« First «...10 20 30...1,088 1,0891,0901,091 1,092...1,100 1,110 1,120...»Last »

Made-up murder claims, threats to kill Twitter, rants about NSA spying anything but mention 100,000 US virus deaths, right, Mr President? – The…

Posted on May 29, 2020 by admin

Opinion In their natural habitat, when chimpanzees become angry, they often stand up, wave their arms, and throw branches or rocks anything nearby that they can get their hands on. When chimps are removed from the wild and kept in captivity, they experience stress and agitation, which can cause them to react in the same way by throwing things, explains the Jane Goodall Institute of Canada.

Captive chimpanzees are deprived of the diverse objects they would find in nature, and the most readily available projectile is feces. Since they also tend to get a pretty strong reaction from people when they do throw it, their behavior is reinforced and likely to be repeated, which explains the abundance of YouTube videos on this subject.

Crap-flinging has become a regular response from another angry, caged animal experiencing stress and agitation and the past 24 hours have seen such an extraordinary amount of it that as the excrement has piled up, the shock value has faded and the chimp, or chump, hurling the stuff is starting to get it on himself.

In the past 48 hours, there have been no less than 38 tweets from Donald Trump, every one designed to elicit outrage, upset and fury. Even by the current... standards of the current occupier of the White House, they were extraordinary.

But even though they touched every topic from free speech to voting to space exploration to surveillance, there was a common thread, and it was death.

President Trumps patently absurd and offensive claims that MSNBC TV host and former Republican lawmaker Joe Scarborough was behind the accidental death of a staffer decades ago began the pattern. It began with an allegation of murder, and morphed into an ugly line in the sand that no one was willing to cross for political sport, and even partisan news outlets slammed the American president's vile outbursts. To be clear: Scarborough didn't kill anyone.

The death of democracy came next: Californias effort to move to mail-in ballots to ensure the presidential election in November could carry on despite the coronavirus pandemic ravaging the country.

The ballots would be substantially fraudulent the Shit-Flinger-in-Chief warned. Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed.

It was too much even for Twitter, which created an entirely new feature for the occasion. Get the facts about mail-in ballots, reads an appended message to those tweets, leading to a separate spot on the social network outlining that not a single component of the foul-smelling claim is true.

But to a man on the look-out for a fight, this was a hit. Who dares silence conservative voices? Another turd quickly hurled out the West Wing window: We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen. Them being social networks like Twitter.

The president currently has no power to shut down law-abiding websites in the US just because he disagrees with their speech. An executive order is promised on Thursday tackling internet giants that have upset him, though this isn't the first time he's threatened such a thing.

By now, the pile of crap has started building and everyone is standing back, staring at the angry ape and keeping out of range. The fun seemingly over, Congress turns to leave. His bowels emptied, Trump looks around for something else to fling. And what will soon land on his desk but a bill authorizing the extension of controversial spying powers.

He flings it: WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE OF AMERICANS IS WRONG! Nothing. He tries again: If the FISA Bill is passed tonight on the House floor, I will quickly VETO it. Our Country has just suffered through the greatest political crime in its history. The massive abuse of FISA was a big part of it!

But no one is buying the claim that the man in the cage will kill programs that bring him so much information and power. In 2018, he authorized NSA snooping programs.

In a far corner there is the unmistakable stench of death. A black man named George Floyd lies there, motionless, having been needlessly, cruelly crushed under the knee of a white cop. It was captured on camera, all five excruciating minutes of it. Trump flings it.

At my request, the FBI and the Department of Justice are already well into an investigation as to the very sad and tragic death in Minnesota of George Floyd. I have asked for this investigation to be expedited and greatly appreciate all of the work done by local law enforcement. My heart goes out to Georges family and friends. Justice will be served!

But no one cares what Trump has to say; the ability to intone about, or inflame, race relations left long ago with the very fine people of Charlottesville. Arm aching, empty innards slumping; the crowd still there but increasingly bored. One last chance: a moment of national pride as NASA sends men to space.

The exhausted ape and his family is moved to Florida with a chance to relish in its power, and perhaps hitch a ride on a phallic explosion to dispel any thoughts of flaccid leadership. But it too died; a storm was brewing across the water so the NASA-SpaceX launch was postponed.

As the sun went down, the smell of stale sweat and crusted feces wafting around on the breeze, death finally arrived on its own terms. One hundred thousand or more souls taken by the coronavirus in America. The official count ticked over, and millions of phones across the land buzzed as the terrible milestone was reached. And it was all anyone cared about.

