IBM: Central bank cryptocurrency could be available within five years – Westfair Online

Central banks around the world are considering the creation of their own cryptocurrency and could have it ready for consumer use within five years, according to a new report commissioned by Armonk-based IBM.

The report, titled Retail CBDCs, The Next Payments Frontier, was created in collaboration with the central banking think tank OMFIF and surveyed officials from 23 central banks in advanced and emerging economies.

The policymakers at the central banks worried that unregulated private-sector digital currencies could possibly undermine their monetary sovereignty and create risks to financial stability. Seventy-three percent of the surveys respondents said the creation of a new central bank digital currency (CBDC) as an alternative to existing cryptocurrencies could be available for consumers on all types of payments where cash is currently used.

However, 82% of the surveys respondents said their greatest financial stability concern from CBDC implementation was the risk of digital bank runs that could wreck consumer confidence in this new currency source. And the central bank officials admitted they would need to work with the private sector on implementation and maintenance, with 64% of respondents predicting outsourceable intermediation functions, such as customer onboarding, would be important in this type of endeavor.

Central banks surveyed are interested in positioning themselves to launch their own retail CBDCs, as the findings of this report make clear, said Saket Sinha, global vice president, IBM Blockchain Financial Services. Large banks and technology companies will have a major role to play as new public private partnerships are formed to promote interoperability, create services, and extend financial inclusion.

No central bank currently recognizes or regulates cryptocurrencies. In July, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell told a congressional hearing that he was apprehensive over the potential introduction of Libra, a cryptocurrency proposed by the social media giant Facebook.

Libra raises many serious concerns regarding privacy, money laundering, consumer protection and financial stability, Powell said, adding that while Libra does have potentially systemic scale, it needs a careful look. So, I strongly believe we all need to be taking our time with this.

Here is the original post:
IBM: Central bank cryptocurrency could be available within five years - Westfair Online

The cryptocurrency market is vulnerable to further losses – FXStreet

The cryptocurrency market has resumed the sell-off after a short period of range-bound trading that took. At the time of writing, Bitcoin stays down 2% since this time on Tuesday, while the majority of altcoins out of top-20 have are a mixed picture ranging from -4% to +2.5%. The total cryptocurrency market capitalization is registered at $248, unchanged from the day before; an average daily trading volume settled at $98 billion from $97 this time on Tuesday; Bitcoin's market share decreased to 67.2%.

Read also:Bitcoin price analysis: BTC/USD extends the decline, $9,000 within reach

BTC/USD bottomed at $9,139 during early Asian hours and recovered to $9,170 by the time of writing. A confluence of SMA100 (Simple Moving Average) and the upper line of the Bollinger Band on a daily chart located above psychological $9,600, limits BTC/USD recovery. The critical support is created by SMA200 at $9,000.Ethereum, the second-largest digital asset with the current market capitalization of $20.2 billion, has stayed unchanged a day-to-day basis and lost approximately 3.5% since the beginning of Wednesday. At the time of writing, ETH/USD is changing hands at $184.60, off the recent high of $192.23 touched during early Asian hours. Looking technically, ETH/USD recovery is capped by SMA100 daily, though the longer-term forecast remains bullish as long as it stays above $180.00.Ripples XRP ha settled marginally $0.3000 after a strong recovery on Tuesday. The third digital coin with the current market value of $13.1 has gained over 2% of its value on a day-to-day basis and stayed unchanged since the beginning of the day.

See the rest here:
The cryptocurrency market is vulnerable to further losses - FXStreet

Long Island cryptocurrency firm agrees to merger – Newsday

Long Blockchain Corp., a Long Island company that made headlines by joining the cryptocurrency craze in 2017, has reached a tentative deal to be absorbed into a Massachusetts promotional products distributor.

Financial terms of the nonbinding deal announced Monday were not disclosed.

Andy Shape, chief executive of Long Blockchain and president of the distributor, Quincy-based Stran & Company Inc., said the companies hope to close the deal by year's end.

In December 2017, Farmingdale-based Long Island Iced Tea Corp. announced it was changing its name to Long Blockchain and would focus on the technology behind the digital currency bitcoin.

