Bitcoin’s Next Decade Will Be Shaped by Derivatives – Bitcoin News

The last five years have been a test phase for bitcoin derivatives, which began tentatively when Bitmex eased into life in 2014. Now, as the cryptoconomy prepares to enter a new decade, derivatives products will play a pivotal role in price discovery. 2020 will be a big year for bitcoin and for the futures markets where billions of dollars will be won and lost, and the next bull market will begin.

Also read: South Korea Imposes $69M Tax Obligation on Crypto Exchange Bithumb

In 2019, crypto futures volumes approached those of spot trading. In 2020, futures are on course to blow right past spot levels and keep on trucking. The success of derivatives platforms Binance Futures and Bitmex, as well as new products from the likes of FTX, Dydx, and Synthetix, has convinced many that 2020 could be the Year of Derivatives. And U.S. regulators are lending credence to the notion: Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the independent regulator that governs the countrys futures and options markets, recently hinted that it could approve a new crypto-based derivative product backed by Ethereum in the course of 2020.

Out-of-the-box products serve to attract new players and new capital to the crypto derivatives market. But will the spate of novel products capture sufficient volume and play a role in shaping bitcoins price action in the coming year? And if so, who stands to benefit most?

Singapore exchange Bybit is planning to move into Thai, Turkish, Vietnamese and Spanish markets, Okexs new USDT-margined Perpetual Swap Trading is likely to gain traction, and decentralized derivatives products are expected to see broader usage as defi adoption continues. Synthetix the second largest defi app in the Ethereum ecosystem has just announced a partnership with Chainlink, meaning it no longer needs to rely on centralized price feeds for its derivatives trading mechanism.

Todays traders are now spoilt for choice, with bitcoin futures trading platforms feeding their appetite for high leverage on an array of digital assets. Traders arent limited to BTC and ETH, either: they can long or short altcoins such as cardano, enjin, tomo, and stellar if theyre feeling bold.

Improved fiat-crypto gateways such as Plutus virtual bank account and debit card have also increased the appeal of derivatives exchanges to retail investors, who are no longer locked into tether (USDT). Enhanced crypto-fiat conversion means traders can spend or reinvest their profits without needing to jump through multiple hoops. Services like Plutus enable crypto and fiat to be changed within a single app, forming the launchpad and off-ramp for traders seeking exposure to the broader cryptoconomy. Better fiat connections are often overlooked when assessing the health of derivatives markets, but these gateways are vital in driving capital in-flows.

In terms of institutional interest in bitcoin futures, the U.S., where much of the innovation is happening, will dictate matters. One platform seeking to play a major role is Bakkt, which launched bitcoin options and cash-settled futures in the U.S. at the tail-end of 2019. While the former is the first regulated bitcoin futures contract rubber-stamped by the CFTC, the latter will initially be available via the ICE Futures Singapore exchange. In December, open interest on Bakkt bitcoin futures reached an all-time high of $6.5 million and with the ascension of CEO Kelly Loeffler to the U.S. Senate, the next 12 months are shaping up to be interesting.

Bakkt isnt the only platform contributing to a market that has evolved greatly since traders first sought to profit from falling prices during the 2018 downturn. Binances bitcoin derivatives surpassed the volumes of its spot offering at various times in 2019, leading the juggernaut to invest an undisclosed sum in derivatives platform FTX. This after it had already acquired spot and derivatives exchange JEX, a move which enabled Binance to add options and futures to its platform.

Speaking of bitcoin derivatives, CME Groups Tim McCourt recently celebrated the two-year anniversary of the exchanges operations in this field. In a short article noting the markets forward curve, he revealed that CME had traded over 2.4 million contracts with a notional value exceeding $92 billion from 12.5 million BTC. Some speculate that the growing interest of trading exchanges like Bakkt and CME stems from reduced BTC volatility in comparison to previous years. In any case, the preponderance of such platforms gives derivatives traders plenty of options.

As derivatives players vie for market share, battlegrounds are coming into clearer focus. Blade, the San Francisco-based exchange supported by Silicon Valley venture capitalists, just announced its commitment to zero-fee trading a flagrant affront to perpetual swap titan Bitmex. UMAs Bitdex specification also presents a possible route to non-custodial perpetual swaps, though more work is required to develop this concept.

So what does all this surging activity mean for bitcoins price? According to Meltem Demirors, chief strategy officer of Coinshares, the growth of the crypto derivatives market means that bitcoins price is becoming less relevant which will keep it in check even after the halving. Demirors believes that bitcoins evolution into an investable asset will, in effect, decouple its price from both its value and supply and demand. With the crypto derivatives market coming to wider attention, a greater number of investors may also choose to hedge their positions via derivatives to manage price risk, leading to less volatility.

All told, the bitcoin derivatives market looks to be in rude health, even if it remains small when compared to other commodities markets. For one thing, traditional investors are likely to be enticed into crypto as a consequence of their familiarity, since derivatives are routinely used in regular financial markets. In fact, a great many institutional traders have thus far been reluctant to engage with crypto due to a paucity of tools to hedge trades and manage risk. 2020, then, and the decade it heads should bring greater leverage for crypto derivatives, including those in the defi ecosystem, greater liquidity, and greater competition from players old and new.

