Chelsea Manning | QuickiWiki

Born Bradley Edward Manning in 1987 in Crescent, Oklahoma, she was the second child of Susan Fox, originally from Wales, and Brian Manning, an American. Brian had joined the United States Navy in 1974 at the age of 19, and served for five years as an intelligence analyst. Brian met Susan in a local Woolworths while stationed in Wales at Cawdor Barracks. Manning's sister was born in 1976. The couple returned to the United States in 1979, moving first to California, then to a two-story house outside Crescent, with an above-ground swimming pool and 5 acres (2 hectares) of land where they kept pigs and chickens.[14]

Manning's sister Casey, 11 years her senior, told the court-martial that both their parents were alcoholics, and that their mother had drunk continually while pregnant. Captain David Moulton, a Navy psychiatrist, told the court that Manning's facial features showed signs of fetal alcohol syndrome.[15] Casey became Manning's principal caregiver, waking at night to make the baby a bottle. The court heard that Manning was fed only milk and baby food until the age of two. As an adult she reached 5ft 2in (1.57m) and weighed around 105 pounds (47.6kg).[16]

Manning's father took a job as an information technology (IT) manager for a rental car agency, which meant he had to travel. The family lived several miles out of town and Manning's mother was unable to drive. She spent her days drinking, while Manning was left largely to fend for herself, playing with Legos or on the computer. Brian would stock up on food before his trips, and leave pre-signed checks that Casey mailed to pay the bills. A neighbor said that whenever Manning's elementary school went on field trips, she would give her own son extra food or money so he could make sure Manning had something to eat. Friends and neighbors considered the Mannings a troubled family.[17]

Those who knew Manning said that even as a child, she always had a mind of her own. She was an atheist who was openly opposed to religion, for example, remaining silent during the part of the Pledge of Allegiance that refers to God.[18] In a 2011 interview Manning's father said, "People need to understand that he's a young man that had a happy life growing up." He also said that Manning excelled at the saxophone, science, and computers, creating her first website at the age of ten. Manning taught herself how to use PowerPoint, won the grand prize three years in a row at the local science fair, and in sixth grade, took top prize at a statewide quiz bowl.[19]

A childhood friend of Manning's, speaking about a conversation they had when Manning was 13, said "he told me he was gay." The friend also stated that Manning's home life was not good and that her father was very controlling. Around this time, Manning's parents divorced, and she and her mother Susan moved out of the house to a rented apartment in Crescent, Oklahoma.[20] Susan's instability continued and in 1998 she attempted suicide; Manning's sister had to drive them to the hospital, with Manning sitting in the back of the car trying to make sure their mother was still breathing.[21]

Manning's father remarried in 2000, the same year as his divorce. His new wife was also named Susan and had a son from a previous relationship. Manning apparently reacted badly when the son changed his surname to Manning too; she started taking running jumps at the walls, telling her mother: "I'm nobody now."[22]

In November 2001, Manning and her mother left the United States and moved to Haverfordwest, Wales, where her mother had family. Manning attended the town's Tasker Milward secondary school. A schoolfriend there told Ed Caesar for The Sunday Times that Manning's personality was "unique, extremely unique. Very quirky, very opinionated, very political, very clever, very articulate." Manning's interest in computers continued, and in 2003, she and a friend set up a website, angeldyne.com, a message board that offered games and music downloads.[23]

Manning became the target of bullying at the school because she was the only American and was viewed as effeminate (she was living as a boy at that time). Manning had identified to two friends in Oklahoma as gay, but was not open about it at school in Wales. The students would imitate her accent, and apparently abandoned her once during a camping trip; her aunt told The Washington Post that Manning awoke to an empty camp one morning, after everyone else packed up their tents and left without her.[24]

Manning feared that her mother was becoming too ill to cope, so in 2005 (at the age of 17) Manning returned to the United States.[25] She moved in with her father in Oklahoma City, where he was living with his second wife and her child. Manning got a job as a developer with a software company, Zoto, and was apparently happy for a time, but was let go after four months. Her boss told The Washington Post that on a few occasions, Manning had "just locked up," and would simply sit and stare, and in the end communication became too difficult. The boss told the newspaper that "nobody's been taking care of this kid for a really long time."[26]

