Whats happening in the world of cryptocurrency? – Born2Invest

This week on cryptocurrencies. Tether and Bitfinex filed a collective lawsuit of $1.4 trillion. Russia proposed a way to determine the official course of Bitcoin. Adoption of the bill On digital financial assets has again delayed.

A similar payment system will be a successful solution for the financial center of Europe. Also, its integration into the global financial system. We should not leave this space to China, Russia, the United States or any private supplier.

Earlier, the German government approved a strategy for blockchain. This places the existence of cryptocurrencies. Such as Libra stablecoin from Facebook on the territory of the country. Of course, the ability to issue currency is a key element of state sovereignty. This task cannot simply rest assured to private companies.

A class-action lawsuit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. This all is against Bitfinex, Tether and the parent company iFinex Inc. The amount of investor damage from the companies actions reached $1.4 trillion.

Furthermore, according to the lawyers, Bitfinex and Tether violate the antitrust and commodity exchange laws. Tether controls more than 80% of the U.S. and global steyblock market. The plaintiffs claim that the companies organized a certain scheme. This scheme used to deceive investors, manipulate the cryptorchain and hide illegal income.

The Company reserves the right to disable or freeze the users account. It can deny access to all services at any time and for any reason. Also, Telegram is not responsible for the use of third-party services. Same as loss of personal data and direct, special, incidental or consequential damages of any kind. The use of the wallet is possible only after the age of 18 and only for legitimate purposes.

The development of TON is now in its final stages. They plan to release it by October 31, 2019. In case of failure to meet the deadlines, the company will have to return all their funds to investors in full.

European Commission prepared new unified rules for the regulation of cryptocurrencies. European Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis announced the problems in the field of digital money. These are associated with unfair competition, cybersecurity and threats to financial stability. Europe needs a common approach to regulating cryptocurrencies such as Libra.

I plan to present new legislation in this area, said the Vice President of the European Commission. Earlier, the organization announced the launch of an investigation into Libra by Facebook. The European Commission will check possible restrictions on the entry of alternative products. Due to the launch of the payment solution from the Facebook project.

The new system will make it possible to introduce the taxation of cryptocurrencies and simplify the process of legal proceedings with their participation. Several exchanges request Bitcoin within 30 seconds. After that, this is how experts calculate the cross-rate to the dollar and ruble. Similarly, the cost of digital money.

Currently, Russia can not regulate cryptocurrencies in any way in Russia. Also, it cannot decide on the status of digital money in the country. The Central Bank advocates a complete ban on new types of assets. Earlier, the first deputy chairman of the financial regulator called cryptocurrencies a high-tech financial pyramid.

(Featured image by Icons8 team via Unsplash)

First published in rbc, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.

Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.

Read more:
Whats happening in the world of cryptocurrency? - Born2Invest

Facebook Lays On the Charm for Its Libra Cryptocurrency Plan – The New York Times

Even Republicans, who have been generally more open to the cryptocurrency plan since it was announced in June, have expressed concern about how it has been organized.

Representative Lance Gooden, a Republican from Texas, criticized the decision by the Libra Association, the Facebook-led coalition behind the cryptocurrency, to base itself in Geneva.

There is an impression that perhaps Facebook wants a clean start somewhere else because they havent enjoyed criticism to their social media platform, but Democrats and Republicans agree that criticism of the social network is entirely justified, Mr. Gooden, a member of the Financial Services Committee, said in a phone interview last week.

One evening last week, Mr. Marcus swirled a glass of bourbon in a downtown, nouveau-Southern restaurant in Washington. Despite a flurry of bad news about his project, Mr. Marcus said he was unfazed.

Look, change of this magnitude was going to be hard all along, he said.

When Facebook announced the project, it had only a rough draft of what Libra would look like. The plan was for the final designs to be done by all the partners as part of the Libra Association, in which Facebook would have only one vote. But that lack of detail has made it hard to explain how Libra would deal with problems like money laundering and cybersecurity.

The basic description that Facebook did put forward was enough to bring out the knives from politicians and regulators all over the world. In the United States, President Trump and his Treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, harshly criticized Libra, as did politicians from both parties.

