Why CDOs should care about ML and the human connection – CDOTrends

As an enormous decade comes to an end, digital officers are now looking to the future. The last ten years saw a boom in technology that created a digital shift in almost every industry. At no point, however, has this transformation been enough to replace human connection. Which begs the question: will it ever?

The short answer is no. However, digital officers must continually strategize to bridge the gap between machine learning and human connectivity.

The rise of ML and AI in the workplace

We are entering an era that is dominated by artificial intelligence technologies, enabling workers to not only work remotely but collaborate remotely too. Being able to work from home is hardly new, but the ability to collaborate and engage with colleagues as though you are face-to-face is the result of evolving visual and audio technology.

So why should the digital officer care? Because this technology links the growing need for remote working, collaboration, and unwavering employee engagement.

Empathy in business

In the age of digital transformation, businesses need to prioritize empathy because working with people still requires a human element.

When it comes to creating an empathetic workplace, visibility is essential. This means visibility among employees, managers, and business directors, regardless of location.

The reason for this is simple: visibility translates to availability; the more visible, the more accessible someone is.

Accessibility and availability work together to drive an empathetic workplace environment. This is critical when considering how to engage and retain employees, particularly as digital officers look to transform business operations.

While digital transformation may allow a business to automate some tasks, it can also create a more connected environment that fosters team collaboration. Digital transformation no longer translates to robots taking over human roles and responsibilities; rather, it's an opportunity to fuse machine learning with human capabilities.

Empathy and AI

In the discussion of empathy and AI, employee experience must remain high on the agenda. Technology and AI are already being used when empathically engaging with customers, but what about employee engagement? Just as a digital officer would recommend a business interact with its customers online, business directors must implement the appropriate technology to communicate with employees regardless of location or time zone.

Keeping pace

Voice assistant technology has grown in popularity and will continue to advance via the mass amounts of data being created. Again, empathy will be integral to the success and uptake of this technology. Similarly, video and audio technology will also excel, and businesses will need to keep pace with rapid adoption.

The role of the digital officer will be to assist businesses in driving their own digital transformation strategy, utilizing the latest technology to meet evolving business objectives both internally and externally and, ultimately, positively impact the bottom line.

Holger Reisinger, senior vice president for Large Enterprise at Jabra, wrote this article.The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CDOTrends.Photo credit: iStockphoto/wildpixel

Original post:
Why CDOs should care about ML and the human connection - CDOTrends

5 Major Bitcoin Trends To Watch In 2020 – Forbes

Getty

2019 was a positive year for the Bitcoin price, with the crypto assets valuation roughly doubling itself over the course of twelve months. Although Bitcoin declined heavily over the second half of 2019, it has started off 2020 with a bang.

So, whats to be expected in 2020? Here are five major trends to watch for in Bitcoin this year.

The Bitcoin halving coming up in May is a key aspect of the bull case for Bitcoin in 2020. This is a scheduled occurrence that takes place roughly every four years where the number of new Bitcoin generated around every ten minutes is cut in half. Instead of 12.5 Bitcoin being included as a subsidy for miners in every block, 6.25 Bitcoin will now be generated instead.

Opinions are split in terms of thoughts on how this event will affect the Bitcoin price and whether its already priced into the market. Either way, it should be noted that the only two previous halvings in Bitcoins history led to significant appreciations in the crypto assets price in the months that followed.

The excitement around The Halveninig led to one industry executive to predict a $50,000 Bitcoin price by the end of 2020.

Bitcoin has been referred to as digital gold for a number of years, but 2019 was the year when that meme became much more realistic, according to data from the last six months of the year. In fact, the idea of Bitcoin as digital gold became so prevalent in 2019 that U.S. Congressman Brad Sherman (D-CA) claimed the crypto asset may be a threat to the U.S. dollars dominance in the global economy.

At the start of 2020, the similarities between Bitcoins and golds price movements around increased tensions between the United States and Iran did not no unnoticed. However, longer-term measurements of the correlation between Bitcoin and gold still indicate there is a very weak correlation between these two assets.

The digital gold use case is often referred to as Bitcoins core value proposition, so a closer correlation with physical gold could indicate a greater level of understanding and acceptance of this point from market participants. Additionally, the introduction of central bank-issued digital currencies could clarify the value proposition of something like Bitcoin in the minds of the general public.

