Chelsea Manning Breaks Silence To Criticise Obama’s Isis …

Chelsea Manning, the US army soldier who worked as an intelligence analyst in Iraq before being arrested for passing state secrets to WikiLeaks, says the only way to defeat Isis is to allow the group to set up its own contained failed state where over time its fire would die out on its own.

Writing in the Guardian, Manning says her experience as an all-source analyst near Baghdad in 2009-10 leads her to doubt the strategy being followed by the Obama administration. She warns that the US-led mission to destroy the extremist group is destined to fail because it will merely feed a cycle of outrage, recruitment, organizing and even more fighting that goes back decades.

Even with the support of non-western forces, attacking Isis directly from the air or with special forces on the ground risks mission creep and the repeat of past errors. I believe that Isis strategically feeds off the mistakes and vulnerabilities of the very democratic western states they decry, she writes.

Presenting a radical alternative blueprint for how to deal with the extremist group, Manning argues that the best way to degrade Isis is to allow it to set up a failed state within a clearly demarcated territory. There, Isis would gradually become unpopular and unable to govern, she predicts, and the ideology of its leadership would be discredited in the region, potentially forever.

Eventually, if they are properly contained, I believe that Isis will not be able to sustain itself on rapid growth alone, and will begin to fracture internally. The organization will begin to disintegrate into several smaller, uncoordinated entities ultimately failing in their objective of creating a strong state.

Manning was posted to Forward Operating Base Hummer outside Baghdad where as an intelligence analyst she had a ring-side seat on the largely Sunni insurgency, poring through classified databases to track the movements and tactics of groups including Isis. She was arrested in May 2010 and is now serving a 35-year sentence for leaking vast quantities of secret official documents and military videos to the open-information website WikiLeaks.

Manning wrote the Guardian article in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, where she is in military custody. An appeal against her sentence is expected to be heard by the US army court of criminal appeals next year.

As the global coalition of more than 30 countries takes shape around the search for a military response to Isis, Mannings proposals point in a strikingly different direction. Western countries, she says, should show sufficient discipline to let the barbarity and brutality of the groups attacks including recent beheadings of two Americans and a Briton work against them.

Instead of bombs and bullets, the US and its allies should seek to weaken the jihadi threat through a combination of containment and propaganda, she says. They should staunch the flow of money to the extremists by halting ransom payments for hostages and cutting off oil revenues from Bayji in Iraq.

She also says US and its allies should try to reduce the numbers of young people joining the Isis camp from western countries by countering the narrative put out by the group in its recruitment videos.

Read more:
Chelsea Manning Breaks Silence To Criticise Obama’s Isis ...

» Chelsea Manning on containing ISIS in Guardian op-ed …

If properly contained, Isis will not be able to sustain itself on rapid growth alone, and will begin to fracture internally. Photograph: via AP

The Islamic State (Isis) is without question a very brutal extremist group with origins in the insurgency of the United States occupation of Iraq. It has rapidly ascended to global attention by taking control of swaths of territory in western and northern Iraq,including Mosul and other major cities.

Based on my experience as an all-source analyst in Iraq during the organizations relative infancy, Isis cannot be defeated by bombs and bullets evenas the fight is taken to Syria, evenif it is conducted by non-Western forces with air support.

I believe that Isis is fueled precisely by the operational and tactical successes of European and American military force that would be and have been used to defeat them. I believe that Isis strategically feeds off the mistakes and vulnerabilities of the very democratic western states they decry. The Islamic States center of gravity is, in many ways, the United States, the United Kingdom and those aligned with them in the region.

When it comes to regional insurgency with global implications, Isis leaders are brilliant strategists. Its clear to me that they have a solid and complete understanding of the strengths and, more importantly, the weaknesses of the west. They know how we tick in America and Europe and they know what pushes us toward intervention and overreach. This understanding is particularly clear considering the Islamic States astonishing success in recruiting numbers of Americans, Britons, Belgians, Danes and other Europeans in their call to arms.