Mr. Marcus, over a dinner of fried green tomato arugula salad and spicy fried chicken, said he had no regrets about how Facebook had introduced the project. He brushed aside criticism that Facebook should have done more to get regulators on board ahead of time.

Original post:
Facebook Lays On the Charm for Its Libra Cryptocurrency Plan - The New York Times

Cryptocurrency: Facebook could do to banks what it did to newspapers – Grand Island Independent

On Wednesday, Mark Zuckerberg, Facebooks chief executive, testified about his companys cryptocurrency project at a hearing held by the House Financial Services Committee. In his testimony, Zuckerberg tried to reassure Congress that Facebooks Libra cryptocurrency would square the circle between financial inclusion and regulatory adherence, consumer privacy and proactive fraud detection. The one thing he didnt manage to address is whether the world really wants a crypto offering from the social media giant.

Cryptocurrency has acquired an unseemly status where any use is automatically assumed to have nefarious ends. It doesnt help that the most prominent example, Bitcoin, has been implicated in some horrific criminal conduct. At the same time, a lack of mainstream adoption gives cryptocurrency few redeeming advocates. No surprise, then, that regulators regard Facebooks proposal with suspicion.

Its not that legitimate businesses dont want crypto; its that their customers dont want to use it for payment. When buying stuff on the internet, consumers will choose the payment method that imposes the lowest transaction cost on themselves thats generally the credit card option, which allows deferred payment as well as the accrual of miles or points. An online business that refuses to accept credit cards will always lose out to a competitor that does.

But what if you dont have any competitors? Facebook enjoys quasi-monopoly status when it comes to consumer attention, controlling the reach and distribution of content across its network of users. (So far, 46 attorneys general have joined a New York-led antitrust investigation of the company and its dominance as a social media platform.)

As the driver of over one-fourth of web traffic, Facebook has a lot of influence over who sees what on the internet. And with over 2.3 billion monthly active users around the world, its not a stretch to imagine that the company could have similar influence over who pays whom, and how.

Mark Zuckerbergs Congressional testimony makes it clear that he takes inspiration from China, where WeChat serves as a one-stop portal to the greater internet. There, users conduct their banking, shopping, and bill payments without ever leaving the app. The ability to control users economic interactions comes with the privilege of deciding the medium of exchange. If it follows suit, Facebook may end up looking like another familiar monopolist our own government, which creates the national currency we use to pay our taxes.

Its no wonder regulators and central banks view the Libra project as a threat to the international monetary system. In a recent report, the G7 Working Group warns that global cryptocurrencies could undermine cross-jurisdictional efforts to combat illicit finance. All international transactions using U.S. dollars currently clear through the New York Federal Reserve, where they can be monitored and stopped if deemed unsavory. Previously, members of the Senate Banking Committee have expressed concern over Facebooks ability to handle economic sanctions on foreign regimes.

Zuckerberg has promised that Calibra, Facebooks payment app, will include robust compliance systems to fulfill regulatory obligations. However, the greater risk is that Calibra will go above and beyond its regulatory duty. Facebook already employs a more restrictive speech code than legally required the platform blocks various forms of hate speech, harassment, misinformation and inauthentic behavior. Publishers must accept Facebooks opaque Terms of Service or risk not being seen at all. Its one thing to deny politically incorrect figures the ability to share inflammatory content; its another thing to leave them economically isolated.

In a competitive market, those who disagree with Facebooks terms could simply take their business elsewhere. The Libra Association currently includes twenty-one member companies, after some early members dropped out. If Facebook mimics WeChat in establishing itself as a go-to payment portal, those former members may have no choice but to return to the cartel.

Global regulators are so worried about preserving their own monopoly status that theyve forgotten that monopolies have victims. Just look at what Facebook did to publishers. When Facebook emerged as the arbiter of eyeballs, publishers lost control of their audiences and ad revenue, and consumers ended up with a barrage of clickbait. If Facebook disintermediates the banking system, it could take control of the economic relationship between businesses and their customers, with greater restrictions on financial transactions than ever before. Its almost enough to make you wish for a decentralized currency.

Elaine Ou is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. She is a blockchain engineer at Global Financial Access in San Francisco. Previously she was a lecturer in the electrical and information engineering department at the University of Sydney.

