Last Week Tonight: John Oliver Talks Unconventional DNC And Senates Trump-Russia Report While Blasting Danbury Again – Deadline

Its become normal that John Oliver starts every episode of Last Week Tonightby saying A lot happened this week because it is wildly accurate. It seemed that this week he was speaking a mile-a-minute in order to try to fit in pertinent news at the top of the show.

First on the list was the Democratic National Convention which many were calling an unconventional convention, thinking that they were the ones that coined that phrase. It was unconventional because it was a virtual affair with delegates coming up with fun ways to showcase their states during the roll call. Oliver particularly put the spotlight on Rhode Island, who was one of the most memorable as they were bragging about calamari as a masked man, Oliver referred to as the calamari ninja presented a plate of the tasty appetizer.

I had no idea that calamari was Rhode Islands official state appetizer, he said. It might be the first thing Ive learned about that state that I have actually liked.

He then took an opportunity to, once again, take some unexplained jabs at Danbury, Connecticut. Aside, of course, that it doesnt include the city of Danbury, Connecticut. Ive said it before, Ill say it again: f*** Danburybabies, elderly, pets, buildings all of you can go f*** yourselves. Of course, this comes after the Danbury mayor recently named their sewage plant after Oliver. This is an unlikely and funny feud that will be providing us with entertainment for weeks to come.

With the DNC, Oliver pointed out that the convention was trying its best to steer in the middle of the road. Although there were appearances by noteworthy progressivs like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Stacey Abrams, a lot of real estate was given to Republicans such as Meg Whitman, Colin Powell and John Kasich.

Its hard to convince progressive voters that youre a foward-looking party when your convention feels like a Zoom cast reunion except the show is the 2008 RNC, he said.

Oliver observed that Bidens nomination speech also played it safe. He showcased warmth and empathy and name-checked broad goals like expanding child care and ending racism. However, his speech was light on details. Instead, he leaned heavily on lines like this: This will determine what America is going to look like for a long, long time. Character is on the ballot, compassion is on the ballot, decency, science, demo theyre all on the ballot. To which Oliver responded: Now normally Id point out that compassion and decency are not concrete policy agendas but considering open authoritarianism is also on the ballot, sure, wtfadequate vs evil lets go.

The DNC spent the four days pointing out that Biden is not Trump. Oliver argued that spending most of the convention saying that Trump is not fit for office may have been redundant because 45 spent the entire week making that case for them by continuing to show his distrust of voting by mail, boycotting Goodyear and refusing to disavow the QAnon conspiracy theory.

Oliver pivoted to what we should have been paying more attention to: Senates report confirming that Trumps campaign was uncomfortably close to Russian intelligence. Its something we already knew, but its nice to have it in writing, he quipped.

New details cited Paul Manaforts willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services as a grave counterintelligence threat. The report also details how Roger Stone tried to get WikiLeaks to drop damaging emails from Hilary Clintons campaign chair just as Trumps infamous Access Hollywood tape came out.

Oliver added that while Trump denied knowledge of Stones activities to Robert Mueller, the report put one hell of an asterisk on that. Contrary to what 45 claims, the committee accessed that Trump did speak to Stoneabout WikiLeaks on multiple occasions.

The bipartisan report comes from a Republican-led senate committee is a truly damning indictment of Trumps character, underscoring just how important the election in November is, said Oliver, and as much as the DNCs platform of Biden is not Trump should be an overwhelmingly successful strategy, the truth is Trump still has a real chance at reelection.

Oliver goes back to the calamari ninja who was interviewed and said he didnt know if he would vote for Biden because he doesnt know him well.

The host gave some sobering truths about this: While your instinctive reaction might be, how can anyone still be undecided? the sad fact is, lots of people still are so I really hope the DNC strategy this week of wooing undecided voters with the star power of John Kasich and Meg Whitman pays off because if the Democrats just spent a week trying to appeal to conservatives who ultimately end up voting Republican then this will actually turn out to be a depressingly conventional convention.

See the article here:

Last Week Tonight: John Oliver Talks Unconventional DNC And Senates Trump-Russia Report While Blasting Danbury Again - Deadline

Texas Governor Says State Avoided The Worst Of Laura’s Destruction – KNBA

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said Thursday afternoon the state had dodged a bullet, sustaining less damage than was expected from Hurricane Laura.

Abbott said that storm surge across the southeast Texas coast turned out to be much less severe than projected, which gave the state a break in terms of the devastation.

"It could've been far worse," he said, during a press conference in the town of Orange. "When you consider the magnitude of the damage that did occur here, we did dodge a bullet."

After surveying the damage this morning, it was clear that Orange County bore the brunt of Laura's power, Abbott said.

"The most significant damage I was able to observe from the sky was in Orange," he said. "You saw more rooftops ripped off. You saw big pieces of steel framing wrapped around trees. You saw some roads still inundated, impassable from water."

Abbott said officials still had much work to do in addressing the areas most impacted by the storm.

Search and rescue teams, including National Guard troops, are already on the ground in the areas impacted by the storm, Abbott said. So far, there are no confirmed deaths in Texas from the storm.

Texas officials stand ready to monitor potential flash flooding and tornadoes that could arise as Laura moves north and exits the state, Abbott said.

More than 160,000 utility customers were affected by power outages in the region affected by the storm as of Thursday afternoon.

The governor said almost 8,500 people evacuated the most vulnerable areas and were provided shelter throughout the state. More than 3,000 people were sheltered in hotel rooms. Abbott urged evacuees to listen to local officials for information about when it is safe to return to their homes.

Abbott credited local officials for implementing evacuation orders and praised residents for following them. Heeding those warnings helped save lives and property, he said.

"That is a miracle," Abbott said. "It shows that prayers were answered and that preparation paid off."

Read more:

Texas Governor Says State Avoided The Worst Of Laura's Destruction - KNBA

Trump retweets Russian propaganda about Biden that US intel agencies say is intended to influence 2020 election – CNN

Late Sunday, Trump amplified a tweet that contained audiotapes of a 2016 conversation between Biden and then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko -- material that was released earlier this year by Andriy Derkach, a Ukrainian lawmaker named by the US intelligence community in its August 7 statement about Russia's disinformation campaign against Biden. US authorities labeled Derkach's efforts as disinformation because they are intentionally designed to spread false or misleading information about Biden.

By retweeting material that the US government has already labeled as propaganda -- and doing so with the 2020 Democratic National Convention kicking off on Monday -- Trump demonstrated once again that he is willing to capitalize on foreign election meddling for his own political gain.

There is no proof of wrongdoing on the tapes of Biden and Poroshenko. But Trump and his allies, as well as Kremlin-controlled media outlets, have used the tapes to foment conspiracies about Biden's dealings with Ukraine.

Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, responded to Trump's retweet Monday by calling out the President for amplifying Russian disinformation.

"The President of the United States should never be a willing mouthpiece for Russian propaganda," Warner wrote in a tweet of his own.

Trump's amplification of this disinformation comes as Biden is set to accept the Democratic presidential nomination this week, and it poses a significant challenge for US intelligence and national security officials tasked with protecting the 2020 election from foreign interference.

A Twitter spokesman told CNN on Monday that the account Trump retweeted had been suspended "for violations of the Twitter Rules on platform manipulation and spam." The original post, which contained snippets of the Biden tapes, was no longer online as of Monday night.

"I think this mostly just speaks to how widespread Russian talking points have become," said Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University who tracks Russian disinformation, who added that the account appears to be based in the US yet is spreading Kremlin-backed conspiracies.

While relevant US agencies have adopted a whole-of-government approach focused on countering foreign disinformation and seeks to inform the American public about such efforts, there seems to be no plan in place for addressing false information coming from the President himself.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence referred questions about the President's tweets to the White House. The White House responded to CNN's request for comment by directing inquiries to the Trump campaign. The Trump campaign has not responded to CNN's request.

After this story was published, Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates told CNN in a statement that Trump "habitually attacked the sovereignty of American elections" and said the President has "irrevocably shown his true colors yet again" by retweeting Russian propaganda.

"We assess that Russia is using a range of measures to primarily denigrate former Vice President Biden and what it sees as an anti-Russia 'establishment.' This is consistent with Moscow's public criticism of him when he was Vice President for his role in the Obama Administration's policies on Ukraine and its support for the anti-Putin opposition inside Russia," William R. Evanina, director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center, said in a statement earlier this month updating the election threat landscape heading into the November election.

