‘The end of exile’: Edward Snowden chats with CU-Boulder …

Former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden hosted an intimate yet high-tech conversation in Boulder on Tuesday evening, sharing his thoughts on human rights, terrorism and why he leaked information on domestic surveillance programs during a live video chat from Moscow.

Wearing black earbuds and sitting in front of a black backdrop, the image of Snowden filled a giant projector screen hanging above the stage in Macky Auditorium at the University of Colorado.

Snowden took questions from author and Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Ron Suskind, who sat in a chair on stage and peered into a large computer screen, before answering a few questions collected via social media from attendees using the hashtag #SnowdenCU.

Bob Hopper, of Boulder, listens to Edward Snowden speak during a live video chat Tuesday night on the University of Colorado's Boulder campus. (Jeremy Papasso / Staff Photographer)

Snowden is facing federal charges in the U.S. including some brought under the 1917 Espionage Act for leaking government documents, and had his U.S. passport revoked. But despite all of that, he pointed out that he was still able to communicate with hundreds of people in Boulder.

He said technology has empowered us.

"It is the end of exile in a very new and real way," he said.

While Snowden spoke from 5,500 miles away using Google Hangouts it was 5 a.m. in Moscow when the talk started the auditorium was peppered with light from iPhone screens as students and community members tweeted rapidly, asking questions about Snowden's life in Russia and his views on presidential politics.

Snowden walked the audience through the events leading up to his decision to share thousands of classified documents with journalists in 2013.

He said he became increasingly disturbed by the fact that the public was no longer a partner to the government.

"They were watching everyone, everywhere, all the time," he said. "It was indiscriminate or dragnet surveillance."

Snowden discussed the difference between legality and morality, pointing out various times in history when laws were later deemed to be immoral, and said he never meant to become the focus of the story.

"I set out to let the public have the information they should have always had that the government kept secret," he said. "You should decide for yourself what kind of world you want to live in."

He refuted the argument that most Americans shouldn't care about mass surveillance by the government because they have nothing to hide.

"That's a fundamental misunderstanding of rights," Snowden said. "It's no different than saying you don't care about the freedom of speech because you have nothing to say."

As the event continued, some of the audience's focus shifted to the moderator, who drew criticism for frequently interrupting Snowden.

Though the complaints burbled up on social media, at one point an audience member shouted, "Let him talk!" which drew loud cheers.

Snowden's appearance was put on by CU's Distinguished Speakers Board, which paid $56,000 in student fees for the event, a total that included Suskind's fee. It's not known how much Snowden received.

Sarah Kuta: 303-473-1106, kutas@dailycamera.com or twitter.com/sarahkuta

See the original post:
'The end of exile': Edward Snowden chats with CU-Boulder ...

Edward Snowden burns Jeb, Kanye in one devastating tweet

What do Kanye West and Jeb Bush have in common? Well, neither has had a great week Kanye with his new album release and Jeb with his ratings in the GOP presidential nomination race. Whistleblower Edward Snowden nailed their plight in one tweet.

On top of troubles withThe Life of Pablo (TLOP)reviews, West revealed that hewould not sell his album for another week and that he is $53 million in debt. He also asked Mark Zuckerberg to invest $1bn in"into Kanye West ideas."

Kanye's plea went without response from Facebook founder, but not without one from Edward Snowden, the famous NSA whistleblower currently residing somewhere in Russia.

The desperate tone reminded Snowden of another public plea

The please clap reference is a jab at Jeb Bushs now infamous request during a speech in New Hampshire, during which he had to implore the crowd to demonstrate its support for his ideas.

Kanye has yet to respond to the former National Security Agency contractor turned privacy hero. But will this become the next Ghostface vs Shkreli? Only time will tell.

Link:
Edward Snowden burns Jeb, Kanye in one devastating tweet

Bradley Manning Chelsea Manning Support Network

Bradley Manning with self-made equality poster

In late May 2010, Private First Class Bradley Manning, an intelligence analyst with the US Army in Baghdad, was arrested, suspected of providing the Collateral Murder video to WikiLeaks.

On June 6, 2010, he was charged with violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice, including eight criminal offenses and four noncriminal violations of Army regulations. The full charge sheet is available at http://www.bradleymanning.org/3163/charge-sheet-html.

His arrest was precipitated by an alleged online chat confession to well-known hacker and journalist Adrian Lamo.