See original here:
Cryptocurrency: Facebook could do to banks what it did to newspapers - Grand Island Independent

What happened to cryptocurrency: October 2019 highs and lows – CoinGeek

The face of global finance is being altered by the growth of digital currency. Any time theres a change in the status quo, there will be those in favor of the changes and those opposed to them, as well as those who try to buck the system in a misguided belief that they dont have to play by the rules. Ever since money was first invented, there have been individuals willing to break the law to serve their own selfish benefits and the Bitcoin ecosystem is not going to operate any differently. As the activity over the past month shows, there have been ups and downs, but everything is pointing to a better, more fine-tuned industry.

Patrick Byrne, the founder and former CEO of eCommerce giant Overstock, became enamored with cryptocurrency so much that he wanted to shift completely away from retail and focus solely on crypto. However, he may have crossed the line and committed securities fraud in the process. Just like with the many instances of securities fraud associated with fiat, hell be held accountable if found guilty.

Tether and Bitfinex are still battling the State of New York for certain alleged financial improprieties. That case will be continuing for quite some time, and the two are now going to have to respond to another suit. Investors are accusing the pair of creating the largest bubble in history by manipulating crypto market prices and there is a lot of evidence to support the claim.

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which asserts that digital assets are a form of property, has provided some new guidance on what constitutes a tax obligation related to crypto. It has already weighed in on several aspects of crypto transactions, and in its latest input, revealed that any gains from hard forks arent taxed until the gains are realized. If the money is held by an exchange after the hard fork, for example, there arent any gains. Once that money is withdrawn, however, its time to give Uncle Sam his cut.

Alipay, the massive China-based payments company, says no to crypto. It doesnt want to be associated with digital currency in any way and wont even let tertiary services use the payments solution if those transactions will involve crypto or lead to crypto withdrawals or deposits. The decision probably stems from the Alibaba-owned companys desire to have its own form of peer-to-peer fiat payment solution.

A Chinese crypto mining equipment provider and solution, Canaan Creative, is going to do what no rival has been able to do so far. It has asserted that it is going to be listed on a U.S. stock exchange in November, beating out competitors like Bitmain, who hasnt been able to resolve questions about its financial health.

The idea that crypto transactions are completely untraceable is incorrect. It was created by individuals who never properly grasped the concept of Bitcoin and didnt understand how it was going to work. A recent international scandal involving a child porn ring and how over 337 people were raided after their crypto transactions were traced shows the fallacy of the misguided belief.

If you cant beat em, join em. That appears to be the motto of the Canadian government, which is reportedly starting to warm to the idea of launching a digital currency. It would replace fiat and, given the inherent and automatic reporting associated with crypto, would allow the country to constantly track all financial movements by everyone in the country.

Cambodia looks to be considering the idea, as well. It wants easier ways to conduct cross-border payments while reducing associated costs, and the countrys central bank is said to be exploring digital wallets as the answer.

Poloniex is no longer under the Circle umbrella. The crypto exchange announced a week ago that it would break away from the payments company and stand on its own. At the same time, to the dismay of crypto fans in the country, it also announced that it would stop U.S. support as of November 1.

The U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) clarified that crypto companies are required by law to adhere to anti-money-laundering policies. If they dont, they could be charged accordingly, and the announcement is seen as a step forward in showing that crypto can be used as a currency.

China continues to be a leading force behind blockchain innovation. This has been seen by the number of companies that have launched in the country, and there are now a lot more. The Cyberspace Administration of China just approved 309 new blockchain service providers this month, with those entities offering services from eCommerce to tourism and from healthcare to legal matters.

There have now been 452 BTC futures contracts traded on the newly-opened Bakkt futures exchange. There is still a lot to happen and the increase comes as the market weakens, but the prospects of another big bull run are attracting more investors.

Its been a good month for Bitcoin SV (BSV), known better as the original Bitcoin. According to a tweet by expert crypto developer Unwriter, BSV had, as of October 23, eclipsed BTC in organic traffic. He pointed out that it is a very significant point in Bitcoin history. This changes everything. Especially for the BSV builders since it shows that what BSV has expressed all along is true. The blockchain is capable of sustained large blocks, infinite scaling and proven operations. The idea that no blockchain could handle large blocks or massive scaling has just been completely proven false by BSVs performance.

