WikiLeaks Live Tweets Glenn Greenwald’s Flight to US

Image: Adam Berry/Getty Images, Silvia Izquierdo/Associated Press

By Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai2014-04-11 14:25:19 UTC

Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras, two of the journalists Edward Snowden chose as recipients of the leaked cache of NSA secret documents that dominated headlines across the world for months, are about to land in the United States and WikiLeaks wants you to track their flight.

The anti-secrecy organization tweeted on Friday morning to alert its followers that Greenwald and Poitras were about to land in New York, where they're scheduled to accept the Polk Award for their reporting on the NSA leaks. WikiLeaks even published the two journalists' alleged flight number.

After that first update, WikiLeaks went on to basically live tweet their flight's progress.

It's unclear why WikiLeaks is doing this, but Greenwald's and Poitras' flight is newsworthy because this is the first time both journalists are going to be in the United States after breaking the NSA stories. WikiLeaks presumably wants to draw attention to their entrance in the U.S., in case there are any delays at customs.

In the past few months Greenwald has repeatedly said he wouldn't feel safe coming to the United States in the current political climate. In January, Director of National Intelligence Jams Clapper implied that the journalists working with Snowden are "accomplices" during a congressional hearing, and Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) said Greenwald should be prosecuted for his reporting.

Moreover, Poitras has often been stopped at the U.S. border and detained for hours for no apparent reason, which gives supporters of the two journalists some reason for concern.

But Greenwald told The Huffington Post on Thursday that he's not afraid.

"I shouldnt allow those tactics to stop me from returning to my own country," he said.

Excerpt from:
WikiLeaks Live Tweets Glenn Greenwald's Flight to US

WikiLeaks figure honored in Pride parade

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) An imprisoned U.S. Army private charged in a massive leak of U.S. secrets to the WikiLeaks website will serve as an honorary grand marshal in this year's San Francisco Pride parade.

Parade organizer Gary Virginia said Friday that Chelsea Manning formerly known as Bradley Manning was chosen to make amends for a controversy last year. Manning was named an honorary grand marshal ahead of the 2013 parade, but had the honor revoked.

Virginia apologized, saying that decision was mishandled.

The Chelsea Manning Support Network says Manning thanked Pride organizers for the honor from Fort Leavenworth military prison.

Stephen Peters, president of the American Military Partner Association a group advocating for same-sex military families says Manning's actions don't represent other gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people in uniform and that another choice would be more appropriate.

Read the rest here:
WikiLeaks figure honored in Pride parade

Edward Snowden Testimony @ Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) – 04/08/2014 – Video


Edward Snowden Testimony @ Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) - 04/08/2014
04/08/2014 US whistleblower Edward Snowden, testifying by video-link to a PACE hearing on mass surveillance. More: http://leaksource.info/2014/04/09/edward-s...

By: LeakSourceTV2

Go here to see the original:
Edward Snowden Testimony @ Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) - 04/08/2014 - Video

Open source software is more secure, right? So what happened with OpenSSL?

18 hours ago Apr. 11, 2014 - 8:38 AM PDT

One of the benefits often cited for the use of open-source software is that because it is so widely available and open to review by developers, anysecurity flaws will be caught sooner than with closed, proprietary systems. This weeks near-panicaround the Heartbleed flaw in OpenSSL open-source encryption software, calls that contention into question. When you have internet security czars tell people to stay off the internet,theres a problem.

The vulnerability, which afflicted popular web sites andnetworkinggear from Cisco and Juniper, has been around for more than two years but was brought to light by researchers at Google and Codenomiconearly this week. Thats a long time.

But the German programmerwho claimed responsibility for contributingthe flawed code in late 2011 told The Guardianthat he, not the open source model is to blame. Robin Seggelemann said his update did what it was supposed to do enable theHeartbeat feature in OpenSSL but also accidentally created the vulnerability that caused all the hubbub.

Seggelemann said hewrote the code and missed the necessary validation by an oversight. Unfortunately, this mistake also slipped through the review process and therefore made its way into the released version.

So why didthe resulting vulnerabilitystayunder the radar forso long? Because, in his view, OpenSSL, while widely deployed, is also under-funded.OpenSSL is definitely under-resourced for its wide distribution. It has millions of users but only very few actually contribute to the project, he told the Guardian.

And that brings us back to the question of whether open-source software is always best compared to company-funded-and-supported commercial (paid) software. Its good to debate the issue, but given the traction that Linux, Apache and perhaps OpenStack have gotten, this horse may haveleft the barn. And remember, commercial software companies havent exactly covered themselvesin glory with regards to security. Most notably,security giant RSAreportedly shipped encryptionsoftware witha known backdoor.

Subscriber Content

Subscriber content comes from Gigaom Research, bridging the gap between breaking news and long-tail research. Visit any of our reports to learn more and subscribe.

Read this article:
Open source software is more secure, right? So what happened with OpenSSL?