What’s happening to arts censorship in the age of cancel culture? – ArtsHub

In free democracies like Australia we assume artists can express what they want in their work without fear of persecution.

Unlike in some countries where they could be imprisoned for art that challenges political or moral standards, democracies are usually far more supportive of artists free speech.

Though in recent years, some artists have detected complex new pressures that are threatening to curtail what they feel they can say in their work.

ArtsHub spoke to one established artist who described how it feels like you have to be more careful now, when dealing with morally challenging subjects, and that they would think twice about doing that kind of [extreme] work now.

This feeling of having to think twice before presenting risky ideas in art is a trend seen both at home and overseas.

At this years Documenta art exhibition in Germany, for example, a work by one of its invited artist-collaboratives had to be covered up after public accusations that it included an anti-Semitic reference. The large outdoor banner work entitled Peoples Justice by Indonesian art group Taring Padi included a cartoon-like figure many interpreted as a derogatory portrayal of a Jewish person.

In defending the work, the creators explained that the piece (which interestingly, was first exhibited at the Art Gallery of South Australia in 2002 without issue) was intended to depict part of a campaign against militarism and the violence [they] experienced during Suhartos 32-year military dictatorship, and that it was in no way related to antisemitism.

Yet public outrage persisted to the point that less than a month after the furore, Documentas Director Sabine Schormann resigned over the issue.

In this case, it seems understandable that the German public felt particularly sensitive about links to antisemitism in their publicly funded art, but the consequences for the festivals Director appear unprecedented.

For well-known poster artist Peter Drew, this high profile controversy reveals some concerning new trends towards binary interpretations of art.

Read: Making great propaganda art

What I see in that Documenta example is a pulling towards singular interpretations of art, rather than being tolerant of multiple interpretations, he told ArtsHub.

I see it as a pull towards understanding art in terms of it meansthis or it meansthat, so artists and curators get pulled into having to define the artwork in thoseterms. And I think youve already lost when youre drawn into having to define your art within thatlimited frame, he said.

For artist Julie Rrap a practitioner who has been at forefront of feminist art in Australia since the mid 70s there are many dangers inherent in binary interpretations of art, especially when pushed to political extremes.

It doesnt matter whether your view [of the art] comes from a far right or far left position both are dangerous because they lack any sense of a middle ground on which to explore ideas, she observed.

Art is about allowing people not to have limits on their imaginations, she continued. So if audiences are starting to look for something political in the work that may or may not be there, and then they are interpreting it in those narrow terms, thats a dangerous direction for art to be heading. Its reducing art to propaganda!

Similarly, Catalan Australian artist Dani Marti who is currently based in Sydney and whose past works have explored explicit ideas around sexuality said that recent trends towards dogmatic political thinking are encroaching on artist and audience freedoms.

Art is a platform where you should be allowed to question certain power structures, Marti told ArtsHub. But the current climate [of political dogma] is absolutely compromising that work and jeopardising creativity.

In response to what has, in recent years, felt like somewhat of a closing-in on artists who question power structures and orthodoxies, the Sydney-based Festival of Dangerous Ideas (established in 2009) has become a sacred space for artists to speak about their work without fear of suppression.

This years festival program which included artist-speakers like Claire G. Coleman and Baduicao has just concluded, and its director Dr Simon Longstaff said these forums remain vital ways for the public to engage with artists difficult ideas.

Art plays an essential role in holding up a very well-polished mirror on society, which inevitably has the capacity of making us uncomfortable, because it presents a view of us that most of us dont want to know about, he told ArtsHub.

So we need to preserve those spaces where its Ok [for artists] to push at the boundaries of whats accepted especially at the moment, where theres a tendency to shut things down.

We need artists to keep pushing at those boundaries to help preserve that middle space [for discussion and debate].

Read: Artist censored from Hong Kong protest exhibition

Longstaff has also observed how artists with contentious ideas are increasingly being caught up in dialogues that unfairly assign them with particular moral labels.

He commented that, It used to be when people disagreed with your ideas theyd say I dont agree with your ideas or your perspective and youd start to explore that. But its now become, I dont agree with your ideas and that means you are a bad person.

For Rrap who lectures in art at the University of Sydney alongside her art practise the effects of these narrow judgements on the next generations of artists is especially concerning.

It does worry me to think that young artists might feel too scared to say anything in their work for fear of being shut down, she said.

Risk is crucial as an artist, and its important to allow artists to step outside those boundaries of convention so they can explore ideas that are occurring to them in their imagination, and we should acknowledge that those ideas are not necessarily connected to real life or reality, Rrap concluded.

View original post here:

What's happening to arts censorship in the age of cancel culture? - ArtsHub

Canada will censor use of indigenous music – SlippediscSlippedisc | The inside track on classical music and related cultures, by Norman Lebrecht -…

norman lebrecht

September 20, 2022

The Canadian Music Centre (CMC) has authorised an indigenous panel to permit or ban use of indigenous material in new compositions.

Composers hav econtacted us in alarm.

Read the new censorship rule:

The Indigenous Advisory Council (IAC) serves at arms length from the CMC on matters related to cultural appropriation and misuse of Indigenous songs, story, and culture. The IAC is a group of Indigenous folks from across Canada with a broad range of expertise in music, curation, museology, performance, and repatriation. Its mandate is to provide recommendations to CMC for appropriately redressing instances of misuse in compositions on an ongoing, case-by-case basis.