Kayleigh McEnany just accidentally revealed the key difference between the media and the Trump White House – KTVZ

Posted on May 29, 2020 by admin

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany thought she had scored a direct hit on the medias credibility during Thursdays press briefing.

Asked by CNNs Jim Acosta about Twitters decision to append a fact-check to President Donald Trumps false claim that mail-in balloting is a Democratic attempt to rig the 2020 election, McEnany said this: If youre going to get into the fact-checking business theres no one that should be fact-checked more than the mainstream media that has been continually wrong about a number of things.

She then went on to detail several instances including a 2017 CNN story in which we wrongly reported that Donald Trump and his son Donald Trump Jr. had received an email providing them access to hacked WikiLeaks emails before the public had access where mainstream media got reporting about Trump wrong.

In 2017, your network, CNN, botched their WikiLeaks email exclusive and were forced to make on-air corrections, McEnany scolded Acosta.

Pay very close attention to those last few words from McEnany make on-air corrections.

Yes! CNN did do that! And wrote an entire article about the initial article being wrong and detailed past errors we have made.

Because CNN is a big news organization that is ultimately just a lot of people trying to get it right. And because we are people, we dont always get it right. And when we get it wrong, we do our best to explain why and how and try to not make that same mistake again.

Thats how journalists maintain credibility with audiences. Not by never making a mistake, because that is impossible. Rather, by doing everything we can to get the story right and, when we dont, admitting we didnt. The very fact that we issue public corrections in the most transparent way possible is a testament to our commitment to getting it right.

Now, contrast that approach to how President Trump and the White House operate.

Trump, according to The Washington Posts Fact-Checker blog has said more than 18,000 false or misleading things in his first 1,170 days in office an average of 15 incorrect claims every single day he has been president.

Many politicians, faced with being fact-checked and deemed to have gotten something wrong, have one of two reactions: 1) They apologize for the misstatement or 2) (and this one is more common) they simply stop repeating the falsehood. Trump doubles, triples and quadruples down on known falsehoods.

When pressed about Trumps incorrect claims on Thursday, McEnany said this: Im around the President. His intent is always to give truthful information to the American people.

Sure! Most people do try to tell the truth most of the time! But even if you try to tell the truth all of the time, you get stuff wrong. It happens. Because we are human.

So, how many times has Trump or a member of his senior staff admitted they simply got something wrong? Uh, so, well, not many? And thats being very, very generous.

In fact, Trumps default response when he is asked to apologize for getting something wrong is an I-am-rubber-you-are-glue defense, attacking and blaming the media. Where is their apology to me for all of the incorrect stories?? Trump tweeted in June 2017.

In other words: Trump seeks to distract from his own comments and demands that he either retract or apologize for them by accusing someone else almost always the media of needing to apologize to him. Its sort of like this defense used by Al Pacino in And Justice For All.

What McEnanys response to Acosta, which was celebrated by conservative media, proves is the exact opposite of what she was going for. Its not that journalists arent willing to look in the mirror and admit their own mistakes. Its that the White House doesnt understand that journalists willingness to publicly acknowledge their mistakes is a sign of strength, not weakness.

True weakness is pretending that you never screw anything up. And that weakness leads to never learning from your mistakes because, well, you dont think youve many any.

Thats what McEnany revealed on Thursday even if she didnt mean to.

More:
Kayleigh McEnany just accidentally revealed the key difference between the media and the Trump White House - KTVZ

Regulation Of Cryptocurrency In China – Technology – China – Mondaq News Alerts

Posted on May 29, 2020 by admin

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Cryptocurrency-related activities have received little tolerancefrom the Chinese government. Initial coin offerings (ICO) werebanned in China in September 2017. Exchange platforms that tradedcryptocurrencies or provided facilitation services were alsoordered to be closed following the crackdown on ICO. Many exchangeschose to relocate to jurisdictions that are more favorable tocryptocurrencies than China. However, due to the long-armjurisdiction of the Chinese criminal laws, organizers and promotersof overseas ICO and exchanges may not be free from the jurisdictionof Chinese criminal laws, if those persons are Chinese citizens orif Chinese investors invested in overseas ICO or tradedcryptocurrencies on overseas exchanges.

Interestingly, it is not illegal to hold Bitcoins and othercryptocurrencies or even to buy or sell them in China. The Chinesegovernment also encourages the development and application ofblockchain technology, but made it clear that blockchain technologymust service the real economy.

