California exit, secession leader welcomes Julian Assange …

The cofounder of the California separatist group Yes California said in an interview Monday that the group welcomes "the vocal support" of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who recently began tweeting about the California independence campaign known as "Calexit."

"Ultimately the Calexit vote and its preceding debate will be up to Californians to decide but we welcome the vocal support of Julian Assange, as we would for any individual with the courage to stand up against and defy the powers that be in order to affect positive change in this world," said Louis Marinelli, the cofounder. "That's what our campaign is all about."

Marinelli, a 31-year-old activist, announced in a 1,600-word statement on Monday that he would return to California after spending just over a year in Russia's fourth-largest city, Yekaterinburg, with his wife Anastasia.

Marinelli spearheaded the Calexit campaign for nearly two years before deciding to settle in Russia permanently in April. He withdrew his petition for a referendum at that point in favor of the "new happiness" he'd found in Yekaterinburg.

The organization relaunched in August, this time as "a movement" rather than a political action committee, Marinelli said Monday. It also has a new president: cofounder Marcus Ruiz Evans, who previously served as the organization's vice president.

Evans closed the Moscow "embassy" Marinelli had established in December, calling it "a distraction, a point of contention, and a source of division among supporters of California independence."

Louis MarinelliScreenshot/YouTube

In his statement on Monday, Marinelli claimed it was never really an embassy at all.

"I hyped it up, printed a vinyl banner, and called it an embassy - that was a mistake," he wrote.

Marinelli characterized the initiative differently back in December, telling Business Insider that the "Embassy of the Independent Republic of California" was part of the group's outreach to countries that were likely to recognize and support California's independence.

He described Russia's Anti-Globalization Movement far-right Russian nationalists who enjoy Kremlin support while promoting secessionist movements in Europe and the United States as a "partner," and said Yes California aimed to "rock the boat and ruffle feathers."

Now, Marinelli says he "never sought to have Russia as a partner in the Calexit campaign in the first place."

"Pursuing their recognition of our independence after the fact is not endorsing our Calexit campaign," he said.

The link among Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, and Russia has always been murky. The US intelligence community believes the three worked together to undermine Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election, while Assange has staunchly denied that Russia was its source for hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign.

But as journalist and Russia researcher Casey Michel has written, the Kremlin has not exactly been an unbiased observer of Western independence movements. Marinelli's former "partner," the Anti-Globalization Movement of Russia, issued a statement last month supporting Catalonia's secession push.

Assange turned his attention to Spain around the same time, becoming the de-facto international spokesman for Catalan separatism.

He taught young Catalans how to use encrypted chat apps and evade detection from federal police ahead of the October 1 independence referendum, and he used his Twitter account to relentlessly pump out a pro-separatist narrative aimed at villainizing the Spanish central government and celebrating Catalan nationalism.

Asked whether he would support a similar independence referendum for Texas or California, Assange said: "Yes. There will likely be a plebiscite in 2018 for California, see #CalExit."

Screenshot/YouTubeIt's not clear whether the government would recognize such a plebiscite as legitimate. A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted after President Donald Trump won the election found that 32% of Californians said they would support independence (another 15.5% said they "don't know").

Asked if he'd "welcome" it if Assange took similarly aggressive measures in support of the Calexit campaign, Marinelli said: "While I stand by my previous statement about Julian Assange and his vocal support for California Independence, the spokesperson for this campaign should be a Californian."

He added, however, that if Assange "has constructive criticism then we should be welcoming constructive criticism and feedback and suggestions on how to run a better campaign."

He also said he was "appreciative" of anyone willing to expose what he perceives as corruption within the national Democratic and Republican parties, which he called "criminal" organizations.

The group's current president, meanwhile, said he is "not a super big fan of Julian Assange."

"I will never coordinate with Assange on CalExit ever," Marcus Ruiz Evans said in an interview on Monday. But he said he's "cool with anybody who's not a racist saying that members of a democracy should have the right to discuss and vote on issues" that affect them.

"There are four separate CalExit groups," Evans said. "I'm part of the oldest and largest one, as is Louis [Marinelli]. The other three don't have Louis on their team and kind of reject him. But because the movement is an idea, no one really has control. If supporters of CalExit love what Assange is saying, I cant control that."

PA Images

Marinelli said on Monday that he wants to "make peace between each of the separatist California Independence groups out there" and "build a big umbrella" that could more effectively campaign for a CalExit.

But it's not clear whether those groups, like the California National Party and the California Freedom Coalition, want anything to do with either Marinelli or Assange.

California National Party secretary Timothy Irvine told Business Insider in a statement that CNP "has no interest in receiving support from foreign groups, foreign nationals, criminals, or generally incompetent and unsavory individuals."

Irvine added that the CNP is "democratically and transparently run by, paid for, and dedicated to serving Californians," and had been "productive" since Marinelli departed California, at which point he was banned from the CNP.

"CNP will not work with, and will refuse support from or association with, individuals who have a track record of political incompetence, of alienating Californians, or of putting their own private interests above the public good of Californians," Irvine said.

The CFC declined to comment.

Originally posted here:
California exit, secession leader welcomes Julian Assange ...

Ecuadorian president threatens to evict Julian Assange from …

By Oscar Grenfell 3 April 2019

In a clear threat to expel Julian Assange from Ecuadors London embassy, the countrys president, Lenn Moreno, declared in an interview yesterday that the WikiLeaks founder had repeatedly violated the conditions of his asylum. Moreno stated that his government would take a decision... in the short term on Assanges circumstances.

The comments are the latest public indication of an advanced conspiracy to force Assange out of the embassy, where he sought political asylum in 2012, and into the clutches of the British and US authorities.

If he leaves the building, or is expelled from it, Assange will be arrested by British authorities on trumped-up bail charges. Assange would likely face extradition to the US over concocted espionage or conspiracy charges, carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment or the death penalty, for his role in WikiLeaks exposure of war crimes, illegal diplomatic intrigues and mass surveillance.

In the interview with the Ecuadorian Radio Broadcasters Association, Moreno made unsubstantiated and slanderous claims that Assange had been hacking... private accounts and phones. He blamed the WikiLeaks founder for a corruption scandal currently engulfing his government.

Morenos allegation that Assange had violated the conditions of his asylum was a reference to a draconian protocol imposed on the WikiLeaks founder by the Ecuadorian government last October, following the shut-off of his internet access and the severe curtailing of his right to receive visitors in March, 2018.

The Ecuadorian president restated the terms of the protocol, forbidding Assange from making any political comments, including about his own plight. Underscoring that Moreno is closely collaborating with the major powers, Al Jazeera reported that he made statements to the effect that Assange cannot intervene in the politics of other countries, especially those with friendly relations with Ecuador.

The Ecuadorian protocol is a flagrant violation of international law. Assanges status as a political refugee has been upheld by the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention and other international rights organisations. There is no basis in international legislation for the political asylum of a journalist and publisher to be made conditional on his or her silencing.

