Open source software can be used, modified and distributed by anyone who has the knowledge to work with code.

Businesses are constantly searching for digital solutions to help them run more efficiently and turn bigger profits faster.

And one common term they may or may not have heard of that can further this agenda is open-source software.

In this article, you will find out what open source software is and get familiar with the most required types.

Whats more, we will also discover the best open source software examples of 2020.

The term open source was introduced in the late 1990s by The Open Source Initiative (OSI).

Open-source software is, essentially, a software solution whose code is publically available and free for its users and anyone else who is able to use, modify and distribute in various formats.

Open-source software solutions don't always solve the same problems. In fact, most open-source software is geared towards different niche solutions.

However, because it is accessible to the general public, it is typically very easy to obtain and incorporate into digital solutions.

Now, it is important to remember that just because open source software is free to use, it doesn't mean that just anyone can use it. Open-source software refers to lines of code (and its variations) that are available.

So, depending on the type of this software, you'll likely still need a qualified software developer to inspect that code, customize the software to your specifications, and integrate it into your current operations.

Very often free source software is used as a synonym with open source software.

Though similar, these two are different types of software.

Both of them offer similar licenses but share different ideologies.

Richard Stallman introduced the concept of free source software back in the 1980s. Its main goal was that all users have the right to operate, copy, share, study, change, and improve this software.

Open source software, on the other hand, was introduced in the late 1990s by a group of individuals as a reaction to the limitations of free source software.

The main difference they presented was that they changed the emphasis from freedom to security. And, they also brought other pragmatic benefits like transparency and cost savings.

All free source software can qualify as open source software. However, not all open source software can be free.

For instance, Open Watcom is an integrated development environment whose license cannot be modified and used privately.

Open source software licenses allow users and commercial companies to run, modify and share different sets of software code.

In other words, these licenses are legal contracts between the creator and the user. They imply that anyone with a license can use the software under specific conditions.

They are mostly available free of charge and sometimes may have restrictions.

For example, users may be confined to preserve the name of the authors. Or, it may also happen that they are not able to redistribute the licensed software under the same license only.

There are over 200 licenses of this type.

Here are the most popular:

Before you start using any open source code, understand the types of licenses and its rules to stay compliant.

Looking for the top software development companies in the US?

Here are some of the most popular types of open source software:

CRM (customer relationship management) software allows companies to manage customer interactions and meet their requirements easier.

In other words, it helps businesses improve customer care which is essential in boosting client satisfaction and bringing profitability.

This software makes it possible to stay organized and boost your productivity as well. There are different open source examples for CRM and they are usually free to download.

However, they do require technical ability to use and are customizable to your needs.

The best free open source CRM solutions in 2020 are:

These top three software examples for CRM also offer paid versions that come with an extended list of features. You can visit their websites for more info.

Open source project management software can be of great assistance in keeping track of assignments and tasks.

They allow you to manage different projects at the same time and stay organized.

Most of the open source project management tools on the market are free and offer paid versions as well.

Here are the top three of them:

Open source project management software is important in enhancing the business performance since it makes collaboration easier and delegating tasks simpler.

Most of the open source video games are free to use and modify. Developers and game designers can freely share them across platforms.

Many of these games are also incorporated in Linux distributions by default. And, users can download and install the more popular ones on other platforms like Mac OS and Windows.

Some of the open source video games may be under restrictive licenses as well.

Here are the best open source software examples of video games in 2020:

Blockchain open source is a software that users run to record transactions between two parties.

Thus, every time someone makes a transaction, the information is documented on a spreadsheet to which all the participants have access to.

However, its downside is that it cannot be modified and users actually agree via consensus to add data on the platform.

Whats great about this software, on the other hand, is that it is secure.

Blockchain software mainly targets the financial sector. But it is also widely used by eCommerce businesses, in online voting, e-governance, etc.

These are the most popular blockchain open source software examples of 2020:

Looking for the top software development companies in Massachusetts?

Mozilla Firefox is a customizable internet browser and a free open source software. It offers thousands of plugins that are accessible with a single click of your mouse.

The platform holds 4.39% of the worldwide browser market share and it is available for Android, iOS, Windows and Linux.

According to CNET, Mozilla reshaped the technology industry and fanned the flames of open source software that changed the way social networks and operating systems function.

LibreOffice is a complete office suite that offers presentations, documents, spreadsheets and databases.

Unlike Microsoft Office, which is not accessible for everyone due to its pricing model, LibreOffice is totally free.

To support it, its users can make donations when they download. So, it has a huge community of contributors.

It is available for Mac, Linux and Windows and it also has a live chat and a forum where you can turn to when searching for help.

Another of the best open software source examples that is worth mentioning is the photo editing tool GIMP.

It offers similar features like some of the expensive tools on the market including various filters and effects, and yet it is free.

GIMP is available across different platforms including Windows and Linux and it has different 3d party plugins and customization options.

Plenty of illustrators, graphic designers and photographers use it to improve their pictures and enhance their work.

VLC Media Player is one of the most popular open source software examples that you can use for free.

This multimedia player is used for video, media and audio files and it plays discs, webcams, streams and devices. Most of the users use it for streaming podcasts as well.

It allows you to optimize your audio and video files for a particular hardware configuration and also offers a plethora of extensions and skins which allows you to create customized designs.

Whats more, it runs on different platforms such as Android, Mac OS X, Linux, Windows, iOS and more.

[Image source: Linux]

According to a Stack Overflow survey, 83.1% of developers claimed that Linux is the most wanted platform.

Linux is one of the most user-friendly open source software on the market. It is most commonly used on Android devices and desktops.

What makes this operating system different from the others is that it costs nothing and it is incredibly customizable.

Most companies also choose it because it is secure because of the excellent support its community offers.

Blender is another of the best open source software examples of 2020.

It is a 3D graphics and animation tool that supports motion tracking, simulation, animation, video editing, rendering, modeling and much more.

It also offers a set of modeling tools and features including real-time viewpoint prereview, multi-resolution and support for Planar tracking and Tripod solvers.

GNU Compiler Collection is a collection of compilation tools for software development in the C, C++, Ada, Fortran and other programming languages.

It provides high-quality releases regularly and works with native and cross targets.

The sources it offers are freely available via weekly snapshots as well as SVN.