Unlike some of the smaller cryptocurrencies out there, Bitcoin does not see serious upgrades happen very often (and for good reason). That said, a major change could take place in 2020.

Schnorr, Taproot, and Tapscript are all expected to be included in the same soft-forking upgrade of the Bitcoin network. A finalized proposal for the activation of these improvements by Bitcoin nodes could be ready as early as this year. Currently, developers are reviewing code related to these potential changes, which are expected to improve privacy, smart contract functionality, and general scalability of the Bitcoin network.

Developments are also taking place on layers above the base Bitcoin protocol. The Lightning Network has been hyped as a solution for faster, cheaper Bitcoin micropayments for a number of years now, and Blockstreams Liquid sidechain has seen growth in terms of the amount of Bitcoin and Tether US available on the platform over the past few months.

Although the Lightning Network has enjoyed a greater level of attention up to this point, it may be Liquid that takes the spotlight in 2020. Due to the large amount of centralization of Bitcoin transactions around exchanges, Liquid could be helpful in lowering congestion on the base Bitcoin blockchain in a situation where there is a large amount of speculation around the Bitcoin price, possibly due to the halving.

In a scenario where demand for block space stays relatively stagnant, its possible that neither of these secondary Bitcoin protocol layers will see much growth this year, as the incentive to change old habits is much weaker.

There is a belief among many Bitcoin technologists that innovations like sidechains and the Lightning Network will eventually send the price of alternative crypto assets to zero. Notably, the altcoin market as a whole is down quite substantially against Bitcoin over the past two years.

And, of course, the final Bitcoin trend to watch in 2020 is adoption by institutional investors. Adoption from institutions has been hyped for many years, but this is not something that happens overnight.

2019 saw the SEC approval of the first 40 Act-regulated Bitcoin fund, which has led one analyst to believe that a Bitcoin ETF approval could be right around the corner. Additionally, Grayscale recently announced inflows of $600 million in new money from investors, mostly from hedge funds. Last week, a survey also found that that financial advisors may be increasing the exposure of their clients assets to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies this year.

Link:
5 Major Bitcoin Trends To Watch In 2020 - Forbes

Sunday Digest: Bitcoin Price, BSV Pump and Dump, and Other News – Bitcoinist

Today is the day when Orthodox Christians submerge themselves in icy water to mark Epiphany, celebrating the baptism of Jesus in the River Jordan.

Personally I prefer to celebrate my Bitcoin epiphany with a couple of icy beers, but you know, each to their own.

If last week, bitcoin price was all about $8k, then this week was all about $9k. Or to be more specific, would we get there?

Certainly, at the start of the week, the sentiment seemed to have turned bullish. $8k holding throughout the weekend raised hopes of a repeat of last years rally.

After a quiet Monday, the price started to pump on Tuesday, perhaps due to a mass liquidation of short positions on BitMex. From $8.1k bitcoin shot up, pausing briefly at resistance around $8.6k before finally topping out at around $8.8k.

And there it stayed for the rest of the week, trading in a range from $8.6k to tantalizingly close to $9k. It was looking as though $9k would have to wait, but then a spurt this morning saw $9k fall, and eyes move on to the psychologically significant $10k level.

The three competing theories on future bitcoin price models all point in the same direction, albeit at different rates. And a conservative analysis of the level of the next all-time high (ATH) came in at around $75k $85k.

This means that, as usual, anything can happen. Lets see if we can make it through January and keep hold of the months gains so far, for starters.

Bitcoin SV had a notable week to compound its already impressive January gains. Craig Wright and Calvin Ayre have been promising something big for the coin for the past few months.

Still no word on what that might be, although the price has pumped on the anticipation, with BSV flippening Binance Coin (BNB) early in the week. This brought great joy to SV supporters as Binance CEO, CZ, led the delisting of SV when Craig Wright got out his lawsuit hammer, last spring.

But BSV wasnt done there. Price doubled overnight, to see the token flippen its arch-rival, Bitcoin Cash (BCH). Of course, what goes up and all that.

Crypto Twitter was circling SV like a vulture, waiting for the epic crash it sensed coming. It didnt have to wait long. SV started dumping hard, with the previous pump labeled wash trading, something which is actually easier when delisted from major exchanges.

On Tuesday we published an article suggesting that there may finally be some movement on Russias long-debated crypto-legislation. It wasnt the first time that officials have made such claims.

