Blazick leads the data science team at Lucas Systems, with overall responsibility for the development of advanced data science technologies and AI applications within the Lucas Warehouse Optimization Suite. Prior to Lucas he held research and management positions within the Data Science group at Dicks Sporting Goods, responsible for developing applications of AI for supply chain. Prior to his civilian career, Joe served for ten years in the U.S. Navy. He holds MS degrees in Finance and Statistics from Rochester Institute of Technology.

More here:
Artificial Intelligence In The Warehouse Is Coming Sooner Than You Might Think - Logistics Viewpoints - Logistics Viewpoints

CyVerse Receives $1.3M to Provide Cyberinfrastructure and Training for New NSF Artificial Intelligence Institute – University of Arizona News

CyVerse, National Science Foundation and Iowa State University

Today

The University of Arizona will take part in a $20 million institute that aims to transform agriculture through artificial intelligence.

The Artificial Intelligence Institute for Resilient Agriculture, led by Iowa State University and funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, will focus on innovative AI-driven methods for agriculture, promote the study of cyber-agricultural systems, and support education, workforce development and community engagement.

With $1.3 million from USDA-NIFA, CyVerse headquartered at the University of Arizona BIO5 Institute will provide the institute with expertise in cyberinfrastructure, along with education and engagement opportunities for Native Nations, farmers and community stakeholders to address how technological advances in AI can answer agricultural needs.

The Artificial Intelligence Institute for Resilient Agriculture, or AIIRA, is one of 11 new National Science Foundation National Artificial Intelligence Research Institutes, expanding upon seven institutes funded in 2020.

"These institutes are hubs for academia, industry and government to accelerate discovery and innovation in AI," said NSF Director Sethuraman Panchanathan. "Inspiring talent and ideas everywhere in this important area will lead to new capabilities that improve our lives, from medicine to entertainment to transportation and cybersecurity, and position us in the vanguard of competitiveness and prosperity."

The institutes are part of a $200 million federal effort to develop hubs for AI research that address national needs such as predicting severe weather, educating students in science and manufacturing new materials.

"These are problems that can't be answered by any individual," said Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, the Joseph C. and Elizabeth A. Anderlik Professor in Engineering at Iowa State University, who will lead the institute. "We need engineers, data scientists, plant scientists, social scientists, farmers, educators and entrepreneurs. AIIRA will bring all this expertise together."

"The University of Arizona's participation in this institute is an expression of our land-grant mission, and it speaks to our commitment to tackling some of the world's most pressing challenges and improving people's lives through innovation and thoughtful collaboration," said University of Arizona President Robert C. Robbins. "The work of AIIRA also aligns perfectly with our continued focus on the Fourth Industrial Revolution, in which the digital world, including cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence and robotics, converge with the physical and biological worlds."

Applying Precision Agriculture to a Changing Landscape

Modern technologies such as drones and rolling robots are already collecting detailed agricultural data, which can be used to create scientific modeling tools to help address farmers' most pressing questions, such as when to plant or how to allocate fertilizer and irrigation resources while minimizing environmental impact.

AIIRA, the project leaders say, brings together scientists, farmers, industry and government to adapt these technologies and encourage their adoption to help agriculture meet the needs of a growing population and increasingly climate-challenged planet.

"We want to make these methods accessible, affordable, and easily usable by farmers to make productive decisions," said AIIRA investigator Nirav Merchant, CyVerse co-principal investigator and director of UArizona's Data Science Institute. "Every farm is different in its own way, so a one-size-fits-all approach doesn't work. Regardless of the scale of the farm, we want to optimize these technologies for farmers' specific questions."

He added, "We have to prepare for our changing climate. There are limits on how much water and resources we will be able to use, but we can use AI to optimize the planting cycles and use of resources to reduce the stress in agriculture."

Providing Customized Training in Data Science

AIIRA will educate students, scientists, business people and farmers to understand and use new digital tools to make better decisions.

To help make the power of AI available to all, the CyVerse Training Team will work closely with The Carpentries a community initiative to teach software engineering and data science to develop customized workshops on using AI-powered tools and data to address specific research, community and stakeholder questions.

The training programs will be customized for various audiences, including AIIRA members, students, scientists, political leaders, agricultural stakeholders and Indigenous peoples.

Enhancing Native Nations' Data Sovereignty

Engagement with Native American communities which have been historically underrepresented and overlooked with regard to agricultural challenges, technological advancements and data rights and ownership is a key focus of CyVerse's work with AIIRA, said AIIRA investigator Stephanie Carroll, director of theCollaboratory for Indigenous Data Governance and associate director of the UArizona Native Nations Institute.

"We have a strong investment in encouraging Native student interest in data science and STEM careers," said Carroll, who is also an assistant professor of public health.

"Indigenous data sovereignty represents an effort to reassert authority over data and research so that Indigenous communities can govern and control the use, access and storage of their own data," she added.

