What Are Smart Contracts? Cryptocurrency’s Killer App …

This article contains interviews with Phil Raporport, drector of markets and trading at Ripple Labs, Stefan Thomas, CTO at Ripple Labs, and Chris Ellis, a cofounder of Feathercoin and show host with World Crypto Network.

What if you could cut your mortgage rate, make it easier to update your will, and ensure that your buddy was never able to weasel out of paying up on a bet? That and much more is the promise of smart contracts, a technology that is getting closer and closer to reality thanks to cryptocurrency.

Smart contracts are computer programs that can automatically execute the terms of a contract. Someday, these programs may replace lawyers and banks for handling certain common financial transactions.

And the potential for smart contracts goes way beyond simple transfers of funds. The door of a car or a house could be unlocked by connecting smart contracts to the Internet of everything. But as always with this cutting edge of financial technology, major questions abound: How will this all align with our current legal system? And, of course, will anyone actually use these things anyway?

The idea of smart contracts goes way back to 1994, nearly the dawn of the World Wide Web itself. That's when Nick Szabo, a cryptographer widely credited with laying the groundwork for bitcoin, first coined the term "smart contract." At core, these automated contracts work like any other computer program's if-then statements. They just happen to be doing it in a way that interacts with real-world assets. When a pre-programmed condition is triggered, the smart contract executes the corresponding contractual clause.

Szabo's original theories about how these contracts could work remained unrealized because there was no digitally native financial system that could support programmable transactions. (It defeats the purpose of smart contracts if a bank still has to manually authorize the release and transfer of money.) "One big hurdle to smart contracts is that computer programs can't really trigger payments right now," says Phil Rapoport, Ripple Labs' director of markets and trading.

The advent and increasingly widespread adoption of bitcoin is changing that, and as a result Szabo's idea has seen a revival. Smart contract technology is now being built on top of bitcoin and other virtual currencieswhat some have termed "Bitcoin 2.0" platforms. Because bitcoin is itself is a computer program, smart contracts can speak to it just like they would any other piece of code. The puzzle pieces are falling into place. A computer program can now trigger payments.

There are currently two major open source projects working on smart contracts, both of which have taken big leaps forward this year. One is called Codius and the other is Ethereum. Codius was developed by Ripple Labs, which also created its own digital currency called Ripple. Codius aims to be interoperable between a variety of cryptocurrency, such as Ripple and bitcoin, although it is managed by the private company.

"Codius can interact with other ledgers and web services. It can work on bitcoin and it can work on any other system," says Stefan Thomas, Ripple's CTO.

In contrast, Ethereum is an entirely new currency with smart contracts baked into its payment system. Originally developed by 20-year-old programmer Vitalik Buterin, it would replace other "coins" like bitcoin, but appears to be more of a community project.

Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are poised to help smart contracts become reality. But the effect may also be reciprocal. Smart contracts can illustrate a unique benefit of virtual currencies that some advocates think could entice more users.

"Smart contracts are really the killer app of the cryptocurrency world," says Chris Ellis, host of a show about cryptocurrencies on the World Crypto Network.

Let's take a simple example, like a Super Bowl bet. Say you want to bet $500or roughly one bitcointhat the Patriots will win, while your friend is betting the same amount that the Packers will take the title. Step one is for you and your friend to place your bitcoin in a neutral account controlled by the smart contract. When the game is over and the smart contract is able to verify via ESPN, Reuters, or elsewhere that the Patriots beat the Packers, the smart contract would automatically deposit your bet and your winnings from your friend back into your account.

Because smart contracts are computer programs, it would be trivial to add more complex betting elements like odds and score differentials into the mix. While there are services out there today that might handle this sort of transaction, they all charge a fee. The key difference with smart contracts is that it is a decentralized system accessible to anyone, that doesn't require any intermediary party.

A more everyday example would be online shopping. "If you order something online you might not want to pay a merchant immediately until they fulfill their end of the bargain," says Rapoport. "So you could easily have a contract that looks for FedEx tracking data saying that the package you ordered has been delivered to your address before releasing payment to the sender."