Do you think derivatives markets will dictate bitcoins price action in 2020? Let us know in the comments section below.

Images courtesy of Shutterstock.

Did you know you can verify any unconfirmed Bitcoin transaction with our Bitcoin Block Explorer tool? Simply complete a Bitcoin address search to view it on the blockchain. Plus, visit our Bitcoin Charts to see whats happening in the industry.

Kai's been manipulating words for a living since 2009 and bought his first bitcoin at $12. It's long gone. He's previously written whitepapers for blockchain startups and is especially interested in P2P exchanges and DNMs.

Read more:

Bitcoin's Next Decade Will Be Shaped by Derivatives - Bitcoin News

Bitcoin Gained 8.9 Million Percent Over the Last Decade – Bitcoin News

2020 is fast approaching and the last decade will be behind us. Throughout the last ten years, the biggest unicorn firms were born like Uber and Airbnb. However, even though Bitcoin isnt a company, the best investment of the decade belongs to the decentralized cryptocurrency Satoshi created. In fact, Bank of Americas recent securities report highlights that an investment of $1 in bitcoin at the start of 2010 would now be worth more than $90,000.

Also read: Regulatory Roundup New US Crypto Bill, Frances 1st Approved ICO, Muslim Crypto

This week, a great number of people are reminiscing about the last ten years and a slew of individuals understand that the advent of Bitcoin was quite significant during this period of time. The most valuable startup of the last decade didnt raise money, didnt have employees, gave away the cap table, and let anyone invest, said the popular philosopher Naval Ravikant. Besides Ravikants opinion, theres data that shows bitcoin was the best investment during the last decade.

Bank of Americas recent securities paper explains that between 2010 and 2020, oil has weakened and negative interest rates have been good for gold markets. But if a person invested $1 in bitcoin in 2010, it would be worth well over $90k today, BoAs report underlined. Because of bitcoins great performance record, the decentralized asset has surpassed every investment vehicle in the last ten years.

Now lets just say someone followed gold bug Peter Schiffs advice and invested in gold in 2010, which was trading for $1,113 per Troy ounce at the years open. Ten years later, gold has done well for itself touching a high of $1,542 per ounce and thats a fairly decent +38% gain. In the last decade bitcoin, however, has gained a whopping +8,999,900% and this year alone, BTC has outpaced golds market performance in the last ten years. In 2019, BTC has gained +96% compared to golds +10.8% increase.

Besides precious metals, if Bitcoin was a company it also outpaced investments in the most profitable unicorn businesses created in the last decade. Profitable startups throughout 2010 and 2020 include Uber, Facebook, Airbnb, Snapchat, Spacex, Tesla, and Pinterest but an investment in bitcoin surpasses all these public stocks by a long shot. For example, if you compare the +8.9 million percent BTC gain to investments in Netflix (+4,177%), Amazon (+1,787%), Apple (+966%), Microsoft (+556%), Disney (+423%) and Google (+335%), numbers show there is no comparison. The angel investor and former CTO of Coinbase, Balaji Srinivasan, recently explained his thoughts about the cryptocurrency revolution during the last decade compared to the decades unicorn firms.

As the decade ends, the biggest unicorn of the 2010s wasnt Uber, Airbnb, or Snap It was Bitcoin, Srinivasan tweeted. Please note that all three of these [companies] and many other unicorns are great companies I take nothing away from them. But to my knowledge, nothing else founded in the same timeframe held at $100 billion for a longer time. Srinivasan added:

From an investor standpoint, this is important to know.

A number of crypto proponents agree with Srinivasan and Ravikants statements about cryptocurrencies throughout the last ten years and the subject is often discussed on forums and social media. Replying to Srinivasans tweet, former Bitcoin Foundation director Bruce Fenton said:

[Bitcoin did all of this] without a centralized marketing fund, no salespeople, no roadshow people pitching sovereign wealth funds or family offices and no fundraise or premine.

Even though the digital asset was the best investment of the decade, it also provided significant innovation, financial disruption, and changed the way people perceive money. People can bypass corporations, financial institutions, and governments in a censorship-resistant fashion like never before. Its safe to say that cryptocurrency innovation will make the next ten years quite revolutionary.

What do you think about how bitcoin is the best investment in the last decade? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation, endorsement, or sponsorship of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Image credits: Shutterstock, Twitter, Moneymorning.com, Pixabay, Fair Use, and Wiki Commons.

Did you know you can buy and sell BCH privately using our noncustodial, peer-to-peer Local Bitcoin Cash trading platform? The local.Bitcoin.com marketplace has thousands of participants from all around the world trading BCH right now. And if you need a bitcoin wallet to securely store your coins, you can download one from us here.