Through much of the interview, Moreno sought to attribute the deepening crisis of his government to the activities of WikiLeaks and Assange. Last month, the contents of Morenos mobile phone and gmail account were sent to an opposition lawmaker and subsequently published online. The leaks and related documents, dubbed the INA papers, allegedly implicate Moreno and his closest associates, including his brother, in corruption, perjury and money laundering.

Senior officials in the Ecuadorian government began blaming Assange for the leaks last week. Moreno continued the theme, absurdly declaring: In WikiLeaks we have seen evidence of spying, intervention in private conversations on phones, including photos of my bedroom, of what I eat, of how my wife and daughters and friends dance.

Today, the Ecuadorian government filed a complaint with the UN Special Rapporteur on Privacy, denouncing WikiLeaks over the corruption scandal. It did so the day before the Rapporteur was due to visit Assange to investigate his claim that Ecuadorian authorities are illegally spying on his communications.

Moreno and the government have not offered any proof for their allegations. They are well aware that Assange does not have internet access, because the government terminated it in March last year. The only evidence of WikiLeaks ties to the INA papers, provided by Morenos supporters, is that the organisations Twitter account, which is not controlled by Assange, tweeted reports and media articles about the revelations.

While Moreno is undoubtedly seeking to scapegoat Assange for his governments crisis, he is also using the publication of the INS papers as the pretext for escalating long-standing plans to evict the WikiLeaks founder from the London embassy. In the interview, Moreno restated his governments position that it would be willing to see Assange exit the building provided only that his life is not endangered.

Since coming to office in May, 2017, the Moreno regime has moved to renege on the previous Ecuadorian governments decision to grant Assange asylum. At the same time, it has rapidly expanded relations with the US.

Fidel Narvez, who was Ecuadors consul to London until 2018, bluntly warned that the interview demonstrated the government seeks a false pretext to end the asylum and protection of Julian Assange. Narvez wrote that Moreno was using the INS scandal to yield to US pressure on Assange.

Morenos comments coincide with a stepped-up US pursuit of the WikiLeaks founder. On March 8, Chelsea Manning was arrested and jailed indefinitely for refusing to testify at a closed-door grand jury hearing aimed at concocting charges against Assange.

Manning, who in 2010 courageously leaked US army war logs and diplomatic cables to WikiLeaks, was imprisoned for seven years under the Obama administration. Now she has been held in solitary confinement by the Trump administration for more than three weeks.

At the same time, the claims of the Democrats, much of the corporate media, and the US intelligence agencies that WikiLeaks collaborated with Donald Trump and Russia in 2016 to deprive Hillary Clinton of the US presidency have been discredited. The Mueller investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government concluded last month without any criminal indictments.

This underscores the fact that the campaign over Russian interference was always a fraudulent pretext for the imposition of sweeping online censorship measures and political repression.

The discrediting of the Democratic Party allegations, however, will not result in any let-up in the campaign against Assange and WikiLeaks. Rather, the Trump administration and its nominal Democratic opponents are increasingly converging in their persecution of dissident publishers and whistleblowers, such as Assange and Manning, and a broader assault on civil liberties.

This is demonstrated by the fact that no figure from the US political establishment has raised a word of protest over the attacks against Assange. The corporate press and all of the official political parties in Britain and Australia have similarly signalled their support for the jailing of Manning and the US-led vendetta targeting Assange.

Representing a tiny corporate and financial elite, all of them see the suppression of free speech and democratic rights as critical to preventing the emergence of a mass political movement of the working class under conditions of a resurgence of the class struggle and widespread hostility to war, austerity and authoritarianism.

Morenos statements underscore the urgency of stepping up the fight for Assanges freedom and for the immediate release of Manning. The Socialist Equality parties in Australia and the US held powerful demonstrations last month to rally workers, students and young people to this crucial fight. We urge all readers of the WSWS who want to take up the struggle to free Assange and Manning to contact us.

Excerpt from:
Ecuadorian president threatens to evict Julian Assange from ...

Ecuador’s president says Assange breached terms of London …

QUITO (Reuters) - President Lenin Moreno of Ecuador told radio stations on Tuesday that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has repeatedly violated the terms of his asylum in the Andean nations London embassy, where he has lived for nearly seven years.

FILE PHOTO: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is seen on the balcony of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, Britain, May 19, 2017. REUTERS/Peter Nicholls

Moreno, interviewed by the Ecuadorean Radio Broadcasters Association, said Assange does not have the right to hack private accounts or phones and cannot intervene in the politics of other countries, especially those that have friendly relations with Ecuador.

Attorneys for Assange did not respond to requests for comment.

Moreno made the comments on Assange after private photographs of him and his family at a time years ago when they were living in Europe circulated on social media. Although Moreno stopped short of explicitly blaming Assange for the leak, the government said it believed the photos were shared by WikiLeaks.

Mr. Assange has violated the agreement we reached with him and his legal counsel too many times, Moreno said in the interview in the city of Guayaquil. It is not that he cannot speak and express himself freely, but he cannot lie, nor much less hack private accounts or phones.

Moreno did not say whether or not the government would take steps to remove Assange from the embassy.

WikiLeaks said in an emailed statement that Morenos remarks were in retribution for WikiLeaks having reported on corruption accusations against Moreno, who denies wrongdoing.

If President Moreno wants to illegally terminate a refugee publishers asylum to cover up an offshore corruption scandal, history will not be kind, WikiLeaks said.

Assange took refuge in Ecuadors London embassy in 2012 to avoid being extradited to Sweden, where authorities wanted to question him as part of a sexual assault investigation.

That probe was later dropped, but Assange fears he could be extradited to face charges in the United States, where federal prosecutors are investigating WikiLeaks.

Ecuador last year established new rules for Assanges behavior while in the embassy, which required him to pay his medical bills and clean up after his pet cat. He challenged the rules in local and international tribunals, arguing they violated his human rights. Both courts ruled against him.

Last month, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, which is linked to the Organization of American States, rejected Assanges request that Ecuador ease the conditions it has imposed on his residence in the London embassy.

Assange says Ecuador is seeking to end his asylum and is putting pressure on him by isolating him from visitors and spying on him. Ecuador has said its treatment of Assange was in line with international law, but that his situation cannot be extended indefinitely.

Reporting by Alexandra Valencia, Brian Ellsworth and Luc Cohen; Additional reporting by Mark Hosenball in Washington; editing by Grant McCool

Excerpt from:
Ecuador's president says Assange breached terms of London ...

WikiLeaks: US Intel Report on Russia Hacking ‘Has Poor …

US

03:58 07.01.2017Get short URL

The US intelligence community report alleging that Russian hackers interfered in the 2016 presidential election lacks evidence and quality sources, WikiLeaks said in a statement.

