Free/open-source software the source availability model used by free and open-source software (FOSS) and closed source are two approaches to the distribution of software.
Under the closed-source model source code is not released to the public. Closed-source software is maintained by a team who produces their product in a compiled-executable state, which is what the market is allowed access to. Microsoft, the owner and developer of Windows and Microsoft Office, along with other major software companies, have long been proponents of this business model, although in August 2010, Microsoft interoperability general manager Jean Paoli said Microsoft "loves open source" and its anti-open-source position was a mistake.[1]
The FOSS model allows for able users to view and modify a product's source code, but most of such code is not in the public domain. Common advantages cited by proponents for having such a structure are expressed in terms of trust, acceptance, teamwork and quality.[2]
A non-free license is used to limit what free software movement advocates consider to be the essential freedoms. A license, whether providing open-source code or not, that does not stipulate the "four software freedoms",[3] are not considered "free" by the free software movement. A closed source license is one that limits only the availability of the source code. By contrast a copyleft license claims to protect the "four software freedoms" by explicitly granting them and then explicitly prohibiting anyone to redistribute the package or reuse the code in it to make derivative works without including the same licensing clauses. Some licenses grant the four software freedoms but allow redistributors to remove them if they wish. Such licenses are sometimes called permissive software licenses.[4] An example of such a license is the FreeBSD License which allows derivative software to be distributed as non-free or closed source, as long as they give credit to the original designers.
A misconception that is often made by both proponents and detractors of FOSS is that it cannot be capitalized.[5] FOSS can and has been commercialized by companies such as Red Hat, Canonical, Mozilla, Google, IBM, Novell, Sun/Oracle, VMware and others.[6]
The primary business model for closed-source software involves the use of constraints on what can be done with the software and the restriction of access to the original source code.[6] This can result in a form of imposed artificial scarcity on a product that is otherwise very easy to copy and redistribute. The result is that an end-user is not actually purchasing software, but purchasing the right to use the software. To this end, the source code to closed-source software is considered a trade secret by its manufacturers.
FOSS methods, on the other hand, typically do not limit the use of software in this fashion. Instead, the revenue model is based mainly on support services. Red Hat Inc. and Canonical Ltd. are such companies that give its software away freely, but charge for support services. The source code of the software is usually given away, and pre-compiled binary software frequently accompanies it for convenience. As a result, the source code can be freely modified. However, there can be some license-based restrictions on re-distributing the software. Generally, software can be modified and re-distributed for free, as long as credit is given to the original manufacturer of the software. In addition, FOSS can generally be sold commercially, as long as the source-code is provided. There are a wide variety of free software licenses that define how a program can be used, modified, and sold commercially (see GPL, LGPL, and BSD-type licenses). FOSS may also be funded through donations.
A software philosophy that combines aspects of FOSS and proprietary software is open core software, or commercial open source software. Despite having received criticism from some proponents of FOSS,[7] it has exhibited marginal success. Examples of open core software include MySQL and VirtualBox. The MINIX operating system used to follow this business model, but came under the full terms of the BSD license after the year 2000.
This model has proved somewhat successful, as witnessed in the Linux community. There are numerous Linux distributions available, but a great many of them are simply modified versions of some previous version. For example, Fedora Linux, Mandriva Linux, and PCLinuxOS are all derivatives of an earlier product, Red Hat Linux. In fact, Red Hat Enterprise Linux is itself a derivative of Fedora Linux. This is an example of one vendor creating a product, allowing a third-party to modify the software, and then creating a tertiary product based on the modified version. All of the products listed above are currently produced by software service companies.
Operating systems built on the Linux kernel are available for a wider range of processor architectures than Microsoft Windows, including PowerPC and SPARC. None of these can match the sheer popularity of the x86 architecture, nevertheless they do have significant numbers of users; Windows remains unavailable for these alternative architectures, although there have been such ports of it in the past.
