Killing ‘Cryptocurrency’: Why It’s Time to Retire the Term – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Tim Enneking ismanaging director at Crypto Asset Management, which overseesCrypto Asset Fund, a regulated US cryptocurrency trading fund.

In this opinion piece,Enneking argues thatthe term "cryptocurrencies" is now outdated, and that new terminology is needed to describe the innovationsbeing imagined and built in the blockchain industry.

No, that headline is not a mistake.

Its not the cryptocurrencies themselves that should be killed off, but rather the term (hence the quotation marks). Labeling everything going on in the crypto world (space, ecosystem, universe: pick one) "currencies" is dead, pass, OBE You get the idea.

Two questions logically arise: First, why is the term dead and, second, if it's dead, what should replace it?

As to the first, that's easy. There are two problems with applying the phrase "cryptocurrency" to what's going on in the space traditionally known by that name. First, the "coins" are acting less and less like coins and more and more like something else, perhaps equities.

In fact, for my fund, we divide the cryptocurrency space into "blue chips,""large caps,""mid caps,""small caps,""pennies," ("penny coins" seemed redundant) and "NLT" ("no longer traded").

(Now, before you think I am trying to tout my fund, please realize that we decided to name it "Crypto Asset Fund" for the same reasons as those I'm citing here.For the record, my prior fund was indeed called the "Crypto Currency Fund" so we are following the same evolution as the crypto ecosystem itself.)

Related to this shift is the fact that, when bitcoin was effectively the only game in town, aficionados touted it as a "dollar replacement", or at least a supplement but the target was clearly displacing, to one degree or another, fiat currencies. Now, however, with the emphasis on blockchain, ethereum contracts, Ripple bank transfers, etc, etc, cryptocurrenciesare becoming more a transaction enabler than the transaction itself. Their use as currencies, per se, is clearly decreasing.

So, cryptocurrencies are rapidly migrating away from being a medium of exchange (one of probably the most critical of the purposes of a "currency") into enablers of exchanges.

ICOs, tokens, tethers, exchange lending, the (slowly) growing crypto-derivatives market: all reinforce the strong secular shift of cryptocurrencies to crypto "assets."

Which leads us directly to the second question: What should we call all this stuff?

We have voted with our pens and opted for "assets" a nice, all-encompassing fiat word that is sufficiently vague to cover just about everything that might happen in the crypto space.

Why does this matter? Because perception is reality. If we want to attract more investors and users to the crypto universe, then we need those investors to quickly and easily understand what the space offers. Mislabeling (or, at least, too narrowly labeling) the space doesn't help. The name also inevitably affects how those of us already in the space view it, and ourselves, as well.

Labels matter.

A real-life example: CNBC asked me to appear live on Capital Connection out of Singapore(the interview took place and was broadcast July 5) and to recommend "three cryptocurrencies". I declined to do so, countering with three much more varied investments in the crypto space: one lower risk (whatever that might mean), one moderate risk and one higher risk.

The first is lending (fixed income), the second is a coin (equities) and the third is an ICO (IPO or alts). The italicized terms are the fiat equivalent of these three investments, which, by no coincidence, cover the three "legs" of the typical fiat investment "stool."

So, lets move to a much more accurate characterization of the space, ecosystem, universe, whatever (do I sense another opinion piecein the offing?) and call the sector (!) were working in "crypto assets" or even just "crypto", shall we?

I'd argue it makes much more sense.

Disclosure:CoinDesk is a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, whichhas an ownership stake in Ripple.

Funeral candles image via Shutterstock

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk strives to offer an open platform for dialogue and discussion on all things blockchain by encouraging contributed articles. As such, the opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the view of CoinDesk.

For more details on how you can submit an opinion or analysis article, view our Editorial Collaboration Guide or email [emailprotected].