"For example, pro-Russia Ukrainian parliamentarian Andriy Derkach is spreading claims about corruption -- including through publicizing leaked phone calls -- to undermine former Vice President Biden's candidacy and the Democratic Party," Evanina said.

Derkach denies that he's working for the Kremlin.

The anti-Biden content retweeted by Trump ahead of this week's Democratic National Convention was posted by an account with the name "Walt Kowalski," Clint Eastwood's character in the 2008 film "Gran Torino."

The account was created in September 2019, around the same time that the anti-Biden disinformation campaign ramped up, coinciding with the impeachment inquiry into the President. The account has only a few hundred followers, and the user's biography section is solely focused on anti-Biden disinformation.

Kremlin connections

Derkach is among a small group of Ukrainian political figures who have, in recent months, injected themselves into the 2020 US presidential election by releasing and promoting alleged audiotapes of Biden. Some of these figures are connected to Kremlin interests or to Russian intelligence agencies, according to experts and the intelligence community, which says they are part of a Russian-backed misinformation campaign.

The recordings are of Biden's dealings with Poroshenko, the former Ukrainian President, and they appear authentic. But the material reinforces Biden's claims that he promoted US interests and didn't do anything improper in Ukraine. There is no proof of wrongdoing on the tapes, and the Biden campaign maintains that these releases are blatant Russian meddling against the former vice president.

Trump's willingness to capitalize on Russian meddling in the 2020 election is a similar tactic to the one that Trump's campaign embraced in 2016, as Trump advisers strategized around WikiLeaks disclosures that were facilitated by Russia, according to special counsel Robert Mueller.

Four years ago, the first WikiLeaks releases arrived on the eve of the Democratic convention in July 2016, and Trump used the stolen emails to inflame divisions within the Democratic Party, tweeting, "The Wikileaks e-mail release today was so bad to Sanders that it will make it impossible for him to support her." Mueller's investigation later revealed that this intraparty tension was exactly what the Russians were hoping to stoke.

The major difference is that, this time around, the US intelligence community has publicly put Trump and the entire world on notice early on of what the Russians are up to.

Even so, some Republicans and right-wing news outlets have embraced the baseless claims being levied by these controversial Ukrainian figures, some of whom, including Derkach, have worked closely with Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani.

Many of these false narratives being promoted by Derkach and others, and now being amplified by the President, played a central role in his impeachment proceedings. At that time, Fiona Hill, who was Trump's top adviser on Russia, testified that some Republicans were promoting a "fictional narrative" that was concocted by Russian intelligence agencies, and were thus peddling "politically derivative falsehoods that so clearly advance Russian interests."

This story has been updated with comments from a Twitter spokesman.

View post:
Trump retweets Russian propaganda about Biden that US intel agencies say is intended to influence 2020 election - CNN

WikiLeaks – The Podesta Emails

2. Act normal

If you are a high-risk source, avoid saying anything or doing anything after submitting which might promote suspicion. In particular, you should try to stick to your normal routine and behaviour.

If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an investigation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used.

In particular, hard drives retain data after formatting which may be visible to a digital forensics team and flash media (USB sticks, memory cards and SSD drives) retain data even after a secure erasure. If you used flash media to store sensitive data, it is important to destroy the media.

If you do this and are a high-risk source you should make sure there are no traces of the clean-up, since such traces themselves may draw suspicion.

If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you. The Courage Foundation is an international organisation dedicated to the protection of journalistic sources. You can find more details at https://www.couragefound.org.

Originally posted here:

WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails

U.S. Senate report on 2016 election details WikiLeaks Russian ties – VentureBeat

Once hailed as a digital pioneer for bold investigative journalism, Julian Assange and the WikiLeaks organization he founded are painted as tools of Russian propaganda in a bipartisan report by a U.S. Senate committee on 2016 election interference.

Clocking in at almost 1,000 pages, the report (PDF) includes new information about WikiLeaks, as well as material that has been previously reported by news organizations or was disclosed in legal proceedings involving such allies of U.S. President Trump as political consultants Roger Stone and Paul Manafort. The report offers a detailed narrative of how Russian disinformation agencies hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and fed them to WikiLeaks, which then coordinated their release with the Trump campaign.

Assange is currently in a London jail fighting an attempt to extradite him to the U.S., where he is charged with hacking into U.S. government computers. Whether the detailed Senate report on his legal case will have much impact remains to be seen. As of yet, he has not been charged with any crimes related to the leak of the DNC emails or WikiLeaks ties to Russia.

Still, the U.S. government has been trying to make the case in courts that Assange is a hacker and criminal and not a journalist entitled to First Amendment protections. The Senate report offers more details of just how closely Assange has worked with Russian organizations in recent years. That has included, according to the report, helping Russian allies in Belarus and other countries.

WikiLeaks has passed information to U.S. adversaries, including approximately 90,000 U.S. Department of State cables to a Russian national named Israel Shamir, the report says. Shamir in turn provided them to Belarus Aleksandr Lukashenko, an authoritarian leader who relied on the documents to justify the arrest of opposition figures on allegations of spying for the United States.

But the report focuses mainly on the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Founded in 2006, WikiLeaks promised a radical new approach to investigative journalism that would involve leveraging the power of the internet to gather information from anonymous sources and whistleblowers, vet it with the help of crowdsourcing, and then disseminate it. For some early investigations, WikiLeaks partnered with such reliable news organizations as the New York Times to publish its work.

But in 2012 Assange sought asylum in the Ecuadoran Embassy in London to avoid being extradited to Sweden to face rape charges. He was subsequently indicted in the U.S. on hacking and spying charges. The committees report notes that funding for WikiLeaks began to suffer around this time. At some point, Russian sources stepped in to help with funding, including through contracts with RT (formerly Russia Today) that included support for an Assange TV show:

That partnership led to publication of the DNC emails Russias GRU propaganda agency had obtained.

Assange continued to deny that Russia had been the source, hinting that Seth Rich, a DNC staffer whose death has long been the source of right wing conspiracy theories, may have been the leaker. Assange later tried to strike a deal with President Trump to reveal the real source in exchange for assurances Assange would not be prosecuted.

Eventually, Assange established a connection with Stone, who became a conduit to the Trump campaign for information about the WikiLeaks emails and the timing of their release.

But it wasnt just the Trump campaign that coordinated with WikiLeaks. Russian media outlets RT and Sputnik also promoted the release of the leaked emails.

Russia continues to deny it was behind the hacks. And WikiLeaks only response to the Senate report to date is a tweet highlighting a favorable court ruling last year that upheld its right to publish the emails.

For now, Assanges greatest legal jeopardy remains WikiLeaks work in other areas, such as publishing U.S. Iraq War documents and diplomatic cables.

See more here:
U.S. Senate report on 2016 election details WikiLeaks Russian ties - VentureBeat

Russia used Manafort, WikiLeaks to help Trump: Senate report – The Globe and Mail

