Edward Snowden Is Doing Great On Twitter (2020-01-04) – Global Real News

Bonjour! Today we did a serious analysis of Edward Snowdens Twitter activity. Lets get started. These are the main things: as of 2020-01-04, Edward Snowden (@Snowden) has 4209383 Twitter followers, is following 1 people, has tweeted 4637 times, has liked 489 tweets, has uploaded 377 photos and videos and has been on Twitter since December 2014.

Going from top to bottom, their latest tweet, at the time of writing, has 144 replies, 602 retweets and 5,237 likes, their second latest tweet has 69 replies, 712 reweets and 1,740 likes, their third latest tweet has 75 replies, 1,372 retweets and 3,522 likes, their fourth latest tweet has 2 replies, 66 retweets and 175 likes and their fifth latest tweet has 44 replies, 680 retweets and 2,656 likes. That gives you an idea of how much activity they usually get.

MOST POPULAR:

Going through Edward Snowdens last couple pages of tweets (including retweets, BTW), the one we consider the most popular, having caused a very nice 1010 direct replies at the time of writing, is this:

That looks to have caused quite a ruckus, having also had 10977 retweets and 63752 likes.

LEAST POPULAR:

What about Edward Snowdens least popular tweet as of late (including any retweets)? We reckon its this one:

That only had 2 direct replies, 66 retweets and 175 likes.

THE VERDICT:

We did a lot of of digging into Edward Snowdens Twitter activity, looking through what people were saying in response to them, their likes/retweet numbers compared to what they were before, the amount of positive/negative responses and so on. We wont bore you with the details, so our conclusion is this: we believe the online sentiment for Edward Snowden on Twitter right now is A-OK most people like them.

Well leave it there for today. Thanks for coming, and drop a comment if you disagree with me. However, we wont publish anything overly rude.

Read more:
Edward Snowden Is Doing Great On Twitter (2020-01-04) - Global Real News

10 Tech-related Trends that Shaped the Decade – businessjournaldaily.com

By Brooke Auxier, Monica Anderson and Madhu KumarPew Research Center

WASHINGTON, D.C. The tech landscape has changed dramatically over the past decade, both in the United States and around the world.

There have been notable increases in the use of social media and online platforms (including YouTube and Facebook) and technologies (like the internet, cellphones and smartphones), in some cases leading to near-saturation levels of use among major segments of the population. But digital tech also faced significant backlash in the 2010s.

Here are 10 of the top tech-related changes that Pew Research Center has studied over the past decade:

Social media sites have emerged as a go-to platform for connecting with others, finding news and engaging politically.When the Center first asked U.S. adults if they everuse a social mediasite in 2005, just 5% said they did. Today, the share is 72%, according to a survey in early 2019. Social media has also taken hold around the world. The Centers spring 2017global survey conducted in 17 advanced and 19 emerging economies found that a median of 53% of adults across emerging and developing countries use social media.

In the U.S. and around the world, younger adults are the most likely age group to use social media. For example, nine-in-ten Americans ages 18 to 29 report ever using a social media site, compared with 40% of those ages 65 and older.

In terms of specific platforms, YouTube and Facebook are the most widely used online platforms among U.S. adults, with roughly seven-in-ten Americans saying they use each site. The shares of adults who useInstagram and Snapchatare much smaller, but these platforms are especially popular with younger Americans.

Around the world and in the U.S., social media has become a key tool for activists, as well as those aligned against them.The decade began with theArab Springand ended with protesters inHong Kongand elsewhere using social media to promote and organize their causes. In some cases, governments fought back byshutting down the internet, while opponents of some activistsmounted social media campaigns of their own.

In the U.S., social media played a role in major social movements such as#MeTooand#BlackLivesMatter. For example, aPew Research Center analysisof publicly available English language tweets found that the #MeToo hashtag had been used more than 19 million times on Twitter from Oct. 15, 2017 (when actressAlyssa Milano tweetedurging victims of sexual harassment to reply me too) through Sept. 30, 2018.

Still, Americans haveexpressed mixed viewsabout the impact social media has on the broader political environment. Roughly two-thirds of Americans (64%) say the statement social media helps give a voice to underrepresented groups describes these sites very or somewhat well, a 2018 survey found. At the same time, 77% believe these platforms distract people from issues that are truly important, and 71% agree with the statement social media makes people think theyre making a difference when they really arent.

Smartphones have altered the way many Americans go online.One of the biggest digital trends of the decade has been the steady rise ofmobile connectivity. Smartphone adoption has more than doubled since the Center began surveying on this topic in 2011. Then, 35% of U.S. adults reported owning a smartphone of some kind, a share that has risen to 81% today.Teens have also become much more likely to use smartphones: More than nine-in-ten (95%) teens ages 13 to 17 report owning or having access to a smartphone, according to a2018 survey.

Adults are increasingly likely to name their smartphone as the primary way of going online. Today,37% of U.S. adults saythey mostly use a smartphone to access the internet, up from 19% in 2013.

