This Bitcoin fractal predicted the fall, but here’s the next price target – AMBCrypto News

Bitcoin, along with the larger crypto-market, dropped the ball after the most recent price fall had echoes of 19 Mays crash. With BTC shedding 25% of its value in a matter of a few hours, the market seemed to reset to its September-end levels. While it was trading around the $49k-mark at press time, for a brief moment, it did tread close to $42,000 too.

The aforementioned price fall led to a mass wipeout, giving way to over $2.5 billion liquidations across the market. Ergo, the question Does the macro bullish outlook for Bitcoin remain intact?

On the daily chart, Bitcoins price had been in a falling wedge structure since the 16 November crash. Looking at the larger structure for the past month, it can be argued that the latest crash to the $42k level was overdue.

On zooming out, a look at BTCs weekly chart highlighted how after the 4 December crash, the price broke the MA 50 trend-line.

During the previous major corrections too, the price had broken below this level in May and then again, in late June. However, it has always managed to hold it.

In fact, this level has acted as a support for the +100% rally from July to November. Thus, as long as the weekly closes above or at least around the 1W MA50, BTCUSD has a legitimate probability of forming support there and starting a new rally.

Interestingly, an RSI fractal seemed also to be in play here. As noted in the chart above, a similar RSI structure was seen from mid-2019 to early 2020, as seen from early 2021 to the time of writing. The key catalyst in both cases was the sell-off due to COVID fears.

However, this crash was more of a combination of multiple factors like the panic among retail investors, tech market crash, over-leveraged crypto-markets, high Open Interest, positive funding rate, and so on.

For now, while the price has rebounded, another fall to the lower $40k-level cannot be discarded.

However, BTCs two main utility indicators continue to rise A good signal. BTCs token circulation and its daily active addresses, at press time, sat at a 6-month high. In fact, they seemed likely to continue their uptrend too.

Furthermore, the estimated leverage ratio dropped by 22% in just one day. This was last seen in September when the price dropped by 24% and touched $40k.

In case a similar rally follows and BTCs price makes a similar structure, the next minimum target of $75k for Bitcoin towards the end of January 2022 can be expected.

At the time of writing, the biggest takeaway as BTCs price rebounded from its lower levels seemed to be that the market dynamics have been looking very different than previous cycles.

Even though volatility was still high, the market seemed to move from FOMO-induced price tops and sell-offs to more mature and sustainable growth while flushing leverage. Nonetheless, with the price structure still tilting towards bearish, despite the bounce, it would be best to be cautious.

Originally posted here:
This Bitcoin fractal predicted the fall, but here's the next price target - AMBCrypto News

Best Stocks, Crypto, and ETFs to Watch – Bitcoin, GameStop, Costco and SPY in Focus – FX Empire

Bitcoin got smashed over the weekend, dropping to a two-month low under 42,000 before bouncing above 49,000 ahead of the new trading week. The selloff follows de-risking in other volatile assets, along with a flight to safety, as traders and investors speculate on fallout from the Omicron variant. The senior cryptocurrency failed a breakout above the April peak near 65,000 in November, with selling pressure since that time raising odds for a long-term double top reversal.

Speaking of de-risking, 2020 meme monster GameStop Inc. (GME) reports Q3 2021 earnings after Wednesdays closing bell, with analysts looking for a loss of $0.52 per-share on $1.29 billion in revenue. If met, earnings-per-share (EPS) will mark a slight improvement compared to the $0.53 loss in the same quarter last year. The options market could go ballistic ahead of the report, with the most aggressive bearish bets of 2021, fueled by last weeks 23% decline in meme cousin AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. (AMC).

Costco Wholesale Corp. (COST) has defied gravity through most of 2021, posting a 40% year-to-date return. However, big box rivals Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Target Corp. (TGT) have been under active distribution for weeks, raising odds for an aggressive sell-the-news reaction after COST reports fiscal Q1 2022 earnings on Thursday evening. Technical readings are deteriorating into the news, with weekly relative strength indicators nearing a potent sell signal.

SPDR S&P 500 Trust (SPY) reached short-term support at the 50-day moving average and breakout above the September high at 454 in Wednesdays session. The fund bounced on Thursday but relinquished the majority of those gains on Friday, raising odds for a breakdown that could unfold as early as Sundays overnight session. That violation may signal additional downside into the 200-day moving average at 428, which has narrowly aligned with the October swing low.

Tesla Inc. (TSLA) had a bad week as well, dropping more than 6%, as investors dumped high growth stocks in favor of defensive plays. The selloff also marked a delayed reaction to a bearish Monday Tweet by CEO Elon Musk, in which he reiterated supply chain issues and warned I will provide an updated product roadmap on next earnings call. The decline has the potential to complete an Adam and Eve double top, with critical support just below the psychological 1,000 level.

