New Associate Head of EECS Announced

New Associate Head of EECS Announced

January 27, 2015

New Associate Head of EECS Announced

Professor Silvio Micali succeeded Professor Bill Freeman as Associate Head of MITs Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) on Jan. 15.

Professor Micalis appointment was announced by EECS Department Head Anantha Chandrakasan. According to the MIT News Office, Chandrakasan said that Micali would bring clarity, creativity, and passion to his new position.

Micali, an EECS professor since 1983, has received numerous awards for his work in cryptography and information security, including the RSA Mathematics Award and the Gdel Prize in theoretical computer science. He and MIT professor Shafi Goldwasser won the 2012 (ACM) A.M. Turing award in theoretical computer science for their advances in cryptography. Micali also founded two startup companies, Peppercoin and CoreStreet, and possesses over 50 patents related to his work in information security.

Continued here:
New Associate Head of EECS Announced

Google provided WikiLeaks journalists’ metadata in Julian …

Sarah Harrison, assistant to Julian Assange, thanks supporters outside Ecuador's embassy in London in 2012. She is among the journalists whose details were provided to authorities. Photo: Supplied

EXCLUSIVE

Google secretly gave the emails of WikiLeaks journalists to the US government in response to an espionage investigation targeting Julian Assange, according to documents disclosed by the internet giant.

Three journalists who have worked for WikiLeaks since 2010 Sarah Harrison, Joseph Farrell and Kristinn Hrafnsson have been informed by Google that all their Gmail account content, metadata, subscriber information, and other content were provided to US federal law enforcement in response to search warrants issued in March 2012.

Julian Assange (right) and Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino address media at the Ecuadorian embassy in 2014. Photo: AP

The Google accounts of WikiLeaks staff were accessed as part of an investigation of alleged conspiracy to commit espionage. US laws referenced in the warrants include those relating to espionage, conspiracy, theft or conversion of US government property and computer fraud and abuse.

Advertisement

The warrants were issued by US District Court magistrate John F. Anderson, the same magistrate in the eastern district of Virginia who, in June 2013, issued an arrest warrant for former US intelligence contractor Edward Snowden.

Google notified the three WikiLeaks staff of the warrants on December 23, 2014. It hadhanded all the data to the US government by April 5, 2012, 32 months earlier.

The US Justice Department opened an investigation of WikiLeaks in 2010 after the website began publishing secret US diplomatic and military reports leaked by US soldier Chelsea Manning, then known as Bradley Manning. The thousands of leaked documents covered US military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq and the conduct of US diplomacy across the globe, generating massive political embarrassment.

Go here to see the original:
Google provided WikiLeaks journalists' metadata in Julian ...

WikiLeaks blasts Google for handing emails to government

WikiLeaks, founded by Julian Assange, landed in the public spotlight in 2010 when it published a trove of classified government information, including leaked US diplomatic cables.

San Francisco: WikiLeaks criticized Google Inc on Monday, alleging that the company waited 2-1/2 years to notify members of the anti-secrecy group that it had turned over their private emails and other information to the US government.

In a letter to Google, lawyers representing WikiLeaks said they were astonished and disturbed by Googles actions relating to search warrants it received from federal law enforcement officials and asked for a full accounting of the information Google gave the government.

The revelation follows leaks by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden detailing controversial US government surveillance practices and assurances from technology firms like Google that they would do their utmost to safeguard users personal information.

While it is too late for our clients to have the notice they should have had, they are still entitled to a list of Googles disclosures to the government and an explanation why Google waited more than two and a half years to provide any notice, read the letter from the Center for Constitutional Rights on behalf of WikiLeaks and addressed to Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt and General Counsel Kent Walker.

WikiLeaks, founded by Julian Assange, landed in the public spotlight in 2010 when it published a trove of classified government information, including leaked US diplomatic cables.

Google, whose online services include the worlds No.1 Internet search engine as well as the popular Web email service Gmail, notified three members of WikiLeaks on December 23, 2014 that it had provided all of their email content, subscriber information, metadata and other content to law enforcement officials more than two years earlier, according to the letter.

Google provided the information in response to warrants for an investigation concerning espionage, conspiracy to commit espionage and the theft or conversion of property belonging to the US government, among other items, the letter said.

Google said in a statement on Monday that it has a policy of informing users about government requests except in limited cases, like when we are gagged by a court order, which sadly happens quite frequently.

Google noted that it has pushed to unseal all the documents related to the investigation.

See the article here:
WikiLeaks blasts Google for handing emails to government

Google Gave WikiLeaks Data to Feds…2.5 Years Ago

"We are astonished and disturbed that Google waited" 2.5 years to notify us, WikiLeaks said today.

WikiLeaks is a little peeved that Google handed over details about WikiLeaks staffers to the feds, and failed to inform the whistleblower organization for more than two years.

According to WikiLeaks, Google provided the U.S. government with email content, metadata, contacts, draft emails, deleted emails, and IP addresses connected to the accounts of Investigations editor Sarah Harrison, Section Editor Joseph Farrell, and senior journalist and spokesperson Kristinn Hrafnsson.

