Cloud Encryption Software Market Emerging Trends, Global Demand and Business Opportunities 2020 to 2026 – 3rd Watch News

COVID-19 Impact Analysis of Cloud Encryption Software Market

[Los Angeles], [United States], May 2020, The Cloud Encryption Software Market research report includes an in-sight study of the key [Global Cloud Encryption Software Market Size, Status and Forecast 2018-2025] market prominent players along with the company profiles and planning adopted by them. This helps the buyer of the Cloud Encryption Software report to gain a clear view of the competitive landscape and accordingly plan Cloud Encryption Software market strategies. An isolated section with top key players is provided in the report, which provides a complete analysis of price, gross, revenue(Mn), Cloud Encryption Software specifications, and company profiles. The Cloud Encryption Software study is segmented by Module Type, Test Type, And Region.

The market size section gives the Cloud Encryption Software market revenue, covering both the historic growth of the market and the forecasting of the future. Moreover, the report covers a host of company profiles, who are making a mark in the industry or have the potential to do so. The profiling of the players includes their market size, key product launches, information regarding the strategies they employ, and others. The report identifies the total market sales generated by a particular firm over a period of time. Industry experts calculate share by taking into account the product sales over a period and then dividing it by the overall sales of the Cloud Encryption Software industry over a defined period.

Download Full PDF Sample Copy of Report: https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/701246/global-cloud-encryption-software-market

Key Manufacturers of Cloud Encryption Software Market include: Gemalto, HPE, IBM, Microsoft, Symantec, Thales E-Security, Ciphercloud, Netskope, Trend Micro, Parablu

The research covers the current market size of the [Global Cloud Encryption Software Market Size, Status and Forecast 2018-2025]and its growth rates based on 5 year history data. It also covers various types of segmentation such as by geography North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific etc., by product type Cloud-based, On-premise, by applications BFSI, Manufacturing, Healthcare, Government, Others in overall market. The in-depth information by segments of Cloud Encryption Softwaremarket helps monitor performance & make critical decisions for growth and profitability. It provides information on trends and developments, focuses on markets and materials, capacities, technologies, CAPEX cycle and the changing structure of the [Global Cloud Encryption Software Market Size, Status and Forecast 2018-2025].

This study also contains company profiling, product picture and specifications, sales, market share and contact information of various international, regional, and local vendors of [Global Cloud Encryption Software Market Size, Status and Forecast 2018-2025]. The market competition is constantly growing higher with the rise in technological innovation and M&A activities in the industry. Moreover, many local and regional vendors are offering specific application products for varied end-users. The new vendor entrants in the market are finding it hard to compete with the international vendors based on quality, reliability, and innovations in technology.

Read Detailed Index of full Research Study: https://www.qyresearch.com/index/detail/701246/global-cloud-encryption-software-market

Geographically,this report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue (million USD), and market share and growth rate of Cloud Encryption Softwarein these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering

Please Check below Chapters to display the [Global Cloud Encryption Software Market Size, Status and Forecast 2018-2025].

Table of Contents

1 Report Overview1.1 Study Scope1.2 Key Market Segments1.3 Players Covered1.4 Market Analysis by Type1.4.1 Global Cloud Encryption Software Market Size Growth Rate by Type (2013-2025)1.4.2 Cloud-based1.4.3 On-premise1.5 Market by Application1.5.1 Global Cloud Encryption Software Market Share by Application (2013-2025)1.5.2 BFSI1.5.3 Manufacturing1.5.4 Healthcare1.5.5 Government1.5.6 Others1.6 Study Objectives1.7 Years Considered

2 Global Growth Trends2.1 Cloud Encryption Software Market Size2.2 Cloud Encryption Software Growth Trends by Regions2.2.1 Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Regions (2013-2025)2.2.2 Cloud Encryption Software Market Share by Regions (2013-2018)2.3 Industry Trends2.3.1 Market Top Trends2.3.2 Market Drivers2.3.3 Market Opportunities

3 Market Share by Key Players3.1 Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Manufacturers3.1.1 Global Cloud Encryption Software Revenue by Manufacturers (2013-2018)3.1.2 Global Cloud Encryption Software Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2013-2018)3.1.3 Global Cloud Encryption Software Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)3.2 Cloud Encryption Software Key Players Head office and Area Served3.3 Key Players Cloud Encryption Software Product/Solution/Service3.4 Date of Enter into Cloud Encryption Software Market3.5 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans

4 Breakdown Data by Type and Application4.1 Global Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Type (2013-2018)4.2 Global Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Application (2013-2018)

5 United States5.1 United States Cloud Encryption Software Market Size (2013-2018)5.2 Cloud Encryption Software Key Players in United States5.3 United States Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Type5.4 United States Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Application

6 Europe6.1 Europe Cloud Encryption Software Market Size (2013-2018)6.2 Cloud Encryption Software Key Players in Europe6.3 Europe Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Type6.4 Europe Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Application

7 China7.1 China Cloud Encryption Software Market Size (2013-2018)7.2 Cloud Encryption Software Key Players in China7.3 China Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Type7.4 China Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Application

8 Japan8.1 Japan Cloud Encryption Software Market Size (2013-2018)8.2 Cloud Encryption Software Key Players in Japan8.3 Japan Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Type8.4 Japan Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Application