Catch up on the latest price action with our new ETF performance breakdown.

Disclosure: the author held no positions in aforementioned securities at the time of publication.

See the original post:
Best Stocks, Crypto, and ETFs to Watch - Bitcoin, GameStop, Costco and SPY in Focus - FX Empire

The Case of Tennis Star Peng Shuai Reveals the Real Purpose of China’s Censorship – WIRED

When civic spaces are closed and groups deleted, individuals with few or no connections outside of social media have backlogs of resources and connections taken away. In the case of WeChat specificallywhich users in China utilize for chats, payments, blog publishing, travel, and other digital record keepinga suspension or ban cuts a user off from many everyday communication and life tools.

This is not about topics. This censorship is fundamentally about the dismantling of social resources. Content takedowns not only address the shorter-term problem of text or images that government actors want to remove, they also weaken activists' ability to rebuild by isolating them and dampening their ability to create new resources. Censors can ensure that these groups stay silent. Conceptualizing censorship in a solely piecemeal way neglects the damage that destroying the foundations of organizing and civic society components can do.

Chinese censors have not operated using content- or keyword-only censorship for nearly a decade, finding early on that the social nature of social media was key to modernizing and maintaining Chinas Great Firewall. Xi Jinping himself characterized cyberspace in a 2016 speech as a spiritual garden for information innovation and cybersecurity. He claimed that this conceptual garden has a clear sky, and crisp air with a good ecology in cyberspace conforms to the peoples interests. A pestilent atmosphere with a deteriorating ecology in cyberspace, in turn, does not conform to the peoples interests. Unsaid but key to his analogy was what, and who, would have to be pruned and removed.

Communist Party internal literature also acknowledges the power of digital social networks beyond banning specific keywords. In preliminary studies of community environments on Weibo that led to increased control over social influencers, researchers identified the environment as a new frontier in civic spaces. Party scholars wrote: Because cyberspace has no systemic barriers or binding ideological constraints different classes, areas, and types of media can exchange, integrate, or confront ideas, making the public opinion environment increasingly complex.

Topic-based bans do remain an integral part of censorship, barring mention of historically taboo events like the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre and content published by banned media outlets like The New York Times, Washington Post, and BBC. However, after the rise of bloggers and social media influencers in the late 00s, the public opinion environment was also precisely targeted by campaigns meant to curtail influencer impact and the capacity of nongovernment thought leaders to build community.

In theory, social media users with large followings were private citizens. However, the mid-2010s handed them a choice: They could serve and support the politics of Chinese authorities, or they could face discipline by law enforcement and the dismantling of their communities. In 2013, amidst a flurry of blogger crackdowns, novelist Hao Qun summarized the trend aptly: They want to sever those relationships and make the relationship on Weibo atomized, just like relations in Chinese society, where everyone is just a solitary atom.

By the time Peng appeared in a November 2021 video call with IOC chair Thomas Bach, the Weibo and WeChat environments had virtually purged discussions with offending keywords or references to an earlier, clumsier cover-up email sent to the Womens Tennis Association.

Visit link:

The Case of Tennis Star Peng Shuai Reveals the Real Purpose of China's Censorship - WIRED

Opinion | Censoring books is another form of minority erasure – UI The Daily Iowan

Conservative efforts to censor books is a form of erasing minority identities.

I remember in high school my mom angrily talking on the phone about the book The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie being challenged in school. She expressed how, because of it, kids finally finally had an engaging book that explored situations relatable to marginalized identities.

I didnt pay much attention to her argument at the time, but nowthat the same discussions about censorship are arising today, I realize how this is another attempt to erase minority identities to preserve white supremacist narratives.

Iowa Sen. Jake Chapman, R-Adel, announced he is working toward legislation that would attach felony charges to teachers using books conservatives deem unsuitable because of Iowas obscenity laws.

Some examples include The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian and The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas. Its ironic that conservatives are pushing for this censorship when a lot of their agenda is centered around hands-off government and freedom of speech.

These are award-winning books that highlight experiences and environmentsin which students live and grow up. According to the Iowa American Civil Liberties Union,The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian was originally challenged in 2015 due to abrasive language and references to masturbation.

Both of these things are normal aspects of teenage experiences. In reality, conservatives are using this as a scapegoat to censor a book that highlights an example of minority experience in America.

Two parents in the Johnston County Community School District complained about The Hate U Give due to its anti-police rhetoric, though the school board eventually voted to keep the book.

Beyond touching on the reality Black people face when it comes to policing and the justice system, this book validates the experience of Black kids growing up in impoverished neighborhoods and experiencing systemic racism.