This work is made possible with funding from the Canada Council for the Arts and Canadian Heritage to support thinking about these issues in a large-scale policy basis. It is a major priority for the CMC to work with Indigenous leaders to examine and search for resolutions to the use of Indigenous Song and Story in the works of Canadian Composition past, present and future; [to establish] protocols for composers and performers when composing and performing works influenced or based on Indigenous materials (Goal #1, current 2019-2024 Strategic Plan). Having been part of the cause of injury, CMC has to be part of the healing and the solution and take leadership in the healing.T

View original post here:

Canada will censor use of indigenous music - SlippediscSlippedisc | The inside track on classical music and related cultures, by Norman Lebrecht -...

Censorship at Radio TV Mart? Employees of the Historic TV Station Talk About Possible Mass Dismissals – El American

Available: Espaol

According to confidential information accessed by El American, the Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB), which oversees Radio Television Mart, has a list of between 25 and 30 federal employees who could soon be fired from that channel. Since November 2020, right on the brink of the controversial presidential elections, several dozen contractors have been laid off.

At first glance, the matter seems to be a consequence of the budget cuts to be made by the current administration. However, employees and former employees explained to El American that there is strong censorship in the channel and that the budget cut would be one of the numerous measures that have been implemented for months, which would intend to seek to silence both those who discomfort the Cuban regime and those from the United States who are interested in resuming relations with the oldest dictatorship in the hemisphere.

An employee of Radio Television Mart, who asked not to be identified, explained to El American that he has been instructed not to use the word dictatorship in reports and audiovisual products in general. He assured that he also cannot use the word regime and, instead, has been asked to use the word government to refer to Castros tyranny. Likewise, the word dictator is forbidden and the word president must be used, according to our source.

What they tell you had happened during the administration of Barack Obama and Joe Biden, which ended in 2017. Colleagues related to me how they were censored back then. The budget is a pretext, an alibi, an old trick of the socialist clique that has done so much harm to the dream of the visionary Jorge Ms Canosa and the great Ronald Reagan, Luis Leonel Len, a former OCB contractor who worked for years at Radio Televisin Mart, commented to El American.

Radio Televisin Mart has been since its creation a space that is supposed to be dedicated to showing not only Cubans, but the American people and the entire world, the truth of what is happening on the island under a regime that has been in power for decades. The statements and testimonies of employees and former employees about an environment of censorship that would be an open secret are of great concern to the entire Cuban community and to the defenders of freedom of expression.

"*" indicates required fields

Another source contacted by El American pointed out that the cut in funds is functional to continue firing people who are uncomfortable with the interests of the Castro regime. He also assured that what is being experienced in the working environment of the channel is fear.

Luis Leonel confirmed these statements, assuring that if not everybody, a great part of the people are afraid. I was not told that. I lived it. It was sad and frustrating to see how fear is a constant where freedom is supposedly defended. The people I worked with still regret it. And you dont have to be very enlightened to clearly understand that if there is fear, it is because something is very wrong there.

El American also spoke with Isabel Cuervo, a renowned investigative journalist who was fired from Radio TV Mart in 2018. When we asked her if she experienced any kind of censorship at the channel, she answered the following: The biggest censorship that has ever happened in the history of Radio TV Mart was imposed on me, when in October 2018 they censored a report on George Soros, deleted it from all platforms, escorted me out of the building and then subjected me to federal investigation.

In relation to the atmosphere in the media, Cuervo said: With the Soros case they left a strong precedent, but obviously the censorship and silencing of journalists will continue. It is a shame and a real danger that this is happening in the United States.

Regarding the importance and impact of the media, Luis Leonel pointed out that Radio Mart could be the detonator for the Cubans imprisoned on the Island to finally reach the longed-for freedom, which has not yet been achieved and which will not be possible without a media that directly and systematically sends them free information. He also added that deactivating Radio Television Marti would be a great victory for Castroism. They want it as much as they want the Embargo removed and the Guantnamo Naval Base handed over to them, he said.

Legislators from both parties have sent a letter to the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which is in charge of OCB, to reject the budget cut. Mario Daz-Balart, Carlos Gimnez, Mara Elvira Salazar, Senators Marco Rubio and Rick Scott, among others, have stressed the importance of Radio Televisin Mart for the Cuban people and access to free information.

The budget cut for OCB is worrisome and would significantly affect a medium that for a long time has denounced to the world what Cubans suffer. However, the allegations of censorship within the media are even more alarming. Turning off the voices of Radio Television Mart that tell the reality of what is happening under Castros regime would almost be tantamount to legitimizing the Castro dictatorship and Miguel Diaz-Canel before the world. There are no media anywhere in the world that does what Radio Televisin Mart has done for decades in giving voice to the Cuban people.

Vanessa Vallejo. Co-editor-in-chief of El American. Economist. Podcaster. Political and economic analysis of America. Colombian exile in the United States // Vanessa Vallejo. Co-editora en jefe de El American. Economista. Podcaster. Anlisis poltico y econmico de Amrica. Colombiana exiliada en EE. UU.