Jamie Redman is a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source code, and decentralized applications. Redman has written thousands of articles for news.Bitcoin.com about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

Visit link:

Bitcoin Gained 8.9 Million Percent Over the Last Decade - Bitcoin News

Economist Brands Bitcoin a Scam and Ponzi Scheme on Yahoo Finance – Ethereum World News

For the longest time, critics ofBitcoinhave questioned if the cryptocurrency is a Ponzi-like/pyramid scheme.

Wikipedia defines a Ponzi scheme: A Ponzi scheme is a form of fraud that lures investors and pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors.

While this is rather ambiguous, critics say that this applies to Bitcoin, for the cryptocurrency, due to the inflationary pressures of block rewards and such, requires constant capital input for prices to maintain their current levels of growth. The idea the critics that believe Bitcoin is a Ponzi tout is that without fresh capital, this market would collapse, much like a pyramid scheme would if new investors stopped entering the pyramid.

Once again, Bitcoin has been given the Ponzi scheme and scam treatment. This time, it was on a Yahoo Finance segment covering the cryptocurrency market.

Tendayi Kapfidze Lending Tree Chief Economist recently sat down with the media outlet to talk Bitcoin. While the hosts branded the cryptocurrency an investment, or at least as a speculative investment, Kapfidze said that he thinks its a Ponzi and a scam, claiming that he believes you can only make money in the cryptocurrency space by taking what others put in. Kapfidze continued that he thinks this space has yielded no technological developments or applications with inherent value.

Peter Schiff, a prominent gold proponent and anti-government investor (someone that would like Bitcoins seeming premise in another reality), has echoed this sentiment in the past. Per previous reports from this very outlet, the Bitcoin hater quipped that BTC is only popular as a speculative asset, not as a currency, before going as far as to say that as Google Trends shows, BTC is running out of new buyers to keep the Ponzi going.

Whether or not you believe Bitcoin is a Ponzi or not, its been very lucrative as a speculative asset over the years, not to mention that it is functional as a medium of exchange and as a long-term store of value.

Over the past decade, the price of the leading cryptocurrency has surged by a jaw-dropping 9,000,000%, making it the best performing asset of all time, not to mention that it saw these gains within a ten-year time span, which is relatively irrelevant on a macro basis.

Even in the past year alone, Bitcoin has surged by 95%, outpacing the stock market by triple and other top asset classes by dozens of percent. This strong performance comes in spite of the 50% downturn that has taken place since the peak of $14,000 was established in June.

Continued here:

Economist Brands Bitcoin a Scam and Ponzi Scheme on Yahoo Finance - Ethereum World News

Nano Achieves Nearly 4 Times Bitcoins Confirmed Daily Transaction Throughput – The Merkle Hash

The scaling of different cryptocurrencies remains crucial. Nano, an often overlooked altcoin, is seemingly on the right track to achieve this goal.

All of these discussions need to be taken with a grain of salt.

Altcoins often tend to scale better than bitcoin, yet it doesnt necessarily help them gain traction.

Even so, Nano seems to be achieving a respectable throughput these days.

In recent days, the Nano network has seen an influx of transactions.

This is not an actual stress test, but rather someone flooding the network.

Why this action is undertaken, remains a mystery.

The results of this test are rather interesting, however.

Nano has now achieved over 1,700,000 confirmed daily transactions.

This is nearly four times as many transactions compared to bitcoin.

Rather than crumbling, it appears that this altcoins network can handle the load rather easily.

Given how big of a problem network congestion can be, Nano appears to be doing something right.

How this will impact the future use of this altcoin, is a different matter entirely.

The majority of people interested in cryptocurrency wont look past the market cap top 25.

Nanos current market cap isnt even near those levels at this time.

Image(s): Shutterstock.com

Read more from the original source:

Nano Achieves Nearly 4 Times Bitcoins Confirmed Daily Transaction Throughput - The Merkle Hash

Bitcoin exhibited recurring patterns over 2019, similar to the ones seen in nature – AMBCrypto

The leaves that bud out of the stem, the pattern on the shell of snails, the petals of flowers; all of these have a common denominator, a pattern. Nature follows a particular kind of symmetry. The world that we live in has many mysteries to it, many that might seem chaotic to naked eyes. However, there seems to be a pattern emerging out of this seemingly chaotic world and the only way to look at this pattern would be to zoom out and look at the bigger picture.

Mystified by it, the Greeks and the Romans used the pattern in all of their structures. The repetition of these patterns is called fractals. Every decision we take might seem arbitrary, but we are collectively influenced by a higher power; not that of a higher being, but of nature.

Perhaps, the most apparent example is the stock market. Although people in stock markets are out to make profits, a pattern can be seen in the price charts; an inescapable pattern, be it Bitcoin, S&P500, DotCom bubble, gold rush, etc.

Despite our conscious efforts to stray away from the path, on a larger time scale, human behavior seems to converge, forming a repeating pattern. Over the course of 2019, Bitcoin has repeated itself, forming a fractal. To people who caught it, they had an opportunity to seize a good profit.