768px*/@media (min-width:48em) { #fixedpencil { display: block; } #fixedpencil #subspencil .expand-menu-mobile { display: none; } #fixedpencil #subspencil .expand-menu { -webkit-box-flex: 0 0 4.5%; -ms-flex: 0 0 4.5%; flex: 0 0 4.5%; display: -webkit-box; /* OLD - iOS 6-, Safari 3.1-6 */ display: -moz-box; /* OLD - Firefox 19- (buggy but mostly works) */ display: -ms-flexbox; /* TWEENER - IE 10 */ display: -webkit-flex; display: flex; } #fixedpencil .footer-subs .subsCTA.c-button, #fixedpencil .footer-subs .regCTA.c-button { margin: 0 auto; font-size: 0.8rem; padding: .65rem 1.4rem !important; display: inherit; } #fixedpencil #top_subspencil-n .subsCTA-n .c-button { margin: 0 auto; font-size: 0.8rem; padding: .57rem 2rem; } #fixedpencil.n_gold.collapse #subspencil #fixedpencil.expand-menu button svg { fill: #fff; } #fixedpencil.expand #subspencil .expand-menu { top: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; width: 2.5rem; z-index: 99; } #fixedpencil.n_gold.expand { height: 6rem; } #fixedpencil.n_gold.expand #bottom_subspencil-n { display: -webkit-box !important; /* OLD - iOS 6-, Safari 3.1-6 */ display: -moz-box !important; /* OLD - Firefox 19- (buggy but mostly works) */ display: -ms-flexbox !important; /* TWEENER - IE 10 */ display: -webkit-flex !important; display: flex !important; flex-flow: row; flex-wrap: wrap; margin: 0 auto; height: inherit; -webkit-box-flex: 0 0 100%; -ms-flex: 0 0 100%; flex: 0 0 100%; } #fixedpencil.n_gold.expand #bottom_subspencil-n { background: #9f905c; color: #ffff; } #fixedpencil .title-subsrow, #fixedpencil .title-regrow { background: #0000002e; padding: 3px; } #fixedpencil #subspencil .expand-menu button svg, #fixedpencil #subspencil .expand-menu-mobile button svg { left: .58125rem; fill: #333; } .expand .expand-menu, .expand .expand-menu-mobile { background: rgba(197, 197, 197, 0.48); } #fixedpencil #top_subspencil-n, #fixedpencil #bottom_subspencil-n .l-col-sm-0 { display: none !important; } #fixedpencil .footer-subs { display: none; } #fixedpencil #bottom_subspencil-n .l-container { min-width: 90%; } #fixedpencil .title-subsrow, #fixedpencil .title-regrow { font-size: 1.35rem; background: #0000002e; padding: 3px; height: auto; text-align: center; } #fixedpencil #bottom_subspencil-n .l-col-sm-4 { -webkit-box-flex: 0; -ms-flex: 0 0 50%; flex: 0 0 50%; max-width: 50%; padding: 8px; } #fixedpencil .price-subs { font-size: 2.5rem; } #fixedpencil .subs-left-col { border-right: 1px solid #ffffff; } #fixedpencil .pricem-reg, #fixedpencil .pricem-subs { font-size: 0.7rem; -webkit-box-flex: 0 !important; -ms-flex: 0 0 60% !important; flex: 0 0 60% !important; } #fixedpencil .pricem-subs { -webkit-box-flex: 0 !important; -ms-flex: 0 0 30% !important; flex: 0 0 30% !important; } #fixedpencil #bottom_subspencil-n .subsCTA, #fixedpencil #bottom_subspencil-n .regCTA { -webkit-box-flex: 0; -ms-flex: 0 0 40%; flex: 0 0 40%; } #fixedpencil #bottom_subspencil-n .subsCTA .c-button, #fixedpencil #bottom_subspencil-n .regCTA .c-button { padding: .5625rem 1rem; font-size: 0.8rem; } #fixedpencil .price-reg { -webkit-box-flex: 0; -ms-flex: 0 0 20%; flex: 0 0 20%; }}/*Laptop Large > 1024px*/@media (min-width:64em) { #fixedpencil .r-top-containter .subsCTA-n .c-button { padding: 0.6rem; } #fixedpencil .title-regrow div:after { content: 'Get access today to'; } #fixedpencil .pricem-reg:after { content: 'Additional articles, exclusive email newsletters, audio articles and more.'; } . #fixedpencil .subs-right-col { padding-left: 30px !important; } #fixedpencil .subs-left-col { padding-left: 30px !important; } #fixedpencil .price-reg { -webkit-box-flex: 0 0 55%; -ms-flex: 0 0 55%; flex: 0 0 55%; } #fixedpencil .pricem-reg { -webkit-box-flex: 0 0 100% !important; -ms-flex: 0 0 100% !important; flex: 0 0 100% !important; font-size: .9rem; text-align: right; } #fixedpencil .title-subsrow { text-align: left; } #fixedpencil .title-regrow { text-align: right; } #fixedpencil.n_gold.expand { height: 6.5rem; } #fixedpencil.n_gold.expand #bottom_subspencil-n { background: #F2F2F2; color: #000000; } #fixedpencil .subs-left-col { border-right: 0px solid #ffffff; } #fixedpencil .pricem-subs, #fixedpencil .pricem-reg { font-size: 0.9rem; } #fixedpencil .footer-subs { display: flex; } #fixedpencil.n_gold #top_subspencil, #fixedpencil .price-subsrow .subsCTA, #fixedpencil .price-subsrow .regCTA { display: none !important; } #fixedpencil #subspencil .expand-menu-mobile { display: none; } #fixedpencil #subspencil .expand-menu { -webkit-box-flex: 0 0 3.5%; -ms-flex: 0 0 3.5%; flex: 0 0 3.5%; display: -webkit-box; /* OLD - iOS 6-, Safari 3.1-6 */ display: -moz-box; /* OLD - Firefox 19- (buggy but mostly works) */ display: -ms-flexbox; /* TWEENER - IE 10 */ display: -webkit-flex; display: flex; } /*two versions*/ #fixedpencil.n_gold.collapse #top_subspencil-n { visibility: visible; } #fixedpencil.expand { background-color: #9f905c; border-top: 1px solid #cccccc; } /*two versions*/ #fixedpencil.expand.n_gold { height: 13rem; } #fixedpencil.collapse .expand-menu { background: rgba(230, 230, 230, 0.48); } .collapse#fixedpencil #subspencil .expand-menu button svg { fill: #333 !important; } .expand#fixedpencil #subspencil .expand-menu { top: 0; position: absolute; right: 0; width: 2.5rem; z-index: 99; } #fixedpencil.n_gold.expand #bottom_subspencil-n { display: -webkit-box !important; /* OLD - iOS 6-, Safari 3.1-6 */ display: -moz-box !important; /* OLD - Firefox 19- (buggy but mostly works) */ display: -ms-flexbox !important; /* TWEENER - IE 10 */ display: -webkit-flex !important; display: flex !important; flex-flow: row; flex-wrap: wrap; margin: 0 auto; height: inherit; } #fixedpencil { background: transparent !important; border: transparent !important; } #fixedpencil #subspencil { background-color: #9f905c; border-top: 1px solid #cccccc; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc; border-right: 1px solid #cccccc; border-radius: 2px 2px 0px 0px; } #fixedpencil #top_subspencil .subsCTA { padding-right: 4rem; } #fixedpencil #subspencil .expand-menu button svg, #fixedpencil #subspencil .expand-menu-mobile button svg { left: .58125rem; fill: #333; } #fixedpencil.expand .expand-menu, #fixedpencil.expand .expand-menu-mobile { background: rgba(197, 197, 197, 0.48); } #fixedpencil.n_gold #top_subspencil-n { display: flex !important; } #fixedpencil .title-subsrow, #fixedpencil .title-regrow { font-size: 1.25rem; background: transparent; padding: 0px; } #fixedpencil #bottom_subspencil-n .l-container { min-width: 100%; } #fixedpencil .footer-subs { display: flex; } #fixedpencil .pricem-subs { -webkit-box-flex: 0 0 70%; -ms-flex: 0 0 70%; flex: 0 0 70%; } #fixedpencil #bottom_subspencil-n .l-container { min-width: 100%; } #fixedpencil .subs-left-col { padding-left: 15px !important; } #fixedpencil .subs-right-col { padding-right: 15px !important; } #fixedpencil .title-subsrow, #fixedpencil .title-regrow { font-size: 1.35rem; } #fixedpencil #bottom_subspencil-n .l-col-md-4 { -webkit-box-flex: 0; -ms-flex: 0 0 35%; flex: 0 0 35%; max-width: 35%; } #fixedpencil #bottom_subspencil-n .l-col-md-3 { -webkit-box-flex: 0; -ms-flex: 0 0 30%; flex: 0 0 30%; max-width: 30%; display: block !important; } #fixedpencil .footer-subs .l-col-md-2 { -webkit-box-flex: 0; -ms-flex: 0 0 20%; flex: 0 0 20%; max-width: 20%; } #fixedpencil .footer-subs .l-col-md-4 { -webkit-box-flex: 0; -ms-flex: 0 0 30% !important; flex: 0 0 30% !important; max-width: 30% !important; }}@media (min-width: 80em) { #fixedpencil .title-subsrow, #fixedpencil .title-regrow { font-size: 1.6rem; } #fixedpencil .subs-left-col { padding-left: 30px !important; } #fixedpencil .subs-right-col { padding-right: 30px !important; }} ]]>

Excerpt from:
Russia used Manafort, WikiLeaks to help Trump: Senate report - The Globe and Mail

What Senate Intel report says about Trump and Roger Stones 39 phone calls during the 2016 election – Yahoo! Voices

Donald Trump; Roger Stone

Donald Trump and Roger Stone Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images

On August 18, the Senate Intelligence Committee released its bipartisan report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. One of the things addressed in the report is Donald Trump's phone conversations with veteran GOP operative Roger Stone during the election and according to anAugust 19 articleby New York Times reporter Julian E. Barnes, the Senate Intelligence report sheds even more light on those interactions than the Mueller report and Stone's criminal trial.