See more here:

Censorship at Radio TV Mart? Employees of the Historic TV Station Talk About Possible Mass Dismissals - El American

Parents of K-12 students need to be aware of dangerous school board candidates – Arizona Capitol Times

Several groups are doing everything in their power to control the thought processes of the younger generation. Students, faculty, public school administrators, and school board members should not be subjected to this mentality that embraces censorship and a society that does not read books, think independently, learn about history, or appreciate the beauties of nature.

For a majority of the million-plus K-12 children in Arizona, public education is the backbone for their future. It is a travesty that several groups are doing everything in their power to control the thought processes of the younger generation.

This reality is very disruptive to public education. Students, faculty, public school administrators, and school board members should not be subjected to this Fahrenheit 451 mentality that embraces censorship and a society that does not read books, think independently, learn about history, or appreciate the beauties of nature. Dedicated employees of schools and school districts should not have to suffer the consequences from being terrorized by those perpetuating fear mongering and lies.

Joanie Rose

As an eye witness to this extremism and vitriol, I observed these angry education protesters show no respect or understanding for the countless hours teachers spend researching and preparing lessons so their students will be knowledgeable in a competitive world.

It is time to step up and support school officials and teachers who, in todays world, are working under the most difficult of circumstances.

The questionable grownups who attend school board meetings have no good intentions. They participate in public comments not to promote or improve education but to spread unfounded conspiracies like Critical Race Theory (CRT). Nowhere in any Arizona public school system is CRT part of the curriculum.

To make a bad situation worse, the same folks want to remove books while targeting Pulitzer Prize-winning authors and topics that have enlightened students for decades.

Please understand, these people also refused to protect children during the pandemic. They screamed, in mob-like fashion, at school board meetings that students did not need to wear masks or be inoculated despite the advice of highly trained medical professionals, doctors, and scientists who encouraged both measures.

The only way to stop anti-education candidates is VOTE for candidates who actually care about education and the wellbeing of all students. Teachers should be allowed to teach facts and not be intimidated to fictionalize history.

Take time to learn about the men and women running for school board positions. Sadly, many candidates are propped up by anti-public education groups and profiteers such as The Goldwater Institute, Turning Point USA (Charlie Kirk), Freedom Works (Koch Brother-owned), and Purple for Parents (Three Scottsdale Unified School District Governing Board candidates). These national groups and their candidates openly advocate for privatizing our schools through defunding and using vouchers. This action eliminates special needs children from educational opportunities.

School board races arent normally high profile or well-funded, but these groups have vowed to influence school boards and decimate the public institution of education. Deep pocketed millionaires and billionaires (Peter Thiel) will be laughing all the way to the bank on our taxpayer dimes. Please do your homework! Dont just vote for a name or a party, vote for a sincere person you know truly cares about education for all students.

Joanie Rose

Scottsdale

Read more here:

Parents of K-12 students need to be aware of dangerous school board candidates - Arizona Capitol Times

Chinese censors told to drown out posts about food and medicine shortages in the mostly-Uyghur province of Xinjian – ZME Science

In China, social media censors have been ordered to drown out public complaints about food and drug shortages.

China was the first country in the world to put quarantines in place during the Covid-19 pandemic. But the virus still persists there, as everywhere else. The Ili Kazakh autonomous prefecture, also known as Yili, was placed under lockdown in early August this year after a fresh outbreak of the virus, and this move was taken without any official announcement to give the public time to prepare.

Now, one month into the lockdown, locals in Yili have taken to social media to write about their experiences, especially about growing concerns and complaints regarding shortages of food, medication, delays or outright refusals of medical care. But their posts are being drowned out by a flood of innocuous posts dealing with anything from cooking to details of personal moods but not all is as innocent as it seems.

According to a leaked directive published by the China Digital Times, government censors were ordered to open a campaign of comment flooding to hide posts criticising the lockdown or those expressing concern with how the situation is evolving.

There are no subject matter restrictions, the document reads, according to CDTs translation. Content may include domestic life, daily parenting, cooking, or personal moods. All internet commentary personnel should post once an hour (twice in total), but not in rapid succession! Repeat: not in rapid succession!

Sample posts archived by the CDT as a possible example of the comment flooding campaign showed pictures of landscapes or local cuisine. However, they were quickly accused of being attempts to dilute the conversation around the lockdown.

Ili Kazakh is an autonomous prefecture for Kazakh people in Northern Xinjiang the region of China that is traditionally the home of mostly Uyghur people. This province has been the site of a years-long oppression campaign by the central government against the local Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities, and locals believe the poor management of this lockdown is part of that campaign.

Locals concerns were further stoked by the fact that sites near Ili Kazakh, a popular tourist destination, have recently been re-opened to visitors. Despite this, the lockdown is now entering its 40th day with no sign of coming to a close anytime soon.

Although central authorities have denied that anything was going poorly initially, they changed their stance last week and recognized that there have been some issues with the distribution of food and medical supplies. Although they did apologize in a press conference, they shifted the blame squarely onto local officials.

Children who have a 40-degree fever cant even see a doctor, pregnant women cant even get into the hospital, we really cant take this any more, said one reported comment. First they say its fake news, then they apologise, added another. What is real, is that the entire city has been silent for 41 days, said another, according to CDT.

Last week, a health official in Yili said that the remaining lockdowns will be lifted after two to three more rounds of testing, according to the South China Morning Post.