Similar patterns can still be identified in Bitcoin over different timescales. For this purpose, 2019 is split into 4 phases,

The period saw Bitcoin moving sideways. The price had just spiraled from $6,000 to $3,000, BTC was trying to recover from this massive collapse and hence, the sideways/stagnation. Moreover, this period is observed to have huge pumps and dumps in succession, especially on the 4-hour chart. These pumps and dumps can also be categorized as BART patterns.

To most, this period was the accumulation phase as the price had collapsed from a whopping $20,000 in December 2017 to a shocking $3,000. There was widespread miner capitulation, rampant FUD and fear in the community. Most altcoins and projects got obliterated to dust in this period.

In hindsight, the rise in April 2019 wasnt a mysterious concept. However, the surge in April came as a shock to most people in the community. No one could explain the sudden rise. While some attributed it to Asian markets, others stated that it was a fools rally and a bull squeeze. To everybodys surprise, the rally did not stop as it kept growing in size, exponentially, with each passing month. There was a paradigm shift during this phase as the bearish momentum flipped and became bullish.

The growth hit a ceiling on June 26, 2019, when Bitcoin reached a staggering $13,800. A 242% rise in under 86 days. Bitcoin showed everybody why it was a whole new game. Moreover, this period showed excessive growth when compared to the previous phase as the surges were much higher, easily more than 7% [highest pump/dump in the previous phase].

The excessive growth phase had no patterns forming as this was an unnatural rise in Bitcoins price. It was also a mini bull-run encapsulated within an extended bear cycle.

This periods correction lasted for 3 months and it ended with a massive drop in Bitcoins price. Bitcoin corrected by 42% in this phase as the price fell from $13,800 to $8,000. Just like the rally that preceded it, this dump was also uncontrollable. An interesting observation here is the fractal within Bitcoins bear cycle, as mentioned above.

Unlike the period of excessive growth, it was possible to do a technical analysis of Bitcoin. There were various patterns being formed in this phase, falling wedges, Bart patterns, rising wedges, etc.

As the name suggests, this period was Bitcoins journey to find the second bottom, a foothold, so to speak, for it to rally higher. Although the halving is a few months away, the price seems to be dropping, which is a complete negation of the narrative surrounding halving.

Speaking to AMBCrypto, Digitalik.net, a Bitcoin analyst, stated,

History has shown to us two times already that halving is very important event so I dont believe this time would be any different. If miners are to continue mining 50% less with same amount of hardware, electricity and manpower then this has to affect the price. The question is how big the magnitude will be but nobody can say this.

This phase consisted of multiple Bart patterns occurring in succession, rising and falling wedges, etc. At press time, the price of Bitcoin hovered below the $7,500 level, with Bitcoin dominance at 68.6%.

According to ChartsBTC, based on Bitcoin halving cycles, the price of Bitcoin is supposed to hit anywhere between $29K to $47K in 2020. With respect to the fast-approaching halving, Digitalik.net added,

I believe halving will have impact. The only question is how big.

On the adoption front, Bitcoin still has a long way to go. Although built as a decentralized peer-to-peer currency, Bitcoin is still far away from achieving this goal. Even with second-layer solutions, Bitcoin is still nowhere close to speeds [transaction finality and settlement] that the traditional financial infrastructure provides. As an example, Bitcoins tps is exponentially lower than what XRP and its blockchain can provide.

As for what the price of Bitcoin is going to be in 2020, nobody knows. As the price of BTC hovers in the $7,500 region, it could explode any minute and start its bull run, or it could sink lower, perhaps, hitting the same bottom as in December 2018. However, some people in the Bitcoin ecosystem are still bent on seeing BTC rally before the halving event, which is scheduled for March 2020.

Read the original:

Bitcoin exhibited recurring patterns over 2019, similar to the ones seen in nature - AMBCrypto

36C3: Open Source Is Insufficient To Solve Trust Problems In Hardware – Hackaday

With open source software, weve grown accustomed to a certain level of trust that whatever we are running on our computers is what we expect it to actually be. Thanks to hashing and public key signatures in various parts in the development and deployment cycle, its hard for a third party to modify source code or executables without us being easily able to spot it, even if it travels through untrustworthy channels.

Unfortunately, when it comes to open source hardware, the number of steps and parties involved that are out of our control until we have a final product production, logistics, distribution, even the customer makes it substantially more difficult to achieve the same peace of mind. To make things worse, to actually validate the hardware on chip level, youd ultimately have to destroy it.

On his talk this year at the 36C3, [bunnie] showed a detailed insight of several attack vectors we could face during manufacturing. Skipping the obvious ones like adding or substituting components, hes focusing on highly ambitious and hard to detect modifications inside an ICs package with wirebonded or through-silicon via (TSV) implants, down to modifying the netlist or mask of the integrated circuit itself. And these arent any theoretical or what if scenarios, but actual possible options of course, some of them come with a certain price tag, but in the end, with the right motivation, money is only a detail.