The companys stock soared as high as $9.49 after the announcement, but the pricehas plummeted along with the price of bitcoin, the most prominent cryptocurrency, which peaked at around $20,000.

On Tuesday afternoon, Long Blockchain shares were trading at 19 cents, up 7.2 percent, while bitcoin was trading at about $9,370.

Shape said privately held Stran would enter the public markets through the merger with Long Blockchain, which trades over the counter.

"We're trying to get a definitive agreement signed within the next few weeks," said Shape.

The latest LI business news in your inbox Monday through Friday.

By clicking Sign up, you agree to our privacy policy.

He said the deal requires approval of Long Blockchain's board of directors, but does not need a shareholder vote. Long Blockchain's largest shareholder is U.K. investment firm Court Cavendish Ltd., with about 45.3 percent of shares outstanding, according to Bloomberg's compilation of government filings.

Stran, which operates under the name Stran Promotional Solutions, has more than 50 full-time employees and provides corporate clients with custom displays and promotional products.

For instance, Stran, founded 25 years ago, is providing ponchos for Sunday's TCS New York City Marathon bearing the imprint of the event sponsor, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., Shape said.

In September, Long Blockchain announced a "definitive agreement" to sell the Long Island Brand Beverage LLC unit to Vancouver, Canada, investment firm ECC Ventures 2 Corp. for stock and $500,000 Canadian.

After the company adopted the Long Blockchain name, its iced tea business became a subsidiary.

In its most recent financial report, for the quarter ended Sept.30, 2018, Long Blockchainposted a net loss of $742,642 on revenue of $827,146.

Scott Ackerman, CEO of ECC Ventures 2 and president and CEO of Vancouver-based Emprise Capital Corp., is expected to join the board of the iced tea company once the deal closes.

In a telephone call Tuesday, Ackerman said he was unable to discuss future plans for the Long Island Iced Tea business until the deal closes.

Bitcoin and other types of cryptocurrencies are digital currencies that are not controlled by a centralized bank or government and allow users to spend money anonymously.

Facebook has been seeking partners to join in the launch of its own cryptocurrency, Libra. Unlike bitcoin, Libra would be backed by a basket of currencies and debt securities.

In March 2018, HBOs Last Week Tonight With John Oliver. lampooned Long Blockchain in a segment about companies that added "blockchain" to their name in an effort to get a boost in their stock prices.

Ken Schachter covers corporate news, including technology and aerospace, and other business topics for Newsday. He has also worked at The Miami Herald and The Jerusalem Post.

The rest is here:
Long Island cryptocurrency firm agrees to merger - Newsday

Congressman Tom Emmer Announces Bill To Protect Crypto From The SEC – Crypto Briefing

Following last weeks Congressional hearing with Mark Zuckerberg over Facebooks Libra intentions, one lawmaker, Tom Emmer, has outlined his intention to introduce a new U.S. crypto bill that could provide token sales legal protection from SEC enforcement actions.

The Republican Congressman for Minnesota said U.S. authorities should only apply securities regulations to cryptocurrencies that meet the traditional criteria of securities.

Although most blockchain companies, particularly in the U.S., try their best to follow the rules, authorities are adept at moving the goalposts, he said. That created uncertainty that made it difficult for the blockchain sector to operate legitimately in the country.

Companies that have followed our current rules of the road, even if convoluted, deserve the certainty that they can offer their digital asset to the public and help contribute to a truly decentralized network,he said during the testimony.

Emmer said he planned to table a U.S. crypto bill that would protect token sales, on the condition that they demonstrated full compliance with existing securities legislation. That could allow blockchain companies to conduct legitimate cryptocurrency token sales, without the fear of regulatory backlash.

The SEC has issued multiple refund orders since the end of the ICO boom. More recently, it reached a settlement with Block.one over the protocols $4 billion ICO and filed a lawsuit against Telegram for its billion-dollar private sale earlier this month.

Earlier this week, fellow Republican Congressman Sylvia Garcia introduced legislation that would classify stablecoins, including Tether (USDT) and Paxos (PAX), as securities. The bill appears to be in response to Libra, which is also referred to as a stablecoin.

