Your Code of Conduct | Open Source Guides

Why do I need a code of conduct?

A code of conduct is a document that establishes expectations for behavior for your projects participants. Adopting, and enforcing, a code of conduct can help create a positive social atmosphere for your community.

Codes of conduct help protect not just your participants, but yourself. If you maintain a project, you may find that unproductive attitudes from other participants can make you feel drained or unhappy about your work over time.

A code of conduct empowers you to facilitate healthy, constructive community behavior. Being proactive reduces the likelihood that you, or others, will become fatigued with your project, and helps you take action when someone does something you dont agree with.

Try to establish a code of conduct as early as possible: ideally, when you first create your project.

In addition to communicating your expectations, a code of conduct describes the following:

Wherever you can, use prior art. The Contributor Covenant is a drop-in code of conduct that is used by over 40,000 open source projects, including Kubernetes, Rails, and Swift.

The Django Code of Conduct and the Citizen Code of Conduct are also two good code of conduct examples.

Place a CODE_OF_CONDUCT file in your projects root directory, and make it visible to your community by linking it from your CONTRIBUTING or README file.

A code of conduct that isnt (or cant be) enforced is worse than no code of conduct at all: it sends the message that the values in the code of conduct arent actually important or respected in your community.

Ada Initiative

You should explain how your code of conduct will be enforced before a violation occurs. There are several reasons to do so:

It demonstrates that you are serious about taking action when its needed.

Your community will feel more reassured that complaints actually get reviewed.

Youll reassure your community that the review process is fair and transparent, should they ever find themselves investigated for a violation.

You should give people a private way (such as an email address) to report a code of conduct violation and explain who receives that report. It could be a maintainer, a group of maintainers, or a code of conduct working group.

Dont forget that someone might want to report a violation about a person who receives those reports. In this case, give them an option to report violations to someone else. For example, @ctb and @mr-c explain on their project, khmer:

Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported by emailing khmer-project@idyll.org which only goes to C. Titus Brown and Michael R. Crusoe. To report an issue involving either of them please email Judi Brown Clarke, Ph.D. the Diversity Director at the BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, an NSF Center for Science and Technology.*

For inspiration, check out Djangos enforcement manual (though you may not need something this comprehensive, depending on the size of your project).

Sometimes, despite your best efforts, somebody will do something that violates this code. There are several ways to address negative or harmful behavior when it comes up.

Treat each community members voice as important as your own. If you receive a report that someone violated the code of conduct, take it seriously and investigate the matter, even if it does not match your own experience with that person. Doing so signals to your community that you value their perspective and trust their judgment.

The community member in question may be a repeat offender who consistently makes others feel uncomfortable, or they may have only said or done something once. Both can be grounds for taking action, depending on context.

Before you respond, give yourself time to understand what happened. Read through the persons past comments and conversations to better understand who they are and why they might have acted in such a way. Try to gather perspectives other than your own about this person and their behavior.

Dont get pulled into an argument. Dont get sidetracked into dealing with someone elses behavior before youve finished dealing with the matter at hand. Focus on what you need.

Stephanie Zvan, So Youve Got Yourself a Policy. Now What?

After gathering and processing sufficient information, youll need to decide what to do. As you consider your next steps, remember that your goal as a moderator is to foster a safe, respectful, and collaborative environment. Consider not only how to deal with the situation in question, but how your response will affect the rest of your communitys behavior and expectations moving forward.

When somebody reports a code of conduct violation, it is your, not their, job to handle it. Sometimes, the reporter is disclosing information at great risk to their career, reputation, or physical safety. Forcing them to confront their harasser could put the reporter in a compromising position. You should handle direct communication with the person in question, unless the reporter explicitly requests otherwise.

There are a few ways you might respond to a code of conduct violation:

Give the person in question a public warning and explain how their behavior negatively impacted others, preferably in the channel where it occurred. Where possible, public communication conveys to the rest of the community that you take the code of conduct seriously. Be kind, but firm in your communication.

Privately reach out to the person in question to explain how their behavior negatively impacted others. You may want to use a private communication channel if the situation involves sensitive personal information. If you communicate with someone privately, its a good idea to CC those who first reported the situation, so they know you took action. Ask the reporting person for consent before CCing them.

Sometimes, a resolution cannot be reached. The person in question may become aggressive or hostile when confronted or does not change their behavior. In this situation, you may want to consider taking stronger action. For example:

Suspend the person in question from the project, enforced through a temporary ban on participating in any aspect of the project

Permanently ban the person from the project

Banning members should not be taken lightly and represents a permanent and irreconcilable difference of perspectives. You should only take these measures when it is clear that a resolution cannot be reached.

A code of conduct is not a law that is enforced arbitrarily. You are the enforcer of the code of conduct and its your responsibility to follow the rules that the code of conduct establishes.

