Cryptography – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cryptography (also known as cryptology; comes from Greek , kryptos, "hidden, secret"; and , grph, "I write", or -, -logia, respectively)[1] is the practice and study of hiding information. It is sometimes called code, but this is not really a correct name. It is the science used to try to keep information secret and safe. Modern cryptography is a mix of mathematics, computer science, and electrical engineering. Cryptography is used in ATM (bank) cards, computer passwords, and shopping on the internet.

When a message is sent using cryptography, it is changed (or encrypted) before it is sent. The method of changing text is called a "code" or, more precisely, a "cipher". The changed text is called "ciphertext". The change makes the message hard to read. Someone who wants to read it must change it back (or decrypt it). How to change it back is a secret. Both the person that sends the message and the one that gets it should know the secret way to change it, but other people should not be able to. Studying the cyphertext to discover the secret is called "cryptanalysis" or "cracking" or sometimes "code breaking".

Different types of cryptography can be easier or harder to use and can hide the secret message better or worse. Ciphers use a "key" which is a secret that hides the secret messages. The cryptographic method needn't be secret. Various people can use the same method but different keys, so they cannot read each others' messages. Since the Caesar cipher has only as many keys as the number of letters in the alphabet, it is easily cracked by trying all the keys. Ciphers that allow billions of keys are cracked by more complex methods.

In symmetric cryptography, both the sender and receiver share the key. The sender uses the key in a certain way to hide the message. Then, the receiver will use the same key in the opposite way to reveal the message. Most types of cryptography are symmetric. Advanced Encryption Standard is a widely used one.

Asymmetric cryptography is harder to use. Each person who wants to use asymmetric cryptography uses a secret key number, and a different number, a "public key" that they can tell everyone. If someone else wants to send this person a message, they'll use the number they've been told to hide the message. Now the message cannot be revealed, even by the sender, but the receiver can easily reveal the message with his secret or "private key". This way, nobody else needs to know the secret key.

The details of asymmetric cryptography make it less useful than symmetric cryptography for actually sending messages. Instead, it is often used for computer signatures, when a computer must know that a file was sent from a certain sender. For example, computer software companies that release updates for their software can sign those updates to prove that the update was made by them, so that hackers cannot make their own updates that would cause harm. Computers can also use asymmetric ciphers to give each other the keys for symmetric ciphers.

Computers can do hard math very fast, and because of this they can do very strong encryption. Examples are computer algorithms like RSA, AES, Blowfish, and many others. Using good algorithms like these can make it very hard to read the information that is sent.

People are better at patterns, changing order of words or letters, and using words with different meanings. Because people are slower than computers, any cryptography they use can probably be broken if enough of the secret way to change it is known.

Simple forms of cryptography that people can do without machines are Caesar ciphers and transposition ciphers, but there are lots more. They are especially useful in espionage because a spy won't be caught carrying a code machine.

Original post:
Cryptography - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chinese Bitcoin exchange focuses on cash transactions to keep cryptocurrency in play

Chinese banks may be cutting ties to Bitcoin suppliers, but that isnt stopping a local Bitcoin exchange from making physical cash a way to buy the cryptocurrency.

On Tuesday, BTC China, one of the nations largest exchanges, took a step to establish its own Bitcoin sellers network with the launch of a new web app, called Picaso ATM.

By using the app, the exchanges own clients can sell their bitcoins to customers.

BTC China is advocating sellers set their own profit margins and get cash in return. To complete transactions on the app, the sellers must meet face-to-face and input confirmation codes through their smartphones. The bitcoins are then transferred over to the customers account on BTC Chinas exchange.

Although the cash approach may seem outdated, China has been moving to ban banks and third-party payment services from dealing in bitcoins. Buying the virtual currency could once be done by wiring funds to an exchanges bank account. But starting this month, certain banks have begun closing the corporate accounts used by several exchanges.

While the ensuing crackdown hasnt affected all, its put pressure on Bitcoin suppliers to come up with new ways to keep the virtual currency in circulation.

In BTC Chinas case, the exchanges bank accounts are still in operation, but the companys sees promise in using cash transaction to popularize Bitcoin among Chinese users.