Barnes notes that according to court records, Stone and Trump had 39 phone conversations from March-November 2016 one of which Barnes describes as "an intriguing phone call, on October 6, 2016, to Mr. Trump."

"According to the Senate report," Barnes explains, "Mr. Stone received a call that afternoon from a number belonging to an aide to Mr. Trump, who regularly used others' phones to make calls. The topic of the conversation was not known, Senate investigators wrote, but they noted that Mr. Stone was focused on a potential WikiLeaks release."

The Senate Intelligence Committee's report concludes, "It appears quite likely that Stone and Trump spoke about WikiLeaks."

In October 2016, WikiLeaks published hacked Democratic e-mails that had been stolen by Russians.

Barnes points out that in its report, the Senate Intelligence Committee "laid out a range of evidence that Mr. Stone was focused on WikiLeaks. He and Mr. Trump had spoken a few days earlier, on September 29, also on the aide's phone. Another campaign aide, Rick Gates, witnessed it and told investigators that the two men discussed WikiLeaks. After that call, Mr. Trump told Mr. Gates that 'more releases of damaging information would be coming.'"

The Times reporter also notes that Stone "said the Senate conclusion that he had discussed WikiLeaks with the president was based solely on testimony by Mr. Gates and Mr. Trump's former lawyer Michael D. Cohen. Mr. Stone called their testimony tainted by agreements with prosecutors to answer their questions."

Story continues

Stone has insisted that he did not know that people connected to the Russian government were behind the stolen Democratic e-mails that WikiLeaks published in October 2016 and that he never discussed WikiLeaks with Trump. Barnes, notes, however, "The Senate report made clear that WikiLeaks, at least, 'very likely' knew the e-mails were coming from Russian intelligence, and that Mr. Stone knew about the most critical WikiLeaks release before it happened."

Stone is among the many Trump associates who has faced criminal charges: he was convicted of charges ranging from witness tampering to lying to Congress and sentenced to 40 months in federal prison by Judge Amy Berman Jackson, a Barack Obama appointee. But Trump commuted Stone's sentence in July, saving him from the prison sentence he was about to begin.

Barnes notes that the Senate Intelligence Committee "rejected Mr. Trump's statement to prosecutors investigating Russia's interference that he did not recall conversations with his long-time friend, Roger J. Stone Jr., about the e-mails, which were later released by WikiLeaks."

In the Mueller report, former special counsel Robert Mueller concluded that the 2016 Trump campaign's interactions with Russians however questionable did not rise to the level of a full-fledged criminal conspiracy. And Barnes points out that the Senate Intelligence report does not accuse Trump of lying. But Barnes also points out that the report "laid out extensive contacts between Trump advisers and Russians" and "detailed even more of the president's conversations with Mr. Stone than were previously known, renewing questions about whether Mr. Trump was truthful with investigators for the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, or misled them."

See the original post here:
What Senate Intel report says about Trump and Roger Stones 39 phone calls during the 2016 election - Yahoo! Voices

Its David v Goliath: Assanges partner launches CrowdJustice appeal to help stop WikiLeaks founders extradition to US – RT

Stella Moris, the partner of Julian Assange, has launched a CrowdJustice campaign to help reinforce the WikiLeaks founders legal defense as it faces new traps set by US prosecutors.

The crowdfunding appeal is designed to help cover the extensive legal costs of the London Magistrates hearings to decide whether Assange will be extradited to the US, where he faces a possible 175-year prison sentence.

The charges leveled against the journalist include conspiracy, vague accusations that he recruited hackers to assist him, violation of the US Espionage Act, and conspiracy to commit computer intrusion for allegedly trying to help ex-US Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning.

At the time of writing, the fund has garnered 6,792 ($8,913) of its 25,000 ($32,809) target in the hour since it was launched.

Moris, who has two sons with Assange, issued the call to arms to fight against extradition and his continuing imprisonment, while warning that the case sets a dangerous precedent for press freedom around the world, especially given that Assange and WikiLeaks exposed US war crimes and human rights abuses.

The Obama administration opted not to prosecute Assange but the Trump administration is pursuing the Australians extradition under 100-year-old US laws, Moris says, adding that no publisher or journalist has been pursued using this legislation, which allows no possibility for defense of public interest.

The 49-year-old has been locked up in Belmarsh Prison in the UK for the past 16 months. He is confined to his cell for up to 23 hours a day, even during the Covid-19 pandemic, with no visitors allowed since his arrest at the Ecuadorian embassy on 11 April 2019.

Charges were initially leveled against the journalist and publisher in April 2019, totalling some 18 counts related to receiving and publishing government documents. However, the prosecution changed the indictment to broaden its reach in July 2020.

This effectively puts the squeeze on the defense team as it scrambles to prepare new legal arguments with already limited and stretched resources, something which Moris has likened to climbing the Himalayas.

Assanges next hearing is slated to begin on September 7 at the Old Bailey.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Read more here:
Its David v Goliath: Assanges partner launches CrowdJustice appeal to help stop WikiLeaks founders extradition to US - RT

WikiLeaks likely knew it helped Russian intelligence in 2016 U.S. election: Senate report – Global News

The WikiLeaks website played a key role in Russias effort to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election in favor of now President Donald Trump and likely knew it was assisting Russian intelligence, a Senate intelligence committee report said on Tuesday.

The report also alleged that former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort collaborated with Russians, including oligarch Oleg Deripaska, before during and after the 2016 U.S. election that pitted Republican Trump against Democrat Hillary Clinton.

The panel found Manaforts role and proximity to Trump created opportunities for Russian intelligence, saying his high-level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services represented a grave counterintelligence threat.

Trending Stories

The assessments were contained in the fifth and final chapter of the Senate Intelligence Committees report on its three-and-a-half year probe of allegations that Russia sought to help Trump defeat Clinton.

Story continues below advertisement

Previous chapters have ratified U.S. spy agencies findings, made public in January 2017, that Russia had sought to help Trump in 2016 by denigrating Clinton, making it harder for her to win, and harming her presidency if she did.

The last chapter of the committee report, released as Trump prepares to face off against Joe Biden in the 2020 election, is likely to be the most definitive public account of the 2016 election controversy.

See the article here:

WikiLeaks likely knew it helped Russian intelligence in 2016 U.S. election: Senate report - Global News

A Murder, a Conspiracy Theory, and the Lies of Fox News – Rolling Stone

He was almost home. In the early-morning hours of July 10th, 2016, Seth Rich walked alone across northwest Washington, D.C., making calls to his friends and family, thinking about his future.

Like so many idealistic twentysomethings, he had moved to the nations capital after college to work in politics. It was the first place hed lived outside of Omaha, and hed gradually found his way, falling in with a group of fellow strivers, biking everywhere, cooking out, and playing soccer on the weekends. A glorified internship at a polling firm led to a job at the Democratic National Committee registering new voters and protecting against voter suppression. Days earlier, hed gotten an offer to join Hillary Clintons presidential campaign in Brooklyn. Sitting in his drafts folder was the start of an acceptance email: All my life I wanted to be in a position that I can make a difference.

Yet he felt conflicted. Taking the Clinton job would mean months away from the people he loved, the life hed built. Earlier that night, he had called his father, Joel, who had already gone to bed. He tried his older brother, Aaron, in Colorado, but they missed each others calls.

It was past two in the morning on the walk home when his girlfriend picked up. She stayed on the phone with him for more than two hours, until he was a block from his front door. She heard voices in the background. I gotta go, Seth calmly said, then hung up.

A neighbor heard gunshots and looked at the clock: 4:19 a.m. The police raced to the scene and found Seth in the street, shot but still breathing, and the paramedics rushed him to the hospital. A few hours later, Seths parents, Joel and Mary, received another call: Their youngest son, Seth Conrad Rich, age 27, was dead.

He was the 67th homicide victim of the year in Washington, D.C. Seths neighborhood had suffered a rash of armed muggings, and there were clues to suggest a physical altercation a rip on his watch wristband, bruising on his hands and face but nothing was taken from him, leading the police to call the crime an attempted robbery gone wrong.