As a maintainer you establish the guidelines for your community and enforce those guidelines according to the rules set forth in your code of conduct. This means taking any report of a code of conduct violation seriously. The reporter is owed a thorough and fair review of their complaint. If you determine that the behavior that they reported is not a violation, communicate that clearly to them and explain why youre not going to take action on it. What they do with that is up to them: tolerate the behavior that they had an issue with, or stop participating in the community.

A report of behavior that doesnt technically violate the code of conduct may still indicate that there is a problem in your community, and you should investigate this potential problem and act accordingly. This may include revising your code of conduct to clarify acceptable behavior and/or talking to the person whose behavior was reported and telling them that while they did not violate the code of conduct, they are skirting the edge of what is expected and are making certain participants feel uncomfortable.

In the end, as a maintainer, you set and enforce the standards for acceptable behavior. You have the ability to shape the community values of the project, and participants expect you to enforce those values in a fair and even-handed way.

When a project seems hostile or unwelcoming, even if its just one person whose behavior is tolerated by others, you risk losing many more contributors, some of whom you may never even meet. Its not always easy to adopt or enforce a code of conduct, but fostering a welcoming environment will help your community grow.

Continue reading here:

Your Code of Conduct | Open Source Guides

Code of Conduct | Meta Open Source – Facebook

Our Pledge

In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as contributors and maintainers pledge to make participation in our project and our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment include:

Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:

Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to any instances of unacceptable behavior.

Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful.

This Code of Conduct applies within all project spaces, and it also applies when an individual is representing the project or its community in public spaces. Examples of representing a project or community include using an official project e-mail address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project may be further defined and clarified by project maintainers.

This Code of Conduct also applies outside the project spaces when there is a reasonable belief that an individual's behavior may have a negative impact on the project or its community.

Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported by contacting the project team at opensource-conduct@fb.com. All complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident. Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good faith may face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other members of the projects leadership.

Read the original:

Code of Conduct | Meta Open Source - Facebook

Biden Upset Twitter Censorship Rules Will No Longer Benefit Him?

At a campaign event Friday, President Joe Biden complained about upcoming changes to Twitters censorship rules.

It seems the president is not happy that Musk plans to implement the platforms content moderation rules fairly.

Politicoreported that Biden said that Twitter is an outfit that spews lies all across the world.

Last week, NewsBusters reported Musks declaration that Twitters new content moderation team would consist of widely diverse viewpoints.

Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with widely diverse viewpoints, Musk tweeted. No major content decisions or account reinstatements will happen before that council convenes.

Changes to the platforms content moderation rules are long overdue.

During the 2020 presidential election, the rules overwhelmingly benefited Biden and other Democrats who ran for election.

In April, MRC Free Speech America published its report of 646 cases in its CensorTrack database of pro-Biden censorship between March 10, 2020, and March 10, 2022.

Additionally, MRC also found that Big Techs censorship of New York Post stories covering the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop helped sway the 2020 presidential election for the president.

Biden could also be concerned that the extent of the administrations reported collusion with Big Tech social media platforms could soon become public.

NewsBusters reported that a federal court ordered the depositions of key officials in the Biden administration in a lawsuit that alleges Facebook and Twitter censored certain content about COVID-19 to prevent the spread of misinformation.

In a press release last month, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt said the depositions of Biden officials will force these officials to come clean to the American people.

After finding documentation of a collusive relationship between the Biden Administration and social media companies to censor free speech, we immediately filed a motion to get these officials under oath, he said. It is high time we shine a light on this censorship enterprise and force these officials to come clean to the American people, and this ruling will allow us to do just that. Well keep pressing for the truth.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki are among the officials to be deposed.

Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on hate speech and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTracks contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

Read more:

Biden Upset Twitter Censorship Rules Will No Longer Benefit Him?

Florida adds more homophobic censorship laws to Dont Say Gay suite …

This is a recipe for chilling speech in public education, using the threat of punishment to pressure teachers into giving any potentially controversial topic a wide berth, said Jonathan Friedman, PEN Americas director of free expression and education programs.

The new rules require schools that offer gender-inclusive bathrooms and locker rooms to notify parents and outline their supervision procedures for these facilities. Though these guidelines dont outright ban schools from designating their bathrooms in any way different from biological sex, they undermine the U.S. Department of Educations recent guidance aimed at preventing discrimination against students based on things such as gender identity.

[The rule] essentially puts a target on the backs of trans kids, by notifying all of their parents about this, said Maxx Fenning, the founder and president of PRISM, an organization that works to expand access to LGBTQIA+-inclusive education and sexual health resources for youth in south Florida.

