Office of the National Cyber Director Announces Senior Leadership – The White House

Today, the Office of the National Cyber Director announced Kemba Walden as the first Principal Deputy National Cyber Director and Neal Higgins and Rob Knake as Deputy National Cyber Directors. These key personnel will join Deputy National Cyber Director for Federal Cybersecurity and Federal Chief Information Security Officer Chris DeRusha in fulfilling ONCDs mission to ensure every American can share in the full benefits of our digital ecosystem.

As we continue to build this new office, the additions of Kemba, Neal, and Rob will accelerate our efforts to protect Americans in cyberspace, said National Cyber Director Chris Inglis. Each of these leaders brings impressive experience in cybersecurity policy making to our team, and their diverse perspectives will be invaluable as we strengthen our collective defense.

More on these additions:

Principal Deputy National Cyber Director Kemba Eneas Walden is an attorney with extensive experience in government and the private sector. She comes to ONCD from Microsoft, where she served as an Assistant General Counsel in Microsofts Digital Crimes Unit (DCU) responsible for launching and leading DCUs Ransomware Program. Prior to joining Microsoft, Kemba spent a decade in government service at the Department of Homeland Security, most recently at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. She was appointed to the Cyber Safety Review Board and holds a J.D. from the Georgetown University Law Center, Masters in Public Affairs from Princeton University, and B.A. from Hampton University.

Deputy National Cyber Director for National Cybersecurity Neal Higgins comes to ONCD from CIA, where he served as Associate Deputy Director for Digital Innovation, responsible for CIAs cyber operations, open source collection, data science, and secure global communications.Neal also served as CIAs Director of Congressional Affairs and as deputy chief of the WikiLeaks Task Force.Before joining CIA, Neal served in several senior staff roles in the United States Senate and worked as an editor at Foreign Affairs and as a member of the trial team prosecuting Slobodan Milosevic. Neal is a graduate of Princeton University, Harvard Law School, and the Fletcher School of Law & Diplomacy.

Deputy National Cyber Director for Strategy and Budget Rob Knake is a cybersecurity policy expert with decades of experience in the field. Prior to joining ONCD, he was a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, a fellow at the Harvard Belfer Centers Cyber Project, and an adviser to cybersecurity startups and Fortune 500 companies. During the Obama Administration, he served in the cyber directorate at the National Security Council and at the Department of Homeland Securitys National Protection & Programs Directorate, the predecessor organization to CISA. He is a graduate of Harvards Kennedy School of Government and the co-author of two books on cybersecurity.

Higgins and Knake have already assumed their roles at ONCD while Walden will be joining the office in the coming weeks.

###

See more here:

Office of the National Cyber Director Announces Senior Leadership - The White House

Russian-language Journalists Forced off Stripe by Sanctions Turn to Crypto – Blockworks

Independent Russian-language website Meduza has raised more than $260,000 in crypto after Western sanctions crippled its ability to field donations through other means.

Meduza, which operates out of Latvia, turned to crypto after fintech giant Stripe stopped supporting payments to the website.

The news outlet was established in the wake of Russias annexation of Crimea in 2014. Independent reporting on the Ukrainian war is now basically illegal, but Meduza still publicly investigates and documents alleged Russian war crimes from its Riga newsroom.

Russias internet censors now block multiple news outlets including Meduza forcing Russia-based readers to access the site via virtual private networks and Telegram channels.

Last year, Meduza was labeled a foreign agent, which ultimately put a stop to local advertising revenue. Crypto has now reportedly enabled Meduza to rely entirely on funds sent from foreigners for the first time.

Before the war, Meduza fielded donations from around 30,000 Russian readers, according to Bloomberg. The outlets traffic has since been slashed by a third.

Meduza has recently been asking international audiences to donate cash (dollars, euros and crypto). It accepts bitcoin, ether (and Ethereum-based tokens), monero, BNB (and other BNB Chain tokens), Zcash, and Tether (USDT). Fiat contributions can still be sent via bank transfer or PayPal.

Meduzas crypto donors have so far sent 3.75 BTC ($117,400), nearly 50 ETH ($118,400), and more than $30,000 in various ERC-20 and BNB Chain tokens, including stablecoins Tether and USDC. None of the trackable crypto has been withdrawn so far, according to blockchain data reviewed by Blockworks.

Large individual contributions include 12 ETH ($28,500) received last Monday and 1 BTC ($31,500) netted the day after.

The outlet says it will use that money to quickly resettle its 25 journalists, mostly in the Latvian capital. Meduza Editor-in-Chief Ivan Kolpakov told reporters that Meduza is currently only raising half of what it needs.

Germanys Deutsche Welle and US-funded Radio Free Europe have also set up shop in Riga following the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Russian independent outlet Novaya Gazeta is planning to start a new operation there as well, noted Bloomberg.

In any case, Meduza joins a growing list of journalistic organizations to accept contributions via crypto, including the Freedom of the Press Foundation, WikiLeaks, Bellingcat and the Committee to Protect Journalists.

Get the days top crypto news and insights delivered to your inbox every evening.Subscribe to Blockworks free newsletternow.

Blockworks

Editor

Read more here:

Russian-language Journalists Forced off Stripe by Sanctions Turn to Crypto - Blockworks

The JD Vance I Knew – The Atlantic

Last week, Politico reported on a strange leak from the J. D. Vance campaign. A super PAC supporting the Ohio Republicanwho won the partys nomination for Senate on May 3had commissioned opposition research to help Vance defend against his vulnerabilities. The super PAC discovered that a decade ago, the now staunchly pro-Trump Vance had written a half dozen articles for a website run by a future anti-Trumper: me. Politico found the super PACs report and posted a link to it.

The site was called FrumForum.com. From 2009 to 2012, it tried to imagine a reformed Republican Party: more economically inclusive, more culturally modern, more environmentally aware. The project proved unsuccessful, to put it mildly. Yet it attracted dozens of young writers who subsequently advanced to important careers and high reputations. One of them was J. D. Vance.

Vance wrote for FrumForum under a pseudonym. So, even as my former contributors career has lurched in disturbing directions, Ive felt honor-bound to maintain confidentiality about the pieces. I also felt that the substance of what he wrote, while revealing, didnt at the time rise to the level of urgent public interest. Now the record is out there, not by my doing.

In some ways, there are continuities between the FrumForum Vance and candidate Vance. Both are deeply concerned about the deteriorating prospects for working-class white America; both are immigration skeptics. But the differences are more profound. FrumForum Vance scorned culture-warring, valued expertise, endorsed social inclusion, rejected partisan rancor, and supported Americas important role in world security. All that has been left behind by Senate candidate Vance.

Tom Nichols: The moral collapse of J. D. Vance

One Vance essay for FrumForum praised former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman as a truer conservative than Texas Governor Rick Perry. Another attacked ethanol subsidies. A third endorsed cuts to the future growth of Medicare and Social Security. (Vance wrote: Of all the things I cant stand about politics, the tendency to emotionalize a difficult topic is probably the worst.) In the course of writing about the Supreme Court, he conceded his support for race-conscious affirmative action.