The severity of the lockdown in Yili is bewildering given that only around 220 cases of Covid-19 infections are recorded in the whole Xinjiang province. But the rolling lockdowns continue to be implemented in various areas of China under the countrys dynamic zero containment strategy, in which widespread lockdowns and other restrictions can be implemented suddenly on residences, neighborhoods, or even whole cities, in an attempt to stifle any potential outbreak.

Still, the Chinese Governments use of concentration camps against ethnic Uygurs, in the form of the Xinjiang internment camps, officially called vocational education and training centers, casts a huge shadow of doubt on the Yili lockdown. Even if instituted for public safety, locals are understandably reluctant to assume fair play. The severity of restrictions imposed here, alongside food shortages, in particular, raise genuine concerns from locals which are further fueled by the leaked directive.

Here is the original post:

Chinese censors told to drown out posts about food and medicine shortages in the mostly-Uyghur province of Xinjian - ZME Science

This is the emoji with which anti-vaccines are dodging censorship on Facebook – Gearrice

The conspiracy world celebrates a new chapter in its crusade against humanity. 09/19/2022 14:00

The arguments of anti-vaccine and, in general, the opinions of lovers of conspiracies are so difficult to hold that we will not entertain them. In fact, we have a really fun article on some crazy conspiracy theories if youre interested in the subject and want to be entertained for a while.

Recently, thanks to the information shown on Gizmodo, we have learned how groups dissidents of traditional science and lovers of conspiracies have at emoji of a vegetable as its code in code for circumvent censorship of Mark Zuckerbergs social network. By the way, we also have an article showing the meaning of WhatsApp emoticons.

The carrot is the favorite emoji of anti-vaccines on Facebook

If you take a look at Tweet that we show you under these lines, you will be able to know the story of a man called Marc Owen Jones, who was invited to join an anti-vaccine group on Facebook. What those responsible for the group did not know is that Marc is an associate professor at Hamad bin Khalifa University and investigator about the growing trend for disinformation In the net. Once inside, he was able to verify a strange technique for avoid censorship of the social network. One of the messages it said the following:

My sister, 57, entered the hospital with respiratory problems. She has two and the b.

Given that we are dealing with a group of people against the vaccinesit can be understood that the carrots they are the way to avoid writing said word and, thus, be able to circumvent the algorithm in charge of pointing out the publications that could be problematic. In fact, the attempt to avoid censorship seems evident, given the message posted by Marc, where one of the group leaders type the following:

If a post has been rejected or deleted, it was probably me. As moderators, our primary role is to protect the group from censorship and removal. Encryption is important and carrots, to date, go undetected by artificial intelligence censorship.

It seems that the resemblance of the vegetable with a needle to give injections could be the reason chosen by the group to skip censorship, although the use of emojis from the group is also often observed in other groups. cupcake either shot glasses, English shot is used to name both this type of glass and the injections. assumptions human health monitors continue their crusade against the vaccines and each time they look for new ways to hide among the publications of the different social networks. It seems, at the moment, that Facebook has not taken action in the matter.

Go here to read the rest:

This is the emoji with which anti-vaccines are dodging censorship on Facebook - Gearrice

Censoring books is also about figuring out whats age- and classroom-appropriate – cleveland.com

The Rev. Mary Robin Craig is saddened to think about parents censoring books available to children in school and public libraries (Young readers and the wide world, Sept. 18.). The books she cites that helped her are not the kinds of books of concern today.

We must go to the shelves and read what is being assigned in school, what is age-appropriate, what is vulgar and, perhaps, too explicit. For instance, the nonfiction teen book, All Boys Arent Blue, includes graphic depictions of homosexuality. Some books, like The Bluest Eye, are well-written, yet may not be appropriate for a school assignment because students can be embarrassed to discuss incest aloud in a classroom.

It is not only the subject, but the style, and how the teacher handles the book report. These books still could be available in regular fiction or biography in the public library.

Marjorie Dwyer,

Westlake

Link:

Censoring books is also about figuring out whats age- and classroom-appropriate - cleveland.com

Conservative book censors and conspiracy theorists don’t even win in Boise The Nevada Independent – The Nevada Independent

Look, I was raised by Trekkies. I get it.

I understand what its like to follow a show religiously, to trace its ups and downs, and to debate endlessly with fans of other franchises over which franchise is better. I know what its like to dedicate ones time to arguing over whether the U.S.S. Enterprise could defeat an Imperial Star Destroyer (though I prefer Star Trek over Star Wars, not a chance Star Destroyers are simply too large). I know what its like to argue over subliminal, liminal and superliminal messages inserted into episodes by oft-harried writers. I know how much fun it can be to chew on plot inconsistencies or to debate the canonicity of various third-party sources.

At no point in my life, however, did I ever pretend I was doing politics by doing so. The same, regrettably, cant be said for the consumers of certain purveyors of conservative news commentary.

This is the only explanation I can give for why school board candidates the country over even in Washoe County are running on the same platform: Our nations schools need to be taken back from an ultra-left curriculum which teaches children various harmful theories (the label preceding each theory rotates depending on who the Big Bad is each week; the described content of each, however, is intentionally divorced from any recognizable epistemology). If you elect them, they promise to ban harmful books from our school libraries and fire if not prosecute anyone who disagrees.