That document turnover apparently happened 2.5 years ago, but WikiLeaks was not informed until Dec. 23, 2014, the organization wrote in a Monday letter to Google.

"We are astonished and disturbed that Google waited over two and a half years to notify subscribers that a search warrant was issued for their records," WikiLeaks said.

According to WikiLeaks, the U.S. government is trying to build a case against WikiLeaks for espionage, conspiracy to commit espionage, theft or conversion of property belonging to the U.S. government, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act violations, and conspiracy.

In 2010, WikiLeaks released 250,000 cables from the State Department, as well as U.S. Army field reports about the Iraq War and military logs of the war in Afghanistan.

WikiLeaks said its staff does not use Google services "for internal communications or for communicating with sources, [but] the search warrants nonetheless represent a substantial invasion of their personal privacy and freedom."

Companies like Google are often unable to disclose when it receives requests for information - and releases that data - due to gag orders. WikiLeaks said "there is no indication that Google fought the gag, and it is unlikely that the gag just happened to expire the day before Christmas."

According to WikiLeaks, Twitter fought a similar gags for warrants "in much shorter time-frames." Those documents were unsealed in 2011.

See the original post:
Google Gave WikiLeaks Data to Feds...2.5 Years Ago

WikiLeaks threatens legal action against Google and US after email revelations

WikiLeaks journalist Sarah Harrison addresses the media at the Geneva Press Club on Tuesday. Photograph: Pierre Albouy/Reuters

WikiLeaks is fighting back in an escalating war with both Google and the US government, threatening legal action the day after demanding answers for the tech giants wholesale handover of its staffers Gmail contents to US law enforcement.

The targets of the investigation were not notified until two and a half years after secret search warrants were issued and served by the FBI, legal representatives for WikiLeaks said in a press conference on Monday.

Were looking at legal action not only with Google but to those who actually turned in the order, said Baltasar Garzn, the head of Julian Assanges legal defence team. Calling the order illegal and arbitrary, Garzn said insisted any information that would be used from the taking of documents [this way] will be considered as biased, illegal and will cancel the whole proceedings.

Im not sure what craziness what desperation went into the US to make them behave this way, but this is a clear violation of rights, Garzn said.

Our policy is to tell people about government requests for their data, except in limited cases, like when we are gagged by a court order, which sadly happens quite frequently, a Google spokesperson said in a statement to the Guardian. Weve challenged many orders related to WikiLeaks which has led to disclosures to people who are affected. Weve also pushed to unseal all the documents related to the investigation.

Michael Ratner, a member of the Assange legal team in the US and president emeritus of the Center for Constitutional Rights, said that WikiLeaks had sent a letter to Googles executive chairman, Eric Schmidt, asking why the company waited so long before notifying the targets of the warrants.

On Monday, Ratner went further, saying that WikiLeaks would decide on what legal action to take depending on Googles response to the letter, which he said was expected within a week.

The notification of the court order was sent by email from Google to WikiLeaks on 23 December 2014 just before Christmas, a typically quiet time for the news cycle and was published on WikiLeaks site. Google said the legal process was initially subject to a nondisclosure or gag order that prohibited Google from disclosing the existence of the legal process.

Ratner told the Guardian that there were several questions as to what that legal process entailed. Did Google go to court at all? Ratner said. Would they have notified us that that we went to court and we lost? I dont know.

Visit link:
WikiLeaks threatens legal action against Google and US after email revelations

WikiLeaks ponders legal action against Google, US after ‘privacy violation’

Lawyer for Julian Assange Melinda Taylor, WikiLeaks journalists Kristinn Hrafnsson and Sarah Harrison and director of Julian Assange's legal team Baltasar Garzon address the media at Geneva Press Club. Photo: Reuters

WikiLeaks is fighting back after revelations Google handed over the emails and electronic data of the whistleblowing website's senior staff to the US authorities without providing notification until almost three years later.

Google was apparently acting in response to warrants issued by the US Department of Justice, which is investigating WikiLeaks for publishing hundreds of thousands of classified military and diplomatic files.

"Today, WikiLeaks' lawyers have written to Google and the US Department of Justice concerning a serious violation of the privacy and journalistic rights of WikiLeaks' staff," the site said in a statement.

Wikileaks is reportedly looking at legal action against both Google and the US government.

Advertisement

"Any information that would be used from the taking of documents [this way] will be considered as biased, illegal and will cancel the whole proceedings," saidJulian Assange's lawyer Baltasar Garzn, as reported by The Guardian.

""I'm not sure what craziness what desperation went into the US to make them behave this way, but this is ... a clear violation of rights."

WikiLeaks said the allegations against it point to a far broader investigation into its activities than the US authorities have previously indicated.

Alleged offences range from espionage to theft of US government property and computer fraud and abuse, it said.

See the original post:
WikiLeaks ponders legal action against Google, US after 'privacy violation'