The Ankeny Community School District was also under fire from parents complaining about books regarding LGBTQ experiences. The two books they focused on were All Boys Arent Blue by George M. Johnson and Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe. All Boys Arent Blue discusses the experience of being Black and queer growing up. Its important for students to be exposed to material that includes the intersectionality of different identities and how that influences experience.

I doubt it is a coincidence that all these books revolve around marginalized identities.

Who is this censorship for when these books involve themes that apply to the real lives of many students? Banning students from engaging in difficult material that reflects real experiences is not protection, it is censorship that allows us to turn a blind eye on systemic issues in our country.

In addition to these books doing valuable work to showcase minority experiences, Todd Petty, a University of Iowa Law professor, said isolated incidences of sexual references do not make a book obscene. Petty also cited how The First Amendment protects books from being banned due to obscenity laws if they have literary merit, which all the aforementioned books clearlydo, as theyve received major literary awards.

If we were focused on protecting our students, we wouldpay attention to real threats to their well-being. For example, taking the necessary measures to prevent school shootings, prioritizing closing the achievement gap between white and Black students, and investing in infrastructure in impoverished communities.

Instead, Chapman is focused on preserving the erasure of underrepresented communities in books.

Columns reflect the opinions of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Editorial Board, The Daily Iowan, or other organizations in which the author may be involved.

Continued here:

Opinion | Censoring books is another form of minority erasure - UI The Daily Iowan

His View: Understanding disinformation, censorship on the internet – Moscow-Pullman Daily News

One of the more pathologically fascinating parts of the current pandemic is the hue and cry in the mainstream media over disinformation. Why is it fascinating? Because mostly this label is used to attack people whose beliefs dont line up with your own. But then if one protests about that belief, a straw man is inevitably hauled out saying you also must want unrestricted pedophilia, or other societally objectionable material, to be propagated.

Let me give a little insight into how all this works and why making a decision to censor views on any of the social media platforms is actually a huge deal, not simple, and absolutely not in the interest of a free society.

Lets start with the universally objectionable content terrible crimes against individuals and children. Though this is a changing landscape with advances in artificial intelligence, most of this type of content moderation is done overseas in countries like the Philippines. Wired magazine has written about it, and the effects on the minds of the censors is tragic, and often ruinous for peoples lives. Watching terrible sexual crimes and beheadings on loops creates trauma for the censors, and anyone who signs up can only watch so much before they are forced to quit.

Others are paying for your clean feed, and while Im not advocating for a change here, the least we can do is realize that people far away are paying for our own ability to use social media modestly shock-free.

The label for political and scientific disinformation is far less clear-cut. Many issues in play in the public are not clearly resolved, or can only be resolved over time. Eighteen months ago, if you had asked me do masks work? I would have said potentially. But the data came in, and I changed my mind. For voicing that opinion, I was accused of disinformation locally. Now that the various randomized controlled trial papers have, or are about to be, published, its becoming increasingly clear that I was right masks dont work. And finally, more and more experts are lining up behind my position. Disinformation indeed.

Often, fights in our own media are spurred on by forces the majority of people in our own country have no idea even exists. The whole lockdown paradigm for COVID-19 had never been attempted in public health until the recent COVID-19 crisis.

Yet communist China championed this early on, and it fit into the brains of control-oriented leadership across the world. Local advocates and government officials sprung up, and many countries followed this path.

But if you think that the responsibility for these disastrous policies, many that continue today, is totally on our elected leadership, youre wrong. Ever heard of the 50 Cent Party? Funded by the Chinese Communist Party, they constantly flood social media with support for extremely repressive COVID-19 policy in posts numbering almost a half a billion.

Why no extensive coverage of the likely source of COVID-19 as coming from a lab leak from the Wuhan lab? Media voices investigating this on Youtube and other channels attempting to get the word out get flooded by complaints by members of the 50 Cent Party for sexual content, when there is none. This causes Youtube to pull the counter-narrative against the CCP and its responsibility for COVID-19.

There is no reservoir in Youtube of absolute truth that is used to make censorship decisions. Instead, it is a true information war. And just because we as a country are unaware of most of it, doesnt mean it has no effect. For those interested in all this, go to Wikipedia and look up Little Pink.

Everyone can agree that there has to be some content moderation on social media. But we can at least be aware that it comes at a price, and absolutely should not be used against people debating the current issues of the day. Because just because you cant see those political forces dont mean they arent in play.

Pezeshki is a professor in mechanicaland materials engineering at WashingtonState University.