The local news ran a photo of Seth from after he had moved to Washington: Sandy-haired and clean-shaven, dressed in a starter suit and candy-striped tie, he stands with his arms folded and a wry look on his face, the Washington Monument off in the distance. On July 13th, his body was buried at Beth El Cemetery in Omaha. There are no answers for a young man gunned down in the prime of his life, his familys rabbi eulogized. All we have is questions of what could have been, what should have been, and talk of potential greatness for which we will never bear witness.

Ten months later, the cameras went live for the latest episode of Hannity, one of the most-watched cable-news shows in America. As the words Murder Mystery flashed onscreen, Fox News host Sean Hannity, gazing straight into the camera, began his show by informing his audience of explosive developments in a massive breaking news story. The bombshells that he was going to deliver, Hannity told the 2.4 million viewers of his May 16th, 2017, show, could lead to one of the biggest scandals in American history.

That morning, FoxNews.com had published a story claiming the existence of an FBI report that named murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich as the source for thousands of stolen DNC emails published by WikiLeaks in the summer of 2016. U.S. intelligence agencies, members of Congress, and cybersecurity experts had said hackers working for the Russian government carried out the election-year cyberattack on the DNC. But according to Fox, the DNC hack was an inside job and the FBI knew it. The story even quoted a private investigator hired by Richs family who asserted that Rich had sent the emails to WikiLeaks.

Now, let me connect the dots, Hannity told his audience. Hannity was arguably the most influential TV host in America, a friend and confidant to the president of the United States, with whom he spoke regularly. If a disgruntled Democrat had leaked the emails, Hannity said, it could completely shatter the narrative that, in fact, WikiLeaks was working with the Russians, and, further, could mean that Rich was murdered under very suspicious circumstances. Maybe Rich was upset, he went on, that the DNC was conspiring to hurt Bernie Sanders and help Hillary Clinton win the nomination. Later in the show, Hannity interviewed Rod Wheeler, the investigator hired by the Riches and quoted in the Fox News story, who said it sure appears that Rich communicated with WikiLeaks.

Sean McCabe for Rolling Stone

This is the true story of an untrue story. Its the story of how Fox News took a conspiracy theory from the online fringes and mainstreamed it into global news. Its the story of how a Fox News staff writer, a Fox News paid contributor, and a Fox News unpaid commentator worked together to win the trust of a family wracked by grief and then used their imprimatur to publish a sham story that would become an article of faith in MAGA culture. Its the story of how Fox News and some of its biggest stars have so far escaped any accountability for actions whose consequences continue to haunt the Rich family.

This story draws on tens of thousands of pages of court documents and interviews with dozens of key figures, including people close to the Rich family. (The family declined to be interviewed for this story.) The court records include newly revealed text messages, emails, voicemails, and sworn testimony that show how Fox ignored journalistic norms and basic human decency to publish and promote a fiction that could solve the problem of Russias interference in the 2016 election and Trumps welcoming of Russias help. The most generous way to look at it is Fox News didnt do their job, says Kelly McBride, a senior vice president and journalism ethics expert at the Poynter Institute. The less generous way to look at it would be they didnt even try to do their job. And if they didnt even try, the obvious question is Why?

Mary Rich, Seths mother, has described seeing Seths life and death exploited by Fox News as akin to her son being murdered again: We lost his body the first time, and the second time we lost his soul. But instead of grieving, the Rich family has spent the past four years trapped in a never-ending struggle they never wanted to be a part of, a fight to prove a negative: that Seth, a junior-level DNC employee, wasnt actually a secret player in a high-stakes game of geopolitical intrigue. Theyve watched as Seths story has taken on a hideous new life of its own online, where no ones grief is off limits and no amount of evidence can overcome the power of dogma and suspicion. Their fight began in the court of public opinion but has moved to the court of law, a test of whether the victims of viral conspiracy theories and online disinformation can find justice in the social media era.

Aaron Rich saw the rumors first. Within 36 hours of his brothers murder, online commenters were spinning wild theories. It gives me no joy to post this, a Reddit user named kurtchella wrote, but given his position & timing in politics, I believe Seth Rich was murdered by corrupt politicians for knowing too much information on election fraud. As the theories spread, Seths rank-and-file job was incorrectly inflated and kept getting more so with each telling, from a DNC official to a top U.S. Democratic Party official to the person at the DNC in charge of preventing election fraud.

At first, Aaron would later tell an interviewer, he found a morbid humor in this nonsense. We were joking that Seth would be happy if he envisioned a parade of people, his friends and family on one side of the street and conspiracy theorists on the other, he said.

Then the parade turned into a riot. A month after the murder, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange gave an interview in which he dangled Seths name in such a way that made people think Seth was the source of the stolen DNC emails published by WikiLeaks. (A lawyer for Assange did not respond to requests for comment.)

To those who knew Seth best, this was absurd. He was no technical mastermind. He was far more likely to get locked out of his own email account than hack into someone elses, a former colleague tells Rolling Stone.

Still, Assanges comments, and a $20,000 reward offered by WikiLeaks for information about Seths murder, inflamed the conspiracy theories. Joel, Mary, and Aaron were unsure how to respond to the flood of media requests. The Riches were the furthest thing from political insiders, with almost no experience talking to journalists or managing through a crisis. When friends of Seths connected them with a PR consultant named Brad Bauman who offered to help, they readily accepted. Bauman, who tells Rolling Stone he thought he was signing up for a few weeks worth of pro bono work, issued a statement that asked the public to refrain from pushing unproven and harmful theories about Seths murder.

The still-grieving Riches tried to keep their focus on finding the killer. But as the police investigation dragged on month after month, they began to confront the possibility they might never know who killed Seth.

On December 16th, 2016, Joel received a call from a man named Ed Butowsky. A financial adviser who lived in Texas, Butowsky had secured an introduction to Joel from someone who attended the same synagogue as the Riches. He had never met Joel, Mary, or Aaron, but in multiple calls and emails over a span of several months, he said he sympathized with their plight and wanted to help. He eventually offered to pay for a private investigator on behalf of the family to help solve the murder.

From his website, the Riches saw that Butowsky was a successful businessman who appeared on TV and guest-lectured at prominent universities. While they were skeptical of this complete strangers eagerness to assist them, according to people close to the Riches, Butowsky was willing to pay for something Joel and Mary themselves couldnt afford. I couldnt bring myself to tell them not to accept it, Bauman, the familys PR rep at the time, tells Rolling Stone. I honestly feel like this might be one of my greatest failures as a human being ever, because I was in a position where I could have stopped something fucking horrible from happening.

There was more to Butowsky than he let on. Inside Fox, he was seen as a green-room creature, in the words of a former Fox host, a glad-handing backslapper who hobnobbed with the talent and the guests. Everyone knew who Ed was, a former Fox on-air personality tells Rolling Stone. He befriended Fox journalists and introduced them to sources in his network. Behind the scenes, I do a lot of work (unpaid) helping to uncover certain stories, he later told an associate. My biggest work was revealing most of what we know today about Benghazi, referring to the 2012 attack on U.S. facilities in Libya that led to the deaths of four Americans.

The way Butowsky tells it, he took an interest in Seth Rich after a conversation with Ellen Ratner, a journalist he knew from the Fox green room. Ratners late brother was Michael Ratner, a famous civil rights lawyer who had helped lead the Center for Constitutional Rights and was one of WikiLeaks U.S. lawyers. On the eve of the 2016 election, Ratner and her family met with Assange in London. During that meeting, Ratner would later say, Assange claimed the DNC email leak could have come from an internal source or an enemy of the Clintons, and that Russia got credit for something WikiLeaks should have gotten credit for.

Butowsky, however, says Ratner passed along to him another detail from her Assange meeting: that Assange named Seth Rich as his source. However, Ratner, who declined to be interviewed, has said this was false, telling Yahoo News that Richs name never came up in her meeting with Assange and that Butowskys version of events did not happen. (A lawyer for Butowsky sent Rolling Stone an email and a text message between Butowsky and Ratner to corroborate his story, but neither mentions Rich.)

Butowsky says his interest in Rich was further piqued after a phone call with the investigative journalist Seymour Hersh in January 2017. Unbeknownst to Hersh, Butowsky recorded part of their conversation. Hersh said he had somebody on the inside who will go and read a file for me, and hed heard about an FBI report about Rich trying to sell emails to WikiLeaks. Near the end of the call, though, Hersh cautioned that because hed heard something doesnt make it true.