Which schools specifically are teaching this? Why, our schools, of course all schools, whether theyre located within walking distance of the corner of Haight and Ashbury in San Francisco or the suburbs of southern Idaho, all share the same Marxist curriculum, library books and teachers. How do they know this? Well, they saw it on LibsofTikTok. Does that all sound very silly and ignorant to you? Then you might be a groomer.

To be blunt, this is all about as real as any piece of halfway immersive science fiction, which is a long winded way of saying its not real at all. There are, indeed, schools just as there are, indeed, recognizable bits of physics in the Star Trek universe. Past that, the connection between reality and fantasy is only as strong as the writers need it to be to advance each plot each plot and talking point being whatever is needed to keep viewers afraid enough to buy dodgy supplements, fake gold coins, and overpriced emergency survival supplies. Since each talking point is based on the news and a carefully curated collection of home videos instead of The Silmarillion or the Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual, however, they feel real.

They are not, however, real enough to a large enough population to win general elections not even in comparatively conservative Boise.

Boise is both the capital of and largest city in Idaho, one of the most consistently conservative states in the country. Idahos voters are so conservative, in fact, that Donald Trump received a larger majority in Idaho in the last election than he received in Nevadas own Douglas County. Douglas County, for perspective, was the first, last, and thus far only constituency to elect Danny Tarkanian to something in a general election a decision they openly regretted because Danny and his wife were somehow too liberal (they refused to support some of the internet trolls running for statewide office under the Republican banner, in other words) for their sensibilities.

Now, Boise is admittedly a bit more liberal than the rest of the state, but its still no Democratic Party stronghold. If you flip Washoe Countys last election results on their head if, that is, you take the percentages President Biden (a bit over 50 percent) and Donald Trump (a bit over 46 percent) each received and give them to the opposing candidate youd end up with the most recent presidential election results in Boises home county, Ada (Boise, confusingly enough, is not located in considerably more conservative Boise County).

Put briefly, Boise may not be as ruby red as the rest of the Gem State, but its still more supportive than not of Republican candidates and causes and certainly more supportive of Republicans than any county of similar population in Nevada.

Unsurprisingly, then, incumbent politicians in Boise prefer to position themselves on the conservative side, culturally and politically speaking. Thats perhaps why, when Steve Schmidt an incumbent member of the Boise School Board received an endorsement from the Idaho Liberty Dogs, a hardline conservative group that previously gained notoriety by claiming libraries in neighboring Meridian were distributing smut-filled pornography, he opted first for nuance over outright denunciation.

Depending upon your personal beliefs, that (endorsement) may give you cause for concern or comfort, Schmidt wrote in a since-deleted Facebook post. I am not a member of their group and I dont represent them.

That, even in comparatively conservative Boise even for a widely respected incumbent who received the support of past superintendents and trustees, as well as the local teachers union wasnt anywhere near strong enough. Local leaders criticized both the endorsement and Schmidts reaction. The Idaho Liberty Dogs, demonstrating their character, responded by comparing an opposing rabbi to Hitler and claiming he supports groups that indoctrinate and groom our children. All of that led the Idaho Statesman to endorse his opponent: Shiva Rajbhandari, an 18-year-old Boise High student who pledged to take a gap year before college to complete his term if the rest of the school board couldnt find a suitable student to replace him after he graduates.

On September 7th, Boises comparatively conservative voters got their chance to weigh in.

The result? 56 percent of the voters in that election decided theyd rather have an 18-year-old high school student who might leave the position in a year or two than a previously respected incumbent who didnt have the sense or the spine to clearly distance himself from a bunch of rabid conservative propaganda junkies.

To be clear, Steve Schmidt didnt run as someone who would ban books or fight some esoteric sociological theory prepended with Marxist in the title for narrative effect. He ran as an establishment conservative the sort Nevada used to produce on the regular. He was, by many accounts, an excellent and professional school board member.

He was, in other words, a better candidate for school board than any of the candidates challenging the incumbents on Washoe Countys ballots.

But he still wasnt good enough. When given an opportunity to distance himself from a pack of overzealous fans living in political fantasy worlds, he refused to channel his inner William Shatner and tell them to get a life and that was all it took to lose him the election in Boise.

Not Reno. Not Las Vegas. Not San Francisco. Refusing to stand up against conservative medias most fervent, overzealous fans lost Schmidt the election in Boise.

It certainly must not have helped Schmidts cause that the rest of Idaho is ruby red enough for those same fans to seize political control from time to time. Nampa, one of Boises suburbs, recently banned 22 books from their schools libraries because they allegedly contained pornography, including Margaret Atwoods The Handmaids Tale. Meanwhile, the Idaho House (the states lowest legislative chamber in more ways than one) tried to pass a law House Bill 666, amusingly enough that would criminally charge librarians if a minor checked out a book that was considered harmful by that august body; that bill ultimately died in the state senate.

Additionally, since Idaho is so conservative, its also paradoxically a punching bag by the very same conservative media some of its residents love so much. After all, if even Idaho is teaching students porn literacy (its not, but dont let that get in the way of a good plotline), surely every other school in the country including the one in your neighborhood must be so much worse!

