These Wonks Study the Dangers of Artificial Intelligence. To Get You to Pay Attention, They Wrote a Thriller. – Washingtonian

Burn-In, the latest futuristic thriller from P. W. Singer and August Cole, is technically a novel, but dont call it science fiction: None of the technologyand there is a whole lot of technologyis made up. The characters and plot are invented, but the depiction of the DC of the future is based not on imagination but rather on extensive research. Set roughly 20 years from now, the book taps into existing tech, ideas under development, and current research, all meticulously footnoted throughout the text.

Singer, a strategist and senior fellow at New America, is an expert on defense issues, while Cole once covered the defense industry for the Wall Street Journal. (They previously teamed up for Ghost Fleet, a novel about what a war with China might look like.) Their defense credentials and intriguing approach have earned them a surprising collection of Burn-In blurbs, from David Petraeus to Lost co-creator Damon Lindelof to Garry Kasparov. We talked to Singer about how the book came about and what Washington could be like two decades from now.

A good example would be algorithmic bias. It sounds like this wonky, complex topic, but algorithmic bias is essentially when the AI spits out an outcome or takes an action that is biased in some way that it wasnt originally programmed to do. For example, weve seen AI used to screen who should get bank loans, and it was screening out African Americans. The AI was being racist even though no one had told it to be racist. This is an incredibly important concept, but most people are not going to read an academic paper on algorithmic bias. Instead, we illustrate it through scenes like, for example, when an FBI agent is trying to pick a terrorist out of a crowd at Union Station. Its an exciting scene, and yet at the end of it the reader walks away not just entertained but also understanding some of the concepts of algorithmic bias.

Theres a long tradition of people in policy and politics writing a novel as a side enterprise. Some of them are really great, and some of them are not so great. [Laughs] But this is different in that it is actually part of the plan. Its taking that research that youre doing in the policy world and deliberately sharing it through this mix of fiction and nonfiction. Early on, I think there was a little bit of eyebrow raising, but then after the impact of Ghost Fleet, it was inarguable. It wasnt just that people were seeing an influence on policyit opened up a broader discussion of using this [type of book] as a new kind of tool. We call it useful fiction, or the more technical term is FICINT. For people in the government, theyll recognize the terms of SIGINT, signals intelligence, or HUMINT, human intelligence, and these are the tools that spies and analysts use to explain and explore and analyze. What weve put forward is this concept of FICINT, and its taken off.

New America is a different kind of think tankwe very much have a focus on new ideas and lifting up new voices, and weve also made a strong push to explore how to communicate in new, more-effective ways. In a world thats moving at machine speed, where theres so much going on around us thats hard to understand, it can be incredibly useful to have a guide to take you through that world. That is what narrative isits actually the oldest technology of all. But its not just the complexityits simply how much is going on. Important ideas, important research, are competing for attention. To put it bluntly, people are more likely to read an engrossing novel than a think tank white paper or an article in the Journal of the Association of Obscure Studies. [Laughs]

Burn-In has already had policy impact. The Cyberspace Solarium Commission is a Congressionally mandated bipartisan commission to essentially redo all US cybersecurity strategy. When they developed a report on the changes that the US needed to make in its cybersecurity policy, the commissioners were worried that the report would experience the same fate as all those other lengthy commission reports that had been written on terrorism before 9/11 that werent listened to until they were too late. And so in lieu of a traditional beginning to the report, they actually commissioned a short story from us that was drawn from Burn-In. The beginning of the report is actually this story read from the perspective of a congressional staffer who is tasked with writing legislation in the wake of a massive series of cyber attacks that have crippled Washington, DC. So the idea was to drop the commissions target audience into both a public and personal nightmare experience with the idea of inducing them to ponder what they ought to do in order to avoid going through thisright before they then read a series of policy solutions.

Steve Mnuchin said AI is not something that we have to care about for 50 to 100 years. Im sorry, its here now and it will be an issue that we all have to wrestle with. In many ways, were going through an industrial revolution like what happened with the rise of steam engines. But it goes beyond it, because in this case its a tool that is intelligent and that means there is a series of new questions that we all have to wrestle with. Essentially, we need to understand it and we need to prepare for it. Preparing for it is everything from how we make changes in our education system to changes in our law and policy.

Whats notable to me is how it cuts across so many different areas. Take the idea of face recognition. Its an issue for the DC police and federal government and US military but its also an issue for pretty much every business. Kentucky Fried Chicken is talking about applying face recognition! Okay, so what does that mean? What aspects of it are we okay with and what aspects are we not okay with? So I hope the book, by giving people an ability to visualize this future world, equips them better to navigate it as it all becomes real.

One thing I should add is how the pandemic has accelerated everything that was in play. All of the issues of Burn-In were in motion before the pandemic. But all the data shows that theyve been drastically accelerated by it. Our opening scene has a futuristic delivery robot driving down the sidewalk, and that very system has been deployed to deliver groceries in [parts of DC]. Or one of the characters is doing remote work, but at a cost to his marriagesomething a lot of people are dealing with. Much of the population has been thrown into remote learning and remote work to a level that was never anticipated. In other sectors weve been moved forward in a matter of weeks to where we didnt think wed be for ten years. Telemedicine is a good example of that. And were now putting into place plans for AI tracking of society at whole new levels. When we get through the pandemic, one thing that is easy to predict is that were not going 100 percent back. And so that means also that all the tough social, policy, legal, moral, security, and even family issues that our characters experience, theyre also going to come faster in the real world.

Technology is a tool, and every tool has been used for both and good and ill. The very first stone that was picked up was either used to smash up some food or bash someone in the head. Today, drones have been used for war and theyre also being used by human rights organizations to detect and stop war crimes. In Burn-In we play with that duality of these technologies coming. The Washington, DC, of the future will be a smarter cityyoull have smart homes, smart transportation, the internet of things weaving through buildings that range from government headquarters to restaurants and retail. Its going to create a level of convenience and money-saving and energy-saving that is very much out of the most utopian views of science fiction. Its going to be incredible in so many different ways. But, oh, by the way, it will also introduce new vulnerabilities that bad guys might take advantage of to carry out new kinds of crimes. So that duality is always there. Its up to us to determine which path wins out.

Join the conversation!

Politics and Culture Editor

A DC native, Rob Brunner moved back to the city in 2017 to join Washingtonian. Previously, he was an editor and writer at Fast Company and other publications. He has also written for the New York Times Magazine, New York, and Rolling Stone, among others. He lives with his family in Chevy Chase DC.

Read the original here:
These Wonks Study the Dangers of Artificial Intelligence. To Get You to Pay Attention, They Wrote a Thriller. - Washingtonian