Given how far the Bitcoin ecosystem has come in the past two years, its going to be interesting to look back a year from now and see even more changes. This is just the beginning of a lot of positive growth for crypto and history is being made that will rewrite how the world views money.

To receive the latest CoinGeek.com news, special discounts on CoinGeek Conferences and other inside information direct to your inbox, please sign up for our mailing list.

Read this article:
What happened to cryptocurrency: October 2019 highs and lows - CoinGeek

Cryptocurrency: the importance of assessing the risks – BQ Live

Cryptocurrency has its admirers and its detractors. But there is no denying that it looks to be here to stay.

It is important, therefore, that those in business know how it works, the benefits it can bring and the pitfalls.

There is little doubt that it offers new and exciting business opportunities. The Financial Conduct Authoritys (FCA) definition of cryptocurrency as a publicly available electronic medium of exchange that features a distributed ledger and a decentralised system for exchanging value, may sound like a bit of a mouthful but it is an accurate description. Cryptocurrencies can be accessed via the internet and used for cross-border payments and to fund transfers, all of which can make them useful in business. And being a relatively new concept, cryptocurrency offers investment opportunities.

But while these positives can be welcomed by the business world, it would be foolish and possibly costly to ignore the negatives.

There are plenty of informed observers who believe that cryptocurrency is as much an asset for those looking to commit fraud or launder money as it is for those looking to do legitimate business. Cryptocurrency was allowed to develop with very little regulation although the FCA has now issued its guidance on it - and the anonymity it offers can certainly appeal to those who are looking for a vehicle to commit financial crime. Which is why it needs to be approached with caution.

It would be surprising if anyone with an ounce of business sense committed themselves to a deal or investment opportunity without first making all possible checks into the products involved and the people who are looking to trade. And that approach must also now be taken with cryptocurrency. While to many, cryptocurrency may seem a newly-arrived but relatively unknown quantity, it should be subjected to at least the same level of good, old-fashioned scrutiny that those in business apply to more traditional aspects of their work.

The FCA has emphasised the risks associated with cryptocurrency and the value of managing these risks by having proper procedures in place. But despite any advice that the FCA or other bodies put out regarding cryptocurrency, it remains the responsibility of those in business to make sure they have done all they can to counter the risks.

Cryptocurrency platforms rely on complex infrastructures spread across a variety of countries. Client details will be held by different entities in various countries and jurisdictions. This not only makes it hard for law enforcement agencies and regulators to obtain details they may need it also creates the potential for money laundering and fraud. The result of this, unfortunately, is that it is essentially up to individuals in business and companies to make sure that they and their staff are fully aware of both the risks and the potential warning signs of wrongdoing. The only way to do this properly is by being aware of cryptocurrency developments and carrying out due diligence on any possible trading partners who want to do business involving cryptocurrency.

This may seem a daunting task for those in business who feel they are too busy to find the time and accumulate the expertise to take on such a role. If that is the case they need to seek help and advice from those who have such awareness. What they cannot do is go into any cryptocurrency-related activity not knowing the possible implications. It would be improper to suggest that all aspects of cryptocurrency are a breeding ground for criminality and that everyone who promotes or uses it has illegal gains on their mind. But it certainly offers scope for wrongdoing.

It is important, therefore, that those looking to become involved with it leave nothing to chance. To leap into the world of cryptocurrency without a full knowledge of it or without the necessary precautions in place is to invite problems. Most people in business do their homework and exercise caution in all aspects of their work. They would never think of taking up an opportunity without taking the time to make sure it is as genuine as they have been told. Cryptocurrency is the new kid on the business block. But it still has to be treated with the caution that is exercised in more established aspects of business activity.

Aziz Rahman is founder of Rahman Ravelli; a top-ranked business crime law firm in national and international legal guides.

More here:
Cryptocurrency: the importance of assessing the risks - BQ Live

Creative Destruction Lab partners with Facebook on new cryptocurrency – Varsity

In June, the Rotman School of Managements seed-stage incubator announced a partnership with Facebooks new venture into cryptocurrency: Libra. As the companys only academic founding partner, U of Ts Creative Destruction Lab (CDL) will participate as part of the Libra Association in its efforts to create a cryptocurrency infrastructure.