Although representative Tom Emmer expressed concern about Libra domiciling itself in Switzerland the grandfather of all tax havens as one Congressman put it he criticized fellow Committee members who he believed were calling for an outright ban without any understanding about the underlying technology.

I can safely say that this is at least the second time youve testified before Congress, he told Zuckerberg, where members look like they have invested absolutely no time learning about new technologies in order to responsibly question tech companies.

Patrick McLain co-founder of San Francisco-based blockchain accelerator MouseBelt also highlighted that Congress approach to cryptocurrency was far from positive, arguing that lawmakers have drawn a line in the sand that says, Cryptocurrency is unwelcome in the United States, and we will do everything in our power to stop it including villainize some of the worlds best innovators.'

This is the government putting the very concept of cryptocurrency on trial, he added.

Tom Emmer has previously served as the co-chair of the Congressional Blockchain Caucus and sponsored blockchain-friendly legislation in the past. Should his crypto bill receive support across the House, it might represent a significant turning-point: cryptocurrency might finally have drawn clear of its biggest opponent.

Read the rest here:
Congressman Tom Emmer Announces Bill To Protect Crypto From The SEC - Crypto Briefing

New School Mining: What’s Next for Cryptocurrency and Blockchain – Innovation & Tech Today

During this decade, cryptocurrency and blockchain technology have roared into being, creating two giant market surges and falls and enduring tough growing pains. After the wild ICO-led rise and retreat of cryptocurrency in 2017, which drew huge numbers of miners into the market and led to headline-grabbing spikes with Bitcoin, among others, were in one of those growing pains phases which could be a good thing.

It is a very good thing, according to crypto expert Ben Payne, owner of New School Mining, who views it as an opportunity to upgrade and implement new technology while focusing heavily on the areas of greatest concern to crypto miners and blockchain users transaction speed, privacy, and customer service.

From a miners standpoint, weve seen a lot of people getting out of it, Payne said. The margins arent there like they have been. From a customer service standpoint, though, Im saying, Hey, theres stuff going on. Prices may be down, press excitement may be down, but the engineers behind the scenes arent slowing down, not the ones with the financial capability to continue.

What is going to bring crypto to its next high point is people seeing other applications for the technology. If I were to sum up 2017 and 2018, the market craziness was all because of ICOs. About $8 billion was invested in ICOs, which drove a lot of money in. Then it got press and hype, people came in to buy and hold coins, which drove the market price up.

Payne, a successful software engineer, and his wife and business partner Ava Payne started New School Mining in 2017 to focus on two underserved areas co-located mining and direct customer service. Theyve since staffed up with a team of experts in all operational facets. Like thousands of other miners, Payne grew weary of the shoddy response time to his inquiries to coin exchanges, as well as limitations on the technology and process to mine most efficiently. He saw a need for more efficient hardware and power usage in data centers, and to create affordable mining solutions. Customers can either use NSM hardware (cloud mining) or their own hardware located on site (co-location mining), or have the NSM team take care of the mining for them; they also consult on blockchain, cloud, and co-located mining. Today, NSMs 8,000-square-foot center has more than 1,000 GPUs and is growing steadily. They mine Ethereum, Ravencoin, BitTube, and other coins.

A number of people Ive met are reaching limits with their setup, Payne explained. Theyre trying to scale up their operations and need a place to go. Thats where co-location comes into play. They might have spent a couple hundred thousand dollars on mining equipment, then underestimated how much investment it takes to keep those things running. Its easily an additional $100,000 to $200,000 investment to keep $200,000 of equipment running. However, that number goes down with scale, so the advantage in going with co-located, customer-owned hardware is they can take advantage of that scale. Co-location is an ideal solution.

Its going to serve us well during this time of retrenchment, innovation, and growth. Payne and several other experts in the field see 2019 as a year of technology upgrading, market steadying, and larger crypto coins co-opting and integrating superior technologies developed by smaller exchanges (which they can do, as most of the coding is open source).