Here is the original post:
Killing 'Cryptocurrency': Why It's Time to Retire the Term - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

New ICO Promises Mainstream Adoption of Cryptocurrencies – HuffPost

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, while potentially transformative on the macro level, are hard for most people to adopt on the micro-level. Indeed, the opportunities created by Bitcoin and its underlying technologyblockchainare only being used by 8-10 million people (1% of the worlds population), and a significant share of that number comprises government entities, stock exchanges, banks, financial services firms, and startups.

For the large majority of people, the technology is hard to grasp, and the cryptocurrency is difficult to mine given the hard-earned cryptographical skill set needed to mine it. Bitcoin and Ethereum are relatively popular cryptocurrencies, but with new digital wallets with no instruction manuals and no single platform to centralize trading for the everyday consumer, progress towards full integration of the currency in world economies remains slow. Yet, as with many affairs in the world of financial services, there may be hopeand it comes from Switzerland.

Corion, a unified, unregulated, decentralized, mobile cryptocurrency platform operating on the Ethereum Classic blockchain, is underway in its Initial Coin Offering (ICO). The offering, which will close on July 30, will pay out between 3-25% bonus to participants, with early birds earning 0.2% daily during the offering and service providers generating between 5-10x more return on existing 0-2.5% coin supply growth in the medium term.

The ICO gives both service providers and consumers the opportunity to invest in a new cryptocurrency that allows them to help build the Corion ecosystem, a multifunctional platform allowing businesses and individuals to transact between each other on the Corion platform, which provides and hosts secure, convenient, and real-time financial transactions between members using Corion coin.

The main pain point within the overall blockchain environment Corion seeks to alleviate is that the current collection of cryptocurrencies operate in centralized and debt-based contexts. The value of these cryptocurrencies, especially Bitcoin with its various and controversial hard forks over the last few years, are volatile, with Ethereum being held up as Bitcoins potential yet uncertain successor. Driving such volatility is the scarcity-based value of cryptocurrencywith only so many cryptographers and developers able to mine and distribute it, demand simply isnt part of the equation here. And, with only 1% of the worlds population actively using any such currency right now, theres just not the level of adoption present to transition it from short-term, speculative income for a majority of people.

Corions main goal is to create a blockchain-based, decentralized cryptocurrency ecosystem driving demand based on coin rewards and benchmarking against current fiat currencies. The ecosystem, accessible through the Corion platform, would focus cryptocurrency into mainstream usage, taking it from short-term speculative income to continuous passive income through community management. More, Corion consists of separate smart contracts, implemented in Solidity language for maximum transparency and trust.

Corion has created an ecosystem and suite of services that rival emerging blockchain services offered by bulge-bracket banks like Citi and BNY Mellon, integrating payment, finance, and trading functionalities on its singular mobile platform, accessible by any user. At the same time, Corions developers are working B2B to increase the total user base of all cryptocurrencies, something no company has done until now. This innovative business model encourages cross-currency exchange, and inter-wallet and inter-platform cooperation and synergy.

To facilitate the transition of cryptocurrencies to mainstream use that Corion looks to achieve, the Corion platform features seven unique features to humanize the cryptocurrency experience for the average user. These features include a marketplace that promotes commerce, a stable cryptocurrency to promote mainstream use, a reward system for users based on Schelling points which allows users to grow their coins, a multifunctional wallet that operates as the main interface of the platform, and more.

Currently, the battle for cryptocurrency supremacy is ongoing. Corion enters with high aspirations, and well have to keep watch to see if this innovative platform can change the crypto world.

The Morning Email

Wake up to the day's most important news.

Visit link:
New ICO Promises Mainstream Adoption of Cryptocurrencies - HuffPost

China and Japan Are Largely Responsible for the Current Success of Cryptocurrency – Futurism

In BriefThe adoption of digital currencies on both the individual andinstitutional level in China and Japan is propellingcryptocurrencies to ever greater heights. However, some are stillskeptical that they are the finance systems of the future due totheir current volatility. China and Japans Crypto Craze

The age of cryptocurrencies is upon us, and two countries in particular have been instrumental in their stratospheric rise: China and Japan.