Manning is currently imprisoned in the brig at US Marine Corps Base Quantico in Quantico, Virginia, awaiting trial. If convicted, Manning faces up to 52 years in prison, dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and benefits and unspecified fines. Since his arrest, Bradley Manning has issued no formal public statements. Daniel Ellsberg, the famed whistle blower behind the Pentagon Papers, has heralded Pfc. Bradley Manning as a hero.

The Collateral Murder Video American Soldiers Gunning Down Unarmed Civilians, Journalists and Children

On April 4, 2010, whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks published a classified video of a United States Apache helicopter firing on civilians in New Baghdad in 2007. The video, available at http://www.collateralmurder.com, shows Americans shooting and killing 11 individuals who do not return fire. Two of those killed were Reuters employees, including 22 year old Reuters photojournalist Namir Noor-Eldeen and his driver, 40 year old Saeed Chmagh.

The video includes an audio recording of the internal commentary by the American soldiers before, during and after the shooting. The soldiers repeatedly request and are granted permission to open fire, encourage one another and joke about the dead and dying civilians. (Full transcript available here http://www.collateralmurder.com/en/transcript.html)

A total of 11 adults were killed. Two children, passengers in a van that arrived on the scene after the first bout of gunfire had ceased, were seriously injured when the Apache helicopter opened fire on their van.

In 2007, Reuters called for an investigation into the attack. In response, a spokesman for the multinational forces in Baghdad stated: There is no question that coalition forces were clearly engaged in combat operations against a hostile force.

The Armys report on the deaths of two Reuters employees and the wounding of the two children is here: http://tinyurl.com/yzbp83l

There was no investigation of the nine other deaths.

No charges have been filed against the American soldiers in the Apache helicopter who shot and killed the civilians in the video.

Wikipedia article on Bradley Manning

Read more from the original source:
Bradley Manning Chelsea Manning Support Network

Edward Snowden, Sundar Pichai back Apple in fight over …

1795

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden hailed Apple for refusing to comply with a federal court order to unlock the iPhone used by one of the killers in the San Bernardino mass shooting. Google CEO Sundar Pichai warned of setting a "troubling precedent."

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

On Tuesday, a federal judge ordered Apple to help the FBI break into the iPhone of one of the killers in the San Bernardino, Calif., shootings. Video by Ryan Holmes for USA TODAY

Edward Snowden is seen on a monitor during a live video feed at the Los Angeles Convention Center on Oct. 10, 2015.(Photo: Frederick M. Brown, Getty Images)

SAN FRANCISCO Former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden has backed Apple's refusal to comply with a federal court order to help the FBI unlock an iPhone used by one of the assailants in the mass shootings in San Bernardino, Calif., in December.

"The @FBI is creating a world where citizens rely on #Apple to defend their rights, rather than the other way around," Snowden tweeted.

Snowden called on Internet giant Google to stand with Apple, saying, "This is the most important tech case in a decade."

USA TODAY

Latest: Apple vs. U.S. over terrorist's iPhone

Google CEO Sundar Pichai took a public stand in support of Apple in a series of tweets lateWednesday, saying "forcing companies to enable hacking could compromise users privacy" and would set a"troubling precedent."

USA TODAY

Here's why the FBI forcing Apple to break into an iPhone is a big deal

Apple CEO Tim Cook said late Tuesday that his company would oppose a federal judge's ruling ordering the technology giant to help investigators break into an iPhone belonging to San Bernardino shooter Syed Rizwan Farook.

"We have great respect for the professionals at the FBI, and we believe their intentions are good. Up to this point, we have done everything that is both within our power and within the law to help them," Cook wrote in a letter published on Apple's website.

"But now the U.S. government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone."

Apple and Google engineered their software so they cannot unlock devices in the wake of damaging revelations by Snowden that made the world suspicious they created "back doors" for American intelligence and law enforcement.

The fear: Unlocking the iPhone could hand law enforcement a master encryption key. The FBI hasn't been able to access the smartphone because it is passcode-protected.

"The technical changes the @FBI demands would make it possible to break into an iPhone (5C or older) in a half hour,"Snowden tweeted.

Farook and his wife Tashfeen Malik killed 14 people in December in a mass shooting at a county public health facility. The pairdied in a gun battle with police. An iPhone 5C was recovered from the scene.