1. ICO

China's Policy:

On September 4, 2017, seven government agencies of China, i.e.the People's Bank of China ("PBOC"), the CentralCybersecurity and Information Technology Lead Group of CommunistParty of China, the Ministry of Industry and InformationTechnology, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce,China Banking Regulatory Commission, China Security RegulatoryCommission and China Insurance Regulatory Commission, jointlyissued the "Notice regarding Prevention of Risks of TokenOffering and Financing" (the "Notice"). The Noticebanned all ICO in China and ordered that any organizations orindividuals who had previously completed ICO to make arrangementssuch as return of token assets to investors to protect investorrights.

Background:

To understand the harsh attitude of the Chinese governmenttowards ICO, we have to look at the big picture of China'seconomy and financial market. In the past 20 plus years, China hasenjoyed high speed economic development, which, many believe, cameat the cost of high leverage in the financial system andaccumulation of financial risks. In the past two years, control offinancial risks and stabilization of the financial system hasbecome the top priority of PBOC. Before ICO, internet platformsproviding P2P loans and micro lending had been targeted by PBOC andother financial regulators and are still in the process ofcleansing and rectification. It is no surprise that ICO, due to thesheer increase both in numbers and in the amount of funds raised,as well as some socially chaotic events caused by ICO, received thedeath sentence from PBOC.

Nature of ICO in the Eyes of PBOC:

In the Notice, ICO was described as a process by whichfundraisers distribute digital tokens to investors who makefinancial contributions in the form of cryptocurrencies such asBitcoin and Eethereum. The Notice further pointed out: "Bynature, it is an unauthorized and illegal public financingactivity, which involves financial crimes such as illegaldistribution of financial tokens, illegal issuance of securitiesand illegal fundraising, financial fraud and pyramidscheme."

Among the crimes mentioned in the Notice, "illegalfundraising", which generally means raising funds withoutgovernment approval, is a crime that has been widely used incracking down on undesirable financial activities as the scope ofthe crime can be interpreted very broadly.

Overseas ICO:

It should be noted that even ICO outside of China are notcompletely safe if they attracted Chinese investors. According toArticle 6 of the PRC Criminal Law, if any of the criminalactivities or results of such activities occurred in China, thecrime is deemed to have occurred in the territory of China. If theICO involved financial crimes based on Chinese criminal lawstandards, the promotors or organizers of those ICO may potentiallybe subject to Chinese criminal liabilities if they are Chinesecitizens. Even if they are not Chinese citizens, if overseas ICOattracted Chinese investors, they may still potentially be subjectto Chinese criminal liabilities.

Initial Miner Offerings (IMO):

After ICO was banned by the Chinese government in September2017, a new business model quickly became popular, which was called"Initial Miner Offerings" (IMOs). In contrast to ICO, theorganizers sell mining equipment to investors initially, and theinvestors are awarded with tokens or points for their miningactivities using the equipment. On January 12, 2018, the NationalInternet Finance Association of China ("NIFA")[1] issuedthe "Risk Alert concerning Prevention of Disguised ICOActivities", in which NIFA pointed out that an IMO involvesfundraising activities and is a disguised form of ICO. Followingthe NIFA alert, the IMO market in China also went down.

2.Exchanges

China's Policy:

The Notice also targeted cryptocurrency exchanges and orderedthat any so-called "fundraising and trading platforms"shall not:

- Offer exchange services between fiat currency, tokens and"virtual currencies";

- Buy or sell tokens or "virtual currencies", or buyor sell "virtual currencies" as a central counterparties(CCP); or

- Provide price determination or information intermediaryservices for tokens or "virtual currencies".

Adjustments of Market Players:

In the several months after the Notice, most of thecryptocurrency exchanges closed down their platforms in China butcontinued exchange business through platforms registered in foreignjurisdictions such as Japan, Hong Kong, Korea or otherjurisdictions which seemed to be more favorable to the exchangebusiness than China.

They also made adjustments to their business models. To avoiddirect confrontation with Chinese monetary authorities, someexchanges no longer provided exchange services between fiatcurrency and cryptocurrencies. Some chose to introduce a new token(such as USDT, QC, etc.) to their platforms which has valueequivalent to the value of fiat currency, as an intermediarybetween fiat currency and cryptocurrency. Investors may use fiatcurrency to buy this new token and then use this new token to buycryptocurrency.

Further, many exchanges launched peer-to-peer trading platformsthat support direct transactions between investors without theexchange acting as a CCP. On those platforms, one investor can buycryptocurrencies from another investor and pay the seller via banktransfers, Alipay or Wechat pay[1].

