Bahamas Corrections Commissioner Says FTX Co-Founder Bankman-Fried Is …

According to local reports, former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) is in good spirits and is being kept in the maximum security unit in the sick bay. SBF is held in custody at the Bahamas Department of Correctional Services (BDOCS), a jail called Fox Hill that is known for being filthy, and was accused of prison maltreatment last year. Acting commissioner of The Bahamas Corrections, Doan Cleare, detailed that SBF is in a dorm-style cell with roughly five other inmates.

After living in luxury at Albany Place in Nassau, Bahamas, the FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) is now located in the maximum security unit at the Bahamas Department of Correctional Services (BDOCS). The prison doesnt have a great reputation and according to a New York Post report, the jail is maggot-infested and a hellhole of a penitentiary. The Post also details that SBFs family members have been attempting to get the former FTX executive vegan meals.

BDOCS is referred to as Fox Hill prison and it is also known for being overcrowded. There are numerous human rights reports littered all over the web about the prisons alleged maltreatment issues. The journalist Tiffany Fong tweeted that the U.S. State Department flagged Fox Hill prison for being infested with rats, maggots, and insects, and inmates removed human waste by bucket and developed bed sores from lying on the bare ground. Other reports reveal that Fox Hill is understaffed and some inmates are only allowed outside for 30 minutes a week.

Acting commissioner of The Bahamas Corrections, Doan Cleare, told thenassauguardian.com that SBF is being in the Fox Hill medical department. Cleare further disclosed that after the former FTX executive spent his first night in jail, he was in good spirits. Mr. Fried is housed in [the] Maximum Security Housing Unit in [the] sick bay, the commissioner told the reporter.

He is getting his medication on time, The Bahamas Corrections commissioner added. Only in-person lawyer visits [are permitted] at this time, along with personnel from the American Embassy. All others will be via video conferencing. He is with five other inmates in a dorm-style setting. SBF will be held in custody at Fox Hill until February 8th, 2023, if he isnt extradited to the U.S. first.

What do you think about the Bahamian prison SBF resides in until his next court hearing? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Read more:
Bahamas Corrections Commissioner Says FTX Co-Founder Bankman-Fried Is ...

Crypto Markets Analysis: Bitcoin Correlations Show Dollar Still Rules (in the Inverse) – CoinDesk

  1. Crypto Markets Analysis: Bitcoin Correlations Show Dollar Still Rules (in the Inverse)  CoinDesk
  2. $16K retest the most likely path for Bitcoin, according to 2 derivative metrics  Cointelegraph
  3. Bitcoin Is Back Below $17,000. Crypto Traders Can Use a Break.  Barron's

Originally posted here:
Crypto Markets Analysis: Bitcoin Correlations Show Dollar Still Rules (in the Inverse) - CoinDesk

Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

Wikimedia list article

This comparison only covers software licenses which have a linked Wikipedia article for details and which are approved by at least one of the following expert groups: the Free Software Foundation, the Open Source Initiative, the Debian Project and the Fedora Project. For a list of licenses not specifically intended for software, see List of free-content licences.

FOSS stands for "Free and Open Source Software". There is no one universally agreed-upon definition of FOSS software and various groups maintain approved lists of licenses. The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is one such organization keeping a list of open-source licenses.[1] The Free Software Foundation (FSF) maintains a list of what it considers free.[2] FSF's free software and OSI's open-source licenses together are called FOSS licenses. There are licenses accepted by the OSI which are not free as per the free software definition. The open source definition allows for further restrictions like price, type of contribution and origin of the contribution, e.g. the case of the NASA Open Source Agreement, which requires the code to be "original" work.[3][4] The OSI does not endorse FSF license analysis (interpretation) as per their disclaimer.[5]

The FSF's free Software definition focuses on the user's unrestricted rights to use a program, to study and modify it, to copy it, and redistribute it for any purpose, which are considered by the FSF the four essential freedoms.[6][7] The OSI's open-source criteria focuses on the availability of the source code and the advantages of an unrestricted and community driven development model.[8] Yet, many FOSS licenses, like the Apache License, and all Free Software licenses allow commercial use of FOSS components.[9]

For a simpler comparison across the most common licenses see free-software license comparison.

