Snowden, PRISM fallout will cost U.S. tech vendors $47 billion, less than expected

Summary:Forrester Research said the revenue hit to U.S. cloud and outsourcing providers is less than initial projections because international customers upped security instead of leaving.

Spying by the National Security Agency will cost cloud and outsourcing providers about $47 billion in revenue over the next three years, but that sum is better-than-expected, according to a Forrester Research analysis.

IT Security in the Snowden Era

The Edward Snowden revelations have rocked governments, global businesses, and the technology world. Here is our perspective on the still-unfolding implications along with IT security and risk management best practices that technology leaders can put to good use.

In 2013 and 2014, the NSA's PRISM program, a massive Internet spying operation, was outed by Edward Snowden. As reports continually surfaced about the NSA's programs, large tech vendors began to see a hit. Officially, the NSA wasn't blamed, but multiple U.S. tech giants noted business tanked in China and other key markets.

It's official: NSA spying is hurting the US tech economy

What Forrester found is that the PRISM program has hurt U.S. cloud providers, but traditional outsources are taking the biggest hit. For instance, cloud providers will lose about $500 million in revenue between 2014 and 2016. Most international companies have stuck with U.S. providers, but are taking control of security and encryption, said Forrester analyst Ed Ferrara in a report.

Forrester's report noted:

The biggest difference between initial worst-case projections in 2013 of revenue loss of $180 billion and the current $47 billion projection is that customers took encryption into their own hands, said Forrester.

Excerpt from:
Snowden, PRISM fallout will cost U.S. tech vendors $47 billion, less than expected

Federal Government websites have poor levels of encryption, independent audit finds

The vast majority of Federal Government websites have poor levels of encryption, putting the private details of taxpayers at risk, an independent audit finds.

An audit of the websites by two independent systems administrators found only four government websites out of more than 850 fully protected visitor communications.

The results have surprised other internet security experts who said the Government needed to beef up their levels of encryption.

Last year, while standing in Australia's new cyber security centre in Canberra, Prime Minister Tony Abbott announced Australia's internet security policies would be put under scrutiny.

The cyber security centre had been announced the year before by former prime minister Julia Gillard, who promised a "world class" facility to tackle a growing overseas cyber threat.

But it appears not all cyber issues are being looked at, as the two system administrators found when they reviewed the encryption capabilities of Federal Government websites.

After retrieving a list of more than 850 government domains via a Freedom of Information request, the pair scanned and reviewed the security of each of those websites.

They were looking for the basics, such as whether the site encrypted communications between the server and the user, similar to the way Twitter, Facebook or banks do.

And if they did provide encryption, the pair wanted to know if the sites used the latest software to protect against vulnerabilities or known weak encryption ciphers.

"Ninety per cent of the sites had no security at all," Ashley Hull, one of the those behind the security scan said.

Continued here:
Federal Government websites have poor levels of encryption, independent audit finds

New Firefox version says “might as well” to encrypting all Web traffic

Developers of the Firefox browser have moved one step closer to an Internet that encrypts all the world's traffic with a new feature that can cryptographically protect connections even when servers don't support the HTTPS protocol.

OE, as opportunistic encryption is often abbreviated, was turned on by default in Firefox 37, which was released this week. The move comes 17 months after an Internet Engineering Task Force working group proposed OE become an official part of the HTTP 2.0 specification. The move garnered critics and supporters alike, with the former arguing it may delay some sites from using the more secure HTTPS protections and the latter saying, in effect, some protection is better than none. The chief shortcoming of OE is its lack of authentication for cryptographically validating that a connected server is operated by the organization claiming ownership.

In a recent blog post, Mozilla developer Patrick McManus laid out some of the thinking and technical details behind the move to support HTTP 2 in Firefox:

OE provides unauthenticated encryption over TLS for data that would otherwise be carried via clear text. This creates some confidentiality in the face of passive eavesdropping and also provides you much better integrity protection for your data than raw TCP does when dealing with random network noise. The server setup for it is trivial.

These are indeed nice bonuses for http:// - but it still isn't as nice as https://. If you can run https you should - full stop. Don't make me repeat it 🙂 Only https protects you from active man in the middle attackers.

But if you have long tail of legacy content that you cannot yet get migrated to https, commonly due to mixed-content rules and interactions with third parties, OE provides a mechanism for an encrypted transport of http:// data. That's a strict improvement over the cleartext alternative.