Attacking Isis directly, by air strikes or special operations forces, is a very tempting option available to policymakers, with immediate (but not always good) results. Unfortunately, when the west fights fire with fire, we feed into a cycle of outrage, recruitment, organizing and even more fighting that goes back decades. This is exactly what happened in Iraq during the height of a civil war in 2006 and 2007, and it can only be expected to occur again.

And avoiding direct action with Isis can be successful. For instance,in 2009 and 2010, Isis attacked civilians in suicide and car bombings in downtown Baghdad to try and provoke American intervention and sectarian unrest. But they were often not effective in their recruiting efforts when American and Iraqi forces refused (or were unable) to respond, because the barbarity and brutality of their attacks worked against them. When we did respond, however, the attacks were sold to the Sunni minority in Iraq as a justified response to an occupying government favoring the Shia government led by former prime minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Based on my intelligence work in Iraq during that period, I believe that only a very focused and consistent strategy of containment can be effective in reducing the growth and effectiveness of Isis as a threat. And so far, Western states seem to have adopted that strategy. With very public humanitarian disasters, however, like the ones onMount SinjarandIrbilin northern Iraq, and the beheadings of journalistsJames FoleyandSteven Sotloff, this discipline gets tested and can begin to fray.

As a strategy to disrupt the growth of Isis, I suggest focusing on four arenas:

Eventually, if they are properly contained, I believe that Isis will not be able to sustain itself on rapid growth alone, and will begin to fracture internally. The organization will begin to disintegrate into several smaller, uncoordinated entities ultimately failing in their objective of creating a strong state.

Visit link:
» Chelsea Manning on containing ISIS in Guardian op-ed ...

Katharine Gun’s Risky Truth-telling

Truth-telling can be a dangerous undertaking, especially when done by government insiders trying to expose wrongdoing connected to war-making, as British intelligence official Katharine Gun discovered in blowing the whistle on a pre-Iraq War ploy, writes Sam Husseini.

By Sam Husseini

I felt it was explosive, it really made me angry when I read it. I genuinely hoped that the information would strengthen the peoples voice. It could derail the entire process for war. So said Katharine Gun recently when asked about information she leaked shortly before the invasion of Iraq.

It wasnt self-serving hyperbole. Daniel Ellsberg, who himself leaked the Pentagon Papers, has calledKatharineGuns leak the most important and courageous leak I have ever seen. No one else including myself has ever done what Gun did: tell secret truths at personal risk, before an imminent war, in time, possibly, to avert it.

Former British intelligence officer Katharine Gun. (Photo credit: BBC)

And indeed, Ellsberg had asked for such a leak during this period. He had been saying during the run-up to the Iraq invasion: Dont wait until the bombs start falling. If you know the public is being lied to and you have documents to prove it, go to Congress and go to the press. Do what I wish I had done before the bombs started falling [in Vietnam] I think there is some chance that the truth could avert war.

Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers internal documents which showed a pattern of U.S. government deception about the Vietnam War in 1971, though he had the information earlier. And while the Pentagon Papers, the leaks by Chelsea Manning to WikiLeaks and Edward Snowdens National Security Agency leaks were all quite massive, theKatharineGun leak was just 300 words. Its power came from its timeliness.

In October of 2002, the U.S. Congress passed the so-called Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002. In November, the U.S. government had gotten the United Nations Security Council to pass a threatening resolution on Iraq, but in most peoples view, it stopped short of actually authorizing force.

The U.S. ambassador to the U.N. at the time, John Negroponte, said when resolution 1441 was adopted unanimously: Theres no automaticity and this is a two-stage process, and in that regard we have met the principal concerns that have been expressed for the resolution. That is, the U.S. would intend to come back for a second resolution if Iraq didnt abide by a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations.

On Feb. 5, 2003, Colin Powell claimed in his infamous presentation at the UN that Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destruction. Feb. 15, 2003 saw the greatest global protests in history, with millions around the world rallying against the impending Iraq invasion, including over a million near the UN headquarters in New York City.