The following table compares various features of each license and is a general guide to the terms and conditions of each license, based on seven subjects or categories. Recent tools like the European Commissions' Joinup Licensing Assistant,[10] makes possible the licenses selection and comparison based on more than 40 subjects or categories, with access to their SPDX identifier and full text. The table below lists the permissions and limitations regarding the following subjects:

In this table, "permissive" means the software has minimal restrictions on how it can be used, modified, and redistributed, usually including a warranty disclaimer. "Copyleft" means the software requires that its source code be made publicly available and that all provisions in the license be preserved in derivative works.

Other licenses that don't have information:

This table lists for each license what organizations from the FOSS community have approved it be it as a "free software" or as an "open source" license , how those organizations categorize it, and the license compatibility between them for a combined or mixed derivative work. Organizations usually approve specific versions of software licenses. For instance, a FSF approval means that the Free Software Foundation (FSF) considers a license to be free-software license. The FSF recommends at least "Compatible with GPL" and preferably copyleft. The OSI recommends a mix of permissive and copyleft licenses, the Apache License 2.0, 2- & 3-clause BSD license, GPL, LGPL, MIT license, MPL 2.0, CDDL and EPL.

Read the original:
Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

Julian Assange supporters protest against US extradition in London, DC …

Hundreds of supporters of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange gathered in London and Washington, D.C., on Saturday to demand the U.S. government end its efforts to extradite him over the publication of classified documents.

Assange, who is currently being held at Londons high-security Belmarsh Prison, will face espionage charges if he is extradited to the U.S. He is accused of publishing information detailing crimes committed by the U.S. government in the Guantnamo Bay detention camp, Iraq and Afghanistan, and reveals instances in which the CIA engaged in torture and rendition.

Britain's High Court ruled over the summer that Assange can be extradited to the U.S.

Supporters in London on Saturday formed a human chain outside Britain's parliament that stretched from its perimeter railings and across nearby Westminster Bridge to the other side of the River Thames.

JULIAN ASSANGE EXTRADITION TO US APPROVED BY BRITISH GOVERNMENT

Assange, who is currently being held at Londons high-security Belmarsh Prison, will face espionage charges if he is extradited to the U.S. (FOX News Digital/Landon Mion)

Assange's wife Stella said the British government should speak to U.S authorities to stop the extradition attempts.

"It's already gone on for three and a half years. It is a stain on the United Kingdom and is a stain on the Biden administration," she said.

In the U.S., supporters of the Australian-born activist gathered outside the Justice Department to call on the federal government to drop its extradition bid. The protestors said they hope Assange never steps foot on U.S. soil and that he would not be treated fairly by the judicial system.

"Julian wasn't trying to help dictatorships, he was trying to stop the United States from becoming one! And that's why they want him in jail, and that is why it is crucial that we fight to set Julian free," 2020 Libertarian Vice Presidential candidate Spike Cohen said at the rally.

Human trafficking survivor Eliza Bleu urged the "global elites, the ruling class" and employees of the CIA and FBI to "be a hero, quit your job and become a whistleblower."

"If it's a choice between free speech and the United States government, trust and know, one's gotta go! If one has to go, it ain't gonna be free speech!" she said, adding that she is so passionate about freedom because she knows what it is like to lose it.

EXTRADITION OF WIKILEAKS FOUNDER JULIAN ASSANGE APPROVED BY UK JUDGE

Supporters of Assange gathered outside the Justice Department to call on the federal government to drop its extradition bid. (FOX News Digital/Landon Mion)

Bleu said that, despite being a female trafficking survivor, she skipped out on the Women's March that also took place on Saturday because, without a free press, there would be nobody to cover women's issues or survivor's issues.

Assange sought asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London years ago because he faced extradition to Sweden after two women accused him of rape. The investigations were eventually dropped.