A fifth essay defended the U.S. war in Iraq against a video released by WikiLeaks showing an Apache helicopter firing upon and killing at least 10 Iraqis. War will always be a grisly business, Vance wrote. Im not a peacenik, and I supported the Iraq invasion on the merits, but its folly to send troops to do the toughest job and then be shocked by the attitude that some show while doing it. A sixth expressed Vances disdain for the rhetorical populism of the Tea Party era. It defended ultraselective elite universities, and championed government by the best and the brightest. He wrote: I was raised primarily by my grandparents in a dying steel town. They taught me that if I worked hard and believed in myself, I could do anything. They were right. This fall Im headed to Yale Law School, and Ill join 200 other studentsof every colorvirtually all of whom scored above the 95th percentile on the LSAT. Our best institutions of higher learningwarts and alldemand excellence from their students.

I admired this outspoken young writer. More than that, I liked him. I welcomed his rise as a future leader of reformist conservatismand him as a guest in my home for dinner parties.

Vance has obviously traveled a long way since those days, and I was a spectator to some of that journey.

In the early 2010s, Vance and I talked about a book he might write, outlining how government policy could address poverty and addiction in rural America. When Vance did write a proposal for that book, he opened with a personal introduction. His publisher advised him to discard the policy chapters and expand the introduction into a book-length memoir. The result was the megabest seller Hillbilly Elegy.

Cassie Chambers Armstrong: Hillbilly Elegy doesnt reflect the Appalachia I know

Vances superpower in those days was his biographical credibility as he spoke about Trump America to non-Trump America. In talks at forums like the Aspen Institute, in an essay for The Atlantic, across elite tables at venues like the investment bank Allen & Companys Sun Valley media conference, Vance urged understanding of the people who had voted for Trump, even as he excoriated Trump himself as unfit, bigoted, authoritarian, fraudulenta deceiver and exploiter of the people Vance spoke for.

Vances message was tough, but his tone was measured. In those days, the figure he most modeled himself upon was Barack Obama. Vance made the comparison explicit in an early-January 2017 opinion article for The New York Times, titled Barack Obama and Me. Vance pointed out the similarities between their lives: absent father, raised by grandparents, prestigious law degree, literary fame. He described President Obama as a man whose history looked something like mine but whose future contained something I wanted I benefited, too, from the example of a man whose public life showed that we need not be defeated by the domestic hardships of youth.

Before the 2016 election, Vances future political path looked straightforward. He would await the expected Trump defeat, then emerge as a next-generation Republican savior: a candidate who could speak from his origins in Appalachia to the suburbs of Columbus, all while preserving his connections to his donors in Silicon Valley.

Trumps Electoral College victory complicated the calculation. Some Democrats wooed Vance to change parties. Obamas campaign guru David Axelrod had Vance as a guest on his popular podcast the month after Vances Times article was published.

More plausible was a path for Vance as leader of the internal Republican opposition to Trump. About a week after the inauguration, in 2017, Vance invited me and a dozen other anti-Trump conservatives to a quiet meeting in a downtown Washington, D.C., conference room to discuss ways forward from the Trump predicament. That meeting was off the record, but Vance subsequently emailed participants to alert us that he himself had spoken to a reporter about it.

Read: Opioid of the masses

Among the topics we considered: Could any good come from the Trump administration? How outspoken should we be in opposition? The meeting did not reach conclusions, but it did not need to. The unspoken but widely understood agenda looked further into the future: We were present at the creation of a Vance for President campaign that might go into operation sometime in the late 2020s or early 2030s.

I imagine that many of the participants in that meeting still hold such hopes. Vances subsequent choices, however, have ensnared his plans. In a reversal of the usual political trajectory, Vances writing and speaking have edged angrier and uglier as he has gained success and prominence.

In July 2021, Vance inveighed against the childless left who have made no physical commitment to the future of this country. In November, he attacked fellow Ohioan LeBron James for criticizing Kyle Rittenhouses demeanor at his homicide trial: Lebron is one of the most vile public figures in our country. Total coward.

In a September podcast, he urged that Trump, upon his hypothetical restoration to office in 2024, purge the government of federal employees who arent loyal to him and defy the courts if the purge was held illegal.

When he got the endorsement recently of Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who notoriously floated a conspiracy theory about Californias wildfires being started by space lasers associated with Rothschild Inc., he tweeted: Honored to have Marjories endorsement. Were going to win this thing and take the country back from the scumbags.

The former supporter of the Iraq War has turned into one of the nations preeminent scorners of Ukraines fight for independence, declaring: I gotta be honest with you, I dont really care what happens to Ukraine. At the end of last month, Vance even suggested that President Joe Biden was plotting intentionally to flood the U.S. with deadly fentanyl: It does look intentional. Its like Biden wants to punish people who didnt vote for him.

David A. Graham: The art of the dealer

In April of this year, Vance tweeted: Barack Obama is articulate but has never made a memorable speech. The reason is that his views are utterly conventional. Hes unable of saying anything outside of the elite consensus. Hes a walking, talking Atlantic magazine subscription. What prompted that highly personal outburst against Vances former role model and the magazine to which he himself had contributed his sharpest anti-Trump criticisms? A video clip of Obama speaking negatively of Steve Bannon and Vladimir Putin.

Many who knew the early Vance ponder the question: What happened to him?

I dont overthink that question; the answer seems obvious enough. I ponder something else.

The anti-populist conservative Vance persona of 201017 was well designed to please the individuals and constituencies that held power over his future at that juncture in his career. The angry-white-male persona of 201722 was as perfectly aimed at the Thiel-Trump-Tucker nexus as the earlier iteration had been to the Allen-Aspen-Atlantic one.

With a Senate nomination secured, Vance now has new constituencies to please. Ohio today is not the swing state it used to be, yet its still home to many non-Trumpy constituencies, including tens of thousands of voters of Ukrainian descent. If elected to the Senate, Vance may rekindle still-higher ambitions, ambitions that cannot be realized by the narrowly based support that got him not quite a third of the vote in last weeks Ohio Republican primary. I very much doubt that the Vance for President dream has diednot in him, and not in his backers.

So the question I ponder is not: What happened to the J.D. I knew? It is: Who will J.D. become next?

Here is the original post:

The JD Vance I Knew - The Atlantic

True Meaning of DAOs – Bitcoin as Business – hackernoon.com

Bitcoin is not just a blockchain but a DAO that evolves along with the users needs in an ever-changing world. Bitcoin is governed by a headless management consisting of miners that expend large amounts of computing power to keep the network alive and well. Bitcoin would never have survived past its fragile infancy if it wasnt for a strong community of devoted developers that worked tirelessly on a volunteer basis to make the project succeed. In late 2010, the scandal-stricken whistleblower website Wikileaks was considering using Bitcoin as means of funding after the US government had forced companies like Visa, Mastercard, and Paypal to blockade the organization.

Legal background, interested in business, and tech. http://www.futuristiclawyer.com

I have seen some articles lately, typically posted by profiles from shady investment companies who make the ridiculous claim that Bitcoin is too old-fashioned, volatile, environmentally unfriendly, and just plain boring, to keep up with upcoming metaversea new way of life in the digital realm.

The metaverse-will-take-over-bitcoin theory is easy to dismiss. First of all, at this point in time, the metaverse is a pure fantasy constructed and promoted by Big Tech. More than anything else, I cant help but see the metaverse as a distraction technique applied by Meta to divert the consumers attention away from bigger problems with their platforms like privacy issues and pronounced mental health issues among their users.