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) A public version ofthe comprehensive intelligence report assessing Russian activities and intentions inthe 2016 US presidential elections was released onFriday.

The released report has poor sourcing and no evidence, WikiLeaks stated ina Twitter post onFriday.

Earlier onFriday, the US Intelligence Community released a public version ofthe comprehensive intelligence report assessing Russian activities and intentions related tothe 2016 US presidential election.

The whistleblower organization pointed outhow mainstream American media outlets have even slammed the report forits lack ofsubstance.

The New York Times said inan article onFriday afterthe report was released that, "the declassified report contained no information abouthow the agencies had collected their data or had come totheir conclusions."

Russia has repeatedly denied the US allegations calling them absurd and characterizing them asan attempt todivert public opinion fromrevelations ofcorruption aswell asother pressing domestic issues.

Never miss a story again sign upto our Telegram channel and we'll keep you upto speed!

Continue reading here:
WikiLeaks: US Intel Report on Russia Hacking 'Has Poor ...

Oliver Stone on Edward Snowden: "America Is Fed Bullshit and …

Edward Snowden was given no script approval, nor did he receive any payment for Snowden, says director Oliver Stone. His new movie tells the story of the former NSA operative and how he came to reveal that the U.S. government was secretly monitoring domestic telephone calls.

The 69-year-old filmmaker and renegade met after Snowden's Russian lawyer "contacted me because he wanted to sell me his book, which he had written about Snowden," said Stone. "But it was a fictional book. He had fictionalized it. And it was an interesting Russian novel. Very Dostoevsky. Really it's about a young man from America who comes over and reveals a 1984 world. I didn't know at that point in time whether we were going to make a fictional movie with an unnamed character, or else we would make the story as realistic as possible about Snowden, because I didn't know if Snowden would cooperate."

The lawyer arranged a meeting in Moscow, in a secure place that Stone would not reveal. At first, he said, Snowden was wary. "I don't think he was comfortable with the idea of a movie at that point. He's into reality and the concept of a movie is so foreign to him. I think he had seen a piece of The Untold History of the United States, which I'd done. That was that 12-part series. And I think he was impressed with it."

After more meetings took place, Stone said, Snowden began to thaw. "[He] got warmer. It took time." In the end, he agreed to take part because "he accepted in his heart that a movie would get made," Stone noted. "And he said that it was sort of an inevitability about a movie getting made, that he doesn't have any rights because he's in exile, and so forth and so on."

The three-time Oscar winner behind such movies as Platoon, Born on the Fourth of July and Wall Street, blamed the studios' corporate ownership for the fact that none agreed to finance the picture. "The biggest problem in the end turned out to be the self-censorship of scared American corporations," Stone said. "And that's the truth about our society. At the price we were offering, and the script the way it was, it's very hard to believe [that there wasn't] a political factor [in denying the project financing]."

Stone was interviewed Aug. 26 at Loyola Marymount University's School of Film and Television, where he was the first guest in the sixth season of the Hollywood Masters interview series. Other guests this season will include actors Annette Bening, Ewan McGregor and Andrew Garfield, producer Brian Grazer, Fox TV executive Dana Walden, and French superstar Isabelle Huppert.

In a wide-ranging conversation about his work, Stone also recalled working with Donald Trump in a scene for Wall Street that subsequently was deleted from the movie.

"He was good," said Stone. "I have no complaint. There were a lot of demands. I mean, he had two pages of prerequisites: You couldn't shoot him from this side, that side. But I talked to him, and he's a charming man in person. As an actor, he was stunning. You know, we did take one with Michael [Douglas] and [Trump] talking in a barbershop. And he jumped up after the take and he said, 'Wasn't that great?'" In the end, Stone chose to cut the scene. "It was too late and too little for where we were, at that point in the movie. And I wasn't thinking about his future presidency I was just dealing with an editing issue. I should have left it in probably."

An edited transcript of the interview follows.

STEPHEN GALLOWAYJune 1971. You had been at NYU Film School for a couple of years. Learning from Martin Scorsese, among others.

OLIVER STONEAmong others. Yeah.

GALLOWAY And now you are out in the cold world. Nobody knows who you are. You have just made a short film, which, by the way, you can see on YouTube. It's very good, about Vietnam. What is your thinking about your career and what you want to do with the rest of your life?

STONE It was more like a starvation diet at that point. There was no choice involved. You could either choose to go on, or else you drop out. A lot of people did. They realized that there was no real business, so to speak, you know, when you formally get hired. During our school year, the last year, all of us had been trying to do things. I had worked at Channel 13, and those days, that was the WNET. I think it was the public station. I'd worked on a wonderful novel that was filmed with a bunch of actors like Cornelia Otis Skinner, Gary Merrill, old timers. And it was great. Jack Gilford. It was a great experience to be a PA. And various things like that. I had been a cab driver, night time, and I went more and more into cab driving when I graduated. Night times in New York. That was an experience.

GALLOWAY Was that a good or bad experience?

STONE It was both. (Laughs.) Both. But you know, over the next three, four years, there were no jobs. I kept writing scripts and getting the jobs that I could. Worked on a porno film as an associate producer.

GALLOWAY What was the name of the porno film?

STONE Carrying dollies up four, five flights of stairs. In those days we

GALLOWAY Do you remember the name of the film?

STONE I'd rather forget it. (Laughter.)

GALLOWAY Go on. You know the name. (Laughter.)

STONE But there were things like that. And I got a job finally. One of the jobs I got that was pretty steady, and gave me a beautiful unemployment insurance, was at a sports film company making baseball films. They were contracted to Major League Baseball. And it was a good contract. But they wanted to expand into advertising. And I was not an expert at advertising. I wasn't very good at selling either, so I sold nothing practically for a year. But I pretended to sell or tried. But I was writing scripts mostly during that whole period in the back office and such. And I was unsuccessful as a scriptwriter, I have to tell you, but I kept at it. There must have been seven, eight, nine scripts in there. And treatments, long treatments. Always hopeful. Heartbreaking. Not read. Took forever to read. You know, I wanted to get them to people like Charles Bronson and Lee Marvin, and some of the actors. And it just wasn't working out. But of course, my choice of subject matter may have something to do with it. I don't know. But that business was tough. In the early '70s, it was very tough, because they weren't making as many movies I think. That was one of the problems. Really, it started to change in the early '80s, when the video revolution came in. That allowed those smaller films to be made that we have all seen in the years since. But it was a hard market. I ran into a couple of NYU graduates down at the garage where the taxis were. And all their grandiose dreams. Some of them had money. Some of them were shooting their own films with the money. It was tough.

GALLOWAY What did Scorsese teach you?