Cryptocurrencies have become popular in China due to the governments stringent control of the yuan a power they occasionally exercise by artificially devaluing the currency for trading purposes. With private wealth in China growing, affluent individuals have found a more stable and accessible alternative to the yuan in cryptocurrencies.

Additionally, China has an abundance of cheap energy and hardware, which facilitates crypto mining (the process throughwhich new blocks in the blockchain are created and transactions are verified). Chinese exchanges runmining poolsto generate these blocks, and these efforts constitute 60 percent of Bitcoins total hashrate (the speed at which Bitcoin operations are completed).

Japan got its foot in the cryptocurrency door at the beginning of 2017 when the market in China experienced an institutional and systematic crackdown, with the most potent measure being a ban on all cryptocurrency withdrawals. This caused an increase in Japans trading volume, which grew from one percent to as high as six percent.

Cryptocurrency adoption was further amplified by currency turbulence in the country. Quantitive easing lead to extremely low interest rates, which have occasionally even become negative, meaning that it costs an individual to save money. As in China, cryptocurrencies therefore became viewed as a more stable asset than the native currency, so morepeople have chosen to invest and store their money in them.

The final piece in the cryptocurrency success puzzle for both countries is increasing institutional acceptance. In China, this takes the form of the countrys Royal Mint, which has invested resources and money into digitizing the yuan and promoting blockchain technology. Japan, meanwhile, began accepting payments in stores using cryptocurrencies earlier this year, and its three largest banks MUFJ, Mizuho, and SMBC have all backed the countrys largest Bitcoin exchange, bitFlyer.

The enthusiasm with which China and Japan have embraced cryptocurrency systems has contributed totheir worldwide success. Virtual currencies have become more popular and valuable than the vast majority of people could have anticipated upontheir inception around a decade ago. The value of a single bitcoin has risen from roughly $0.00075 to $2,500, and the market cap for all cryptocurrencies has exceed $100 billion.

The success of cryptocurrencies is also reflected in their increasing adoption by formal institutions. Wall Street is making moves to start using cryptocurrency systems by next year, a Swiss town called Zug has begun to accept payments in bitcoins, and the Gemini Trust in New York has been licensed to trade ether.

However, some worrying news concerning cryptocurrencies has emerged as well. Recently, in spite of claims that the systems are highly secure, hacks have lead to personal information being leakedand exchanges have been robbed, one to the tune of$79 million.

In addition, while cryptocurrencies may be more stable assets than the native currency in Japan and China, they are not absolutely stable. In fact, they are currently far from it, and though prices continue to rise, rapid drops are not uncommon, and public opinion can have a major impact on value.

Mark Cuban illustrated the issue perfectly when he took to Twitter to assert that Bitcoin wasnt a currency, its valuation dropped rapidly. Even more recently, Ethereum lost $4 billion worth of market value when a bogus story that its founder, Vitalik Buterin, had died in a car crash was published on 4chan.

Cryptocurrencies are clearly on the rise, and due to their successes, they can no longer be dismissed as a niche monetary system. The pertinent question is will this rise will lead to the worldwide adoption of an entirely new currency and finance system?

Read more from the original source:
China and Japan Are Largely Responsible for the Current Success of Cryptocurrency - Futurism

National Science Foundation Awards $450k for Cryptocurrency Incentive Study – CoinDesk

A Princeton University researcher has receivedmore than $400,000 in federal funding to study mechanism incentivesand their applications to cryptocurrencies like bitcoin.

The study project, "Duality-based tools for simple vs. optimal mechanism design and applications to cryptocurrency", is being led by Seth Weinberg, an assistant professor of computer science at Princeton. The grant, worth $450,000, was awarded on 28th June by the National Science Foundation. The project is set to begin in September and will last until August 31, 2020, according to the NSF.