Read the original:

His View: Understanding disinformation, censorship on the internet - Moscow-Pullman Daily News

Thereve Been More Than 155 Book Challenges Since June: This Weeks Censorship News, December 3… – Book Riot

This week, the American Library Association (ALA) finally released a statement about the uptick in book challenges across the country. In it, they not only note the fact most of the challenges are coming for books by and about people of the global majority, as well as queer people, but they quantify wha theyve documented: 155 unique censorship incidents since June 1. The number is low, and given that these are ones either submitted to the ALAs Office of Intellectual Freedom (OIF) or ones that the OIF documents, its not a stretch to say its probably twice that number, if not more. Because so many of these happen on a very local level, they arent always reported, and even when they are, they may only be a line or two in a short news report about something else. That number also doesnt include any of the quiet or soft censorship which happens.

Whats maybe most noteworthy, though, in the statement is that theres no note on action. The OIF offers direct support and consultation to those who seek out their services during a challenge 120 of the 155 documented cases since June have had their help but theres no actionable steps laid out for what can be done without their intervention. What can an average citizen do? What can an average librarian or school board member or educator do? Actionable steps are essential to include here, especially as the ALA makes nice, sharable graphics with the information from the statement. Sharing this information on social media is great; sharing this information on social media doesnt put an end to the challenges nor offer anyone the opportunity to do something beyond report cases to the OIF. Thats a step, and a good one, but its not going to do anything as extremists show up at schools and libraries.

Were well beyond the point of depending on one organization to do all of the work and for all of that work to happen outside the public eye. More needs to be done externally thats actionable. Awareness campaigns like Banned Books Week arent enough. Groups like Moms for Liberty, along with other national and local right-wing groups, have their talking points down (see: obscenity, pornography, and other similar words being used in every single challenge), have their targets selected (critical race theory, social emotional learning, and specific book titles that have shown up again and again), and deploy their tactics in ways that are wide open (show up to school board meetings, read passages, make signs, run for local boards). There is a lot of money and energy behind these groups.

Change happens when we unite and take action, and its well beyond time for more than numbers and words. Book challenges will continue through the rest of 2021 most will be overlooked or not highlighted because its a ripe time to take a break from bad news but theyre going to amp up even more in the new year. Heres to hoping ALA and other organizations with power behind them use that to equip as many people as possible with the language, the actions, and the means to stand up against censorship. More, knowing what the groups behind these united movements are and having ready access to what it is theyre doing or taking aim at would put tremendous power into the hands of every person invested in protecting First Amendment rights. An organization like ALA, tasked with being a professional leader for information professionals has the capacity to not just advocate behind the scenes for intellectual freedom and information dissemination; they can be leaders in ensuring that anyone invested in the same principles has quick, accurate, and sound information about the people and groups working in opposition to those values.

Of course, you dont have to wait for an organization to offer that. There are tons of ways you can put in effort to protect intellectual freedom, whether its a few minutes or a few hours. Our toolkit for how to fight book bans and challenges can get you started.

Today In Books Newsletter

Sign up to Today In Books to receive daily news and miscellany from the world of books.

Thank you for signing up! Keep an eye on your inbox.

Heres a look at this week in book censorship news. There are some positive updates, along with a slew of stories that offer less hopeful resolutions.

Lets end this on a really positive note: a library in small town Pennsylvania had their funding cut when library commissioners (AKA the board) learned that an LGBTQ+ group met in one of the librarys meeting rooms. The community responded to this by raising tens of thousands of dollars for the library far more than the budget that was cut.

At the end of the day, the people who are loudest are the ones who get the biggest news stories. But its clear that they dont speak on behalf of the majority.

Read the original:

Thereve Been More Than 155 Book Challenges Since June: This Weeks Censorship News, December 3... - Book Riot

How 9 books started a fight over censorship and pornography in this Utah school district – Salt Lake Tribune

A list of nine books has started a bitter battle in a Utah school district over pornography and censorship and who can control what students read.

The latest culture confrontation began about a month ago, when a mom first emailed administrators at Canyons School District about the titles that she found concerning. She had heard about them on social media and discovered they were in the high school libraries in her districts suburbs at the south end of Salt Lake County.

There are many more but it is exhausting, mentally, watching and reviewing these books content, she wrote in a letter that has since been shared widely online by conservative groups.

Most of the books she listed focus on race and the LGBTQ community, including The Bluest Eye by Nobel Prize winner Toni Morrison and Gender Queer, a graphic novel about the authors journey of self-identity that has been at the center of the growing movement over banning books in school districts across the country.

The mom copied on her email a member of Utah Parents United, the group that has led efforts against masking in schools and in favor of dropping a social-emotional learning program, also at Canyons, because it linked to a site about sex.

And from there, debate over the books erupted.