Python is common programming and scripting language used by custom software developers.

According to IEEE, it was the most popular language in 2019. In recent years, it attracts plenty of new users because of its fast-growing field of machine learning.

It is also easy to use which is why most of the developers also choose this open source software.

When talking about the best open source software examples of 2020, we shouldnt miss PHP.

It is a software development language used for creating websites and other digital platforms.

It is fast and flexible and powers some of the most popular websites around the globe including Slack and Spotify.

Shotcut is a video editor that offers powerful features including audio and webcam capture, color, text, noise, and counter generators, support of popular image formats, EDL export and much more.

It is a great tool to edit your audio and video files with and it is available for Windows, macOS and Linux.

On its website, you can also find great resources and tutorials on how to use this free open source software.

Here are the top five software development companies on the market that you can choose for your next project:

Location: Massachusetts

Notable clients: Lionbridge, Accenture, Bayer HealthCare

Website: https://www.kandasoft.com/

Kanda Software is a custom software development and quality assurance agency serving both Fortune 500 companies and dynamic startups. They have worked on more than 2000 projects and partnered with clients from around the globe.

Some of the industries they have experience in are healthcare, retail and technology.

Location: Boston

Notable clients: Level Up, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Conformis

Website: htts://www.thegnar.co/

The Gnar Company is a software consultancy that specializes in software development. It creates robust, reliable products for various industries including technology, healthcare and eCommerce.

The company has enterprise-level engineering experience and works with businesses of different sizes, from small startups to large enterprises.

Location: Colorado

Notable clients: Expedia, Xerox, Toyota

Website: https://www.itransition.com/

iTransition is a full-service software development company that helps brands bring their ideas to life. It partners with large and medium-sized companies as well as startups.

Visit link:
The Best 10 Open Source Software Examples Of 2020

Commentary: A new survey suggests many get it wrong when they assume companies choose open source to avoid lock-in.

Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Every enterprise uses open source, but the reasons for doing so often vary depending on one's role within the enterprise. Anaconda, a popular data science platform with over 20 million users, surveyed its users to better understand the current state of data science adoption, including open source's role therein. Among other findings, developers value open source so they can get work done right now, while their colleagues may value the price tag or utility.

But exactly no group puts "avoiding vendor lock-in" as their first (or even fourth) consideration for using open source. Open source can help companies achieve multi-cloud strategies, but by itself open source doesn't magically make any workload portable. That's simply not how open source (or enterprise) software works.

The good news is that no one seems to be waiting around on the "avoiding lock-in" argument.

SEE:How to build a successful developer career (free PDF)(TechRepublic)

As noted in the report, the survey respondents were asked to assign a proportional value to each of five commonly-cited benefits of open source software. Of the five, "most suitable tool for my needs" and "speed of innovation" claimed the most points, with "avoiding vendor lock-in" scraping into last place (Figure A).

Figure A

Image: Anaconda

If you've been paying attention to open source over the years, these numbers won't be surprising. The closer the respondent is to the code itself, the more they care about the speed of innovation that open source enables, and the less they fret about lock-in. "Lock-in" is something vendors talk about--customers don't seem to obsess over it in the same way.

Don't believe me? Over the past few decades while open source has been booming, we've seen proprietary databases, ERP systems, etc. boom right alongside it. Indeed, over the 20 years I've worked for open source companies, I have almost never had a customer "vote" against lock-in with their wallets.

This is not to say that companies aren't buying into open source in a big way--they are. It's just that "no lock-in" is the puniest of reasons for doing so.

Instead, organizations have long chosen open source to save money while boosting innovation, with the latter reason by far the more compelling. You'd struggle to find companies using TensorFlow to help with their machine learning aspirations because "it's free"--they use it because it's a great way to do things like fraud detection, as PayPal has found. Others like Twitter turn to Redis not because it's free, but because it helps the company achieve dramatic scale.

And so on.

Developers, closest to the code, figured this out long ago--that's why they picked "speed of innovation" at roughly twice the rate of any other open source benefit. I recently discussed whether open source drives business innovation with Weaveworks CTO Cornelia Davis: "No one cares about lock-in if the software isn't very good. The first order of priority is that most want super innovative software." That's what open source increasingly delivers.

Disclosure: I work at AWS, but this article reflects my views, not those of my employer.

From the hottest programming languages to the jobs with the highest salaries, get the developer news and tips you need to know. Weekly

Read the rest here:
Open source success has everything to do with innovation, not vendor lock-in concerns - TechRepublic

This research report studies and gauges through the current market forces that replicate growth trajectory and holistic growth trends.

Aligning with changing market scenario in the wake of COVID-19 outbreak , this in-depth research offering shares a clear perspective of resultant output that tend to directly impact the overall growth trajectory of the Open Source Software market.

This thoroughly compiled research output shares relevant details on overall industry production chain amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.Besides assessing details pertaining to production, distribution and sales value chain, this detailed research output on the Open Source Software market specifically highlights crucial developments across regions and vital countries, also lending a decisive understanding of the upcoming development scenario likely to be witnessed in the Open Source Software market in the near future.

This study covers following key players:IntelEpsonIBMTranscendOracleAcquiaOpenTextAlfrescoAstaroRethinkDBCanonicalClearCenterCleversafeCompiereContinuent

Request a sample of this report @ https://www.orbismarketreports.com/sample-request/80775?utm_source=Pooja

In this latest research publication on the Open Source Software market, a thorough overview of the current market scenario has been portrayed, in a bid to aid market participants, stakeholders, research analysts, industry veterans and the like to borrow insightful cues from this ready-to-use market research report, thus influencing a definitive business discretion.

The aim of the report is to equip relevant players in deciphering essential cues about the various real-time market based developments, also drawing significant references from historical data, to eventually present a highly effective market forecast and prediction, favoring sustainable stance and impeccable revenue flow despite challenges such as sudden pandemic, interrupted production and disrupted sales channel in the Open Source Software market.