However, the online space is indeed evolving, and new developments including Web 3.0 applications and DAOs are certainly gaining ground. A question worth posing is whether Bitcoin with its limited functionality can continue to stay relevant while dApps, NFTs, Defi, and DAOs are increasingly developed and used on more advanced smart contract platforms like Ethereum and Solana.

Based on the research I have done for this post; the answer should unanimously be yes. Those who claim that Bitcoin is the most outdated and useless blockchain have missed an important point. Bitcoin is not just a blockchain but a DAO that evolves along with the users needs in an ever-changing world.

The first and most successful example of a DAO is Bitcoin. As critics would point out, Bitcoin may be a bit primitive for a DAO, since it does not do much, but merely exists as a store of value or a medium of exchange, depending on how you use it. However, Bitcoin is operating by pre-encoded rules independent of any single individual or central authority. By definition, Bitcoin is thereby decentralized, and at least semi-autonomous because human users are still needed to update the software and implement proposals. But that is not different from how many other DAOs operate today.

In a traditional joint-stock company the interplay between four main roles helps the company to realize its value: shareholders (owners), management, employees, and users.[1] In the Bitcoin network, we dont see the same strict division of roles or internal hierarchy. Bitcoin is, like other DAOs, owned, managed, employed, and used by the community as a whole.

If we view Bitcoin through the lenses of traditional corporate structure, the owners would be the investors since they are the primary group to command price movements. [2] At the crossroads, the network develops in the direction where most value can be generated for all stakeholders. That direction is determined by the investors through supply and demand.

The Bitcoin network is governed by a headless management consisting of miners that expend large amounts of computing power to keep the network alive and well. They are responsible for the daily operation of Bitcoin along with nodes that broadcast and validate transactions on the network. The developers are also vitally important community members, and like miners and nodes, they typically wear all the four hats of the traditional roles in a joint-stock company.

Bitcoin would never have survived past its fragile infancy if it wasnt for a strong community of devoted developers that worked tirelessly on a volunteer basis to make the project succeed. If bugs were somehow discovered and exploited early on, or if the network was overpowered by malicious nodes in its early make-it-or-break-it stage, Bitcoin would quickly have faded into oblivion as just another fad.

Another major concern that was apparent in Bitcoins early years was too much attention from the press which could lead to unwanted government interest. In late 2010, the scandal-stricken whistleblower website Wikileaks was considering using Bitcoin as means of funding after the US government had forced companies like Visa, Mastercard, and Paypal to blockade the organization.[3]

Exactly one week before Satoshi Nakamotos permanent disappearance, he replied to a forum member on bitcointalk.org who encouraged Wikileaks to bring it on:[4]

Some days later, Satoshis posted his famous penultimate message:[5]

The fact that Satoshi Nakamoto upheld his anonymity and left the project without a trace cements Bitcoins status as a community-driven organization without a CEO, board of directors, executives, or identifiable founder. The community as a whole is responsible for the direction that Bitcoin takes.

As NY Times wrote in an article from January 2016 before DAOs became a thing:[6]

Bitcoin resembles a participatory democracy as every participant in the network has the ability to vote in a narrow sense of the word. Since the software is open-source, anyone can propose changes, and run any version of the software that they see fit. Technically, proposals and feedback on proposals are managed, discussed, and implemented via software-based BIPs (Bitcoin Improvement Proposals).[7]

Bitcoins Taproot upgrade which was implemented in November 2021, exemplifies how nodes, developers, and miners can successfully work together and agree on protocol changes. Bitcoins incentive structure ensures that the community acts in the networks best interest at all times, since contributing to the network is more profitable than trying to damage it.

Now that we have concluded that Bitcoin is a DAO, lets take a closer look at Bitcoins role in the Web 3.0 space.

People get involved in the Web 3.0 space for various reasons (a side remark: I believe that the Web 3.0 space is probably a better term than crypto space or blockchain space since it has a broader meaning than the former and is more relatable, less technical-sounding than the latter.)

The vast majority of developers and users join the Web 3.0 space to seek new opportunities and have fun. One could argue that few regular users are turned on by studying Bitcoins source code, or like me by reading and writing lengthy articles about Bitcoins potential. So, lets rephrase and ask the same question from the introduction: if Web 3.0 is fun and exciting, how can Bitcoin as a relatively old and slow technology continue to stay relevant?

What binds Web 3.0 users together are that they typically subscribe to the importance of Bitcoins philosophy. Just as the internet has revolutionized the world by digitizing traditional businesses, blockchain technology which was born with Bitcoin has the potential to revolutionize the internet by decentralizing it.

Analogue Business Digital Business Decentralized Business.

I note that technically speaking decentralization is a misnomer since central entities will necessarily still be a big part of the decentralized web. In alignment with the first academic definition of Web 3.0, a more befitting adjective to describe Web 3.0 would be verifiable because users can attest to the correctness of code execution or the authenticity of data feeds.[8] The development of Web 3.0 can eventually turn the internet into a truly public good, instead of a private good dominated by a short list of monopolistic, profit-seeking intermediary businesses.

What some casual altcoiners have still not caught on to is that Bitcoin will most likely be a key institution in the Web 3.0 space. Not just as a grandfather of new innovation in blockchain. In the future, Bitcoins infrastructure could provide the security for a much larger ecosystem of decentralized applications (dapps) and DAOs.

The classical blockchain trilemma[9] concerns the inevitable tradeoff between decentralization, security, and scalability. A traditional blockchain can only have two of the three properties. For example, Bitcoin is highly decentralized with no trusted intermediary or central point of control, highly secure as transactions are validated and broadcasted to all nodes in the network, but Bitcoin is also unable to scale due to the rigorous, slow verification process.

Layer 2 solutions such as the Lightning Network are built on top of Bitcoin to scale the networkpotentially into a worldwide payment system like VISAby processing transactions off the main blockchain. Layer 2 uses the base protocol (Layer 1) as a secure settlement layer to validate bundles of smaller transactions at once. Layer 3 will be the application layer that uses Layer 2 to provide interfaces and software that millions of users can access. [10]Besides, Layer 3 is prospected to introduce cross-chain functionality so different blockchains can communicate and interact with each other.[11]

In other words, Layer 2 and Layer 3 on Bitcoin and other well-established blockchains could very possibly be where Web 3.0 happens in the future. The multi-layered approach resembles how the internet is built, not as one, but as multiple protocols designed on top of each other, each leveraging the one below. [12]

Trust Machine is one example of a company that has raised $150M in funding to expand Bitcoin to a Web 3.0 platform by utilizing this layered approach. CEO and co-founder, Muneeb Ali, previously co-founded Stacks which Trust Machines will be built upon. Stacks is a programming layer on Bitcoin that enables DeFi, NFTs, apps, and smart contracts while relying on Bitcoins consensus mechanism for security. Read more about it here.

Impervious is a Layer 3 solution built on the Lightning Network. Like Trust Machines and Stacks it works towards bringing Web 3.0 functionality to Bitcoin. Impervious has developed a web browser that was announced on April 7 2022 at the annual Bitcoin conference in Miami.[13]

The founder Chase Perkins neatly formulates what the purpose of the Impervious Browser will be [14]:

Impervious is also a programmatic layer that developers can write programs on with the security of Bitcoin, and the quickness of the Lightning Network for fast data transmissions. Read more about Impervious here.