The most obvious complaint against FOSS revolves around the fact that making money through some traditional methods, such as the sale of the use of individual copies and patent royalty payments, is much more difficult and sometimes impractical with FOSS. Moreover, FOSS has been considered damaging to the commercial software market, evidenced in documents released as part of the Microsoft Halloween documents leak.[8][9][10]
The cost of making a copy of a software program is essentially zero, so per-use fees are perhaps unreasonable for open-source software. At one time, open-source software development was almost entirely volunteer-driven, and although this is true for many small projects, many alternative funding streams have been identified and employed for FOSS:
Increasingly, FOSS is developed by commercial organizations. In 2004, Andrew Morton noted that 37,000 of the 38,000 recent patches in the Linux kernel were created by developers directly paid to develop the Linux kernel. Many projects, such as the X Window System and Apache, have had commercial development as a primary source of improvements since their inception. This trend has accelerated over time.[citation needed]
There are some[who?] who counter that the commercialization of FOSS is a poorly devised business model because commercial FOSS companies answer to parties with opposite agendas. On one hand commercial FOSS companies answer to volunteers developers, who are difficult to keep on a schedule, and on the other hand they answer to shareholders, who are expecting a return on their investment. Often FOSS development is not on a schedule and therefore it may have an adverse effect on a commercial FOSS company releasing software on time.[11]
Gary Hamel counters this claim by saying that quantifying who or what is innovative is impossible.[12]
The implementation of compatible FOSS replacements for proprietary software is encouraged by the Free Software Foundation to make it possible for their users to use FOSS instead of proprietary software, for example they have listed GNU Octave, an API-compatible replacement for MATLAB, as one of their high priority projects. In the past this list contained free binary compatible Java and CLI implementations, like GNU Classpath and DotGNU. Thus even "derivative" developments are important in the opinion of many people from FOSS. However, there is no quantitative analysis, if FOSS is less innovative than proprietary software, since there are derivative/re-implementing proprietary developments, too.
Some of the largest well-known FOSS projects are either legacy code (e.g., FreeBSD or Apache) developed a long time ago independently of the free software movement, or by companies like Netscape (which open-sourced its code with the hope that they could compete better), or by companies like MySQL which use FOSS to lure customers for its more expensive licensed product. However, it is notable that most of these projects have seen major or even complete rewrites (in the case of the Mozilla and Apache 2 code, for example) and do not contain much of the original code.
Innovations have come, and continue to come, from the open-source world:
An analysis of the code of the FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris, and Windows operating system kernels looked for differences between code developed using open-source properties (the first two kernels) and proprietary code (the other two kernels). The study collected metrics in the areas of file organization, code structure, code style, the use of the C preprocessor, and data organization. The aggregate results indicate that across various areas and many different metrics, four systems developed using open- and closed-source development processes score comparably.[16]The study mentioned above is refuted by a study conducted by Coverity, Inc finding open source code to be of better quality.[17]
A study done on seventeen open-source and closed-source software showed that the number of vulnerabilities existing in a piece of software is not affected by the source availability model that it uses. The study used a very simple metrics of comparing the number of vulnerabilities between the open-source and closed-source software.[18] Another study was also done by a group of professors in Northern Kentucky University on fourteen open-source web applications written in PHP. The study measured the vulnerability density in the web applications and shown that some of them had increased vulnerability density, but some of them also had decreased vulnerability density.[19]
In its 2008 Annual Report, Microsoft stated that FOSS business models challenge its license-based software model and that the firms who use these business models do not bear the cost for their software development[clarification needed]. The company also stated in the report:[20][21]
Some of these [open source software] firms may build upon Microsoft ideas that we provide to them free or at low royalties in connection with our interoperability initiatives. To the extent open source software gains increasing market acceptance, our sales, revenue and operating margins may decline.Open source software vendors are devoting considerable efforts to developing software that mimics the features and functionality of our products, in some cases on the basis of technical specifications for Microsoft technologies that we make available. In response to competition, we are developing versions of our products with basic functionality that are sold at lower prices than the standard versions.