Carroll co-created one of the nation's first classes on Indigenous data sovereignty, taught through the UArizona James E. Rogers College of Law and theNative Nations Institute'sIndigenous Governance Program. The class has inspired the creation of other such courses across the country and will be adapted to help the AIIRA initiative reach Native American communities and inform those working with Indigenous data.

Carroll and Merchant also plan to engage Indigenous farmers, community leaders and students in workshops designed to determine their agricultural questions and how Indigenous ways of knowing, AI technology and data can be leveraged to address their specific needs.

CyVerse's ultimate role in AIIRA is to integrate the project's many components, both through physical infrastructure and community engagement, Merchant said.

"The friction at the boundaries of these complex analyses, training communities, connecting resources that's where we'll be working," he said.

The University of Arizona is uniquely positioned to partipcate in AIIRA, said Elizabeth "Betsy" Cantwell, the university's senior vice president for research and innovation.

"The collaborationwith colleagues at Iowa State University allows us to integrate several of our strengths, both in terms of innovationand public outreach," Cantwellsaid."We are home to CyVerse and its cyberinfrastructure expertise. We are the land-grant university, giving us the agriculture perspective as well as partnerships with Arizona's 22 federally recognized tribes. With the accelerationof technology-based applications, the University of Arizona is uniquely positioned to meet real-world agricultural challenges with advanced solutions."

CyVerse is a federation of the University of Arizona, Texas Advanced Computing Center and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, funded by National Science Foundation award numbers DBI-0735191, DBI-1265383 and DBI-1743442.

AIIRA is led by Iowa State University with collaborators from Carnegie Melon University, New York University, the University of Arizona, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, George Mason University, the University of Missouri and the Iowa Soybean Association.

The National AI Research Institutes are funded at a combined $220 million and led by the NSF, in partnership with the USDA-NIFA, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Google, Amazon, Intel and Accenture.

See the rest here:
CyVerse Receives $1.3M to Provide Cyberinfrastructure and Training for New NSF Artificial Intelligence Institute - University of Arizona News

Scientists Look Up To Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Improve Solar Data from the Sun | The Weather Channel – Articles from The Weather Channel…

Image depicting Sun's solar cycles.

Researchers are using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to calibrate some of NASA's images of the Sun. Launched in 2010, NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has provided high-definition images of the Sun for over a decade.

The Atmospheric Imagery Assembly, or AIA, is one of two imaging instruments on SDO and looks constantly at the Sun, taking images across 10 wavelengths of ultraviolet light every 12 seconds.

This creates a wealth of information of the Sun like no other, but like all Sun-staring instrumentsAIA degrades over time, and the data needs to be frequently calibrated, NASA said in a statement.

To overcome this challenge, scientists decided to look at other options to calibrate the instrument, with an eye towards constant calibration.

Machine learning, a technique used in artificial intelligence, seemed like a perfect fit. To start, the team would teach the algorithm what a solar flare looked like by showing it solar flares across all of AIA's wavelengths until it recognised solar flares in all different types of light.

Once the programme can recognise a solar flare without any degradation, the algorithm can then determine how much degradation is affecting AIA's current images and how much calibration is needed for each.

"This was the big thing. Instead of just identifying it on the same wavelength, we're identifying structures across the wavelengths," said Dr Luiz Dos Santos, a solar physicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and lead author on the paper published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

"It's also important for deep space missions, which won't have the option of sounding rocket calibration. We're tackling two problems at once."

Since AIA looks at the Sun in multiple wavelengths of light, researchers can also use the algorithm to compare specific structures across the wavelengths and strengthen its assessments.

As machine learning advances, its scientific applications will expand to more and more missions.

"For the future, this may mean that deep space missionswhich travel to places where calibration rocket flights aren't possiblecan still be calibrated and continue giving accurate data, even when getting out to greater and greater distances from Earth or any stars," said NASA.

**

The above article has been published from a wire agency with minimal modifications to the headline and text.

View original post here:
Scientists Look Up To Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Improve Solar Data from the Sun | The Weather Channel - Articles from The Weather Channel...

Artificial intelligence could be the latest tool in fighting wildfires – Yahoo News