Perhaps in the future, the unrivaled security of Bitcoins base protocol could serve as a breeding ground for the new internet of valuesimilar to how physical infrastructure like coax and fiber cables forms the backbone of the internet. [15]

Please join me in my next post, where we will learn more about practical use cases for DAOs.

This article was first published here.

[1] See Is the Bitcoin community a DAO? thread on bitcointalk.org: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349365.0 (29042022).

[2] Daniel Krawisz (Feb 2015) -> Who Controls Bitcoin? -> https://nakamotoinstitute.org/mempool/who-controls-bitcoin/ (28042022).

[3] Bitcoin History Part 19: Wikileaks and the Hornets Nest (Nov 2019) https://thebitcoinnews.com/bitcoin-history-part-19-wikileaks-and-the-hornets-nest/ (29042022).

[4] Reply to thread on Bitcointalk Wikileaks contact info? -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735.140

[5] Reply to thread on Bitcointalk PC World Article on Bitcoin -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2216.msg29280#msg29280

[6] Nathanial Popper (Jan 2016), A Bitcoin Believers Crisis of Faith -> https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/business/dealbook/the-bitcoin-believer-who-gave-up.html (14042022).

[7] See more: Archie Chaudhury (Oct 2021), Why the Bitcoin Network Is the Original DAO -> https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/why-bitcoin-network-is-original-dao (29042022).

[8] Liu et. al (2021), Make Web 3.0 Connected A Perspective from Interoperability and Programmability across Blockchains, pg. 2.

[9] Vitalik Buterin (April 2021), Why sharding is great: demystifying the technical properties -> https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/04/07/sharding.html

[10] Tom Wilson (Marc 2022), Web 3.0, DeFi & dApps Soon On Bitcoin? And 3 High Potential Projects! -> https://medium.com/general_knowledge/web-3-0-defi-dapps-soon-on-bitcoin-and-3-high-potential-projects-ce696a88df47 (24042022).

[11] See e.g., Evan Schwartz (Oct 2018), Layer 3 Is for Interoperability -> https://medium.com/xpring/layer-3-is-for-interoperability-ca387fa5f7e2.

[12] Ibid.

[13]Charles Jenkins (Jan 2022). Impervious Browser: Functionality Overview -> https://newsletter.impervious.ai/impervious-browser-functionality-overview/

[14] Ibid.

[15]AAX (Aug 2021), Layer 3 Solutions on Bitcoin & Blockchain -> AAX Academy https://academy.aax.com/en/layer-3-solutions-on-bitcoin-blockchain/.

Read more from the original source:

True Meaning of DAOs - Bitcoin as Business - hackernoon.com

Canadas ban on Chelsea Manning upheld by Immigration and Refugee Board – Toronto Star

A federal tribunal has upheld Ottawas decision to keep Chelsea Manning from entering Canada due to her conviction in the United States for revealing to WikiLeaks sensitive government documents that exposed American troops conduct during the war on terror.

The Immigration and Refugee Board decision is drawing criticism from experts who say Canadas rules regarding individuals deemed inadmissible on criminal grounds were not designed to keep people such as Manning out of the country, and that the system, as it is, seems ill-equipped to acknowledge and fairly deal with whistleblowers.

Although the board did find disclosing documents to WikiLeaks would not constitute an offence in Canada, it said the offence Manning was convicted of under the U.S. Espionage Act would constitute unauthorized use of computer under the Canadian Criminal Code, an indictable offence liable for up to 10 years in jail.

A visitor to Canada can be barred from entry for security reasons such as espionage, attempt to overthrow a government, violence or terrorism. A person belonging to a group involved in war crimes or organized crime, as well those with criminal records including drug- and alcohol-related offences are also inadmissible. Such individuals are referred to the board for adjudication.

Ms. Manning downloaded an unauthorized program onto her work computer and retrieved hundreds of thousands of Department of State cables for the purpose of transmitting them to WikiLeaks This can be qualified as an unauthorized use for a prohibited purpose, adjudicator Marisa Musto wrote in a 59-page decision released Friday.

The fact that she could access the information in the normal course of her work does not negate the fact that, in the circumstances related to this case, she was not accessing the information for work purposes but for the purposes of sending it to WikiLeaks.

Manning, a former private in the U.S. army, was sentenced to 35 years in prison in 2013 by court-martial under the U.S. Espionage Act for revealing thousands of U.S. government documents, including an infamous video depicting brutal U.S. air attacks against Iraqi civilians.

Her revelation of the documents to WikiLeaks prompted some to brand her a traitor. Others lauded her for an act of conscience that exposed the conduct of American forces on the ground, which contributed to changing the public discourse about the U.S.-led wars and counterterrorism measures.

While U.S. president, Barack Obama commuted her sentence in the interests of justice. She was released in 2017.

In September of that same year, Manning, who is now a network security consultant and advocate, tried to enter Canada at the St-Bernard-de-Lacolle port of entry to visit friends in Montreal and organize a series of speaking engagements here. She was turned away for her record of serious criminality.

Queens University immigration law professor Sharry Aiken said shes not surprised by the tribunal decision, given the restrictive inadmissibility provisions in the law.

Chelsea Manning is not somebody that the criminal inadmissibility procedures were designed for. People may disagree about the acts that she undertook and the motivations for those acts. But theres no question that the United States was engaged in egregious violations of international humanitarian law in the way that it conducted its war on terror, said Aiken, who is not involved in Mannings case.

Chelsea Mannings motivations as a whistleblower have been clearly documented.

In 2021, after a long delay, the Canadian government referred Manning to an admissibility hearing before the refugee board. A two-day hearing was held in October, where her lawyers argued that Canadian statues had provisions for whistleblower protection that their client is entitled to, and her action was justified due to public interest.

However, Musto said what Manning released was essentially a data dump, through which hundreds of thousands of cables, pertaining to numerous seemingly unrelated subjects of varied importance, were indiscriminately copied and transferred.

Unlike the war logs which, despite being voluminous, were directly related to the activity of the U.S. in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, it has not been demonstrated that all or even the bulk of the diplomatic cables Ms. Manning accessed and downloaded or that she was convicted of disclosing were in relation to the war on terror or to serious abuses and violations she felt it was necessary to expose, Musto said.

Although the person concerned argues that her conduct was not dishonest because its purpose was to reveal gross violations of international law and serious abuses, the reality is that the evidence demonstrates that she did not select the cables based on their subject matter or content.

Musto said it is difficult to conclude that in order to protect the lives of Afghan and Iraqi civilians and detainees, it was necessary for Manning to obtain cables pertaining to entirely unrelated matters.

Although Ms. Manning stated she believed the release of the cables would not damage the U.S. beyond causing embarrassment to the Department of State, the cables were obviously restricted to internal use and considering the often delicate nature of diplomatic relations, wrote Musto.

It is not unreasonable to think that the publication of some of those cables may have done more harm than good.

Aiken said Canadas inadmissibility standards are flawed and reforms are long overdue to allow a more holistic assessment of an individuals circumstances. In Mannings case, for example, humanitarian factors should have been taken into account in the deliberation of the decision, she contended.

We are using immigration laws to bar access to the country. It really highlights the extent to which the mantle of criminalization prevails in immigration, she noted.

