If Bradley Manning had stayed Bradley Manning, would he still be in prison? If Bradley Manning had stayed Bradley Manning, would he be basking in celebrity, enjoying fawning photo shoots? Given the magnitude of his crimes, I dare say that hed be in prison today if he still identified as a man. Then hed be nothing but what he actually is, a garden-variety traitor a faithless soldier who should count himself fortunate not to face capital punishment. <\/p>\n
Its worth remembering what he did. He disclosed, in a gigantic document dump, more than a million pages of classified information, including information about American military operations, American diplomacy, and American allies. The Obama administration was forced to rush to safety foreign friends whom Manning had outed as helping Americans. He broke faith with every relevant provision of the Armys warrior ethos he abandoned his mission, he actively aided the enemy, and he acted with stunning disregard for the lives of his comrades. He did so because, acting on his own authority, he decided he wanted to stimulate worldwide discussion, debate, and reforms. <\/p>\n
To be clear, this wasnt whistleblowing. He didnt identify a specific wrong and expose it responsibly while taking care to minimize the harm of disclosure. He just disclosed documents without regard for their contents. He didnt know if anyone would die because of his actions. He didnt know to what extent vital missions or programs would be compromised. He just did what he wanted to do. There was no honor in his action. None. <\/p>\n
And now look at him. Hes the subject of a fawning Vogue profile and photo shoot: <\/p>\n
In fact, hes an LGBT celebrity now, swarmed at public events and even featured at New Yorks Pride March, where he waved from a drop-top Nissan alongside Gavin Grimm. When Trump issued a series of tweets declaring a ban on transgender soldiers in the military, media outlets flocked to cover Mannings response. But one wonders, do the transgender soldiers actually serving look at Chelsea Manning as a poster child for trans service? <\/p>\n
But no matter. For many leftists, Manning offers the irresistible combination radical criminal acts combined with revolutionary identity. Its Radical Chic all over again, this time through the lens of latest civil-rights fashion, transgender rights <\/p>\n
The radical quarters of the Left have a long history of excusing and celebrating even the most vile of criminals so long as they have the right revolutionary politics. Disturbingly, that celebration leaks even into organizations that are billed as meanstream. Recall, it was just last month the Womens March tweeted its appreciation for convicted cop-killer and FBI most-wanted terrorist Assata Shakur: <\/p>\n
Earlier this summer, New Yorks Puerto Rican Day Parade sought to honor convicted terrorist Oscar Lopez Rivera as a National Freedom Hero. Under pressure, he decided to forgo that honor, but he was featured in a float anyway and parts of the crowd gave him a heros welcome. <\/p>\n
These kinds of celebrations are not just morally abhorrent; theyre deeply polarizing. They represent the idea that the rule of law even when the subject is murder or treason is contingent upon the politics and racial or gender identity of the lawbreaker. Americans on opposing sides of the ideological divide are given a signal that when it comes to advancing the radical cause, not even human life or national security can stand in the way. There are no lines that cant be crossed. <\/p>\n
This is what radical identity politics does. It twists and distorts normal moral analysis. It declares that the ends justify the means, and then goes even farther to say, By any means necessary. This is an unacceptable ethic not just for a constitutional republic but for any form of civil society. Allegedly mainstream media outlets, politicians, or organizations that honor or respect the likes of Manning, Rivera, or Shakur cover themselves in shame. <\/p>\n
READ MORE: NR Editorial: The Injustice of Communting Mannings Sentence Chelsea Manning Is Not a Whistleblower Chelsea Manning and the Problem with Pronouns <\/p>\n
David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and an attorney. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n