9 Southeast Asia9.1 Southeast Asia Cloud Encryption Software Market Size (2013-2018)9.2 Cloud Encryption Software Key Players in Southeast Asia9.3 Southeast Asia Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Type9.4 Southeast Asia Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Application

10 India10.1 India Cloud Encryption Software Market Size (2013-2018)10.2 Cloud Encryption Software Key Players in India10.3 India Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Type10.4 India Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Application

11 Central & South America11.1 Central & South America Cloud Encryption Software Market Size (2013-2018)11.2 Cloud Encryption Software Key Players in Central & South America11.3 Central & South America Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Type11.4 Central & South America Cloud Encryption Software Market Size by Application

12 International Players Profiles12.1 Gemalto12.1.1 Gemalto Company Details12.1.2 Company Description and Business Overview12.1.3 Cloud Encryption Software Introduction12.1.4 Gemalto Revenue in Cloud Encryption Software Business (2013-2018)12.1.5 Gemalto Recent Development12.2 HPE12.2.1 HPE Company Details12.2.2 Company Description and Business Overview12.2.3 Cloud Encryption Software Introduction12.2.4 HPE Revenue in Cloud Encryption Software Business (2013-2018)12.2.5 HPE Recent Development12.3 IBM12.3.1 IBM Company Details12.3.2 Company Description and Business Overview12.3.3 Cloud Encryption Software Introduction12.3.4 IBM Revenue in Cloud Encryption Software Business (2013-2018)12.3.5 IBM Recent Development12.4 Microsoft12.4.1 Microsoft Company Details12.4.2 Company Description and Business Overview12.4.3 Cloud Encryption Software Introduction12.4.4 Microsoft Revenue in Cloud Encryption Software Business (2013-2018)12.4.5 Microsoft Recent Development12.5 Symantec12.5.1 Symantec Company Details12.5.2 Company Description and Business Overview12.5.3 Cloud Encryption Software Introduction12.5.4 Symantec Revenue in Cloud Encryption Software Business (2013-2018)12.5.5 Symantec Recent Development12.6 Thales E-Security12.6.1 Thales E-Security Company Details12.6.2 Company Description and Business Overview12.6.3 Cloud Encryption Software Introduction12.6.4 Thales E-Security Revenue in Cloud Encryption Software Business (2013-2018)12.6.5 Thales E-Security Recent Development12.7 Ciphercloud12.7.1 Ciphercloud Company Details12.7.2 Company Description and Business Overview12.7.3 Cloud Encryption Software Introduction12.7.4 Ciphercloud Revenue in Cloud Encryption Software Business (2013-2018)12.7.5 Ciphercloud Recent Development12.8 Netskope12.8.1 Netskope Company Details12.8.2 Company Description and Business Overview12.8.3 Cloud Encryption Software Introduction12.8.4 Netskope Revenue in Cloud Encryption Software Business (2013-2018)12.8.5 Netskope Recent Development12.9 Trend Micro12.9.1 Trend Micro Company Details12.9.2 Company Description and Business Overview12.9.3 Cloud Encryption Software Introduction12.9.4 Trend Micro Revenue in Cloud Encryption Software Business (2013-2018)12.9.5 Trend Micro Recent Development12.10 Parablu12.10.1 Parablu Company Details12.10.2 Company Description and Business Overview12.10.3 Cloud Encryption Software Introduction12.10.4 Parablu Revenue in Cloud Encryption Software Business (2013-2018)12.10.5 Parablu Recent Development

13 Market Forecast 2018-202513.1 Market Size Forecast by Regions13.2 United States13.3 Europe13.4 China13.5 Japan13.6 Southeast Asia13.7 India13.8 Central & South America13.9 Market Size Forecast by Product (2018-2025)13.10 Market Size Forecast by Application (2018-2025)

14 Analysts Viewpoints/Conclusions

15 Appendix15.1 Research Methodology15.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach15.1.1.1 Research Programs/Design15.1.1.2 Market Size Estimation12.1.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation15.1.2 Data Source15.1.2.1 Secondary Sources15.1.2.2 Primary Sources15.2 Disclaimer15.3 Author Details

About Us:

QY Research established in 2007, focus on custom research, management consulting, IPO consulting, industry chain research, data base and seminar services. The company owned a large basic data base (such as National Bureau of statistics database, Customs import and export database, Industry Association Database etc), experts resources (included energy automotive chemical medical ICT consumer goods etc.

See original here:
Cloud Encryption Software Market Emerging Trends, Global Demand and Business Opportunities 2020 to 2026 - 3rd Watch News

Why the Department of Justice Keeps Asking Apple to Unlock iPhones – Medium

Photo by Thom on Unsplash

If youve been following the news much this week, one story, in particular, may have inspired a sense of deja vu. William Barr, President Donald Trumps current Attorney General appeared in front of cameras alongside FBI Director Christopher Wray to explain how after several months of tinkering, they had managed to successfully crack the phone of the shooter and apparent Al-Qaeda affiliate Mohammed Saeed Alshamrani.

A quick recap of that shooting. Back in December of last year, Alshamrani walked onto a naval air station in Pensacola, Florida at around 7:00 am. Armed with a 9mm Glock handgun and several magazines of ammunition, Alshamrani roamed two floors of the building and opened fire, killing three and injuring eight more. About an hour after the shooting began, Alshamrani was shot and killed by Escambia County sheriff deputies.