The worst part, if youre a politician trying to build a constituency, is there frankly arent that many fans. Only three million or so people watch Tucker Carlson if you add up everyone in the country who watches cable news commentary at the same time, you reach a high water mark of around six million viewers out of a nation of over 330 million. Thats not even 2 percent of the population. Speaking as a now-former longtime member of the Libertarian Party, I know a thing or two about trying to win elections with only 1-2 percent of the electorate it doesnt work, especially when that 1-2 percent is more interested in demonstrating loyalty to their fellow fans than they are in getting outside, touching grass, and maybe talking to a neighbor or two.

Boises voters saw firsthand what happens when you let the fans take over the show. Its bad enough when it happens to a beloved media franchise (looking at you, The Rise of Skywalker). Its considerably worse when it leads to school board members bullying children because of their gender identity, books getting removed from school libraries, and politicians leading witch hunts against Marxist indoctrination from the capitol grounds because the fans favorite talking heads on television or social media showed them a 30-second viral video which proves there are luxury gay space communists infiltrating every branch of Idahos Idahos! government.

So they voted accordingly.

The rest of us, meanwhile, just wish these dorks who keep bringing guns to school board meetings, threatening to ban books, and driving our existing board members towards a mental health crisis would just go home and leave the families of Washoe County alone. Our schools have enough problems without candidates role playing as fourteenth-level Freedom Warriors fighting the Dark Lord of Marxism on the taxpayers dime.

David Colborne ran for office twice and served on the executive committees for his state and county Libertarian Party chapters. He is now an IT manager, a registered nonpartisan voter, the father of two sons, and a weekly opinion columnist for The Nevada Independent. You can follow him on Twitter @DavidColborne or email him at [emailprotected].

Conservative book censors and conspiracy theorists dont even win in Boise

Look, I was raised by Trekkies. I get it.

I understand what its like to follow a show religiously, to trace its ups and downs, and to debate endlessly with fans of other franchises over which franchise is better. I know what its like to dedicate ones time to arguing over whether the U.S.S. Enterprise could defeat an Imperial Star Destroyer (though I prefer Star Trek over Star Wars, not a chance Star Destroyers are simply too large). I know what its like to argue over subliminal, liminal and superliminal messages inserted into episodes by oft-harried writers. I know how much fun it can be to chew on plot inconsistencies or to debate the canonicity of various third-party sources.

At no point in my life, however, did I ever pretend I was doing politics by doing so. The same, regrettably, cant be said for the consumers of certain purveyors of conservative news commentary.

This is the only explanation I can give for why school board candidates the country over even in Washoe County are running on the same platform: Our nations schools need to be taken back from an ultra-left curriculum which teaches children various harmful theories (the label preceding each theory rotates depending on who the Big Bad is each week; the described content of each, however, is intentionally divorced from any recognizable epistemology). If you elect them, they promise to ban harmful books from our school libraries and fire if not prosecute anyone who disagrees.

Which schools specifically are teaching this? Why, our schools, of course all schools, whether theyre located within walking distance of the corner of Haight and Ashbury in San Francisco or the suburbs of southern Idaho, all share the same Marxist curriculum, library books and teachers. How do they know this? Well, they saw it on LibsofTikTok. Does that all sound very silly and ignorant to you? Then you might be a groomer.

To be blunt, this is all about as real as any piece of halfway immersive science fiction, which is a long winded way of saying its not real at all. There are, indeed, schools just as there are, indeed, recognizable bits of physics in the Star Trek universe. Past that, the connection between reality and fantasy is only as strong as the writers need it to be to advance each plot each plot and talking point being whatever is needed to keep viewers afraid enough to buy dodgy supplements, fake gold coins, and overpriced emergency survival supplies. Since each talking point is based on the news and a carefully curated collection of home videos instead of The Silmarillion or the Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual, however, they feel real.

They are not, however, real enough to a large enough population to win general elections not even in comparatively conservative Boise.

Boise is both the capital of and largest city in Idaho, one of the most consistently conservative states in the country. Idahos voters are so conservative, in fact, that Donald Trump received a larger majority in Idaho in the last election than he received in Nevadas own Douglas County. Douglas County, for perspective, was the first, last, and thus far only constituency to elect Danny Tarkanian to something in a general election a decision they openly regretted because Danny and his wife were somehow too liberal (they refused to support some of the internet trolls running for statewide office under the Republican banner, in other words) for their sensibilities.

Now, Boise is admittedly a bit more liberal than the rest of the state, but its still no Democratic Party stronghold. If you flip Washoe Countys last election results on their head if, that is, you take the percentages President Biden (a bit over 50 percent) and Donald Trump (a bit over 46 percent) each received and give them to the opposing candidate youd end up with the most recent presidential election results in Boises home county, Ada (Boise, confusingly enough, is not located in considerably more conservative Boise County).

Put briefly, Boise may not be as ruby red as the rest of the Gem State, but its still more supportive than not of Republican candidates and causes and certainly more supportive of Republicans than any county of similar population in Nevada.

Unsurprisingly, then, incumbent politicians in Boise prefer to position themselves on the conservative side, culturally and politically speaking. Thats perhaps why, when Steve Schmidt an incumbent member of the Boise School Board received an endorsement from the Idaho Liberty Dogs, a hardline conservative group that previously gained notoriety by claiming libraries in neighboring Meridian were distributing smut-filled pornography, he opted first for nuance over outright denunciation.