Access Complete Report @ https://www.orbismarketreports.com/global-open-source-software-market-growth-analysis-by-trends-and-forecast-2019-2025?utm_source=Pooja

Market segment by Type, the product can be split into SharewareBundled SoftwareBSD(Berkeley Source Distribution)

Market segment by Application, split into BMForumphpBBPHPWind

The report is targeted to offer report readers with essential data favoring a seamless interpretation of the Open Source Software market.Therefore, to enable and influence a flawless market specific business decision, aligning with the best industry practices, this specificresearch report on the Open Source Software market also lends a systematic rundown on vital growth triggering elements comprising market opportunities, persistent market obstacles and challenges, also featuring a comprehensive outlook of various drivers and threats that eventually influence the growth trajectory in the Open Source Software market.

Some Major TOC Points:1 Report Overview2 Global Growth Trends3 Market Share by Key Players4 Breakdown Data by Type and ApplicationContinued

The report also incorporates ample understanding on numerous analytical practices such as SWOT and PESTEL analysis to source optimum profit resources in Open Source Software market.

Besides presenting a discerning overview of the historical and current market specific developments, inclined to aid a future-ready business decision, this well compiled research report on the Open Source Software market also presents vital details on various industry best practices comprising SWOT and PESTEL analysis to adequately locate and maneuver profit scope.The report in its subsequent sections also portrays a detailed overview of competition spectrum, profiling leading players and their mindful business decisions, influencing growth in the Open Source Software market.

For Enquiry before buying report @ https://www.orbismarketreports.com/enquiry-before-buying/80775?utm_source=Pooja

About Us : With unfailing market gauging skills, has been excelling in curating tailored business intelligence data across industry verticals. Constantly thriving to expand our skill development, our strength lies in dedicated intellectuals with dynamic problem solving intent, ever willing to mold boundaries to scale heights in market interpretation.

Contact Us : Hector CostelloSenior Manager Client Engagements4144N Central Expressway,Suite 600, Dallas,Texas 75204, U.S.A.Phone No.: USA: +1 (972)-362-8199 | IND: +91 895 659 5155

More here:
Global Open Source Software Market Projected to Reach USD XX.XX billion by 2025- Intel, Epson, IBM, Transcend, Oracle, Acquia, etc. - Market Research...

OSI (Open Source Initiative) is hosting a new 24-hour, virtual conference called State of the Source Summit, September 9-10. The non-profit organization plays an important role in the open source ecosystem as stewards of theOpen Source Definition (OSD).OSI is responsible for reviewing and approving licenses as OSD-conformant, which indirectly helps mediate community conflicts.

As part of the organizations overall mission to educate the public on the economic and strategic advantages of open source technologies and licenses, OSI is hosting a global summit to facilitate conversations on the current state of open source software.

We are so very excited to host our first-ever conference, with a global approach, OSI Board President Josh Simmons said. State of the Source provides an opportunity for both the open source software community and the OSIall those who have contributed so muchto reflect on how we got here, why we have succeeded, and what needs to happen now.

The conference will run four tracks with sessions that fall under these general groupings:

OSI has identified several example topics for each track, to guide potential presenters in writing a proposal. The first track encompasses more OSI-specific topics, such as license proliferation and license enforcement.

Projects & People includes topics that apply more broadly to communities and organizations open source business models, sustainability, patents, and trademarks. The Principles, Policy, and Practices track is geared towards application and example topics include things like explaining a license to your peers, learning how to select a license for your project, and compliance, compatibility, and re-licensing.

As more conferences are forced to move to a virtual format, the wider open source community has the opportunity to be more engaged in an event like State of the Source. Its a good venue for addressing non-technical issues related to the challenges facing open source maintainers and the community. The call for proposals ends July 16, and speakers will be announced August 25.

Like Loading...

Read more from the original source:
Open Source Initiative to Host Virtual State of the Source Summit, September 9-10 - WP Tavern

The year 2020 will be remembered on Wall Street as the Summer of Software. Because software can be made from home, delivers productivity, and scales in the age of the cloud, every software company looks like gold. Even Oracle (NASDAQ:ORCL) and ORCL stock.

Source: JHVEPhoto / Shutterstock.com

The insanity of the current market is shown by this. Oracle, a slow-growth company with a paltry dividend and only middling prospects, continues to grind higher. Its up 8% so far in 2020.

At $57 per share, a market cap of $173.4 billion, it trades at 18.4 times earnings. The 24 cent per share dividend yields 1.69%.

Oracle today claims to be a cloud platform with data centers on nearly every continent. But its footprint is small compared to Cloud Czars like Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), and Alphabets (NASDAQ:GOOGL, NASDAQ:GOOG) Google Cloud.

A decade ago, Oracle and Microsoft were very similar and roughly the same size. Then Microsoft began making its peace with open source, while Oracle went to war. Today Microsofts market cap of $1.61 trillion is nine times bigger than Oracles, its revenue four times bigger.

Not only did Oracle miss the bus on cloud early in the last decade, it actively resisted the trend. It bought Sun Microsystems for its open source software, then fought to make that software closed source. It won a long legal fight with Google, but open source responded by putting projects inside foundations Oracle couldnt buy. It maintained a proprietary model that squeezed customers for profits long after that stopped making sense.

Now Oracle is fighting to defend its remaining turf and its on the back foot. Oracle dominated the era of on-premise databases, servers installed at a companys offices. The growth is in cloud databases. Oracle insists it can win there, against companies founded by ex-Oracle employees like Salesforce.com (NYSE:CRM).

But founder Larry Ellison, now the fifth-richest person in the world, is selling his shares as fast as he can give them to himself. The share price is maintained by buybacks that are no longer fashionable. Oracle insists it can regain market share, but analysts no longer believe it.

A database is a very complicated thing. The larger it grows, the harder it is to make changes. Oracle has taken advantage of that. Its strength is with governments and large enterprises, who find it easier to keep paying Oracles prices than tear out what they have and re-build it.

Oracle grows its bottom line by squeezing these customers, holding down expenses, and with those buybacks. ORCL stocks share count has fallen by one-quarter over the last four years.

For investors in ORCL stock, this delivers slow and steady growth. The value of Oracle marches ahead by 10% per year. The dividend has risen 60% over the last five years, from 15 cents to 24 cents per quarter.

Analysts usually compare it with SAP (NYSE:SAP), the European database company, which makes it look good. But its real competition today is from nimbler, cloud-based companies like Workday (NASDAQ:WDAY), where the comparisons arent as good.