While CDL touts the partnership as an exciting opportunity for innovation, recent criticisms leveraged against the tech giant have some wondering if Libra is contributing to Facebooks woes.

Facebooks crypto experiment

On June 18, amid a tense period for the company, Facebook released a statement announcing Calibra, a new subsidiary of Facebook that aims to connect people to financial services through the Libra network.

Calibra intends to create a digital wallet system where people can buy, spend, and save Libra cryptocurrency. Users will be able to use Libras wallet on Facebook-owned services like WhatsApp, Messenger, and as a standalone app.

The Libra network will use a blockchain system that will record every transaction that takes place. As a permissioned network, Libras blockchain can only function on specific servers.

Libras network will be overseen by the Libra Association, which is composed of companies, non-profit organizations, and academic institutions. The association intends to manage the network, provide servers to run the network, and manage the cryptocurrencys reserve. The association also removes Libras control from the hands of Facebook into those of industry, academia, and non-profit sectors.

When it was announced, the Libra Association had 27 members, including Spotify, Lyft, and Uber. Facebook hopes to have at least 100 partners in the association by Libras expected 2020 launch.

CDL joins The Libra Association

While the CDL was established at the University of Toronto in 2012, the lab now operates with locations across the country and in the United Kingdom. As a seed-stage program, CDL supports startups in the science and technology field.

CDLs partnership with Libra is intended to build on the labs incubation role by providing additional opportunities for the startup community. According to Rotman School of Management Professor and CDLs Chief Economist, Joshua Gans, the partnership intends to provide more opportunities for CDL startups in the blockchain stream. In the long-term, Gans said Libra presents an opportunity for the entire startup community. In creating better startup ecosystems, we will be fulfilling our mission, he said.

In an email to The Varsity, Gans discussed how the partnership will benefit the U of T community, saying, for the university, it represents a bold and innovative move with a set of challenges that is not normally in the universitys wheelhouse but is something that its leadership can build on and signal a vision that goes beyond the ordinary day-to-day of academic life.

I think it is particularly gratifying that the university, at its highest levels, has been able to back our role in Libra thus far and I hope that will continue as things evolve, Gans added.

In an interview with The Varsity, Associate Professor of Finance at the Rotman School of Management and at UTMs Department of Management, Andreas Park, said academic institutions should have a role to play in regulating Libra.

I think its really important that an academic institution is part of [the governance process], Park said, adding that academic partners could have a positive influence when outlining Libras objectives, goals, and governance structure.

Libras promise and pitfalls

When announcing the project, Facebook evoked current concerns around financial systems as justification for the product. Specifically, the company noted that financial infrastructures are inaccessible in developing countries especially for women.

Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg reflected on this promise in leaked memos, saying he hopes that Libra will create a system of digital money that can work globally and can effectively be implemented by big companies.

For Park, a global cryptocurrency system has significant potential, especially for countries without a stable currency. An effective cryptocurrency system could have a sweeping positive impact by creating a financial structure that transcends borders.

Most people in the world would benefit greatly if they had stable money, Park said. And if you think of Facebook as two billion users, most of them are not from the developed world. So, the developing world can benefit enormously [by] this initiative almost by accident.

I could not envision a world in which the public sector would actually be able to build this, Park added.

However, while Facebook maintains that Libra will protect users private information apart from sharing data to keep people safe and comply with the law some researchers, lawmakers, and advocates have raised concerns with Facebooks track record on privacy.

Amid these mounting concerns, Libra has come under sharp scrutiny. For some companies, the costs of participating in Libra outweighed the benefits. Earlier this month, reports surfaced that seven major partners had left the association: Paypal, Visa, Mastercard, eBay, Stripe, Mercado Pago, and Booking.

Megan Boler, Associate Chair of the Department of Social Justice Education in the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, raised concerns about Facebooks size and power in an email to The Varsity. Nothing could be more disturbingly symbolic of Facebooks meteoric rise to ruling the globe than Libra, Boler said in an email to The Varsity. Given Facebooks track record with profit over public good, one must cultivate deep suspicion about this corporations ongoing amalgamation of economic, political, legal and increasingly moral power.

