{"id":4528,"date":"2014-02-15T00:44:19","date_gmt":"2014-02-15T05:44:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.opensource.im\/?p=4528"},"modified":"2014-02-15T00:44:19","modified_gmt":"2014-02-15T05:44:19","slug":"pgp-encryption-has-had-stay-powering-but-does-it-meet-todays-enterprise-demands","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/encryption\/pgp-encryption-has-had-stay-powering-but-does-it-meet-todays-enterprise-demands.php","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;PGP&#8217; encryption has had stay-powering but does it meet today&#8217;s enterprise demands?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    PGP encryption, as industry old-timers know, started out as    \"Pretty Good Privacy\" invented by Phil Zimmermann in 1991, and    since then, was sold on to various corporate owners until it    ended in the hands of Symantec in 2010. While it is a widely    used vintage brands, does PGP public-key encryption still meet    today's enterprise demands, given the rise of cloud computing    and mobile?  <\/p>\n<p>    Enterprise managers are somewhat mixed on that, though PGP,    over two decades old, is so well known that Symantec, which    dropped the PGP moniker in favor of \"Symantec Encryption,\"    still reminds everyone it's \"powered by PGP technology.\" In    addition, there's \"OpenPGP,\" the IETF standard that was    championed by Phil Zimmermann, that can be implemented by    companies without licensing.  <\/p>\n<p>    Symantec declines to discuss how many customers it has exactly    in the PGP realm, but it does point out that Symantec has    invested resources in developing what it inherited with PGP.    For example, Symantec offers client app software for both Apple    iOS and Google Android devices as part of its Desktop Email    Encryption. Symantec says its email encryption encrypts e-mail    directly from an end user machine. The result, according to    Symantec, is encrypted mail is delivered directly to a user's    device and they use the Symantec Mail Encryptor App to reply.  <\/p>\n<p>    +Also on Network World:     The weirdest, wackiest and coolest sci\/tech stories of 2013    |     The worst security SNAFUs of 2013 +  <\/p>\n<p>    But despite this kind of PGP-related development work, one    sticking point is managing the digital certificates needed for    end-to-end encryption and decryption, especially when it comes    to sharing files securely between two separate companies as    outside business partners.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"It's too problematic,\" says Yuval Illuz, associate vice    president and head of global infrastructure and IT operations    at network equipment company ECI Telecom about digital    certificate management among business partners. \"It's not    something you need today. You change suppliers all too often.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Illuz said his company has migrated off the PGP-based Symantec    Encryption e-mail and filing sharing software that the firm    once used for secure communications with business partners.    Instead, ECI adopted a different type of exchange, the RSAccess    product from Safe-T, in which two nodes are set up on each side    of a firewall to support requests for sensitive data from    suppliers, business partners and customers. It can also create    directories for the cloud-based Dropbox service. Everything is    encrypted but it doesn't depend on certificates, but strong    passwords, to get information, he says.  <\/p>\n<p>    But ECI is sticking with Symantec Encryption for some things,    particularly for in-house use. \"The laptop encryption for PGP,    we are still using it,\" he says, expressing confidence about    the security and manageability involved in it.  <\/p>\n<p>    Since acquiring PGP, Symantec has released secure file-sharing    with Dropbox in what it calls its File Share Encryption    integration with Dropbox. Symantec says it works by simply    checking a box in the management server so anything sent to    Dropbox is automatically encrypted with the appropriate keys.  <\/p>\n<p>    Not everyone, however, feels the need to migrate away from    managing certificates with business partners.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the rest here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/rss.feedsportal.com\/c\/570\/f\/499783\/s\/3511f38f\/sc\/21\/l\/0L0Smacworld0O0Cmacsoftware0Cnews0Cindex0Bcfm0Dnewsid0F34947940Golo0Frss\/story01.htm\" title=\"'PGP' encryption has had stay-powering but does it meet today's enterprise demands?\">'PGP' encryption has had stay-powering but does it meet today's enterprise demands?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> PGP encryption, as industry old-timers know, started out as \"Pretty Good Privacy\" invented by Phil Zimmermann in 1991, and since then, was sold on to various corporate owners until it ended in the hands of Symantec in 2010. While it is a widely used vintage brands, does PGP public-key encryption still meet today's enterprise demands, given the rise of cloud computing and mobile? Enterprise managers are somewhat mixed on that, though PGP, over two decades old, is so well known that Symantec, which dropped the PGP moniker in favor of \"Symantec Encryption,\" still reminds everyone it's \"powered by PGP technology.\" In addition, there's \"OpenPGP,\" the IETF standard that was championed by Phil Zimmermann, that can be implemented by companies without licensing. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-encryption"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4528"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4528"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4528\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}