Reuters Videos

This desalination plant in Carlsbad, California - the largest in the Western Hemisphere - produces 50 million gallons of drinking water daily enough for 400 thousand homes in San Diego County.And now, as Western states face an epic drought, Poseidon Water - which operates the plant - could soon get approval to build another desalination plant this time, near a power plant in Huntington Beach.And environmentalists arent happy about it."It's great to be water independent, and we should be striving for that. But we should be doing it in a responsible way. And desalinated water is not the way to go.Andrea Leon-Grossmann is with the ocean conservation group Azul.This is the most expensive way to source water, it's the most energy intensive way to do it. And the way it decimates the ocean, both by the intake and by how we're dumping brine back into the ocean, is really, it should be the last resort, not the first way for sourcing water.Desalination - at its most basic - removes salt water from ocean water, making it fresh and drinkable.But the intake method is problematic, according to environmentalists, who say that tiny organisms such as larvae and plankton get killed in the process.Poseidon is now required to add finer intake screens to protect more fish. Poseidon - which has been trying to build the Huntington plant for 22 years and some $100 million has been spent navigating state regulations - insists the new project will actually help the environment. VP of Poseidon Water, Scott Maloni:In the case of Huntington Beach, the total quantity of impact would be no more than 0.02 percent of the plankton at risk of being entrained. There's no threatened or endangered species that are at risk, and the mitigation that's in place will ensure that the project will be a net environmental benefit, by producing more habitat that will be impacted by the operation of the facility.A regional water board has approved a permit for the project on condition that the company increase its commitment to rehabilitate a nearby wetlands reserve and build an artificial reef. There is one last major regulatory hurdle; the California Coastal Commission, which is expected to vote before the end of the year.Despite the opposition from conservationists, the company feels confident enough to talk of breaking ground by the end of 2022 on the $1.4 billion plant that would produce tens of millions of gallons of drinking water daily Much needed good news for communities struggling with the ravages of drought.For Poseidons Scott Maloni, its a no brainer telling Reuters: The Pacific Ocean is the largest reservoir in the world and it's always full.

View post:
Artificial intelligence could be the latest tool in fighting wildfires - Yahoo News

The EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act Could Become A Brake On Innovation – Finextra

Europe is lagging behind not only the US and Japan, but also Chinain terms of technological innovation. According to a2019 article on World Economic Forum(WEF), China overtook the EU with R&D expenditure equivalent to 2.1% of GDP.The worlds 15 largest digital firms are not European!

It is beyond question that Europe produces bright minds with amazing ideas and an entrepreneurial mindset. The problem is very simple:European companies do not make it beyond the start-up phase and if they do, their business is believed to be better off out of Europe. Skype is one famous example that was bought up by Microsoft. As a result, Europe is facing an annual contraction phase when it comes to market capitalisation of the Top 100 companies.

Source:https://www.economist.com/briefing/2021/06/05/once-a-corporate-heavyweight-europe-is-now-an-also-ran-can-it-recover-its-footing

The EU proposal to regulate AI will be a brake on innovation and a a challenge not to be underestimated for promising start-ups that are using artificial intelligence.According to a report of the Washington-based think tank Center for Data Innovation,a new law regulating artificial intelligence in Europe could cost the EU economy 3.1 billion over the next five years. This week, the European Commission published its proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence of the EU putting forth new rules on the use of artificial intelligence in the EU.The realization of AI projects will become significantly more difficult with the new law and leaving developing their business further outside the EU will almost certainly be likely for ambitious entrepreneurs. The US, China and Japanwould welcome them with open arms.

The regulation framework proposed in the White Paper is based on the idea that development and use of artificial intelligence entails high risks for fundamental rights, consumer rights and safety. The proposal aims to ban AI systems that harm people, manipulate their behaviour, opinions and decisions, or deliberately exploit their vulnerabilities for mass surveillance. Distributors, importers, users and other third parties would also be obliged to make significant changes to artificial intelligence, market it under their own name, change its purpose or discourage adaptive use.

Source:https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai

Key features include training, data and record keeping requirements, providing information, technology accuracy and robustness, human supervision and specific requirements for certain AI applications such as the use of biometric remote recognition. In addition to existing legislation, the European Commission is proposing a voluntary labelling scheme for low-risk AI applications not subject to mandatory requirements.

European officials also want to restrict the police use of facial recognition and to ban the use of certain types of AI systems - one of the broader efforts to regulate high-risk applications of artificial intelligence. The EU pushes forward with the first of its kind of rules on artificial intelligence (AI) amid fears that the technology is beyond the reach of regulators. Proponents of the rules say adequate human oversight is needed for artificial intelligence. Others warn that the world's first rules on how companies use artificial intelligence (AI) could hinder innovation with lasting economic consequences. The regulatory and policy developments in the first quarter of 2021 reflect a global turning point for serious regulation of artificial intelligence in the USA and Europe, with massive implications for technology companies and government agencies. The efforts to monitor the use of artificial intelligence are no surprise to anyone who has followed policy developments in recent years, but the EU is undoubtedly pushing for stricter oversight at this time.

To meet its global AI ambitions, the EU has joined forces with as-minded states to consolidate its global vision of how AI should be used. This includes the geopolitical dimension of the European Commission's forthcoming new legislative proposal on artificial intelligence. Meanwhile, domestic AI policy is continuing to take shape in the United States, but it is largely focused on ensuring international competitiveness and strengthening national security capabilities.

On 11 February 2021, the European Union (ENISA) and the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission released a joint report on the cybersecurity risks associated with the use of artificial intelligence in autonomous vehicles. The report makes recommendations on how to mitigate such risks in a cybersecurity report. In June 2019, Chinas National New Generation Artificial Intelligence Governance Committee predicted harmony, fairness, justice, respect for privacy, security, transparency, accountability, cooperation and ethical principles for controlling AI development.