USA TODAY

Apple could break into its iPhones in an afternoon, say experts

Snowden tweets fromexile

Snowden has been living in exile in Russia to avoid facing prosecution in the United States for leaking government secrets. He joined Twitter lastSeptember. His Twitter profile reads: "I used to work for the government. Now I work for the public."

He has found a receptive audience on Twitter. Twitter has positioneditself as a digital bastion of free speech and acore group of Twitter users oppose government surveillance and intrusion.

Snowden and Pichaiwerenot the only prominent voices in the tech world to commend Apple on Wednesday.

WhatsApp founder and Facebook board member Jan Koum posted on Facebook: "I have always admired Tim Cook for his stance on privacy and Apple's efforts to protect user data and couldn't agree more with everything said in their Customer Letter today. We must not allow this dangerous precedent to be set. Today our freedom and our liberty is at stake."

USA TODAY

Terrorist's locked phone adds urgency to encryption debate in Congress

Follow USA TODAY senior technology writer Jessica Guynn@jguynn

Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/1Tr1bFV

0) { %>

0) { %>

Continued here:
Edward Snowden, Sundar Pichai back Apple in fight over ...

Edward Snowden defends Apple in fight against FBI – Feb …

On Tuesday, a federal magistrate-judge ruled that Apple must help the FBI break into the phone of one of the San Bernardino shooters. The FBI was unable to figure out the shooter's passcode, which is the only way to get inside his iPhone.

Apple CEO Tim Cook is furious, saying that the U.S. government is trying to undermine the security of its flagship product.

"The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers," Cook said.

Apple plans to fight the decision, aided by the ACLU.

On Wednesday, the divide was clear: politicians versus engineers.

"The FBI is creating a world where citizens rely on Apple to defend their rights, rather than the other way around," Snowden said Wednesday morning on Twitter.

Late Wednesday, Silicon Valley's powerful tech industry trade group came out in support of Apple too.

"We worry about the broader implications ... of requiring technology companies to cooperate with governments to disable security features, or introduce security vulnerabilities," said the Information Technology Industry Council, which represents Dell, Facebook (FB, Tech30), Google, Hewlett Packard (HPE, Tech30), IBM (IBM, Tech30), Microsoft (MSFT, Tech30), Nokia (NOK) and others.

For years, the FBI has demanded special access into smartphones. Tech companies have refused, instead increasing the security of their customers' data.

Cryptographers, the scholars who build security into technology, have unanimously warned that special access is a dangerous idea. To them, this isn't about security competing with privacy. It's just about security.

Read more: Ex-NSA boss says FBI director is wrong on encryption

Tech companies, like Apple (AAPL, Tech30) and Google (GOOGL, Tech30), have security on their devices to keep everyone out: hackers, governments, even the companies themselves.

But if they're forced to open a door for police, criminal hackers and government thugs can get in too.

This battle over data encryption has finally reached a peak.

Read more: The encryption debate... in 2 minutes

The San Bernardino shooter, Syed Farook, used an iPhone 5C. The FBI has been trying to guess his passcode to unlock it. If they guess wrong 10 times, Farook's iPhone will permanently erase all the data stored inside.

Apple doesn't hold the keys to his device. But the FBI wants Apple to create a special version of its iOS software that will get loaded onto the phone, circumvent Apple's security features and let agents hack it.

Dan Guido, who runs the cybersecurity firm Trail of Bits, explained in a blog post Wednesday that this hack is possible. He said it would work on any iPhone 5C or older model, putting them "at risk when they're confiscated by law enforcement around the world."

Read more: Terrorists hide plans by 'going dark'

Last year, the world's top cryptographers issued a joint paper saying this is a bad idea. CNNMoney asked them if this particular San Bernardino case changes their mind. All seven who responded said no.

Matthew Green, who teaches cryptography and computer security at Johns Hopkins University, fears it's a slippery slope. If Apple complies with the government this time, it'll be forced to in the future.

"I haven't seen any guiding principle that would prevent this from getting out of hand. It could easily result in every American becoming less secure," he said.

Columbia University computer science professor Steven M. Bellovin said that if Apple doesn't resist the FBI, it'll soon face the same pressure from authoritarian and repressive governments like China.

"This makes it much easier for others -- other police departments, other governments -- to demand the same thing," he said.