However, it was the first time that such claims were followed two days later by news that the entire Russian government had resigned.

So would the new Prime Minister be likely to expedite crypto legislation? At this stage, its impossible to be sure.

Chinas Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) may not be the done deal we have been led to believe. Whilst it is supposedly now ready for limited geographical testing, an ex-governor of the Peoples Bank of China has suggested that current blockchain technology is not efficient or scalable enough.

Meanwhile, it was announced that the Reserve Bank of Australia is trialing its own simulated CBDC in a wholesale payment system.

According to reports, Ripple spent around $170,000 lobbying US lawmakers in 2019 in an attempt to influence crypto regulation. But if you think thats a lot, it spent a massive $450,000 in 2018, with a similar lack of solid results.

According to a survey, over a third of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the US now accept payment for goods and services in cryptocurrency.

It must be to cater for all the actual Nazis who are using bitcoin, according to certain US government officials.

What was your favorite bitcoin and crypto news story of the week?Let us know in the comments below!

Image via Shutterstock

View post:
Sunday Digest: Bitcoin Price, BSV Pump and Dump, and Other News - Bitcoinist

Bitcoin Hash Rate Hit a New ATH, And Its Crucial Leading Up to Halving – newsBTC

The Bitcoin network hash rate has reached an all-time high at 126 quintillion hashes per second. By comparison, this time last year, the network was hashing at just 38 quintillion hashes per second.

However, of more considerable significance is what this indicates. And that is a trend towards increasing miner confidence. As such, concerns over miner capitulation, in the run-up to the halving, show few signs of credibility.

Bitcoin hash rate over 2 year period. (Source: bitinfocharts.com)

Following Bitcoins stellar form of late, news of the networks hash rate reaching another all-time high should come as no surprise.

Over the weekend, the average daily hash rate peaked at 126 quintillion hashes per second. Putting paid to any notion that miners are cautious about the coming halving this May.

Hash rate is a term that refers to processing power on the network. As Bitcoins get mined, transactions need to be hashed before being added on to the blockchain ledger.

Every one of these hashes is created by successfully completing a complex mathematical puzzle.

The hash rate is a measure of how many times the network can attempt to complete this puzzle every second.

And so, a high hash rate indicates good network health, as well as being a metric of how secure the network is. This is because hackers would struggle to control more than half of the Bitcoin network, to perform a 51% attack, when the hash rate is so high.

With that, as more miners compete to complete blocks, mining difficulty increases. And to stay profitable, only those with access to cheap electricity and the most efficient mining equipment can afford to stay in the game.

Bitcoin is designed to evaluate and adjust the difficulty of mining every 2,016 blocks, or roughly every two weeks.

At this moment, mining Bitcoin is as difficult as its ever been, at 14.78T. In fact, since the start of 2020, mining difficulty on the Bitcoin network jumped 13%.

Bitcoin mining difficult. (Source: blockchain.info)

Add into the mix the coming halving, when miners will receive half the reward (6.25 BTC) for completing a block, the rational expectation is for a mass exodus of miners.

However, the trend towards higher and higher hash rates, suggests that more miners are joining the Bitcoin network, and this doesnt look like a scenario that will play out.

Why is this? After all, if mining profitability gets cut in half this May, why do miners continue to prop up the network, and in greater numbers?

Should the Bitcoin price fail to gain any significant traction after the halving, Bitcoin mining, at current rates, would be unsustainable in the short term.

This can only mean that miners are expecting a significant upswing in the Bitcoin price. Whether that will happen or not is anyones guess. But based on increasing hash rates, its clear that miners believe so.

Original post:
Bitcoin Hash Rate Hit a New ATH, And Its Crucial Leading Up to Halving - newsBTC

Bitcoin [BTC] Price Action Recalls the Bears, as Bounce above $8,500 Keeps them at Bay – Coingape

Bitcoin [BTC] eminent pull-back seems to have finally occurred and the whales seems to have timed a large shake-shout of long orders. The Price Action (PA) logs one of the longest spinning tops on the daily with the high at $9,188 and low at $8,480.

As reported earlier this morning, the break above the 200-DMA was a strong positive signal. However, the long orders seems to have been squeezed by the whales with a strong rejection.

Datamish reports over $110 million shorts liquidation in the last six hours. Moreover, the shorts liquidated with the break above $9,180 were only about $20 million in size.