Legality of Adjusted BusinessModels:

Those modified business models are not entirely safe from theChinese criminal law perspective. Although major exchanges havebeen relocated overseas, they may still be subject to Chinesecriminal liabilities due to the long-arm jurisdiction of theChinese criminal laws. If the founders or managers of an exchangeare Chinese nationals, or they make decisions in China to operatethe overseas exchange, or the investors are in China, if theexchange performs prohibited functions, Chinese justice authoritieswould still have jurisdiction over those persons.

Access to Overseas Exchanges:

To further prevent Chinese investors from purchasing and tradingcryptocurrencies on overseas exchanges, China has blocked internetaccess to the websites of some overseas exchanges from China.According to Chinese laws, no person should use the internet toview information that violates Chinese laws and regulations. Thosewho access overseas exchanges via virtual private networks(VPN's) may potentially face risks if the exchanges containprohibited information. In January 2017, the Ministry of Industryand Information Technology ruled that only authorized VPN'scould be used in China. The sale or provision of VPN services bycompanies or individuals without telecom licenses issued by Chinesetelecom authorities became illegal.

3. Mining Activities

It was reported that on January 2, 2018, the Working TeamLeading Risk Control and Rectification concerning Internet Finance,a special task force established under the State Council, issuednotices to local governments requesting them to take measures to"guide" Bitcoin mining operators to exit from theirrespective regions. Since then, major miners reportedly decreasedor ceased their operations in China, once the largest mining basein the world, and moved to more favorable countries, similar to themove of the cryptocurrency exchanges.

4. Legality of Holding and TradingCryptocurrencies

In view of China's harsh attitude towards ICO,cryptocurrency exchanges and mining activities, some may assumethat it would be illegal for Chinese to hold or trade Bitcoins orother cryptocurrencies. This is not correct. No PRC law orregulation prohibits Chinese investors from holdingcryptocurrencies or trading cryptocurrencies . This seems to beconsistent with an early notice jointly issued by five Chinesegovernment agencies led by PBOC back in 2013, which defined Bitcoinas a special virtual commodity, but not a currency. That noticealso explicitly provides that Bitcoin does not have legal status asa currency and should not be circulated and used in the market as acurrency. This should still be the position taken by PBOC as oftoday.

Article 127 of the General Rules of the Civil Law of China,which took effect on October 1, 2017, provides that: "In caselaws have provisions on the protection of data and internet virtualproperties, such laws should be complied with." Some Expertsbelieve that this means that one of the basic laws in Chinarecognizes the legal status of cryptocurrencies as virtualproperty.

5. Transfer of Payments Using BlockchainTechnology

Senior officials of PBOC have publicly encouraged the use ofblockchain technology to improve the convenience, promptness andlow cost of retail payments. In fact, PBOC established its ownDigital Currency Research Institute for the goal of issuing digitalmoney. It should be noted, however, that China's digital moneywould still be fully controlled by the central government, incontrast to the nongovernmental nature of Bitcoin.

According to news reports, in December 2017, China MerchantsBank, Wing Lung Bank of Hong Kong and Wing Lung Bank, ShenzhenBranch have successfully completed cross-border transfers ofRenminbi[4] payments using blockchain technology. Many other bankshave reportedly made experiments and even progress on the use ofblockchain technology to improve their transaction systems.

6. The Future of Blockchain in China

Despite the ban on ICO and cryptocurrency exchanges, PBOC andother government agencies have consistently showed great enthusiasmtowards the application of blockchain technology for the goal ofmodernizing China's financial systems and becoming a worldleader in this new innovative technology. In recent years, variousguidelines and papers issued by the government have endorsedblockchain technology and even placed blockchain technology in thesame category of big data and artificial intelligence (AI). In thepast twelve months, many local governments sponsored the formationof sizable investment funds to make investment in startups ofblockchain technology and applications.

However, the endorsement of blockchain technology is not withoutreservation. In the view of PBOC, blockchain technology and digitalcurrency should be researched for the goal of better service to thereal economy. PBOC believes that blockchain technology can bedeveloped without the use of tokens, which are believed to havebeen the roots of various social problems such as illegalfundraising and fraud.

Footnotes

1. The current leaders of NIFA are former seniorofficials of PBOC, and alerts issued by NIFA often predict the nextmoves of PBOC.

2. Both of which are popular third party payment APPs inChina.

3. Given that cryptocurrency exchanges were banned inChina, cryptocurrencies may only be traded in a peer-to-peermanner.

4. Official currency of China.

The content of this article is intended to provide a generalguide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be soughtabout your specific circumstances.