As theorganization's website explains:

"A secondary focus of this project is to apply these theoretical foundations to resolve cryptocurrency incentive issues arising within Bitcoin, an emerging cryptocurrency. While bitcoin has remained largely immune to traditional security breaches, numerous incentive issues have been discovered which could undermine its future security if not properly addressed."

Though cryptocurrencies constitute only part of the research study its primary focus is the design of algorithmic mechanisms and the theoretical incentives at play its the latest instance of a projectthat involves the tech receiving federal backing.

In mid-2015, the NSF awarded $3m to theInitiative for Cryptocurrency and Contracts (IC3), a research effort involving academics from Cornell, the University of Maryland and the University of California Berkeley. The NSF has also moved to back cybersecurity-related research that involves blockchain.

Image via Shutterstock

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is an independent media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. Have breaking news or a story tip to send to our journalists? Contact us at [emailprotected].

See the original post:
National Science Foundation Awards $450k for Cryptocurrency Incentive Study - CoinDesk

Russia’s tech world embraces cryptocurrency markets – Russia Beyond the Headlines

In the first nine minutes of its Initial Coin Offering (ICO) New York-based Starta Accelerator raised more than $1.6 million. This is just one of many successful projects that recently secured investment in the cryptocurrency world. What is the Russian ICO craze all about and why is it proliferating?

Facebook

Pinterest

WhatsApp

This blockchain investment mechanism is rapidly becoming very popular among Russian entrepreneurs. Source: Jens Kalaene/Global Look Press

Facing a shortage of venture capital at home and coming up against wary international investors intimidated by U.S. and EU sanctions, more Russian tech projects are tapping into cryptocurrency markets. In the first half of 2017, a growing number of Russian startups successfully completed an ICO, raising millions of dollars in Bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies from backers across the globe.

This blockchain investment mechanism is rapidly becoming very popular among Russian entrepreneurs seeking to raise capital. By the time Starta Accelerator had closed its ICO on July 4, the company had raised a total of about $5 million for 21 startups from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus; each of which is already incorporated and working in the U.S.

One of the most successful recent ICOs in the Russian startup sector was Supercomputer Organized by Network Mining (SONM), which raised $42 million from 8,744 backers in just four days.

The project is described as Airbnb for computers, and SONMs secure and cost-effective fog supercomputer is designed for general-purpose computing, from mobile app hosting to DNA analysis. The project will revolutionize the computing market, claimed Sergey Ponomarev, the companys CEO.

SONM is a blockchain-powered project, but more startups are coming from the real economy. In mid June, ZrCoin, an innovative factory that recycles metallurgical waste, raised more than $7 million from almost 4,000 backers on Waves, a blockchain-based cryptocurrency platform. We raised twice as much funding as planned, commented ZrCoins co-founder, Andrey Nokonorov.

The new factory will consist of two production lines in Siberia transforming industrial waste into synthetic zirconium with a total capacity of 800 tons. Each ZrCoin token is backed with one kilogram (2.2 pounds) of zirconium dioxide.

ICO as a means for Russian tech to raise capital has attracted the attention of the countrys politicians. Boris Titov, the business ombudsman and billionaire, is creating a new incubator for entrepreneurs hosted on the blockchain platform, Waves. The project was founded in 2016 by Russian entrepreneur Sasha Ivanov and is now one of the most popular ICO platforms.

Sasha Ivanov. / WAVES

In June, Titov signed an agreement with Sasha Ivanov to create an ICO Incubator called People of Growth, whose purpose is to help companies in different sectors of the real economy obtain ICO funding.

Russia is one of the most advanced countries in blockchain technology, and thats why Russian founders are behind many ICOs in the world, said Ivanov. The interest in ICO and cryptocurrency is growing rapidly both in Russia and around the world.

According to Ivanov, Bitcoin was legalized in Japan this spring, and the cryptocurrency community is hoping to see a similar process in other countries. Entrepreneurs are also inspired by the success of previous ICOs and the amounts raised, although the lack of venture capital is one of the main reasons this is happening.