If I had to sum up where things are going this year, were going to see a lot of technology innovation. A lot of mixing the pot, Payne said. If you think of all these ideas and the couple thousand cryptocurrencies that exist, theyve all done their own little things. Now youre going to start seeing the people with established userbases entice more users. Theyre going to look at technologies that others have developed, the small coins, and integrate them. How? Well, they have to embrace and bring out something innovative. Were going to see the top 20 coins start to do some innovative things.

One of which is already happening, bringing us to the major topic of transaction speed. Right now, coin exchange speeds are a tiny fraction of what you see in a typical financial institution like a bank, credit card, or stock market operation. On that subject, Payne pointed to Mimblewimble, a curiously named technology, first white-papered in 2016, that increases scaling and transaction speeds and enhances privacy on personal information in wallets a killer dual purpose badly needed in blockchain.

Its named and themed after a spell from Harry Potter, Payne said with a chuckle. The guy who put out the white paper goes by a pseudonym, Judesor; the last name is French for Voldemort. Its an alternative to the general blockchain protocol that almost all cryptocurrencies use, and it addresses the scaling issue. Bitcoin can generally handle five to ten transactions per second, whereas Visa or Mastercard can handle 30,000 to 40,000 transactions per second. The fastest blockchains can do maybe 200 transactions per second.

Mimblewimbles [transaction] numbers will be significantly higher than the fastest blockchain, because it aggregates lots of transactions into bigger blocs. It allows individual wallets to direct-transact, but also protects your data and addresses the privacy issue. It nails the two biggest complaints about blockchain transaction rates and privacy. When Litecoin announced they were going to start using this technology, the next day, they were up 30 percent, and brought all the currencies up 10 percent. A new coin has even been created around Mimblewimble, called Grin.

A lot of people are intrigued by this technology, Payne went on. There has been a priority in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space to tighten up privacy and speed up transactions and get much improved customer service. When it comes to the currencies that have the most volume Bitcoin, Ethereum the issues need to be addressed in a major way.

Another core area in which Payne is driving industry improvement is customer service. As a software engineer and consultant, his relationship with customer service is basically do-or-die: if you dont provide great customer service, you lose business. The crypto world has been notorious for shoddy, sometimes non-existent, customer service. Reversing that, in an industry-leading way, has been central to NSMs mission since day one.

The problem goes back to customer service, Payne said. Many websites are incomplete, they dont have good messaging, company principals are unknown or unavailable to customers, and the business model doesnt give you access to your hardware at all. Miners need to be comfortable in knowing companies like New School Mining are serving their best interests, and staying in touch. I need to be comfortable with the idea of sending $2,000 or $200,000 to the company for co-location, have the confidence Im getting my hardware back if and when I ask for it, and that the company is reputable and looks out for my best interests as well as their own. Thats rare. It should be automatic; its customer service at a very basic, common-sense level.

NSMs emphasis on creating an informative website with videos, newsletters, industry articles, Paynes expert tips on coins and mining, and other customer-centric content sounds like basic business communication, but in the crypto space, its innovative and customers are noticing. They also note the rapid speed of getting responses from executives that work with them individually to enhance their mining potential, rather than simply taking an online profile and investment in coins, and giving back little to no information.

The Paynes see the type of information shared between company and customer as the next step forward and its a big step, as Ben Payne explains, one that speaks to a future where we can track every bit of every transaction, and so can the host datacenter.

Our vision is to have a fully automated end-to-end system, making sure the miners are running, monitoring them and keeping them running, whether providing hash power to a pool or solo mining, Payne said. Also, tracking payments, making sure were generating payments daily, hourly, from these mining pools to a wallet. We want to track these and measure directly what our actual yield from the mining is. Thats a difficult thing for most miners to do, actual yield, especially when youre mining multiple currencies and changing currencies on a regular basis.

Ava Payne feels that personal, high-quality attention is one of the biggest survival skills crypto exchanges and blockchain providers can adopt and excel at in the coming years.

Communication is a key point. Experienced people like Ben understand this technology, the exchanges, and customer service needs, and know how to communicate that. However, so many people have just jumped on this bandwagon as a novelty, the hottest new thing. Maybe theyre not as tech savvy. Communicating with them, keeping them in the loop, keeping them updated on their hardware and whats happening in the larger industry, is very key. Companies that get it right are companies where the customers are made to feel special. Whether youre one of 100 customers or one of a million, doesnt matter everyone should feel special.