Investors fear cryptocurrency CEO accused of stealing millions could be on the run – News24

Posted on May 29, 2020 by admin

07:53 29/05/2020 Buks Viljoen, Correspondent

A man accused of stealing millions from Bitcoin investors appears to have made a run for it.

Investors who were contacted by News24 said they have not heard from the CEO of VaultAge Solutions (VS), Willie Breedt, since December when he promised to pay back their money.

The Hawks have stepped in to investigate after an investor opened a case of fraud against Breedt.

Some have speculated Breedt is staying at a luxury mansion in the well-known Marina Martinique Estate in Ashton Bay, Jeffrey's Bay.

However, officially he seems to be still out of the country.

According to information from the Department of Home Affairs, Breedt left the country for Mozambique on 21 December via the Kosi Bay border post.

There is no indication on the system he had returned to the country; however, a source said a glitch in the system might not have updated his movements.

Hundreds of investors

In the meantime, investors are concerned they will never see their money again.

VaultAge Solutions, which is not registered as a legitimate financial institution with the Financial Services Conduct Authority (FSCA), has more than 2 000 investors.

Millions of rand have been invested in Breedt's cryptocurrency scheme, with one investor depositing more than R6 million.

Pleas to return the money have fallen on deaf ears.

READ |Hawks investigate cryptocurrency CEO after investors cry foul

Besides a few generic emails from Breedt promising to repay the outstanding amounts, no other communication has been received.

"I don't have R50 in my purse," Lettie Engelbrecht from Krugersdorp said.

"We are pensioners and invested R200000. From December until April, we received payments on the growth of our investment. Since then, we never got any money. We are desperate and living on a shoestring budget."

In a written reply to News24, Breedt said: "I am busy attendingto the commitments I have made to members. The commitment is to have all the initial capital paid back by 31 May."

Case under investigation

He, however, did not respond to the questions about his whereabouts and his visit to Mozambique.

Hawks spokesperson Colonel Katlego Mogale confirmed they were still investigating the case and "cannot reveal any information at this stage".

Bitcoin hodl waves indicate 60% of the cryptocurrency is being hoarded analysts suggest a bull run could be – Business Insider India

Posted on May 29, 2020 by admin

What is hodling?According to Bitcoin analyst Phillip Swift, 60% of all the Bitcoin (BTC) available has not moved in the last one year essentially, this 60% of the cryptocurrency has not been traded at all. This is known as hodling a term that means holding but is spelled as such due to a typing error.

60% of all bitcoin has not moved on the blockchain for at least 1 year. This is an indication of significant hodling. The last time this happened was in early 2016, at the start of the bull run, said Swift.Advertisement

Interest from institutional investors like Goldman Sachs turned Bitcoin investors bullishOne of the reasons behind the massive hodling in Bitcoin could be the interest from institutional investors like Goldman Sachs and hedge funds.Advertisement

Apart from GS, well known hedge fund manager and founder of Tudor Investment Corp., Paul Tudor Jones came out in support of Bitcoin. Bitcoin reminds me of gold when I first got into the business in 1976, he said in a market outlook note.

The best profit-maximizing strategy is to own the fastest horse. If I am forced to forecast, my bet is it will be Bitcoin, he further added.Advertisement

Bitcoin stalls at key $10,000 resistance level, but has significant upside if it can break through

Billionaire investor Paul Tudor Jones says he's loading up on bitcoin (GBTC)

See the article here:
Bitcoin hodl waves indicate 60% of the cryptocurrency is being hoarded analysts suggest a bull run could be - Business Insider India

BitPay Awarded Best Alternative Payment Solution from CNP Summit – AiThority

Posted on May 29, 2020 by admin

BitPay, the worlds largest provider of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency payment services, today announced the company wonBest Alternative Payment Solution from CNP Summit. Each year, the CNP Awards is the only awards competition honoring the companies, programs and solutions that have distinguished themselves in the card not present space throughout the year. Over the last few months, the CNP panel of independent industry experts and the nominees customers have been deliberating on the winners for this years program.

Businesses of all kinds are being forced to adapt and innovate in this unprecedented year, said D.J. Murphy, editor-in-chief of Card Not Present. Merchants in the e-commerce fraud and payments community, facing completely new online shopping and fraud patterns, are working hand-in-hand with service providers to respond. Weve done that as well. This year, were fortunate to be able to unveil the CNP Awardsthe standard by which companies in this industry are recognized and judgedvirtually for the first time. We congratulate all the winners and hope to see them and the rest of our community in person next year.