Europe is discovering AI, and the European Commission has recognised the need to take action to cope with the technological changes caused by AI technologies. The European Union surely wants to avoid the worst of artificial intelligence while at the same time trying to increase its potential for the economy in general. According to a draft of future EU rules obtained by Politico, the EU will ban certain applications of high-risk artificial intelligence systems and will prohibit others from entering the bloc if they do not meet EU standards.Companies that fail to comply could be fined up to 20 million euros, or 4 percent of their turnover. Proposals to require non-medical algorithms to conduct pre-market studies could also harm the development of artificial intelligence, as these studies are time-consuming and expensive. For example, fifty US states, such as New York, require autonomous vehicle manufacturers to conduct road tests under the paid supervision of the police, but testing such vehicles is expensive.

Respondents attach great importance to the EU's role in shaping a coherent strategic vision for technology policy, with 70% describing it as "very important" or "somewhat important.".This is not surprising given its prominent role in digital regulation and ambitious regulatory agenda.Digital Services Act, Digital Markets Act, Data Governance, Cloud Rules and Cybersecurity, GDPR, just to name some examples. In all these areas the role of members states has been rated worse than that of the EU, showing recognition of the desire and need for multi-level coordination between the EU and individual member states, as well as the role of each of them.

The EU's artificial intelligence act has caused high waves within a few hours after its becoming known. However, its advantages should not be neglected. Algorithmic accountability for example requires operators to use algorithms to make decisions that comply with laws that regulate people's actions, such as anti-discrimination laws and attitudes. In addition,the EU Commission is considering a temporary ban on use of facial recognition technology in public spaces for the next 3-5 years. In contrast, more than 600 law enforcement agencies in the US have started using the ClearView app. In the USA, states such as New York and Oregon, as well as a number of cities have responded to these developments by banning facial recognition technologies from police and government.

The idea of regulating AI is not a bad one.If technology organizations are not responsible for the way they use personal data, we are creating a predatory world. We tend to assume that the real world has one set of rules and the digital world has another set of rules. The truth is that we have only one world. Criticism towards the EU's aspirations mustbe voiced in the sense that many companies are still trying to adjust to the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The EU's highly anticipated comprehensive privacy regulations should have changed the Internet for the better, but so far it has mostly frustrated users, businesses, and regulators.So it stands to reason and we are well advised to prepare ourselves for an AI act full of challenges. At the same time, it is to be hoped that important lessons have been learned from the GDPR.

Original post:
The EU's Artificial Intelligence Act Could Become A Brake On Innovation - Finextra

Columbus-based health care software startup Olive is valued at $4 billion. So what exactly does the company do? – The Columbus Dispatch

Sean Lane, the CEO of health care artificial intelligence firmOlive AI, believes the future of the U.S.workforce is a combination of human labor and artificial intelligence people and technology working side-by-side. Lane wants to see Olive have a role in that force.

The Columbus-based software company, which grew exponentially during the pandemic, tripling to 600 employees, continues to expand, and it closed a $400 million funding round July 1 andwas valued at $4 billion.

In an interview with the Dispatch, Lane broke down the firm's somewhat complex business, talked about the meaning behind the name "Olive," and described the brightfuture he sees in Columbus tech.

Dispatch: What Olive does is pretty high-tech, and its a little complicated. In laymans terms, could you break down what Olive does, and what problems the company is working to solve?

Lane: First and foremost, health care doesnt have the internet. Thats the biggest problem. You see that every time you go to a doctors office you have to fill out the same form, every single time. Its like health care doesnt know who you are. Thats because the systems arent connected and they dont talk to each other and the software doesnt talk to each other. Olive is really automation that connects all of those things together. We use artificial intelligence to do it, to create this workforce of AI (artificial intelligence) workers, that provide automation to connect everything together, to take on a lot of the administrative burdens, to work on these workflows inside health care, so that ultimately, the experience of health care is much more like what you get in other areas that have the internet, from shopping to hotels or anything else.

AI in Columbus:: Path Robotics CEO wants Columbus to be 'next big mecca' for robots

Could you describe Olives customer base for me? Our customer base today is about 80% health systems around the country. We have about 900 hospitals as our customers, and then also insurance companies, health plans. That constitutes the other portion of our customer base.

Whats the meaning behind the name Olive? We decided that, to do this, we wanted to create an artificial intelligence, which means we wanted it to be difficult to distinguish from a human as it is working. Olive, herself, takes on the persona, so we picked a persons name. The cool thing about Olive is its a thing and its a persons name, but it also has the word live in it. You say it 'all of'the time without realizing it: Because all of is the same as Olive. The O is a pretty iconic symbol, and really, these workflows are like circuits, theyre these circles and loops. Youll see the circular kind of name in a lot of things we do.