What will happen next to the cryptocurrency exchange market? What will move it from its hovering position into the next growth phase? Whatever it is, Ben Payne predicts well see more of the organic growth we saw from 2014, when Bitcoins first big spike sent thousands into the market, until the second spike in 2017.

It will be interesting to see what moves the market, he said. If its a technology play, and its the wave of the future with this or that coin, I dont know that it will necessarily drive in as much money so quickly. If it catches on as something useful, and you put $100 in, and another person puts $100 in, and it slowly and organically grows, then well see a steady increase in value, not this spike we saw in 2017.

Read this article:
New School Mining: What's Next for Cryptocurrency and Blockchain - Innovation & Tech Today

AT&T isnt scared of latest cryptocurrency SIM-swap allegations, will fight in court – The Next Web

AT&T will dispute allegations that it was negligent after allegedly contributing to the loss of $1.7 million worth of digital assets owned by a customer in the latest SIM swap case.

A spokesman for the company, Jim Greer, told CoinDesk: Its unfortunate that Mr. Shapiro [the customer] experienced this, but we will dispute his allegations. We look forward to presenting our case in court.

The news comes after Seth Shapiro, head of strategy at VideoCoin, adecentralized video encoding, storage, and content distribution system, said the phone company had failed to secure his device when it was hacked in May last year.

According to Shapiro, hackers allegedly gained control of his mobile phone, reset his email, and then breached several accounts on cryptocurrency exchanges, stealing $1 million in the process.

Recent high profile cases reinforce the importance of businesses and consumers taking steps to protect against SIM swap fraud, such as not using mobile phone numbers as the single source of security and authentication, Greer added.

Its not the first time the phone giant madeheadlines in recent weeks. Back in August, it was revealed that AT&T employees unlocked millions of mobile phones to plant malwareand removed the phones from the providers network in exchange for thousands of dollars in bribes.

The details were revealed afterthe US Department of Justice (DoJ) opened a case against Muhammad Fahd, who had been accused of operating a fraudulent operation todisable AT&Ts proprietary software that safeguards phones from being unlocked.

Prior to that, in July, a US federal judge disregarded AT&Ts request to dismiss aa$224 million lawsuitover yet another SIM-swapping incident that led to $24 million in stolen cryptocurrency.

Apress releasepublished at the timesaid the telecom giant would face court over allegationsthat it violated the Federal Communications Act, as well as several other laws, whenhackers used the identity (and telephone account) of cryptocurrency investor Michael Terpin in 2017.

AT&T began accepting cryptocurrency as an online payment option at the end of May, claiming to be the first major US mobile carrier to do so.

Published October 29, 2019 09:34 UTC

See more here:
AT&T isnt scared of latest cryptocurrency SIM-swap allegations, will fight in court - The Next Web

The cryptocurrency market tries to get back on recovery track – FXStreet

The cryptocurrency market is recovering after a sell-off during late New York hours on Monday. At the time of writing, Bitcoin and all major altcoins are in a green zone since the beginning of the day, though the majority of coins are still nursing losses on a day-to-day basis. The total cryptocurrency market capitalization is registered at $249 billion from $253 billion the day before; an average daily trading volume decreased to $97 billion from $116 this time on Sunday; Bitcoin's market share decreased to 67.7%.

BTC/USD bottomed at $9,187 during late trading hours on Monday before retreating to $9,400 by the time of writing. Despite the recovery, the first digital coin is still down 3% from this time on Monday, moving within a short-term bearish trend amid decreasing volatility. Notably, the upper line of the Bollinger Band on a daily chart ($9,500) limits BTC/USD recovery. However, the ulimate resistance is located above $9,600 and created by SMA100 (Simple Moving Average) on a daily chart.Ethereum, the second-largest digital asset with the current market capitalization of $20 billion, has stayed mostly unchanged both on a day-to-day basis and gained 1.6% since the beginning of Monday. At the time of writing, ETH/USD is changing hands at $185.00, off the recent low of $181.08 touched on Monday. Looking technically, ETH/USD is well-positioned to continue the recovery as long as it stays above $180.00. The next bullish target of $190.00 is created by SMA100 daily.Ripples XRP failed to hold thee ground above $0.3000 and retreated to $0.2970 by the time of writing. The third digital coin with the current market value of $12.8 has lost 1% of its value on a day-to-day basis, while a failure to stay above $0.3000 worsened the short-term technical picture and pushed the price inside the previous range.