The 2010s, meanwhile, were also the decade that saw the advent of tablet computers, which are now usedby around half(52%) of U.S. adults.

Growth in mobile and social media use has sparked debates about the impact of screen time on Americas youth and others.More than half of teens (54%) believe they spend too much time on their cellphone, while 41% say they spend too much time on social media and about one-quarter say the same about video games, a2018 surveyfound.

At the same time, about half or more of teens say they have cut back on the amount of time they spend on their cellphones (52%), and similar shares say they have tried to limit their use of social media (57%) and video games (58%).

Still, teens are not the only group who struggle with balancing their use of digital technology with other aspects of their lives. Some 36% of parents of teens say they themselves spend too much time on their cellphone, while a similar share (39%) say they at least sometimes lose focus at work because theyre checking their cellphone.

Data privacy and surveillance have become major concerns in the post-Snowden era.InJune 2013, then-National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden leaked information showing that the NSA had conducted widespread surveillance of Americans online and phone communications. In the aftermath of the revelations, about half of Americans (49%) said the release of the classified information served the public interest, while 44% said it harmed the public interest, according to a2013 survey.

In the years following the leaks, there have been high-profile commercial and governmentdata breaches, as well as revelations about how firms and governments exploit social media profiles and other data sources totarget users. Surveys have consistently shown that these issues have prompted significant public concern about peoples personal data, as well as the publics lack of confidence that companies can and will keep their data safe.

For instance, the majority of Americans now say that they feel they havevery little or no controlover the data collected about them by the government (84%), while roughly two-thirds (64%) report that they feel at least somewhat concerned about how the government is using the data it collects about them.

Tech platforms have given rise to a gig economy.Mobile technology has helped create new businesses and jobs, while at the same time sparking debate aboutregulating companiesthat provide services that can be ordered by apps.

Ride-hailing is one of the most well-documented examples of growth in thegig economy, and more Americans are using this kind of service: As offall 2018, 36% of U.S. adults said they had ever used a ride-hailing service such as Uber or Lyft, up from 15% in 2015. In addition to car services, the gig economy has spawned businesses ranging fromhome sharingto online marketplaces for homemade goods.

Online harassment has become a fairly common feature of online life, both for teens and adults.Roughly six-in-ten U.S. teens (59%) say they have been bullied or harassed online, with offensive name-calling being the most common type of harassment they have encountered, according to a2018 surveyof those ages 13 to 17. A similar share of teens (63%) view online harassment as a major problem for people their age.

Many adults also report being the target of some form of abusive behavior online. Some 41% of adults have experienced some form of online harassment, as measured in a2017 survey.

Made-up news and misinformation has sparked growing concern.The lead-up to the 2016 U.S. presidential election brought to the surfaceconcernsaround misinformation and its ability to affect the democratic process. Half of Americans believemade-up news and misinformationis a very big problem for the country today, making it a pressing problem for more Americans than said so of terrorism, illegal immigration, sexism and racism, according to a 2019 survey. Some 68% of U.S. adults say made-up news greatly impacts Americans confidence in government institutions.

The challenge of navigating the new information environment was reflected in a2018 surveythat measured the publics ability to identify five factual statements and five opinion statements. A small share of Americans were able to correctly classify all 10 statements. About a third (35%) were able to correctly identify all five opinion statements, while around a quarter (26%) were able to correctly identify all five factual statements. Americans with high political awareness, those who are very digitally savvy and those who have high levels of trust in the news media were able to more accurately identify news-related statements as factual or opinion.

A majority of Americans see gender discrimination as a problem in the tech industry.Tech companies have faced criticism for their hiring practices and work cultures, including reports of discrimination on the basis ofrace and ethnicityandgender. A majority of Americans (73%) say discrimination against women is a problem in the tech industry, with 37% citing it as a major problem, according to asummer 2017 survey.

When it comes to discrimination against black and Hispanic Americans in tech two groups that are underrepresented in the industry roughly two-thirds of Americans (68%) say this is a problem (31% say its a major problem), according to the same survey.

Americans views about tech companies have turned far less positive in recent years. Controversies related to digital privacy, made-up news, harassment and other issues may have taken their toll on public attitudes about tech companies.

The share of Americans who say these companies are having a positive effect on the way things are going in the country has declined sharply since 2015, according to aJuly 2019 survey. Four years ago, the majority of U.S. adults (71%) said these companies had a positive impact on the country, compared with 50% today.

In asurvey in summer 2018, roughly seven-in-ten Americans (72%) said it is likely that social media platforms actively censor political views that those companies find objectionable. Around half (51%) of the public said major tech companies should be regulated more than they are now.

Editors Note: Brooke Auxieris a research associate focusing on internet and technology research at Pew Research Center. Monica Andersonis an associate director of research at Pew Research Center. Madhu Kumaris a former research assistant focusing on internet and technology at Pew Research Center.

Published by The Business Journal, Youngstown, Ohio.

CLICK HERE to subscribe to our print edition and sign up to our free daily headlines.