Park also discussed possible concerns with Facebooks ownership of a global financial system. Unlike banks, which have limited personal data about customers, Facebook has a plethora of information on every user.

If you have the complete picture, youre extremely powerful, Park explained.

Disclaimer: Kaitlyn Simpson previously served as Volume 138 Features Editor and Volume 139 Managing Online Editor of The Varsity, and currently serves on the Board of Directors of Varsity Publications Inc.

Tags: currency, Facebook, Libra, money, Social Media, Technology

Read more:
Creative Destruction Lab partners with Facebook on new cryptocurrency - Varsity

WikiLeaks Coverage: Another Good Reason to Support Consortium News – Consortium News

Consortium Newshas provided leading WikiLeaks coverage from as early as 2010, under its founder Robert Parry. Its another good reason to support Consortium News.

Joe LauriaEditor-in-Chief

On Dec. 16, 2010Robert Parry wrote an article on Consortium News about Julian Assange that is as relevant today as it was nine years ago. Parry wrote about the Obama administrations attempt to indict Assange for simply doing what all investigative journalists do: namely encourage their sources to turn over secret information even if they have to break the law to do so. While the Obama DOJ eventually decided against indictment because it would cross the red line of criminalizing journalism, the Trump administration crossed that very line on the very same evidence the Obama administration rejected. It was an especially prescient and relevant article from the late founder of Consortium News,written just eight months after thereleaseof the Collateral Murder video.

Bob wrote:

Whatever the unusual aspects of the case, the Obama administrations reported plan to indict WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for conspiring with Army Pvt. Bradley Manning to obtain U.S. secrets strikes at the heart of investigative journalism on national security scandals.

Thats because the process for reporters obtaining classified information about crimes of state most often involves a journalist persuading some government official to break the law either by turning over classified documents or at least by talking about the secret information. There is almost always some level of conspiracy between reporter and source.

Robert Parry

Julian Assange

If you read the two indictments against Assange, for which the Trump administration wants the imprisoned publisher extradited from Britain to Virginia, they describe this very process of investigative journalism that Bob, one of Americas greatest investigative reporters, described in his piece. Assange is accused of helping Manning hide her identity, not to hack classified material that the indictment says Manning already had legal access to. And Assange is accused of goading Manning to give over more material, as if that is a crime. The indictments describe journalism, not hacking.

Essentially what Bob was saying is: all investigative journalists are Julian Assange. And thats why corporate media sell-outs, who defend the powerful and not the public, dont consider Assange a journalist, though has done exactly their job, only better. The satirical publication The Onion put these made-up words into the mouth of Washington Post Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt, a frequent target of Bobs ire:

Its abundantly clear that Mr. Assange was focused on exposing documented evidence of U.S. war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan without so much as a thought for the journalists who faithfully parroted the U.S. militarys talking points when we could have been investigating information that ran contrary to that narrativedoes he realize how that makes us look?

In the years since that article by Bob, Consortium News coverage of WikiLeaks and Assange has grown into the most extensive to be found in either established or alternative media. Last year the site began hosting a weekly online video vigil for Assange while he was still in the Ecuador embassy, which developed into CN Live!Around the time of his arrest on April 11, 2019 we provided wall-to-wall coverage for several days and continue to remain on top of the story. Last weeks CN Live! was completely devoted to Assange.

In the face of corporate media malpractice on this story, we remain committed to fighting to get the facts out about Assangea journalistic test case for the ages on which the future of journalism literally hinges. But we cant do it without you. So please give a tax-deductible contribution to our Fall Fund Drive so that youll still be able to turn to Consortium News for the latest news, analysis and commentary on the plight of Julian Assange and a free press.

Please honor Bob Parrys legacy and help us cover Julian Assange bydonating generously to our Fall Fund Drive. Weve almost hit our target!

Continued here:
WikiLeaks Coverage: Another Good Reason to Support Consortium News - Consortium News

OPCW Whistleblower Panel on the Douma attack of April 2018 – WIKILEAKS

Today WikiLeaks publishes a statement made by a panel that listened to testimony and reviewed evidence from a whistleblower from the OPCW (Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) last week. To accompany this statement, Wikileaks is also publishing a previously leaked engineering assessment of the alleged chemical attack in Douma, Syria on April 7th last year. This assessment was omitted in the final report by the OPCW, which does not support its findings.