Canyons spokesman Jeff Haney said the district has received hundreds of emails about the books and from parents who want to add more to the list for being too explicit. Utah Parents United has also since released an hourlong video encouraging its members to call their local police departments when they come across materials like this at their school libraries.

Pushing back against them is a growing list of advocates. Librarians and civil rights attorneys who support keeping the books on library shelves say this conflict is about limiting what viewpoints students can seek out on their own with a library card, especially diverse viewpoints from historically marginalized groups. None of the titles, they stress, are required reading.

Richard Price, an associate professor of political science at Weber State who tracks censorship in school districts, said: If you dont want to look at it, then you dont have to check it out. But I fear what this group is trying to do is forbid all people from reading them. Theyre trying to parent for all parents.

In response to the crossfire, the district has decided to temporarily pull the original nine titles from library shelves until it can further review them and its own policy for handling challenges.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Four of nine books that have been removed from schools in the Canyons School District and placed under review, Nov. 23, 2021. The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison, Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe, Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov and Beyond Magenta by Susan Kuklin.

UNDER REVIEW

The books under review in the Canyons School District are:

The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison, about an 11-year-old Black girl growing up in Ohio that includes scenes about racism and molestation.

Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe, which has drawn particular attention for its cartoon drawing of oral sex, but it also covers the confusion around young crushes and being yourself in society.

Beyond Magenta by Susan Kuklin, a nonfiction book based on interviews with six transgender and gender neutral young adults.

l8r, g8r by Lauren Myracle, the third book in a series written in instant messages about three friends navigating high school. Parents have protested this novel because it includes drug use and an inappropriately flirtatious teacher.

Lawn Boy by Jonathan Evison, about a young Mexican American boy examining what it means to be Brown in this country.

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov, which is the only traditionally classic novel on the list and tells the story of a professors pedophiliac relationship with a 12-year-old girl.

Mondays Not Coming by Tiffany Jackson, which is a fictional story about a Black girl who goes missing and whose disappearance is dismissed as just another runaway. The book delves into racism, mental illness, friendship and consent, received the Coretta Scott King-John Steptoe Award for New Talent.

The Opposite of Innocent by Sonya Sones, a story about a teenage girl with a crush on one of her parents male friends.

Out of Darkness by Ashley Hope Prez, about the relationship between a young Mexican American girl and a Black teenage boy in 1930s Texas.

The mom stood at the podium and turned to page 200 in the book. She began to read aloud.

The excerpt started with one character telling another: Get your hand off my butt. From there, it gets more explicit, detailing an older cousin molesting a younger boy.

The mom, Jessica Anderson, told the school board for Canyons District that she found the book at Alta High School in Sandy. This book should have never been available to any student, she added during the board meeting on Nov. 8.

One board member urged her to stop reading. Another, Mont Millerberg, shook his head and thanked Anderson for bringing it to their attention. He added: My question is not if those should be taken out or not thats intuitive. My question is, How the hell did they get in there in the first place?

Anderson was reading from a book, All Boys Arent Blue by LGBTQ activist George M. Johnson, which she and others with Utah Parents United are calling to be added to the list of titles to be pulled. They say every book in the district needs to be reviewed for sexual content.

The current policies and practices are not working, Anderson said.

Many of the books in Canyons School Districts libraries are not directly reviewed by school librarians who place them on the shelves. Some are given to the district for free, for instance, and placed in the collection without any more formal process. Thats typical in most schools.

But the districts current written policy, approved mostly recently in May 2020, only allows someone with a direct tie to a school a student who attends there, a parent of a child who attends there, or an employee who works there to raise concerns about a book in that specific schools library. The mom who sent the first email has students in middle and elementary school in Canyons; the books she raised alarms about are in four high schools in the district: Alta, Brighton, Corner Canyon and Jordan.

Haney said if someone objecting to a book doesnt fit the criteria in the policy, then the districts board is instructed to respond with silence and ignore the complaint.

The board, which leans conservative and represents a more right-learning area of the county, has decided that approach doesnt work, after hearing Anderson read the explicit paragraphs. It is now redrafting the policy to be broader and allow for anyone to bring up concerns that will be heard by the full board.

Haney said a committee has already met twice to work on revisions. A new draft is expected to come before the board next week at its regular Tuesday meeting.

During that discussion, a staff member talked about how the initial changes would create a process for any patron to raise concerns about a book and for librarians to more carefully comb through books coming in, based on criteria around age-appropriateness.

Those who oppose removing the books note that the policy does still state that titles are supposed to remain in use during the challenge process until a committee can read them and decide if they are appropriate for students.