STONE It was one year, the first year. Basic production. And we made films that were primitive and crude. Basic motions. I would say, what they called Sight and Sound. That was the name of it. It was 60 seconds, film. You started with a black and white film, 16 mm, and then you worked your way up to five minutes, maybe. Or three minutes. And these were exercises, and generally Marty criticized them pretty well. I mean, he cared. He was passionate. But it was hopeless for him. It was a graveyard. He knew that. And I think he was writing or he was working on projects at that time. But he would come in dutifully every time we had the class. And you could see he hadn't slept very well at night. Because in those days, there was no [VCRs]. And older films were available on TV in the morning time, around 2 o'clock, 3 o'clock, 4 o'clock, you'd see the classics. And that was one of the few ways you could see older films. Unless you'd go to the theater up on 98th Street. So he would always be exhausted. He would talk a mile a minute. And it was hard to understand some of what he said.

GALLOWAY He talks incredibly quickly.

STONE Yeah. And I mean, his hair was down to here, and you could barely see his eyes in the morning. But he was a good teacher, and inspiring. You know, Haig Manoogian was there.

GALLOWAY The dean of the school.

STONE A lot of good teachers. My screenwriting class, I just have to say, was empty. The young people then did not really believe in writing. It was like, put the script together on the spot, like Jean-Luc Godard, go out and shoot. So I was surprised at the lack of attention to that discipline, which I loved, the old screenwriters.

GALLOWAY How did you learn to write? You had written a 1,400-page novel.

STONE I'd written a novel before, when I

GALLOWAY It wasn't published.

STONE Yeah. I was an older student. I came back from Vietnam at that point. And I had written a novel at 19, which was published 30 years later. It's called Child's Night Dream. And it's about being 19. So I cared about writing, but I had written a novel, and how to visualize it into a cinematic approach is a whole different ballgame.

GALLOWAY And so who taught you? Or where did you learn? From watching films? Or did somebody guide you?

STONE Well, that's what we were doing at NYU. You know, first of all, the concept was you can make films. I mean, you would take that for granted now, but back then it was a very special, exotic colony. You didn't join it that easily. And certainly anybody who went to Hollywood, like Marty went with AIP, I think, that was a big deal. We didn't have connections. Now it's changed. Back then, you had to get in by commercials if you could. Or the writing, [which] worked for me. And it took six years, seven years.

GALLOWAY You made two films, The Hand andSeizure, before you made the film that you consider your first feature, Salvador, which is still one of my favorite films of yours.

STONE Yeah. I love that one.

GALLOWAY What did you learn from the first two that helped you make the third one?

STONE Oh Years. I learned years, you know. The first one was a horror film, Seizure, in 1973. And I did it with very little money. And we had a tremendous amount of problems. It was a real first-time film effort. Very funny stories, of course, with Seizure. It was called Queen of Evil, but we had to change the title. Our film had many legal problems, and it was seized. I mean, I had to seize the film back from the cinematographer in Montreal. And I called the film Seizure. (Laughter.)

GALLOWAY How did you seize it back?

STONE Oh God. It's complicated. The Mounties were involved. Bills. I mean, we had a lot of unpaid bills and we had to sneak it across the border to show the work print. It was a nightmare. We finally got secured by Harold Greenberg, who was a gigantic whale of a man, who had the Bellevue Path Lab in Montreal. He basically swallowed the film, and it disappeared into a 42ndStreet double bill as a Cinerama release. But it's actually an interesting film, if you look at it. I don't know if you have seen it.

GALLOWAY I haven't. No.

STONE It was released on video. It's very interesting. It's similar to the theme of The Hand, which is basically an artist, a cartoonist, who has tremendous problems with his imagination. And he projects some of the worst nightmares possible. And it happens to him. Sort of a Cavalcanti film, Alberto Cavalcanti. Dead of Night. That kind of a thing.

GALLOWAY How have you changed as a director since then?

STONE More complex and more mature. I think better with using the camera, using the scenes, directing actors, in every way. I mean, you grow. You grow from your experience. You have to do it. And by the time I made Salvador, I'd been through a lot of heartbreak. I mean, I'd already won an Academy Award for [writing]Midnight Express in '79. And then had a rough spot with The Hand, because The Hand was actually an interesting movie. Again, but the producers were putting a tremendous amount of pressure on me to make it more of a horror film, and less of a psychological horror film. And that was a problem. I, you know, had to photograph the hand 100 different ways. It was an externalization of the character's inner life. And that was always what it was. It wasn't supposed to exist independently. But you know Hollywood. They want it to exist independently. But to have to shoot an object that's very small and make it dangerous is extremely difficult. It's like trying to make a mouse into an elephant. But I had Carlo Rambaldi doing special effects. Wonderfully precise man, but the only problem was he hated my DP, because he said my DP couldn't light his hands. And we had 50, 60 hands in there and we were trying to do very complex stuff. And we did some very good stuff. We still see it. But it was a very difficult film for a first feature, second feature.

GALLOWAY You mentioned Midnight Express, which became a very controversial film. [To the audience:] I don't know if you've seen it, but it's a film I love. Even before you were known as a director, you were known as the writer of Midnight Express, which offended a great part of the Turkish population. I think Amnesty International complained about its portrayal of Turks as villains. This is a story about Billy Hayes' experiences in a Turkish prison. Alan Parker, the director, has subsequently sort of apologized for the film. How do you feel about it?

STONE I've never apologized for it. I said, "I'm sorry about this misunderstanding." But this was a serious misunderstanding here. This film, for me, was based on injustice everywhere. And it was a worldwide issue. Certainly, in the United States. I had been in prison briefly, but it was a horrifying experience. For a drug, federal smuggling charge. And a lot of that passion went into the screenplay. And I felt that the it was really the early drug war. I felt that this treatment of people who were taking drugs was outrageous and still do. Very angry about it. And I made a film about it, too, at one point called Savages, later.

GALLOWAY Which I love.

STONE But this was an early reflection of that. And I made a speech at the Golden Globes, which I had won that year. And I was saying, "This is not about Turkey. This is about the United States. When you people who make television shows here in the United States are always doing the same cliche. You're glorifying the cop. And you're making the drug dealer something evil and much worse than he is." And I got booed off the stage.

GALLOWAY Wow. Really?

STONE Well, I was high, frankly, but (Laughter.) My publicist tried for years to destroy the tape, but I think it still exists. And I know it does.

GALLOWAY When you were in prison, they found two ounces of marijuana on you or something?

STONE Something like that. Yeah.

GALLOWAY Were you in prison in San Diego?

STONE Oh, we have to go to that! Yeah. You like the interesting juicy stuff, but

GALLOWAY I knew you would knock me for that, but you know it's interesting. So since I'm asking that question, tell us about it.

STONE Which one?

GALLOWAY About that prison experience.

STONE Oh, come on. Really?

GALLOWAY Of course.

STONE We're talking about movies, not

GALLOWAY [To audience:] You want to know about this?

AUDIENCEYes!