Oracle is a General Motors (NYSE:GM) Cadillac in a sea of Teslas (NASDAQ:TSLA).

I have spent most of my working life as a reporter, covering the business of technology. Ever since I joined InvestorPlace I have been warning readers away from ORCL stock.

You may think that, since my last warning about Oracle was on March 6 and its up almost 20% since then, I dont know what Im talking about. You can make a little money with Oracle. Its a safe holding, a favorite among conservative institutions.

But Oracle missed the boat on cloud, it missed the trend in open source, and its gains during this summer of software are small. Thats also the best it can do.

Dana Blankenhorn has been a financial and technology journalist since 1978. His latest book is Technologys Big Bang: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow with Moores Law, essays on technology available at the Amazon Kindle store. Write him at danablankenhorn@gmail.com or follow him on Twitter at @danablankenhorn. As of this writing he owned shares in MSFT and AMZN.

Go here to read the rest:
In the Summer of Software Even Oracle Is Winning - InvestorPlace

Overview

Open source tools have revolutionised the software testing profession. Any tester working on web/mobile apps has at least researched if not tried and adopted Selenium, Appium, or a tool that builds upon them. And any testing tool vendor recognises that it must address (and try to surpass) the value of these free and esteemed tools in order to gain any traction in todays highly competitive market. But, exactly how open source tools are impacting testing is not as clear. In this article, Wolfgang Platz, founder and chief strategy officer of Tricentis, explores the findings of his companys research into the state of open source testing

Exploring the state of open source software testing

Wolfgang Platz, founder and chief strategy officer,Tricentis

Open source tools have revolutionised the software testing profession. Any tester working on web or mobile apps has at least researchedif not tried and adoptedSelenium, Appium, or a tool that builds upon them. And any testing tool vendorrecognisesthat it must address and try to surpass the value of these free and esteemed tools in order to gain any traction in todays highly competitive market. But, exactly how open source tools are impacting testing is not as clear. Open source testing tools are used by a lot of different roles, in a lot of different regions, for a lot of different purposes.

The recently publishedState of Open Source Testing report a collaboration betweenTricentis,TestProject,SpecFlow, andFlood was designed to capture a global snapshot of where the software testing industry stands today and track how open source testing trends will evolve in the years to come. The biggest survey of its kind this year, it explores whether there are any universal advantages or challenges to opting for open source testing rather than commercial offerings, and the nuances that surface when you take a more targeted look at open source testing across functional testing versus load testing and BDD. And, while some of the surveys findings emphasised the expected, there were also some surprising statistics that change the general understanding of open source tool adoption in testing, and even the software testing discipline in general.

Skills and support

Unsurprisingly, the need for technical skills and a lack of product support were cited as the top challenges regarding the adoption of open source testing, accounting for almost 45 percent of the total votes. This corresponds with what weve seen in the field, in that open source tool adoption requires both skilled resources and a strong commitment to making it work. Indeed, those who expect it will be simple to deploy and scale open source testing frameworks will typically be disappointed. While open source test automation offers strong support for web and mobile technologies, it isnt easy to achieve end-to-end process coverage when numerous integration needs must be resolved, as in the case of complex enterprise apps, for example.

Given this need for technical skills, it would be reasonable to expect SDETs (Software Development Engineers in Test) and even developers to be the dominant users of open source testing tools. This doesnt appear to be the case, however. In fact, only eight percent of respondents were developers. With functional testing carried out by a distinct QA function 84 percent of the time, its perhaps not surprising that testing still isnt a focus area for developers. That said, despite a prediction by many people that agile development and DevOps would spell the end of testing, its erosion as a discipline simply doesnt appear to be happening.

Cost pressures

Time was cited as the number one impediment to functional testing in general. The primary motivator for selecting open source tools, however, was cost, along with the promised flexibility that having code fully under your control can lend to integration and customisation. Of course, cost pressure on testers has been exacerbated recently by the COVID-19 crisis, with a considerable spike in demand for the free community solution, TestProject, highlighting the extent to which it has become an important consideration when it comes to tool usage.

Its little surprise, therefore, that having selected an open source testing tool, and invested in customising it and integrating it into to their process, testers will become heavily reliant on it 92 percent of respondents said they considered the tool theyd selected as either important or very important. Most use their open source tool as part of a Continuous Testing process, with 75 percent running their functional test automation frequently or as part of the CI/CT/CD toolchain.

BDD

In general, most respondents said they found it useful to specify application behaviour using examples in varying forms, such as specification by example. The report shows that Given-When-Then (GWT), while not yet the sole standard, is becoming increasingly popular. Cucumber and SpecFlow were revealed to be the dominant players in the BDD tool area, accounting for 94 percent of responses between them. And the choice of tools was found to be highly correlated to the programming language used, with Java shops choosing Cucumber, and .NET users opting for SpecFlow.

Encouragingly, while many respondents were just at the beginning of their BDD journey, with 79 percent claiming to be no more than proficient, half of them (49%) are already experiencing significant increases in development efficiency. Despite this, though, scaling BDD is still a huge issue when you get into the region of thousands of tests, maintenance can become tricky. More needs to be done, therefore, to enable BDD at enterprise scale.

Load & performance testing

Surprisingly, the survey also found that QA and testers cover the biggest portion (47%) of load testing, with very few respondents reporting that load and performance testing was conducted by dedicated performance engineers. Whats more, although more than half of (56%) of respondents run test loads frequently, it doesnt form part of the CI/CT/CD toolchain. In other words, continuous load testing isnt yet a reality. Finally, many of the responses to the question of the greatest challenge with open source load testing touched upon the interpretation of results, an issue its hoped that, over time, will be improved through the application of AI.

These findings are just the tip of the iceberg, of course. Theres no doubt that open source testing tools have revolutionised the way testing is performed. Through community collaboration and transparency, tools are developed at a rapid pace with consistent alignment to customer requirements. Furthermore, the major projects such as Selenium and Appium have become a sort of global standard, allowing for interoperability of best of breed tools, free or commercial. And as their development and subsequent adoption progress, so new benefits and challenges will continue to arise. Next years report could make for very different reading.