Two simple steps to configure a server for OE

When the browser consumes that response header it will start to verify the fact that there is a HTTP/2 service on port 443. When a session with that port is established it will start routing the requests it would normally send in cleartext to port 80 onto port 443 with encryption instead. There will be no delay in responsiveness because the new connection is fully established in the background before being used. If the alternative service (port 443) becomes unavailable or cannot be verified Firefox will automatically return to using cleartext on port 80. Clients that don't speak the right protocols just ignore the header and continue to use port 80.

This mapping is saved and used in the future. It is important to understand that while the transaction is being routed to a different port the origin of the resource hasn't changed (i.e. if the cleartext origin was http://www.example.com:80 then the origin, including the http scheme and the port 80, are unchanged even if it routed to port 443 over TLS). OE is not available with HTTP/1 servers because that protocol does not carry the scheme as part of each transaction which is a necessary ingredient for the Alt-Svc approach.

McManus may be overstating the ease many site operators will have in supporting OE. At the moment, implementing HTTP 2 is anything but trivial, mainly because popular Web servers such as Apache and nginx don't yet ship with HTTP 2 support. Still, Mozilla's overture is a start. In February, McManus said nine percent of all Firefox release channel HTTP transactions were already happening over HTTP 2, as users with Firefox 35 or 36 beta connected to sites, such as Google and Twitter, that had implemented the updated protocol. Now that Mozilla offers fuller support in version 37, OE could gain wider use.

See more here:
New Firefox version says “might as well” to encrypting all Web traffic

Wellington hosts NZ Open Source Conference

Wellington will be on the world stage on the 16th and 17th of April when it plays host to a collaboration between open source developers, democracy activists, government officials and digital tech heavyweights at the Open Source // Open Society (OS//OS) conference.

Building on the success of open source software in powering the growth of the internet OS//OS will explore developments in open government, open education, open data, and open business.

Alongside key international tech player, Github, the Wellington City Council is a major sponsor behind the event. Grow Wellington is another key backer and has played a crucial role in galvanising support for the conference.

The Enspiral based event organisers have been successful in bringing the worlds biggest repository of open source code to Wellington to co-host the event with Wellington based startups Loomio and Chalkle.

The world leading line up of speakers, from Brandon Keepers, head of open source at GitHub, Sascha Meinrath Founder at the Open Technology Institute, to Keitha Booth from the NZ Open Government Data Programme will shine new light on the question What is Open?"

"To have GitHub co-host their first conference outside of the US in Wellington is a strong endorsement of our tech capability. Open source approaches align well with the collaborative nature of the tech community here. Wellington companies like Catalyst IT, Silverstripe and Loomio have achieved international success using innovative open source models," says Gerard Quinn, Grow Wellingtons CEO.

Nicole Williams from Silverstripe New Zealand, based in Wellington and a sponsor of the event, says "Im keen to know what is possible when public and private sector teams view web development as open by default."

Open source development is based on the ideas of mass collaboration, transparency and meaningful participation and its principles are becoming increasingly important in all spheres of society.

Founder of Wiki New Zealand, Lillian Grace says, "Wiki New Zealand has benefited greatly from open source tools and so we are keen to be a part of and contribute back to the community that enabled us.

She adds, "Data is a language that empowers and emboldens, it allows people to participate in conversations and decision-making processes."

Read the rest here:
Wellington hosts NZ Open Source Conference

5 reasons we said YES to the first Open Source//Open Society

For two days in April, Wellington will be home to some of the biggest influencers in open source development and open society thinking. Building on the success of open source software in powering the growth of the internet Open Source // Open Society will explore developments in open government, open innovation, open education, open data, and open business.

We couldnt miss the opportunity to get involved so are sponsoring the first ever Open Source // Open Society (OS//OS) conference on the 16th and 17th April 2015. Heres just 5 of the reasons why we jumped at supporting OS//OS:

1. We love open source!

We believe in, and have experienced firsthand, the power of an open developer community. The best way to encourage and create better software is to have people contribute back to the main code base and share their work with others.

In November 2006, we released the SilverStripe CMS as a free, open source download, followed by the SilverStripe Framework in 2012. Open sourcing our software has been a far bigger success than we could have imagined. The global interest in SilverStripe the company, and SilverStripe the product has been astounding. We have seen strong growth in adoption of our software around the globe. In addition, many of our own customers are now developing unique and novel solutions on top of SilverStripe and are integrating our software deep into their own product offerings. These projects in turn feed back into the open source project to help drive innovation further.

2. We want Wellingtons vibrant open source community to keep growing

We think Wellington is a pretty cool place to live and work! Were proud to be part of the vibrant open source community that calls Wellington home, many of whom have jumped on board as fellow sponsors. Plus being the hub for NZ government creates huge opportunities for the local open source community to create value for our society as a whole. So its fitting that the first ever Open Source // Open Society conference will take place in Wellington. OS//OS is the perfect showcase for what is possible with an open approach to coding, data and democracy and were excited to see what comes out of the two days.