Ive noticed it in just reading about the company: Olive is kind of her own person. Yeah, thats right. We wanted Olive to take on a persona, like part of your team. Olive is a part of your team. Its hospitals and at these insurance companies providing automation. We think that theres a new workforce, for the future, and that workforce contains humans and AI workers. Olive is one of those AI workers. The way we think about that is, health systems in the future are going to have AI workers, an AI workforce. Olive is just one of those employees.

The Dispatch has previously covered this, but could you tell me a little bit, in your own words, about The Grid and your workforce model at Olive as we sort of emerge from the pandemic? We had always believed that the greatest companies in the world were built in one building, and that that was kind of the way to do it. Once the pandemic happened, and we were out of the building, a lot of those assumptions basically didnt hold any water. They werent true, and we kind of invalidated assumption after assumption about being in one building. We decided that the best approach for us, moving forward, was to get rid of the word remote, get rid of the word work from home, and allow people to work from wherever theyd like. Wed only have two statuses: On the grid and off the grid. So youre either working or youre not working working from home is not less of a status than working in an office. We adopted this new model, we then started recruiting around the country. And you know, it worked. The great thing about it is, it allowed us to scale super, super fast. We needed to hire a ton of people, and really the only way we could have done it was with adopting The Grid.

The Grid at Olive AI:Olive is hiring big time, and most of its new employees don't live in Columbus

Big news came at the start of the month when Olives most recent valuation had it at $4 billion. Could you describe what this means for the company? Its another milestone in our growth. The reality is, our company is just getting started. Were close to 1,000 customers, close to 1,000 employees. Weve raised close to $1 billion dollars. But the reality is, its still the very, very early stages of this company. We have so much to do, so many products to build, so many new customers to expand to. Its a great milestone because it just proves that what were doing is important to the world, and specifically, to the health care industry.

Is there anything else that you wanted to talk about? I would just say that we are trying to build a technology company for health care that can invest significant resources into R&D (research and development) the same way that tech companies do for other industries. Health care is not going to be the laggard anymore, health care is not going to take the seconds of technology from other industries. This is the moment for health care to be the leader in technology, the same way the defense industry led the creation of Silicon Valley, the same way the space race led to a lot of the creation, again, of Silicon Valley. Health care innovation can lead to the creation of something really special. Columbus is one of the best places in the country to grow a startup, as weve shown. Its not that Silicon Valley is going away. Its just getting bigger, and the idea of Silicon Valley now exists in Columbus, Ohio.

sdonaldson@dispatch.com

@SarahEDon

Read the original here:
Columbus-based health care software startup Olive is valued at $4 billion. So what exactly does the company do? - The Columbus Dispatch

Artificial Intelligence in HR is Balancing Tech and Touch – Analytics Insight

Recently, the pandemic has pushed digital transformation to the front of the line. While collaborative tools allowed us to work from home and maintain close contact with our co-workers, the next step is just around the corner, thanks to artificial intelligence and machine learning. In every element of the company, the pandemic is driving a move towards a hybrid work paradigm, changing peoples management and the way we work. Enterprises are on the verge of digital transformation and the use of artificial intelligence in HR departments will accelerate this process. Digital transformation improves the customer experience while also unlocking new value.

The adoption of artificial intelligence is a significant driver of digital transformation. While there are numerous definitions and explanations of artificial intelligence, Deloittes is the most straightforward and relatable. It says, Artificial intelligence is the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks, that normally require human intelligence. Visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making under ambiguity, learning, and language translation are just a few examples. This approach, which defines AI in terms of activities performed by people rather than how humans think, allows us to consider real-world applications.

Artificial intelligence has spawned a subset of cognitive technologies that are improving with time at doing certain activities that were previously solely performed by humans. The application of these cognitive technologies, either alone or in combination, is what gives Artificial Intelligence its strength. Cognitive technologies include, deep and machine learning, natural language processing (NLP), and robotics process automation, which are already at the forefront of a substantial revolution in the design and delivery of work processes in companies. Organizations are rapidly increasing their use of these technologies to completely reimagine their work architectures due to their ability to perform a wide range of tasks ranging from analyzing numbers, texts, and images to digital and physical tasks that lead to potential gains in efficiency and productivity.

From a practical standpoint, some of the applications of these technologies in Human resources and business are further highlighted.

It may be utilized in any sector where huge volumes of data must be analyzed quickly and predictive models must be developed. It might be utilized in Human resources for predictive talent management, as well as in business for sales forecasting and other purposes.

It may be applied to situations in which a significant amount of data must be analyzed and judgments made. If accompanied by adequate algorithmic tools, CV shortlisting in Human Resources might be a viable option. Other developing fields include gaining information from judicial procedures, customer feedback, and so forth. NLP and machine learning are used by a chatbot. For employee inquiry resolution, several Digital Human Resource systems use chatbots.

The technique is similar to that used in natural language processing (NLP), but with the added problems of various accents, ambient noise, and so on. Siri, Amazon Alexa, and other voice-based chatbots are just a few examples.