Bruce Schneier, one of the world's top cryptographers, warned that criminals could also use this kind of special access to break into people's phones to steal messages, photographs and other personal information. If Apple creates a weaker version of its operating system, others will get their hands on it.

Most tech industry executives -- who normally tout privacy -- remained silent Wednesday. WhatsApp cofounder Jan Koum stood out with this message on Facebook: "We must not allow this dangerous precedent to be set."

U.S. Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, one of the few politicians to rise to Apple's defense, said "no company should be forced to deliberately weaken its products."

(Read more: Manhattan DA says Apple makes terrorism cases 'go cold')

Other politicians pushed back on that idea Wednesday. White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters that the FBI is "not asking Apple to redesign its product or create a new backdoor to one of their products. They're simply asking for something that would have an impact on this one device."

Leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump weighed in too, saying, "we have to open it up." Marco Rubio, who is also vying for the Republican presidential nomination, said Apple should give up its fight and be "a good corporate citizen."

But even those who support the FBI's demands say it's a point of no return. Cyrus Walker teaches at the government-funded Cyber Defense Analysis Center, where he trains federal agents and police how to hack smartphones in criminal cases.

"If Apple demonstrates the ability to get around its own security countermeasures, that bell is rung and can't be un-rung," said Walker.

CNNMoney (New York) First published February 17, 2016: 1:01 PM ET

Read this article:
Edward Snowden defends Apple in fight against FBI - Feb ...

WS2008: Network Level Authentication and Encryption | Ask …

Welcome to Day Sixteen. Were continuing on with our series on Windows Server 2008 in preparation for the launch. Today, were going to look at Terminal Server security in Windows Server 2008 specifically Network Level Authentication and Encryption.

Terminal Server security may be enhanced by providing user authentication earlier in the connection process when a client connects to a Terminal Server. This early user authentication method is referred to as Network Level Authentication. This is a new authentication method that completes user authentication before you establish a Remote Desktop connection and the logon screen appears. This is a more secure authentication method that can help protect the remote computer from malicious users and malicious software. The advantages to Network Level Authentication are:

There are specific requirements to use Network Level Authentication:

The Terminal Server can be configured to only support connections from clients running Network Level Authentication. This setting can be configured in a couple of different ways:

To determine if a system is running a version of Remote Desktop Connection software that supports Network Level Authentication, start the Remote Desktop Connection client application, click the icon in the upper-left corner of the Remote Desktop Connection dialog box and click About. Look for the phrase, "Network Level Authentication" in the About window as shown below.

By default, Terminal Services sessions use native Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) encryption. However, RDP does not provide authentication to verify the identity of a Terminal Server. You can enhance the security of Terminal Services sessions by using Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.0 for server authentication and to encrypt Terminal Server communications. The Terminal Server and client system must be configured correctly for TLS to provide enhanced security. There are three available security layers outlined in the table below:

When SSL (TLS 1.0) is used to secure communications between a client and Terminal Server, a certificate is needed. You can select a certificate that you have already installed on the Terminal Server or you can use the default self-signed certificate.

For Terminal Services connections, data encryption protects data by encrypting it on the communications link. By default, Terminal Services connections are encrypted at the highest available level of security 128-bit. However, some older versions of the Terminal Services client application do not support this high level of encryption. The encryption level of the connection may be configured to send and receive data using different encryption levels to support legacy clients. There are four configuration options as outlined below:

These encryption levels are stored in the MinEncryptionLevel value in the following registry key: HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlTerminalServerWinStationsRDP-Tcp. There are four possible values for MinEncryptionLevel that correspond to the settings in the table above:

And with that we come to the end of this post. In tomorrows post, well take a look at Terminal Server printing. Until next time

CC Hameed

More:
WS2008: Network Level Authentication and Encryption | Ask ...

Chelsea Manning | Amnesty International UK

19 Jan 2015, 01:00pm

I hope that you will continue supporting my fight for justice. My case impacts important issues that affect many, if not all, Americans. Chelsea Manning

Chelsea Manning is a American soldier and whistleblower. She is currently serving a 35-year sentence in military prison for leaking classified US government documents to the Wikileaks website, and revealing to the public that the US army, the CIA and Iraqi and Afghan forces committed human rights violations.

Chelsea has always claimed that she released information in the public interest. The crimes she exposed have not been investigated.