About six months ago Titov launched his own cryptocurrency, Upcoin, to promote his political movement, the Party of Growth. The coins were integrated into the party loyalty program to reward supporters with a number of benefits, such as discounts for education.

Titov is authorized by President Vladimir Putin to protect the rights of entrepreneurs in Russia. In 2017, he attended Donald Trumps inauguration in Washington D.C.

Follow this link:
Russia's tech world embraces cryptocurrency markets - Russia Beyond the Headlines

WikiLeaks drops new CIA tools, BothanSpy and Gyrfalcon – SC Magazine

WikiLeaks drops new CIA tools, BothanSpy and Gyrfalcon

WikiLeaks latest Vault7 offering includes two CIA hacking tools, BothanSpy and Gyrfalcon 2.0, which can swipe SSH credentials.

BothanSpy and Gyrfalcon target the Windows and Linux operating systems, respectively, reported Bleeping Computer.

According to the BothanSpy user manual, posted by Wikileaks and dating from 2015, this malware will is a tool that targets the SSH client program Xshell and steals user credentials for all active SSH sessions. BothanSpy will exfiltrate the stolen credentials through the Fire and Collect (F&C) channel and out to disk on the attacker-side. By using F&C, BothanSpy never touches disk.

The even older Gyrfalcon manual states The application compresses, encrypts, and stores the collected data into a collection file kept on the Linux platform's file system. Gyrfalcon is capable of collecting full or partial OpenSSH session traffic including user name and passwords of OpenSSH users.

Bleeping Computer noted that WikiLeaks has previously released 13 pieces of malware the hacktivist group claims has been pulled from the CIA.

More here:
WikiLeaks drops new CIA tools, BothanSpy and Gyrfalcon - SC Magazine

WikiLeaks: CIA steals SSH credentials from Windows and Linux with BothanSpy and Gyrfalcon tools – BetaNews

The latest addition to WikiLeaks' Vault 7 cache of CIA tools and documents gives details of tools used by the agency to attack Windows and Linux computers. The BothanSpy and Gyrfalcon projects can be used to intercept and exfiltrate SSH (Secure Shell) credentials.

BothanSpy is used to target Windows, while Gyrfalcon is used for Linux machines, with both working in different ways. A number of popular distros can be hit by Gyrfalcon, including CentOS, Debian, RedHat, openSUSE and Ubuntu, and both tools function as implants that steal credentials before transmitting them to a CIA server.

The leaked documentation for the tools was updated as recently as March 2015, and the file relating to BothanSpy reveals that XShell needs to be installed as it itself installs as a Shellterm extension. There are smatterings of humor throughout the file, with a warning that: "It does not destroy the Death Star, nor does it detect traps laid by The Emperor to destroy Rebel fleets." There is also the introductory quip: "Many Bothan spies will die to bring you this information, remember their sacrifice."

Writing about the Windows tools, BothanSpy, WikiLeaks says:

BothanSpy is an implant that targets the SSH client program Xshell on the Microsoft Windows platform and steals user credentials for all active SSH sessions. These credentials are either username and password in case of password-authenticated SSH sessions or username, filename of private SSH key and key password if public key authentication is used. BothanSpy can exfiltrate the stolen credentials to a CIA-controlled server (so the implant never touches the disk on the target system) or save it in an encrypted file for later exfiltration by other means. BothanSpy is installed as a Shellterm 3.x extension on the target machine.

The Linux tool is different, and the guide warns that anyone using it must "obtain a thorough understanding of the Linux/UNIX command line interface and shells such as bash, csh, and sh." There is the additional note that: "Both the library and application must be installed with root privileges, however, they do not need root privilege to execute successfully on the Linux platform. Therefore, the operator must be confident with their understanding of Linux to use root privileges and not muck up the Linux platform's configuration."