WikiLeaks editor Kristinn Hrafnsson took part in the panel to review the testimony and documents from the OPCW whistleblower. He says: The panel was presented with evidence that casts doubt on the integrity of the OPCW. Although the whistleblower was not ready to step forward and/or present documents to the public, WikiLeaks believes it is now of utmost interest for the public to see everything that was collected by the Fact Finding Mission on Douma and all scientific reports written in relation to the investigation.

We call out to people within the OPCW to leak these documents securely to us via wikileaks.org/#submit One of the panel members was Dr Jos Bustani, the first Director-General of the OPCW, who concluded that: The convincing evidence of irregular behaviour in the OPCW investigation of the alleged Douma chemical attack confirms doubts and suspicions I already had. I could make no sense of what I was reading in the international press. Even official reports of investigations seemed incoherent at best. The picture is certainly clearer now, although very disturbing

In support of the OPCWs original objectives, the panel called upon the organisation to re-establish its credibility and legitimacy by allowing all inspectors who took part in the Douma investigation to come forward and report their differing observations in an appropriate forum of the States Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention

Read more from the original source:
OPCW Whistleblower Panel on the Douma attack of April 2018 - WIKILEAKS

Mary Anne Marsh: The walls are closing in on President Trump – Fox News

If we were confident the president did not commit a crime we would have said so, Special Counsel Robert Mueller said at a May press conference after releasing his eponymous report. Now, we may find out what Muellerwas talking about.

On Friday, as Trump and Republicans continued to attack the impeachment inquiry by House Democrats,Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., issued a decision that may have sealed Trump's fate. Howell ruled that the Department of Justice must provide Congress with the unredacted version of the Mueller report as well as the grand jury testimony and related materials. The unredacted information disclosed in the report could answer what did Trump know and when did he know it.

Specifically, Howells ruling sets into motion a series of events that could reveal Trump knew in advance about the emails stolen by Russia and released by WikiLeaksin 2016 to harm Hillary Clinton. The events are the release of the unredacted Mueller report to Congress by October30, the Roger Stone-WikiLeaks trial scheduled to begin on November5, and the public impeachment inquiry hearings by the House that will start a week or so later. Collectively, these three events could show a pattern by Trump of seeking foreign assistance for his campaigns in 2016 and 2020, which is illegal and bolstersthe impeachment inquiry.

REP. JIM BANKS: ADAM SCHIFF LIES ABOUT TRUMP REPEATEDLY SHOULDN'T BE LEADING IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY

Remember, Congress never received the unredacted Mueller report with the grand jury testimony and related materials they are entitled to because Attorney General William Barr wrongly withheld it since Mueller submitted his report to Barr last April. Now Congress is about to get it and that could be the undoing of Trump.

First, Howells decision not only requires that the redactions, grand jury testimonyand underlying evidence in the Mueller report be released to the House Judiciary Committee by Oct. 30, but it also established that the impeachment inquiry is legitimate. Tipping the scale even further toward disclosure is the publics interest in a diligent and thorough investigation into, and in a final determination about, potentially impeachable conduct by the president described in the Mueller report, Howell said.

The Mueller report contains many redacted passages of interest, including possible references to a call between Trump and Stone about the release of emails by WikiLeaks that could confirm Michael Cohens testimony about it. Cohen alleged to the House Oversight Committee last March that Trump received a phone call from Stone between July 17 and 20, 2016,informing him that WikiLeaks was planning to release emails that would damage Hillary Clinton. By the end of that week, WikiLeaks posted thousands of emails stolen by Russia in an attempt to disrupt the Democratic National Convention and harm Clinton.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

In addition, the alleged call between Trump and Stone is likely to be addressed in the Stone-WikiLeaks trial scheduled to start in Washington on Nov. 5.Stone faces a seven-count indictment that includes one count of obstruction of an official proceeding, five counts of false statements, and one count of witness tampering.The combination of the unredacted Mueller report and the Stone trialcould confirm whether Trump knew about the release of the emails from Stone in advance.