If you think about a lot of routine financial transactions, what lawyers and banks do boils down to repetitively processing mundane tasks. And yet we still have to shell out huge fees for lawyers to go through wills or for banks to process our mortgage payments.

Smart contracts could automate and demystify these processes, making it so that ordinary people can save time and money.

Although you got your mortgage through a bank, that bank won't generally hold onto it for the entire 30-year loan; it will be sold to an investor. But you keep making payments to the bank, not the investor that owns your mortgage. The bank just becomes a processor for your monthly payments, sending a chunk to the investor, a slice to taxes, and a bit for homeowner's insurance.

"That's just a real simple operational task, but that bank will often take a quarter to a half percent per year to service that mortgage," says Rapoport. "They're just doing an operational headache of receiving payments and redirecting them. And they're charging people for that. But it's something that a smart contract could theoretically administer very easily."

If mortgage payments were handled by smart contracts, mortgage processing fees could be eliminated and that savings passed on to consumers. The result would be a lowered cost of home ownership.

Although smart contracts are still in their nascent stage, the potential is clear. If a simple enough user interface were developed it could remove a host of legal headaches, like updating your will. Imagine if allocating your assets after your death was as simple as moving an adjustable slider that determines who gets how much. Just like with the bet or FedEx example, once the smart contract can verify the triggering conditionin this case, your deaththe contract goes into effect and your assets are divvied up.

With all this, it may sound like we won't need lawyers anymore. But enthusiasts say that smart contracts should be seen as an evolution of the legal system, not its erasure.

"We don't think that this will replace the legal system as much as provide an intermediate layer between transacting and going to court," says Thomas.

Nonetheless, the role of lawyers might look very different in the future. Rather than having lawyers adjudicate individual contracts, the role of lawyers might shift to producing smart contract templates on a competitive market. Contract selling points would be their quality, how customizable they are, and their ease of use. It sounds a bit like the marketplace for WordPress themes.

"I imagine a lot of people will create contracts that do different things," says Rapoport. "And they can essentially sell them for others to use. So if you make, for example, a really good equity agreement that has a bunch of different functionality a company can charge for access to their contract."

It's easy to think about a smart contract managing a will, up to a point. It all makes sense if you can imagine yourself keeping all of your assets in bitcoin. But what if you live in the real world and have physical possessions like, you know, most of us? The answer is something called smart property.

"This starts to get more sci-fi when we talk about smart property," says Ellis.

The so-called "Internet of Things" is constantly growing, with more and more interconnected devices out there every day. Some forward-thinking developers are already working on ways to combine the Internet of Things with bitcoin infrastructure so that something like a bitcoin can actually represent a physical object. That token is what these developers call smart property.

But more important than representing some object, these new smart property tokens would actually grant ownership and control to a networked object, whether that be a computer, a car, or even a house.

How does this all come together?

Ellis gives the example of renting out his house. "Let's say all the locks are Internet-enabled and they've all got network connections. When you make a bitcoin transaction for the rent, the smart contract you and I agreed to automatically unlocks the house for you. You just go in using keys stored on your smartphone."

A smart contract would also make it trivial to set up dates when those digital keys would automatically expire. It sounds a bit like Airbnb without the need for Airbnb.

And if you think about it, that's the fundamental transformation smart contracts are after. A service like Airbnb is desirable because it obviates the need for the host and the guest to trust each otherthey both only need to trust Airbnb. If the guest doesn't pay up, or the host doesn't leave the keys, either of them can take it up with Airbnb.

Doing the same sublet with a smart contract would supplant a business model like Airbnb's. The homeowner and renter still don't need to trust each otherthey just need to trust the smart contract. Smart contracts would decentralize the model of who needs to be trusted. And in doing so, it would cut out hefty fees by brokering services like Airbnb.