Read more:
The cryptocurrency market tries to get back on recovery track - FXStreet

Angel Investor Sues Bittrex, Claiming Cryptocurrency Exchange’s Unfair and Deceptive Acts Led to Million-Dollar Hack According to Lane Powell Law Firm…

SEATTLE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Gregg Bennett, a serial angel investor involved with more than 30 local startups, recently filed a lawsuit against Bellevue, Washington-based Bittrex, claiming the exchange violated or ignored its own security standards and industry-standard practices that allowed hackers to steal nearly $1 million dollars of bitcoin from Bennetts account in April.

The suit, filed in King County Superior Court, seeks to hold the exchange liable for the loss, based on what the suit describes as unfair and deceptive acts that misrepresented its level of security."

According to the suit, filed October 28, Bennett was initially the victim of a SIM card hack, an increasingly common scheme where hackers seize control of a victims cell phone SIM card and use it to gain access to accounts and passwords by impersonating the owner.

In this case, the hackers used Bennetts digital identity to assume control of a wide range of his personal accounts, including access to Bittrex, the cryptocurrency exchange he used to house his bitcoin.

The suit contends that on April 15, 2019, hackers accessed Bennetts account, converted the bitcoin to other currencies at below-market prices, and transferred the funds to an anonymous account under the hackers control.

Later that evening when Bennett discovered the hack, he attempted to alert Bittrex, but Bittrex failed to heed his warning for nearly two hours, allowing the hackers to continue to drain his account.

The hackers attempted a second withdrawal the next day, but by then Bittrex responded to Bennetts email, which is the only way the exchange accepts requests from depositors, even in urgent situations, the suit alleges.

As alleged in our complaint, Bittrex ignored a number of red flags warning Bittrex that the person initiating the withdrawal was not Gregg Bennett, said Dan Kittle of Lane Powell, a Seattle-based law firm representing Bennett. We plan to show in court that Bittrex either ignored or was unaware of standard industry safeguards to prevent hacks just like this.

The suit claims that Bittrex ignored or failed to observe a series of highly suspicious activity by the hackers, including the hackers use of a suspicious IP address, access by a different computer operating system, and failure to follow the industry-standard practice of placing a 24-hour hold on the account after a password and two-factor authentication change.

In August 2019, the Washington Department of Financial Institutions conducted an investigation into the theft and concluded that Bittrex did not take reasonable steps to stop funds from leaving Bennetts account, which the Department described as an unfair and deceptive act in violation of the Uniform Money Services Act.

Bittrex was bamboozled by hackers who should have been as visible as thieves wearing masks and carrying guns, Bennett added. I am asking for Bittrex to do the right thing by plugging what I see as gaping holes in their approach to security, and to return my coin to me.

Bennetts troubles with Bittrex didnt end after the hack, the suit contends.

Trying to convince Bittrex and Bittrex owner Bill Shihara that I was hacked also took a colossal effort, Bennett said. I had to virtually knock down Bills door for the company to take my issue seriously and acknowledge that theyd been duped by the hackers.

Had Bittrex shown the hackers half of the suspicion they showed me, we wouldnt be filing this suit, Bennett added.

Bennett said he is determined to understand why Bittrex failed to protect the safety of its customers and hopes to educate others, protecting consumers from becoming victims of similar wrongful acts.

I am going to do everything I can to hold those responsible accountable for their actions, so other people arent victims of similar negligence, Bennett said.

Bennett is an entrepreneur who mentors local, Seattle-based technology companies. He has invested in more than 100 Northwest-based startup and early-stage companies. Bennett previously founded HBSI, which become the nation's largest provider of financial and clinical benchmarking information for large hospitals. The company was acquired by the Thomson Corporation.