There are numerous business models for open source companies which can be found in the literature.[6]
Originally posted here:
Comparison of open-source and closed-source software
- Calls to Ban Open Source are Misguided and Dangerous - The New Stack - June 26th, 2024
- Delving the Risks and Rewards of the Open-Source Ecosystem - InformationWeek - June 26th, 2024
- Enhancing security through collaboration with the open-source community - Help Net Security - June 18th, 2024
- It's time to face the open source security problem - ITPro - June 18th, 2024
- Mistral AI just launched 'Codestral', its own competitor to Code Llama and GitHub Copilot and it's fluent in over 80 ... - ITPro - June 2nd, 2024
- Open-source cybersecurity could derail the internet as we know it - Quartz - May 15th, 2024
- Developer Experience Influenced by Open Source Culture - InfoQ.com - May 15th, 2024
- BLint: Open-source tool to check the security properties of your executables - Help Net Security - May 15th, 2024
- Modular Open-Sources Mojo: The Programming Language that Turns Python into a Beast - MarkTechPost - April 2nd, 2024
- Meet the 21-Year-Old Creator of Devika, the Indian Open Source Devin Alternative - Analytics India Magazine - April 2nd, 2024
- Is Open Source Under Threat or Primed to Go to the Next Level? - The New Stack - March 13th, 2024
- Where is Technology Headed in 2024? - Open Source For You - March 13th, 2024
- A Detailed Conversation on Open-Source AI Frameworks for MLOps Workflows and Projects - AiThority - March 5th, 2024
- Everything you need to know about GitHub's new push protection changes - ITPro - March 5th, 2024
- StarCoder 2 is a code-generating AI that runs on most GPUs - TechCrunch - March 5th, 2024
- Is the future of open source software at risk due to protestware? - Tech Xplore - February 25th, 2024
- Google unveils new family of open-source AI models called Gemma to take on Meta and othersdeciding open-source AI aint so bad after all - Fortune - February 25th, 2024
- Jim Zemlin and the Linux Foundation share not-so-secret open-source sauce - ZDNet - February 25th, 2024
- Open source vs closed source AI: What's the difference and why does it matter? - Euronews - February 25th, 2024
- Biden administration to debate whether all AI systems should be open-source or closed - Firstpost - February 25th, 2024
- Some Linkerd service mesh users will soon have to pay - TechTarget - February 25th, 2024
- A lone developer just open sourced a tool that could bring an end to Nvidia's AI hegemony AMD financed it for ... - TechRadar - February 25th, 2024
- Scoping Out the Software-Defined Vehicle: The Benefits of OTA Updates & Open Source - Embedded Computing Design - February 25th, 2024
- The importance and limitations of open source AI models - TechTarget - February 9th, 2024
- 15+ Popular Python IDEs in 2024: Choosing The Best One - Simplilearn - February 9th, 2024
- Balancing Innovation and Security: The Open-Source Conundrum - BNN Breaking - February 9th, 2024
- VCs and startups love open-source AI models but how will they make money? - Sifted - February 9th, 2024
- How better and cheaper software could save millions of dollars while improving Canada's health-care system - The Conversation Indonesia - February 9th, 2024
- Best of 2023: Are We Witnessing the End of Open Source? - DevOps.com - December 28th, 2023
- What comes after open source? Bruce Perens is working on it - The Register - December 28th, 2023
- 200 GB of GTA 5 source code is about to get leaked, making it an open source: Report - Sportskeeda - December 28th, 2023
- Never was so much owed by so many to so few - a look at the unheralded heroes of the open source world - TechRadar - December 28th, 2023
- Rockstar hit with another cyberattack, leaked GTA 5 source code reveal cancelled DLC plans - Times of India - December 28th, 2023
- What is open source software? - Android Police - December 20th, 2023
- Feds Warn Health Sector to Watch for Open-Source Threats - BankInfoSecurity.com - December 11th, 2023
- OpenTofu: Open-source alternative to Terraform - Help Net Security - December 11th, 2023
- AWS exec: 'Our understanding of open source has started to change' - The Register - December 11th, 2023
- Mark Jelic Rings in 40 Years Since the TEC-1 Launch with a New, Open Source, Upgraded TEC-1G SBC - Hackster.io - December 11th, 2023
- AI's future could be 'open-source' or closed. Tech giants are divided as they lobby regulators - Tech Xplore - December 11th, 2023
- Cyber Security Today, Nov. 24, 2023 A warning to tighten security on Kubernetes containers, and more - IT World Canada - November 25th, 2023