But smart contracts don't have to just disrupt existing business models. They can also complement them. Way back in his '94 essay, Nick Szabo envisioned the idea of smart property writing that "smart property might be created by embedding smart contracts in physical objects." His example of choice was a car loan, writing that if you miss a car payment, the smart contract could automatically revoke your digital keys to operate the car. No doubt car dealerships would find this appealing.

Admittedly, at some point it does start to sound like the makings of a dystopian sci-fi film. If you can't make a payment all of a sudden your car could be digitally and remotely repossessed, all without any human interaction.

But in theory, the upside is that financial institutions should be more willing to take risks on people who might not otherwise get loans. Because, worst case scenario, if someone can't pay up, it's inconsequential for the bank to take back the asset in question.

In addition to expanding opportunities to get credit, smart contracts also have the potential to open up access to the legal system for disadvantaged people who might not otherwise be able to reap its benefits. Thomas believes that smart contracts "will make the legal system available to people who might not be able to afford it on their own."

Although the law in theory treats everyone equally, you more often than not need money to take someone to court over a breach of contract.

"At present justice really only works if you can afford a lawyer to enforce that agreement. So once smart contracts have the ability to enforce agreements on their own it will be game-changing. " says Ellis.

Of course it may not play out that cleanly in reality. While this all sounds good and noble in theory, it's impossible to predict how a smart contract would hold up in court if it were ever challenged. Dethroning lawyers as the high priests of arbitrating contracts is certainly appealing. But do we run the risk of just replacing literacy in legalese with literacy in code?

Rapoport acknowledges that there may be drawbacks. "Everyone reads English, so in some ways it's easier to read a traditional contract. But this is still very bleeding-edge technology, so who knows what kinds of user-facing improvements will be made eventually?"

Despite unforeseen pitfalls, the promise of smart contracts is clear. Right now we're waiting to see if either Ethereum or Ripple's Codius will be able to become usable and really take off.

"Right now there are lot of clever people working on this who are high on ideas because they can see the potential," says Ellis "What we don't know yet is who is going to win this raceRipple or Ethereum. It's a bit like VHS vs. Betamax."

See more here:
What Are Smart Contracts? Cryptocurrency's Killer App ...

A Complete Guide for CryptoCurrency Investors & Traders …

There's so much noise, so much chatter, so much conflicting information out there about the world of digital currency. Even people who are used to investing can find their heads spinning as they try to sort out all the information they're bombarded with about cryptocurrency. And if you're new to investing, wellit can be downright confusing and intimidating. If only there was an unbiased source of clear information a potential investor could really use, a place to sort the facts from all that noise.

Look no further, folks; you're there.

Coin Pursuit was created with one goal in mind: to help the alternative currency investor navigate the minefield of information that's swirling around this new and robust industry. We're investors ourselves, and we discovered early on just how difficult it was to find straightforward info about even the basics of investing. The facts are out there, but they're scattered all over the Internetand they're often drowned out by people with skin in the game who have agendas and products to market. We realized the average investor doesn't have hours and hours of spare time to scour the web for the facts they need. We also saw the need for a comprehensive and thoroughly-researched site that could be bookmarked and referred to by both the new and experienced investor alike.

From this perceived need, Coin Pursuit was born. We'll be doing thorough research, and will sort out the facts from the rumors. The information we find will be put into clear and easy-to understand language, and will be passed along to you. We'll cover the full spectrum of the cryptocurrency industry, from its basic concepts to its most current trends. Here, you'll also find links and details about all the resources you'll ever need to make your investment experience enjoyable andhopefullyprofitable.

There's also another way we're helping traders cut down on the noise and distractions they often find online, and that's our exclusive and interactive SliceFeeds portal. Those of you who use Twitter or Facebook, or try to sort through the content on forums or sites like Reddit, know it can take a lot of time as you try to locate a specific piece of information, or connect with one person directly. SliceFeeds eliminates all that hassle by concentrating all your contacts and cryptocurrency information in one place. Its network is divided into three easy-to-use sections: the network page shows statistics at a glance; the feeds page displays updates as they happen; and your profile page allows you to customize your own personal network-within-the-network. Members will also be able to monetize their unique contributions to the community; for example, bloggers can offer subscriptions (payable in digital currency, of course) for access to their exclusive content, and merchants will be able to advertise their companies and products through SliceFeeds, as well. With SliceFeeds, the days of sorting through dozens of unrelated tweets and forum posts are over; you'll be able to find the digital currency info you need, when you need it.