On January 13, 2020, the FBI officially categorized the shooting an alleged act of terror, and suspected it was motivated by, jihadist ideology. From there, a full-blown investigation was launched attempting to discover any link between the gunman and larger terrorist groups. Central to that investigation were the contents of two phones an iPhone 5 and an iPhone 7 Plus which Alshamrani had on him during the time of the attack. Both were locked behind a passcode.

In a series of events that would eerily resemble the response to the 2015 San Bernardino shooting, FBI officials asked Apple to step in and unlock the phones. As was the case then, Apple refused, saying they do not possess the ability to bypass their phones local encryption even if they wanted to.

Both of the phones according to Wired, were badly damaged during the shooting and it was initially unclear whether or not any of their contents could be received. Eventually, after weeks of tinkering, the FBI managed to power on and unlock both phones, but no thanks to Apple. Heres FBI Director Ray explaining the situation.

We canvassed every partner out there and every company that might have had a solution to access these phones. None did, Wray said. So we did it ourselves. Unfortunately the technique that we developed is not a fix for our broader Apple problem. Its a pretty limited application.

In varying press conferences and interviews, both Wray and Attorney General Barr blasted into Apple claiming they refused to help law enforcement. But thats not exactly accurate. According to Recode, Apple did provide the FBI additional materials, going as far as to provide them with iCloud backups of Alshamranis phones. The company stopped short of agreeing to create a supposed back door for law enforcement to bypass encryption, citing the same concerns it had back in 2016.

It is because we take our responsibility to national security so seriously that we do not believe in the creation of a backdoor one which will make every device vulnerable to bad actors who threaten our national security and the data security of our customers, Apple said this week in a statement sent to Wired. There is no such thing as a backdoor just for the good guys, and the American people do not have to choose between weakening encryption and effective investigations.

That argument fell on deaf ears within the US government. Following the announcement of the FBIs successful iPhone cracking, Barr said he was tired of working with Apple and called for legislative solutions to force Apple to comply in future cases.

The bottom line: Our national security cannot remain in the hands of big corporations who put dollars over lawful access and public safety, Barr said. The time has come for a legislative solution.

While back in 2016 the FBIs main point of contention was a potential inability to bypass iPhone encryption, the main issue now revolves around time and financial cost. During his press conferences, FBI director Wray criticized Apple for supposedly costing the agency valuable time time he claims which let co-conspirators delete evidence.

Public servants, already swamped with important things to do to protect the American people and toiling through a pandemic, with all the risk and hardship that entails had to spend all that time just to access the evidence we got court-authorized search warrants for months ago, Wray said.

And even though the FBI did manage to break into the phone, they are still demanding backdoors into phones because they claim their technique may not work in future cases.

The technique that we developed is not a fix for our broader Apple problem; its of pretty limited application, Wray said.

While its surely frustrating for law enforcement to jump through extra hurdles to gather information, most of the governments rationale for requiring Apple to install backdoors into all its devices fails to hold up under security. For one thing, its unclear why these particular phones in questions were difficult to crack in the first place.

As Chris Welch explains in The Verge, both of the devices here are older models with known vulnerabilities out there making them susceptible to passcode breaking. Several major companies, (most notably Cellebrite) claim they can break the passcodes of any iPhone and have been assisting the FBI for years. Why it took weeks to crack an iPhone 5, which is nearly a decade old (thats Flinstone car in tech years) remains bafflingly unclear.

Its also telling that the government has shifted its language away from saying they cant unlock the phones, to now saying they cant unlock them quickly. The goal post keeps shifting, but the central issue remains the same: any full-scale backdoor would subvert privacy, not just for criminals, but for the billions of innocent people using smartphones every day.

This all follows a familiar trend as ACLU staff attorney Brett Max Kaufman told me in an emailed statement.

Every time theres a traumatic event requiring investigation into digital devices, the Justice Department loudly claims that it needs backdoors to encryption, and then quietly announces it actually found a way to access information without threatening the security and privacy of the entire world. The boy who cried wolf has nothing on the agency that cried encryption.

The timing of the governments announcement is telling here. The House of Representatives is getting ready to vote on a controversial new bill called the EARN IT ACT. While carefully avoiding using the word, encryption, the EARN IT ACT would grant Attorney General Barr the ability to compel tech companies and service providers to provide backdoors into devices.

The bill masquerades as an attempt to reign in child exploitation online, but as multiple writers and privacy advocates have expounded on ad nauseam, the bills purported solution would jeopardize the privacy of everyone who owns a phone, not just child predators. Its no exaggeration to say that if the EARN IT ACT passes, it would represent the most severe invasion of American civil liberties since the Patriot Act.

For decades, encryption has been a cat and mouse game between personal privacy and national security. While it would be one thing if standard encryption was exponentially evolving without any checks, the recent FBI example is clear evidence proving the contrary. The government can break into iPhones and it is getting better and better at it. While private companies shouldnt be able to prevent law enforcement from doing their jobs, they shouldnt be compelled to make investigations a walk in the park either. If the price for greater universal privacy protections means police need to spend extra hours doing police work, then so be it.

Read more here:
Why the Department of Justice Keeps Asking Apple to Unlock iPhones - Medium

Starting to look at email security. Looking for guidance – Encryption Methods and Programs – BleepingComputer

It's going to be difficult to have all of those features.