We continue to call for Chelsea's release.

On 21 August 2013 Private Chelsea Manning was sentenced to 35 years in military prison for handing over documents to WikiLeaks during 2009 and 2010 the biggest information leak in US military history.

Chelsea was found guilty of numerous offences, including theft and espionage. During her trial she was banned from presenting her evidence or the motives behind her actions, including her claim that she was acting in the public interest in exposing military abuses.

Until her trial, Chelsea was known as Private Bradley Manning. She now identifies as a woman.

While stationed in Iraq between November 2009 and May 2010, US military analyst Chelsea obtained and distributed classified military information to the WikiLeaks website. She was arrested in May 2010 after a former computer hacker reported Chelsea to the FBI.

Chelsea says she acted with the intention of exposing potential human rights abuses by the US army and its allies, in order to open up informed public debate around American operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

It was never my intention to hurt anyone. I only wanted to help people. When I chose to disclose classified information, I did so out of a love for my country and a sense of duty to others. Chelsea Manning

Information leaked by Chelsea included details of potential human rights abuses, including a secret attack by a US Apache helicopter in Baghdad, in which US soldiers killed 12 people, including civilians. To date, there has been no independent and impartial investigation into this attack US authorities have focused on charging Chelsea, rather than investigating the content of material she drew attention to.

After her arrest, Chelsea was held for three years in pre-trial detention. She was kept in solitary confinement for eleven months of her pre-trial detention, in conditions that amount to torture, according to the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture.

Chelsea was confined in a windowless six-metre cell for 23 hours a day, without personal possessions, bed sheets, and at times even her glasses. While she was seen as a suicide risk, Chelsea was only allowed to wear her boxer shorts in her cell, and was sometimes forced to go without even her underwear.

Chelsea has described how she was verbally harassed just before the suicide watch began and how she believed that it was a punishment imposed upon her as a retribution for a protest at the conditions of her detention that had been held outside the detention centre the previous day.

At her July 2013 trial, Chelsea was not allowed to present evidence that she was acting in the public interest her defense all along; instead she could only explain her motives when she was being sentenced, and the judgment had already been made.

I will serve my time knowing that sometimes you have to pay a heavy price to live in a free society. Chelsea Manning

Chelsea pleaded guilty to charges involving the leaking of the classified material. However, the military brought several much more serious charges against her, including violating Americas Espionage Act and aiding the enemy. She was not convicted of 'aiding the enemy' but was found guilty of violating the Espionage Act on numerous counts.

Prosecuting beyond the information leak to WikiLeaks constitutes overcharging: rather than punishing Chelsea just for the leaking offences she had already admitted to, the prosecution brought wider ideological charges against her. In doing so, the prosecution said they intended to send a harsh warning to other potential whistleblowers an action that could prevent information about human rights abuses and wrongdoing being revealed by military personnel in future.

Go here to see the original:
Chelsea Manning | Amnesty International UK

Is the NSA Spying on Me? – Techopedia.com

Takeaway: This question doesn't have an easy answer, which is a big part of the problem.

Actually, that isn't such an easy question to answer. Since 2001 - shortly after the September 11th attacks - the NSA has been running a program called the "Presidents Surveillance Program," or simply "The Program."

If it sounds secretive, that's because it is: "The Program" is technically still classified. However, recent reports from various whistle blowers have brought awareness of this surveillance to the public. And that has people wondering just exactly what the NSA is doing, and what it means for the rest of us. Here we look at some of the answers. (Follow the privacy debate in real time on Twitter. Check out The Online Privacy Debate: Top Twitter Influencers to Follow.)

But here's where things get iffy: The Program gathers data on millions of Americans, most of whom have never been and never will be connected to terrorism in any way. And, it says that it may collect those records and hold them for up to five years. It won't, however, be able to use that data unless there is a reason, such as a tip. In theory, it's one that would have to be certified by an attorney general before the NSA could dig into the data. Even so, according to an article by Marc Armbinder for TheWeek, this certification can come after the data has been used, which doesn't provide much assurance for those who are concerned their data may be mined without cause. (Read more about online privacy in Don't Look Now But Online Privacy May Be Gone for Good.)