Original post:
10 Tech-related Trends that Shaped the Decade - businessjournaldaily.com

UN official equates Chelsea Manning’s incarceration for refusing to testify to torture – WJLA

  1. UN official equates Chelsea Manning's incarceration for refusing to testify to torture  WJLA
  2. UN Letter: Chelsea Manning's Imprisonment Is Torture  The Intercept
  3. Chelsea Manning Says She Is 'Never Backing Down' in Face of US Detention Meant to Break Her  Common Dreams
  4. Chelsea Manning Responds After Top UN Official Labels Her Imprisonment 'Torture'  Gizmodo
  5. UN official equates former US intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning incarceration as torture  BreakingNews.ie
  6. View full coverage on Google News

Read the original here:
UN official equates Chelsea Manning's incarceration for refusing to testify to torture - WJLA

The Government is Torturing Chelsea Manning! Does Anyone Give a Damn? – CounterPunch

Photograph Source: Mattia Luigi Nappi CC BY 4.0

Chelsea Manning is being tortured for her refusal totestify beforea federal grand jury. She already has told a military court as a whistleblower while in the Army about documents pertaining to alleged war crimes that were committed in Iraq and Afghanistan. She has already been tortured and imprisoned for releasing that information once (Collateral Murdervideo, for example), but here in the US, the land of the free and the home of the brave, readers must be protected from reading and viewing documents about the horrors of the endless wars the US fights. Some journalists and publishers must be brought into line when disclosing information to the public about our endless wars.

War is seldom defensive these days, but rather, more about killing people deemed enemies by the government, about massive profits, and about empire.

Thinking about Mannings plight, I recall the little-known book,Fort Dix Stockade: Our Prison Camp Next Doorby Joan Crowell (1974), about how imprisonment and torture was used against those in the stockade at Fort Dix, News Jersey who protested the Vietnam War while in the military. Some accounts of Mannings first imprisonment in a Marine Corps stockade recall the treatment that recalcitrant and protesting soldiers received at the hands of their guards, some of whom were returned Vietnam veterans.Manningwas not beaten by the Marines, but her treatment amounted to torture.

Readers need only look to the masses of US citizens and immigrants, including immigrant children, locked up in the US prison system and detention camps to get the picture of the kinds of grotesque abuse that untold numbers of people suffer while incarcerated. If a nation gets away with the imprisonment and abuse of incarcerated children, just how far behind can a political system of general or selected repression be?

Heres what the UN special rapporteur on torture had to say about Mannings current treatment: an open-ended, progressively severe measure of coercion fulfilling all the constitutive elements of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (Top UN official accuses US of torturing Chelsea Manning,Guardian, December 31, 2019).

I guess iis only a certain cohort of troops and veterans that we as a nation support.

Democracy Nows New Years Day program was dedicated to the legacy of Eleanor Roosevelt First Lady of the World: Eleanor Roosevelts Impact on New Deal to U.N. Declaration of Human Rights. War destroys all human rights and freedom, Roosevelt said. Roosevelt is adamant in that position in the segments opening and knows firsthand that human rights die with the onset of war.

Where are the patriots like Roosevelt? Where are thepatriotsin the media who havepublished some of Manningsrevelations? Where are those who will stand up and do something about the torture and harassment of those who bring sunlight to the dark corners of power and the dark corners of the empire? Those at the highest levels of power dont like Manning for what she represents and does and theyve made her pay dearly.

Follow this link:
The Government is Torturing Chelsea Manning! Does Anyone Give a Damn? - CounterPunch

A Decade in Review: Top International Press Freedom Stories from the 2010s – MediaFile

In 2010, social media reporting was in its infancy, the Syrian Civil War had not yet officially begun and the President of the United States was not labeling the press as the enemy of the people. Over the past decade, new technologies, conflicts, attacks and mass movements have shifted the media landscape, providing both new opportunities for members of the media and increased threats to press freedom.

Although social media has allowed more people to participate in global reporting, the world continues to be a dangerous place for reporters. Last month, The Washington Post reported that a total of 554 journalists were killed worldwide in the past decade, some of whom were caught in crossfire or targeted in suicide bombs and shootings by gangs.

While the following is not meant to be an exhaustive list of the most consequential stories of the decade, it is meant to highlight some of the ones that provide significant insight into how the evolution of technology over the past decade has forced reporting to also evolve, how technology such as social media have been used by everyday citizens and how journalists around the world continue to face increased threats and violence.

2010- WikiLeaks

While the international nonprofit organization devoted to publishing classified media initially came on the scene in 2006, it was in 2010 that WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, brought to the forefront the question of whether publishing government documents can be justified by claims of freedom of expression and the publics right to information.

In April of that year, the platform posted a classified U.S. military video of a U.S. helicopter firing on what the military said were believed to be armed fighters in New Baghdad, Iraq. Among the 18 people killed in the attack were two Reuters journalists. Pfc. Chelsea Manning was arrested in May by the U.S. military and was charged with leaking the combat video, as well as classified State Department documents by downloading those documents to a personal computer.