It's our mission to be the most expansive and expanding resource for digital currency information. And that means fresh information, so stop by often; we're constantly updating our content. So, if you've just got a casual interest in alternative currencies, or you're a hardcore investoror if you fall anywhere in betweenCoin Pursuit will be your trusted resource.

See the original post:
A Complete Guide for CryptoCurrency Investors & Traders ...

Definition of Cryptocurrency | Coin Pursuit

What exactly is cryptocurrency, how did it get its name, and how is it coded? Take a look at Coin Pursuit's plain-English definition of the term.

When you see the word root crypto in the English language, it comes from the Greek, meaning hidden or private. From it, we get words like encryption and decryption, which relate to the coding of a message, and its decoding once it's received. Even the English word cryptwhich uses the Greek root in its purest formrefers to a private hiding place, a sanctuary for the remains of a loved one.

Cryptocurrency, then, means money that is made hidden and privateand therefore secureby means of encryption, or coding. All aspects of cryptocurrency are protected by long and complicated blocks of code, each of which is unique to the item or person it's protecting. As an investor, or someone taking part in a transaction, you're identified by a one-of-a-kind code, as is the person or company with whom you're doing business. Each coin of cryptocurrency itself has its own code, and smaller denominations have their own, as well, depending on what amount is needed for a transaction. Finally, the transaction itself is identified with its own code. Layer upon layer of encryption is one of the things that makes cryptocurrency unique, secure and anonymous, if you so choose. And all that coding and concealment is what gives cryptocurrency its apt name.

As is true in any technical field, the industry of cryptocurrency not only has its unique jargon, but often terms that have synonyms that are used interchangeably. Therefore, we'd like to clear the air on that specific point right here: when you see the terms digital currency or alternative currency hereor in any other source, for that matterthose are just additional terms for cryptocurrency. As a matter of fact, you'll more than likely see digital currency used more often, as it has a less-technical and more user-friendly feel to it.

Next Introductory Topic: Cryptocurrency Origins

View original post here:
Definition of Cryptocurrency | Coin Pursuit

Edward Snowden Dismisses FBI Claim in Apple iPhone Battle

Edward Snowden is weighing in again on the FBIs claim that only Apple can unlock an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters.

Respectfully, thats horsest, Snowden said at the Blueprint for Democracy Conference organized by Common Cause, The Hill reports. The former government contractor, who infamously leaked National Security Agency documents and now lives in Russia to avoid charges, appeared via Google hangout and said the FBI has known of methods since the 90s that would allow it to access to the information its seeking.

FBI investigators have asked Apple to unlock the encrypted iPhone of Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the shooters in the attack that killed 14 people in San Bernardino, Calif., in December. Apple has said that providing the government with such means would make other iPhones vulnerable and is fighting a federal magistrates order to assist the FBI.

The global technological consensus is against the FBI, Snowden followed up on Twitter later, linking to an ACLU post that claims the FBI can easily work around existing iPhone security measures.

[The Hill]

Read more here:
Edward Snowden Dismisses FBI Claim in Apple iPhone Battle

Cryptocurrency Analytic Company: Arbitrage – Bitcoinist.net

We started early stage testing on our system around November of 2013. During the period of November to January our company took on about five clients for our Alpha period. After a successful alpha period, we incorporated in early January as a Delaware C corporation. We then began our beta period, where we have been open to clients for services.Since then we have added 10 more clients, and continue taking on about one client every week or two weeks. We began with one market pair(bitstamp vs btc-e using BTC) and have since expanded our selection of markets to four, with each pair able to connect to each of the other exchanges ( ie bitstamp vs bitfinex, bitstamp vs kraken, ect).