This technology allows you to distinguish between objects, pictures, and scenes. Face recognition for attendance is a fairly widespread usage in offices. Advanced applications might include better medical diagnosis and treatment of x-ray pictures.

It integrates technology such as computer vision, machine learning, high-tech sensors, actuators, and other well-engineered components into a device capable of duplicating human motor abilities while operating in high-fatigue and dangerous environments. In industries, repetitive physical operations such as lifting, loading, and unloading may simply be automated.

Artificial intelligence (AI) will revolutionize efficiency, enhance employee engagement, sharpen talent management and make processes more adaptable if it is used wisely. Accuracy in data capture is a crucial success element in AI deployment. The future rests in finding a balance between managing people and utilizing data to make employee-employer communication as smooth as possible. Maintaining the important cultural element in any organization requires a combination of technology enablement, empathy, and human touch.

The pandemics last fifteen months have taught us the value of empathy and compassion for one another in both our personal and professional lives. If applied correctly, Artificial intelligences capabilities can be a wonderful chance to speed up objective and fact-based decision-making while still allowing for solid human judgment. We observed an exploding use of AI in HR, with socially concerned but tech-savvy individuals using it to connect people to hospital beds, oxygen cylinders, and medications, among other things. The GOIs ArogyaSetu App is an excellent illustration of how AI may be used to safeguard the countrys inhabitants. Vaccination will be the only way to survive the pandemic. This opens up a big window of opportunity for artificial intelligence to be used to make the world a safer place.

Share This ArticleDo the sharing thingy

Excerpt from:
Artificial Intelligence in HR is Balancing Tech and Touch - Analytics Insight

6 Startups That Are Reinventing Markets with Artificial Intelligence in 2021 – Entrepreneur

July26, 20216 min read

With the evolution of technology, every business is now moving forward to incorporate artificial intelligence in a way that provides a seamless experience to the customers as well as the employees. Be it a well reputed brand or a small startup, everyone focuses on making the B2B or B2C processes more efficient. AI makes it possible in reality by rendering fully automated customer support solutions, managing the in-house workflow, or providing a more trusted solution to the businesses to understand their audience. Hence, no matter what product you are manufacturing or services you are offering, using AI powered technologies in your business is a must if you want to thrive in this 21st century.

[soros]

Q2 2021 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

Here, weve mentioned 6 best startups that are reinventing markets with artificial intelligence. If you presume that all companies are just jumping into a future that may or may not arrive, then you must know that Signal AI has performed a survey on 1,000 C-suite directors from companies with 500+ employees. They found that 85% of the leaders thought they could generate 20% more revenue if AI would have helped differently in decision making for their businesses. Now you can easily understand why you must pick up the best AI technologies to empower your business.

WhiteBox HR is a company that works on the human resources domain. The company has developed a talent acquisition and management software using ML algorithms. This UAE-based startup has already received a lot of appreciation for offering robust analytics and AI support for the growth of the employees which eventually ensures the employers growth. They provide a bias free, predictive insight throughout the talent lifecycle with convincible data analysis and people science.

WhiteBox HR has come up to the industry with a goal of indulging and nurturing gender equality inside the workspace. The best part about WhiteBoxs AI driven technology is that the insights you get through the system is explainable and constantly monitored by professionals. Therefore, the whole process of decision making on whether to hire, nurture, and invest on a talent or not becomes much more transparent as one can understand how these insights are made. If you want to scale the hiring process in your company, choosing WhiteBox HRs AI powered technology will be a good option.

This South African based startup has developed an AI solution for radiologists, named CheXRad. Accrad has made the X-ray process more convincing with which a revolution of AI powered technology entered the Healthcare sector. CheXRad works in a highly automated way and analyses a chest radiograph against thousands other healthy scans to mark and locate the area of infection. Including Covid-19, there are 15 more diseases that can be diagnosed with this AI solution.

Doctors from different healthcare units have tested its accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. They found CheXRad to be a completely reliable solution which increases the efficiency of a medical facility while minimising the time it takes for manual diagnosis. Not only that, CheXRad also provides a 160x faster solution for pathology diagnosis. Yes, certain pathologies in chest radiographs can be revealed in a minimum time frame with CheXRad while adhering to the pre-mentioned metrics, i.e., accuracy. Hence, if you belong to the Healthcare sector and looking for a dependable solution to serve more patients, get on board with Accrad to eliminate the time constraints.

Flirtini is a dating app that uses AI and machine learning to offer its users the perfect match while taking care of their privacy and security. Flirtini uses AI neural networks to filter fake accounts and inappropriate content. While using a dating app, catfishing, financial scams, phasing become a huge concern among the users even if you are using the most popular dating platform. But with the inclusion of AI, things can be much more secure these days.

Flirtini not only uses AI to ensure security, but matchmaking also becomes much easier. By using the state of the art technology, the application can identify common facial features from the users display pictures that you swap left or right. Therefore you won't have to scroll through hundreds of profiles before you can find someone of your interest.