Protonmail is kind of the go-to, and it is free. When the recipient tries to read it, it will launch a new page for them to log in to. It's so secure that you can't even search your own e-mail. But it does ask you to integrate existing contacts, which I don't like (you can always tell it no, but still). If you get your contacts to sign up for ProtonMail, you may be able to exchange e-mails without a password and still have end-to-end encryption.

Here is one option to consider:

https://www.startmail.com/en/

The reason that I recommend this service is because I know some of the people involved. Granted, it has been 15 or 16 years, but I have spoken to these people in person before StartMail was even a concept. One of the founders was co-author of a book called "SpyChips," which chronicled some of the dangers to our security and privacy by RFID chips. Unlike ProtonMail, your mail is searchable. IMAP is disabled by default. You can encrypt and sign the e-mail if you want - you have total choice on whether the e-mail is sent encrypted or not. You will have to find a secure way to transmit the password to your intended recipient. It is $60 a year whether you pick the personal or professional plan has the most features, but limits you to 1 email per year - the professional plan. It doesn't launch another webpage when the recipient opens the mail like Protonmail does.

Here is the latest PC Magazine review:https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/startmail?test_uuid=03GdTca9yYczB0udADO47Ac&test_variant=b- they don't provide details like they used to.

You can check your local yellowpages.com for email service providers and call around first to see what security features they offer. You would have a less-global email server. Most of the providers in my area have gone out of business, and they tend to be expensive, but could be a good option depending on what features they offer. Some of these companies can advise you on ways to set up your own email server at home, but that is a lot of work.

Originally posted here:
Starting to look at email security. Looking for guidance - Encryption Methods and Programs - BleepingComputer

Global Cloud Encryption Technology Market Projected to Reach USD XX.XX billion by 2025- Gemalto, Sophos, Symantec, SkyHigh Networks, Netskope etc. -…

The study on Global Cloud Encryption Technology Market , offers deep insights about the Cloud Encryption Technology market covering all the crucial aspects of the market. Moreover, the report provides historical information with future forecast over the forecast period. Some of the important aspects analyzed in the report includes market share, production, key regions, revenue rate as well as key players. This Cloud Encryption Technology report also provides the readers with detailed figures at which the Cloud Encryption Technology market was valued in the historical year and its expected growth in upcoming years. Besides, analysis also forecasts the CAGR at which the Cloud Encryption Technology is expected to mount and major factors driving markets growth. This Cloud Encryption Technology market was accounted for USD xxx million in the historical year and is estimated to reach at USD xxx million by the end of the year 2025..

This study covers following key players:GemaltoSophosSymantecSkyHigh NetworksNetskope

Request a sample of this report @ https://www.orbismarketreports.com/sample-request/82099?utm_source=Pooja

To analyze the global Cloud Encryption Technology market the analysis methods used are SWOT analysis and PESTEL analysis. To identify what makes the business stand out and to take the chance to gain advantage from these findings, SWOT analysis is used by marketers. Whereas PESTEL analysis is the study concerning Economic, Technological, legal political, social, environmental matters. For the analysis of market on the terms of research strategies, these techniques are helpful.It consists of the detailed study of current market trends along with the past statistics. The past years are considered as reference to get the predicted data for the forecasted period. Various important factors such as market trends, revenue growth patterns market shares and demand and supply are included in almost all the market research report for every industry. It is very important for the vendors to provide customers with new and improved product/ services in order to gain their loyalty. The up-to-date, complete product knowledge, end users, industry growth will drive the profitability and revenue. Cloud Encryption Technology report studies the current state of the market to analyze the future opportunities and risks.

Access Complete Report @ https://www.orbismarketreports.com/global-cloud-encryption-technology-market-growth-analysis-by-trends-and-forecast-2019-2025?utm_source=Pooja

Market segment by Type, the product can be split into SolutionServices

Market segment by Application, split into BFSIHealthcare and LifesciencesMedia and EntertainmentRetail and E commerceAutomotive and ManufacturingIT and Telecom

For the study of the Cloud Encryption Technology market it is very important the past statistics. The report uses past data in the prediction of future data. The keyword market has its impact all over the globe. On global level Cloud Encryption Technology industry is segmented on the basis of product type, applications, and regions. It also focusses on market dynamics, Cloud Encryption Technology growth drivers, developing market segments and the market growth curve is offered based on past, present and future market data. The industry plans, news, and policies are presented at a global and regional level.

Some Major TOC Points:1 Report Overview2 Global Growth Trends3 Market Share by Key Players4 Breakdown Data by Type and ApplicationContinued

For Enquiry before buying report @ https://www.orbismarketreports.com/enquiry-before-buying/82099?utm_source=Pooja

About Us : With unfailing market gauging skills, has been excelling in curating tailored business intelligence data across industry verticals. Constantly thriving to expand our skill development, our strength lies in dedicated intellectuals with dynamic problem solving intent, ever willing to mold boundaries to scale heights in market interpretation.

Contact Us : Hector CostelloSenior Manager Client Engagements4144N Central Expressway,Suite 600, Dallas,Texas 75204, U.S.A.Phone No.: USA: +1 (972)-362-8199 | IND: +91 895 659 5155

View post:
Global Cloud Encryption Technology Market Projected to Reach USD XX.XX billion by 2025- Gemalto, Sophos, Symantec, SkyHigh Networks, Netskope etc. -...