Hersh tells Rolling Stone the information he passed to Butowsky was all just musing that turned out not to be true. While he remains skeptical of the intelligence communitys assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, Hersh says he was trying to get information out of Butowsky, not the other way around. But what Hersh intended as gossip, Butowsky apparently took as gospel.

Butowsky sent the recording of Hersh to the Rich family and even told them to search Seths bank accounts for payments from WikiLeaks. But after the Riches responded that there was no evidence to support that theory, Butowsky offered to pay for a private investigator on their behalf and urged them to hire a man named Rod Wheeler, a former-D.C.-cop-turned-law-enforcement-analyst for Fox News. That Wheeler wasnt a licensed private investigator by day, he worked as a food-safety consultant didnt deter Butowsky. (Butowsky says he interviewed six other potential PIs who were all very expensive, and that Wheeler came recommended by a Fox News analyst he knew.)

Butowsky tells Rolling Stone his motives with the Rich family were simple: He wanted to help a grieving family find closure. But the recording of his conversation with Hersh suggests another reason. At one point, Butowsky tells Hersh he has a great history of getting things out there, where nobody knows that Im the one who did it, and that hes just trying to get something in my hands that I can get public about. If Hershs talk about Rich selling emails to WikiLeaks is true, Butowsky says, it can solve the problem about Russians [being] the ones that gave the emails, because that did not happen.

The Rich Family felt hopeful for the first time in months. Since Butowsky was willing to foot the bill for Wheelers services, they didnt have to stress about costs. Joel and Aaron spoke with Wheeler and came away encouraged.

The family didnt have access to powerful attorneys, and so Aarons wife, Molly, a lawyer, helped write a contract and negotiate the terms. A key sticking point was Wheelers proposal to serve as the familys media representative. The Riches declined and insisted that their agreement with Wheeler include strict confidentiality terms.

As the negotiations played out for more than a week, Butowsky seemed to grow anxious and discussed how to kick-start the Riches into finalizing the agreement with Wheeler, according to court documents. If you dont get the agreement back this morning, Im going to leave Joel a nice but somewhat uncomfortable message, Butowsky texted Wheeler on March 14th, 2017.

Later that day, Wheeler and the Riches signed the contract. The final agreement noted that Butowsky would pay for Wheelers services and forbid Wheeler from discussing his investigation with third parties without the familys permission including Butowsky.

I told you youre wasting time, Rod, Butowsky said to Wheeler over the phone one day in the spring of 2017, according to testimony by Wheeler.

Wheeler was walking the streets of Washingtons LeDroit Park neighborhood, a few blocks from where Rich was shot, talking to people and looking for tips, when Butowsky called him. But when Wheeler explained that these were the fundamentals of a murder investigation, his benefactor grew angry. Im not going to need to use you if you dont, you know, if you dont do like I told you, Wheeler testified Butowsky told him. (Butowsky denies this, telling Rolling Stone that Ive never said anything like that to Wheeler.)

A goateed man in his late fifties with a nasally Midwestern accent and a thick build, Wheeler tells Rolling Stone he wouldnt have paid any attention to Butowsky if Butowsky hadnt touted his connections to Fox News. Wheeler had worked as a paid law-enforcement analyst at Fox for more than a decade and was typically introduced on-air by Fox hosts as a former D.C. homicide detective, even though he had never earned the rank of detective, according to a spokeswoman for the D.C. police department.

Whatever his gumshoe credentials, Wheeler says he kept his focus on solving Richs murder. But text messages and emails filed in court show Wheeler had ambitions of his own. Ive got to find a way on the Trump team, he texted Butowsky on April 12th, 2017, floating the idea of working at FEMA. Butowsky responded by sending Wheeler contact information for then-White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer. In another text produced in court, Butowsky told Wheeler that once we get the story out, you will be one of the most recognize[d] names in America.

Despite his confidentiality agreement with the Rich family, Wheeler kept Butowsky updated on the status of his investigation, according to text messages and emails filed in court. Their correspondence shows a pattern in which Butowsky consistently shows more interest in absolving the Russians of the DNC hack than in helping the Riches solve Seths murder. With the familys help, Wheeler secured an interview with Joseph Della-Camera, the D.C. detective leading the investigation into Seths murder, and made sure Butowsky knew about it. The night before the interview, Butowsky sent Wheeler an email: Della-Camera is either helping us or we will go after him as being part of the coverup.

Reward money and media attention are typically the two best ways to generate leads and informants in a difficult murder investigation. The Riches were a middle-class family. Mary, the familys chief breadwinner, had lost her job shortly before Seths death. They didnt have the wealth to put up more reward money, and so they took most interview requests that came their way, whether from The Washington Post or the Daily Mail tabloid. They invited a TV crew from Crime Watch Daily into their home.

These efforts to keep Seths name in the news were sometimes turned against them. Photos of Seth provided by the family to reporters were repurposed into conspiratorial memes. A video of Joel and Mary thanking people who had donated to a GoFundMe page was twisted into evidence that the family supported the self-anointed online sleuths pushing wild theories about Seth. Their attitude in the early stages was Well talk to anybody because bringing more attention to this is the only thing that will get it solved, the former colleague of Seths tells Rolling Stone. Some people were well-intentioned and some werent.

When a FoxNews.com reporter named Malia Zimmerman emailed Joel in January in hopes of writing a feature story about Seth to bring further attention to his case, Joel agreed to cooperate. The reporter asked about Seths life and his work at the DNC, but also pressed Joel on the WikiLeaks theory, which he vehemently denied. A few days later, the story appeared: Slain DNC Staffers Father Doubts WikiLeaks Link as Cops Seek Answers.

Joel felt stung. The Riches decided they would decline to participate in future stories with Fox News, and with Zimmerman in particular.

GOP activist and greenroom creature Ed Butowsky.

AP Photo/LM Otero

There had been a third recipient on Butowskys part of the coverup email: Malia Zimmerman, who was working with Butowsky and Wheeler without the Rich familys knowledge. Before one of Wheelers first calls with Joel Rich, Butowsky urged him to [m]ake sure to play down Fox News, dont mention you know Malia. Throughout the spring of 2017, Zimmerman kept chasing the story of Seth Rich and WikiLeaks. Emails filed in court including Butowskys coverup email show that Zimmerman kept hitting dead ends. A spokeswoman for the FBIs Washington Field Office said its agents were not assisting now and have not assisted in the past on any case related to Rich. The D.C. police denied Zimmermans request for any crime-scene footage, citing the ongoing murder investigation. And Della-Camera, the detective assigned to the Rich murder case, told Wheeler hed seen no evidence to support the theories about Rich and WikiLeaks, according to Wheelers notes on the meeting later filed in court.

But with the addition of Wheeler, Zimmerman had a new way to get information. She described Wheelers final contract with the family as a win because it didnt limit his investigation to a street crime, presumably meaning he could pursue other, more politically motivated theories for the murder. She sent him a list of questions for the family and urged him to get access to Seths email and social media accounts. (Wheeler would later ask Zimmerman if he could share with a Fox News executive in New York the fact that we are working together on an investigation in an effort to secure a permanent job at Fox.)

The other conduit for Zimmerman was Butowsky himself. Cellphone records filed in court show that between December 2016 and June 2017, Zimmerman and Butowsky spoke by phone 571 times and exchanged 480 text messages. (Butowsky tells Rolling Stone he and Zimmerman spoke about many subjects unrelated to Rich.) On April 29th, Zimmerman sent a full draft of her story to Butowsky. According to an email filed in court, Zimmerman told Butowsky, I need to confirm the bold sections in the draft. The bolded sections were the most explosive ones: that unnamed investigators had discovered emails between Rich and WikiLeaks during a forensic search of his work computer, and that Rich leaked the emails possibly to expose the [DNCs] bias against Sanders. It appeared, in other words, that she had written the story she wanted to publish before having the sourcing to back it up.

Butowsky, Zimmerman, and Wheeler looked to prominent Republicans for help. But a White House meeting with Sean Spicer didnt amount to anything. Next, Butowsky and Zimmerman turned to Congressman Devin Nunes, a staunch Trump ally and then-chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

Nunes had already been on their list of possible sources. In a March 31st email filed in court, Zimmerman told Butowsky and Wheeler that Nunes needs to help us. Butowsky wrote back, I will get very aggressive with Devin over the weekend. In early May, Butowsky helped arrange a meeting between Wheeler and Kash Patel, an investigator for Nunes on the Intelligence Committee. Butowsky texted Wheeler that the main goal with Patel was to get him to get the FBI record and give us a wink to go story [sic] that the emails are there.