They argue that Canyons violated that by taking the books away from students before that plays out. The ACLU of Utah has called it a reminder [that] constitutional protections cannot be simply ignored.

A joint statement from the Utah Educational Library Media Association, Utah Library Association and Utah Library Media Supervisors said due process must be followed to protect the First Amendment and all students rights to access diverse literature.

The states largest teachers union has joined them, as has the National Coalition Against Censorship. Several other national groups are signing on, too, including the Authors Guild, the National Council of Teachers of English and PEN America. Each has written a letter to Canyons District, urging that the books be returned.

Even Republican Utah Gov. Spencer Cox cautioned against a knee-jerk reaction during his November news conference.

Im not saying every book should be in every classroom, the governor said. But lets be thoughtful about it. Lets take a step back, take a deep breath and make sure that were not doing something well regret. Any student of history knows that banning books never ends up well.

State Sen. Kathleen Riebe, D-Cottonwood Heights, is considering running a bill in the upcoming legislative session that would require all public K-12 school districts and charters to follow a set process to review books under challenge before removing them from libraries.

Without set criteria, she and others worry that schools and school districts could easily throw out any material considered controversial by one parent; that one obscenity or one sex scene taken out of context could get a book tossed.

Libraries aim to expand readers perspectives, including providing books on subjects outside their comfort zones, and an interested patron should be able to access such titles, book defenders say.

When people can learn these things and read books, you can be so much kinder and compassionate and see outside of your bubble, said Wanda Mae Huffaker, a librarian with the Salt Lake County library system.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Salt Lake County Library System Librarian Wanda Mae Huffaker, Nov. 23, 2021.

Huffaker has studied intellectual freedom and defended books against being censored in Utah schools. When Davis School District pulled the book In Our Mothers House, about lesbian moms, from its shelves in 2012, she helped get it returned. And the district was required to pay out legal fees and agree in a settlement to never remove a book again based solely on its LGBTQ content.

Huffaker also notes that curriculum what students must learn in the classroom is different and separate from content in libraries, and she asserts they cannot be held to the same standards.

The book that is causing the most division on the list of nine titles in Canyons School District is Gender Queer considered the top banned book in the country right now.

Huffaker says its currently available in Salt Lake Countys public libraries, where its also been challenged but remains on shelves.

When I read that one, I thought I dont understand what that feels like because Ive never been there, she said. And it made me appreciate so much and to relate to that. It opened my eyes. Thats what literature does.

Huffaker, who is 64, said she recalls a little girl who frequently came into the Tyler Branch in Midvale where she works. One day, the librarian asked her how many brothers and sisters she had. The girl struggled.

She said she had two brothers, two sisters and one sibling that was both a boy and a girl. Huffaker said that experience, shortly before reading Gender Queer, also opened her eyes. And now she asks a more gender neutral question about siblings.

She worries what message removing the book sends to students like that or students who are LGBTQ and looking for a book that shows their experience. She believes those opposed to it are turning only to the controversial pages of the graphic novel, which does include some graphic depictions, and not considering the book as a whole.

Troy Williams, executive director for Equality Utah, added: This is about censorship. And it is immoral to try to deprive minority students in Utah from their culture and the voices that reflect their lives.

After the book was banned in Texas, author Maia Kobabe told The Texas Tribune: I also want to have the best interest of young people at heart. There are queer youth at every high school and those students, thats [who] Im thinking about, is the queer student who is getting left behind.

Utah Parents United, though, insists that the group is not trying to eradicate books about the gay community. They say their target is explicit sexual content. They call it pornography both written and drawn in the form of the cartoons in Gender Queer.

When asked for comment, the group said, this is our statement, and shared tens of images from each of the books on its list, showing excerpts of explicit scenes, pages detailing the use of condoms and lubricants, sexual positions, and one encouraging masturbation. Others were screenshots of rape scenes.

Its just so shocking, said Brooke Stephens, the curriculum director for Utah Parents United. I think Gender Queer needs to get out now.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe is one of nine books that have been removed from schools in the Canyons School District and placed under review, Nov. 23, 2021.

She said the scene in the graphic novel where the main character is forced to perform oral sex on another man is beyond inappropriate for high schoolers, with those as young as 14 years old being able to check it out in Canyons School District.

This isnt about the left or right deciding no Dr. Seuss or no Tom Sawyer, Stephens added. Its not about debatable books. Its about explicit porn.

But Price, the professor studying censorship at Weber State, who is nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns, said its not about porn.

The examples of sex in the books on the list, including Gender Queer, arent about titillation, Price said. Theyre about relationship imbalances and manipulation often real experiences from the authors that are meant to show the reader how the situation is wrong and warn them if theyre going through something similar.