In July, WikiLeaks published what it called The Afghan War Logs, which included more than 75,000 documents that revealed previously undisclosed civilian casualties caused by the U.S. and its coalition forces, details of the hunt for Osama bin Laden and accounts of increased violent action by the Taliban.

In the years since, WikiLeaks has continued to publish previously classified material from national governments around the world and, in 2016, gained increased scrutiny following its publishing of nearly 20,000 emails and 8,000 attachments from leaders of the U.S. Democratic National Committee.

Assange was eventually arrested in 2019 after seeking refuge for years at the Ecuadorian embassy in London. That year, the U.S. Justice Department unsealed an indictment dating back to March 6, 2018 that charged Assange with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion.

2011- Social Media in the Arab Spring

In December 2010, a Tunisian street vendor set himself on fire to protest the arbitrary seizing of his vegetable stand by police over failure to obtain a permit. The action sparked a pro-democracy movement that spread throughout the Middle East in 2011. The new tools offered through social media allowed demonstrators to become citizen journalists and tell their stories to the world on a scale that had never been done before.

The Arab Spring also became known to some analysts as the Facebook and Twitter Revolution. According to a 2012 study by the Pew Research Center, communities formed online were crucial in organizing a core group of activists, especially in Egypt. Additionally, a 2012 report by the United States Institute of Peace found that in the uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Bahrain, social media played an integral role in communicating to the rest of the world what was happening on the ground during the uprisings.

In addition to the role social media played in mobilizing protestors and providing news on the events to those outside the region, this new technology has also changed how people in the Middle East receive their information. The 2012 Pew study found that smaller news outlets in the region are now competing with the rise in user-generated content on social media platforms. Newspapers and radio programs have moved online in order to cater to readers who are increasingly turning to the internet for information.

2012- The Kidnapping of Austin Tice

The Syrian Civil War that began in 2011 quickly produced profound impacts on those reporting on the conflict within the country and the surrounding region, displayed notably in the 2012 disappearance of U.S. journalist Austin Tice.

In late August, The Washington Post reported that Tice, a freelance journalist who contributed stories on the civil war to The Post, McClatchy Newspapers and other publications, had been taken into Syrian government custody after weeks of speculation on his whereabouts.

Video footage of the journalist emerged in late September on a Facebook page associated with supporters of the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The video showed Tice being held by a group of masked men holding assault rifles before being pushed to his knees and filmed speaking a prayer in Arabic. According to reporting from The Post, Tice then cried out Oh Jesus, oh Jesus in English, before going back to Arabic, seconds before the footage was cut.

While the video initially appeared as though Tice was being held by Islamist militants, various journalists at the time questioned the authenticity of the video. The New York Times Editorial Board wrote that this was partly due to the fact that the captors in the video, did not behave as militants usually do.

To this day, Tice is reportedly still in Syrian custody. Tices parents, Marc and Debra Tice, have said that they are convinced he is alive and have worked for his release, traveling several times to Lebanon, putting pressure on diplomats and organizing events to keep Tices disappearance in the public eye. The F.B.I. has offered a $1 million reward for information that could lead to Tices return to the U.S. Major organizations such as Reporters Without Borders and the National Press Club continue to campaign for Tices release.

2013- The Abduction of Journalists in Syria

As international coverage on the ongoing conflict in Syria increased, journalists continued to face threats to their work and their lives. According to reporting from The New York Times, 2013 saw a sharp increase in the abduction of journalists inside Syria, making the country one of the most hostile conflict zones for news gatherers in recent memory.

Foreign journalists increasingly became targets, especially Europeans who entered Syria to cover the conflict without the permission of the Syrian government. Some journalists appeared to have been taken by armed insurgent extremist groups and criminal networks seeking ransom in cash or weapons, while others had no declared motive.

One of the journalists abducted in 2013 was Jonathan Alpeyrie, a French-American photojournalist for the Polaris agency. Islamist fighters took Alpeyrie near Damascus in April and released him nearly three months later after a $450,000 ransom was paid on his behalf.

The rebels are so desperate they dont care about their reputation abroad, Alpeyrie said in an interview published by the Paris-based Journal de la Photographie. They see guys like us as an opportunity.

2014- The Kidnapping and Murders of American Journalists Abroad

The U.S. and other western countries were again made aware of the dangers journalists face when reporting abroad with the 2014 killings of American journalists James Foley, Steven Sotloff and Luke Somers.

Foley, who disappeared in November 2012 along the Syrian border with Turkey, appeared in a video posted on YouTube by ISIS in which he pleads for his life before being beheaded by one of his captors.

A month later, a video showing the beheading of Sotloff was posted online by the Islamic State as a second message to America to halt airstrikes in Iraq. According to CNN, a masked ISIS figure appeared in the video and spoke directly to U.S. President Barack Obama, saying, Just as your missiles continue to strike our people, our knife will continue to strike the necks of your people.

In December, a U.S. mission in southern Yemen failed to rescue Somers, an American photojournalist, who was being held hostage by Al Qaeda. The hostages killed Somers, along with a South African teacher also being held, when the captors realized a rescue mission was underway. The operation was the second attempt by U.S. forces to rescue Somers.