In a statement, Mannings lawyers, Joshua Blum and Lex Gill, said their client intends to challenge the tribunal decision before the Federal Court in part on the basis that the provision under the unauthorized use of computer in the Criminal Code is overbroad and criminalizes whistleblowing.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

Anyone can read Conversations, but to contribute, you should be registered Torstar account holder. If you do not yet have a Torstar account, you can create one now (it is free)

Sign In

Register

Read more from the original source:

Canadas ban on Chelsea Manning upheld by Immigration and Refugee Board - Toronto Star

We Need a Uniform Standard of Justice, from Ukraine to Afghanistan – Democracy Now!

By Amy Goodman & Denis Moynihan

In early April, shocking video surfaced revealing the brutal murder of civilians by an occupying army. The year was 2010, however, not 2022, in Iraq, not Ukraine, and the soldiers were American, not Russian. On April 5th, 2010, Wikileaks, the whistleblower website, released a classified U.S. military video it called Collateral Murder. The video was recorded on July 12, 2007 aboard a U.S. Army Apache helicopter gunship as it fired on a crowd in Baghdad. Two Reuters employees were killed, along with at least eight others, and two children were seriously injured. The video includes audio of U.S soldiers laughing and swearing as they kill, as well as radio transmissions authorizing the attacks from their chain of command. Ultimately, only one U.S. soldier was prosecuted: Army Private Chelsea Manning was court martialed, not for participating in that attack on civilians, but for revealing it to the world.

Collateral Murder and the trove of documents Manning uploaded to Wikileaks, the Iraq War Logs and the Afghan War Logs, documented numerous atrocities committed by the U.S., in cold, military jargon.

In the twelve years since the video was released, military conflicts and the inevitable crimes that accompany them have raged around the world, from Congo to Sudan, Ethiopia and Tigray to Libya, from Yemen to Burma to West Papua, to name just a few. In Ukraine, the level of video and photographic documentation, satellite imagery and drone footage published instantaneously and shared globally is unprecedented.

Images of dead civilians littering the streets of Bucha, a suburb of Kyiv, many executed with their hands bound behind their backs, have shocked the world. Hospitals have been bombed across the country, as have civilian shelters. Russia is also accused of deploying a new type of antipersonnel landmine, which explodes not only when stepped on but merely when a person walks near them. War crimes have reportedly been committed by Ukrainian defenders as well, against Russian prisoners of war and suspected collaborators.

So-called rules of engagement are regularly ignored in the all-consuming violence and barbarism of war. U.S. and coalition troops were guilty of this in Afghanistan, as documented by Mannings disclosures to Wikileaks and often corroborated by journalists and human rights investigators. Few if any of those who committed atrocities will ever be held accountable.

Unfortunately, the U.S. would not allow the International Criminal Court to even investigate potential U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan, and there were many of them, Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the peace group CodePink, said this week on the Democracy Now! news hour, shortly after returning from a U.S. womens delegation to Afghanistan. The U.S. is not even a party to the International Criminal Court. It would be nice to have a judgment against those who took us into this war in Afghanistan.

President Biden recently doubled-down on his accusation that Russian President Vladimir Putin is a war criminal. Many world leaders are following suit. The traditional venue for investigation and prosecution of war crimes, since its founding in the 1990s, is the International Criminal Court (ICC), created by the Rome Statute, currently ratified by 123 nations. The United States has consistently rejected formal ratification, as has Russia. Ukraine as well is not a signatory to the ICC, but has granted the body limited jurisdiction over events in its territory since late 2013, when Ukraine was consumed by the Maidan protests, the overturning of its pro-Russian government, followed by Russias annexation of Crimea, ongoing military conflict in the Donbas region, and the current invasion.

Bidens escalating rhetoric against Putin will continue to ring hollow as long as the U.S. rejects the ICC. In June, 2020, Bidens predecessor Donald Trump went so far as to sanction senior ICC figures, blocking them from entering the U.S. Then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo referred to the ICC as a thoroughly broken and corrupted institution. What triggered the Trump administration was the ICCs investigation of possible U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan. Biden, to his credit, removed these absurd sanctions. But he still refuses to submit to the authority of the ICC, while at the same time promoting a war crimes prosecution of Putin.

We need a uniform standard of justice to hold accountable perpetrators of war crimes, wherever they may occur. The U.S. should join the majority of the world, ratify the Rome Statute, and respect the authority and jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.

Go here to see the original:

We Need a Uniform Standard of Justice, from Ukraine to Afghanistan - Democracy Now!

Who is Daniel Kinahan? The alleged Irish crime boss wanted by US authorities – Sky News

He was once showered with praise by Tyson Fury for brokering what should have been one of the biggest fights in British boxing history.

Now, the US government is offering $5m for information that leads to the arrest or conviction of Daniel Kinahan and the other leaders of the Kinahan cartel.

The dramatic intervention is seen as a major blow to the sprawling criminal gang, whose drug and firearms trafficking grew out of Dublin streets to span countries around the world.

Here, Sky News looks at what we know about Kinahan, the alleged crime boss who is said to have brought "an element of terror" to the world of boxing.

Early life

Born in 1977 in Dublin, Kinahan is the eldest son of Christy Kinahan, a convicted drug dealer widely reported to be the founder of his family's criminal operation.

Kinahan has claimed he was raised in a deprived area, with serious levels of poverty and crime, which sparked his interest in boxing.

"People like me, from there, aren't expected to do anything with their lives other than serve the middle and upper classes," he said.

"Boxing is a working class sport for which I've had a lifelong love and passion."

Kinahan - who has no criminal convictions - was reportedly arrested in connection with an attack on two police officers outside Dublin's Shelbourne Park greyhound stadium in May 2001.

He was charged with assault and was initially refused bail but the charges were dropped the following January, according to the Irish Independent.

WikiLeaks revelation and arrest in Spain

In 2009, Kinahan was reportedly mentioned in a diplomatic cable sent from a US embassy in South America, in which he was described as a suspected international drug-trafficking figure.

The reference was revealed in a WikiLeaks publication of confidential US documents.

Kinahan was arrested in Spain in 2010, along with his father Christy and brother Christopher Jnr, but the long-running money-laundering case was dropped in 2020.

In 2016, it was reported that Kinahan ran a series of innocuous companies ranging from interior design firms to a cleaning business during his time in Ireland - none of which he ever filed any accounts for.

Company records showed that Kinahan declared himself to be an "upholsterer", the Irish Independent said.

Attempt to kill Kinahan amid gang feud

Kinahan fled Ireland after an attempt was made on his life at a boxing weigh-in at Dublin's Regency Hotel in 2016.

Gunmen from the rival Hutch gang disguised as armed police attempted to murder him, killing his associate David Byrne instead.

Describing the incident, Kinahan said one of the attackers was "maybe six metres from me" when he saw a gun and heard "'boom boom' shots let go".

At least 18 people have been murdered in the feud between the two gangs.

Kinahan, his father Christy and brother Christopher Jnr are all now based in the United Arab Emirates.

In May 2017, Kinahan reportedly got married at Dubai's seven-star Burj al Arab hotel.

Among the guests were Chilean druglord Ricard 'El Rico' Vega, Dutch-Moroccan mobster Ridouan Taghi, and Italian mafioso Raffaele Imperialem, according to Dublin Live.