Sure, none of this is particularly feasible or even much of interest at all for a blinking LED project, but considering how more and more open source hardware projects emerge to replace fully proprietary components, especially with a major focus on privacy, a lack of trust in the hardware involved along the way is surely worrying to say the least. At this point, there is no perfect solution in sight, but FPGAs might just be the next best thing, and the next part of the talk is presenting the Betrusted prototype that [bunnie] is working on together with [xobs] and [Tom Marble]. That alone makes the talk worth watching, in our view.

Read the original:
36C3: Open Source Is Insufficient To Solve Trust Problems In Hardware - Hackaday

The year in #StupidSecurity 2019’s biggest security and privacy blunders – The Daily Swig

Flagrant tales of epic (security) fails

Stupid criminals, careless politicians, inept bug handling, and more slapdash or just plain stupid behavior were abundant in the arena of cybersecurity over the past 12 months.

Everyone involved in this year's #StupidSecurity run-down ought to resolve to do better in 2020, perhaps by starting to cast an eye over examples of the people and organizations whove handled infosec problems with a bit more grace, preparation, and better passwords. Sounds familiar..

Bug bounties and ethical hacking particularly in the field of web security are a major topic of interest for The Daily Swig.

Vendor missteps are legion but sometimes its the bug hunters who get it wrong.

Back in July, developers of the VLC media player were able to debunk widely covered reports of a critical security issue in their popular open source software.

Jean-Baptiste Kempf, president of VLC owner VideoLAN,told The Daily Swig that the exploit did not work on the latest VLC build. In fact, it turned out that any potential issues related to the vulnerability were patched more than a year ago.

CERT-Bund which initially flagged the issue as critical - downgraded the vulnerability to low impact after we challenged the organization on its originally published classification, which was based largely on a public ticket.

Missteps in bug handling are more common on the vendor rather than researcher side, of course.

July brought the discovery of a Zoom client bug that allowed any site to force Mac users into video chat.

Security researcher Jonathan Leitschuh went public with a vulnerability in the Mac version of the Zoom video conferencing app that could allow a malicious site to auto-join Mac users to a video call and enable their webcam without permission.

Security researchers faulted Zoom for its initially dismissive response to the issue.

Check out the latest bug bounty and security news

Capital One grabbed news headlines in July when the US financial services company announced that some information of approximately 106 million people residing in the US and Canada had been exposed.

The criminal breach also compromised more sensitive information on a smaller number of customers: 140,000 Social Security numbers, 1 million Canadian Social Insurance numbers, and 80,000 bank account numbers.

Capital One tried to deflect attention from this aspect of the problem, much to the derision of the security community.

The alleged perpetrator, Paige A. Thompson, gained access through a misconfiguration of a cloud-hosted web application, according to prosecutors.

On a much smaller scale, the Dutch Data Protection Authority was left red-faced back in May after it failed to report itself on time over a minor data breach, caused by one of its own employees.

Oops.

DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) an emerging web protocol that aims to protect online privacy online became the arena for policy controversies this year.

The technology is supported by browser makers including Google and Mozilla but criticized by some because of its reliance on third-party DNS providers, among other reasons.

The Internet Service Providers Association (ISPA) controversially argued that DoH impedes web blocking programs going as far as nominating Mozilla as an internet villain over its support of the technology.

The ISPA trade association was obliged to backtrack and pull the nomination after a backlash from sections of the internet security community.

What could be a more awkward if not plain ridiculous situation than to be arrested while doing your job?

But thats what happened to two staff at US security consultancy Coalfire, who were arrested during late night physical pen tests at a courthouse in Dallas County, Iowa, back in September.

Dallas County Iowa Sheriff Chad Leonard told The Daily Swig that he acted properly in arresting the two infosec workers who went outside the scope of their contract.

In August, digital bank Monzo told hundreds of thousands of customers to change their PINs after it realized it was accidentally storing sensitive customer data in log files.

Monzo isnt alone when it comes to slip ups in this area.

For example, back in March it was revealed that Facebook had been logging web requests containing clear-text passwords for years.

Facebook came under fire once again months later, in September, over a data leak that exposed the phone numbers of hundreds of millions of its users.

Having had its share of privacy scandals, Facebook's all-caps rebrand in November to FACEBOOK was also widely mocked as tone deaf. A design that said reflective repentance may have been viewed as more appropriate.

Check out the latest data breach and security news

Last year in Stupid Security, Kanye West infamously exposed the PIN code of his phone in front of the spectating press corps during an Oval Office meeting with President Trump. The rapper was captured tapping in 000000 to unlock his iPhone.

But 2019 showed us that it's not only rappers who fall victim to easy to guess PIN codes.

In October Congressman Lance Gooden made much the same security slip up in revealing his phone password was 111111 by entering the code during a filmed Congressional session.

Gooden made light of his faux pas, choosing to disregard the part that hacking played in the 2016 US presidential election cycle or the sensitivity of the communications the first-term congressman handles.

The Republican congressman isnt alone in being captured by cameras in making a questionable security trade-offs.