Recommended AI News:Topgolf and Golf Scope Partner to Launch New Virtual Reality Game

In selecting BitPay, CNP said that BitPay was one of the first platforms widely adopted for processing cryptocurrency and blockchain-based payments and has become one of the largest and most well-known in the space. It is one of eight first-time winners in this years CNP Awards, nabbing the Judges Choice award in the Best Alternative Payment Solution category. The company has traced the evolution of digital currency, starting by enabling mostly small businesses to leverage a new way to pay online and growing to service enterprises as cryptocurrency gained legitimacy. One of the reasons cryptocurrency continues to gain the confidence of merchants of all sizes is they are protected from chargebacks.

Recommended AI News:Proof Of Impact Launches B2B Platform So Companies Can Track Their Impact

In 2011, BitPay saw the potential to make it easy for businesses to accept blockchain payments and revolutionize the financial industry, said Bill Zielke, Chief Marketing Officer with BitPay. The CNP Award highlights this recognition and supports our goal to move cryptocurrency payments mainstream.

BitPay is a pioneer and leader in global blockchain payments. The Companys suite of products enable businesses to accept cryptocurrency payments globally for ecommerce goods and services or cross border transactions while receiving settlements in fiat currency. In addition, BitPay powers a secure wallet that can be used to store cryptocurrency, make payments or liquidate cryptocurrency to fund a Visa prepaid debit card or dozens of retail gift cards.

Share and Enjoy !

5 Industries that are going to be dominated by cryptocurrency and blockchain technology – Crypto News Flash

Posted on May 29, 2020 by admin

There is no doubt about the fact that cryptocurrencies and Blockchain technology are a disruptive and revolutionary force. Ever since Satoshi Nakamoto first created Bitcoin in 2008, it has redefined the way we look at our financial systems, transaction technologies and governmental control over economy.

In the last ten years, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have established themselves as a real alternative financial asset system to traditional fiat currencies. Likewise, Blockchain technology has also proven itself an incorruptible, fast and efficient mechanism of doing transactions.

In this article, we are going to focus on five industries that are seeing increased exposure from cryptocurrencies and Blockchain technology.

Online gaming is a huge multi-billion dollar industry that is experiencing double-digit year-on-year growth for the last five odd years. Experts predict that this industry is going to see an exponential rise not only in the number of players, but also revenues and profits.

Tencent, a leading China based financial investment corporation has bought controlling rights in some of the most famous games ever, including Clash of Clans. Gaming companies are already experimenting with crypto payments and Blockchain technology on a massive level.

One industry, which has faced the brunt of the Coronavirus pandemic, has been the financial investment sector. With markets crashing all over the world, investors have lost trillions of dollars worth of investments in a very short span of time.

The option is either to go back to investing in precious metals like gold and silver (which are hedges against rising inflation) or look towards the future. The future is investing in cryptocurrencies and Blockchain technology and getting trustpedia.io. The stability and security of investments has been on display even during the Coronavirus lockdown.

The Coronavirus pandemic saw the worlds worst oil crisis ever. With zero demand for oil globally, the oil and energy sector saw its sharpest fall in recent times. On the other hand, industries, which are powering alternative energy solutions, saw their stocks rise.

Many industries who are innovating on new technology favour cryptocurrencies as the future of financial systems. They are also actively working with Blockchain technology as a fast, safe and efficient model of transaction. This association is expected to get strengthened further in the coming years.

United Nations along with other global organizations like the Red Cross are engaging with cryptocurrencies as a fast model of reaching currency to the most underprivileged parts of the world. During the Coronavirus pandemic, the Italian Red Cross also started accepting donations and emergency funds from donors in Bitcoins.

NGOs all over the world have explored the immediacy, which is associated with crypto and Blockchain technology. This becomes very critical especially when it comes to transferring relief materials and funds to the people most affected by natural calamities, wars, insurgency, etc.

Last but definitely not the least, the IT industry and SaaS service providers are exploring and dealing with cryptocurrencies from a number of clients. They are also reworking their systems and processes at the behest of clients who want to shift to Blockchain technology.

Over the past few years, more and more clients, especially in the Supply and Logistics services like billion dollar fashion brands and huge FMCG manufacturers are experimenting with Blockchain technology on an unprecedented scale. It is expected that this collaboration is going to rise incrementally in the coming years.

While everyone believes in the meritorious nature of cryptocurrencies and Blockchain technology, brands and industries are still a bit sceptical owing to legal issues and regulations. However, experts feel that the more powerful industries get into the game, the more will be the lobbying effect they will start having on governments and policy makers.