Multiple speakers at the rally in D.C. railed against the corporate press for their lack of journalists at the event, particularly calling out The New York Times and The Guardian for being among the outlets to also publish the contents of the documents Assange had obtained.

"We need watchdog journalists not lapdog journalists," two-time Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein said.

In addition to publishing war logs leaked to him by former U.S. Army soldier Chelsea Manning, who was convicted in 2013 of violations of the Espionage Act and other offenses, Assange's site published internal communications taken from the Democratic National Committee and then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign that shed light on the DNC's attempts to boost Clinton in the 2016 Democratic primary.

Assange has been blamed for impacting Clinton's chances of winning the presidency in 2016.

The Wikileaks founder is wanted by U.S. authorities on 18 counts over the publication of classified documents.

Multiple speakers at the rally in D.C. railed against the corporate press for their lack of journalists at the event. (FOX News Digital/Landon Mion)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The U.S. has said that Assange put lives in danger with his publication of the documents but his supporters call him a political victim.

The CIA has reportedly previously had plans to kill Assange over the publication of sensitive CIA hacking tools, known as "Vault 7." The agency said it suffered "the largest data loss in CIA history" after Wikileaks published the materials.

According to a September 2021 Yahoo report, the CIA during the Trump era had discussions "at the highest levels" of the administration about plans to assassinate Assange in London. Following orders from then-CIA director Mike Pompeo, the agency had drawn up kill "sketches" and "options." The report further noted advanced plans to kidnap and rendition Assange and that the CIA made a political decision to charge him.

Assange's legal team has appealed Britain's High Court ruling to authorize his extradition.

Go here to see the original:
Julian Assange supporters protest against US extradition in London, DC ...

WordPress discussed deplatforming The New York Post after Hunter Biden …

The content of Hunter Bidens laptop was certainly scandalous enough, but the handling, i.e., censoring of the story about that by tech platforms influenced by political preference certainly gave it a run for its money.

Even by the standards of 2020, the year of censorship,TwitterandFacebooks decision to suppress the New York Post article just before the US presidential election that resulted in the victory of Hunters father, was highly unusual.

Facebook used potential misinformation policies to artificially limit the storys spread, whileTwitter went for outright censorshipby banning links to the Post page, saying it was enforcing hacked materials rules (which did not apply).

In early December, Twitter ownerElon Muskput this controversy back in the spotlight when he announced that to restore public trust in the social platform he recently acquired, internal documents detailing how the censorship decision was made would be released.

And now that people are once again talking about it, so is WordPress founder Matt Mullenweg,who this week revealedthat WordPress owner Automattic was also considering censoring the New York Post story since the media outlet used WordPress VIP as its content management system.

Although Mullenweg framed all this in an interview with The Verge as an example of the hardships of moderation, what the revelation really shows is the infrastructural depth of online speech restrictions, which is not limited to social media but also includes deeper layers, such as a CMS platform.

Automattic in the end managed to resist the urge to join Twitter and Facebook in, to all intents and purposes, trying to hide a legitimate and highly relevant news story from the public.

According to Mullenweg, the to censor or not to censor debate revolved around probing Automattics terms of service, to find out whether some of them could be interpreted to mean that Americas oldest news outlet had violated the rules.

We made a decision there to not touch it, he said, adding, The interpretation of the policies is really where I think the art and science of it is.

In other words, major online platforms like to have rules that are not really rules, but rather statements that can be interpreted whichever way best suits those platforms in any given case.

Read more:

WordPress discussed deplatforming The New York Post after Hunter Biden ...

artificial intelligence – Alan Turing and the beginning of AI

Theoretical work

The earliest substantial work in the field of artificial intelligence was done in the mid-20th century by the British logician and computer pioneer Alan Mathison Turing. In 1935 Turing described an abstract computing machine consisting of a limitless memory and a scanner that moves back and forth through the memory, symbol by symbol, reading what it finds and writing further symbols. The actions of the scanner are dictated by a program of instructions that also is stored in the memory in the form of symbols. This is Turings stored-program concept, and implicit in it is the possibility of the machine operating on, and so modifying or improving, its own program. Turings conception is now known simply as the universal Turing machine. All modern computers are in essence universal Turing machines.