Impact of Covid-19 on Cloud Encryption Technology Market is Expected to Grow at an active CAGR by Forecast to 2025 | Top Players Gemalto, Sophos,…

Industry Overview ofCloud Encryption Technology Market:The research report titled, Cloud Encryption Technology has adopted a systematic way to evaluate the dynamics of the overall market. It gives a definite study comprising a top to bottom research on the markets growth drivers, challenges, threats, and potential lucrative opportunities, with a key focus on global. In a chapter-wise format, the report assesses the demand and supply trends witnessed in the overall market, complete with important insights and graphical representation. An in-depth investment feasibility analysis and market attractiveness analysis is provided in the report, which makes it a miscellaneous document for players operating in the worldwide market.

Understand the influence of COVID-19 on the Cloud Encryption Technology Market Size with our analysts monitoring the situation across the globe.

The novel COVID-19 pandemic has put the world on a standstill, affecting major operations, leading to an industrial catastrophe. This report presented by Garner Insights contains a thorough analysis of the pre and post pandemic market scenarios. This report covers all the recent development and changes recorded during the COVID-19 outbreak..

Access PDF Sample Copy of the Report, With 30 mins free consultation! Click [emailprotected]https://garnerinsights.com/Global-Cloud-Encryption-Technology-Market-Size-Status-and-Forecast-2019-2025#request-sample

The research report additionally provides crucial data about the Cloud Encryption Technology market overview, scope, and future viewpoint. The report additionally speaks about the market dynamics and the competitive landscape of the worldwide Cloud Encryption Technology market for the mentioned forecast period of 2018 to 2025. The report is the consequence of an in-depth market research carried out with the assistance of the industry specialists. The report likewise gives data the key market players plying their trade in the global market.

The Global Cloud Encryption Technology Market research report displays the market size, status, share, production, cost analysis, and market value with the forecast period 2018-2025. Other than that, upstream raw materials, downstream demand analysis, consumption volume, and the market share by segments and sub-segments have also been discussed. The research methodology of the market is based on both primary as well as secondary research data sources. It commits different factors affecting Cloud Encryption Technology industry such as market environment, different policies of the government, historical data and market trends, technological advancements, forthcoming innovations, market risk factors, market restraints, and obstacles in the industry.

Major Key Players of the Cloud Encryption Technology Market are:

Gemalto, Sophos, Symantec, SkyHigh Networks, Netskope,

Major Types of Cloud Encryption Technology covered are:

Solution,Services,

Major Applications of Cloud Encryption Technology covered are:

BFSI,Healthcare and Lifesciences,Media and Entertainment,Retail and E commerce,Automotive and Manufacturing,IT and Telecom,

To understand the competitive scenario of the market, an analysis of the Porters Five Forces model has also been included for the market. The research also includes a market attractiveness analysis, in which all the segments are highlighted on the basis of their market share, size, growth rate, and overall attractiveness. This market research is conducted leveraging the data sourced from the primary and secondary research team of industry professionals as well as the in-house databases. Research analysts and consultants cooperate with the key organizations of the concerned domain to verify every value of data exists in this report.

The answers to the following key questions can be found in the report:What are the key reasons to focus on this particular market?

Get Discount on this Report: https://garnerinsights.com/Global-Cloud-Encryption-Technology-Market-Size-Status-and-Forecast-2019-2025#discount

The report magnifies Cloud Encryption Technology market competitors by exploring their newly adopted technological advancements, strategical and tactical business planning, business expansions, acquisitions, partnerships, and new product launches that gives an absolute acuity of rivalry in the Cloud Encryption Technology market.The report implements various analytical tools including SWOT analysis, Porters Five Forces analysis, and Capacity Utilization analysis to render a validated evaluation of the Cloud Encryption Technology market. It also comprehends futuristic business opportunities, scope as well as market threats, challenges, barriers, obstacles, and regulatory framework to give a profound idea about the Cloud Encryption Technology market that aids reader to form own business stratagem accordingly to meet their resolved business goals.

Contact Us:Kevin ThomasContact No: +1 513 549 5911 (US)+44 203 318 2846 (UK)[emailprotected]

See original here:
Impact of Covid-19 on Cloud Encryption Technology Market is Expected to Grow at an active CAGR by Forecast to 2025 | Top Players Gemalto, Sophos,...

The Samsung Galaxy S20 Tactical Edition is a reinforced S20 with two layers of encryption and night vision mode for the army – Explica

Samsung is prone to perform specific modifications of your phones phones that allow them to fit into very specific sectors. Proof of this are the Active models, reinforced to be more resistant and usually compatible with very few operators. In fact, they are frequently held in the United States under the AT&T umbrella, without ever stepping on foreign soil.

Now, Koreans have modified their Samsung Galaxy S20, one of this seasons catalog leaders, to make it a Samsung Galaxy S20 Tactical Edition ideal, and apparently exclusive, for different government agencies in the United States. In principle, the Department of Defense is confirmed among them, although we do not know if it will also work far from the North American borders.

Glancing at the phone, we can see that it comes accompanied by a ultra-resistant case that makes us think that it is prepared for extreme tasks. And the manufacturer himself tells it, since he turns his S20 into an ideal phone for tactical operations on the ground, although the modifications are not only in terms of its external appearance. The software also arrives adapted.