Follow this link:
5 Industries that are going to be dominated by cryptocurrency and blockchain technology - Crypto News Flash

Irvingteen Teen Faces Civil Suit Over Alleged Theft of Cryptocurrency – River Journal Staff

Posted on May 29, 2020 by admin

(Photo by David McBee on Pexel.com)

A lawsuit alleging the theft of cryptocurrency in the millions of dollars has been brought against Irvington teen Ellis Pinsky, 18, by Michael Terpin, a marketer and advisor to cryptocurrency and technology companies and an investor in cryptocurrency.

The lawsuit, filed in May in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, names Pinsky and other defendants as being a gang of cybercriminals who used SIM-swapping to steal the Altcoin held in Terpins native wallet. At the time of the crime Terpin alleges Pinsky committed, Pinsky was 15, and according to Terpin the crypto stolen was worth $24 million.

By filing the lawsuit now, Terpin hopes federal criminal charges can be brought to bear against the defendants who, like Pinsky, are now adults.

Elliss attorney, Noam Biale of the firm Sher Tremonte, gave the following statement to the River Journal.

This case is about a grown man using his wealth to bully a defenseless teenager. Ellis should be focused on finishing high school but instead he has no choice but to fight this effort to destroy his life and future. We look forward to helping Ellis stand up to these abusive tactics in court.

Terpin, who grew up in Buffalo NY and attended Syracuse University before moving to the West Coast, seeks monetary damages triple the amount he alleges was stolen from him and is also hoping the lawsuit deters Pinsky and others seeking to engage in this sort of cybercrime in the future. Terpin recently received a judgment against Nick Truglia who also stole crypto from him by SIM-swap and he stands aggrieved by Truglias cavalier attitude about his crime and the punishment he received.

Thats how these kids are thinking, theyre like twenty years old and theyll just have to lay low for a little while and then theyll be able to live like kings. So, this is all about making that not too easy to do.

Biale is going to be responding to the complaint on or before July 31. So far, no criminal charges have been filed against Pinsky or the other defendants and whether this case will affect Pinskys college prospects cannot be determined at this time.

Link:
Irvingteen Teen Faces Civil Suit Over Alleged Theft of Cryptocurrency - River Journal Staff

Cryptocurrency Market Update: Bitcoin bleeding as the market gets ready for CME futures expiration – FXStreet

Posted on May 29, 2020 by admin

The cryptocurrency market volatility is on the rise as the market gets ready for Bitcoins futures expiration on CME. These contracts expire every two months and often lead to the sell-off on the spot market. According to the recent data, compiled by Cointelegraph and Arcane Research, BTC/USD tends to lose 2.3% of its value ahead of the expiration. The traders will be closely watching the spot prices to be ready to react to the situation.

Currently, the total capitalization of all digital assets in circulation is registered at $264 billion, while an average daily trading volume reached $110 billion. Bitcoins market share increased to 66%.

Read also:Cryptocurrency Market News: Cardano and Bitcoin set the pace for the end of May crypto rallies

Bitcoin (BTC) hit the intraday high above $9,600 and retreated to $9,450 by press time. At the time of writing, the first digital coin is moving within the strong bearish trend amid expanding volatility. Since the start of the day, BTC/USD has lost nearly 1.5%, though it is still 3% higher from this time on Thursday. The resistance area of $9,500-$9,600 remains unconquered so far. The support is created by $9,000.

Ethereum tested the intraday high of $224.80 during early Asian hours on Friday, but retreated to $220.30 by the time of writing. The second-largest digital asset has stayed unchanged since the start of the day, though it is still nearly 7% higher from this time on Thursday. Despite the retreat from the intraday high, the price is moving within a bullish trend amid low volatility.

XRP/USD has experienced a sharp decline below $0.2000 after a failed attempt to clear a strong resistance at $0.2030. At the time of writing, XRP/USD is changing hands at $0.1980, down 1% since the beginning of the day and mostly unchanged on a day-to-day basis.

Litecoin (LTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) are also experiencing sharp sell-offs. Both coins has lost over 1% of their respective value in les than 5 minutes. LTC/USD is changing hands at $44.54, BCH/USD - $237.45

See the article here:
Cryptocurrency Market Update: Bitcoin bleeding as the market gets ready for CME futures expiration - FXStreet

Anti-Encryption Bill Threatens to Kill Online Privacy in the U.S., but Does It Stand a Real Chance of Passing? – CPO Magazine

Posted on May 28, 2020 by admin

Introduced just as mass panic over the coronavirus was beginning to set in, the EARN IT Act likely would have seen a lot more media coverage if the circumstances were more normal. Submitted on March 12 by a bipartisan coalition of senators, the bill would form a government commission tasked with creating a best practices list that every website would be subject to. Should a site not be in compliance with the terms of this list, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act would no longer apply to it; meaning that the site could be held legally responsible for the actions of any of its users.