More:
Exploring the state of open source software testing - Software Testing News

Open Source Software Industry Overview Competitive Analysis, Regional and Global Analysis, Segment Analysis, Market Forecasts 2026

The globalOpen Source Software marketshave undergone huge change in the last few months. These changes were due to the outbreak of the pandemic which was first detected in the Wuhan city of China. COVID-19 which has occurred due to the coronavirus has taken many lives of people around the world. As the disease is spreading at a rapid rate many of the countries have ordered lockdown for maintaining social distancing. Due to the lockdown, many of the industries have halted their manufacturing units. There have been restrictions for cross border trading within the countries and also within the states. Owing to these conditions, trading conditions in various regions have been affected badly. The overall countries in the world are facing economic crisis thus affecting some of the major markets in the world.

Request Free Sample Copy of Open Source Software Market Research Report@http://www.marketresearchstore.com/report/global-open-source-software-market-report-2018-industry-269351#RequestSample

The research analysts from theMarket Research Storehave conducted a detailed study about the global Open Source Software market. Owing to the above mentioned conditions, the global Open Source Software market has undergone several changes on the global platform. All these updates are mentioned in the Open Source Software market report study. The research analysts have conducted a thorough primary and secondary research for updating the market statistics as per the current market scenario. The detailed Open Source Software market report is of over 150 pages including more than 30 tables and around 20 figures. The report includes pictorial representations of the market data in order to understand the Open Source Software market in a simple and easy way.

The data that is included about the Open Source Software market incorporates historical data from 2016 to 2019 and forecasts data from 2020 to 2026. The major players that are functioning in the Open Source Software market areTranscend, Alfresco Software Inc, Continuent Inc., ClearCenter, Canonical, Cleversafe, Oracle, Actuate, Astaro Corp, Acquia, Compiere Inc., IBM, Intel, Epson, RethinkDB. Details about all the market players, distributors, suppliers, and retailers are profiled in the Open Source Software market report.

Read Detailed Index of full Research Study at::http://www.marketresearchstore.com/report/global-open-source-software-market-report-2018-industry-269351

The Open Source Software market is segmented into{Shareware, Bundled Software, BSD(Berkeley Source Distribution), Other}; {Phpbb, BMForum, Phpwind, Other}. Each of the market segments is described in detail within the report. Data about the segments are represented in both qualitative and quantitative format, thus enabling to understand the market in detail.

Major Advantages for Open Source Software Market:

Well-organized description of the international Open Source Software market along with the ongoing inclinations and future considerations to reveal the upcoming investment areas. The all-inclusive market feasibility is examined to figure out the profit-making trends to obtain the most powerful foothold in the Open Source Software industry. The Open Source Software market report covers data which reveal major drivers, constraints, and openings with extensive impact analysis. The current market is quantitatively reviewed from 2019 to 2028 to pinpoint the monetary competency of the global Open Source Software market. Last but not least, PORTERS Five Forces Analysis shows the effectiveness of the customers and providers from a global perspective.

If Any Inquiry of Open Source Software Report:http://www.marketresearchstore.com/report/global-open-source-software-market-report-2018-industry-269351#InquiryForBuying

Originally posted here:
Global Open Source Software Market with COVID-19 After Effects Analysis by Top Key Players Transcend, Alfresco Software Inc, Continuent Inc.,...

The phrase corporate change management frequently conjures images of CEOs, executives and leadership teams spearheading responses to market fluctuations, industry shifts, technological disruption and unknown forces like the current coronavirus pandemic. Todays turbulent times require a fresh approach. Modifications to processes organisation-wide can help teams prepare and respond to changing environments, while strengthening an organisations position and ability to withstand challenges.

When any of the events above happen, companies can find themselves with reduced or reorganised resources. When resources are limited, automating processes that were previously done manually can become top priority. As companies take cost cutting measuresreducing staff, streamlining teams, tightening their belts on resourcesit becomes a good time to strengthen infrastructure, technology and back office systems and processes.

One area where this is particularly relevant is in the management of open source software (OSS), including management of the license compliance and security issues that come with its use. Developers leverage OSS in their proprietary applications to speed up time to market and drive innovation; applications often include up to 80 per cent+ of OSS. However, the OSS knowledge gap continues to increase, with an OSS usage disclosure rate of only 6 per cent of what is actually found in audits. This usage can lead to more security vulnerabilities, exploits and breaches, driving an emphasis on regulations from multiple industry groups. Now is not the time to reduce open source usage or disregard open source risk.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) is the process of identifying and recording the use of all open source software components in your codebase. Open source software can enter your codebase in many forms including software packages, containers, build dependencies, complete source code files, copy/paste fragments of source code files, binaries, images, documents and multimedia files. SCA helps manage IP risks due to non-compliance with legal obligations, security risks due to vulnerable OSS components and reputation risks. Ignoring or deprioritising SCA due to resource constraints might seem prudent in the short-term, but can lead to incompleteness and inaccuracies in your Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), leading to an increase in the aforementioned risks over time.

The need to respond to corporate changes presents an opportunity to invest in engineering process improvements and technical debt burndown, while mitigating the risk that comes with reliance on OSS components. Limited engineering cycles mean that wasting time on remediation isnt wise; anything that can help catch issues early and often becomes a critical task to allow engineering to continue to focus on innovation. Integrating SCA into the DevOps process can help companies gear up for higher customer demand when the economy improves and the pace of engineering further increases. Managing open source risk in a changing environment is all about governance and automation, in tandem.

Governanceincluding oversight and controlof an open source software usage program is more important than ever to protect against malicious attacks in times of disruption or great change. In order to implement any governance program, understanding whats in your software is essential. A SBOM, created through the SCA process, becomes imperative for any effective governance program. The SBOM provides transparency into the makeup of your software applications and records the sub-components and dependencies, along with associated licenses and security vulnerabilities comprising your applications. The SBOM can help inform your approach to open source policy and help you react to vulnerabilities. Due to the level of complexity in todays software applications, without a complete and accurate SBOM, achieving and governing a complete, secure open source ecosystem is impossible.

There is no time like the present to establish an open source governance program and integrate it into the development toolchain in order to comply with open source licenses, manage obligations and maintain up-to-date knowledge of relevant security vulnerabilities impacting your application. Rather than performing ad-hoc scans or implementing scanning toward the end of your application development cycle, start earlier in the DevOps lifecycle, with an automated and cost-effective process. This expand-left approach helps manage compliance and security risks early and often, while protecting your intellectual property (IP). On the other hand, an incomplete, delayed or ignored SCA process may lead to costly litigation or last-minute remediation work.