Now, price seems to have found support above the 50-Period moving average on the 4-hour chart. Hence, the flash move could be a blip in the a long term scale, if the trend picks up again.

According to derivatives and crypto trader, Zoran Kole. his trading systems still protects the bullish outlook in the long term. He tweeted,

Imo, it looks like a shakeout and not trend reversal. Invalidation below 84xx

Trader Josh Rager also expressed similar sentiments as he continues to stick to his bullish bias. Rager tweeted,

$BTC pullbacks should be expected The important thing to keep an eye on is the market structure and the trend change. Price would likely bounce at low $8ks Unless price made its way down past $7700, I wouldnt worry

However, the short interest in the market seems to be growing with funding rates on futures and derivatives exchange going negative on most exchanges. Traders will be looking to protect the swing above $7500-$7800 for a complete reversal in the trend.

The CME futures market opening is due in the next three hours. As it stands now it is going to open with a bearish gap of around $300 as the closing on price was $8,925.

The volatility and uncertainty in the trend is expected to continue as traders look for gap filling, while bears will seek to watch levels around $8200.

Do you think the pullback was temporary or the bears will take control? Please share your views with.

Summary

Article Name

Bitcoin [BTC] Price Action Recalls the Bears, as Bounce above $8,500 Keeps them at Bay

Description

Bitcoin [BTC] eminent pull-back seems to have finally occurred and the whales seems to have timed a large shake-shout of long orders. The Price Action (PA) logs one of the longest spinning tops on the daily with the high at $9,188 and low at $8,480.

Author

Nivesh Rustgi

Publisher Name

CoinGape

Publisher Logo

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on Linkedin

Share on Telegram

Read more here:
Bitcoin [BTC] Price Action Recalls the Bears, as Bounce above $8,500 Keeps them at Bay - Coingape

IDC identifies Hamas bitcoin front with Iran links – report – The Jerusalem Post

IDCs International Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT) has identified a bitcoin front for Hamas which has links to Iran in a report exclusively obtained by The Jerusalem Post.According to the IDC-ICT Cyber desk report, the al-Nasr Brigades Lawa al-Tawahid serve as the military arm of the Popular Resistance Committees, was formed in 2001 by Jamal Abu Samhadna Abu Atayya and operates under the auspices of Hamas.The report also says that the brigades have been funded by Iran in the past, but appear to be low on Iranian funds in the present, leading to the new bitcoin fund-raising initiative.In addition, the organization is known for its kidnapping operation of Gilad Schalit.In the ICT report, the Hamas and Iran-linked groups network of online media platforms is deciphered as well as how they all interact to raise funds for the group.A website called cash4ps enables Hamas to send and receive money out of Gaza for operational terror purposes while simultaneously providing a measure of anonymity to either donors or beneficiaries of the funds, said the report.While monitoring Bitcoin address 1LaNXgq2ctDEa4fTha6PTo8sucqzieQctq, ICTs cyber desk noted an irregular increase in the scope of activity, and a deeper review showed that the same address served a seemingly legitimate financial website by the name of cash4ps.It added that the company connected to the bitcoin address in question has been identified as operating an account in a banned bank.A check with BitcoinWhosWho.com did not reveal any fraud alert associated with the wallet, yet the report said that the Bitcoin Abuse Database website flagged the wallet as a fund-raising wallet for Hamas, the report stated.The Islamic National Bank, which the US gave a terrorist designation in 2010 due to its connection to Hamas, is linked to the financial scheme.The bank has a physical presence in the form of a few branches and ATMs across Gaza in addition to an internet presence under http://www.inb.ps where it offers banking services to Gazans, said the report.On November 28th, the bank opened a new Facebook page which refers to websites associated with the financial scheme in addition to promoting its services and advertising savings accounts. Additionally, the bank refers to a app that can be downloaded on both Android and iOS.Reviewing Facebook posts, ICT was able to connect the wallet with al-Buraq media, which identifies with al-Nasr Brigades and included an appeal for support due to lack of resources and Irans rejection to their request for support in the current time period.ICT also collaborated with Cobweb Technologies to uncover connections between certain Telegram accounts and the terror financing scheme.An ICT inspection on December 1 revealed that the total transaction volume in the wallet in question has reached 3,370 Bitcoin ($23,800,524.) In four years, the wallet has performed more than 4,5000 transactions.Further, the report explained that the company connected to the wallet has two physical addresses in Gaza: (i) in A Rimal neighborhood across from a mosque and (ii) Rafah Balad next to the civil defense office (possibly on the Egyptian side).Moreover, ICT identified Ramadan Alkurd, a.k.a. Wesam Ismael, as connected to the fund-raising operations and has connected him with Hamas.There is a picture online of Alkurd in a Hamas-style uniform and another picture of him making a pro-Hamas sign with his hands. There is additional evidence linking Wesam Ismael to Hamas and proving that the two names are the same person using alter egos.A spokesman for ICT said Hamass use of the wallet for terror financing might be disrupted if the US designated all of the mentioned accounts and entities as connected to terror groups.While that would be a start, the spokesman noted that the West and other countries wanting to blot out terror financing should pass international legislation regulating the bitcoin exchanges.Only with additional regulation, which bitcoin has worked hard to avoid to date, can these nations force bitcoin managers to carry out sufficient due diligence to eliminate their being used as platforms for terror financing.The ICT reports authors included Dr. Eitan Azani, Dr. Michael Barak, Edan Landau and Nadine Liv.