So what makes it an anti-encryption bill? Its the fact that the Attorney Generals office would have the lions share of influence over the creation of this list, and the present Attorney General has been vociferous about wanting to put an end to encrypted communications.

Sponsored by Senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal, the EARN IT Act enjoys support from high-profile members of Congress on both sides of the aisle. Both sides have also been careful to stress to the media that it is not an anti-encryption bill as nothing in its wording mentions encryption.

Critics, such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), say that this is a disingenuous dodge. As long as the bill puts most of the power in the hands of the Attorney Generals office, and as long as Attorney General William Barr is at his post, it is a virtual guarantee that encryption will immediately be attacked.

Before you continue reading, how about a follow on LinkedIn?

If passed, the bill would create a 19-person commission headed by the Attorney General and composed of representatives from various law enforcement agencies; overwhelmingly one would expect these to be people who have an interest in creating encryption backdoors for the government. Law enforcement officials would outnumber any other group on the panel, and the Attorney General would have veto power over any proposed best practices and would also be required to approve them.

The main rationale behind the anti-encryption bill is that law enforcement agencies do not have adequate tools to pursue pedophiles and child sex trafficking. The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) has been the most active in agitating for these terms, and has made clear that trading privacy and the ability to use encryption is acceptable. The organization also wants to play an outsized role in this process. It has proposed that the best practices all sites would be subject to include screening all encrypted messages on the platform using technology that is approved by law enforcement and reporting any illegal content to the NCMEC.

This would give the NCMEC unprecedented access to the private communications of Americans, and also effectively ban all encryption that is not approved by law enforcement (read: contains backdoors for them to use). As the EFF points out, encryption subject to these terms would become useless even outside of these contexts. Encryption with mandatory backdoors will eventually become compromised by a threat actor.

Barr has expressed consistent opposition to strong encryption since he was appointed in early 2019. He openly called for backdoors and an anti-encryption bill in a series of speeches just a few months later, and in early 2020 called on Apple to insert encryption backdoors in its devices in response to the investigation of the Pensacola Naval Base shootings. However, this is a longstanding position with the Department of Justice and law enforcement agencies that dates back to at least the Obama administration.

Section 230 protections are absolutely vital to any online business or platform that allows user-generated content, even if it is nothing more than humble forum posts. Companies would otherwise drown in lawsuits, and in anticipation of removal of Section 230 terms would likely reduce services or eliminate them entirely.

This anti-encryption bill would not just hurt private companies, but would also have a chilling effect on free speech. The amount of outlets available to the individual would shrink dramatically almost overnight if self-publishing and social media companies were faced with the choice of using only insecure encryption or being held liable for anything anyone ever publishes through their services. Those that remained would likely become extremely heavy-handed in their moderation policies out of fear of legal liability.

The NCMECs push for this extreme state of affairs seems to disregard that these platforms are already legally obligated to monitor their services for child abuse in most states and by the federal FOSTA-SESTA act, and already report millions of incidents per year to the organization. Platforms are already incentivized to seek out and eliminate this sort of material as existing federal law allows for potential prosecution for negligence or facilitating in these cases (see the death of Backpage.com as an example).

At the very least, the passage of this bill might cause a mass exodus of small and innovative tech companies from the United States.

The anti-encryption bill is presently still in the proposal stage, making it difficult to accurately predict its chances of passing. But at the moment, the Skopos Labs AI prediction algorithm gives it only a 4% chance of passing standard for any new bill that does not enjoy some unusual amount of public support.

NCMEC proposed that technology used for encrypting messages must be 'approved by law enforcement' raising concerns of #encryption backdoors. #dataprotection #respectdata Click to Tweet

The bill will face heavy opposition at every step of the way from a coalition of both the biggest privacy and civil rights advocacy groups (such as the ACLU and EFF) and major tech companies. Though the support of online platforms should not be expected to be universal Match Group, parent company of messaging apps OKCupid and Tinder, has already stated support for the bill (likely due to nothing in the companys portfolio of services making use of encryption).

Read the original:
Anti-Encryption Bill Threatens to Kill Online Privacy in the U.S., but Does It Stand a Real Chance of Passing? - CPO Magazine

« First «...10 20 30...1,088 1,0891,0901,091 1,092...1,100 1,110 1,120...»Last »