Its about figuring our where your boundaries are and drawing them. Thats very healthy, Price said.

Amanda Darrow, the director of youth, family and education at the Utah Pride Center, said thats especially important in a conservative state where it can be difficult to be LGBTQ or talk openly about it.

Emma Houston, who works on diversity issues at the University of Utah, also worries that the targeted books are largely about experiences of race. Of the nine books, six directly address racism.

Its saying that were removing your lived experience. Its saying that individuals who look like you are not valued, said Houston, special assistant to the U.s vice president of equity, diversity and inclusion.

Shes particularly concerned about Toni Morrison novels being removed. Morrison, an award-winning author, wrote about what it means to be Black.

Utah Parents United say they object to The Bluest Eye, though, because of a rape scene; and Stephens points to her four adopted children, who are all Black and attend Davis School District (where there have been severe cases of racism reported) as a way to say that, to her, its not about race.

She says, though, that she believes parents should individually talk about race issues with their children. For instance, she does not support discussion of critical race theory which academics define as the history of race and slavery as a founding principle of America in the classroom. There is no evidence its being taught in K-12 schools in Utah.

But Houston says that should absolutely be allowed in books in the library. And, she added, the rape in The Bluest Eye is obviously brutal, but its a piece that cant be overlooked. Its part of the whole book as much as its part of a system that doesnt help people of color when they experience assault, she said.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison is one of nine books that have been removed from schools in the Canyons School District and placed under review, Nov. 23, 2021.

She also worries whats next. Will Asian writers be removed? Hispanic authors? Will students only see one perspective about being white? Houston doesnt support the books being removed, but if they are, she would like to see each book by an author of color replaced by another, to keep a diverse collection in school libraries.

In a statement, thee NAACP of Salt Lake backed the review and said it believes all material should be age-appropriate.

It is not about the titles but the contents within these books that the NAACP is concerned about through these book challenges, said President Jeanetta Williams in a statement. The NAACP would like to see the process play out.

Price said it would be unfair to ignore that the challenges from the books are also largely coming from straight white women, the professor believes. Price noted thats been a trend across the country, where book ban challenges are popping up largely in white suburbs that have been starting to become more diverse. That includes where Canyons School District sits in Salt Lake County.

Utah Parents United is organizing to review books in every district in the state. And Stephens has started a Facebook page where parents can report titles to her that they find concerning. Its everywhere, Stephens said. I dont think people know whats inside these books.

A parent in Washington County School District in Southern Utah sent a list of five titles to administrators there that she took issue with being in elementary schools. Those include Julin is a Mermaid, which is a picture book about a boy who wants to become a mermaid, as well as The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas. That books deals with racism and police brutality, and the parent said she objects to the profanities in it.

Washington County School District spokesman Steven Dunham said the district is following a set process to review the books, with a committee that is expected to read all of each one.

He said districts should balance whats age appropriate with providing diverse titles that represent all kids.

I also think its interesting how parents are challenging these books in our libraries, he added. This is the place that they think their children are going to be corrupted. But they are also giving them phones where they can look up anything.

The school board is expected to weigh in on the titles in January.

Haney, the Canyons spokesman, said the district there also cares about making sure titles are representative. He did a search of the library system in the district and found 102 titles with the keyword transgender, 44 with queer and 31 with LGBTQ.

But now some parents are asking for a full catalog of every book so they can review whats available.

Possible solutions are just as debated. Allowing parents to block books on a students account wont stop them from looking at the same titles if their peers check them out, Stephens said.

And putting them in a separate office to check out is othering, Darrow with the Utah Pride Center added. Some students might also not want their parents to know what theyre reading, as it could reveal their identity, Darrow said.

This latest effort to ban books is the broadest and most organized Huffaker has ever seen, she said, and to her, seeing it play out feels like a campaign out of George Orwells 1984.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Lily Aguilar, 10, reads in the Children's Section of the Ruth Vine Tyler Library, Nov. 23, 2021.

See the rest here:

How 9 books started a fight over censorship and pornography in this Utah school district - Salt Lake Tribune

A new variant, censorship accusations, Utah’s redlining consequences and more on ‘Behind the Headlines’ – Salt Lake Tribune

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Salt Lake County Library System Librarian Wanda Mae Huffaker holds four of nine books that have been removed from schools in the Canyons School District and placed under review, Nov. 23, 2021.

| Dec. 2, 2021, 8:54 p.m.

Nine books are removed from libraries in one school district prompting accusations of censorship. Scientists work to better understand the omicron variant of the coronavirus, and to better predict its impacts on the pandemic. And a look at how discriminatory housing practices from Utahs past carry through to the present day.