Depending upon your personal beliefs, that (endorsement) may give you cause for concern or comfort, Schmidt wrote in a since-deleted Facebook post. I am not a member of their group and I dont represent them.

That, even in comparatively conservative Boise even for a widely respected incumbent who received the support of past superintendents and trustees, as well as the local teachers union wasnt anywhere near strong enough. Local leaders criticized both the endorsement and Schmidts reaction. The Idaho Liberty Dogs, demonstrating their character, responded by comparing an opposing rabbi to Hitler and claiming he supports groups that indoctrinate and groom our children. All of that led the Idaho Statesman to endorse his opponent: Shiva Rajbhandari, an 18-year-old Boise High student who pledged to take a gap year before college to complete his term if the rest of the school board couldnt find a suitable student to replace him after he graduates.

On September 7th, Boises comparatively conservative voters got their chance to weigh in.

The result? 56 percent of the voters in that election decided theyd rather have an 18-year-old high school student who might leave the position in a year or two than a previously respected incumbent who didnt have the sense or the spine to clearly distance himself from a bunch of rabid conservative propaganda junkies.

To be clear, Steve Schmidt didnt run as someone who would ban books or fight some esoteric sociological theory prepended with Marxist in the title for narrative effect. He ran as an establishment conservative the sort Nevada used to produce on the regular. He was, by many accounts, an excellent and professional school board member.

He was, in other words, a better candidate for school board than any of the candidates challenging the incumbents on Washoe Countys ballots.

But he still wasnt good enough. When given an opportunity to distance himself from a pack of overzealous fans living in political fantasy worlds, he refused to channel his inner William Shatner and tell them to get a life and that was all it took to lose him the election in Boise.

Not Reno. Not Las Vegas. Not San Francisco. Refusing to stand up against conservative medias most fervent, overzealous fans lost Schmidt the election in Boise.

It certainly must not have helped Schmidts cause that the rest of Idaho is ruby red enough for those same fans to seize political control from time to time. Nampa, one of Boises suburbs, recently banned 22 books from their schools libraries because they allegedly contained pornography, including Margaret Atwoods The Handmaids Tale. Meanwhile, the Idaho House (the states lowest legislative chamber in more ways than one) tried to pass a law House Bill 666, amusingly enough that would criminally charge librarians if a minor checked out a book that was considered harmful by that august body; that bill ultimately died in the state senate.

Additionally, since Idaho is so conservative, its also paradoxically a punching bag by the very same conservative media some of its residents love so much. After all, if even Idaho is teaching students porn literacy (its not, but dont let that get in the way of a good plotline), surely every other school in the country including the one in your neighborhood must be so much worse!

The worst part, if youre a politician trying to build a constituency, is there frankly arent that many fans. Only three million or so people watch Tucker Carlson if you add up everyone in the country who watches cable news commentary at the same time, you reach a high water mark of around six million viewers out of a nation of over 330 million. Thats not even 2 percent of the population. Speaking as a now-former longtime member of the Libertarian Party, I know a thing or two about trying to win elections with only 1-2 percent of the electorate it doesnt work, especially when that 1-2 percent is more interested in demonstrating loyalty to their fellow fans than they are in getting outside, touching grass, and maybe talking to a neighbor or two.

Boises voters saw firsthand what happens when you let the fans take over the show. Its bad enough when it happens to a beloved media franchise (looking at you, The Rise of Skywalker). Its considerably worse when it leads to school board members bullying children because of their gender identity, books getting removed from school libraries, and politicians leading witch hunts against Marxist indoctrination from the capitol grounds because the fans favorite talking heads on television or social media showed them a 30-second viral video which proves there are luxury gay space communists infiltrating every branch of Idahos Idahos! government.

So they voted accordingly.

The rest of us, meanwhile, just wish these dorks who keep bringing guns to school board meetings, threatening to ban books, and driving our existing board members towards a mental health crisis would just go home and leave the families of Washoe County alone. Our schools have enough problems without candidates role playing as fourteenth-level Freedom Warriors fighting the Dark Lord of Marxism on the taxpayers dime.

David Colborne ran for office twice and served on the executive committees for his state and county Libertarian Party chapters. He is now an IT manager, a registered nonpartisan voter, the father of two sons, and a weekly opinion columnist for The Nevada Independent. You can follow him on Twitter @DavidColborne or email him at [emailprotected].

See more here:

Conservative book censors and conspiracy theorists don't even win in Boise The Nevada Independent - The Nevada Independent

Open source provides the building blocks for future technology innovation – Bizcommunity.com

Open source is by no means a new technology, but it has matured over the past 30-plus years and with the latest wave of digital transformation, its role has become increasingly prominent. In the everyday business sense, it is still a cost-effective option for operating systems, databases, and analytical tools. However, where the nature and benefits of open source are truly being realised is in the artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning spaces.

Sumit Sharma, enterprise architect and head of advisory services at In2IT | image supplied

The open, community-driven, and collaborative environment created by open source is the perfect ground for these new-age initiatives, fostering innovation while ensuring that there is no single entity driving the agenda around the technology that will shape our future.

Open-source solutions remain a viable option for organisations looking to reduce capital and operational expenses and work within increasingly tight budget constraints. The Covid economy has driven more businesses than before to consider these types of solutions.