The issue of gender identity and bathrooms has been a longstanding and contentious one in Florida. In 2020, the 11th Circuit Court ruled that a Florida school boards refusal to allow a transgender boy to use the bathroom matching his gender identity was unconstitutional. In 2021, the school board asked a federal appeals court to again consider whether the student should have been allowed to use boys bathrooms. Oral arguments were heard in early 2022, and a decision is still pending. While the latest rules concerning bathrooms do not ban transgender students from using the facility that corresponds with their gender identity, advocates say it will only discriminate against transgender students and put them in harms way.

Unfortunately, the rule forces these school districts to put out these memos to parents letting them know, just an FYI, trans kids are going to be using the bathrooms that your kids are in, said Fenning. So it puts an uncomfortable target on the back of trans kids and singles them out in a way that is potentially really damaging.

A second rule includes an expansion of the Stop WOKE Act, also known as House Bill 7, by barring subjecting [students and employees] to training, instruction, or any other required activity that espouses, promotes, advances, inculcates, or compels any of the concepts related to their administrations definition of critical race theory.

A third rule offers specifications on House Bill 1467, which mandates that elementary school libraries post their educational and reading materials online and make them accessible for parents to search through. Friedman says this will force librarians to reconsider including books with LGBTQIA+ contenteliminating representation that has been crucial for LGBTQIA+ students.

These new rules continue an alarming pattern of censorship by intimidation in Florida schools, said Friedman. The new rules go beyond the provisions and language of what was passed into law this year, subjecting teachers and students to an all-encompassing regime of prohibitions and punishments. There seems to be little concern about how these provisions will stymie the work of teaching basic literacy, or in effect suppress information and ideas that many families and students want available in their public schools.

Any teacher who intentionally provide[s] classroom instruction to kindergarten through third-grade students on gender identity or sexual orientation will face revocation or suspension of the individual educators certificate, or the other penalties as provided by law. As it stands, the law gives parents the right to sue a school district if they suspect that the law has been violated. However, it is unclear how the laws will be enforced and what will constitute classroom instruction. Friedman posits that a teacher answering a students question related to the two topics would technically be considered a violation.

Each of the laws alone is problematic when you think about the purpose of education and open inquiry and freedom to learn, said Friedman. But in tandem, its especially pernicious, and the fact that violating the Dont Say Gay bill can result in teachers explicitly having their licenses revoked and suspendedif they werent already wary of running afoul of these laws, that will make them more so.

The vague, punitive, and extreme nature of the law, Friedman says, is what is driving teachers away from the classroom. As of 2021, Florida Education Association said there were nearly 9,000 teaching and staff vacancies. At the beginning of 2022, FEA said that the number had grown to nearly 10,800 total openings.

Schools ought to be welcoming places for students, Friedman said. It is my hope that teachers will not be bullied into never mentioning LGBTQIA+ people. Its my hope that teachers can continue to be there for their students and be supportive of them, and particularly at the high school level, be able to teach the truth about peoples identities and American history, but all of that appears to be at risk.

Prism is an independent and nonprofit newsroom led by journalists of color. Our in-depth and thought-provoking journalism reflects the lived experiences of people most impacted by injustice. We tell stories from the ground up to disrupt harmful narratives, and to inform movements for justice. Sign up for our newsletter to get our stories in your inbox, and follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.

Read the original:

Florida adds more homophobic censorship laws to Dont Say Gay suite ...

The Times view on free speech in universities: Tacit Censorship

Liam Neeson, the actor, is among those to have been considered too offensive to speak on a university campus

ANDER GILLENEA/GETTY IMAGES

It is difficult to pinpoint when the corrosive practice of banning speakers from campuses ceased to be reserved for genuinely inflammatory figures. In recent years, however, would-be censors have dramatically expanded the list of non-desirables. Amongst those recently considered to be too offensive were the comedian Harry Enfield and the actor Liam Neeson.

Concerns about free speech at British universities are not novel, but a new report suggests the problem is burgeoning. The Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) argues that a culture of fear has set in at British universities whereby students are so concerned by the potential backlash from a controversial debate or contentious speaker that they are simply giving up on these events entirely. They call it quiet no-platforming.

While the report notes

Read the original here:

The Times view on free speech in universities: Tacit Censorship

FBI Sued for Withholding Records of Facebook Censorship of Hunter Biden …

Amid mounting questions over an FBI warning that prompted Facebook to suppress a story about Hunter Bidens laptop, the federal agency now faces a lawsuit seeking to compel it to publicize conversations it had with the social media giant.

The lawsuit was filed Tuesday by America First Legal (AFL) at a Washington D.C. District Court. The non-profit group, founded by longtime Donald Trump adviser Stephen Miller, said Americans deserve to know what the FBI and the social media giant were up to as the November elections approached.