STONE I was coming back from Mexico, and I had just come back from Vietnam, about seven days. Hadn't even called my parents to tell them I was back. I was really one of those guys from Vietnam who was coming back from a lot of combat. And I was taking psychedelics at that point, just trying to get used to the world again. But it wasn't a world that I had recognized. And the experience of veterans coming back, you know, was difficult. So I left the country. And partied in Mexico. And came back, and I was arrested [in San Diego]. And it was scary, because there were two judges. One was a five- to 20-year[s in prison] judge, and the other one was a parole judge, who would give you five years on parole, you know, and you wouldn't even serve. So it was like, "What day do you go up in front of the judge?" And there was no representation. They never came at that point. The prisons in San Diego were feeling the early drug war. And it was overcrowded. Three times too many inmates. It was a very eye-opening experience, and another side of America that I had never seen before. So between the infantry and the prison, and between the Merchant Marine I started to see the world in a different way than I'd grown up.

GALLOWAY You said something interesting, which most people wouldn't think. And you just mentioned this was a scary experience. You said a lot of what you were dealing with when you were young was fear, and that you yourself still deal with fear, and you're still afraid.

STONE Ha. When did I say that to you?

GALLOWAY You didn't say it to me. I think you said it in the book [The Oliver Stone Experience].

STONE Gosh. This is a very good journalist, I have to tell you. (Laughter.) This man, he digs.

GALLOWAY Thank you. Tell us about that.

STONE I have to say, I was shocked when you told me you read this book, which just came out. Because you know, it's a big book, and you really prepared. [To audience:] But he's taken you far ahead and far deeper into things that you may not understand of

GALLOWAY I appreciate that. But let's not avoid the question. Fear. Do you still feel that?

STONE Yes. I do. I do. I think that's an inherent quality in all people. I mean, I think it's a fear that's deeper now than it ever was. Sure. But I've come to terms with it. It's a beast that you face every day. And being older gives me some advantages over it.

GALLOWAY By the way, the other thing you said that was interesting, you gave the commencement address at the University of Connecticut, I think in May. And you said, "I've been to four colleges." Yale, from which you dropped out. NYU. I think the third one was Hollywood, but the fourth one was the College of Older Age.

STONE Yeah.

GALLOWAY And that really interested me. Because you have mellowed somewhat, I think. True?

STONE Yes. (Laughter.)

GALLOWAY You may elaborate.

STONE You know, this is very personal stuff. I feel like you're a psychiatrist.

GALLOWAY (Laughs.) And I promised your assistant I wasn't going to go down this path

STONE I don't even know you and

GALLOWAY Let's go back to the film that really put you on the map. And I'm going to show an excerpt from this truly brilliant film. Be warned. It's a very violent scene, but it's an extraordinary film. Watching it again is even better than when I saw it when it came out. So let's take a look at a sequence from Platoon.

[CLIP]

[APPLAUSE]

STONE That's a strong scene.

GALLOWAY How do you feel watching it?

STONE Whew. I feel terrible. What do you want me to say? I mean, it's not a pretty scene, but it's accurate, not in the exact details, but it's a condensation of many of the things that happened over there. And happen in every war that we're fighting since World War II, it seems. And maybe even then. You know, when you're in a country that you're not invited into, and you're white, and it's a Third World country, the infantry gets very divided, and whatever they say about "Support the troops," you know, the truth is some of the troops should not be supported. People go over there and they get out their anxieties and their fears, and they blame anybody outside themselves. They don't look in. And they look out. And they often take it out on people who have no ability to speak the language and so forth and so on. In some cases, invalids and people who are stupid, or ... retarded, mentally challenged. And it happened in some form to me. And there was a guy like this guy Kevin Dillon plays who existed in the platoon I was in. No names, but there were all kinds of acts of homicide that were done not overtly, and not in front of officers, but that happened like in a situation like that. Where it would be covered up by a cowardly sergeant who was a bully. You saw the sergeant, the John C.McGinley character.

GALLOWAY In fact, he's in four of your films

STONE This brings it all together. And it also, one detail that you should remember. In these situations and this is like true for Iraq and Afghanistan when you go to these places, these villages, they are often collaborating with the enemy. Yes. Why not? Because they are in an impossible situation. They're getting pressure from the insurgent side or the native side. They're getting a lot of pressure. And here comes the U.S. And here we are saying, "You got to work with us." And then guys get very pissed off because they find supplies in those villages. Or let's say they know where the booby traps are, this, that. There's 100 ways you can collaborate. They collaborate because they have no choice. They're in the middle of a mess.

GALLOWAY You were 21 when you went to Vietnam. You volunteered. I think you actually missed your 21stbirthday because you crossed the international dateline.

STONE Yeah. I got robbed. (Laughter.) But I stay forever young.

GALLOWAY What possessed you to do that?

STONE Possessed me? Well, you've read the book [The Oliver Stone Experience] Obviously, I was a bit like Ron Kovic, a lot like Ron Kovic. I believed in the fight against communism. My father had been Republican. I grew up conservative. And in 1950s New York, you had to believe that the communist conspiracy was about to engulf the United States. You just had to. That was the way we were raised. And it was all-American. It was very much like it is now in a certain sense. Engaged in a cold war in which we certainly invented the enemy, or exaggerated him to the point at which he was, as Joe McCarthy said, you know, about to take over our government and all this stuff. And we went to that war, many of us, in that belief. I was completely alienated and shocked when I returned and didn't know where I was. Took me a while to straighten, to get back into society. Going back to NYU Film School about nine months later was part of it. It was a very shaky time. Talk about fear. We had a lot of fear, you know, about life, about coming back to American society that you don't recognize. Nobody cared about Vietnam. I mean, only the poor went there. I mean, I would say in the officer class, and most of the young people did not go. They had deferments. So you're not dealing with your own people. You don't have that camaraderie. No one understands what you're doing over there. They think it's a bummer. They think it's lost time. And too bad, you know. Move on.

GALLOWAY You were pretty badly wounded in Vietnam. You were shot I think in the neck. And you still have shrapnel there?

STONE I was not seriously wounded, thank God. I was hit twice, yes. And both times I was scared. Yeah. First time I thought I was going to die because there was a lot of blood, in the neck. And the second time I got blown up by a satchel charge. And I'm OK. But I got out of the field briefly, and I stayed out for a while, but I couldn't stand the rear, and I ended up getting into I go into the details in this book. But I always had problems with authority in the army, you know, because you're being bossed around by people like John McGinley, stuff like that. So I ended up back in the field. They were going to Article 15 me, which is put me basically in detention, and put me in a jail there. Another jail. And then I would extend my stay. I'd come out of jail, and I'd have to go back to the field for the same amount of time.

GALLOWAY God.

STONE You know, they really think it through. It was called LBJ, the prison.

GALLOWAY Wow. (Laughs.)