Despite the nations strict stance on Bitcoin, authorities have said consumers are still free to buy the virtual currency.

We do want to create a seller network, but we also simply want to help facilitate the ease at which people can acquire Bitcoin, BTC China said in an email.

On Tuesday, the exchange also unveiled what it claimed was the countrys first physical ATM Bitcoin machine. It is located in a coffee shop based in Shanghai.

Follow this link:
Chinese Bitcoin exchange focuses on cash transactions to keep cryptocurrency in play

Chelsea Manning’s 35-year sentence, conviction upheld

Manning

An Army general has upheld Pfc. Chelsea Manning's conviction and 35-year prison sentence for giving reams of classified U.S. government information to the WikiLeaks website, the Army said Monday.

The approval by Maj. Gen. Jeffery S. Buchanan, commander of the Military District of Washington, clears the way for an automatic appeal to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals.

Manning's appellate lawyers, Nancy Hollander and Vincent Ward, told supporters Sunday in Washington that they expect to argue that the sentence is unreasonable. It is the longest prison term ever given by a U.S. court for leaking government secrets to the media. They said they also expect to argue that Manning's speedy trial rights were violated, that the Espionage Act was misused and that high-ranking commanders improperly influenced her case.

The 26-year-old Crescent, Okla., native is serving her sentence at Fort Leavenworth, Kan.

Visit link:
Chelsea Manning's 35-year sentence, conviction upheld

Army general denies Chelsea Manning clemency over WikiLeaks case

An Army general upheld Private Chelsea Manning's 35-year prison sentence on Monday for turning over classified files to WikiLeaks.

With Major General Jeffrey S. Buchanan denying Manning, formerly Bradley Manning, clemency, the case will now go up to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals, reports Reuters.

When Manning sought leniency over her sentence, Manning also filed for a presidential appeal - the Obama administration has said they won't step in during the appeals process. Her defense lawyers argued that the release of nearly 700,000 documents, videos and diplomatic cables was done for the good of the public and not for any nefarious reason.

According to The Associated Press, Nancy Hollander and Vincent Ward, Manning's appellate lawyers, said they believe that her prison sentence is egregious and the slow trial violated her rights.

On top of that, the two attorneys say they will argue that commanders influenced the ruling in her case, which resulted in Manning being convicted on 20 charges though she pleaded guilty to 10.

She was convicted of six violations of the Espionage Act and 14 other offenses . Hollander and Ward believe that the several charges were the result of the misuse of the EA.

Follow this link:
Army general denies Chelsea Manning clemency over WikiLeaks case

Bradley Manning named honorary grand marshal of San Francisco Pride parade

A 35-year prison sentence for espionage isnt stopping former Army Pvt. Bradley Manning from becoming an honorary grand marshal of the San Francisco Pride parade.

Manning, who now prefers to be referred to as Chelsea Elizabeth Manning, released a statement from Fort Leavenworth prison: As a trans woman, I appreciate the Pride movements significant role in bringing together diverse communities and elevating the public profile of the fight for queer rights.

I have always enjoyed attending Pride celebrations given the opportunity, and Im deeply honored to receive this title.

Not all military activists and service members were happy with the choice.

They will reap what they sow. You reap lawlessness, dont expect it to help you in the end. They have once again spit in the face of the LGBT Military community, all in the name of senseless ideology. Once again, shame on San Francisco Pride, said San Diego-based LGBT military activist Sean Sala, a local news station reported.

Mr. Sala organized a boycott last year when San Francisco Pride bestowed the same honor on Manning.

The American Military Partner Association, a resource and support network for LGBT military spouses and their families, also weighed in, the Associated Press reported. Its president, Stephen Peters, said Mannings actions are not representative of many gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines.

Read more:
Bradley Manning named honorary grand marshal of San Francisco Pride parade

Snowden leaks win Pulitzers

By Brian Stelter, CNN

updated 7:37 AM EDT, Tue April 15, 2014

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

(CNN) -- Two news organizations' stories about National Security Agency surveillance, based upon documents leaked by Edward Snowden, have been awarded the Pulitzer Prize for public service, often described as the highest prize in American journalism.