Finally, the House plansto begin public hearings into the impeachment inquiry about a week after the start of the Stone-WikiLeaks trial. The inquiry is focused on the call by Trump to Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky and the relationship between the release of military aid and thepressure to investigate Joe Biden. If the unredacted Mueller report and Stone trial reveal that Trump knew in advance that the stolen emails were going to be released, then it establishes a pattern by Trump of seeking foreign assistance to help his campaigns. That is illegal and thereby bolstersthe investigation into his call to Zelensky.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Such disclosures would further increase public support for Trumps impeachment and removal from office. The combination of the facts, evidence, and public support would force many, if not most, Republicans to support Trumps impeachment as well.

The stretch between Halloween and Thanksgiving could bring the greatest threat to Trump to date with much to fear and little to be thankful for. It may well be the beginning of his impeachment and the end of his time in office.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY MARY ANNE MARSH

Read more here:
Mary Anne Marsh: The walls are closing in on President Trump - Fox News

Snowden memoir: The spy who came out and told – Associated Press

This cover image released by Metropolitan Books shows "Permanent Record," a memoir by Edward Snowden. The former CIA and National Security Agency systems engineer is now a digital privacy activist living in exile in Russia, charged with Espionage Act violations for which he says his conscience offered no other option. (Metropolitan Books via AP)

This cover image released by Metropolitan Books shows "Permanent Record," a memoir by Edward Snowden. The former CIA and National Security Agency systems engineer is now a digital privacy activist living in exile in Russia, charged with Espionage Act violations for which he says his conscience offered no other option. (Metropolitan Books via AP)

Permanent Record, Metropolitan Books, by Edward Snowden

Edward Snowden is mostly self-invented, the fruit of his own ingenuity. If hacking, purely defined, consists of devising the simplest, most elegant way of getting what you want, then Snowden excelled at it, beginning when he set back every clock in the house at age 6 so he could stay up past bedtime.

Snowden would later hack his way through adolescence. He calculated the minimum amount of work needed for passing grades in high school. The scheme worked until Honest Ed explained it to a teacher.

Such stories enliven the new memoir, Permanent Record, from the computer whiz who exposed secret U.S. government mass domestic surveillance six years ago.

The former CIA and National Security Agency systems engineer is now a digital privacy activist living in exile in Russia, charged with Espionage Act violations for which he says his conscience offered no other option.

Born in 1983, Snowden grew up on the early internet, intoxicated by its seemingly limitless potential for good. Before innocence was lost, it represented for him Americas true values. Patriotism was ingrained in Snowdens upbringing. His parents quietly exercised it clocking in daily at work. Dad was a Coast Guard techie. Mom held various government jobs.

Coming-of-age memoirs like Snowdens typically recount journeys of moral discovery. That is the books strength. Others, most notably journalist Glenn Greenwald and filmmaker Laura Poitras, have already better chronicled the white-knuckled drama of how the most famous whistleblower since Daniel Ellsberg persuaded them to meet him in Hong Kong in 2013 so he could lift the lid on the NSAs mass surveillance of U.S. citizens.

What Snowden does well is define the promise and dangers of digital technology and the wacky alchemy that grants system architects and administrators like him extraordinary power over peoples lives. His clear-cut explanations of complicated yet vital phenomena like the TOR privacy browser and encryption are especially instructive.

Snowden most regrets his atavistic reaction to 9/11, how the 18-year-old Ed became a willing vehicle of vengeance. He enlists in the Army only to break his leg in basic training. Then he watches from the inside as U.S. agents kidnap and torture foreigners.

Engrossing is Snowdens description of how he used his programming skills to create a repository of classified in-house jots on the NSAs global snooping and built a backup system for agency data. Reading through the repository, Snowden begins to understand the extent of his governments stomping on civil liberties. He becomes sullen, cursed with the knowledge that all of us had been reduced to something like children, whod been forced to live the rest of their lives under omniscient parental supervision.

As he was deciding to blow the whistle, Snowden also came to realize that it wasnt just the government that was amassing and categorizing our data. The eureka moment came when he met his first internet-equipped smart fridge.

Here he was, getting all exercised about U.S. government snooping while surveillance capitalists were collecting incredible dossiers on acquiescent consumers.

View post:
Snowden memoir: The spy who came out and told - Associated Press