In addition to all the functionality on board the S20, the new Tactical Edition model has a compatibility mode with the DualDAR architecture of the United States Army, adding two layers of encryption to the software itself to make it virtually inaccessible to third parties. A completely spy-proof phone, if it can really exist.

Along with that extra level of security added to the phone, the Galaxy S20 Tactical Edition features a unlocking mode in landscape position to be able to activate the phone carrying it attached to the belt or to any arm support device. It also has a system that Samsung calls private SIM, a new level of security to protect the devices card from external computer attacks, and it is also compatible with the CRBS radio system, used in tactical and combat missions.

But the thing does not stop there since this Galaxy S20 Tactical Edition by Samsung includes a night vision mode and also what Samsung calls Stealth Mode, an original way to call the airplane mode of the phone, although it probably has more than one advanced feature that differentiates it from it. The Galaxy S20 modified to become the Tactical Edition is the version with the Snapdragon 865 and it has 12GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage. The rest of the characteristics are identical to those of the normal Galaxy S20.

More information | Samsung

ShareThe Samsung Galaxy S20 Tactical Edition is a reinforced S20 with two layers of encryption and night vision mode for the army

Read this article:
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Tactical Edition is a reinforced S20 with two layers of encryption and night vision mode for the army - Explica

How Coronavirus is Impacting Open Source Software Market Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin, Industry Analysis & Forecast by…

In 2018, the market size of Open Source Software Market is million US$ and it will reach million US$ in 2025, growing at a CAGR of from 2018; while in China, the market size is valued at xx million US$ and will increase to xx million US$ in 2025, with a CAGR of xx% during forecast period.

The report on the Open Source Software market provides a birds eye view of the current proceeding within the Open Source Software market. Further, the report also takes into account the impact of the novel COVID-19 pandemic on the Open Source Software market and offers a clear assessment of the projected market fluctuations during the forecast period. The different factors that are likely to impact the overall dynamics of the Open Source Software market over the forecast period (2019-2029) including the current trends, growth opportunities, restraining factors, and more are discussed in detail in the market study.

Get Free Sample PDF (including COVID19 Impact Analysis, full TOC, Tables and Figures) of Market Report @ https://www.researchmoz.com/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=2637151&source=atm

This study presents the Open Source Software Market production, revenue, market share and growth rate for each key company, and also covers the breakdown data (production, consumption, revenue and market share) by regions, type and applications. Open Source Software history breakdown data from 2014 to 2018, and forecast to 2025.

For top companies in United States, European Union and China, this report investigates and analyzes the production, value, price, market share and growth rate for the top manufacturers, key data from 2014 to 2018.

In global Open Source Software market, the following companies are covered:

The key players covered in this studyIntelEpsonIBMTranscendOracleAcquiaOpenTextAlfrescoAstaroRethinkDBCanonicalClearCenterCleversafeCompiereContinuent

Market segment by Type, the product can be split intoSharewareBundled SoftwareBSD(Berkeley Source Distribution)Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)Market segment by Application, split intoBMForumphpBBPHPWind

Market segment by Regions/Countries, this report coversNorth AmericaEuropeChinaJapanSoutheast AsiaIndiaCentral & South America

The study objectives of this report are:To analyze global Open Source Software status, future forecast, growth opportunity, key market and key players.To present the Open Source Software development in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia, India and Central & South America.To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their development plan and strategies.To define, describe and forecast the market by type, market and key regions.

In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Open Source Software are as follows:History Year: 2015-2019Base Year: 2019Estimated Year: 2020Forecast Year 2020 to 2026For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2019 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.

Do You Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry [emailprotected] https://www.researchmoz.com/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=2637151&source=atm

The content of the study subjects, includes a total of 15 chapters:

Chapter 1, to describe Open Source Software product scope, market overview, market opportunities, market driving force and market risks.

Chapter 2, to profile the top manufacturers of Open Source Software , with price, sales, revenue and global market share of Open Source Software in 2017 and 2018.

Chapter 3, the Open Source Software competitive situation, sales, revenue and global market share of top manufacturers are analyzed emphatically by landscape contrast.

Chapter 4, the Open Source Software breakdown data are shown at the regional level, to show the sales, revenue and growth by regions, from 2014 to 2018.

Chapter 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, to break the sales data at the country level, with sales, revenue and market share for key countries in the world, from 2014 to 2018.

You can Buy This Report from Here @ https://www.researchmoz.com/checkout?rep_id=2637151&licType=S&source=atm

Chapter 10 and 11, to segment the sales by type and application, with sales market share and growth rate by type, application, from 2014 to 2018.

Chapter 12, Open Source Software market forecast, by regions, type and application, with sales and revenue, from 2018 to 2024.

Chapter 13, 14 and 15, to describe Open Source Software sales channel, distributors, customers, research findings and conclusion, appendix and data source.

Excerpt from:
How Coronavirus is Impacting Open Source Software Market Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin, Industry Analysis & Forecast by...

Features | Tome On The Range | Data, Driven: Wendy Liu’s Abolish Silicon Valley – The Quietus

Wendy Liu epitomises the zeal of a convert. While once she chased the dreams of excessive wealth through the mediums of new technology and private equity, now she critiques the tech industrys propagation of capitalisms worst habits. Abolish Silicon Valley is the long form result of her work as an agitative tech journalist and analyst of startup discourse. Its a breezy, accessible entry point for people curious about new leftist politics which concludes with a series of policy proposals for a post-neoliberal world, but its strength lies in Lius recounting of her experiences within the tent shes now pissing into.