More:
IDC identifies Hamas bitcoin front with Iran links - report - The Jerusalem Post

Bitcoin Is Plunging, But Its Too Early To Say Bulls Have Given Up – newsBTC

Bitcoin failed to extend gains above $9,200 and started a downside correction against the US Dollar. BTC price tested the $8,500 support and it could bounce back.

Yesterday, we discussed a crucial breakout pattern in bitcoin above $8,500 on the daily chart against the US Dollar. BTC price extended gains above $9,000, but it struggled to clear the main $9,200 and $9,300 resistance levels (as pointed out yesterday).

A new 2020 high was formed near $9,186 before the price started a sharp decline. There was a break below the $9,000 and $8,800 support levels. Besides, there was a break below a major ascending channel with support near $8,830 on the hourly chart of the BTC/USD pair.

Bitcoin Price

It opened the doors for more losses below the $8,800 support and the 100 hourly simple moving average. Finally, bitcoin tested the key $8,500 support area, where the bulls took a stand.

A low is formed near $8,473 and the price is currently recovering. It traded above the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the recent slide from the $9,186 high to $8,473 low.

On the downside, the main uptrend support is near the $8,500 level. If there is a downside break below the $8,500 support, the price could extend its correction towards the $8,000 pivot level. Any further losses below $8,000 might start a downtrend in the near term.

If BTC price stays above the $8,500 support, it is likely to start a fresh increase. The first key resistance is near the $8,800 area and the 100 hourly simple moving average.

Additionally, the 50% Fib retracement level of the recent slide from the $9,186 high to $8,473 low is also near the $8,830 level. Therefore, bitcoin must surpass the $8,880 area to resume is uptrend towards $9,200 and $9,500 in the coming days.

Technical indicators:

Hourly MACD The MACD is losing momentum in the bearish zone and turning bullish.

Hourly RSI (Relative Strength Index) The RSI for BTC/USD is currently near 40 and struggling to rise towards 50.

Major Support Levels $8,500 followed by $8,000.

Major Resistance Levels $8,800, $8,830 and $9,200.

Here is the original post:
Bitcoin Is Plunging, But Its Too Early To Say Bulls Have Given Up - newsBTC

2 Reasons Why Bitcoins 22% YTD Performance Is the Start of Something Massive – newsBTC

Bitcoinis up more than 22% to almost $9,000 in the first 15 days of 2020, the coins best start of the year surge since 2012. With institutional interest gaining traction, and adoption and name recognition on the rise, this decade looks promising for the leading cryptocurrency.

Several factors are fueling Bitcoins bullish run. Global trading company CME Group launched options tied to Bitcoin futures this week, establishing a new vehicle for institutional investors to buy in to the digital currency.

Further, a survey of financial advisors showed that a higher proportion expect to allocate to digital currencies in 2020 than in the past. And 64% of advisors expect the price of Bitcoin to appreciate over the next five years, up from 55% of advisors in last years survey

I think youre going to see greater mainstream adoption, Michael Conn, managing partner at Quail Creek Ventures, told The Wall Street Journal. You can see this happening already with Fidelity and other institutional players moving into the space.