The Washington Post and United States arm of The Guardian each received the prize on Monday.

The Pulitzers are administered by Columbia University. More than a dozen prizes were announced on Monday, but the recognition of the NSA reporting was most significant because of the questions raised by Snowden's leaks and the reaction to them.

The Pulitzer board's decision is bound to be controversial; then again, snubbing the NSA coverage would have been controversial, too.

Snowden, who has been living in Russia while seeking asylum from U.S. prosecution, said in a statement that the Pulitzer board's recognition of the coverage was "vindication for everyone who believes that the public has a role in government."

"We owe it to the efforts of the brave reporters and their colleagues who kept working in the face of extraordinary intimidation, including the forced destruction of journalistic materials, the inappropriate use of terrorism laws, and so many other means of pressure to get them to stop what the world now recognizes was work of vital public importance."

While Snowden provided a trove of documents, reporters including Glenn Greenwald, working for the Guardian; Barton Gellman, working for The Post; and Laura Poitras, who worked with both, pored over the raw information, decided with their editors what parts were ethical to publish, and turned the information into stories that stunned readers around the world.

Read the original:
Snowden leaks win Pulitzers

Snowden revelations earn Pulitzer for The Washington Post and The Guardian

NEW YORK The Washington Post and The Guardian won the Pulitzer Prize in public service Monday for revealing the U.S. government's sweeping surveillance efforts in a blockbuster series of stories based on secret documents supplied by NSA leaker Edward Snowden.

The prize for national reporting went to David Philipps of The Gazette in Colorado Springs for an investigation that found that the Army has discharged escalating numbers of traumatized combat veterans who commit crimes at home.

Two of the nation's biggest and most distinguished newspapers, The Washington Post and The New York Times, won two Pulitzers each, while the other awards were scattered among a variety of publications large and small.

The stories about the National Security Agency's spy programs revealed that the government systematically has collected information about millions of Americans' phone calls and e-mails.

The disclosures set off a furious debate in the United States over privacy versus security and led President Barack Obama to impose limits on the surveillance.

The NSA stories were written by Barton Gellman at The Washington Post and Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras and Ewan MacAskill, whose work was published by The Guardian US, the British newspaper's American operation, based in New York.

"I think this is amazing news," Poitras said. "It's a testament to Snowden's courage, a vindication of his courage and his desire to let the public know what the government is doing."

Snowden, a former contract employee at the NSA, has been charged with espionage and other offenses in the U.S. and could get 30 years in prison if convicted. In a statement issued by the Freedom of the Press Foundation, Snowden saluted "the brave reporters and their colleagues who kept working in the face of extraordinary intimidation, including the forced destruction of journalistic materials, the inappropriate use of terrorism laws, and so many other means of pressure to get them to stop."

Snowden's critics have branded him a traitor. "To be rewarding illegal conduct, to be enabling a traitor like Snowden, to me is not something that should be rewarded with a Pulitzer Prize," said Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y. "Snowden has violated his oath. He has put American lives at risk."

The Post's Gelman said the stories were the product of the "most exhilarating and frightening year of reporting."

Read this article:
Snowden revelations earn Pulitzer for The Washington Post and The Guardian

Washington Post wins Pulitzer Prize for NSA spying revelations; Guardian also honored

A team of 28 Post journalists, led by reporter Barton Gellman, won the public service award, as did Guardian US, which also reported extensively about the NSAs secret programs. Gellman and Glenn Greenwald, then the Guardians lead reporter on the NSA pieces, based their articles on classified documents leaked by Edward Snowden, the former government contractor who has fled to exile in Russia, lending a controversial edge to this years awards.

The Posts Eli Saslow also won a Pulitzer newspaper journalisms highest award for a series of stories about the challenges of people living on food stamps. Saslow, 31, was cited in the explanatory-journalism category by the 19-member Pulitzer board in an announcement at Columbia University in New York, which administers the prizes.

The Boston Globe won in the breaking-news category for its extensive coverage of the Boston Marathon bombings last April.