Moving this scanning earlier in the lifecycleand scanning oftencan help streamline the efforts required to meet regulatory standards. For example, SBOMs are essential to meet PCI (payment account data) standards for secure software; the EUs General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements for security of processing; the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) updated cybersecurity recommendations; and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) guidelines for software component transparency. All of these initiatives share the following common requirements to:

The good news is that all of these requirements can be satisfied with continuous SCA. In a nutshell, continuous SCA is an evolution from ad-hoc audits to a manage by exception process. It includes the following key initiatives:

As staff contracts and internal audit teams are often scaled back during times of turbulence and extreme corporate changes, remaining staff gets burdened with more work. That skeleton crew must prioritise efficiency and productivity in order to get through the workload.

Automation in SCA makes up for lost and often forgotten manual efforts. An automated, standardised and repeatable process can help manage open source license inventory with increased accuracy, even at a time when staffing constraints are particularly tight. However, like all complex processes that require human interpretation, some manual processes will always remain. It is therefore important to factor those into your process and help set the right expectation with your stakeholders.

An automated SCA lifecycle includes:

Automation makes open source management an intrinsic part of an engineering process. First and foremost for staff, it means that no one has to push a button or otherwise remember to start an inventory management process at a particular time. Automated alerts inform users of critical changes to their SBOM items, including IP compliance issues and new security vulnerabilities. Tasks are automatically created and assigned to the appropriate users to track remediation work for non-compliant items.

Data currency is also strengthened through automation. Manual methods, including audits, provide snapshots of a codebase at a particular point in time. While useful, these snapshots become outdated quickly and can result in compliance issues being identified too late into the software development life cycle. Furthermore, the volume of data in a snapshot model is overwhelming, whereas an automated, continuous use approach is more manageable. Since your codebase and the resulting SBOM arent static, integrating code scanning into the DevOps environment is a way to ensure that risks are caught and remediated early and often. The cost to remediate a security issue in a released application can be up to 150x that of an issue being identified early in the development process.

Nothing is static. Code isnt static and neither are the processes related to ensuring its security. The only constant is change. Because risk compounds over time, addressing risk early and implementing an effective program for ongoing monitoring of that risk is critical. Ignoring license compliance or deferring security risk management can be more costly in the long run than actualising an open source governance program from the start.

Alex Rybak, Director of Product Management, Revenera

Read this article:
Manage open source risk in turbulent times through governance & automation - ITProPortal

Earlier this week the OpenPOWER Foundation announced the contribution of IBMs A21 Power processor core design to the open source community. Roughly this time last year, IBM announced open sourcing its Power instruction set (ISA) and Open Coherent Accelerator Processor Interface (OpenCAPI) and Open Memory Interface (OMI). Thats also when IBM said OpenPOWER would become a Linux Foundation entity. Then a few weeks ago, OpenPOWER named a new executive director, James Kulina.

Change is afoot at the OpenPOWER Foundation. Will it be enough to prompt wider (re)consideration and adoption of the OpenPOWER platform and ecosystem?

The big gun here historically has been IBM, which with Google, Tyan, Nvidia, and Mellanox, founded the OpenPOWER Foundation in 2013. It was meant to challenge Intels processor dominance in servers and HPC and to offer an alternative. Not surprisingly, creating a new ecosystem turns out to be hard. For one thing, IBM was the lone Power chip provider sometimes making OpenPOWER seem like just another IBM venture. Thats probably unfair and certainly understates the formidable capabilities of IBMs Power microprocessor (think Summit supercomputer) and the technical strengths of OpenCAPI and OMI (Open Memory Interface).

One has to admire IBMs pluck in dumping virtually all of its x86-based systems businesses for a big bet on IBM Power microprocessors and OpenPOWER generally.

That was then. This is now. For many reasons lets just lump them together as insufficient market traction IBM now looks to be deemphasizing its bet on OpenPOWER and passing the torch or at least a big chunk of the torch to others. A strong piece of evidence is that a successor to the Power9 processor (Power10) seems long overdue. Indeed, Kulina has written in a blog introducing himself, Its my goal to make OpenPOWER one of the easiest platforms to go from an idea to a silicon chip.

That means getting more Power chips from more silicon providers as has sometimes been discussed if not aggressively pursued in the past. The sudden emergence of processor diversity (AMD, ARM, RISC-V) and slight loosening of Intels grip on the market suggests the window for alternatives is open. Performance and price will be critical.

The question is: Can what often seemed like an IBM-plus-a-few-friends club transform into a thriving ecosystem that captures meaningful pieces of the HPC, mainstream server, cloud, edge, and perhaps other market segments. OpenPOWER currently reports it has 350-plus members, 150 OpenPOWER-ready certified products and 40 OpenPOWER systems shipping or in development. Kulina has high hopes for expansion and recently discussed his plans for growth with HPCwire. Presented here are a few of his comments.

HPCwire: OpenPOWER generally been seen as IBM centric and mostly a way to push its chips and systems. Is that wrong?

James Kulina: I actually would agree with you that historically the connotation has been this is an IBM pet project. If you talk to IBM, they dont want that. I think the announcement last year actually sets us up for that the next chapter where we can actually go and be this fully independent entity, where we can build out an ecosystem, both hardware, silicon hardware, systems and software. Being under the Linux Foundation gives us access to the latest and greatest open source software technologies and knowledge of how to actually build out really sustainable ecosystems.

So thats kind of where I come from anyway. We want to be viewed as an independent entity. We want people to come to the OpenPOWER Foundation to adopt the technology, the Power ISA, and all the other peripheral technologies that can spin out of that. We dont want it viewed as, were coming to IBM first and OpenPOWER is just this thing that sits off the side. Thats not how its going to be moving forward.

Were actually going to be proactive in our approach towards building out an ecosystem. To get to the idea that I framed around silicon, thats part of it, right. We need to have more people actually building chips. I think before a lot of companies were just waiting to see what IBM would do with its silicon with the power architecture. But now, including geopolitical [forces] and whatnot, you see a lot of lot of interest in having a fully open source, architecture and ISA to adopt and actually develop [their] own domestic chips. [For example], a lot of companies out of China and other areas are already asking about power, and Im very interested in it. [That] will lead to really good things because anybody can get involved in taking the Power ISA and customize as long as they stay within compliance.