Following these murders, Joel Simon, head of the Committee to Protect Journalists, called on the U.S. to change its ransom policy, because these journalists are going out on their own to bear witness on behalf of their audiences.

2015- The Charlie Hebdo Attack

While the 2012-2014 kidnapping and murders of international journalists provided alarming indications of the state of press freedom across the world, the 2015 attacks on the offices of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo revealed that these dangers extend beyond the Middle East.

The magazine had received criticism for its portrayal of the Prophet Mohammed in controversial cartoons dating back to 2006, with French President Jacques Chirac calling the decision to publish the images an overt provocation. After the magazine published another caricature of the prophet in 2011, its offices were destroyed in a gasoline bomb attack.

On the morning of January 7, 2015, gunmen forced their way into the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris and, according to CNN, allegedly claimed they were avenging the Prophet Mohammed and shouted Allahu akbar, which translates to God is great.

Twelve people were killed in the raids on the office, including eight Charlie Hebdo employees.

Following the attacks, the phrase Je Suis Charlie, or I am Charlie, began appearing on signs held by Parisians during vigils for the victims, eventually spreading on social media as a rallying cry in support of press freedom and freedom of expression.

2016- Fake News

While widely known as a popular phrase used by President Donald Trump to describe American media outlets, fake news better describes the flood of fabricated stories published throughout 2016, whichshowed how misinformation and propaganda became alarmingly easy to spread on social media platforms, especially when perpetrated by foriegn governments such as Russia.

One of these stories was published by a site called WTOE 5 News and falsely reported that Pope Francis had endorsed Trump in the presidential campaign. While the Pope later refuted the claim, arguing that he never comments on electoral campaigns, the story had secured 960,000 Facebook engagements, according to Buzzfeed.

Another article published by The Political Insider in August 2016 claimed that WikiLeaks founder Assange stated that Hillary Clinton and her State Department were actively arming Islamic jihadists, which includes ISIS According to CNBC, Assange had actually said that the Clinton-led State Department had approved weapon shipments to Libya during the 2011 intervention, and that those weapons had later ended up in the hands of jihadists.

A report from Buzzfeed revealed that in the three months leading up to the 2016 election, fake news stories such as these had gained nearly two million Facebook engagements. An investigation traced some of these stories back to a small town in Macedonia called Veles, where more than 140 fake news sites are based.

2017- #MeToo Spreads Across the World

In the weeks following the New York Times publishing of sexual assault allegations against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, the #MeToo Movement spread across social media globally as people shared their experiences with sexual assault or harassment. The hashtag was first posted on October 15 by American actress Alyssa Milano and by the end of that day, people in 85 countries had shared similar hashtags in languages including Arabic, Farsi, French, Hindi and Spanish..

The use of the hashtag across social media revealed the prevalence of discrimination across industries and allowed millions of people across the world to join the conversation.

The movement also brought increased scrutiny to the journalism industry itself. As reported by MediaFile in 2018, journalists in Brazil started the hashtag #DeixaElaTrabalhar (#LetHerDoHerJob) following several instances of harassment against female reporters. Additionally, more than 30 Russian news outlets announced their plans to boycott the State Dumathe lower house of the Federal Assembly of Russiain response to the exoneration of a lawmaker who had been accused by several journalists of sexual harassment.

2018- The Assassination of Jamal Khashoggi

In the last few months of 2018, the world watched as details slowly emerged surrounding the mysterious disappearance of Saudi journalist and Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

Khashoggi, who had written several stories critiquing Saudi Arabia and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salmans policies, disappeared after entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to obtain paperwork from Saudi Arabia that would allow him to marry his fiance. Early reports from the Turkish government claimed that Khashoggi was murdered inside the consulate.

Although the CIA eventually found that Mohammed bin Salman personally ordered Khashoggis murder, various world leaders and press freedom advocates across the globe expressed deep concern after U.S. President Donald Trump revealed he would not be taking strong action against Saudi Arabia.

In his last column written for The Post before his disappearance, Khashoggi called for more opportunities for those from Saudi Arabia and the surrounding region to share their stories.

The Arab world needs a modern version of the old transnational media so citizens can be informed about global events, he wrote. More important, we need to provide a platform for Arab voices.

2019- Press Freedom Continues to Experience a Global Decline

While the 2010s gave the world new and diverse sources of information in the digital media age, the decade also showed that the overall state of press freedom and the safety of journalists worldwide is facing greater threats than ever before.

A June 2019 report from Freedom House argued that global press freedom has experienced a sharp decline over the past 10 years.

The report, titled Freedom and the Media: A Downward Spiral, measured press freedom in law and practice based on standards set in the United Nations 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In addition to direct attacks against journalists, including state-sanctioned violence and imprisonment, the report found that world leaders, specifically those running some of the worlds most prominent democracies, have been using their power to alter public opinion and undermine the role of critical media outlets.