With emails, its generally believed that the agency is not reading them all. Instead, theyre data mining, or using analytical software that searches for possible terrorist activity patterns in keywords, financial transactions and travel records. Should I Be Worried? On the one hand, it's easy to say that the average American doesnt have anything to worry about in terms of the data the NSA is collecting. And yes, its highly unlikely that the NSA cares about the everyday secrets of ordinary U.S. citizens.

On the other hand, a Bloomberg investigation did find that a few NSA contractors and employees had deliberately spied on Americans, overstepping the authority of The Program. These incidences have been very few and far between - about one per year over the past decade. It was later found to be cases of personal spying on the employees lovers. Even so, it is one strong example of why collecting personal data is problematic: It creates the potential for misuse.

On a more general level, legality of the Program itself and the role of private communication in a free, democratic society is worth thinking about too. If a future administration comes to be led by a less scrupulous president, this mass surveillance could be used as a weapon. For example, it could be used to blackmail members of Congress or provide illicit political intelligence.

So is the NSA spying on you? The answer is maybe. But then again, one of the biggest problems around the NSA debate is the lack of information about what the NSA's doing, and even what it's allowed to do. That because much of what the organization does is classified. Looks like someone still has a right to privacy after all.

Read more:
Is the NSA Spying on Me? - Techopedia.com

Edward Snowden would be willing to return to US for fair …

Edward Snowden appears on live video feed broadcast from Moscow. Photograph: Marco Garcia/AP

Edward Snowden has told supporters he would be willing to return to the US if the government could guarantee a fair trial.

The former National Security Agency contractor, who has been living in Russia since June 2013, said he would present a public interest defence of his decision to leak thousands of classified intelligence documents if he appeared before a US jury. Ive told the government I would return if they would guarantee a fair trial where I can make a public interest defence of why this was done and allow a jury to decide, Snowden told a libertarian conference, the New Hampshire Liberty Forum.

Related: Edward Snowden attacks UK government over investigatory powers bill

Snowden, who was speaking via Google Hangouts, faces US charges under the Espionage Act that could land him in prison for up to 30 years.

In May 2013, Snowden flew to Hong Kong after leaving his job at an NSA facility in Hawaii. The following month he revealed thousands of classified NSA documents, and then travelled to Russia, where he was subsequently granted asylum.

The documents revealed the existence of mass surveillance programmes run by the NSA and British intelligence agency GCHQ, which involved the bulk interception of phonecalls and internet traffic.

Snowden has previously spoken of making offers to the government to return home and his willingness to discuss a plea deal and even go to jail. But in an interview on BBC Panorama last year, the whistleblower said the US justice department had made no effort to contact him.

Snowdens revelations set off an international debate about the balance between security and privacy. Supporters hailed Snowden for exposing what they saw in some cases as an illegal invasion of privacy, while critics believed he hampered the security services ability to fight terrorism.

Go here to see the original:
Edward Snowden would be willing to return to US for fair ...

Edward Snowden says he’s willing to return to U.S. if …

Speaking via Skype from Russia, Edward Snowden told an audience of supporters in New Hampshire on Saturday that he is willing to be extradited to the United States if the federal government would guarantee he would get a fair trial.

The former National Security Agency contractor in 2013 leaked details of a secret government eavesdropping program and left the country. He faces U.S. charges that could land him in prison for up to 30 years.

Snowden spoke Saturday at the New Hampshire Liberty Forum, heavily attended by libertarians.WMUR reported that forum organizers did not allow the media to video record his remarks.

"I've told the government I would return if they would guarantee a fair trial where I can make a public interest defense of why this was done and allow a jury to decide," Snowden told his audience.

Snowden has previously spoken of making offers to the government to return home and his willingness to discuss a plea deal and even go to jail. Last year, former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said a plea deal with Snowden was a possibility, but Snowden told the BBC in an interview in October that he and his lawyers were still waiting to hear from the government.

Snowden's revelations about the NSA, Britain's GCHQ and other intelligence agencies set off an international debate about spies' powers to monitor personal communications, and about the balance between security and privacy. Critics say his disclosures harmed the ability of the United States and its allies to fight terrorism.

To some, he is a traitor; to others, a hero.

Saturday, Snowden said that while some of his former colleagues at the NSA and the Central Intelligence Agency were sympathetic to his beliefs concerning individual privacy and freedom, others said "the Constitution doesn't really matter."

Associated Press

See the article here:
Edward Snowden says he's willing to return to U.S. if ...