HPCwire: That seems like a lot to tackle. What makes you think OpenPOWER can pull off a successful restart that avoids past missteps?

James Kulina: Ive been following OpenPOWER for a while now, actually, since it started. Im very interested in hardware in general and early in my career I did hardware design. I always wanted to get back into it and have always thought the success of open source software could now lead to [success in] open source hardware. The software folks have [built] roadmaps. It is different because hardware is different. The cost structure is different how you sell and buy and all that stuff but theres a lot of learnings that we can we can utilize in terms of talking to actual silicon vendors.

Ive had preliminary talks about who we might want to go after, and what we might want to want to do with them. But its really going to be around showing the value first of the architecture showing the use cases that it can benefit from Power. As well as I think software is a very key component in making sure that people dont have any reservations about adopting a new, a new platform. So our goal, my view is our goal as a foundation is to de-risk as much as possible, to think three to four steps ahead, and to try to take out those any of those barriers that might be preventing people from adopting the technology.

HPCwire. What do you see as the advantages the Power ISA set brings to the market. What distinguishes it from existing architectures, particularly given we seem be entering an emerging era of processor diversity with many aspirants?

James Kulina: The first [advantage] is that it is a mature technology. Its not still being ratified, like RISC-V. Now RISC-V is a great project and were happy to be involved with them, but its still nascent. The Power architecture is, you know, running the two fastest supercomputers in the world already. It has a proven software ecosystem, although I still think that that can be drastically enhanced in terms of what type of software is running. We need to cozy up more towards the things that a lot of your average developers would be interested in, not just HPC developers. Theres a lot of room for growth there and a lot of interest.

So OpenPOWER is a mature ecosystem. Its the fact that we have the OpenCAPI initiative. Hopefully that will be merging with the other 410 or however many other [standards efforts] that are basically doing the same thing CXL (Compute Express Link) and all that. Its things that we have that are already fairly mature and production grade and enterprise grade, and fully open source. One great thing we have is that you are patent-protected under the structure we have. That makes it a lot easier to for people to actually adopt and consume [OpenPOWER] technology and to add extensions.

HPCwire: Can you give us a few examples of specific use case areas that you that you think Power is well suited for?

James Kulina: The early the low hanging fruit still is HPC and enterprise but there are others we want to understand better. Im still coming up to speed on them where do we actually stand in other use cases and other segments, such as telecommunications, such as networking, such as edge computing, AI, and, and the like. This is where by being part of the Linux Foundation we get an inside track into all of those segments because theyre leaders in driving software thats running these [segments]. Were already starting conversations with top leaders and those projects to see how can we create a feedback loop between us so we know what we need to start building into our technology so that their members can actually adopt.

HPCwire: How about nearer term plans for the Power10 processor? Wed been expecting either more Power9 options or the Power10 introduction by now. Arm and AMD have been gaining momentum while the Power chip line seems stuck.

James Kulina: Im not really plugged into what IBM is doing there? Youd have to talk to IBM directly about that. I will say its going to be a fantastic ship. But you know, this is why we want multiple vendors for silicon. I think the Googles of the world, the hyper scalars of the world, wanted to see multiple vendors as well. And theres a lot of people in the middle, right, that want that kind of technology that dont have the resources and this is where I think we can have a groundswell of support around a fully open source platform.

HPCwire: It sounds like youre expecting the OpenPOWER platform to expand beyond HPC.

James Kulina: Were not abandoning HPC at all. Theres a lot of work that we can be doing in HPC. I honestly believe a lot of the technologies are happening in the cloud space are going to be pushing into the HPC space. Youre already seeing containers and Kubernetes being adopted in HPC. You know, theyre now adopting things that traditional HPC workload managers have been doing. Theres going to be a merging, I think, of these spaces. Thats actually a good thing because then you dont have silos and can have workloads being fully portable between HPC environments as well as cloud native environments.

So we want to make sure that were have irons in both fires there. But I definitely think theres a lot of momentum with RISC-V. Theres a lot of momentum for Arm and AMD and thats because theyre they have platforms that are readily accessible to the developer community. Thats always been a struggle for the OpenPOWER systems because its such an enterprise grade system. Its such a beast of a system and really can do a lot of great things but we need to have multiple silicon vendors so we can actually gain access to a wider swath of developers.

HPCwire: What sorts milestones are you setting for yourself for the next 6-12-18 months. What are you hoping to get done?

James Kulina: I think in the first couple months we need to think through organizational issues in terms of work groups. How do we architect our work groups? I want them to be more around use cases and segments and not just focused specifically on technologies. It makes it a lot easier for members if they can understand what is whats in it for them, and where they fit and how they can gain value.

The first thing is just getting organized in a way so that we can truly scale it. After that, its more about interfacing with silicon providers, IP houses, as well as fab houses. I think at every layer of the stack in the pipeline we want to see what we can do to make it easier to build new silicon as well as systems and getting the right people in the room to talk things through and have those feedback loops be as efficient as possible. My hope is that within a year or a year and a half, we actually have another silicon provider out there. And, you know, to give us some breathing room in terms of showcasing how an ecosystem can then grow even further from that.

HPCwire: Do you hope to include having silicon targeting broader segments?

James Kulina: Thats my goal. Whether its going to happen in a year or two years might be might be too early.

HPCwire: What do you think are the most pressing challenges?

James Kulina: The first thing is showcasing the use cases and the value proposition and getting organized into a state where we can scale. The next thing is more about access. So getting systems to people and getting to developers in particular, getting integrated with all the key open source groups and making sure that Power architecture is a first class citizen; its already a first class citizen in the kind of languages and the kind of software that people are actually caring about. Then its getting silicon providers on board and investigating power and then hopefully adopting power and producing new chips.

Theres also an education piece, a curriculum piece that we need to focus on as well. We have a fully open source platform, which is ready and its very useful in the academia world as well as in the commercial space, you can have people go from the nuts and the bolts all the way up through the sack and see how everything works. Were working with a number of universities to figure out how we can actually put together a curriculum. And how can we make that accessible not just for the students there, but also globally. Theres a lot of stuff that we can do in terms of, you know, events and meetups, and hackathons and all that.