At 9 a.m. on Friday, Salt Lake Tribune data reporting fellow Shane Burke, reporters Andy Larsen and Courtney Tanner, and news columnist Robert Gehrke join KCPWs Roger McDonough to talk about the weeks top stories.

Every Friday at 9 a.m., stream Behind the Headlines atkcpw.org, or tune in to KCPW 88.3 FM or Utah Public Radio for the broadcast. Join the live conversation by calling 801-355-TALK.

See more here:

A new variant, censorship accusations, Utah's redlining consequences and more on 'Behind the Headlines' - Salt Lake Tribune

Infiel: what Cansu Dere thinks about censorship in Turkish soap operas – Market Research Telecast

In Turkey, as in several countries in the Middle East, audiovisual productions such as movies, soap operas or series must be developed respecting the laws and traditions of their respective territory and all this is supervised by the government of the day. That is why in Turkish dramas you hardly ever see risque scenes and an example of this is the soap opera Unfaithful.

In recent years, one of the countries that has been considered the cradle of successful international soap operas is Turkey. In his different productions, intimate or related scenes are not seen. This is because it is established by the Supreme Council of Radio and Television (RTUK).

This entity of the Turkish government has the function of ordering that all audiovisual productions follow to the letter the ethical rules suitable for all audiences. These rules are strictly based on traditional values. That is why scenes where alcohol consumption is observed, risque scenes or of that nature are censored.

The protagonist of the telenovela Unfaithful, Cansu Dere He ruled on this type of situation that has become normal in his country due to the fact that there are laws which have been established to be respected.

During her time in Spain, the famous actress gave an interview to some media and was consulted on this issue.

Censorship always limits, in any field, be it your work or your normal life. There is a limitation in our work, obviously. There are rules that we have to comply with by the country in which we are living. It is not very good to have so many limitations, but we have to complyCansu Dere expressed.

But this only, as revealed by the actress, happens with the productions of the state channels, something that does not happen with the pay channels.

Beyond the theme in which the telenovela revolves UnfaithfulWhich is Volkans infidelity towards Asya, the actress pointed out that the messages that can be seen in Turkish productions can help more people to get out of the situation they are in if they are going through a similar case.

There are many women who are experiencing infidelities in their real life. Through my last job (Infidel) a woman who has suffered from infidelity can imagine how she can fight in society and how she can get what she deserves. Asyas fight inspires many women in Turkish society, assured.

In an interview with the journalists to the actress, Cansu YouShe was also asked how she would feel if she made a bawdy scene in a series in Spain, because she is not used to doing this type of production.

Working in Spain, participating in a series would be fantastic for me, it would be another triumph, but I always see the works (productions), I get the script, the story, I value it and I give my answer. I would love to be in Spain working, He sentenced.

Cansu Dere He was born in Ankara on October 14, 1980, so, in 2021. At first, his career was planned to be different, because he studied Archeology at Istanbul University. He studied for two years and, in 2004, his life changed drastically.

Article Source

Disclaimer: This article is generated from the feed and not edited by our team.

See the rest here:

Infiel: what Cansu Dere thinks about censorship in Turkish soap operas - Market Research Telecast

When the open source ecosystem thrives in the cloud: IT leader insights – The Enterprisers Project

Software is eating the world and open sourcehas become the default way to build software. Public cloudhas accelerated the proliferation of open source technologies, and has led to an adjustment in both the enterprise procurement and monetization of software. After a few years of seismic realignment (the aftershocks are still reverberating through the ecosystem), we have reached a point where there are paths for software vendors to partner with or live in the marketplaces of the hyperscalers, says Jerry Chen, a venture capitalist at Greylock. Chen has a long history with open source - he was on the VMware team that made Cloud Foundry an open source project, and later funded Docker as a VC - and has written a series of articles calledCastles in the Cloud. I recently spoke with him as part ofRed Hats livestreaming show,In The Clouds.

Chen notes that one of the strengths of leveraging open source is that as a leader in a community, a company can connect directly to developers, data scientists, or other practitioners. In the past companies would have to find ways to avoid or take on the cloud providers, today the competitive environment looks quite different.

We are also close to seeing more billion dollar open source companies, Chen says, noting the recent IPOs of HashiCorp and GitLab, which both have over $200M in revenue and strong growth. The interview reaffirms that it is an exciting time for the technology industry in general, and for the future of open source software.

For additional insights from Chen, including career advice, commentary on the massive valuations of private companies, and much more,watch this episode of In the Clouds:

Jerry Chen andStu Miniman will also be at AWS re:Inventthe week of November 29th in Las Vegas.

Read the original post:
When the open source ecosystem thrives in the cloud: IT leader insights - The Enterprisers Project