Allow me to answer number 3, which will take care of the Ponzi scheme question. Suffice to say we are MUCH different than any other tradingpool or fund that directly takes BTC from their clients.

Our system was designed by myself to get around a few problems that exist in the field of Bitcoin proprietary trading:

Here is how we address all of those concerns:

The risk factors are holding your BTC or LTC on an exchnage, whichshould be profiled before trusting them. The second risk factor isholding BTC as 50% of your portfolio, which may change in price to thedownside, but may also change in price to the upside. Our trading itselfintroduces no risk as when it buys 1 BTC it also sells 1 BTC. For amarket neutral position. If our models are very off during trading wemay lose money to exchange fees, but our system is designed so that thishas never happened, and foreseeable will never happen.

We are able to consistently execute this strategy because once anaccount is set up we are 100% automatic. Our system is well tested andhas an excellent tech team backing it for great up-time.

Currently we are operational, are taking new clients, and have fourmarket open for trade including Bitstamp, Bitfinex, Btce, and the newlyintroduced Kraken. In our older markets pairs in BTC we have beenshowing between 2-4 % a month from the USD deposited. Our newestaddition has been the same trade in LTC and it has blown by expectationsreturning over 8% in its first month of operations.

Our future development plans include an event that should behappening very soon. We hope to introduce a full client log-in, withpersonalized returns displayed with live data. This already under heavydevelopment and should be released at the end of July. For people interested, you many want to know a minimum of $5000 is required per account. Also, they charge a fee of 20% monthly which is payable via USD or Bitcoin. Do note during their trial period its only 15%.

For more information visit :https://www.cryptocurrencyanalytics.com/Photo Source: Bing Images

Go here to see the original:
Cryptocurrency Analytic Company: Arbitrage - Bitcoinist.net

Only One Presidential Candidate Supports Edward Snowden, And …

Unlike the Green Partys Jill Stein, not one Republican or Democratic nominee has voiced any support for the NSA whistleblower or shown any willingness to allow him to return to the U.S. as a free man.

Despite Snowdens important revelations about the NSAs illegal surveillance of U.S. citizens, not one major presidential candidate has been willing to voice his or her support for him. (Photo: Tony Webster/CC)

WASHINGTON No matter who wins the 2016 election, the United States will likely continue its efforts to capture and prosecute National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Despite the important revelations that Snowden shared with the world about the NSAs illegal surveillance of every U.S. citizen as well as world leaders and foreign nationals, not one major presidential candidate has been willing to voice his or her support for Snowdens actions or express any willingness to allow him to return to the U.S. as a free man.

Green Party candidate Jill Stein is the lone exception. She called Snowden a hero in a July 2015 interview with Ontheissues.org, a website which compiles candidates political views.

Despite his campaign positioning the senator from Vermont as an outsider, Sanders views on the whistleblower are decidedly mainstream. At the Oct. 14 Democratic debate, Sanders praised Snowden for his important role in educating the American public, but added: He did break the law, and I think there should be a penalty to that.

At the same debate, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton strongly criticized Snowden, saying he should have invoked all of the protections of being a whistleblower instead of taking his revelations to the media. John Cassidy, a staff writer for The New Yorker, reported that Clinton was referring to the 1998 Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act. In 2013, Cassidy noted, the ACLUs senior policy counsel, Michael German, referred to the act as no more than a trap designed to send whistleblowers like Snowden to jail if they act on their conscience.

Watch Democratic presendtial candidates debate theUS Patriot Act, NSA, and Snowden:

This guys a bad guy. There is still a thing called execution. -Donald Trump

Also in 2013, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas expressed his cautious support for Snowden, telling conservative media outlet The Blaze, If it is the case that the federal government is seizing millions of personal records about law-abiding citizens then I think Mr. Snowden has done a considerable public service by bringing it to light. However, under pressure from other candidates, Cruz abruptly changed his position early this year. It is now clear that Snowden is a traitor, and he should be tried for treason, he said on Jan. 13, adding that, his actions materially aided terrorists and enemies of the United States a statement almost identical to similar ones made by Clinton and other current or former White House officials.