3. We want to help the government open source everything!

The amount that government invests in online channels is significant DIA conservatively estimates spending at least $40 million each year. However, website developments are usually treated as a one-off project, requiring unnecessary reinvestment in design, development, procurement and security. The functional requirements of most government websites are similar, yet agencies rarely leverage investments already made in technology components, designs and contracts.

From our involvement in the Common Web Platform weve seen how open source and open data can help the public sector deliver better solutions while saving taxpayer money. Greater sharing of code by government agencies and local councils means less money wasted on code that is replicated or poorly maintained. Were hopeful that the public sector will support OS//OS and use it as an opportunity to come together to shape the future of open source in government.

The rest is here:
5 reasons we said YES to the first Open Source//Open Society

Julian Assange’s father home sold

There's a touch of the George Lucas lurking inside many home owners, and their home cinemas are something to be screen, sorry seen.

JULIAN Assange may have the worlds secrets at his fingertips but theres no hiding the fact his father didnt get the original asking price on his Newtown home.

John Shipton, father of the Wikileaks founder, sold the two-bedroom property at 36 Kent St for $1.42 million, below the asking price of more than $1.5 million.

The unassuming exterior of the Newtown property. Source: Supplied

The interiors of the Kent St home which is owned Julian Assanges biological father John Shipton and his partner Catherine Barber. Picture: Supplied Source: Supplied

ASSANGES NEWTOWN HOME FAILS TO SELL AT AUCTION

Despite a large crowd and eight registered bidders at the auction two weeks ago, the 247sq m property passed in at $1.27 million.

Julian Assange's father John Shipton. Picture: Adam Knott Source: News Limited

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Picture: Ella Pellegrini Source: News Limited

Speaking to the Daily Telegraph after the auction, Mr Stoker said Mr Shipton and his long-term partner, Catherine Barber, were very attached to the home after two decades at the address.

Read more:
Julian Assange’s father home sold

Assange’s father sells in Newtown

Real Estate News

The Newtown home of Julian Assange's dad John Shipton sold on Wednesday for $1.42 million.

It was a strong result for the quirky two-bedroom property, selling for well in excess of the $1.1 million-plus guide.

The two-bedroom house last traded in 1989 for $130,000 when bought by Shipton's partner Catherine Barber, and was largely rebuilt by Shipton in the 1990s.

Shipton is the founder of the WikiLeaks Party, formed as part of Julian Assange's bid for a Senate seat in the 2013 federal election.

Advertisement

Assange remains holed up inside the Ecuadorean Embassy in London since June 2012 following British moves to extradite him to Sweden to face questioning over a sexual assault investigation.

Set on a corner block the original house was built in the 1870s as a servant's quarters to the historic Victorian villa Ferndale next door. it was sold by Shaun Stoker and Ercan Ersan, of Ray White Surry Hills.

Link:
Assange's father sells in Newtown

Ripple, a Cryptocurrency Company, Wants to Rewire Bank Authentication

A digital-currency company thinks it can protect the personal information used to perform identity checks in the financial industry.

Companies built around Bitcoin and other digital currencies mostly focus on storing and transferring money. But at least one company is trying to prove that some of the underlying technology can have a much wider impact on the financial industry.

That startup, Ripple Labs, has already had some success persuading banks to use its Bitcoin-inspired protocol to speed up money transfers made in any currency, especially across borders (see 50 Smartest Companies 2014: Ripple Labs). Now it is building a system that uses some similar cryptographic tricks to improve the way financial companies check the identity of their customers. The system could also provide a more secure way to log in to other online services.

Verifying identity is a constant, expensive headache for financial institutions, which are bound by strict regulations designed to curtail money laundering and support for blacklisted organizations such as terrorist groups. Most banks turn to one of a handful of large data brokers, such as Experian or Acxiom, to power their ID checks. When you open a new account, a bank gathers key personal information and sends it to its broker to verify your identity, and to confirm that you arent on any block list.

Under Ripples system, the same basic process would take place. However, your personal information would be used to generate a unique cryptographic token. A bank could send the token to a data broker that has its own token, made using your personal information at an earlier time. The math underpinning Ripples system would allow the broker to confirm that the data you had given the bank was correct, without either the bank or the broker ever revealing the data itself.

Apples mobile payment technology uses similar technology to protect credit card numbers (see 10 Breakthrough Technologies 2015: Apple Pay). When you use Apple Pay, only a cryptographic token representing your credit card number is transferred to the merchant. That token can be used to charge your card, but it wont reveal anything to anyone who manages to steal it, and it cannot be reused.