STONE It was named Long Binh Jail, but LBJ were the initials for Lyndon Johnson, who was the antihero of the time. Anyway...

GALLOWAY Are you still anti-authority?

STONE You bet. (Laughter.) You bet.

GALLOWAY That's interesting. Is there any authority that you're not anti?

STONE I've been having problems with that through my whole life, as you can tell from my films and some of my documentaries, too. I really think that we don't think for ourselves. I think many of us are sleepwalking. Many of us buy the lies. So I tend to be contrary and think for myself as much as possible. And sometimes I don't. But I was going back to something you said earlier, but I forgot what it was.

Read the original post:
Oliver Stone on Edward Snowden: "America Is Fed Bullshit and ...

A Year of Silencing Julian Assange Consortiumnews

On this date in 2018, the Wikileaks publisher was cut off from the work of journalism, reports Elizabeth Vos.

By Elizabeth VosSpecial to Consortium News

One year ago Thursday, Ecuadors government under President Lenin Moreno silenced Julian Assange.

WikiLeaks wrote on Twitter Wednesday: March 28, marks one year that WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange has been illegally gagged from doing journalismany writing that expresses a political opinion? even on his own treatment, after pressure from the U.S. on Ecuador.

On this date in 2018 Moreno imposed on Assange what Human Rights Watchs legal counsel Dinah Pokempner described as looking more and more like solitary confinement. Moreno cut off Assanges online access and restricted visitors to the Ecuador embassy in London where Assange has had legal political asylum since 2012.

Moreno cited Assanges critical social media remarks about Ecuadors allies, the U.S. and Spain. Assanges near-total isolation, with the exception of visits from legal counsel during week days, has been augmented by the Ecuadorian governments imposition of a complex protocol, which, although eased slightly in recent months in respect of visits allowed, has not improved Assanges overall status over the last 12 months. In some respects, it seems to have worsened.

WikiLeaks Courage Foundation described the terms of the protocol:

Explicit threats to revoke Julians asylum if he, or any visitors, breach or are perceived to breach, any of the 28 rules in the protocol. The protocol forbids Julian from undertaking journalism and expressing his opinions, under threat of losing his asylum. The rules also state that the embassy can seize Julians property or his visitors property and hand these to the UK police, and report visitors to the UK authorities. The protocol also requires visitors to provide the IMEI codes and serial numbers of electronic devices used inside the embassy, and states that this private information may be shared with undisclosed agencies.

The protocol does not spell out all the restrictions imposed on Assange and his supporters over the last year. A bombshell report by Cassandra Fairbanks on Tuesday revealed Ecuadors demand that Assange and his lawyer be scanned before entering a highly bugged and monitored conference room with a journalist.

Describing her experience, Fairbanks said she had been: Locked in a cold, surveilled room for over an hour by Ecuadorian officials, as a furious argument raged between the countrys ambassador and Julian Assange.

The argument reportedly centered on Assanges refusal to submit to a body scan in order to enter the conference room, where Fairbanks waited. Fairbanks reported that Assange shouted at the Ecuadorian ambassador, accusing the latter of acting as an agent of the United States government. The ambassador then told Assange to shut up, she reported.

WikiLeaks, writing via social media, has confirmed the factual elements of Fairbanks story.

Subject to Body Scans

Assange and his lawyers are now subjected to body scans in addition to conditions that, in the opinion of Ecuadors former President Rafael Correa, already amounted to torture. In his argument with the ambassador, Assange protested that he was being treated like a prisoner and not a political asylee.

Assanges supporters have claimed that rather than risk a public-relations fallout by removing Assange from the embassy by force, the U.S., UK and Ecuador are acting to hasten Assanges physical and mental demise in hopes he will be forced to leave the embassy or become incapacitated.

WikiLeaks new Editor-in-Chief Kristinn Hrafnsson told RT in a televised interview: We, of course, know that Lenin Moreno in Ecuador is willing to sacrifice Julian Assange for debt relief, that was reported by The New York Timesin early December.

The Courage Foundation summarized Assanges plight:

Julian Assange is the only publisher and journalist in the EU formally found to be arbitrarily detained by the UN human rights system. He is in dire circumstances, faces imminent termination of his asylum, extradition and life in a US prison for publishing the truth about US wars, and has been gagged and isolated since 28 March 2018. He has been kept in the UK from his young family in France for eight years (where he lived before being arbitrarily detained in the UK), has not seen the sun for almost seven years, and has been found by the United Nations to be subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

On Thursday Ecuadors foreign minister threatened additional firm and sustained measures against Assange after reports on the offshore scandal involving the president and his brother, WikiLeaks tweeted.

Since Assange was cut off from the outside world, efforts by the United States to prosecute Assange and WikiLeakshave been exposed. That Assange had already been charged was inadvertently revealed by a cut-and-paste error by the U.S. attorneys office of the Eastern District of Virginia. The prosecution of the publisher pertains to WikiLeaksChelsea Manning-era publications, and possibly Vault 7, not to the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Manning Back in Jail

Thursday also marks the passage of Mannings third week of imprisonment for her refusal to testify before a grand jury convened to prosecute WikiLeaks and Assange. Since being jailed, Mannings supporters have reported that she has been kept in solitary confinement, where she will remain indefinitely until either the grand jury is disbanded or she agrees to testify without legal counsel and under a veil of secrecy.

Presumably, prosecutors hope to coerce Manning to backtrack on her testimony during her court-martial in 2013, in which she testified she acted alone, and instead indicate that Assange worked to incite or aid her in retrieving leaked material. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges described the situation as the new inquisition.

The end of the collusion conspiracy theory came as a victory for Assange and WikiLeaks. Special Counsel Robert Mueller made it clear there would be no indictments against either for their roles during the 2016 election.

However, the damage has been significant, with Assange unable to comment and WikiLeaks saddled with residual, unresolved smears. Over the last three years, cable news pundits endlessly vilified WikiLeaks and Assange by claiming the publisher coordinated with the Trump presidential campaign and became an instrument of the Kremlin in 2016.

Meanwhile, The Guardian has allowed its outlandish story alleging that secret meetings took place between Assange and Paul Manafort in Ecuadors London embassy three times between 2013 and 2016 to go un-retracted and unexplained. WikiLeaks has called the story an intentional front page fabrication, and launched a Gofundme campaign to raise funds to sue the newspaper. Hrafnsson confirmed the lawsuit is progressing.

On March 28 last year, friends and supporters of Assange spontaneously came together on hearing the news that he had been cut off from the outside world by the Ecuadorian government. For more than 10 hours, participants and viewers from across the planet raised their voices to protest the injustice of Assange having been gagged.

The initial Reconnect Julian event led to subsequent Unity4J vigils. Over the past 12 months, demonstrations of support have unfolded across the globe, including many events organized by the Socialist Equality Party and a plethora of unaffiliated actions in solidarity with Assange.