About Gyrfalcon WikiLeaks says:

Gyrfalcon is an implant that targets the OpenSSH client on Linux platforms (centos, debian, rhel, suse, ubuntu). The implant can not only steal user credentials of active SSH sessions, but is also capable of collecting full or partial OpenSSH session traffic. All collected information is stored in an encrypted file for later exfiltration. It is installed and configured by using a CIA-developed root kit (JQC/KitV) on the target machine.

You can read more about BothanSpy and Gyrfalcon over on WikiLeaks.

Image credit: i3alda and Stanislaw Mikulski / Shutterstock

Read more here:
WikiLeaks: CIA steals SSH credentials from Windows and Linux with BothanSpy and Gyrfalcon tools - BetaNews

Edward Snowden On Chris Christie Sunbathing Pic: ‘The …

WASHINGTON National Security Agency whistleblowerEdward Snowdensays aphotographer managed to capture the politics of an era when he snapped a photo of New Jersey Gov.Chris Christie(R) lounging with his family and friends on an otherwise empty stretch of beach.

Rarely does a photographer capture the politics of an era in one frame, Snowden posted Monday on Twitter, along with The Star-Ledgers front page showing Christiekicked back on a state beachthat hed ordered closed to the public amid a state government shutdown.

Snowden also retweeted a post from Steve Politi, the newspapers sports columnist, showing throngs of beachgoers crowded at one end of a long stretch of sandy shore.

On Sunday,NJ Advance Mediapublished several aerial photostaken by Andrew Mills showing Christie, along with family and friends, at New Jerseys Island Beach State Park, the site of an official governors residence.The park was one ofseveral closedover the holiday weekend after lawmakers failed to pass a state budget.

Inan interview with Fox 5in New York on Monday, Christie mocked local media, saying, What a great bit of journalism by The Star-Ledger and I really wonder about journalists who spend money flying planes to look whether people are actually where they said they would be. He said he announced his plans to vacation at the New Jersey residence regardless of whether a shutdown occurred and dismissed the idea that the beach closure was in any way his fault.

In a separate interview Monday withFox 29in Philadelphia, Christie was asked about people who are upset about not being able to enjoy the beach over the holiday weekend.

Im sorry theyre not the governor, he said. This is a residence.

Go here to see the original:
Edward Snowden On Chris Christie Sunbathing Pic: 'The ...

On Encryption, Archiving, and Accountability – Freedom to Tinker

As Elites Switch to Texting, Watchdogs Fear Loss of Accountability, says a headline in todays New York Times. The story describes a rising concern among rule enforcers and compliance officers:

Secure messaging apps like WhatsApp, Signal and Confide are making inroads among lawmakers, corporate executives and other prominent communicators. Spooked by surveillance and wary of being exposed by hackers, they are switching from phone calls and emails to apps that allow them to send encrypted and self-destructing texts. These apps have obvious benefits, but their use is causing problems in heavily regulated industries, where careful record-keeping is standard procedure.

Among those industries is the government, where laws often require that officials work-related communications be retained, archived, and available to the public under the Freedom of Information Act. The move to secure messaging apps frustrates these goals.

The switch to more secure messaging is happening, and for good reason, because old-school messages are increasingly vulnerable to compromisethe DNC and the Clinton campaign are among the many organizations that have paid a price for underestimating these risks.

The tradeoffs here are real. But this is not just a case of choosing between insecure-and-compliant or secure-and-noncompliant. The new secure apps have three properties that differ from old-school email: they encrypt messages end-to-end from the sender to the receiver; they sometimes delete messages quickly after they are transmitted and read; and they are set up and controlled by the end user rather than the employer.

If the concern is lack of archiving, then the last propertyuser control of the account, rather than employer controlis the main problem. And of course that has been a persistent problem even with email. Public officials using their personal email accounts for public business is typically not allowed (and when it happens by accident, messages are supposed to be forwarded to official accounts so they will be archived), but unreported use of personal accounts has been all too common.

Much of the reporting on this issue (but not the Times article) makes the mistake of conflating the personal-account problem with the fact that these apps use encryption. There is nothing about end-to-end encryption of data in transit that is inconsistent with archiving. The app could record messages and then upload them to an archivewith this upload also protected by end-to-end encryption as a best practice.