During World War II, Turing was a leading cryptanalyst at the Government Code and Cypher School in Bletchley Park, Buckinghamshire, England. Turing could not turn to the project of building a stored-program electronic computing machine until the cessation of hostilities in Europe in 1945. Nevertheless, during the war he gave considerable thought to the issue of machine intelligence. One of Turings colleagues at Bletchley Park, Donald Michie (who later founded the Department of Machine Intelligence and Perception at the University of Edinburgh), later recalled that Turing often discussed how computers could learn from experience as well as solve new problems through the use of guiding principlesa process now known as heuristic problem solving.

Turing gave quite possibly the earliest public lecture (London, 1947) to mention computer intelligence, saying, What we want is a machine that can learn from experience, and that the possibility of letting the machine alter its own instructions provides the mechanism for this. In 1948 he introduced many of the central concepts of AI in a report entitled Intelligent Machinery. However, Turing did not publish this paper, and many of his ideas were later reinvented by others. For instance, one of Turings original ideas was to train a network of artificial neurons to perform specific tasks, an approach described in the section Connectionism.

At Bletchley Park, Turing illustrated his ideas on machine intelligence by reference to chessa useful source of challenging and clearly defined problems against which proposed methods for problem solving could be tested. In principle, a chess-playing computer could play by searching exhaustively through all the available moves, but in practice this is impossible because it would involve examining an astronomically large number of moves. Heuristics are necessary to guide a narrower, more discriminative search. Although Turing experimented with designing chess programs, he had to content himself with theory in the absence of a computer to run his chess program. The first true AI programs had to await the arrival of stored-program electronic digital computers.

In 1945 Turing predicted that computers would one day play very good chess, and just over 50 years later, in 1997, Deep Blue, a chess computer built by the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), beat the reigning world champion, Garry Kasparov, in a six-game match. While Turings prediction came true, his expectation that chess programming would contribute to the understanding of how human beings think did not. The huge improvement in computer chess since Turings day is attributable to advances in computer engineering rather than advances in AIDeep Blues 256 parallel processors enabled it to examine 200 million possible moves per second and to look ahead as many as 14 turns of play. Many agree with Noam Chomsky, a linguist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), who opined that a computer beating a grandmaster at chess is about as interesting as a bulldozer winning an Olympic weightlifting competition.

More:
artificial intelligence - Alan Turing and the beginning of AI

Alto Neuroscience Presents New Data Leveraging EEG and Machine Learning to Predict Individual Response to Antidepressants at the 61st Annual Meeting…

Alto Neuroscience Presents New Data Leveraging EEG and Machine Learning to Predict Individual Response to Antidepressants at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology  Business Wire

More here:
Alto Neuroscience Presents New Data Leveraging EEG and Machine Learning to Predict Individual Response to Antidepressants at the 61st Annual Meeting...

Genomic Testing Cooperative to Present Data at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on New Applications of its Proprietary Tests that Combine…

Genomic Testing Cooperative to Present Data at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on New Applications of its Proprietary Tests that Combine Transcriptome Data Obtained from Tissue or Liquid Biopsies with Machine Learning  Business Wire

Read more from the original source:
Genomic Testing Cooperative to Present Data at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on New Applications of its Proprietary Tests that Combine...

Apple has released a Set of Optimizations that allow the Stable Diffusion AI Image Generator to be used on Apple Silicon, making use of Core ML,…

Apple has released a Set of Optimizations that allow the Stable Diffusion AI Image Generator to be used on Apple Silicon, making use of Core ML, Apple's Exclusive Platform for Machine Learning Models  MarkTechPost

Read more:
Apple has released a Set of Optimizations that allow the Stable Diffusion AI Image Generator to be used on Apple Silicon, making use of Core ML,...