Continued here:
Angel Investor Sues Bittrex, Claiming Cryptocurrency Exchange's Unfair and Deceptive Acts Led to Million-Dollar Hack According to Lane Powell Law Firm...

Trump Sides With Indicted Oligarch Over His Own Diplomat – The Daily Beast

President Donald Trump boosted a tweet Monday promoting a controversial allegation from an indicted Ukrainian oligarch: that a top U.S. diplomat put fabricated information about the mogul in a diplomatic cable.

That diplomat happens to be one of Democrats key impeachment witnesses. And that oligarch happens to have a long-standing beef with Joe Biden.

Scott Adams, a Washington, D.C., talk radio host, sent out a tweet Monday night about U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor, who delivered some of the impeachment inquirys most damaging testimony yet. The tweet alleged that Taylor lied about Ukrainian natural gas baron Dmytro Firtash in a cable to State Department headquarters in 2008. At issue was a conversation Taylor had with Firtash in Kyiv that December. Taylor wrote in a diplomatic cable (later published by WikiLeaks) that Firtash told him he had acknowledged ties to Russian organized crime figure [Semion] Seymon Mogilevich, one of the most notorious accused mobsters on the planet. According to Taylor, Firtash said he needed Mogilevich's approval to get into business in the first place, but had not committed any crimes in the course of his business.

When WikiLeaks published the cable in 2010, Firtash issued a statement on his website disputing its contents. Firtash, the statement claimed,has never stated, to anyone, at any time, that he needed or received permission from Mr. Mogilevich to establish any of his businesses.

Earlier this year, Firtash reiterated that defense. Without mentioning any American official by name, he said someone must have fabricated the detail about Mogilevich. Taylor, meanwhile, has defended the State Departments notes.

The Justice Department appears to side with Taylor; its lawyers have argued in court that Firtash has ties to Russian organized crime. The criminal charges he faces, however, dont involve any such alleged relationships. Instead, the Justice Department charged him in 2014 with helming a conspiracy to bribe Indian government officials.

Trumps retweet, however, offers a presidential thumbs-up to Firtashs side of the story, and raises a new line of attack on Taylors credibility for the presidents allies.

Asked about his sourcing for the allegations against Taylor, Adams told The Daily Beast, My sources are solid Foggy Bottom people. He also noted the explanation for the cable that Firtash provided to The Daily Beast earlier this year.

This specific defense of Firtash took hold in The Hill over the summer, when columnist John Solomon, whose articles informed Rudy Giulianis Biden-Ukraine investigation, published a piece in July claiming that Special Counsel Robert Muellers deputy said Firtashs criminal charges in the U.S. might go away if he shared damaging information about Trump with Muellers team. Solomon cited multiple sources with direct knowledge and contemporaneous memos. Firtash and Solomon share the same lawyers: Victoria Toensing and Joe diGenova. The husband-wife team are veterans of the conservative movements most contentious legal battles, with longstanding ties in the Justice Department and Trump administration.

Read the rest here:
Trump Sides With Indicted Oligarch Over His Own Diplomat - The Daily Beast

Can We Predict the Next Leaker Using Threat Profiling Techniques? – In Public Safety

By Erik Kleinsmith,Associate Vice President, Public Sector Outreach, American Military University

Intelligencewhether you look at it as a community, business, or professionis inextricably bound by secrecy and security. Not only do intelligence personnel routinely collect and analyze highly sensitive and classified information about national threats, but these professionals must also actively work to protect that information from getting into the hands of adversaries and those who wish harm upon our nation.

Security is so important to the success of intelligence that professionals who specialize in information, network, and physical security have evolved along parallel trajectories over the past decades. Yet, despite the billions of dollars spent every year on each of these areas of security, its not enough to contain 100 percent of information leaks.

As recent embarrassing news stories can attest, leakers continually plague U.S. intelligence and national security. Leakers are individuals who share sensitive or classified information on a large scale, typically using the media as a conduit for their actions. These individuals are very different than spies, who often steal information for use by a foreign government or entity.