According to the complaint (pdf), the AFL requested in August that the FBI make public all of its communications with Facebook between Oct. 1, 2020, and Nov. 15, 2020. However, the FBI turned down that request, claiming that it was so overly broad that it couldnt be done with a reasonable amount of effort.

AFLs complaint said: Barely a month before the 2022 midterm election, FBI officials continue to suppress information of great interest to American voters and stonewall AFLs request for records relating to the FBIs collusive scheme with Facebook to censor news and information about the contents of Hunter Bidens laptop.

Facebook has drawn much scrutiny after Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, told popular podcast host Joe Rogan that the platform did algorithmically suppress a New York Post story on emails allegedly recovered from a laptop owned by then-presidential candidate Joe Bidens son. Those emails, according to the Post, showed a direct link Biden had with his sons dubious business dealings in China and Ukraine.

Zuckerberg said this apparent censorship only happened after the FBI approached Meta with warnings about Russian disinformation.

The background here is that the FBI came to ussome folks on our teamand was like, Hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically theres about to be some kind of dump thats similar to that,' he told Rogan in the Aug. 25 interview.

The FBI didnt specifically mention the laptop story, Zuckerberg said, but Facebook thought it fit that pattern the FBI described and decided to limit its reach.

Despite Zuckerbergs claims, the AFL insists that there was a comprehensive collusion between the FBI and Big Tech to censor and control critical information in an effort to put Joe Biden into the White House.

The evidence is that during the 2020 Presidential election campaign, the FBI conspired and combined with large corporations, including Facebook, to censor and suppress the damning evidence of Biden family corruption and influence peddling found on Hunter Bidens laptop, said AFL Senior Counselor Reed Rubinstein. This was done to help Joe Biden and the Democrats win the 2020 election.

Republican Sens. Chuck Grassley (Iowa) and Ron Johnson (Wis.) agreed. In their letters to Zuckerberg and FBI Director Chris Wray, the senators asked for names of the government and Facebook employees involved in those conversations about Russian disinformation.

The American people deserve to know whether the FBI used Facebook as part of their alleged plan to discredit information about Hunter Biden, the senators wrote.

Follow

Bill Pan is a reporter for The Epoch Times.

See the original post here:

FBI Sued for Withholding Records of Facebook Censorship of Hunter Biden ...

Trump Declares Return of the Silent Majority; New Censorship Attempt …

Former President Donald Trump declared on Truth Social that The silent majority is back. The question of a silent majority was raised in both the 2016 and 2020 elections as being essential to a potential Trump victory, under the allegation that censorship and social pressure are keeping his supporters silent.

Meanwhile, theres a large-scale movement underway of propaganda disguised as local news, big tech censorship tools that fine people for misinformation, and programs that allow for communal fact-checking. Yet many of these are facing a troubled launch, amid controversy and social pushback.

In this live Q&A with Crossroads host Joshua Philipp, well discuss these stories and others, and answer questions from the audience.

Subscribe to the new Crossroads newsletter and stay up-to-date!

*Big thanks to our sponsor Sekur! Use promo Code JOSHUA for 25% off at https://www.sekur.com

The Real Story of Jan. 6 Documentary102 Minutes, Color

The Real Story of Jan. 6, a documentary by The Epoch Times, reveals the truth that has been hidden from the American people. While a narrative has been set that what took place that day was an insurrection, key events and witnesses have been ignored, until now.

The Real Story DVD: https://www.epochtv.shop/product-page/dvd-the-real-story-of-january-6 , Promo Code Joshua for 20% off

* Click the Save button below the video to access it later on My List.

Donate to Support Crossroads: https://donorbox.org/crossroadsCrossroads merchandise: https://www.epochtv.shop

Follow Crossroads on social media:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Crossroads.JoshTwitter: https://twitter.com/crossroads_joshRumble: https://rumble.com/user/Crossroads_JoshuaPhilippTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@crossroads_josh

Gettr: https://www.gettr.com/user/crossroads_joshGab: https://gab.com/Crossroads_JoshTelegram: https://t.me/Crossroads_josh

See the rest here:

Trump Declares Return of the Silent Majority; New Censorship Attempt ...

What Is the Compelled Speech Doctrine Under the First Amendment? – The New York Times

  1. What Is the Compelled Speech Doctrine Under the First Amendment?  The New York Times
  2. Op-Ed: Elenis case asks the Supreme Court whether 1st Amendment protects discrimination  Los Angeles Times
  3. The First Amendment shouldnt trump human rights  The Emory Wheel
  4. The First Amendment Needs To Protect Everyone (Even Homophobic Web Designers) To Protect Anyone  Techdirt
  5. ACLU Now Sides With Government Against First Amendment Rights  Daily Signal
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

See the original post:

What Is the Compelled Speech Doctrine Under the First Amendment? - The New York Times