Back in March, a video surfaced on Twitter that appeared to show Hashim Thai, the President of Kosovo, logging into his computer using an all-too-simple password.

Passwords remain a necessary evil despite predictions that were moving towards a passwordless future, a warm future thats perennially two or three years away..

One online resource, a Dumb Password Rules tool, spotlights firms that take an idiosyncratic approach to password policy.

Examples of curious policies include those of the BMO (Bank of Montreal), where users passwords must be exactly six characters long and include no special characters..

Entropy, theyve heard of it. Or perhaps they havent?!

LISTEN NOW SwigCast, Episode 4: MAGECART

John McAfee who we sense will become a fixture of this annual list backed up his support for a much criticised crypto-currency wallet last year with a stand-out performance in a different category, OpSec fail.

In July, McAfee posted pictures on Twitter that revealed that he was holed up in Vilnius, Lithuania, in a tin-foil lined room. The disclosure followed days after McAfee and his entourage were arrested after his yacht docked in the Dominican Republic over concerns that Army-grade weapons were on board.

The group were released without charge four days later before resurfacing in eastern Europe.

Criminals and police alike served up a steady diet of WTF moments in infosec over the last 12 months.

In January, a Microsoft employee chided the Chicago Police Department over claims the police forces Windows 7 machines were at the cutting edge of technology.

In July somebody hijacked the Met Polices official newsfeed and Twitter account, a small example of a wide field of slapdash security that involves what might loosely be described social media shenanigans.

Staying with police-related security missteps, Chinese citizen Yujing Zhang was arrested at Trumps Mar-a-Lago club in Florida with suspect items including multiple phones, two passports, and a USB stick that it turned out was stuffed full of malware.

It emerged that the US Secret Service trained security professionals, lest we forget plugged the suspect USB into one of their computers.

Not so much Bodyguard as the booby-trapped guards.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE Swig Security Review 2019: Part II

See the rest here:
The year in #StupidSecurity 2019's biggest security and privacy blunders - The Daily Swig

The Decade We Learned Theres No Such Thing as Privacy Online – VICE

In the past ten years, we lost hope in American politics, realized we were being watched on the internet, and finally broke the gender binary (kind of). So many of the beliefs we held to be true at the beginning of the decade have since been proved to be falseor at least, much more complicated than they once seemed. The Decade of Disillusion is a series that tracks how the hell we got here.

The last decade has seen no limit of scandals highlighting how personal privacy in the internet era doesnt actually exist. Whether were talking about wireless carriers selling your daily location data to any nitwit with a nickel, or incompetent executives leaving consumer data openly exposed on the Amazon cloud, calling the last decade ugly would be an understatement.

Whats more the government, utterly captured by the industries its supposed to hold accountable, has proven feckless in the face of the threat. The United States still lacks any meaningful law governing behavior in the internet era, and the glaring lack of accountability couldnt have been made any more obvious over the last ten years.

2010: The Rise of the Internet of Very Broken Things

During the late 90s and early aughts, internet of things evangelists routinely heralded a hyper-connected future, where everything from your refrigerator to your tea kettle would be connected to the internet. The end result, they promised, would be unprecedented convenience and a Jetsons-esque future, contributing to a simpler, more efficient existence.

The end result wasnt quite what was advertised.

A lack of any meaningful privacy or security safeguards quickly ruined the party, turning the IoT revolution into the butt of endless jokes. Throughout the decade, evidence emerged that everything from your smart television to your kids WiFi-enabled Barbie doll was easily hackable, showcasing that the smarter choice is often dumber, older tech.

May 2013: Edward Snowden reveals the NSA's surveillance dragnet

Snowden, the most famous whistleblower of a generation, gave thousands of classified NSA documents to journalists Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras. The documents showed in great detail how the post 9/11 intelligence apparatus was collecting data in bulk on American citizens and people around the world through programs like PRISM, XKeyscore, LoveINT, and a host of others. The revelations showed that the NSA had backdoors into the databases of many of Silicon Valley's largest companies, that it was surveilling world leaders and American allies, and that the U.S. government's surveillance state had become ever present in American life.

Snowden's revelations were published over the course of yearsthis slow drip of information kept Snowden, NSA surveillance, and privacy in the news, making it an ongoing national conversation over the entire decade.

August 2013: Hackers steal the data of 3 billion Yahoo users

In September 2016, as the company attempted to sell itself to Verizon, Yahoo belatedly revealed it had been the victim of a series of major hacks in 2013 and 2014. After initially claiming that 500 million users were impacted, it would later acknowledge that the hack impacted roughly 3 billion users, the biggest data breach in U.S. history.

Yahoo would ultimately have to pay a $35 million penalty to the Securities and Exchange Commission for pretending the hacks never happened, and another $80 million as part of a class action settlement. But as with most punishment, much of the money went to lawyers, and the penalties paled in comparison to the money made from monetizing user data.