The arrests of two Reuters journalists in Myanmar and the violence faced by journalists covering the mass demonstrations in Hong Kong, as well as the verbal attacks made against the press from world leaders in the U.S., China, Hungary and other countries across the globe, all represent direct threats to journalists and their work.

Related

Link:
A Decade in Review: Top International Press Freedom Stories from the 2010s - MediaFile

Ronnie Moas and Vinny Lingham Come to Blows Over $20K Bitcoin Bet – Cointelegraph

Two well-known Bitcoin (BTC) figures have resorted to a painfully public Twitter exchange to settle an argument over a $20,000 unpaid bet.

The heated debate, which is ongoing, revolves around a pledge which investor Ronnie Moas made in 2018.

If Bitcoin was not worth $28,000 by the end of last year, Moas said he would donate the lump sum to FreeRoss.org, the charity working to free jailed former Silk Road owner, Ross Ulbricht. The bet was made with Vinny Lingham, CEO of blockchain identity startup Civic.

With BTC/USD trailing at $7,200 on Jan. 1, 2020, Lingham asked Moas to confirm he had made the payment as promised. Moas then surprised by saying he would no longer honor his commitment.

The tone swiftly became unfriendly, with Moas describing Lingham as a f*cking bastard and demanding he explain the near-total drop in the price of Civics native cryptocurrency, CVC.

I will keep my word and distribute $20,000 in 2020 to organizations highlighted at my website, he replied, explaining he would instead divide up the FreeRoss funds between up to five charities of his choosing. In an ironic twist, Moas advised Lingham:

Read my last three posts ... and the ones preceding from the last 24 hours you f*cking jackass ... stop making a fool out of yourself in a public forum.

Moas claimed he had more than a dozen reasons not to send money to FreeRoss.

Responses predictably sided with Lingham, as Moas had nonetheless reneged on the original terms of the wager.

As the argument gained traction, other Bitcoin figures, including What Bitcoin Did podcast host Peter McCormack, began pledging to replace the lost funds out of their own pocket. FreeRoss then thanked McCormack and his fellow participants, who each pledged $1,000, for their donations.

Further efforts continue to take place on the Bitcointalk forum, where users are selling collectible items.

They include an altered Venezuelan bolivar note, emblazoned with the heading Banco de Bitcoin and an image of Charlie Shrem in sunglasses. Shrem, who is now free, was also implicated in the highly controversial takedown of Silk Road by United States authorities.

Read more from the original source:
Ronnie Moas and Vinny Lingham Come to Blows Over $20K Bitcoin Bet - Cointelegraph

Why Analysts Think Bitcoins Surge to $7,450 is Just the Beginning – newsBTC

Over the past few hours, Bitcoin (BTC) has begun to gain momentum once again, pushing past $7,400 after remaining trapped under that level for the past two-odd days. As of the time of writing this, the leading cryptocurrency is trading for $7,470 registering a 2.22% gain in the past 24 hours. Altcoins have followed suit, posting similar slight gains across the board as bulls are stepping in.

Although already a strong performance, analysts expect Bitcoins gains to continue into next week, with some even going as far as to say that the cryptocurrency could top $9,000 by the end of the month, maybe sooner.

Cryptocurrency and forex trader Livercoin posted the below tweet on Saturday, showing that he believes Bitcoin has been trading like a textbook Wyckoff Reaccumulation-esque pattern over the past few days.

The textbook pattern, should BTC follow it to a T, suggests that BTC will break higher and higher in the coming days, in an upward move that will bring the asset back to the high-$7,000s.

Another analyst echoed this optimism, posting the below chart. In it, he notes that if BTC can break the neckline of the inverse head and shoulders pattern formed over the past five weeks, which it did, a 15% move to hit $8,500 could be had in the coming weeks.

Seeing that Bitcoin has broken past the neckline over the past few hours and may see an end-to-end Ichimoku Cloud move, the cryptocurrency could begin to act on this pattern, surging higher to the aforementioned target.

Also, Su Zhu, the chief executive officer of forex and crypto fund Three Arrows Capital,recently remarked on Twitter that he believes Bitcoins price outlooking heading into 2020 is looking rather bullish. The prominent commentator specifically cited his analysis of the BTC/USDT trading pairs and their premiums to BTC/USD markets and the overall price action, which shows there are clear signs of accumulation and money flow back into risk.

Original post:
Why Analysts Think Bitcoins Surge to $7,450 is Just the Beginning - newsBTC

Bitcoin is on the Cusp of a Major Price Movement – Crypto Briefing

Bitcoin struggles to move out of the consolidation phase that began in late November 2019. Heres what it would take to trigger a BTC breakout.

After peaking at nearly $14,000 in June 2019, Bitcoin went through a corrective period that saw its price drop over 50%. The significant selling pressure took BTC down to the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level where it has been hovering over the past two months. This Fibonacci retracement area is considered by many traders as the golden retracement zone due to the high probability of a rebound.

Yet, the buying pressure behind the pioneer cryptocurrency must increase to allow it to bounce off the current price levels. If volume indeed picks up, then Bitcoin could have the potential to surge to the 50% Fibonacci retracement zone that sits at $8,500.