Here is the original post:
Katharine Gun’s Risky Truth-telling

Prohibited activist Ciaron O’Reilly arrested in Brisbane

POLICE have arrested prohibited activist Ciaron O'Reilly for trying to enter the declared G20 security zone.

Mr O'Reilly told the police officers who swooped on him that he wanted to speak with US President Barack Obama about freeing Chelsea Manning.

The US soldier was imprisoned for releasing classified documents to WikiLeaks.

Mr O'Reilly was holding a "Free Julian Assange" placard when he approached the restricted area near Musgrave Park in South Brisbane.

He also read out the letter he received from Queensland Police Commissioner Ian Stewart banning him from G20 restricted areas.

Mr O'Reilly told police no one had explained to him why he was barred.

When he tried to go into the area he was arrested and taken into a paddy wagon.

As Mr O'Reilly got into the paddy wagon he called for the freedom of Ms Manning and Mr Assange, the WikiLeaks leader.

Excerpt from:
Prohibited activist Ciaron O’Reilly arrested in Brisbane

Banned protester held for G20 breach

A protester has been charged with possessing a prohibited item inside the G20 security zone.

A man who wore a Guy Fawkes mask during a G20 protest has been charged with carrying a prohibited item in the security area.

The 44-year-old was arrested on the corner of Tank St and North Quay about 1.45pm on Saturday.

He has been issued with an exclusion notice and will appear in court on December 4.

It's the second such charge issued on the first day of the summit.

Earlier two women were taken to police headquarters for reportedly carrying gas masks. One, a 25-year-old, was later charged with carrying an unspecified prohibited item.

Meanwhile, a video of a protester - once jailed in the US for helping disable a war plane - being arrested for ignoring his G20 ban for a second time has appeared on social media.

It shows Ciaron O'Reilly surrounded by police, yelling "Free Julian Assange, Free Chelsea Manning" (formerly Bradley Manning, the US Army soldier convicted for leaking classified documents) before entering a police van.

Police could not immediately confirm his arrest.

O'Reilly was issued with a G20 exclusion notice on November 9.

See original here:
Banned protester held for G20 breach

G20 protester charged over mask

A protester has been charged with possessing a prohibited item inside the G20 security zone.

A man who wore a Guy Fawkes mask during a G20 protest has been charged with carrying a prohibited item in the security area.

The 44-year-old was arrested on the corner of Tank St and North Quay about 1.45pm on Saturday.

He has been issued with an exclusion notice and will appear in court on December 4.

It's the second such charge issued on the first day of the summit.

Earlier two women were taken to police headquarters for reportedly carrying gas masks. One, a 25-year-old, was later charged with carrying an unspecified prohibited item.

Meanwhile, a video of a protester - once jailed in the US for helping disable a war plane - being arrested for ignoring his G20 ban for a second time has appeared on social media.

It shows Ciaron O'Reilly surrounded by police, yelling "Free Julian Assange, Free Chelsea Manning" (formerly Bradley Manning, the US Army soldier convicted for leaking classified documents) before entering a police van.

Police could not immediately confirm his arrest.

O'Reilly was issued with a G20 exclusion notice on November 9.

Continued here:
G20 protester charged over mask

Activist planned to confront Obama

Police arrest a G20 protester wearing an Anonymous mask. Photo: Scott Paterson

A notorious Brisbane activist arrested for breaking his ban on entering the G20 security zone has been remanded in custody.

Mitchelton man Ciaron O'Reilly, 54, was grabbed by police walking across Cordelia Street towards the Convention and Exhibition Centre about 3pm Saturday.

He had already been declared a prohibited person on Thursday.

Police were even present on the water. Photo: Robert Shakespeare

"My intentions from the beginning were to non-violently confront President Obama on the persecution of the Queenslander Julian Assange and also Chelsea Manning," Mr O'Reilly said before his arrest.