For the most part, Abolish Silicon Valley is a memoir which tracks Lius personal history from her teens to her late 20s. It begins during her early years as an incognito member of the open source software movement. Online cultures rebellious streak and the possibility to effect change through digital systems is what draws her to the industry. Keen to focus on software, she attends Canadas McGill University where she undertakes a joint degree in physics and computer science.

Silicon Valley itself has a somewhat negligible physical presence in the narrative. The Valley is mostly portrayed as a mindset which can be traced in almost every facet of contemporary American life. For much of the narrative, Liu is a semi-outsider, frustrated by the seeming randomness of wealth and opportunities afforded to peers. She goes to the region mostly for inconsequential meetings and, while still at university, to intern at Google. During her internship she experiences intense boredom at work followed by organised fun at parties hosted by the likes of Uber. Its quite unsettling to read how the politics of meritocracy and platitudinous marketing syntax are deployed within corporate cultures which cast themselves as familial but act like mafioso.

A majority of the book finds Liu recounting her days as part of a motley crew of university friends dedicated to the startup they cofounded. What exactly this data-driven business was meant to be producing remains unclear, even for Liu it seems. She says a few times that the service it was providing was boring, but the technical problem was captivating. The startup dissolves after abortive attempts to obtain either the clientele or the financial backing to make the project a financial success. By this point, Liu has already been keeping a note of the inconsistencies of the world around her, from what she perceives as the unfair treatment of manual labouring staff at Google HQ to the critiques of capitalism which seeped through the gaps of the industrys echo chamber.

The brief eighteen pages which outline A New Industrial Model, full of passionate ideas about democratising workplaces and nationalising tech infrastructure, are disorientingly breathless. Liu admits that there is a utopianism embodied by these pages, but the problem is not that any of her positions are unarguable, more that this feels like a conclusion to a different book. There is a gap between Lius first person retelling of her experiences in the tech industry and the concluding meta critique of the economic structure of the United States of America. I can intuit how one leads to the other, but, as Liu says herself, its still hard to piece together the steps that got me from where I was to where I am now. She tantalises the reader by mentioning books and ideas which transformed her, and the masters degree in inequality she obtained from the London School of Economics we mightve benefited from being taken on that journey with her in more detail.

Her confidence is persuasive. Liu doesnt make ideological concessions for the people shes attempting to generate a class consciousness within. (She does also say that she is not here to change minds, which points towards a wider malaise about the possibility of triumphing tribalism.) She highlights that the idea that entrepreneurs are the best innovators is misconceived, a point that economist Mark Blyth has also been persuasively arguing over the last few years. And if, after reading this book, someone needs more proof that meritocracy is a fallacy I heartily recommend Daniel Markovitss deconstruction of the term.

Lius book treats the USA as its zero point, and thus its main drawback as a political text is that it pays little attention to the exploitation of land and people in Asia, South America and Africa which the tech industry relies on. Her criticisms of the industrys gendered imbalances appear crucial in the opening chapters, but this train of thought isnt fleshed out and feels like a lost thread. This is another moment where the book could have benefited from some third person detail, along the lines of Liu's own insightful explanation of GDPRs explainability clause in relation to algorithms, for example.

Early on, she states that this is the book she wishes shed had before entering the industry. This is authorial proof that Abolish Silicon Valley is best approached as an insightful textbook for young adult readers who are feeling the pressure of graduation, apprenticeships and internships. This is a category currently dominated by self help guides such as Katharine Brookss You Majored in What? which do little other than normalise careerist impulses. Lius strongest point, that the best route to overcoming the pressure of individuation are forms of collectivity, is the perfect counterweight to this zeitgeist. It's worth having on the shelf to afford aspirational youth the realisation that it is better to work to live, rather than live to work, before its too late.

Abolish Silicon Valley by Wendy Liu is published by Repeater Books

Original post:
Features | Tome On The Range | Data, Driven: Wendy Liu's Abolish Silicon Valley - The Quietus

Jeanna Matthews Promoted to Full Professor at Clarkson University – Clarkson University News

Jeanna N. Matthews

Clarkson University President Tony Collins has announced that Jeanna N. Matthews has been promoted from associate professor to full professor of computer science in the School of Arts & Sciences. Promotion to professor is considered to be virtually the highest honor that a university can bestow upon its faculty.

Her current research focuses on securing societal decision-making processes and supporting the rights of individuals in a world of automation. She received a 2018-2019 Brown Institute Magic Grant to research differences in DNA software programs used in the criminal justice system.

Other research interests include operating systems, virtualization, computer networking, computer security, file systems, cloud computing, distributed systems, storage systems, open source software development, and database systems.

Matthews is also an affiliate at Data and Society, an independent nonprofit research organization that studies the social implications of data and automation, producing original research to ground informed, evidence-based public debate about emerging technology. She was a Fellow there in 2017-2018.

Matthews is the author of Computer Networking Internet Protocols in Action; and the co-author of Running Xen: A Hands-On Guide to the Art of Virtualization and a chapter in High Performance Mass Storage and Parallel I/O: Technologies and Applications.