The New York Times swept the two photography categories. The award in breaking photography went to Tyler Hicks for his photos of a terrorist attack on a shopping mall in Nairobi, and the feature-photography prize went to Josh Haner for his photos of a Boston Marathon bombing victim who lost most of both legs.

The prize for investigative reporting went to Chris Hamby of the nonprofit Center for Public Integrity in Washington for articles about lawyers and doctors who rigged a system to deny benefits to coal miners stricken with black-lung disease.

NSA reporting

The awards to The Post and the U.S. arm of the British-based Guardian newspaper for their NSA reporting are likely to generate debate, much like the Pulitzer boards decision to award its public service medal to the New York Times in 1972 for its disclosures of the Pentagon Papers, a secret government history of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.

In both the NSA and Pentagon Papers stories, the reporting was based on leaks of secret documents by government contractors. Both Snowden and Daniel Ellsberg who leaked the Pentagon Papers to Times reporter Neil Sheehan were called traitors for their actions. And both the leakers and the news organizations that published the stories were accused by critics, including members of Congress, of enabling espionage and harming national security.

But Post Executive Editor Martin Baron said Monday that the reporting exposed a national policy with profound implications for American citizens constitutional rights and the rights of individuals around the world.

Disclosing the massive expansion of the NSAs surveillance network absolutely was a public service, Baron said. In constructing a surveillance system of breathtaking scope and intrusiveness, our government also sharply eroded individual privacy. All of this was done in secret, without public debate, and with clear weaknesses in oversight.

More:
Washington Post wins Pulitzer Prize for NSA spying revelations; Guardian also honored

Guardian, Washington Post Get Pulitzers for NSA Reporting

The Guardian US and Post are awarded Pulitzers for Public Service for their reporting on secret NSA spying, largely based on the leaks of former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

The Washington Post and the Guardian US were on Monday awarded Pulitzer Prizes for their reporting on the nature and breadth of secret electronic surveillance conducted by the National Security Agency, largely based on the revelations of former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

The Post and the Guardian US were each awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, the Pulitzer Prize committee's highest honor. Newsday's reporting on misconduct by police officers in Long Island, N.Y. was also nominated for the Public Service prize.

In revealing "widespread secret surveillance by the National Security Agency," the Post's reporting was described as "marked by authoritative and insightful reports that helped the public understand how the disclosures fit into the larger framework of national security." The Guardian US, an online product of the U.K.-based Guardian newspaper, was singled out for "aggressive reporting" that helped to "spark a debate about the relationship between the government and the public over issues of security and privacy."

Snowden began leaking documents to Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald in late 2012 about the nature and scope of computer spying by the U.S. security agency. In June 2013, the first of those leaked documents were published and would be followed up by reports from The Guardian, The Washington Post, The New York Times, Der Spiegel, and many more newspapers and media outlets around the world.

Snowden's revelations have strained diplomatic relations between the United States and countries spied on digitally by the NSA. The U.S. government has attempted to assuage anger over the revelations, which have also sparked an internal debate in this country about how much government snooping at home and abroad is acceptable.

The Government Accountability Project (GAP), which has represented Snowden, said Monday that the Pulitzers won by the Post and Guardian US were a "direct result" of the NSA whistleblower's revelations.

"The Prize committee awards this Pulitzer to media outlets for their 'distinguished example of public service,' and this recognition therefore represents undeniable validation of the significance of the Snowden disclosures," said GAP executive director Bea Edwards.

"Americans are now aware of the dragnet electronic surveillance conducted by the NSA only because a whistleblower, Mr. Snowden, exposed it, and through The Washington Post and the Guardian US, sparked a national debate."

Included among the documents and reports were a number of confidence-shaking revelations for the tech industry. For example, it was reported last December that the NSA paid the computer security firm RSA $10 million to create a 'back door' entry point in its encryption software. RSA denied knowingly striking any such deal, but the damage was donenumerous regular attendees of the company's annual RSA Conference boycotted this year's event.

Visit link:
Guardian, Washington Post Get Pulitzers for NSA Reporting