Others, like Jeffrey Gundlach, CEO and CIO at DoubleLine Capital, recommended investors pile into Bitcoin in 2019 before its 95% surge through the year. He recentlydoubled-down and stated that he thinks the coin could nearly double its value by year-end:

I think bitcoins going to go higher in the near term. I think it could go as high as $15,000 in 2020, Gundlach said on his podcast last week.

Bitcoin investors are also hoping on the coins halving will lead to higher prices. The event is set to occur on May 12 and cut the amount of BTC awarded for blockchain mining in half. As the drop in coin reward goes from 12.5 coins to 6.25, the reduced supply entering the market from miners is likely to cause the price of the asset to rise.

Yesterday NewsBTC reported that Fidelity Digital Assets (FDAS) the cryptocurrency-centric arm of investment firm Fidelity has entered a partnership with a London-based crypto asset firm Nickel Digital Asset management.

In a bullish move to expose digital assets to institutional investors in Europe, the partnership is designed to help address the lack of back-office services such as custody of cryptocurrencies among major financial providers.

Following Bitcoins run, smaller digital currencies like ETH and XRP are also up, gaining 25% and 20%, respectively, this month.

Bitcoin was trading at $8,750 per coin at the time of publication.

Continue reading here:
2 Reasons Why Bitcoins 22% YTD Performance Is the Start of Something Massive - newsBTC

Why Americansand the WorldOught to Be Concerned About Julian Assange’s Extradition Case – Common Dreams

On Monday January 13, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange appeared at Westminster Magistrates Court in his fight against extradition to the US. The administrative hearing concerned Assanges lack of access to legal counsel, making it difficult for him to adequately prepare for his case. His lawyer, Gareth Peirce, told the Judge that UK prison is blocking her client from reviewing key evidence. She has only had 2 hours with him since last hearing in December.

Travesty of injustice is woven into the UK legal system itself. This procedural hearing, which was originally scheduled on Tuesday, was moved earlier by a day at the last minute. This gave Assanges defense team only 1 hour with him rather than the full day they had expected.

Assange has been charged with 17 counts of espionage for publishing the governments documents exposing US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan and torture in Guantanamo Bay. The indictment of Assange is recognized by many free speech groups as the most important press freedom case of our time. Yet, with mainstream media blackout and utter silence of political leaders on this important issue, criminalization of journalism goes on without much of the public being aware of it.

Americas betrayal of its ideals

What is this prosecution of Assange really about? Why do Americans need to be concerned about this Australian journalist who is charged with violating the Espionage Act by our government? WikiLeaks has radically changed the media landscape. By publishing truthful information about the United States, the organization came head-to-head with the Pentagon and the CIA. Yet, effectiveness of his fearless journalism is not the only reason Assange became a political prisoner; designated as an enemy of the state and psychologically tortured inside Belmarsh prison (once known as the UKs Guantanamo Bay).

"WikiLeaks has radically changed the media landscape. By publishing truthful information about the United States, the organization came head-to-head with the Pentagon and the CIA. Yet, effectiveness of his fearless journalism is not the only reason Assange became a political prisoner."

WikiLeaks 2010 publication of the Collateral Murder video shed light on a hidden history of the United States. Raw footage of a US Army attack in the suburb of Iraq, carried out under the banner of Operation Iraqi Freedom recovered lost pages of history. The unfolding imagery seen from the view of an Apache helicopter reached back to a time before the invasion of Iraq, before 9/11, and even before the nations addiction to oil began; to the genocide of the natives in the warfare led by American guns and cannons.

Memories retrieved let people see Americas hypocrisy and betrayal of its own ideals. This, manifested in exclusion of some from the premise of equality of all people, stated as self-evident truth in its founding document.

Carrying on the struggles of the past

Assange, through his work with WikiLeaks, not only informed the public about Americas troubled beginning but also provided a mechanism for people to redeem its unaccounted past. Throughout history, from the defiance of abolitionists to the womens suffrage movement, demands for equality came from below. Ordinary people pushed boundaries of the Constitution to make ideals in the Declaration of Independence legally binding.

The 60s brought political upheaval, and resistance came full force. Individuals like Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Malcolm X, through their united words and actions, inspired black people to mobilize in their fight to achieve civil rights. Mario Savio, the spokesperson for the free speech movement instigated the nation-wide student protests against government censorship and restriction of free speech on campus.