Advertisement

"They [police] say I'm a prohibited personI don't think any event is worth staging where you suspend our universal human rights."

Four other people were arrested during protests on Saturday.

Police form a wall on the streets on Saturday as G20 leaders meet in Brisbane.

Read the rest here:
Activist planned to confront Obama

Held activist planned to confront Obama

Police arrest a G20 protester wearing an Anonymous mask. Photo: Scott Paterson

A notorious Brisbane activist arrested for breaking his ban on entering the G20 security zone has been remanded in custody.

Mitchelton man Ciaron O'Reilly, 54, was grabbed by police walking across Cordelia Street towards the Convention and Exhibition Centre about 3pm Saturday.

He had already been declared a prohibited person on Thursday.

Police were even present on the water. Photo: Robert Shakespeare

"My intentions from the beginning were to non-violently confront President Obama on the persecution of the Queenslander Julian Assange and also Chelsea Manning," Mr O'Reilly said before his arrest.

Advertisement

"They [police] say I'm a prohibited personI don't think any event is worth staging where you suspend our universal human rights."

Four other people were arrested during protests on Saturday.

Police form a wall on the streets on Saturday as G20 leaders meet in Brisbane.

Read the rest here:
Held activist planned to confront Obama

Face to face: G20 activists’ messages for the world leaders meeting in Brisbane

Barack Obama & Ciaron O'Reilly

"I'm on the streets in this G20 for Assange, Manning, and Snowden. Society is not asked to mobilise, it's just asked to look the other way. That's what Chelsea Manning refused to do.

_Anti-war protester Ciaron O'Reilly, who is banned from the G20 security zone_

"If any individual who objects to government policy can take it in their own hands to publicly disclose classified information, then we will not be able to keep our people safe."

_US president Barack Obama_

"This tragedy would not have happened if there were peace on this land. And, certainly, the state over whose territory this occurred [Ukraine] bears responsibility for this awful tragedy."

_Russian president Vladimir Putin_

"After the MH17 disaster the world can see how [Mr Putin] treats people and how he has no regard for human life... for him to be here and smile and be nice it's a real slap in the face."

_Ukraine Community of Queensland president Stephen Chomyn_

"Torres Strait Islanders, on top of being very marginalised, are also having to face the very real impacts of climate change, and this is not an issue they can tackle alone."

Read the original:
Face to face: G20 activists' messages for the world leaders meeting in Brisbane

Review of “Night” | Chelsea Manning

In Night, Elie Weizel must endure certain aspects of the Holocaust, not only the constant threat of death but of the total dehumanization and decivilization of the Jewish people.

In the beginning, the incredulity, both of the Jews as well as of the rest of the world sets a trap for the Jews, thus enabling the German armies to kidnap the Jewish people from their homes and put them, almost willingly into cattle cars to be deported. Even with several warnings, coming from Moishe the Beadle as well as from Mara and from the friend of the Weizel family in the Hungarian police, the Weizels, along with all their fellow citizens, refuse to acknowledge the signs of danger. Elie states that to the last moment, people clung to hope (p. 15). He also tries to reason away the terrible rumours that Moishe brings, by reasoning that the war is almost over, that it is the middle of the twentieth century and surely no one would do such horrendous things. The people had so many warnings, there were so many signs, and yet, because they didnt want to believe what could happen to them, they pretended that their fears were unfounded.

The hope of the Jewish people as well as their connection to family prevented them from heeding the warnings. When Mara comes to them and begs them to come with her, naturally [they] refused to be separated (p. 20). It seems that the Germans knew what was the most effective way to herd the Jews together, what was the best way to keep them from running. The Jews would not be separated from their families and their homes until forced to, and they would not be separated from humanitarian ideas or the believe that evil could exist without protest. They try to silence Ms. Schacter, becoming more and more violent when she screams Jews, listen to meI see a fire! I see flames, huge flames! (p. 25) suggesting that they know what they are fated to, and yet, are not willing to admit it to themselves. There are so many warnings, so many subconscious doubts, and yet the Jews cannot make themselves admit their future, lest they go mad with fear.