The WikiLeaks founders mother, Christine Assange, wrote via social media: At critical times throughout history, leaders have emerged to lead the fight for freedom. They risk their lives and liberty to do so. Most of us dont have their courage, but we can unite to protect them.#FreeAssange#FreeManning

Earlier Thursday, trucks emblazoned with supportive messages for Assange and Manning appeared in London and Washington, D.C.

Elizabeth Vos is a freelance journalist and contributor to Consortium News.

If you value this original article, please consider making a donation to Consortium News so we can bring you more stories like this one.

Continue reading here:
A Year of Silencing Julian Assange Consortiumnews

Free Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning! – World Socialist …

28 March 2019

The fate of Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning, political prisoners victimized by US and world imperialism for exposing imperialist crimes and conspiracies, must be a focus of attention of the entire working class and all those who defend democratic rights.

Today marks one full year since WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange was cut off from the internet and his ability to communicate with the outside world. Assange remains confined to the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he was granted political asylum in 2012. There he is subject to constant and invasive surveillance.

Assange confronts the terrible choice of remaining trapped under conditions where he cannot communicate his views or protest his treatment, or leaving the embassy to be arrested by British police and face extradition to the US, where he faces trumped-up charges of espionage.

Underscoring the danger Assange faces, WikiLeaks last week drew attention to the fact that a US Department of Justice aircraft that was previously used for rendering alleged Russian hacker Yevgeniy Nikulin to the US last year had flown to London, only to return on Saturday. The dispatch of the plane was accompanied by an unexplained increase in the presence of plainclothes police officers around the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

Tomorrow will also mark three weeks since Chelsea Manning, who in 2010 provided WikiLeaks with documents exposing US war crimes, was jailed for contempt of court by a federal judge. Mannings alleged crime is refusing to testify in a secret grand jury hearing against Assange. She is being held in solitary confinement, isolated 22 hours a day.

Manning faces another round of indefinite detention following her imprisonment for seven years under the Obama administration, in conditions the United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture called cruel, inhuman and degrading.

The fate of Manning and Assange has gone virtually unreported by major news outlets. It has produced no protests from the American political establishment. Not a single Democratic member of Congress, including Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, has spoken about Mannings imprisonment, let alone opposed it. The editorial board of the New York Times and its hypocritical columnists, who seize on alleged human rights violations when it serves the interests of American imperialism, are silent.

The Trump administration is leading the persecution of Assange and Manning. But its vindictive and unconstitutional vendetta is supported and abetted by the Democratic Party and its associated media outlets.

For more than two years, the Democrats, the New York Times and the Washington Post promoted the lie that WikiLeaks colluded with the Trump campaign and Russia to steal the presidency for Donald Trump. The media, based on unproven assertions by the US intelligence agencies, declared that WikiLeaks knowingly received hacked emails from the Russian government and conspired with the Trump campaign to weaponize this information against Trumps opponent, Hillary Clinton.

The conclusion of the Mueller investigation has exposed the entire edifice of media lies that formed the basis of the anti-Russia witch hunt. Not only the charges of collusion, but the whole framework of the anti-Russia (and anti-WikiLeaks) campaign stands exposed as a fraud.

Meanwhile, genuine journalists like Assange, who do what journalists are supposed to doinform the public and expose the secrets, lies and crimes of the governmentare being hounded and persecuted.

With the collapse of the collusion narrative, there is a growing convergence between the Trump administration, which has declared war on socialism, and its political opponents in the Democratic Party, which seeks to portray the growth of left-wing and socialist sentiment in the United States as the result of Russian meddling.

Their common agenda is an attack on democratic rights, including free speech, which finds its highestor most criminalexpression in the persecution of Assange and Manning.

The complicity of the Democratic Party, the New York Times and the rest of the corporate media in the persecution of Manning and Assange is not surprising. One can expect nothing less from these defenders of US imperialism and conduits for the CIA and the Pentagon.

So too with the organizations of the middle-class pseudo-left that orbit the Democratic Party, which have maintained their silence on Assanges imprisonment after demanding that he face justice over trumped-up sexual abuse allegations that were eventually dropped by prosecutors.

The World Socialist Web Site is waging a campaign to win the freedom of Assange and Manning. Earlier this month, the Socialist Equality Party (SEP) of Australia held rallies in Sydney and Melbourne, each attracting hundreds of demonstrators. The Sydney rally featured leading journalists John Pilger and Joe Lauria, as well as civil rights leader Professor Stuart Rees, to demand Assanges immediate and safe return to Australia.

Over the past two weeks, the SEP in the United States has held rallies and meetings opposing the jailing of Manning.

Speaking to the rally in Sydney, SEP (Australia) National Secretary James Cogan declared, Julian is a class war prisoner. His persecution is above all an attack on the working class. He added, The Trotskyist movement, the WSWS and the SEP, is committed to mobilizing the working class in defense of not only Julian, but all democratic rights, as an essential component of the struggle to achieve genuine social equality, to oppose war and to oppose capitalism.

As workers opposition grows throughout the world, from the masses of North Africa to Uber drivers in Los Angeles and auto workers in the US and Europe, Cogans concluding words bear repeating: We are sending a clear message to Julian Assange today and he will hear it: You are not alone, you have not been abandoned, you have not been forgotten. You will be freed.

Andre Damon

Original post:
Free Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning! - World Socialist ...

15 Best Websites for Downloading Open Source Software

Open source software mainly is known as (OSS) is used as an open development process. Linux has a lot of open source software. Open source software is licensed software that you will have the codes to modify it. However, there are many websites where you can download open source software for your Linux, but it is a little bit difficult for you to find these websites for downloading OSS.

Today I am here to share with you some websites where you can download free Open Source Software without any cost. You can bookmark them if you want. This list is not as per any ranking or popularity, just random sequence. So lets start.

SourceForge is known as one of the best websites to provide free open source software. It will be your premier resource to have open source projects at all. This website has 30 million monthly users containing 500000 open source projects. You can download a lot of open source projects from its homepage. There is a search option there which help you to choose your best open source software at all.

You can easily see the favorite download lists of open source software that will help you to determine which one is better for you.You will also see the licensed software based on your operating system. If you are a registered member of SourceForge, you can write a review of the apps like as Google Play Store or App Store.

In 2013-14 SourceForge ran the software downloading process with Adware. But when it is owned by Slashdot media, software downloading remains free of cost and Ads free at the same time. The president of SourceForge declared that SourceForge would have a modern look and will become more user-friendly.

SourceForge Website

BitBucket is just like GitHub where users can host their development project. But it hosts both public and private open source project. So you can understand that it offers a versatile project management system for the private uses. But up to 5 users, its free. More than 480000 application repositories are there in the hub of BitBucket, and many of them are searchable.