In this digital age, Assange, who has won numerous awards for journalism, found a way to help a new generation of America to carry on this struggle of the past. He did this by innovating a new form of journalism online that is run on free software.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Get our best delivered to your inbox.

Open experiment of democracy

Jrmie Zimmermann, a French computer science engineer and co-founder of the most prominent organization in Europe that defends online freedoms described free software as a social contract and noted that it is a way to organize a public sphere.

Zimmermann delved deeper to reveal that the drive behind free software is love. He described how, love is about understanding, understanding of flaws of others and of ourselves. He then spoke how free software is, a joyful practice with a role for everyone where we learn collectively about our flaws, where we learn to fail and love our failures, and learn about our failures.

With WikiLeaks as a project of free software, Assange brought love to the Internet that could transform it into becoming a powerful tool for democracy. This love shared among the youth who grew up on the Internet fueled acts of civil disobedience. The former US Army intelligence analyst, Chelsea Manning, lit the spark of conscience, by releasing the largest trove of state secrets in US history. This source behind WikiLeaks disclosure of the Bush Eras war crimes remains incarcerated for refusing to cooperate at a grand jury targeting the publisher.

From Manning to Jeremy Hammond to Edward Snowdenwaves of whistleblowers created an insurgency of contagious courage. People inside the institutions who want change came forward to defy the unjust laws in order to uphold the high ideals. This kick-started an open experiment of democracy, creating a network that seeks to understand flaws, collaborates to amend them, and invites all to participate in envisioning a new society.

"By releasing documents, WikiLeaks set a frozen history in motion. History is now happening, and Assanges plight for freedom is our story, where each person has a significant role to play."

Claiming our history

With this platform of democracy that Assange helped to launch, what did he try to do? Assange came to see how ordinary people are made passive; being tossed around and excluded from vital decision-making processes. He decided to side with those who are oppressed, wanting to help people recognize their own significance.

While being held in solitary confinement in a maximum high security prison in London, Assange was awarded the 2019 Dignity Prize for his support of Catalan peoples struggle for independence and their fight against Spanish police brutality. Just as he aspired to walk alongside Catalans on their path for self-determination from behind the computer screen inside a tiny room in the Ecuadorian embassy, where his every move was monitored by the CIA, he also cared about the destiny of America and what it is becoming.

After Mondays hearing, while being transported from Westminster Magistrates Court, Assange looked out at a crowd from inside a police van and acknowledged their support as a man shouted loudly, Stay strong, you will be free! Assange sacrificed his liberty so that we could all be free. By releasing documents, WikiLeaks set a frozen history in motion. History is now happening, and Assanges plight for freedom is our story, where each person has a significant role to play.

Only through each of us choosing freely to respond to this love for the world that Assange has demonstrated, may we be able to claim our own history. Only through love for one another that allows us to see perfection in our flaws, and find beauty in messes and our failures, can we begin to work to correct errors of our leadersand together to end this egregious miscarriage of justice.

Continue reading here:
Why Americansand the WorldOught to Be Concerned About Julian Assange's Extradition Case - Common Dreams

Two deceptions at the heart of Democrats’ impeachment brief – Washington Examiner

In a newly released impeachment brief, Democratic House managers argue that President Trump must be removed "immediately" to protect the integrity of the current presidential race. "The Senate must use that remedy now to safeguard the 2020 U.S. election," the managers write.

"The Senate should immediately remove President Trump from office to prevent further abuses," they continue. "He is an immediate threat to the nation and the rule of law. It is imperative that the Senate convict and remove him from office now."

Democrats insist on Trump's immediate removal because, they argue, he was the knowing beneficiary of Russian help in the 2016 election, and if he is not thrown out of office right now, he will do it again. But in making their argument, Democrats make two critical mischaracterizations about Trump, Republicans, and 2016. One is flat-out wrong, while the other is misleading.

The one that is flat wrong is the Democrats' assertion that Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate "a debunked conspiracy theory that Russia did not interfere in the 2016 presidential election to aid President Trump, but instead that Ukraine interfered in that election to aid President Trump's opponent, Hillary Clinton."

The problem is, the theory does not hold that Russia "did not interfere" in the 2016 election. There is a mountain of evidence that Russia interfered, and that has been the conclusion of every investigation into the matter, beginning with the first congressional probe, by the House Intelligence Committee under then-chairman Devin Nunes. The theory is that in addition to Russian interference, some people in Ukraine, including some government officials, also tried to influence the U.S. election. It was not a government-run effort, and it was on a far smaller scale than the Russian project, but it happened.