HPCwire: Are there any specific synergies between Red Hat (IBM) and OpenPOWER?

James Kulina: Well, they (Red Hat] have an internal multi-architecture group and are already testing across the Power architecture. Theres a lot more we can be doing. It boils down, again, to getting access to Power systems. I think that a lot of Red Hatters dont have access to it. So this is one of the things now that Red Hats part of IBM that will help out.

HPCwire: Could share a little bit more about how you came into the position?

James Kulina: Ive been following open power for quite some time and I saw the announcement last year. In my previous role, I co-founded an open source cloud startup called hyper.Sh and we were acquired last year by Ant Financial, which was Alibaba. I was going through that transition and they eventually asked me to relocate to China. I said no for a number reasons and took a couple months off and saw that OpenPOWER had announced it fully open sourced the Power ISA. I reached out to Hugh [Blemings, former OpenPOWER executive director and now an OpenPOWER board advisor), who Ive known for a while through the open source ecosystem, and said, Do you need any help because this is, this is awesome; it is actually what needed to happen six years ago. Hugh said, actually, we do and it kind of kicked off from that.

Brief Bio of James KulinaJames is Executive Director of the OpenPower Foundation, with over 10 years of open source experience across hardware, software, and network engineering disciplines. James brings a passion for open source and is committed to growing OpenPower Foundations membership, community, and ecosystem.He is a serial entrepreneur with a background in enterprise technology and has worked inroles spanning operations, business development, product management, and engineering.

Previously, James was co-founder and COO at Hyper.sh, an open source cloud-native virtualization startup acquired by Ant Financial. Prior to that, he led product management in Red Hats OpenStack group, and was a product lead on AT&Ts first OpenStack Cloud.James graduated from University of Virginia with a degree in Electrical Engineering and is based in New York.

Link to article on the A21 core design just put into open source: https://www.hpcwire.com/off-the-wire/a2i-power-processor-core-contributed-to-openpower-community-to-advance-open-hardware-collaboration/

More:
OpenPOWER Reboot New Director, New Silicon Partners, Leveraging Linux Foundation Connections - HPCwire

DURHAM, N.C., June 30, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Open Invention Network (OIN), the largest patent non-aggression community in history, and Baidu, the largest Chinese language search engine and one of the leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies in the world, announced today that Baidu has joined as a community member. As an active supporter of open source and an important contributor of global open source technology, Baidu is committed to promoting the rapid development of AI through an open source platform and facilitating industrial transformation.

Artificial intelligence-driven and internet-based services continue to spawn new industries while advancing business performance through actionable intelligence. As a global leader in internet and AI-related services and products, Baidu recognizes the benefits of shared innovation inherent in open source, said Keith Bergelt, CEO of Open Invention Network. We are pleased Baidu has joined our community and committed to patent non-aggression in Linux and adjacent open source technologies.

Baidu is and will always be a strong supporter and participant of open source," said Cui Lingling, the head of Baidus Patent Department, Baidu has launched a number of open source platforms including Apollo (Autonomous Driving Platform), PaddlePaddle (Parallel DistributedDeep Learning) and the like, and has been actively building patent cooperation. Baidu is a world-leading artificial intelligence platform company. Baidus participation in the OIN community shows our consistent commitment to open source innovation. Baidu will continue to support Linux patent protection and help foster a healthy Linux ecosystem."

OINs community practices patent non-aggression in core Linux and adjacent open source technologies by cross-licensing Linux System patents to one another royalty-free. Similarly, OIN licenses its patents royalty-free to organizations that agree not to assert their patents against the Linux System. The OIN license can be signed online at http://www.j-oin.net/.

About BaiduFounded on January 1st, 2000, Baidu is a leading search engine, knowledge and information centered Internet platform and AI company. With over 1.1 billion monthly active devices running Baidu mobile apps, Baidu is the primary platform for Internet users to access Chinese information and responds to billions of search requests from more than 100 countries and regions daily.

Baidus story began when Co-Founder of the company, Robin Li, was awarded a U.S. patent for his initial development of the Rankdex site-scoring algorithm for search engine page rankings, making China one of only four countries in the world with core search engine technologies in addition to the U.S., Russia and South Korea. According to the Patent Protection Association of China, Baidu held 5,712 AI patents in 2019, the most in China.

Baidu keeps technological innovation at the heart of its business and has been a global leader in innovation investment, R&D and talent acquisition. With its mission to make the complicated world simpler through technology, Baidu is committed to providing products and services that better understand users and promotes constant technological innovation. Through years of investment and development and the companys global leadership in deep learning, Baidu rank fourth on the list of the top five global AI companies by Harvard Business Review in 2019 and is the only company on the list in China.

PaddlePaddle, as the only independent R&D deep learning platform in China, has been officially open-sourced to professional communities since 2016. DuerOS, as an open operating system, has released an open platform, and built a voice ecosystem, and also provided support for third party integration. Baidu Cloud primarily provides AI solutions, cloud infrastructure and other services to enterprises and individuals. Apollo, as the world's largest open-source autonomous driving platform, supports commercial production of autonomous driving vehicles and incorporates autonomous driving capabilities, including valet parking.

Under the strategy of strengthening the mobile foundation and leading in AI, Baidu has built an increasingly prosperous and powerful mobile ecosystem and steadily improved its AI ecosystem with accelerated commercialization.

About Open Invention NetworkOpen Invention Network (OIN) is the largest patent non-aggression community in history and supports freedom of action in Linux as a key element of open source software (OSS). Patent non-aggression in core technologies is a cultural norm within OSS, so that the litmus test for authentic behavior in the OSS community includes OIN membership. Funded by Google, IBM, NEC, Philips, Sony, SUSE and Toyota, OIN has more than 3,200 community members and owns more than 1,300 global patents and applications. The OIN patent license and member cross-licenses are available royalty-free to any party that joins the OIN community.

For more information, visit http://www.openinventionnetwork.com.

Media-Only Contact:

Ed SchauwekerAVID Public Relations for Open Invention Networked@avidpr.com+1 (703) 963-5238

Here is the original post:
Baidu Joins the Open Invention Network Community - GlobeNewswire