Conversely, an increase in supply could push BTC below the golden retracement zone. Such a bearish impulse could trigger a major sell-off sending this crypto down to the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level, around $5,500.

BTC/USD by TradingView

The ambiguous outlook that Bitcoin presents is also perceivable on its 1-day chart. Under this time frame, BTC can be seen trading between the lower and upper Bollinger bands since the beginning of December 2019. The low levels of volatility made the bands squeeze, which indicates that a period of high volatility is underway.

Due to the inability to determine which direction the flagship cryptocurrency will breakout, the current trading range between $6,880 and $7,660 is a reasonable no-trade zone.

A daily candlestick close below the $6,880 support level would likely be followed by a move down to the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level. However, breaking above the $7,660 resistance level could take BTC to the 50% Fibonacci retracement level.

BTC/USD by TradingView

The market sentiment around Bitcoin is in fear, according to the Crypto Fear and Greed Index. As BTC continues to hover around $7,000, investors worry it could test lower lows extending the bearish trend it entered in June 2019. Based on the previous technical analysis, such a bearish perspective is extremely feasible. However, it remains to be seen whether the support or the resistance level will break first, which will determine the direction of the overall trend.

Originally posted here:
Bitcoin is on the Cusp of a Major Price Movement - Crypto Briefing

New crisis in the Middle East: Good for bitcoin, bad for the world – Decrypt

At approximately 02.30 GMT today a US drone strike killed senior Iranian military leader Qasem Soleimani at Baghdads international airport. The event triggered a dramatic escalation in tensions in the region, with oil prices surging on the news. Bitcoin was not far behind; bouncing back from under $7k, the cryptocurrencys price proceeded to jump over six percent within hours of the attack.

But while a surge in bitcoins price would normally be an occasion for celebration among bitcoin maximalists, todays news met with a muted response on crypto twitter, and even denial. If the unwelcome prospect of another war in the Middle East is the price of bitcoins success, is it one crypto enthusiasts are willing to pay?

Political instability is often seen as a bellwether of crypto price, although economic stability remains the most important factor; the viability of bitcoin as a safe haven in the face of catastrophe is a common argument.

Today, it was given some credence. Gold prices climbed to a four-month high. Oil, meanwhile, shot up over 4 percent amid concerns of disruption to supplies.

There's a clear flight to safety among traditional assets with stocks declining (about 1.5%) across the globe and safe havens like gold and the Japanese Yen have seen minor gains as well, wrote crypto analyst Mati Greenspan in his daily newsletter Quantum Economics.

The surge in crude oil is to be expected, the surge in bitcoin is a total surprise, he added.

The blue line represents the price of crude oil, which reacted quickly to this morning's news, contrasted with BTC across various exchanges. IMAGE: Mati Greenspan.

Nevertheless, some doubted that the strike, and the political instability it unleashed, bore any responsibility for the surge.

Bitcoin maximalist and talk show host Peter McCormack quickly decried US President Donald Trumps action.

Others saw the rally as short lived, before business as usualor an overblown reaction. Yet the threat of war is very real.

The Pentagon had accused Major-General Soleimani, Irans highest ranking military official, of orchestrating attacks on US forces in Iraq, and says it acted in self defence.

Iran, meanwhile, has vowed to take action in response. US citizens have been told to leave Iraq, US military bases are on high alert and officials in the region told the Financial Times that they were braced for Iranian retaliation across the Middle East. From Israel to Saudi Arabia and even India and Pakistan, the entire region is on high alert.

"Certainly Iran is going to retaliate in some way. Theyre not going to confront the US directly but they will perhaps attack Saudi tankers again, maybe Saudi oil refineries," John Tirman, executive director at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for International Studies, told Al Jazeera.

Part of bitcoins appeal is that, up to now, it has been uncorrelated to other, non-crypto safe haven assets such as gold, Matthew Graham, chief executive of Beijing-based Sino Global Capital, told Decrypt.

This history is not consistent with being a safe haven for geopolitical risk, he said. However, in our view, as bitcoin matures, its correlation with other assets is likely to increase. As part of this process, geopolitical and macroeconomic factors are likely to have increasing influence on bitcoins price.

He added that for similar reasons, in the long-term, bitcoin is likely to become more positively correlated with the price of gold, and there is already evidencesome in the past 24 hoursfor this view.

Following this logic, some speculated that Iranians could be buying up Bitcoin to counter the prospect of further sanctions. Others even suggested that the rising price could be due to cryptotraders speculating that Iranians are buying bitcoin.

Its clear that many crypto traders are closely watching events in Iran, Graham told Decrypt. In our view, its possible that this geopolitical risk factor impacted bitcoins price in combination with other factors, including a short squeeze. Overall, its important to not overstate the case, he added.

Greenspan held a similar view: The Iranian market in and of itself is likely too small and slow to have caused this move single-handedly. More likely, one or several players have been waiting on the side for a good buying opportunity below $7,000 per coin and it seems one has presented itself, he wrote.