Tyson Fury's praise for Kinahan

Kinahan co-founded the boxing management company MTK Global, which represents more than 300 fighters including Tyson Fury, Carl Frampton and Billy Joe Saunders.

In June 2020, Fury publicly thanked Kinahan for securing a two-fight deal with fellow British heavyweight boxer Anthony Joshua, in one of the most-anticipated title bouts in the sport's history.

"I'm just after getting off the phone with Daniel Kinahan," Fury said.

"He's just informed me that the biggest fight in British boxing history has just been agreed.

"Big shout out to Dan. He got this done, literally over the line. Two fight deal."

He went on: "So a big thank you to Dan for getting this deal over the line. All the best. God bless you all. See you soon."

There's no suggestion whatsoever of Tyson Fury being associated with any wrongdoing.

After Kinahan's involvement was revealed, then-Irish premier Leo Varadkar said it would be "entirely appropriate" for broadcasters not to show the planned fights.

Following the outcry, KHK, a sports media firm set up by the King of Bahrain's son, said it had dropped Kinahan as an adviser.

And just two weeks after his video praising Kinahan, Fury's US promoter Bob Arum claimed the boxer had terminated his professional relationship with the Irishman.

However Arum added that Fury "loves, admires and respects" Kinahan.

The deal between Fury and Joshua was later scrapped after a ruling meant Fury had to face US boxer Deontay Wilder.

'Dangerous' Kinahan brings 'terror' to boxing

Ireland's former boxing world champion Barry McGuigan has spoken publicly of his serious concerns about Kinahan's role in the sport.

McGuigan branded Kinahan a "dangerous man" whose role in boxing had brought an "element of terror" to the sport.

He told a BBC Panorama documentary last year: "There is no doubt that there is an intimidation effect, there is no question about that.

"If we were to believe what we believe, this is a very dangerous man.

"There's an element of fear and terror around that name.

"Someone has got to look out for this sport. They really need to look at this situation very carefully, because it's bloody dangerous."

After the programme aired, the BBC said a Panorama team had been threatened from unnamed criminal elements in Northern Ireland in relation to the programme.

Kinahan denies criminal gang links

Following the Panorama programme, Kinahan issued a statement insisting he was not linked to a criminal gang.

He also said he was still organising "record-breaking world title fights" despite claims from broadcasters and boxing promoters that they are not dealing with him.

"I can't be any clearer on the fundamental slur - I am not a part of a criminal gang or any conspiracy," he told TalkSport.

"I have no convictions. None. Not just in Ireland but anywhere in the world."

Fury pictured with Kinahan in Dubai as boxing chief offers support

In February this year, Fury was pictured with his arm draped around a smiling Kinahan in Dubai.

A month later, World Boxing Council president Mauricio Sulaiman offered his support to Kinahan after meeting the Irishman.

Writing an opinion piece for The Herald of Mexico, Sulaiman said Kinahan had faced "prejudice" after being "labelled as a person linked to criminal groups".

He added: "I am nobody to judge any person, and that has been the policy of our organisation, to combat all types of discrimination and abuse of power, before any person and group."

Kinahan 'sources large quantities of cocaine from South America'

On Tuesday, the US government announced a $5m (3.8m) reward for information leading to the arrest or conviction of Daniel Kinahan, his father Christy and brother Christopher Jnr.

The US treasury department described the Kinahan crime gang as a "significant transnational criminal organisation".

It said: "Each member of the KOCG (Kinahan Organised Crime Group) reports to Daniel Kinahan, who is believed to run the day-to-day operations of the organisation."

Kinahan has instructed members of the Kinahan crime group to send money to people serving prison sentences including individuals convicted of murder and attempted murder, according to the US treasury department.

Kinahan also "sources large quantities of cocaine from South America" and "plays an integral part in organising the supply of drugs in Ireland, and is attempting to facilitate the importation of cocaine into the United Kingdom," it added.

Some of the biggest figures in boxing - including Fury - have now been urged to cut ties with Kinahan.

Irish police commissioner Drew Harris said: "If you deal with these individuals who have been sanctioned, or these entities who are being sanctioned, you are involved in a criminal network.

"I'd ask them to look to their own business, at the probity of their own business and the relationship with their fans and, really, is this something they want to be involved with in terms of their legitimate business. I think the answer to that is a resounding no."

View post:

Who is Daniel Kinahan? The alleged Irish crime boss wanted by US authorities - Sky News

A socialist program of action for the working class to oppose war and fight COVID-19 and austerity – WSWS

The Socialist Equality Party (SEP) is standing candidates in the 2022 election to advance a socialist program of action for workers to fight for their class interests against the relentless assault on their basic social and democratic rights.

The source of this assault is the historic breakdown of the global capitalist system manifested in the unchecked spread of COVID-19, the growing danger of world war, the continual evisceration of social spending and wages, and the ravages of climate change.

The issue before the working class in Australia and internationally is the fight to end the capitalist profit system which dominates over and determines every aspect of the lives of working people.

Consequently, we are irreconcilably opposed to every other partythe Liberal-National Coalition, the Labor Party, the Greens, the United Australia Party and pseudo-left parties such as Socialist Alliance and the Victorian Socialistsas well as the array of so-called independent candidates who seek to curry favour with the major parties, all within the framework of the political establishment. All of them stand for the defence of the profit system.

This election takes place in conditions of mounting anger and frustration, with support for the Liberal-National Coalition and the Labor opposition at record lows. The campaign of diversionary point scoring, phony promises and invective has one aim: to divert attention from the real issues.

Whatever the shape of the next governmentCoalition, Labor or a minority government backed by various independentsit will make the working class pay for the huge budget deficits and spiralling government debt created by pouring billions into military spending and big-business pandemic support packages. In fact, Labor leader Anthony Albanese is signaling to the ruling class that Labor is the better party to take the country to war and impose austerity.

The Greens are again pledging a greener, kinder Australia with limited policies that they will quite happily ditch to enter a coalitionwith Labor or Liberalas they did in supporting the Gillard Labor government. The billionaire Clive Palmer is spending his millions on TV ads to present himself as a man of the people and get the jump on his rival right-wing populists Pauline Hanson and Jacqui Lambie.

A particularly pernicious role is played the pseudo-left parties. They function to corral the emerging anti-capitalist sentiment and combativeness of workers and young people back behind the very parties and organisations responsible for the crisisLabor, the Greens and the trade unions. Far from being socialist in any sense, they represent the interests of an upper middle-class layer steeped in the divisive and regressive politics of identity based on race and ethnicity, sexuality and gender.

None of these parties is addressing the real concerns and fears of working people or offering any solution to the excruciating daily difficulties facing millions struggling to make ends meet. There is a conspiracy by the media and political establishment not to discuss the major dangers facing humanity and the future of young people in particularthe pandemic, war climate change and the worsening social crisis.

The COVID pandemic is a devastating exposure of capitalism and the ruling classes around the world. Their governments have instituted the unscientific policy of herd immunity and let the deadly virus rip through the worlds population killing up to 20 million already and allowing the emergence of even more dangerous strains. It is a policy of wholesale murder that serves the needs of big business to drive workers back into the factories and workplaces to ensure the continued production of profits.