By then, Manning was living as an openly gay man. Her relationship with her father was apparently good, but there were problems between Manning and her stepmother. In March 2006, Manning reportedly threatened her stepmother with a knife during an argument about Manning's failure to get another job; the stepmother called the police and Manning was asked to leave the house. Manning drove to Tulsa in a pickup truck her father had given her, at first sleeping in it, then moving in with a friend from school. The two got jobs at Incredible Pizza in April, and then Manning spent time in Chicago before running out of money and again having nowhere to stay. Her mother arranged for Brian's sister, Debra, a lawyer in Potomac, Maryland, to take Manning in. Nicks writes that the 15 months Manning spent with her aunt were among the most stable of her life. Manning had a boyfriend, took several low-paid jobs, and spent a semester studying history and English at Montgomery College, but left after failing an exam.[27]

View original post here:
Chelsea Manning | QuickiWiki

Highlights From Newly Released NSA Oversight Reports Reveal Bumbling Ineptitude But No Evidence Of Systematic Abuse

A few hours before Christmas Eve, the National Security Agency released more than a decades worth of damning reports on its website. The reports, which had been submitted by the NSA to the Presidents Intelligence Oversight Board from 2001 to 2013, purport to cover any activity that could be considered unlawful or contrary to government policy. They included incidents in which individual employees abused their security clearances to target a current or former romantic partner as well as dozens of breaches that resulted from overly broad database queries, along with a lack of rigor in determining whether a foreign intelligence target had entered the United States or held US citizenship or permanent resident status. There were also numerous breaches related to poor data security.

In the documents, which were released in response to a FOIA lawsuit brought by the ACLU, NSA analysts are revealed to be all-too-human bumblers, mistakenly searching on their own information, improperly using colleagues credentials, sending highly classified information to the wrong printer, and mistyping email addresses.

There is no evidence in the reports of systematic lawbreakingnot a surprise considering the reports author. Instead, the NSA attributes most of its lapses to unintentional human error or technical mistakes. In a handful of cases, the agency points out, investigations have led to discipline or administrative action. Even so, the reports raise serious questions about the NSAs ability to protect the vast amount of personal data that is vacuumed up by its surveillance apparatus.

Courtesy: Cory Grenier

I became interested in the NSA spying program almost a decade ago when I learned about a large order AT&T had placed for Narus Semantic Traffic Analyzers. The equipment made it possible to inspect Internet traffic in real time, which made it a great tool for spying. A source had told me that the analyzers had been deployed in secret rooms around the country on behalf of the NSA. I looked into the story, but ultimately my editors chose not to pursue it. Even if I could prove it, they werent sure anyone would be interested in the specific details of how telecoms like AT&T were cooperating with the NSA. It was an era of limited newsroom resources, and we had other stories to pursue.

There was also a key question that I wasnt sure I could answer even if I confirmed my tip. Had any Americans been hurt by NSA spying? This is a concern that comes up again and again. Its raised by judges presiding over lawsuits brought by public advocates and civil libertarians. The lack of an affirmative answer is used to justify ongoing surveillance.

Yet, we still dont know if any individual has been hurt or what potential exists for someone to be hurt in the future. A lot depends on what the NSA does with information it collects on those it refers to as US Persons, or USPs, and most of that information is withheld from the public. The NSA claims it takes great pains to comply with the U.S. Constitution, as well as U.S. laws and regulations. The Christmas Eve reports are interesting because they showed where the agency, in its own opinion, has fallen short.

The agencys reports, which emphasize incidents in which US persons were improperly targeted, dont appear at first to correlate with a cache of 160,000 intercepted communications that the Washington Post obtained via Edward Snowden. The Post reporters claimed ordinary Internet users, American and non-American alike, far outnumber legally targeted foreigners in the communications intercepted by theNational Security Agency. The story, published in July, raised new questions about the collateral harm to privacy from NSA surveillance.

Excerpt from:
Highlights From Newly Released NSA Oversight Reports Reveal Bumbling Ineptitude But No Evidence Of Systematic Abuse

Encryption can help ramp up your IT security

Ken Colburn, Special for The Republic| azcentral.com 10:03 p.m. MST December 26, 2014

Encryption can provide an excellent level of security.(Photo: Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Question: One of the things I keep hearing about because of the Sony hack is encryption. How exactly do I get it set up for my business?

Answer: There isn't enough space in this column to cover all the lessons that can be learned from what continues to come out of the Sony Pictures massive hacking event.

The use of encryption is a big one because it can provide an excellent level of security even if cyberthieves make off with thousands of sensitive files via a compromised computer.

Anytime everyone has access to everything on a business network without any real security, hackers need only compromise one user to wreak havoc for everyone (the likely scenario in the Sony hack).