- This AI Paper Proposes ML-BENCH: A Novel Artificial Intelligence Approach Developed to Assess the Effectiveness of LLMs in Leveraging Existing... - November 25th, 2023
- Generative AI is a genuine breakthrough unlike most fads in tech: Zerodha CTO Kailash Nadh on the current waves in tech - The Hindu - October 27th, 2023
- Meet RedPajama: An AI Project to Create Fully Open-Source Large Language Models Beginning with the Release of a 1.2 Trillion Token Dataset -... - April 25th, 2023
- Hashtag Trending Apr.24th- Cybersecurity workers burnout; Code generated by ChatGPT and Googles Bard not very secure; Execs would want a robot to make... - April 25th, 2023
- This AI Project Brings Doodles to Life with Animation and Releases Annotated Dataset of Amateur Drawings - MarkTechPost - April 17th, 2023
- EU shares best practices with Ukrainian law enforcers on Open Source Intelligence and Criminal Analysis to - EIN News - April 8th, 2023
- 'I've never seen anything like this:' One of China's most popular apps has the ability to spy on its users, say experts - CNN - April 8th, 2023
- With Just ~20 Lines of Python Code, You can Do Retrieval Augmented GPT Based QA Using This Open Source Repository Called PrimeQA - MarkTechPost - March 5th, 2023
- Daily Crunch: Hundreds of Salesforce workers laid off in January just discovered they were out of work today - TechCrunch - February 7th, 2023
- Unlocking the power of Open AI: how to automate information extraction - The Hindu - February 7th, 2023
- Is composable business most essential technology trend to meet challenges of 2023 and beyond? - ComputerWeekly.com - January 30th, 2023
- Open Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com - January 22nd, 2023
- 529 Synonyms & Antonyms of OPEN - Merriam-Webster - January 22nd, 2023
- Open Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster - January 22nd, 2023
- Can Wazuh Become The Worlds Largest Open Source Cybersecurity Platform And IPO Without VC Funding? - Forbes - January 6th, 2023
- 8 Free/Open Source Code Review Tools for 2022 - SoftwareSuggest - December 28th, 2022
- Finding the next Log4j OpenSSFs Brian Behlendorf on pivoting to a risk-centred view of open source development - The Daily Swig - December 28th, 2022
- Nithin Kamath says FOSS is the 'pillar' on which Zerodha has been built. What is it? - Business Today - December 28th, 2022
- How Dogeliens Will Take Over the Metaverse Like Bitcoin and Stellar Took Over the Crypto World. - newsbtc.com - December 28th, 2022
- Intrinsic Buys Open Robotics' Commercial Arm, But Leaves ROS and Gazebo with the Foundation - Hackster.io - December 20th, 2022
- Open-source code is everywhere; GitHub expands security tools to help ... - December 20th, 2022
- Security Of Enterprise Code: What Companies Using Open-Source Software Should Know About Binary Code Verification - Forbes - December 20th, 2022
- Open Source - Apple Developer - December 12th, 2022
- Your Code of Conduct | Open Source Guides - December 12th, 2022
- Code of Conduct | Meta Open Source - Facebook - December 12th, 2022
- From the creator of Homebrew, Tea raises $8.9M to build a protocol that helps open source developers get paid - TechCrunch - December 12th, 2022
- Consortium of Japan partners successfully promote domestic production and cost reduction for 5G core technology, the basis for next-generation... - November 25th, 2022
- GitHub Vulnerability Allows Hackers to Hijack Thousands of Popular Open-Source Packages - CPO Magazine - November 17th, 2022
- GitHubs Octoverse report finds 97% of apps use open source software - VentureBeat - November 17th, 2022
- Microsoft sued for open-source piracy through GitHub Copilot - BleepingComputer - November 7th, 2022
- The White House Memorandum on Securing the Software Supply Chain: What It Means for Your Organization - Security Boulevard - November 7th, 2022
- First Timers Only - Get involved in Open Source and commit code to your ... - October 23rd, 2022
- List of free and open-source software packages - Wikipedia - October 23rd, 2022
- What is open source? - Red Hat - October 23rd, 2022
- Introducing Triton: Open-Source GPU Programming for Neural Networks - October 23rd, 2022
- Java 19 Brings New Patterns to Open Source Programming Language - October 23rd, 2022
- API series - OctoML: ML APIs need to take a lesson from their ancestors - ComputerWeekly.com - October 23rd, 2022
- Benefits of working with open source data quality solutions - TechRepublic - October 15th, 2022
- Microsoft's GitHub Copilot AI is making rapid progress. Here's how its human leader thinks about it - CNBC - October 15th, 2022
- NocoDB takes on Airtable with open source no-code platform that connects to production databases - TechCrunch - October 15th, 2022