Australia is no exception. State and federal governments began the reckless lifting of the limited public health measures put in place at the start of the pandemic in December just as the highly infectious Omicron variant was taking hold. Infections, hospitalisations and deaths soared. Schools and workplaces have been turned into mass infection sites. Yet governments and the media insist that people have to live with the virus and act as if the pandemic is over.

Everyone knows it is a lie. Everyone knows at least one person who has been infected, and in some cases, someone who has died. Almost five million people have been infected in the past few months. More than 4,000 people have died of the virus so far this year, nearly double the figure in the first two years of the pandemic.

The responsibility for the catastrophe lies squarely with all parties. Coalition and Labor governments have conspired in the unconstitutional National Cabinet to lift necessary public health measures and unleash the virus. No one has stood up in any parliament to criticise or challenge the policy, let alone demand the prosecution of those responsible for criminal negligence.

The SEP and its sister parties of the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) champion the scientifically based strategy to eliminate the virus. China has demonstrated that elimination is possible, but it cannot be achieved in one country. Internationally-coordinated public health measures are needed.

Workers have a growing sense of foreboding as they watch nuclear-armed powers go head-to-head in Ukraine. Many are distrustful of the daily deluge of propaganda demonising Russian President Vladimir Putin while portraying the right-wing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as the defender of freedom and democracy. We have seen it all beforein the US-led wars in the Balkans, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Libya.

What is behind the US drive to war with Russia? In response to the global breakdown of capitalism, the ruling classes everywhere have only one solution: war against their rivals and class war against the working class.

The most acute expression of the crisis lies at the very heart of world imperialism in Washington. Confronting social and political turmoil at home, the Biden administration has brought forward longstanding plans to subordinate Russia and also China in order to arrest Americas historic decline. It has deliberately goaded Putin into a reactionary and reckless war, calculating it will create chaos in Moscow and facilitate the breakup and US domination of Russia. The chief responsibility for this war rests squarely with the US and its allies that are funneling mountains of arms into Ukraine.

At the same time, the US has not let up pressure, threats and provocations against China in which Australia is playing a central role. The Morrison government with Labors full support joined the AUKUS pact with the US and United Kingdom last September. The military are now acquiring nuclear-powered attack submarines and hypersonic missile. There is bipartisan support for a military budget of over $600 billion this decade. Who will pay this gargantuan sum? Inevitably it will be the working class.

The SEP and the ICFI oppose the Russian invasion of Ukraine, not from the standpoint of supporting the NATO puppet Zelensky, but because it is sowing divisions between Ukrainian and Russian workers. Only a unified anti-war movement of the international working class can halt this reckless plunge towards a nuclear catastrophe. Having sacrificed millions of lives to COVID, the US and its allies will not hesitate to kill many millions more in a nuclear conflagration to prosecute their interests.

An immense gulf exists between working people and the world inhabited by politicians, media personalities and trade union functionaries who rub shoulders with corporate executives and billionaires. They have no idea what it is like to face the excruciating choices between paying the rent or mortgage, seeing a doctor or putting food on the table.

There are literally two Australias. Last year the wealth of the richest 250 Australians increased by $50 billion, to a staggering $520 billion, while wages stagnated, unemployment became more uncertain and government pensions and benefits declined in real terms.

This situation will only get worse. Inflation is rising around the world, including in Australia, driven by the economic dislocation caused by the pandemic and now the Ukraine war. The answer of central banks backed by government is to lift interest rates hitting workers with a double whammyrising mortgage repayments and rent as well as rising prices for goods. Inflation here has already hit 3.5 percent, but for food and fuel is growing at more than 10 percent.

The contempt of governments, state and federal, for working people is epitomised by their response to the recent harrowing scenes of flooding in Lismore and other areas. Morrison visited Lismore, hid from angry residents and told the city that it was on its own: you cannot expect government help the victims of floods, bushfires and cyclonesit is too costly.

Extreme weather events such as flood and bushfires are becoming increasingly common. While the connection to individual events is complex, no one can doubt that climate change is the basic driver of new extremes in temperature and climatic instability, nor that greenhouse gases are chiefly responsible. Yet for decades, governments have fiddled with patently inadequate policies and market-based measures, while the planet has baked. Already scientists are warning that we are on the brink of irreversible changes that threaten the future of humanity.

None of the other parties, including the Greens, has a solution. Their policies are limited to what is possible within the framework of the profit system and the national state, and are therefore piecemeal, parochial and based on the market. But capitalism and its division of the world into rival nation states are the essential barrier to the only real solution: a scientifically-based and internationally coordinated plan to halt and reverse climate change.

The capitalist agenda of social inequality and war is incompatible with democratic forms of rule. Under various pretexts, Coalition and Labor have collaborated in undermining basic democratic rights and legal norms and erecting the scaffolding of a police state that will be used against the working class.

The attack on democratic rights is most nakedly expressed in the endless incarceration of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, an Australian citizen, for exposing the war crimes and diplomatic intrigues perpetrated by the US and its allies. The SEP will continue to take the fight for Assanges freedom into the working class, making it a central feature of our election campaign.

The entire repressive apparatus of the capitalist state, its security forces and battery of anti-democratic laws must be abolished, including the party deregistration legislation and the laws barring dual citizens from standing for parliament.

Decades of abject treachery and betrayal by the trade unions and parties that workers once regarded as theirs have led to a sense of powerlessness. As isolated individuals, it is true workers can do very little. But as a unified fighting force that understands what has to be done the working class is capable of abolishing capitalism and refashioning society globally from top to bottom to meet the needs of humanity. That is the essence of socialist internationalism, and it has terrified the ruling classes ever since it was first inscribed on the banner of workers.

Our campaign is above all aimed at providing workers with the political weapons and organisational means to fight for their interests. After decades of its suppression by the union apparatus, the class struggle is re-emerging in Australia. Nurses and other health workers in New South Wales have shown the way forward, taking their first strike action in over a decade, while teachers, rail workers and a number of other key sections of the working class are engaged in industrial disputes over wages and intolerable working conditions.

These strikes are part of the first stirrings of an international movement that has already seen strikes and mass protests in Sri Lanka, India and Peru as well as through the Middle East and parts of Africa over surging prices for food and fuel and acute shortages. In North America and Europe, workers have increasingly taken strike action, in some cases in open defiance of the trade unions.

The SEP has initiated rank-and-file committees among teachers, university staff, postal workers and health workers, independent of the trade unions, to provide the basis to fight the onslaught on their jobs, wages and conditions. We encourage workers to form democratically elected rank-and-file committees in every factory and workplace and working-class suburb as the means to break out of the shackles of the trade unions and to advance their class demands.

Trade unions no longer defend even the most elementary needs of workers but function as the industrial police for governments and corporations to suppress workers. They rely on the draconian Fair Work legislation put in place by the last Labor government, and supported by the unions, to stand over and menace workers. The abolition of all anti-strike laws needs to be an elementary demand of all rank-and-file committees.

The unification of the working class is the essential means to halt the drive to war, eliminate COVID-19 or arrest climate change. To unify workers, all forms of racism and nationalism must be rejected, and the persecution of refugees and immigrants opposed. Workers must be able to live and work wherever they want with full citizenship rights.

We advance the following demands to meet the pressing needs of working people:

A hue and cry will immediately go out from the financial press, corporate CEOs and their political servants: This is unaffordable. But the working class, the source of all wealth in society, must decide what is affordable and what is not.