Encryption acts as another security barrier that will generally cause the hackers to move on because of the time that it will take to break the encryption.

Encryption technology is built into most operating systems; Windows has BitLocker for workstations and servers (http://goo.gl/N0vPuy). Mac OS X has FileVault (http://goo.gl/4SpCBe). Or you can use encryption programs from many third-party companies.

Before you make any decisions to start encrypting your data, you should review all of the options, pros, cons, security and backup measures to make sure you don't inadvertently lock yourself out of your own data.

Encryption strategy needs to be thought through, so make sure you consult your IT support group before you get started.

View original post here:
Encryption can help ramp up your IT security

Open Source’s 2014: MS ‘cancer’ embrace, NASDAQ listings, and a quiet dog

Ho hum. Another year, another slew of open source announcements that prove the once-maligned development methodology is now so mainstream as to be tedious. Running most of the worlds most powerful supercomputers? Been there, done that. Giving retailers the ability to deliver highly customized paper coupons to consumers based on warehouse inventory nearby? So 2013!

And yet in 2014 we had a few events in open source that managed to surprise us, and suggest an even brighter future.

The biggest open source news of 2014 actually isnt. News, that is. As Red Hat storage executive Neil Levine opines, the dog that didn't bark in 2014 was the fact that "no major enterprise platform launched this year that wasn't built with [open source software]".

In fact, as Cloudera co-founder Mike Olson declares: No dominant platform-level software infrastructure has emerged in the last ten years in closed-source, proprietary form. Even proprietary platforms such as Amazon Web Services are built almost entirely from open source components.

Which is why its so significant that we got our first open source IPO since 2007, when security vendor Sourcefire went public on the back of the popular Snort project. Prior to Sourcefire only two other open source companies made it to the public markets, both in 1999: Red Hat and VA Linux.

Of those three open source vendors, only one remains as a public company: Red Hat. VA Linux imploded soon after its offering, and Sourcefire was acquired by Cisco in 2013.

Which is all the more reason to celebrate the arrival of Hortonworks, which soared to a billion-dollar valuation on its first day of public trading (after falling from its previous billion-dollar valuation on the private markets).

While its nice that the IPO made its executives rich(er) - many of them made millions as part of the JBoss and SpringSource acquisitions by Red Hat and VMware, respectively - the real importance of Hortonworks IPO is that it paves the way for many more open source companies to become independent peers to Red Hat.

Linus Law: Given a large enough beta-tester

and co-developer base, almost every problem

Read this article:
Open Source's 2014: MS 'cancer' embrace, NASDAQ listings, and a quiet dog

‘Citizenfour’ Producers Sued Over Edward Snowden Leaks …

The U.S. government still wants to get its hands on Edward Snowden, the former CIA officer who has detailed the extent to which the NSA spies on citizens. Here's a timely question: Would the federal government ever do anything about Citizenfour, the Oscar-contending documentary that features Snowden?

So far, the Barack Obama administration has given the film a pass, but on Friday, one former government official decided that enough was enough.

Read more'Citizenfour': New York Review

Horace Edwards, who identifies himself as a retired naval officer and the former secretary of the Kansas Department of Transportation, has filed a lawsuit in Kansas federal court that seeks a constructive trust over monies derived from the distribution of Citizenfour. Edwards, who says he has "Q" security clearance and was the chief executive of the ARCO Pipeline Company, seeks to hold Snowden, director Laura Poitras, The Weinstein Co., Participant Media and others responsible for "obligations owed to the American people" and "misuse purloined information disclosed to foreign enemies."

It's an unusual lawsuit, one that the plaintiff likens to "a derivative action on behalf of the American Public," and is primarily based upon Snowden's agreement with the United States to keep confidentiality.

Represented by attorney Jean Lamfers, Edwards appears to be making the argument that Snowden's security clearance creates a fiduciary duty of loyalty one that was allegedly breached by Snowden's participation in the production of Citizenfour without allowing prepublication clearance review. As for the producers and distributors, they are said to be "aiding and abetting the theft and misuse of stolen government documents."

See more Surveillance Cinema: 14 Movies Featuring Big Brother

The lawsuit seeks a constructive trust to redress the alleged unjust enrichment by the film. A 1980 case that involved a former CIA officer's book went up to the Supreme Court and might have opened the path to such a remedy, though the high court said nothing about orders against private citizens like the filmmaker. Assuming Edwards has standing to pursue the lawsuit hardly a given wouldn't that be censorship?