The second property of these appsdeleting messages shortly after usehas more complicated security implications. Again, the message becoming unavailable to the user shortly after use need not conflict with archiving. The message could be uploaded securely to an archive before deleting it from the endpoint device.

You might ask why the user should lose access to a message when that message is still stored in an archive. But this makes some sense as a security precaution. Most compromises of communications happen through the users access, for example because an attacker can get the users login credentials by phishing. Taking away the users access, while retaining access in a more carefully guarded archive, is a reasonable security precaution for sensitive messages.

But of course the archive still poses a security risk. Although an archive ought to be more carefully protected than a user account would be, the archive is also a big, high-value target for attackers. The decision to create an archive should not be taken lightly, but it may be justified if the need for accountability is strong enough and the communications are not overly sensitive.

The upshot of all of this is that the most modern, secure approaches to secure communication are not entirely incompatible with the kind of accountability needed for government and some other users. Accountable versions of these types of services could be created. These would be less secure than the current versions, but more secure than old-school communications. The barriers to creating these are institutional, not technical.

Read more here:
On Encryption, Archiving, and Accountability - Freedom to Tinker

Top five questions about using quantum-safe security in financial transactions – Banking Technology

Isaras Scott Totzke answers top five questions on quantum-safe security in financial transactions

A wide range of technology-driven sectors will be affected by the advent of universal quantum computing many experts say will happen by 2026, but the financial industry has particular reason to be concerned.

The security standards behind secure email and internet connections are ubiquitous throughout fintech, protecting financial collateral as well as the most sensitive personal identity data in financial transactions.

In fact, the fundamental activities that the financial industry relies on to function today can be stopped in their tracks whenever quantum computers capable of breaking the cryptography they use become commercially available, including:

These are all integral to how commerce functions in the 21stcentury, and to how consumers connect with their finances. Financial institutions and fintech developers will have to update all of the systems using the affected cryptography, whether theyre built in-house, outsourced to partners, or provided by OEM partners. Try identifying parties required to coordinate upgrades to quantum-safe security and the scope becomes very wide for any one of the above activities.

These are the top five questions for fintech decision makers to consider:

Yes. If you store customer data, protect corporate information, or secure employee data, you are at risk.

The first stage is understanding what systems and information you have at risk. Quantum readiness assessments help you identify your organisations quantum risks, develop an upgrade path, and deliver a plan to move forward.

New technology decisions must consider long-term privacy and security capabilities. You need to begin by identifying privacy and secrecy obligations that extend beyond the time when quantum computers might become a real threat, evaluating solutions and planning your migration to quantum resistant infrastructure, and ensuring your security vendors have quantum resistant solutions on their roadmaps.

The roll-out of a complete transition to quantum safe security should be complete before quantum computers capable of breaking your cryptography become commercially available. However, for some parts of your security systems, cryptographic agility to select classical and quantum resistant algorithms may remove any risk.

Look for solutions being considered for standardisation, and prioritise acost-effective solution that provides the type of crypto agility you need to deploy quantum resistant algorithms that will protect your systems from quantum attacks.

Like todays encryption technology, the leading candidates for standardisation already benefit from years of academic scrutiny and review of their security properties.

Any technology that relies on public key cryptography, including emerging tech like blockchain, has built its security guarantee on that cryptography being unbreakable. If that cryptography is vulnerable to attack, then all the promise of the technology is lost, and the time and effort spent integrating that technology into your business offering is wasted.

When quantum computers arrive, IT departments should already have migrated those solutions to quantum-safe encryption, a process that could take up to ten years in some cases.

The key to adopting new technologies is to build quantum-safe solutions into them from the start, making a hybrid transition process possible wherever you can.

By Scott Totzke, CEO ofIsara

Go here to read the rest:
Top five questions about using quantum-safe security in financial transactions - Banking Technology