The speed of innovation is also one of the appeals of open source, and the platform lends itself well to projects that require high levels of customisation. However, while the barrier to entry for proprietary software and systems is financial capital, there remains a barrier to entry around open source in the form of human capital.

While licensing costs are reduced and the source code is open so it can more easily be tailored and customised, open-source solutions are only free to a certain extent, and there are certain trade-offs. The skills required to develop and maintain software and systems using open source are not something that every business has or can afford to keep in-house.

For this reason, although the energy and technology sectors in Southern Africa are adopting open source, it is not the preferred solution in this region, or up into Africa, due to the well-known skills shortage and still-maturing market. There remains a lot of room for growth.

The high barrier to entry in terms of skills and knowledge is one of the main detractors for shifting to open-source solutions, especially in the South African context and through Africa in general. The decision of whether or not open source is a viable platform for any business depends on the needs and personality of the organisation.

A conservative organisation that appreciates the presence of the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) is not well suited to open source, nor is an enterprise that is looking to outsource the majority of the IT function. Your IT partner can assist with ensuring the correct decision is made around the right business solutions.

However, open source is providing the building blocks for future technology innovation. It is seeing a lot of development, major proprietary vendors are acquiring open source houses, and new technologies including AI, machine learning and blockchain innovations are being driven by open source.

The futuristic concept of Artificial General Intelligence or AGI is something that can only come from the collaborative environment of open source, as is the evolution of natural language processing to natural language understanding.

Open source is driving the future of technology. It is therefore an option that is worth exploring for many businesses. To really exploit the benefits, skills and experience in the code are critical, and where businesses cannot maintain these in-house, the right IT partner is the key. A specialised IT partner can also provide maintenance and support to ensure solutions continue to deliver as required.

Originally posted here:

Open source provides the building blocks for future technology innovation - Bizcommunity.com

Why You Need to Empower Your Developers – DevOps.com

In recent years, the demand for software developers worldwide has increased. However, in 2020, when the pandemic hit, many CIOs pulled back considerably on their IT spending. This trend has quickly reversed. In 2022, worldwide IT spending is expected to reach $4.4 trillion. Additionally, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment in software development is projected to rise by 22%.

Although organizations across several industries are increasing investment into IT, the supply of technology talent has struggled to keep pace. With the demand for creativity, developers understand their importance and can better dictate their terms including higher salary compensation and enhanced benefits. Organizations that dont meet these expectations risk losing coveted talent.

Remote work continues to be a top priority for many developers, along with great company culture. To create a positive work environment for developers, business leaders must offer a culture that makes tech employees feel a sense of belonging and purpose while working remotely. Many developers also want opportunities for growth and the ability to provide agile and innovative toolsets to help increase productivity and collaboration.

Lets discuss some of the ways modern organizations can still empower developers and how business leaders can build a workplace culture that attracts some of the best developers in the business.

Open source usage has increased significantly in the workplace and continues to be a formative resource for developers. The open source community provides many new technologies that developers seek and even require in order to work at the top of their abilities. For example, open source provides some of the most popular programming languages available, including Javascript, C+++, and Python. The presence of multiple languages makes it easier for developers to write code and produce high-quality work efficiently.

Open source communities help developers build their skills and allow them to customize their technology stacks, as a result allowing them to optimize their productivity and learn different techniques from other open source projects. There is little to no debate that open source is critical to the tech industry and developers. Embracing open source can increase satisfaction and create a better workforce overall.

In the past, office perks such as free food and collaborative social areas were used to attract new employees and retain current employees. However, in the remote work world, these can no longer remain a priority. Instead, business leaders should prioritize the holistic professional experience that their organization provides its employees. For developers, in particular, building this experience falls on CIOs and IT leaders to ensure they are providing workplace satisfaction, modern technology and flexible processes. To do so, they need to focus on tools that promote productivity and communication.

Most employees are familiar with the workflow software and collaboration tools that many workplaces provide. Without these offerings, remote workers would feel confused by their workload at the worst and adrift from their co-workers at best. For developers, however, these general collaboration tools wont cut it, as they are poorly suited for engineering workflows. General collaborative software doesnt offer the ability for deep customization, nor do they adapt natively to deploy on-prem or in the private cloud. As a result, developers have little to no use for these tools.

And that lacking sense of utility makes a crucial difference. Developer burnout is at an all-time high and inefficient workflows can keep teams from performing at their best. Or, worse, it can frustrate individual employees, leading to lower retention rates and less attractive offerings for prospective employees. Business leaders looking to offer developers an improved working environment should provide a more integrated, developer-oriented tech stack.

While the market has changed, for many developers, fragmented tools remain a top productivity challenge. Investing in modern tools and programming languages while also removing tech complexities are the keys to improving productivity and simultaneously creating a better developer experience. This is why organizations must implement open source applications so developers can have complete visibility and control over the entire stack.

With tool fragmentation causing a number of distractions, developers can become frustrated and spend time responding to every individual incident. This poses the threat of a developer losing their love of the work. By doing away with fragmentation from old technology and selecting relevant solutions, business leaders allow developers to do what they do best: Develop software.

When organizational leaders empower their developers, they in turn find their product teams are more productive and feel more tied to the organization as well as their customers and each other. Thus, what is best for developers is best for the organization at large.

Excerpt from:

Why You Need to Empower Your Developers - DevOps.com