Whatever FBI record or wink Butowsky was hoping for, Wheeler tells Rolling Stone that he didnt get it. For his part, Butowsky says Wheeler and Patel met to discuss getting whistleblower protection for Della-Camera, who, according to Butowsky, wanted to expose the coverup. However, a spokeswoman for the D.C. police says Della-Camera never sought such status. (Patel, who did not respond to requests for comment, went on to work for the Trump White Houses National Security Council and then as an adviser in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.)

Just when it seemed like Wheelers investigation was going nowhere, he got a call from Butowsky and Zimmerman on May 10th, court records show. They claimed they had found a source for their Rich-WikiLeaks allegation.

Court records dont say who this source was or if he or she even existed. But one email filed in court offers a clue about the information this supposed source might have provided. On May 11th, Zimmerman wrote to the CEO of a cybersecurity company that reliable sources had told her Rich may have been killed in a hit by Romanian hackers as revenge for selling the DNC emails to WikiLeaks. Her sources said there might be information about Rich and WikiLeaks on the dark web, Zimmerman explained, and she asked the CEO to search the dark web for her. The search turned up nothing, emails show.

Still, with one source supposedly secured, Butowsky pressured Wheeler to finish his investigation. On May 14th, Butowsky left a voicemail for Wheeler: We have the full attention of the White House on this. And tomorrow lets close this deal. He also sent a text: Not to add any more pressure but the president just read the article. He wants the article out immediately. Its now all up to you. But dont feel the pressure. (The White House has denied any involvement or knowledge of Zimmermans story. Butowsky says these comments were just bluster and that he has never spoken with President Trump.)

The following day, Zimmerman called Wheeler to tell him that her bosses at Fox want her to go with the story, Wheeler later testified. Throughout that day, Zimmerman sent Wheeler and Butowsky several drafts of her story. The only source cited besides an unnamed federal investigator was Wheeler himself, and the draft now included two on-the-record quotes from Wheeler that had not appeared in earlier versions. Wheeler also texted Zimmerman a third quote to use, court records show: I do strongly believe that the answers to who murdered [Rich] sits on his computer on a shelf at the [MPDC] or FBI headquarters!

Early on the morning of May 16th, 2017, Butowsky gave a heads-up to a group of producers and hosts at Fox about Zimmermans forthcoming story:

The story is or will be up very early tomorrow morning. Rod Wheeler is up and ready to give interviews. If you have any questions about the story or more information needed, call me. Im actually the one whos been putting this together but as you know I keep my name out of things because I have no credibility. One of the big conclusions we need to draw from this is that the Russians did not hack our computer systems and ste[a]l emails and there was no collusion like trump with the Russians.

Butowsky also sent talking points to Wheeler, according to text messages later filed in court: The narrative in the interviews you might use is that your and Malias work prove that the Russians didnt hack into the DNC and steal the emails and impact our election.

On the morning of Tuesday, May 16th, 2017, Brad Bauman, the Rich familys spokesman, began his day by checking the Drudge Report, the widely read news-aggregation site, and saw Seth Rich staring back at him on the page. It was the same photo of Rich that circulated after the murder wry grin, arms folded, Washington Monument in the distance. But now the photo appeared next to a very different headline: Dead DNC Staffer Had Contact With WikiLeaks.

Drudge linked not to Zimmermans story but to an interview Wheeler had given to the local Fox affiliate for D.C., which quoted him saying it was confirmed that Rich had exchanged emails with WikiLeaks. (Wheeler has said he intended the interview to be a teaser for Zimmermans story; instead, the local Fox affiliate used it to scoop Fox News.) By 8 a.m., FoxNews.com had published Zimmermans story. It claimed that Seth had been the source for all 44,053 emails and 17,761 documents stolen from the DNC and published by WikiLeaks. Zimmermans story cited two sources: an anonymous federal investigator who had read a purported FBI report about Richs contacts with WikiLeaks, and Wheeler, identified as a private investigator hired by Richs family to probe the case.

The two spurious stories blazed across the internet. A flurry of follow-up coverage appeared on news outlets around the world. Watching Seths name ricochet yet again across the internet in connection with a cruel conspiracy theory was like living in a nightmare you can never wake up from, Joel and Mary later said. The pain was unbearable.

The Riches also felt betrayed. Joel and Mary kept saying to themselves, How can they be saying this? Bauman, the familys PR rep, tells Rolling Stone. People we trusted how could they be going against us?

Bauman went into rapid-response mode. Any new story about Seth that the family didnt respond to right away would metastasize. But even if they refuted every new story that appeared, it wasnt clear whether anything they did could undo the damage.

As the Riches tried to fight back, Bauman found himself a target. On Twitter, he was called a hatchet man and a fixer who the DNC assigned to the family to hide the truth about Seth. Bauman says hes never worked for the DNC, his name doesnt appear in any DNC payment records, and he says the decision to help the family was his alone. Still, he says, his phone pinged with authentication alerts as people apparently tried to access his email account. Strangers called in the middle of the night and told him, We know what you did, before hanging up.

Rod Wheeler/Twitter, Fox News

Shortly after its publication, Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy read from Zimmermans story live on-air. It seems very suspicious, co-host Ainsley Earhardt chimed in. You know whats interesting that the parents arent pursuing it. Laura Ingraham, who joined the segment remotely, chimed in to blast the frothing media for its aggressive lack of curiosity in the story. By 9 a.m. on the day Zimmermans story appeared, Fox had run four different segments about the allegation that Rich was WikiLeaks source.

Yet within hours, Zimmermans story was unraveling. The D.C. police told The Washington Post that there was nothing that we can find that any of this is accurate. A former law-enforcement official with firsthand knowledge of Richs laptop told NBC News the computer never contained any emails related to WikiLeaks, and the FBI never had it. And in a bizarre twist, Wheeler tried to distance himself from his own quotes, telling CNN he had no evidence to suggest Rich had contacted WikiLeaks before his death.

By that afternoon, Fox had recast Zimmermans story to focus on the Rich familys statement that disputed the report. But the post still alleged Seth conspired with WikiLeaks. Joel wrote to Zimmerman on May 18th to ask Fox News to retract, and Zimmerman replied that Fox was reviewing our story in the interest of ensuring fairness and accuracy.

Butowsky, for his part, proposed going on the offensive to defend the story, according to court records. On a May 19th call with Wheeler, Butowsky said he had a friend who would send the journalist Seymour Hersh a clip of Hersh and Butowskys conversation from January the one Butowsky recorded without telling Hersh along with an ultimatum to give up his supposed FBI source: If you dont give us that in three hours, a full recording of everything we have will be at every news agency tonight with your name and phone number on it, Butowsky described his plan to Wheeler, according to court records. If you give it to us, you will never hear from us again. (Butowsky has affirmed in court that he suggested this plan, but it does not appear to have happened.)

As one part of Fox News was scrambling to figure out what had happened, Foxs loudest voice, Sean Hannity, continued to amplify the piece. Day after day, he built a larger and larger edifice atop a report whose foundations were crumbling. Even as the story started to fall apart, Hannity insisted that he was not backing off. He would continue asking these questions about Richs murder because the media is trying to destroy a sitting president.

Hannity was far from the only Fox pundit pushing the Rich-WikiLeaks report. Fox Business host Lou Dobbs hyped Zimmermans story. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich said during an appearance on Fox & Friends that Rich apparently was assassinated at four in the morning, having given WikiLeaks something like 23,000 Im sorry 53,000 emails and 17,000 attachments. Gingrich added, Nobody is investigating that. And what does that tell you about what was going on? Because it turns out, it wasnt the Russians.

At one point, the online conspiracy theories and Hannitys championing practically converged. An anonymous commenter on the 4chan message board claimed, without citing any evidence, that the Seth Rich case has scared the shit out of certain high-ranking current and former Democratic Party officials. Hours later, Hannity tweeted to his millions of followers that Complete panic has set in at the highest levels of the Democratic Party.