Trump and his supporters have long pointed to the example of Ukraine's interior minister, former prime minister, and ambassador to the U.S. taking to social media to condemn Trump during the campaign. They also point to a Ukrainian Parliament member's attacks on Paul Manafort and efforts to publicize a "black ledger" that contained an unverified allegation about Manafort being paid in cash for work in Ukraine. They also point to connections between anti-Trump figures in Ukraine and Fusion GPS, the American opposition research firm behind the sensational and false Steele dossier. Finally, they point to the mysterious actions of a Democratic National Committee employee who kept in touch with anti-Trump elements in Ukraine.

None of that is definitive, but it is also not debunked. And it is not a denial of Russian interference but a recognition that in addition to that interference, some in Ukraine also tried to influence the election.

Nevertheless, in the brief, Democrats make repeated reference to their own supposition that Trump and Republicans embraced "the theory that Ukraine, rather than Russia, interfered in the 2016 election." They even suggest that Trump and Republicans, in embracing a theory that they did not, in fact, embrace, were parroting Russian propaganda.

The other mischaracterization in the Democratic brief is the assertion that, in 2016, Trump "welcomed Russia's election interference." The brief quotes special counsel Robert Mueller's report that the Trump campaign welcomed Russian help because it "expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts."

That's not wrong Trump did, in fact, welcome Russia-based leaks but grossly out of context. The context is this: Trump welcomed Russia-based leaks about the Clinton campaign because the media were enthusiastically embracing and repeating Russian-based leaks about the Clinton campaign. Print, internet, TV, everyone, was accepting, repeating, and amplifying the material released by WikiLeaks from the Russian hack of top Clinton campaign official John Podesta.

Perhaps people have forgotten how prominently media organizations featured the Russia-based material. If they have, here are a dozen examples of headlines, just from the New York Times and just from the few weeks immediately before the 2016 election:

"CNN Cuts Ties to Analyst as Emails Show She Tipped Off Clinton Allies" (11/1/16)

"Leaks Lay Bare a Longtime Clinton Adviser's Unflinching Straight Talk" (10/29/16)

"Chelsea Clinton's Frustrations and Devotion Shown in Hacked Emails" (10/28/16)

"Donations to Foundation Vexed Hillary Clinton's Aides, Emails Show" (10/26/16)

"'We Need to Clean This Up,' Clinton Aide Frets in Newly Public Email" (10/26/16)

"A Constellation of Influencers; Behind the Curtain at Teneo" (10/23/16)

"Email Outlines Clinton's Potential No. 2s" (10/18/16)

"Genial Clinton Emerges in Hacked Transcripts of Goldman Sachs Talks" (10/15/16)

"Leaked Emails About Clinton Hearten Rival" (10/12/16)

"Emails Disclose Clinton's Strain to Hone Message" (10/11/16)

"Clinton Aides Were Wary of de Blasio, Emails Show" (10/10/16)

"Leaked Speech Excerpts Show Clinton at East With Wall Street and Free Trade" (10/7/16)

(The headlines are from the paper's print edition, as preserved in the Nexis database; slightly different headlines might exist in web editions.)

The Times editorial board even argued that the WikiLeaks disclosures showed Clinton should have been more open with the public in the months before the election. "Fuller disclosure would clearly have helped her when it came to her lucrative speeches to Wall Street," the paper wrote in an editorial headlined, "A WikiLeaks Lesson for Mrs. Clinton." "Imagine if months ago, Mrs. Clinton had done her own giant information release."

Of course, the Times was not the only media organization to trumpet the Russia-based leaks. They all trumpeted the Russia-based leaks. Everyone was complicit. And that is what makes the Democratic charge against Trump so misleading. He wasn't welcoming something that everyone else was condemning. He was welcoming something that everyone else was welcoming, too. And now, in retrospect, that is a terrible offense, part of the foundation for removing the president from office?

Neither mischaracterization in the Democratic brief is a mistake; Democratic prosecutors know full well what actually happened. But the mischaracterizations are necessary to build the case against the president, to show that he had corrupt motives in the Ukraine matter. They are, of course, not the entire case, but they are important. And they are wrong.

See the original post:
Two deceptions at the heart of Democrats' impeachment brief - Washington Examiner