Reekon, another application powered by artificial intelligence has received huge appreciation among its users. It's a customer service automation platform. The application allows businesses to resolve customer queries from all communication channels through an automated process.

Thus, as you integrate Reekon with your business processes you can easily automate customer requested actions and tasks. The application analyzes customer tickets from email, live chat, calls or any other social channels. After that, it generates answers or viable resolutions as per service database, previous interaction history, products and knowledgebase without any human interaction. Not only that but with Reekon you can categorize and assign tasks to the most appropriate teams.

You might already know how social media impacts every business these days. An Australian startup, Delta AI leverages the business owners with high-accuracy AI powered tools to distinguish between the real and fake social media content. This way, you get a clear overview of how your product is used around the world. Delta AI unveils such parts of a video content which may be invisible to traditional text-based searches.

Delta AI has been helping different brands to recognise the true value of their products to the customers with their AI powered technology. This way, brands have got to find the perfect psychological trigger to market their products and make strategic approaches to the audience, with complete accuracy.

teX.ai offers AI based software for text extraction from your company's mail box, website, social media handles, text messages, or any document archives of your choice. In this 21st century, with data being the bread and butter for businesses across the globe, data handling has become an avid challenge.

teX.ai offers an apt solution to analyze text genre, group similarities among content and create optimum summaries. That's how your business can have the right data stored from the right source.

AI powered technology can be a real game changer for the businesses just entering the market. You might not know that even the fitness app you use in your phone uses AI to make customised fitness plans for you. Not only that but the use of AI on dating apps ensures full-proof safety and easy matchmaking for the users. Artificial intelligence is the future. So no matter what business youre into, finding the suitable AI tech and incorporating it in the system, is the need of the hour!

Original post:
6 Startups That Are Reinventing Markets with Artificial Intelligence in 2021 - Entrepreneur

Wisconsin Senator’s Social Media Bill Aims To Save The First Amendment By Violating The First Amendment – Techdirt

from the [headed-to-the-ER-to-get-my-third-degree-stupid-burns-treated] dept

Grandstands and bandwagons: that's what's headed to Social Media Town. Professional victims -- far too many of them earning public money -- have produced a steady stream of stupid legislation targeting social media platforms for supposedly "censoring" the kind of the content they really like: "conservative views." Convinced by failed-businessman-turned-failed-president Donald Trump (and his herd of Capitol Hill toadies) that social media has it in for anyone but the leftiest leftists, a bunch of legislators have hacked up "anti-censorship" bills that aim to protect free speech by trampling on free speech.

The latest (but surely not the last) legislator to grab his bandstand and board the bandwagon is Wisconsin state Senator Julian Bradley. Bradley seems convinced his low Twitter polling must be due to social media companies keeping him down.

Big tech is silencing the things I say, Bradley explained Monday morning. They are silencing and shadow banning, theyre blocking any information that I am putting out.

And he has a message for Big Social Media:

"Free expression is one of the most vital components of our democratic republic. We must ensure our citizens can engage in political speech unfiltered and uncensored by Big Tech. It's time for Facebook and Twitter to consistently and fairly enforce their own rules."

How does Bradley hope to protect free speech from the censorship private companies can't actually commit? By violating their free speech rights, of course. From the bill [PDF] Bradley says he's filing but actually has yet to file [as of July 14th, anyway]:

The bill prohibits a social media platform from using post prioritization (prioritizing certain content ahead of, below, or in a more or less prominent position than others in a newsfeed, feed, view, or search results) on content or material posted by or about a candidate for state or local office or an elected official who holds a state, local, or national office.

The bill also prohibits a social media platform from knowingly censoring, deplatforming (deleting or banning from the social media platform for more than 60 days), or shadow banning (limiting or eliminating the exposure of a user, or content posted by a user, to other users of the social media platform) a candidate for state or local office or an elected official who holds a state, local, or national office.

This compelled speech that favors only certain people is shoved into the bill alongside language that says social media companies must treat everyone equally.

Under the bill, a social media platform must publish the standards it uses for determining how to censor, deplatform, and shadow ban users on the platform. A social media platform must apply censorship, deplatforming, and shadow banning standards in a consistent manner among its users on the platform.

All social media patrons must be treated equally... except for politicians and would-be politicians, who will be statutorily more equal than others. Failure to carry compelled speech or apply rules "consistently" will potentially cost social media companies hundreds of thousands of dollars (if not millions per claim). And "consistency" will be defined literally on a case-by-case basis since the new law would create a private cause of action against qualifying social media platforms.

Bradley doesn't seem to know or care whether his proposal is constitutional. All he knows is he's pretty sure it's ok for the government to compel speech when courts have ruled government officials can't cut off citizens from interacting with them.