A recent example of a leaker is 30-year old Henry Kyle Frese, a counterterrorism analyst with the Defense Intelligence Agency who was arrested for leaking classified information to an NBC and a CNBC reporter, one of whom he was in a romantic relationship with. Frese now faces up to 20 years in prison for his poor decisions and joins the ranks of other notorious leakers including:

While some interesting analysis arises from looking at each of these five prominent leakers separately, in order to predict who might be the next leaker, its important to evaluate and identify any patterns or commonalities among them.

One way to analyze the group is to apply threat profiling techniques. Threat profiling is a predictive analysis tool that can help organize information related to different threat groups, prioritize analysis, and present the analysis within a common framework so the information can be widely shared and understood.

When evaluating this group, one of the most significant outcomes is how little they have in common. The leakers share little in the way of their demographics, selected targets, or methods of operation. Theres not much commonality beyond the fact that they all leaked classified information.

In analyzing demographic information, their ages range from 22 (Manning) to 40 (Ellsberg). Each were employed in a different government agency within the U.S. Intelligence Community or Department of Defense. Two were military or government employees at the time of their leaks (Manning and Frese), while the rest were contractors in government service (Winner, Snowden, and Ellsberg). Three of the five were military veterans (Winner, Frese, and Snowden, albeit for only a few months). They differed in their education levels as well, ranging from achieving a Ph.D. (Ellsberg) to just holding a high school degree (Winner).

There is also no common pattern in their gender, with one female (Winner), three males (Snowden, Frese, and Ellsberg), and one male who now identifies as a female (Manning).

Analysts could go further into each individuals upbringing, social class, and even religion, but beyond the fact that they are all white, there are no discernable patterns that could help identify or predict which type of person may be most susceptible to becoming the next big leaker.

In analyzing other areas of the threat profile, we find that each leaker targeted different types of information and used different methods to spirit this information from inside a secure facility. Individuals used a photocopier (Ellsberg), a printer (Winner), a mobile phone (Frese), burned information to a CD (Manning), or downloaded documents to an SD card (Snowden).

In addition, they each had to find someone in the media who would be supportive of their cause and willing to broadcast the information. This was not a difficult task for any of them, especially after the creation of WikiLeaks.

To find at least one significant commonality, one must look elsewhere within the threat profile and analyze the motivations, goals, and objectives of each leaker.

Here we find that each leaker decided that their personal or political viewpoints were more important than the national security of the United States. Only one of them was politically active at the time of their leak (Ellsberg), but all of them had broadcasted their political views on social media, which was, at times, at odds with their job or position.

Whether they wanted to assist the career of their girlfriend (Frese), felt that the U.S. was doing something immoral or illegal (Snowden, Ellsberg), or simply wanted to personally affect national policy through embarrassment, each one of the leakers decided that sharing highly sensitive information with the worldincluding our enemieswas a better option than pursuing proper channels such as through an inspector general or legal office (although Snowden disputes this claim).

Identifying this commonality of motive is highly disturbing because it is the most difficult to predict, interdict, or minimize damage caused afterwards. Leakers and other insider threats only have to be successful once, while security professionals have to be successful all the time. In this regard, intelligence agencies and organizations are in a bind, having to take responsibility for leakers within their organization while at the same time being blamed for not sharing intelligence when tragedy occurs.

It is often stated over and over again that politics ruins intelligence. Leakers who choose to jeopardize national security in support of their own political viewpoints are the embodiment of that statement in the most visible and destructive way.

About the Author:Erik Kleinsmithis the Associate Vice President for Business Development inIntelligence, National & Homeland Security, and Cyber for American Military University. He is a former Army Intelligence Officer and the former portfolio manager for Intelligence & Security Training at Lockheed Martin. Erik is one of the subjects of a book entitledThe Watchers by Shane Harris, which covered his work on a program called Able Danger tracking Al-Qaeda prior to 9/11. He currently resides in Virginia with his wife and two children. To contact the authors, emailIPSauthor@apus.edu.For more articles featuring insight from industry experts, subscribe toIn Public Safetys bi-monthly newsletter.

Sign up now to receive the InPublicSafety eNewsletter.

See original here:
Can We Predict the Next Leaker Using Threat Profiling Techniques? - In Public Safety