There may be further cause for concern. Bitcoin itself is a concern for the US, as far as Iran is concerned

Almost a year ago, the New York Times reported that bitcoin is helping Iran to undermine US sanctions. These have cost Iran $200 billion in foreign-exchange income and investment, the countrys President Hassan Rouhani said on Tuesday.

Iran is moving to regulate Bitcoin, and mining was reportedly legalized in the country in August. Iran has also dangled the prospect of a national cryptocurrency over the world since February 2018. In December, Rouhani called on Islamic countries to create a Muslim cryptocurrency to fight US economic dominance.

But in the short term, as tensions escalate in the Middle East once again, bitcoin looks set to play its partwhether for sanctions busting or as a foil for speculation. And conflict could combine with global recession to increase the demand for bitcoin, gold and oil alike.

The good news? Even bitcoin maximalists are in tune with the old Edwin Starr hit:

War, huh, good god. What is it good for? Absolutely nothing.

Lets hope we dont get to find out whether that applies to bitcoin anytime soon.

Read the rest here:
New crisis in the Middle East: Good for bitcoin, bad for the world - Decrypt

Why 2020 will be the best year yet for Bitcoins Lightning Network – Decrypt

For Bitcoins scaling solution, the Lightning Network, 2019 passed in a flash of innovation.

Developers made major progress in enabling large sums to be transferred across the network; the first neutrino mobile wallet was launched; the first Lightning conference opened; the first major exchange integration went live, and more. Huge milestones, as Ryan Gentry, lead analyst at crypto investment firm MultiCoin Capital, told Decrypt.

But for Lightning, a super-fast payments layer on top of the Bitcoin blockchain that allows users to send and receive bitcoin quickly and cheaply, 2020 promises plenty more thrills, and perhaps some spills too.

This is a very exciting time for Lightning, said Samson Mow, chief strategy officer at Canadian blockchain services provider Blockstream. For 2020, I expect to see continued growth of the network and further privacy improvements as well.

Payments on the Lightning Network are becoming easier, with developers anticipating further progress with multi-path payments. These allow for multiple channels to be used together in concert, meaning that payments can be split into smaller chunks. That, in turn, means that large amounts of bitcoin can be sent both quickly and cheaply.

But multi-path payments arent the only option being worked on.

Roy Sheinfeld, co-founder of bitcoin wallet and payment services provider Breez, said that the startup is working on asynchronous payments via Lightning Rod, a new offline-style payments protocol that will enable users to make payments without the need for mobile nodes to be online at the same time.

Channel capacity is also set to increase, he predicted. So-called Wumbo channels are in the works. These would not only remove the current 0.167 BTC channel limit, but leave payment participants free to set it as high as they wish.

Another upcoming innovation to look out for is Trampoline routing. This should enable clients to simplify their network transactions by relying on a so-called trampoline node to relay payments, instead of having to do it manually.

Well also see more exchanges jumping on board. Bitfinex just added support for the Bitcoin Lightning Network, and Bitfinex wallets can now send and receive bitcoin using Lightning.

In February, Twitter and Square CEO Jack Dorsey announced that Squares Cash App will integrate Lightning capabilities sometime in the future. Dorsey is a high profile Bitcoin cheerleader as well as an investor in Lightning; hes recently doubled down by funding the development of Lightning.

In the same month, Jeremy Welch, the chief executive of Casa, which provides Bitcoin multisig key security and Lightning nodes, told Decrypt that Dorseys support for Lightning via Square would simply be huge.

Messaging functionality is in the works, too. A peer-to-peer, instant messaging protocol, Whatsata portmanteau of WhatsApp and satoshiwas created for Lightning in November. It enables encrypted messages to be sent without the use of a third party, like Facebook or WhatsApp. For the time being, its free; implementing a low-cost version is the main challenge.

Theres even a Lightning ATM in development that will allow you to convert all your spare change to satoshi.

All that progress comes at a price, however.

For 2020, I'm anticipating tension between those on the network that want to onboard millions of users now, and those that want to go slow and prioritize user privacy first, said Ryan Gentry, lead analyst at crypto investment firm MultiCoin Capital.

Gentry questions whether the networks liquidity management tools are currently robust enough to handle a sudden influx of payments. It will be very interesting to see how the network holds up if a game like Litenite or Raiki goes viral, he said.

We have to check that the network can scale, that the clients can scale, admitted Sheinfeld.

Be the first to get Decrypt Members. A new type of account built on blockchain.

With Breez, Sheinfelds ultimate aim is to improve Lightnings UX. We want to obfuscate complexity, and make it a seamless experience, like with the Internet, he said. Lightning service providers, he believes, will play a leading role in onboarding users, performing a similar function to Internet Service Provider (ISPs).

If we want to provide UX thats on a par with fiat, were not there yet, but I think well be there in six to 12 months.

If the Lightning networks going to achieve mass adoption, it has some hurdles to overcome, thenbut its going flat-out. In the meantime, why not help things along by building your own Lightning node.

Read the rest here:
Why 2020 will be the best year yet for Bitcoins Lightning Network - Decrypt