2017: Congress helps big telecom kill FCC privacy rules

Big telecom has always had a flippant relationship when it comes to respecting your private data. For years ISPs quietly monetized your every online click, and have even charged customers significantly more if they wanted their privacy respected. In 2014, Verizon was busted modifying user data packets to covertly track users around the internet without telling them.

In 2016 the FCC under Tom Wheeler tried to do something about it, passing some modest broadband privacy rules that would have forced ISPs to be transparent about what data was collected and sold, and to whom. The rules would have also required that consumers opt in before ISPs and mobile carriers could share and sell more sensitive financial data.

But in 2017 the House and Senate voted to eliminate those rules at the behest of industry, opening the door to years of additional abuse by the sector.

March 2017: The Equifax hack heard around the world

The last decade saw no shortage of breaches that exposed mountains of personal data, be it the hack of Marriott (500 million customers), Adult Friend Finder (412.2 million users) or EBay (145 million). But none highlighted corporate incompetence or government fecklessness quite like the 2017 hack of Equifax, which exposed the financial data of 145 million Americans.

In part because data would later reveal that Equifax knew about the vulnerability and did nothing about it. But also because the punishment doled out by the FTCwhich included a $125 cash payout that disappeared when consumers went to collect itshowcased a feckless government incapable and unwilling to seriously rein in corporate Americas incompetence and greed.

2018: Facebook lets Cambridge Analytica abuse your private data

While Cambridges abuse of Facebook data was first reported in 2015, it wasnt until 2018 that people realized the full scope of the problem. For years Facebook casually allowed third-party app-makers unfettered access to consumer datasets, allowing outfits like Cambridge to weaponize your personal information in the lead up to the 2016 election.

Privacy experts like Gaurav Laroia tell Motherboard that pound for pound, no event in the last decade had as much of an impact on public perception as Facebooks epic face plant.

The Cambridge Analytical scandal had the right combination of scale, malfeasance, and consequence to sear into everyday Americans how companies like Facebook sell access to our personal information and how dangerous that can be, Laroia said.

That a researcher was able to take the profile information of tens of millions of Americans and sell it to an unscrupulous company with little consequence, in violation of an agreement with Facebook, showed how industry self-regulation has failed and why the government must act to protect our privacy, he added.

2019: Wireless carriers busted selling your cell phone location data

Thanks in no small part to Congress decision to kill FCC broadband privacy rules in 2017, theres been little penalty for telecom giants that abuse your private information. Case in point: Motherboards blockbuster January, 2019 investigation showing that wireless carriers routinely sell your every waking movement to a wide variety of often dubious middlemen.

The investigation resulted in numerous calls for action by politicians like Senator Ron Wyden, though to date nobodybe it the FCC or Congresshas actually lifted a finger to stop the practice or forced the deletion of decades worth of your daily location data.

The decades theme couldnt be more obvious: either via corruption, incompetence, or apathy, giant corporations routinely pay empty lip service to consumer privacy, before engaging in face plant after face plant. Just as often, the governments response to a chorus line of piracy scandals has ranged from underwhelming to nonexistent.

Part of the problem is US regulators enjoy a tiny fraction of the resources given to privacy regulators overseas, and thanks to industry lobbying, the U.S. still lacks any kind of meaningful privacy law for the internet era. While efforts are afoot to change that, a cross-industry coalition of lobbyists is working hard to ensure this dysfunctional status quo never changes.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

The rest is here:
The Decade We Learned Theres No Such Thing as Privacy Online - VICE

The surveillance decade and the rise of the smart camera – The National

Ten years ago, British prosecutors finally nailed the terrorists who changed the face of international air travel. Making life smoother for passengers has taken longer.

Three ringleaders in September 2009 were finally convicted of plotting to bomb transatlantic aeroplanes using liquid bombs disguised as harmless drinks.

They intended to kill even more people than in the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, according to security officials, before the plot was broken up in its early stages.

Even though their plans were foiled in 2006, the plotters had a major impact. The plot led to a global ban on carrying liquids aboard aircraft including, in the early days, ink-filled pens causing chaos at departure gates, delays and the cancellations of hundreds of flights.

A decade later, security officials still grapple with the fallout from the plot as some restrictions remain on carrying fluids aboard aircraft, with knock-on effects of delays and queues at security.

The National witnessed technology under development in a crowded laboratory in the Welsh capital of Cardiff that only now has the potential to bring back the travel experience of the pre-plot days.

But the techniques to screen people and their belongings incorporating artificial intelligence, machine learning and scanning techniques used by astronomers highlight the increased sophistication of technology needed to tackle modern terrorism.

From smart cameras on streets to facial recognition software, the march of science in confronting terrorism has been accompanied by public disquiet about what it means to live in a society subject to often unseen scrutiny.

In the past decade, concerns have grown over the nature of "mass surveillance" of populations, as revealed in leaks by US National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, challenging politicians to consider what people are prepared to accept to stay safe.

Western governments have been accused of sweeping up huge amounts of information with little evidence that this has improved security. Police in the UK have suggested they foiled at least 22 attacks since March 2017, but the benefits of surveillance technology are not always clear to the public because of the secrecy of the work.