Likewise, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida accused Snowden of treason in 2013 and echoed those sentiments at the Jan. 14 debate, and in June 2015, Ohio Gov. John Kasich also called the whistleblower a traitor while simultaneously praising the Snowden-inspired NSA reform efforts of Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky.

While the demand that Snowden return home to face trial may seem like a reasonable one, many analysts have agreed with Kevin Zeese, an activist and political organizer from Popular Resistance, who wrote in 2014 for Truthout that Snowden would be prosecuted in a phony Kangaroo court where the deck would be stacked against him and the process would be unfair.

The idea that Snowdens leaks aided terrorists has also been widely debunked. A 2014 report from global intelligence analysts at Flashpoint noted: Well prior to Edward Snowden, online jihadists were already aware that law enforcement and intelligence agencies were attempting to monitor them.

On Oct. 15, 2015, Evan Greer, campaign director for Internet-advocacy group Fight For The Future, lamented in a Huffington Post editorial that Sanders stance on Snowden proves he doesnt want a revolution. And much of her characterization of Sanders response could easily apply to any candidate in the two major parties:

Instead of calling for stronger legal protections for whistleblowers, or offering to pardon Snowden if elected, [Sanders] called for the former NSA contractor to come home and face trial in a country with a dodgy record of imprisoning and prosecuting whistleblowers, dissidents, activists and journalists.

By contrast, Stein would like to see Snowden not just freed of facing legal charges, but hired by the U.S. government. She told OnTheIssues.org:

Charges should not be brought against him, and he should return with hero status he could improve our national security if he were working for us.

See the rest here:
Only One Presidential Candidate Supports Edward Snowden, And ...

Edward Snowden says FBI’s claim that only Apple can unlock an …

Edward Snowden, speaking via a video link at the Blueprint for a Great Democracy conference, held in Washington DC on March 8.

By Stan Schroeder2016-03-09 15:31:09 UTC

Chalk in another prominent name joining the FBI vs. Apple debate: Edward Snowden.

Commenting on the ongoing kerfuffle between the Cupertino giant and the U.S. government, in which Apple refuses to help the FBI unlock an iPhone belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters, Snowden called one of FBI's claims "horseshit."

Talking via video stream at the Common Causes Blueprint for a Great Democracy conference, which takes place in Washington, D.C., March 8-9, the NSA whistleblower mentioned the ongoing FBI vs. Apple case as a good example of a method to protect your data from government's reach that actually works. He then goes on to dispute one of FBI's key claims in the case.

The FBI says Apple has the exclusive technical means to get into this phone," said Snowden.Respectfully, thats horseshit.

You can hear Snowden's commentsfor yourself, if you can endure the poor audio quality, in the video below (at 30:05).

Snowden later commented on Twitter as well, providing one example of why he thinks the FBI's claim is incorrect. It's an article by ACLU Technology FellowDaniel Kahn Gillmor, arguing that the FBI can easily defeat the iPhone's auto-erase feature.

One of FBI's claims is that it cannot test passcodes on the iPhone as it could trigger Apple's auto-erase protection mechanism, which erases all the data on the phone after a number of failed passcode attempts. Gillmor, however, claims (and Snowden agrees) that the FBI could relatively easily desolder the flash memory chip from the iPhone's motherboard, copy its data and then later replace it in case the auto-erase feature kicks in.

We've seen other, more or less technically feasible proposals on how the FBI could defeat the iPhone's security without Apple's help. Most experts seem to agree that it's possible, but very difficult.

Snowden is the last in line of prominent figures in the IT community expressing their views on the legal battle between the FBI and Apple.Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, sided with Apple, as did Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, who recently called the entire case "lame."

Have something to add to this story? Share it in the comments.

Continue reading here:
Edward Snowden says FBI's claim that only Apple can unlock an ...