Nationalise the banks, finance houses and major corporations under the democratic control of the working class. Seize the colossal wealth of the billionaires. Place production and distribution under democratic workers control. Halt the squandering of billions on the military and weapons of war.

These demands inexorably lead to the issue of which class is to hold the reins of power. A workers government resting on organs created by the working class in its struggles has to be established to reorganise society along socialist lines as part of the fight for socialism internationally.

The SEP is not like other parties. Our ambition is not to establish as many of our members as possible in comfortable seats in parliament. We are based on the principles of socialist internationalism that animated the Russian Revolution and the creation of the first and only genuine workers state in history. We also stand on the lessons of the political fight waged by Leon Trotsky against the betrayal of the Russian Revolution by the Stalinist bureaucracy that usurped power from the working class. We are part of an international partythe ICFIthat alone defends and fights for the program and perspective that underpinned the Fourth International founded by Trotsky in 1938.

While our election campaign is primary orientated to the education and mobilisation of the working class, the SEP does call on workers to vote for our candidates to indicate their support for a socialist alternative. None of the issues confronting workers can be resolved through parliament. But if elected, our candidates will use parliament to expose the institution and the grubby manoeuvres of capitalist politicians, and to popularise our program to a broader audience of the working class.

We urge workers and youth to support our campaign in every way they can. But above all what is needed for the struggles ahead is revolutionary leadership. The history of the last century has demonstrated again and again that without a revolutionary party even the most sizeable and militant of movements of workers ends in defeat. We urge you to join and build the SEP as a mass revolutionary party of the workers.

Join the SEP campaign against anti-democratic electoral laws!

The working class must have a political voice, which the Australian ruling class is seeking to stifle with this legislation.

See original here:

A socialist program of action for the working class to oppose war and fight COVID-19 and austerity - WSWS

The Podesta Emails – WikiLeaks

Agree with Jen.Also tend to agree with her going before him. Anything other than her taking quid pro quo of the table, included what would say first, won't take questions about her actions off the table.Joel BenensonBenenson Strategy GroupOn Apr 29, 2015, at 11:15 PM, Mandy Grunwald > wrote:Why do you think she needs to do this before WJC?Mandy GrunwaldGrunwald Communications202 973-9400On Apr 29, 2015, at 11:12 PM, Robby Mook > wrote:Ditto with John. Would need to be prepared for more...but would be fantastic to limit to one.On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:11 PM, John Podesta > wrote:Fine with the proposed way of handling what she says, but hard setting to take only one question.On Apr 29, 2015 8:02 PM, "Jennifer Palmieri" > wrote:First, thanks to all for the marathon session today, I thought we gota lot of good work done.Second, I wanted to follow up on HRC idea of doing the video. Havingthought about it and talked to Craig and Maura about it - I don'tthink it is good idea for her to do. There aren't great answers andin many cases not her place to answer them.But I think it does make sense for her to publicly state that shenever did anything at state to help a donor. Philippe has been aproponent of this. She could frame it this way:1) very proud of Clinton foundation work.2) think people donate to it bc they want to support good works.3) if anyone did ever give money in hopes of influencing somethingState did - they are foolish bc she never did that and never would.SOS makes life and death decisions and those kinds of politicalconsiderations don't come into play.At least this way she will have taken off the table any notion thatthere was a quid pro quo - even if some donors may have had badintentions.If we did this, think we should do before WJC interview airs onMonday. Which may mean that tomorrow is the last chance we have willshe will be in front of the press (they wont be at fundraisers butwill prob be outside them so she could take a q).What do others think?Sent from my iPhone

Download raw source

See the rest here:

The Podesta Emails - WikiLeaks

Assange one step closer to extradition to United States …

LONDON, Dec 10 (Reuters) - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Friday moved a step closer to facing criminal charges in the United States for one of the biggest ever leaks of classified information after Washington won an appeal over his extradition in an English court.

U.S. authorities accuse Australian-born Assange, 50, of 18 counts relating to WikiLeaks release of vast troves of confidential U.S. military records and diplomatic cables which they said had put lives in danger.

Assange's supporters cast him as an anti-establishment hero who has been persecuted by the United States for exposing U.S. wrongdoing and double-dealing across the world from Afghanistan and Iraq to Washington.

Register

At the Royal Courts of Justice in London, the United States won an appeal against a ruling by a London District Judge that Assange should not be extradited because he was likely to commit suicide in a U.S. prison.

Judge Timothy Holroyde said he was satisfied with a package of assurances given by the United States about the conditions of Assange's detention, including a pledge not to hold him in a so-called "ADX" maximum security prison in Colorado and that he could be transferred to Australia to serve his sentence if convicted.

Further hurdles remain before Assange could be sent to the United States after an odyssey which has taken him from teenage hacker in Melbourne to years holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy in London and then incarcerated in a maximum-security prison.

The legal wrangling will go to the Supreme Court, the United Kingdom's final court of appeal.

"It is highly disturbing that a U.K. court has overturned a decision not to extradite Julian Assange, accepting vague assurances by the United States government," Assange's lawyer, Barry Pollack, said. "Mr. Assange will seek review of this decision by the U.K. Supreme Court."

Supporters of Assange gathered outside of the court after the ruling, chanting "free Julian Assange" and no extradition. They tied hundreds of yellow ribbons to the courts gates and held up placards saying "journalism is not a crime".

Judge Holroyde said the case must now be remitted to Westminster Magistrates Court with the direction judges send it to Home Secretary Priti Patel to decide whether or not Assange should be extradited.

WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange leaves Westminster Magistrates Court in London, Britain January 13, 2020. REUTERS/Simon Dawson/File Photo

Read More

HELICOPTER ATTACK

Assange, who denies any wrongdoing, started out as a teenage hacker with the nickname Mendax - a classical Latin word for liar - but a few decades later would expose some of the United States's darkest secrets.

WikiLeaks came to prominence when it published a U.S. military video in 2010 showing a 2007 attack by Apache helicopters in Baghdad that killed a dozen people, including two Reuters news staff.

It then released thousands of secret classified files and diplomatic cables that laid bare often highly critical U.S. appraisals of world leaders from Russian President Vladimir Putin to members of the Saudi royal family.

Assange jumped bail and was offered refuge in 2012 by Ecuadors then-president Rafael Correa. He spent seven years holed up at the embassy in London while British police spent millions of dollars watching for any sign that he would emerge.

After relations with Ecuador soured, Assange, with white hair and a long beard, was dragged out by British police.

The U.S. Justice Department said Assange was charged with conspiring with former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning to gain access to a government computer as part of a 2010 leak by WikiLeaks of hundreds of thousands of U.S. military reports about the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and American diplomatic communications.

U.S. prosecutors and Western security officials regard Assange as a reckless and dangerous enemy of the state whose actions imperilled the lives of sources named in the leaked material.

His admirers have hailed Assange as a hero for exposing what they describe as abuse of power by modern states and for championing free speech.

"This is a travesty of justice," said Amnesty Internationals Europe Director Nils Muinieks, who said the U.S. indictment posed "a grave threat to press freedom both in the United States and abroad".

Register

Additional reporting by Mark Hosenball in Washington; Writing by Guy Faulconbridge; Editing by Kate Holton, Angus MacSwan and Andrew Heavens

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

See the rest here:

Assange one step closer to extradition to United States ...