Stefan Thomas, chief technology officer of Ripple, says its ID verification system should reduce the risk that personal data will be stolen or accidentally leaked and should also be faster than the systems used today, which have developed gradually over decades and still use outdated technology. He says Ripple decided to develop the technology after it became clear that the financial system needed more than just new ways to transfer money.

Thomas adds that by cutting costs and security risks, Ripples system might allow cheaper data brokers to emerge. It could also make it easier for banks to operate in poorer parts of the world, where verification systems can be particularly expensive to operate, even for U.S. banks, he says. And Ripples engineers are also working on ways their protocol can be used to log in to online services.

Sarah Jane Hughes, a law professor at Indiana University who specializes in payment systems, says Ripple has identified a legitimate opportunity. Companies spend a lot on complying with identity verification rules, and mistakes are expensive, she says. For example, PayPal agreed to pay $7.7 million to the U.S. Treasury last week for failing to block just under 500 transactions involving people subject to U.S. sanctions. If you could do verification more rapidly and with a greater degree of certainty, it would be hugely valuable, says Hughes.

However, Hughes says, switching to a new system would not be easy for most financial institutions. They would probably have to retain the old system for some time for compatibility reasons. That means Ripples idea would have to deliver significant benefits to gain traction.

View original post here:
Ripple, a Cryptocurrency Company, Wants to Rewire Bank Authentication

Mexican ‘WikiLeaks’ already making waves

MEXICO CITY: Mexicos WikiLeaks-inspired whistleblower website is already making waves just days after its launch, even though it has yet to expose any government scandals. MexicoLeaks was announced by star journalist Carmen Aristegui last week when she told her audience that her MVS radio team was part of the initiative. The website uses encryption software to encourage would-be whistleblowers, who would normally fear retaliation, to anonymously send documents to an alliance of news outlets and civic groups in order to expose corruption in a country plagued by graft. While MexicoLeaks has only begun to receive documents, it was Aristeguis seemingly benign announcement that snowballed into a scandal. MVS distanced itself from MexicoLeaks and fired two journalists before sacking Aristegui on Sunday, sparking accusations that one of the voices most critical of the government was being muzzled. Aristegui, 51, revealed last year that President Enrique Pena Nietos wife had bought a mansion from a government contractor, raising conflict of interest allegations, which the government rejected. Calling her dismissal an attack on freedom of speech, Aristegui suggested that her firing was planned by someone with much power. She said her team was investigating the finance minister and the army when they were fired. MVS has denied coming under pressure from the government or seeking to silence Aristegui. The company says it fired the first two journalists for using the stations name without authorization to promote MexicoLeaks, and that Aristegui was let go because she gave an ultimatum for them to be reinstated. The problem is the use of our brand. We have no problem with MexicoLeaks, MVS communications vice president Felipe Chao told AFP. MVS does not give up or fold before governments. There is nothing that could get in conflict with freedom of speech, Chao said. He said the company first heard of MexicoLeaks when Aristegui announced it on the air, and she was unlikely to be reinstated. The government issued a statement Tuesday saying it hoped Aristegui and MVS resolve their dispute, while stating that it has constantly respected and valued the work of journalists. While Aristegui and MVS feud, MexicoLeaks is quietly amassing documents through its secure website. The alliance of eight civic groups and news outlets, including national weekly magazine Proceso, website Animal Politico and Aristeguis team, issued a statement denying it was misusing MVSs brand. We regret that MVSs decision is based on the (Aristegui) editorial teams participation in the MexicoLeaks alliance, as if the democratic values that inspire this platform including freedom of speech, right of information, transparency and accountability trouble this company or affects its interests, the statement said. Discussions to create MexicoLeaks began last year, with the help of Free Press Unlimited, a Dutch-based foundation that helps journalists in conflict zones. A person with secrets to spill must download a special web browser named Tor, which hides their location, to be able to send them through MexicoLeaks without being detected. The whistleblower can choose to send the documents to one or more of the eight members of the alliance. The organizations then launch investigations to verify the information before deciding to publish anything. Eduard Martin-Borregon, a member of the Poder civic group that participates in MexicoLeaks, said his pro-transparency organization is already investigating tips it has received since last week. With MexicoLeaks secure filter system, we hope that many acts of corruption of human rights violations that occur in Mexico but are not exposed because people are afraid of reprisals can be published by the press and prosecuted, he said. The 30-year-old Catalan refused to give any details about the documents. But, he said, I think we wont have to wait too long for the first leak.

Read the original:
Mexican ‘WikiLeaks’ already making waves