BitBucket

As this site is mainly focused on Ubuntu, so I must not miss this versatile open source project hosting site LaunchPad. Its maintained by Canonical and allows the Ubuntu developer to manage and support the projects that only runon Ubuntu and other Ubuntu-based derivatives.

LaunchPad

Tigris is a bit different open source software management host site like GitHub or SourceForge. It has a define small goal building better tools for collaborative software development. You will not find any unrelated and dead project here. Every software development project is reviewed to test the community commitment towards that specific app development.

Tigris

Github is mainly built for the developers who like to develop the open source project. This is the place where you can download a lot of open source software for Linux, but mainly its made for hosting open source code and project development.

Every page is smooth and but not that user-friendly for downloading and browsing software directly. You will have the direct download link for downloading any software from its vast variety of software repositories inside the project page. If you are a developer, Github is the best place for you to develop the open source project.

Github

FossHub is another website portal to download free open source software. It was started its journey in 2007 and became a reliable place to download open source projects. However, it provides fast servers that take a short moment to load optimized pages for faster download. You will get direct download links for any open source software. No redirection will occur at all. Project page will show you the total downloads of the software which you are going to download. You can write a review for the software if you are not a registered member. Sometimes, FossHub contains some closed source software that makes the user confused sometimes. However, FossHub can be the best place for you to download your favorite open source software.

FossHub

Savannah is a website that will offer you to download a lot of free open source software. It looks like an old-school website which is not very much user-friendly. However, you can try this website to download the software.

Savannah

If you have an open source license,TuxFamily is ready to host your project. At this moment, it has more than 2400 active open source project.

TuxFamily

Freecode is one of the best and most significant open source directory sites for hosting Unix and multi-cross platform software. This open source software website is also founded by the same owner ofSourceForge.

Freecode

Blackduck open hub is a fantastic and useful directory open source hub. Users can get a varietyof information of the open source project like license, language, websites, developer, users ratings, download stats, etc. You can find all the primary developer and open source project here.

BLACKDUCK | Open Hub

Its an open source directory where users can find out a filter system to get the best open source software list. This directory also provides the project site links with necessary information. Its a great and useful tool site to find out the best open source software for home and business use.

Open Source Software Directory

F-Droid is another excellent platform to download free open source software for Android. You will see some best Android software which you will not get in the Google Play Store. You can quickly browse different categories of an app with the F-Droid apk on Android. However, if you use this app for downloading open source software, you will update the apps via the F-Droid client. No additional component is required to download apps. You will have the direct link.

F-Droid

AlternativeTo is an excellent website to download open source software. In recent years it has become trendy to the user although it doesnt host an open source project.

AlternativeTo

OSLiving offers the best keyword tool to find out the open source software you are looking for. The goal of this site is to make an archive of the worlds best open source software. Users can search by keyword or category to get the best one.

Open Source Living OS Living

This is a directory of best open source software which can be run on Windows. Its an Ubuntu site and mainly created for showing the quality of open source applications. In this list of free software, you can find application based on communication, education, engineering, financial, games and much more.

LOOP

Final Thought

I think you have got a clear concept about the website lists that I mentioned above to download free open source software. I hope these lists will be helpful to you. If you like this article, please share with your friends. Thank you very much.

Visit link:
15 Best Websites for Downloading Open Source Software

Encryption: What it is and why its important

Encryption is the process of helping protect personal data by using a secret code to scramble it so that it cannot be read by anyone who doesnt have the code key. Today, vast amounts of personal information are managed online and stored in the cloud or on servers with an ongoing connection to the web. Its nearly impossible to do business of any kind without personal data ending up in a networked computer system, which is why its important to know how to help keep that data private.

Most legitimate websites use what is called Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), which is a form of encrypting data when it is being sent to and from a website. This keeps attackers from accessing that data while it is in transit. Look for the green padlock icon in the URL bar, and the S in the https:// to make sure you are conducting secure, encrypted transactions online.

Its a good idea to access sites utilizing SSL when:

3 reasons why encryption mattersWhy is encryption important? Here are three reasons:

1. Internet privacy concerns are real Encryption helps protect privacy by turning personal information into for your eyes only messages intended only for the parties that need them and no one else. You should make sure that your emails are being sent over an encrypted connection, or that you are encrypting each message. Most email clients come with the option for encryption in the settings menu, and if you check your email with a web browser, take a moment to ensure that SSL encryption is available.

2. Hacking is big businessHackers arent just bored kids in a basement anymore. Theyre big business, and in some cases, theyre multinational outfits. Large-scale data breaches that you may have heard about in the news demonstrate that people are out to steal personal information to fill their pockets.

3. Regulations demand it Healthcare providers are required by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) to implement security features that protect patients sensitive health information. Institutions of higher learning must take similar steps under the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), while retailers must contend with the Fair Credit Practices Act (FCPA) and similar laws. Encryption helps businesses stay compliant as well as helps protect the valuable data of their customers.

See more here:
Encryption: What it is and why its important

Bradley Manning Obituary – Pittsfield, MA | The Berkshire …

Bradley David Manning lost his battle to cancer on Monday, February 25, 2019, leaving this world in a state of comfort thanks to Berkshire Medical Center staff. Brad was born in Pittsfield MA on September 13, 1965 to Robert W. and Barbara A. Manning of Berkshire Village. Brad graduated from Mt. Greylock Regional High School as an accomplished athlete in football and baseball. His love of sports continued into more recreational formats - bowling, golf, and horseshoes. He reigned as a 2x champion for the regional horseshoe tournament in Sandisfield MA. He was a loyal New York Yankees and Pittsburgh Steelers fan for over 40 years.

Following in the footsteps of his father, he was a master carpenter working for various contractors in Berkshire County. He ended his dedicated career working with his brother Scott at Manning Construction, committing a full time schedule up until two months before his death. In his spare time, he created wood art and furniture, and, also held a secret skill for cake decorating!

Brad is survived by his children, Travis and Taylor Manning, both of Adams MA; a granddaughter, Mila; his brother Scott (Crystal) Manning of Pittsfield; two sisters, Kim (Stan) Poplaski of Topsfield, ME and Karen (Michael) Vogel of Pittsfield MA. He also leaves behind his former wife, Maryann Manning, several nieces and nephews, his aunt, Kathleen Face, and uncle, James Manning; his coworker and friend Brandon, and his kindly neighbor George. He was predeceased by his parents, Bob and Barb Manning, and a brother Bobby.

FUNERAL NOTICE-Calling hours for Brad will be held on Sunday, March 3 from 1 - 3 pm at the Wellington Funeral Home, 220 East Street, Pittsfield MA. A private service and celebration for immediate family will be held at a later date. Donations in Brad's memory can be made to Wellington Funeral Home to help off-set funeral expenses for the family. Please visit http://www.wellingtonfuneralhome.com to leave condolences to his family.

See the original post:
Bradley Manning Obituary - Pittsfield, MA | The Berkshire ...