Edward Snowden and Pussy Riot fight Internet censorship on …

Image: Mashable Composite, Barton Gellman/The Washington Post/Getty Images, Rick Madonik/Toronto Star/Getty Images

To bring attention to the issues of censorship and Internet surveillance, Edward Snowden, Pussy Riot and Ai Weiwei are teaming up with AdBlock and Amnesty International to launch an online protest campaign. The campaign is starting Friday at 4 p.m., exclusively visible to AdBlock users, and will run through Saturday, March 12, coinciding with World Day against Cyber Censorship.

Amnesty International is an organization that campaigns against abuses of human rights including free speech. AdBlock is a Internet browser extension that removes advertisements from webpages.

All of the quotes in the campaign images are from people who have been silenced by governments around the world for one reason or another. In its release, Amnesty International wrote that governments are seeking more control over online content and are actively looking to increase means of surveillance and censorship.

One of the campaign ads that will show up to AdBlock users, featuring words from Pussy Riot.

Image: AdBlock/Amnesty International

In the last year, Denmark, Finland, France, the Netherlands, Pakistan, Poland and Switzerland have sought new intelligence bills that will increase their ability to spy on communications in these countries and beyond, Amnesty International wrote. China and Kuwait passed laws criminalising or restricting certain online expression.

The campaign also lines up with the recent Apple vs. FBI debates regarding the U.S. government wanting Apple to create a backdoor into iPhones to use in criminal and national security investigations. Amnesty International is urging Internet companies to side with security and privacy, and not succumb to government pressure to allow surveillance.

An ad featuring Ai Weiwei, a Chinese contemporary artist and activist.

Image: AdBlock/Amnesty International

The world was too lax about protecting privacy and free speech on the internet, Amnesty International secretary general Salil Shetty wrote. We now need a radically new approach to protecting online rights to fight back against government restrictions on online freedoms.

Have something to add to this story? Share it in the comments.

This article originally published at Space.com here

See the article here:
Edward Snowden and Pussy Riot fight Internet censorship on ...

Oliver Stone reveals clandestine meetings with Edward Snowden …

"We moved to Germany, because we did not feel comfortable in the U.S.," Stone said on March 6, speaking before an audience at the Sun Valley Film Festival in Idaho, in a Q&A moderated by The Hollywood Reporter's Stephen Galloway. "We felt like we were at risk here. We didn't know what the NSA might do, so we ended up in Munich, which was a beautiful experience."

Even there, problems arose with companies that had connections to the U.S., he said: "The American subsidiary says, 'You can't get involved with this; we don't want our name on it.' So BMW couldn't even help us in any way in Germany."

While in Sun Valley, the three-time Oscar winner held a private screening of "Snowden" for an invited audience of around two dozen. Those who attended the screening, at the former home of Ernest Hemingway, included actress Melissa Leo, who plays documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras.

Guests were required to sign non-disclosure agreements, but that did not prevent three of them from speaking to this reporter. All praised the work in progress. "What he did that's so brilliant is, he gave this kid's whole back story, so you really like him," said one audience member.

When Stone (whose films include "Platoon," "Born on the Fourth of July" and "Wall Street") was first approached to make the movie, he hesitated. He had been working on another controversial subject, about the last few years in the life of Martin Luther King Jr., and did not immediately wish to tackle something that incendiary again.

"Glenn Greenwald (the journalist who worked with Poitras to break the Snowden story) asked me some advice, and I just wanted to stay away from controversy," he said. "I didn't want this. Be that as it may, a couple of months later, the Russian lawyer for Snowden contacts me via my producer. The Russian lawyer told me to come to Russia and wanted me to meet him. One thing led to another, and basically I got hooked."

Joseph Gordon-Levitt talks meeting Edward Snowden: "He believed it was the right thing to do"

In Moscow, Stone met multiple times with Snowden, who has been living in exile in Russia since evading the U.S. government's attempts to arrest him for espionage. "He's articulate, smart, very much the same," he said. "I've been seeing him off and on for a year -- actually, more than that. I saw him last week or two weeks ago to show him the final film."