While in the camp, though Elie notes ironically how he is constantly in danger of dying, he is much more preoccupied with the death of the spirit. If there is a way to utterly destroy a people, death may not be the ultimate solution. The dehumanization that Elie witnesses, the undermining of Jewish values seems to have been a far more effective solution for Hitler and the SS. As Elie basically came into the camp with no more than a father- son connection, it is this that he must hold on to for as long as he possibly can. But, like the gold crowns and the shoes and the belts, the concentration camp has a way of slowly taking that from Elie. Elies potential foil seems to be Rabbi Eliahus son, who is grateful (if unconsciously) to have his fathers weight taken from his shoulders. When Rabbi Eliahus son abandons his father during the march, Elie realizes what he the son is doing. For Elie, abandoning his father is the thing he fears the most. Later, when Elie is giving his soup to his father, he realizes that [his] heart was heavy. [He] was aware that [he] was doing it grudgingly. Just like Rabbi Eliahus son, [he] had not passed the test (p. 107). The Nazis were able to make so horrible a place, that only the most basic desires could be followed. To kill or begrudge a dying father a crust of bread in order to ease the hunger pains shows an utter undermining of the strong familial ties of the Jewish people.

Additionally, Elie finds his faith falter as he sees all the terror and suffering that God has allowed. Elie states that for the first time, I felt anger rising within me. Why should I sanctify His name? The Almighty, the eternal and terrible Master of the Universe, chose to be silent. What was there to thank Him for? (p. 33) Though the Jewish God is often portrayed as a God of terrible wrath, Elie finds it terrible to see how much their God might make them suffer. He notes the irony in the similarity between his people and the worst of Biblical sinners. He questions perhaps the sanity and the justness of that which he had worshipped his entire life when he asks, But look at these men whom You have betrayed, allowing them to be tortured, slaughtered, gassed, and burned, what do they do? They pray before You! They praise Your name! (p. 68) For Elie, the loss of faith in a benevolent God seems to make him stronger, albeit less Jewish. But for others, such as Meir Katz, the loss of faith completely destroys them. Elie watches as Meir Katz, the strong one, the sturdiest of us all, began to cryonly now did he fall apart. He could not go on. He had reached the end (p. 102). Though Elies father tells him to hold on, Meir can no longer do so because of the horrors he has seen, because of his loss of faith for people and perhaps, for God. By forcing Jews to lose their God, seemingly from their own weakness, the Nazis literally and figuratively are able to exterminate Jews. Those who cannot live with such disillusionment either die from the lack of will to go on, or, similar to Elie, turn their back on their God. Elie uses the hanging of the little pipel to state his idea on what has happened to God in his life. For Gods sake, where is God? And from within me, I heard a voice answer: Where He is? This is wherehanging from the gallows (p. 65) The Nazis use horror to kill the Jewish people as well as the Jewish faith.

Perhaps the Nazis are able to so utterly destroy these people because the camps are set up to create the mentality that these people who are their prisoners are not people. When Elies father asks for a toilet (p. 39), he is stared at, as though the guard wished to ascertain that the person addressing him was actually a creature of flesh and bone (p. 39). Additionally, the process of showering and disinfecting the Jews before entering each camp seems to be a way, not to keep the Jews clean and healthy, but rather to set a mentality that Jews are dirty things, like plagues. They are not human, nor are they sanitary enough for human contact. When Elies camp is taken by his guards, both the guards and the girls seem to treat the people as no more than a herd of sheep. They act as though the Jews are little more than animals, and do not seem to notice the ravaged faces of tortured people. The guards are not afraid to show their prisoners to these German citizens, nor do the girls pay attention to the apparent suffering of these people. The girls notice, but since they have been taught that Jews are evil and subservient, they do not protest against what is happening to these people.

Like Loading...

Read the rest here:
Review of “Night” | Chelsea Manning