Bradley is quick to point-out that judges have ruled lawmakers and other elected officials cannot block or ban people from commenting on their posts, even if those comments are negative or ugly. The courts have ruled, essentially, that social media is the new public town hall and some online speech is protected.

Bradley is right... at least as far as getting the gist of recent court decisions. But he's wrong when he clarifies his own position:

Bradley said he is using this same logic to say that social media platforms shouldn't be able to ban elected officials, no matter the language they use.

Ah. Well then. Good luck using that "same logic" in court. This isn't junior high debate class, you rube. This is the Constitution. "This same logic" doesn't apply when there are two very clear and very distinct sets of rules that govern private companies and public servants. Public servants can't prevent the public from participating in their own governance. Private companies are free to pick and choose whose content they'll host. And social media services have cut elected officials a lot of slack over the years, keeping accounts alive that would have been shut down much earlier if platforms enforced rules consistently.

Bradley wants to create a carve-out for public officials in both the Constitution and social media platforms' terms of service. That's utter bullshit and shouldn't be tolerated by either his government cohorts or the people he's supposed to be representing.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyones attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise and every little bit helps. Thank you.

The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: 1st amendment, content moderation, julian bradley, section 230, social media, wisconsin

Read this article:

Wisconsin Senator's Social Media Bill Aims To Save The First Amendment By Violating The First Amendment - Techdirt

What Is the Future of Social Media Regulation? – The Regulatory Review

Justice Thomas signals the potential for regulation of social media platforms and their power over speech.

In early April, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of Biden v. Knight First Amendment Institute. The ruling was largely insignificant, as the Court held that the case was moot. The concurrence issued by Justice Clarence Thomas, however, sent both the legal world and many parts of the internet abuzz. In his opinion, Justice Thomas issued the first words from the Supreme Court concerning the current debate around the power of social media platforms, writing:

Todays digital platforms provide avenues for historically unprecedented amounts of speech, including speech by government actors. Also unprecedented, however, is the concentrated control of so much speech in the hands of a few private parties. We will soon have no choice but to address how our legal doctrines apply to highly concentrated, privately owned information infrastructure such as digital platforms.

Although most Americans agree that social media companies have too much political power, consensus on the appropriate government response has been far more elusive. Some states have already begun to take some degree of action against perceived biases in online platforms. In Texas, for example, a proposed law would treat social media companies like common carriers and prohibit deplatforming based on viewpoint. Also, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has proposed a law that would protect political candidates from being banned on social media.

Justice Thomass concurrence appears to favor a position similar to the proposed Texas law. In his opinion, he cited the 1994 case Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, in which the Court required cable operators to carry broadcast signals. Discussing Turner, Justice Thomas questioned whyif telephone companies are required to act as common carriersdigital platforms could not be treated in a similar fashion.

In addition, even accepting the private property arguments made by opponents of social media regulation, some form of regulation would not be unprecedented. In his opinion, Justice Thomas cited PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, in which the Court concluded that a state could require a shopping mall to allow protesters to engage in advocacy on private mall property. Similarly, the Court or a legislature could find that citizens have a constitutional right to voice their opinions on social media platforms, despite the private nature of these platforms.

If states begin to pass legislation requiring social media platforms to host any speaker under the reasoning of PruneYard, they could set up a legal battle with the platforms that have used Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act as a justification for free reign in curating the users of their services. In analyzing Justice Thomass opinion, law professor Eugene Volokh of the University of California, Los Angeles wrote that the justice is anticipating what might be done through legislation, and whether new state laws that do treat platforms as common carriers (more or less) are going to be seen as blocked by the First Amendment or Section 230. Volokh predicts that is an issue the Court will likely have to deal with in coming years. Unless something changes dramatically in how social media companies operate or in the state of political discourse, it seems almost inevitable that this debate will come to a head in the courts.

Much of the current debate echoes similar discussions throughout the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s about the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) fairness doctrine. The fairness doctrine required broadcasters that devoted a portion of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest to also air contrasting views on those matters. The fairness doctrine was at the center of the case Red Lion Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission. It was upheld by the Supreme Court but the FCC abandoned the doctrine in 1987. Some commentators have noted that Justice Thomass opinion sounds like a call for a revival of some form of the fairness doctrine.

As a concurrence, Justice Thomass opinion does not set any precedent. But it signals that at least one justice is concerned with the current state of the First Amendment. After decades in which online platforms have relied on the protections afforded them by Section 230, is some form of platform regulation possible?

It seems unlikely that a majority of the Court will decide in the foreseeable future to curtail the independence of social media platforms. Law professor Steve Vladeck of the University of Texas at Austin noted that the bigger story behind Justice Thomass opinion is that no other member of the Court chose to join him.

For now, the Court is not likely to move one way or another on social media regulation. If, however, some of the proposed state legislation on the matter becomes law, the Court may not have any choice but to address the issue.

Eric Cervone is a lawyer who writes about issues relating to free speech.

Read more:

What Is the Future of Social Media Regulation? - The Regulatory Review