MCU or DSP?: Graphics and Cryptography in Microchip’s New Microcontrollers – All About Circuits

The hardware inside microcontrollers is increasingly powerful and versatile. This is good, right?

When I started working with embedded systems, microcontrollers and DSPs were very different things. In fact, the first professional system that I was deeply involved in was a perfect example of the distinction: An 8051 microcontroller was used for housekeeping tasks and a test/debug RS-232 interface. A Texas Instruments DSP was used for intensive mathematical computations. The 8051 was programmed by a mechanical engineer, and the DSP was programmed by an electrical engineer who later became a system engineer. I dont know what this last sentence says about the MCU vs. DSP distinction, but maybe you can discover some hidden significance.

As microcontrollers become more powerful and incorporate additional dedicated hardware, the MCU and DSP categories become less relevant. Microchip is contributing to this trend with its PIC32MZ DA and CEC1702 microcontrollers, which incorporate advanced graphics capabilities and hardware cryptography, respectively. As one of the press releases points out, the PIC32MZ DA family breaks through perceived MCU graphics barriers. Just for the record, Im not making a value judgment here; you can call these parts whatever you want as far as Im concerned. When Im searching for a part I look at the specs, not the category, and I know which manufacturers make the processors that Im interested in.

However, as implied by the introduction to this article, I think it is worthwhile to consider the implications of microcontrollers that incorporate increasingly diverse and sophisticated functionality. There is always a trade-off: higher performance comes with design challenges such as stricter layout requirements, higher levels of firmware abstraction, or simply longer datasheets that are more intimidating for novices. There is perhaps some degree of risk in making microcontrollers increasingly unapproachable for those who dont have extensive experience in embedded design.

No one could deny that graphical displays or interfaces are essential aspects of modern electronic devices, and I assume that many designers will be glad to see manufacturers such as Microchip making efforts to support and improve this functionality. The PIC32MZ DA family includes a graphics controller, a graphics processing unit (GPU), and up to 32 MB of RAM.

Ive never had any need for encryption in my projects and I honestly know very little about it. But I readily believe that its important in these days of cybercriminals, identify theft, and shady business practices (shady business practices are nothing new, I supposeI doubt the Phoenicians attributed their success to fair trade). Microchip is emphasizing the importance of data security in the context of an IoT world, and that makes sense: if indeed the world will one day be filled with little Internet-connected devices sending data every which way, we might as well do what we can to protect that data from malefactors.

The CEC1702 is a 32-bit microcontroller built around an ARM Cortex-M4 processor. The special security features are described as encryption, authentication, and private and public key capabilities. As usual, this integrated functionality provides significant performance benefits by using hardware to accomplish tasks that otherwise would burden the processor; the product page mentions a factor-of-100 performance improvement for encryption and decryption.

In addition to typical encryption of data and code, the CEC1702 offers the following:

Do you have experience with complex embedded graphics applications? Do you think that the functionality offered by the PIC32MZ DA would be a significant advantage in the design process?

Read the original here:
MCU or DSP?: Graphics and Cryptography in Microchip's New Microcontrollers - All About Circuits