It is extremely difficult, if not impossible to evaluate the effectiveness of surveillance programmes, said Dutch academics Michelle Cayford and Wolter Pieters, of the Delft University of Technology, in a 2018 paper that looked at what intelligence officials thought about how well surveillance technology worked.

Intelligence work is like putting together pieces of a puzzle it becomes difficult to evaluate one small piece of the puzzle that by itself seems insignificant but is necessary for the completion of the picture.

Britain has been cited by campaigners as one of the most-surveilled societies in the western world. A study by the BBC in 2009 suggested one south London borough had more security cameras than in the cities of Boston, Johannesburg and Dublin combined.

The decade started with police in Britains second city of Birmingham apologising for putting 200 security cameras in two largely Muslim areas. Most of the cameras were designed to identify car number plates moving in and out of the areas, a technique first developed in the 1970s in the UK.

Community leaders were led to believe that the cameras were supposed to stop crime and anti-social behaviour. But police were forced to remove them when it emerged they were funded in part from a counter-terrorism budget, sparking anger that innocent Muslims were being unfairly targeted.

Similar complaints with more advanced technology continue, with police in London forced to apologise at the end of this decade after sharing images of crime suspects with private land owners operating cameras using facial-recognition software.

The technology scans faces in a crowd and checks them against a watch list of suspects but the London scheme was operating across a newly-developed site without oversight from any public body.

And the police in South Wales which is leading the development of the technology was taken to court in a separate case over the mass scanning of crowds. Police won the case but face further scrutiny from regulators over the technique.

Facial recognition cameras have crept onto our streets, making border style security and frequent identity checks a norm, said privacy group Big Brother Watch, which has campaigned against the technology.

But a rash of terrorist attacks in the UK since 2017 including by a suicide bomber at a pop concert in Manchester that killed 22 and three attacks at landmark bridges in the capital have increased concerns about terrorism in the public mind and persuaded government to act.

Alongside low-tech solutions such as car-stopping bollards in public places, the private sector has invested in increasingly smart ways to protect the public.

Technology developed to study deep-space objects has been adapted by a British company to create the airport scanner intended to end the long queues at security checkpoints.

The scanner picks up heat signatures to map a subject and then uses artificial intelligence to identify potentially dangerous items hidden under clothing. The system is so sensitive that it can identify a 100-watt lightbulb from 800,000 kilometres away.

The system has the potential to speed up the security process by five times as the passengers do not need to take off their outer clothing or stand still while they are scanned, according to the developers based at Cardiff University.

The developers have already received significant interest in the system from the Middle East, according to Sequestim, the commercial venture based at the Welsh university.

They say those being scanned would not necessarily notice they were being scanned. Any warning of a potentially dangerous object hidden beneath clothing would be transmitted to a member of security via an earpiece.

The National saw a prototype of the scanner in action at Cardiff with researchers tucking a gun, bullets and other objects inside their clothing. The fake firearm showed up as a dark gun-shaped patch against a body shape. The system is set to be tested at a UK airport in 2020.

Ken Wood, of Sequestim, said the company had received inquiries from national border security units. They said it would be ideal to protect royal palaces, places where VIPs gathered, sports stadiums, prisons and for use in airports, where the company hopes to place its cameras from 2021.

We can screen people walking down the street or entering public buildings so theres an enormous application for public safety in any areas where people gather in large numbers, he said.

In the aviation world, theres a huge problem. The number of people flying is set to double in 10 to 15 years. The strain on security infrastructure at airports is enormous and it will continue to grow.

Updated: December 30, 2019 08:34 PM

Read more here:
The surveillance decade and the rise of the smart camera - The National

lattice-based cryptography – All news and posts by – Crowdfund Insider

How to Exchange Litecoin to Ethereum

The first quarter of the twenty-firstcentury has primarily been dominatedby the evolution of digitalcurrencies. It's hardly a decade agowhen Satoshi Nakamoto introduced thefirst cryptocurrency (bitcoin), but ...

Self Publish a Press Release on Crowdfund Insider [Beta]

Crowdfund Insider is introducing anew feature for individuals andbusinesses that would like toself-publish a press release directlyonto our site. We receive numerous ...

Elate Helps Organizations Power Growth, Streamline Operations with New Fully Integrated Software

First-of-its kind operations softwarelaunches with $530,000 in funding andis now available for scalingbusinesses INDIANAPOLIS (Oct. 22, ...

Crypto Bank Black Banx is turning the World of Crypto Upside down

Since digital banking platformblackbanx.co launched in late 2015,it gained massive traction in theworld of crypto and offshore banking.No wonder Black Banx seams to be the ...

Finaeo Secures $5.35 Million to Transform the Distribution of Insurance

TORONTO (PRWEB)MARCH 26, 2019Today,Finaeoannounces a $5.35Mfunding round, led by fintech-focusedinvestorLuge Capital, supported ...

Read the original post:
lattice-based cryptography - All news and posts by - Crowdfund Insider