He added, "He is consistent: He believes so thoroughly in reform of the Internet that he has devoted himself to this cause. ... Because of the Russian hours, he stays up all night. He's a night owl, and he's always in touch (with the outside world), and he's working on some kind of constitution for the Internet with other people. So he's very busy.

"And he stays in that 70 percent-computer world. He's on another planet that way. His sense of humor has gotten bigger, his tolerance. He's not really in Russia in his mind -- he's in some planetary position up there. And Lindsay Mills, the woman he's loved for 10 years -- really, it's a serious affair -- has moved there to be with him."

Spending time with Snowden, and researching what happened to him, Stone said, "It's an amazing story. Here's a young man, 30 years old at that time, and he does something that's so powerful. Who at 30 years old would do that, sacrificing his life in that way? We met with him many times in Moscow, and we did a lot more research, and we went ahead." He added, "I think he's a historical figure of great consequence."

Joseph Gordon-Levitt to donate his 'Snowden' acting fee to ACLU project

Despite the director's involvement in the movie, which stars Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Snowden and Shailene Woodley as Mills, "No studio would support it," he said. "It was extremely difficult to finance, extremely difficult to cast. We were doing another one of these numbers I had done before, where pre-production is paid for by essentially the producer and myself, where you're living on a credit card."

Eventually, financing came through from France and Germany. "The contracts were signed, like eight days before we started," he noted. "It's a very strange thing to do (a story about) an American man, and not be able to finance this movie in America. And that's very disturbing, if you think about its implications on any subject that is not overtly pro-American.

"They say we have freedom of expression, but thought is financed, and thought is controlled, and the media is controlled. This country is very tight on that, and there's no criticism allowed at a certain level. You can make movies about civil rights leaders who are dead, but it's not easy to make one about a current man."

"Snowden" opens in the U.S. on September 16.

2015 The Hollywood Reporter. All rights reserved.

Link:
Oliver Stone reveals clandestine meetings with Edward Snowden ...

Snowden: FBI’s claim it can’t unlock the San Bernardino …

Edward Snowden, the whistleblower whose NSA revelations sparked a debate on mass surveillance, has waded into the arguments over the FBIs attempt to force Apple to help it unlock the iPhone 5C of one of the San Bernardino shooters.

Related: Is the FBI v Apple PR war even about encryption?

The FBI says that only Apple can deactivate certain passcode protections on the iPhone, which will allow law enforcement to guess the passcode by using brute-force.

Talking via video link from Moscow to the Common Cause Blueprint for a Great Democracy conference, Snowden said: The FBI says Apple has the exclusive technical means to unlock the phone. Respectfully, thats bullshit.

Snowden then went on to tweet his support for an American Civil Liberties Union report saying that the FBIs claims in the case are fraudulent.

Meanwhile, Microsoft founder Bill Gates said in a discussion on Reddit: I think there needs to be a discussion about when the government should be able to gather information. What if we had never had wiretapping? Also the government needs to talk openly about safeguards.

Gates refused to be drawn on one side or the other of the debate, despite seemingly supporting the FBI and then backtracking. Microsoft later filed an amicus brief backing Apple against the FBI.

Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak also spoke out against the FBI on the Conan OBrien show on Monday, saying: I side with Apple on this one. [The FBI] picked the lamest case you ever could.

Wozniak added: Verizon turned over all the phone records and SMS messages. So they want to take this other phone that the two didnt destroy, which was a work phone. Its so lame and worthless to expect theres something on it and to get Apple to expose it.

Apples clash with the FBI comes to a head in California this month when the two will meet in federal court to debate whether the smartphone manufacturer should be required to weaken security settings on the iPhone of the shooter.

The governments case was dealt a potential setback when Magistrate Judge James Orenstein ruled against the government on 29 February in a different phone-unlocking case, which the government is currently appealing.

See the original post here:
Snowden: FBI's claim it can't unlock the San Bernardino ...