She has published work in numerous journals on a broad range of systems topics from virtualization and cloud computing to social media security and distributed file systems. She has also delivered many conferences, technical and educational presentations.

She has been a four-time presenter at DEF CON, one of the world's largest and most notable hacker conventions, on topics including security vulnerabilities in virtual environments (2015 and 2016), adversarial testing of criminal justice software (2018) and trolling (2018).

A senior member of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), she is an ACM Distinguished Speaker, founding co-chair of the ACM Technology Policy Subcommittee on Artificial Intelligence and Algorithm Accountability, and a member of the ACM Technology Policy Committee.

She is a member of the ACM Council (2015-present), and has served as chair of the ACM Special Interest Group Governing Board (2016-2018), chair of the ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems (SIGOPS) from 2011 to 2015. She was a Fulbright Specialist in Colombia in 2019.

Matthews received her Ph.D. and master of science degrees in computer science from the University of California at Berkeley, her bachelor of science in mathematics and computer science from Ohio State University and her bachelor of arts in Spanish from SUNY Potsdam.

Matthews was previously an assistant professor at Cornell University.

See the original post here:
Jeanna Matthews Promoted to Full Professor at Clarkson University - Clarkson University News

Why Have Cryptocurrency Payments Failed to Take Off So Far? – Cointelegraph

Paying with crypto has long been at the center of the discussions of why cryptocurrencies exist and why they are useful.

But despite promising growth and excitement during cryptos bullish phases, payments with crypto still remain a fringe niche at best. Cointelegraph interviewed both merchants and industry leaders to find out why.

As a general rule, crypto payments are used where they make sense. This remains the case for darknet markets, which according to a January 2020 Chainalysis report continue posting new volume highs.

Source: chainalysis.com

Despite their tiny share of the overall crypto activity, marketplaces selling primarily illegal goods simply cannot use traditional payment mechanisms. Nevertheless, these markets pale in comparison to the traditional cash-based drug trade, whose volume is estimated at approximately $400 billion yearly.

In legal settings, Crypto.coms CEO Kris Marszalek told Cointelegraph what kinds of products see meaningful usage of crypto:

Its still mostly crypto stuff. So we've got Travala, which is the travel merchant that accepts crypto. Ledger.com [...] when we launched on day one we were doing similar volume to Mastercard.

Marszalek cited figures from leading crypto payment providers BitPay and Coinbase Commerce, which report yearly volumes of $1 billion and $200 million, respectively.

The numbers are very small, Marszalek said bluntly.

Indeed, compared to Visas figure of $2 trillion for a single quarter in 2018, crypto payments have a long way to go.

Marszalek identified a series of issues that are preventing crypto payments adoption, with lack of trust one of them:

For the vast majority of the merchants out there, just like for the vast majority of retail banking users out there, crypto is still something unknown, something they still didnt learn to trust.

Peko Wan, the chief ecosystem officer of crypto point of sale provider Pundi X, told Cointelegraph a similar story:

For the mainstream, the general perception toward crypto are complicated to use or risky to own cryptos.

This attitude is reflected by a U.K.-based business owner operating a recreational plane simulator, whom Cointelegraph interviewed. Despite adding the crypto payment option, they said that no one has ever paid using crypto. They further said to be wary of all cryptos as there are so many scams out there.

Even among crypto enthusiasts, payments are a low priority use case. This is best exemplified by the issuance of WBTC for Ethereum decentralized finance, which is now more than double the size of the entire Lightning Network.

Marszalek believes that part of it is the chicken and egg problem, which limits the amount of merchants accepting crypto:

Because if you only have 50 million people in crypto globally, merchants have very little incentive to deploy this, unless they are in a business that is covering a similar demographic as crypto.

One of the biggest problems of crypto payments is the volatility of even the most established assets. Marszalek believes that most people only know about cryptos price swings, which is not really conducive to merchant adoption, he added.

Furthermore, the premise of many crypto payment providers is that merchants can completely avoid exposure to cryptos volatility.

Marszalek believes that stablecoins are super powerful for e-commerce transactions, citing their speed and cost, and sees Crypto.com eventually creating its own stablecoin as part of its vision of a complete ecosystem.

Claudio Barros, the Portugal-based owner of DBR Electronica and one of merchants using Pundi Xs solutions, believes that stablecoins would be a great addition to the ecosystem:

Any improvement in stability of coins will be a benefit, we need a range from pegged coins to super volatile coins to cater for different needs.

Crypto is competing both with established e-money systems like WeChat in China, and novel technologies like Calibra. Marszalek believes that it is better than either of those, both due to better performance and better privacy.

Marszalek, who is based in Hong Kong, personally witnessed how the cashless transition in China left him unable to pay in a Beijing restaurant, as Hong Kong WeChat does not work in mainland China. Either way, WeChats extreme level of surveillance makes him feel uncomfortable.

Wan also pointed to developing countries, noting:

For the past two years, we also observed that in the countries where the local currency has decreased over time [people] are more aware of crypto or interested in having cryptos.

For Crypto.com, payments are just at the beginning of the beginning, Marszalek said. But he strongly believes that it is the companys most important product, which will take our overall platform to a hundred million users in five years.

For crypto in general, the same statements could likely be made as well.

Continued here:
Why Have Cryptocurrency Payments Failed to Take Off So Far? - Cointelegraph