And then, as if things couldnt get more bizarre, a Finnish German hacker who goes by Kim Dotcom injected himself into the controversy. Dotcom, whose real name is Kim Schmitz and who had fled to New Zealand to avoid extradition to the U.S. for racketeering charges, tweeted that he had evidence Rich worked with WikiLeaks. Hannity invited Dotcom to appear on his show. Buckle up destroy Trump media, Hannity tweeted. Sheep that u all are!!!

On May 23rd, a week after it was first published and went viral, Fox retracted Zimmermans story. A statement posted on FoxNews.com said it was not initially subjected to the high degree of editorial scrutiny we require for all of our reporting. A former Fox executive told the Daily Beast: Retraction. Wow. Roger [Ailes] would brag at meetings how he was proud Fox never had to print a retraction.

Hannity was unmoved. All you in the liberal media, he said on his radio show, I am not Fox.com or FoxNews.com. I retracted nothing. Porter Berry, Hannitys executive producer, received a letter from Aaron Rich urging him not to put Kim Dotcom on air. We appeal to your decency to not cause a grieving family more pain and suffering, Aaron wrote.

An audience of millions tuned in for Hannitys May 23rd show. But there would be no interview with Dotcom. Hannity said he had communicated with the Rich family. Out of respect for the familys wishes, for now, I am not discussing this matter at this time, he said at the start of the show. He did not, however, apologize to the family or retract anything he had said. And in a since-deleted tweet sent after that nights show, he left the door cracked just enough to keep the conspiracy theory alive: Ok TO BE CLEAR, I am closer to the TRUTH than ever. Not only am I not stopping. I am working harder. Updates when available. Stay tuned!

Three years later, Foxs Seth Rich story and the conspiracy theory it was based on and amplified have been widely discredited by findings of the U.S. government, including Trumps Justice Department and two Republican-led congressional investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicted 12 Russian intelligence agents for the cyberattacks on the DNC and the Clinton campaign, and his final report accuses Assange and WikiLeaks of making statements designed to obscure the source of the DNC leaks and of having implied falsely that Rich was his source. More recently, the FBIs section chief in charge of records testified in court that the bureau had searched for any records about Seth Rich or his murder and found nothing.

Further evidence produced in court casts even more doubt on Fox News now-retracted May 16th story about Rich and WikiLeaks. The evidence suggests Zimmerman may not have spoken with the anonymous federal investigator in her report. In a voicemail message produced in court, Butowsky told Wheeler that one reason Fox pulled the story is because Malia did not actually speak to someone. She heard. In a deposition, Wheeler testified Zimmerman told him she did not physically speak to the FBI source. Someone else did.

But the people who assembled Foxs Rich-WikiLeaks story, and the network that published and broadcast it, have escaped accountability so far. After the retraction, Jay Wallace, the networks president of news, said the story was being investigated internally. (He also said it was completely erroneous that Fox published Zimmermans story to help detract from the alleged Trump collusion with Russia.) Yahoo News last year cited a source knowledgeable about the inquiry who said Zimmermans responses about the federal investigator caused some editors at the network to question whether the source was in fact who she said he was, or even whether he existed. But the findings of Foxs investigation have never been released, and a Fox spokeswoman would only say that Zimmermans story was published to the website without review by or permission from senior management.

Hannity is still on TV every weeknight and is one of the most-watched cable-news hosts. Malia Zimmerman is still employed by Fox News, but hasnt published a piece under her byline since August 2017. Her first story about Rich, published in January 2017, was also removed from FoxNews.com without explanation. (Citing ongoing litigation, Fox declined interview requests with Zimmerman, Wallace, and Hannity.)

To this day, Butowsky insists Zimmermans story is accurate. He says that Joel and Mary Rich are not innocent bystanders and are in possession of material evidence indicating that Seth Rich downloaded the DNC emails, sent them to Wikileaks, and requested payment, which Joel and Mary have denied. He did not provide evidence to support those claims. He says Zimmerman, who has described him in court filings as one of her sources, had her own source and thats who she relied on for the story. Butowsky says he was sitting next to Refet Kaplan, a top editor at FoxNews.com, when Kaplan was told to retract Zimmermans story at the request of Kathryn Murdoch, the wife of James Murdoch and daughter-in-law of Rupert Murdoch, the chairman of Fox News parent company, News Corp. (A Fox News spokeswoman denied this allegation, saying there was zero evidence to back it up. James and Kathryn Murdoch declined to comment.) Butowsky has sued journalists, news organizations, and even lawyers for the Rich family. Im going to sue the hell out of a lot of firms, he told a reporter. I want to see these people choke on their nerves and go through the same crap I had to go through.

Wheeler, after working in lockstep with Butowsky and Zimmerman for months, turned around and sued Fox News and Butowsky. He alleged that the quotes attributed to him in Zimmermans story were fabricated and that hed been defamed and suffered damage to his reputation and his livelihood. Wheelers suit which was later dismissed created a public record of text messages, emails, and other communications that revealed for the first time the months-long coordination between him, Butowsky, and Zimmerman.

Mr. Butowsky, Aaron Rich began his letter. It is a new year, and I wish that I could say I was able to enjoy the holidays but I was distracted due to you tweeting yet another lie about me. On the next line, Aaron included the image of a tweet sent by Butowsky. It accused the outgoing deputy director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, of covering up the FBIs purported investigation into Seths murder and then added a new detail to the Seth Rich conspiracy theory: that the stolen DNC files had been downloaded by Aaron and Seth together.

Seth with his older brother, Aaron, at Aarons wedding in 2015, where Seth served as the best man.

Courtesy of the Rich family

In the aftermath of Fox News retraction, Aaron watched with growing alarm as Butowsky shifted his focus to him. Butowsky contributed to an op-ed published in The Washington Times, court records show, that said it was well-known in the intelligence circles that Seth and Aaron downloaded the DNC emails and were paid by Wikileaks for that information. (The op-ed was later retracted and the Times apologized.) Butowsky fed information to a pro-Trump blogger who alleged that Aaron had obstructed the law-enforcement investigation into Seths murder and had advance knowledge about Seths murder but did nothing to stop it. A huge thanks to Ed Butowsky, the blogger announced to his followers. Hes one of my sources, America.

Aaron, court records show, found himself sucked into the same vortex of online smears and lies that had sullied his brothers memory. He woke up every day wondering what fresh lies had been spread about him while he slept. He received death threats and vicious online harassment, installed security cameras at his home, and sought psychological treatment for anxiety. It went on like that for months, and Aaron pleaded with Butowsky to stop.

These claims are absolutely false and ridiculous, not to mention painful and harmful, Aaron wrote in his letter dated January 12th, 2018. I try to live my life as a private person, but every time you tweet out lies like this about me, it brings unwanted attention, scorn, and ridicule to my personal and professional life. Aaron asked Butowsky to retract all of the lies you have told about me and my family and to publicly apologize. No apology was given.

On March 13th, 2018, Joel and Mary Rich sued Fox News, Butowsky, and Zimmerman. Their lawsuit alleges intentional infliction of emotional distress, asserting Fox, Butowsky, and Zimmerman intentionally exploited the tragedy of Seths murder, including through lies, misrepresentations, and half-truths with disregard for the obvious harm that their actions would cause Joel and Mary.

Two weeks later, Aaron sued Butowsky and a pro-Trump blogger for defamation and conspiracy in a Washington, D.C., court. A district court judge dismissed Joel and Marys suit only for an appeals court to reverse that decision, writing in part: We have no trouble concluding that taking their allegations as true the Riches plausibly alleged what amounted to a campaign of emotional torture. To defend itself, Fox News argues in court that Zimmermans story was not a sham and that Fox did not engage in outrageous behavior because it was pursuing a story that was substantially true.

The lawsuits filed by Joel, Mary, and Aaron Rich which could go to trial as early as 2021 pose a larger question: Is justice possible for the victims of online abuse and harmful lies? In a time when the president of the United States tosses off conspiracy theories on Twitter about public and private people, and when disinformation can reach millions of people online in an instant, its a question that has implications for all of us.

The Riches believe their suits also represent their best hope for closure and for restoring Seths reputation. The conspiracy theories about Seth and Aaron will live on at the fringes of the internet. But accountability in court could give the family the space to return to that brief moment after Seths murder when their grief belonged to them and them alone, and when they could mourn Seth in peace.

Follow this link:

A Murder, a Conspiracy Theory, and the Lies of Fox News - Rolling Stone