"This relief does not infringe upon First Amendment rights but maintains a reasonable balance between national security and the fundamental Constitutional protections of Freedom of the Press," the lawsuit states. "No censorship occurs and no public access is restrained. Rather, upon information and belief, this lawsuit seeks relief against those who profiteer by pretending to be journalists and whistleblowers but in effect are evading the law and betraying their country."

Edwards is clearly upset by Snowden's actions, calling them "dishonorable and indefensible and not the acts of a legitimate whistleblower," as well as by Hollywood for "omit[ting] from the storyline" perceived acts of foreign espionage, and Poitras for doing things like "hiding [Snowden] in her hotel room while he changes into light disguise, accepting all of the purloined information to use for her personal benefit financially and professionally, filming Defendant Snowdens meeting with a lawyer in Hong Kong as he tries to seek asylum"

More:
'Citizenfour' Producers Sued Over Edward Snowden Leaks ...

Chelsea Manning demo US Embassy, London – UK Indymedia

The Solidarity Collective, Wise Up Wales and The Black Banner held a noise demo outside the US Embassy last night in support of Welsh-American whistle-blower Chelsea Manning. They were joined by Queer Strike and The Pay Day men's network after their successful vigil outside St Martin-in-the-Fields.

20+ people turned up with placards and many banners. The soundtrack from the Collateral Murder video was played at high volume through a sound system, inter-spliced with audio of Charlie Chaplin's speech from the film The Great Dictator. There were several eloquent and rousing speeches which made clear to those inside the embassy that Chelsea had not been forgotten.

It is common knowledge that Chelsea is serving 35 years in prison for the release of information some of which formed the Afghan War Diaries, the Iraq War logs and the Collateral Murder video which exposed the cruel murder of several civilians, including two Reuters reporters and the shooting of two children. What is often forgotten is that US claims that the released information put lives in danger and caused damage to the US do not stand up to scrutiny.

For a start it has to be remembered that governments all over the world release classified information in the form of leaks to newspapers every week when it suits them. Journalists like Bob Woodward have made careers out of this form of information release.

Secondly, none of the released information was Top Secret or compartmentalized, nor did it discuss current or ongoing military operations.

Some of the information released was classified as secret but this was because it was kept on the Department of Defence's classified Network called SIPRNET; all information kept on SIPRNET is originally classified as secret. In her testimony Manning explained that she believed that the "secret classification" of these files diminished within 48 to 72 hours because the information had been publicly released or concerned units that were no longer on the operations concerned.

The Collateral Murder video was reviewed by a U.S. Central Command as not even being classified at the lowest level.

The Diplomatic files were anything but secret having been released to over a million government workers including private contractors.

The only files that could have caused immediate danger to lives were the Human Intelligence files (HUMINT) which concerned the identity of intelligence sources and intelligence tactics. These were never released by Manning. Consequently there has been no evidence that any one has been killed due to the release of the Wikileaks files.

Finally, several US government damage assessment reviews, including one by the Information Review Task Force, have all found that there has been no damage to the US as a result of these leaks.

Go here to read the rest:
Chelsea Manning demo US Embassy, London - UK Indymedia

Report: Snowden applies for extended asylum in Russia

U.S. National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden has applied for extended asylum in Russia, according to news reports.

Snowden, the former NSA contractor who has leaked details of the agency's worldwide surveillance activities, will seek an extension after Russia's approval for him to stay expires on July 31, according to a Wednesday report in Russia news site RT.com.

Snowden, living in Russia for the past year, has submitted documents to "prolong his stay," said his lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, quoted in the story.

Kucherena did not tell RT.com if Snowden was seeking a new residency status, such as Russian citizenship. A decision on Snowden's status is up to the Russia government, the lawyer said.

Snowden faces charges of espionage and theft of government property in the U.S.

Meanwhile, Snowden's leaks continue to generate news. On Wednesday, The Intercept reported that the NSA and FBI have covertly monitored the emails of prominent Muslims in the U.S. including civil rights activists, professors and lawyers.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is [emailprotected]

Go here to read the rest:
Report: Snowden applies for extended asylum in Russia

Free Website Web Design Builder | Open Source Software for Business Marketing – Video


Free Website Web Design Builder | Open Source Software for Business Marketing
Learn to create stunning one page web pages that make instant conversions. Using an easy drag and drop website builder you can create easy websites in second...

By: Linktrusted

See original here:
Free Website Web Design Builder | Open Source Software for Business Marketing - Video