{"id":32475,"date":"2017-07-09T15:41:16","date_gmt":"2017-07-09T19:41:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.opensource.im\/uncategorized\/global-coalition-urges-five-eyes-to-respect-encryption-ifex.php"},"modified":"2017-07-09T15:41:16","modified_gmt":"2017-07-09T19:41:16","slug":"global-coalition-urges-five-eyes-to-respect-encryption-ifex","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/encryption\/global-coalition-urges-five-eyes-to-respect-encryption-ifex.php","title":{"rendered":"Global coalition urges &quot;Five Eyes&quot; to respect encryption &#8211; IFEX"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    This statement was originally published on article19.org on 4 July 2017.  <\/p>\n<p>    ARTICLE 19 joins 82 other organisations in the following    letter, calling on governments to protect strong    encryption.  <\/p>\n<p>    To the leaders of the world's governments,  <\/p>\n<p>    We urge you to protect the security of your citizens, your    economy, and your government by supporting the development and    use of secure communications tools and technologies, rejecting    policies that would prevent or undermine the use of strong    encryption, and urging other leaders to do the same.  <\/p>\n<p>    Encryption tools, technologies, and services are essential to    protect against harm and to shield our digital infrastructure    and personal communications from unauthorized access. The    ability to freely develop and use encryption provides the    cornerstone for today's global economy. Economic growth in the    digital age is powered by the ability to trust and authenticate    our interactions and communicate and conduct business securely,    both within and across borders.  <\/p>\n<p>    Some of the most noted technologists and experts on encryption    recently explained (PDF) that laws or policies that undermine    encryption would \"force a U-turn from the best practices now    being deployed to make the Internet more secure,\" \"would    substantially increase system complexity\" and raise associated    costs, and \"would create concentrated targets that could    attract bad actors.\" The absence of encryption facilitates easy    access to sensitive personal data, including financial and    identity information, by criminals and other malicious actors.    Once obtained, sensitive data can be sold, publicly posted, or    used to blackmail or embarrass an individual. Additionally,    insufficiently encrypted devices or hardware are prime targets    for criminals.  <\/p>\n<p>    The United Nations Special Rapporteur for freedom of expression    has noted, \"encryption and anonymity, and the security concepts    behind them, provide the privacy and security necessary for the    exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression in    the digital age.\" As we move toward connecting the next billion    users, restrictions on encryption in any country will likely    have global impact. Encryption and other anonymizing tools and    technologies enable law yers, journalists, whistleblowers, and    organizers to communicate freely across borders and to work to    better their communities. It also assures users of the    integrity of their data and authenticates individuals to    companies, governments, and one another.  <\/p>\n<p>    We encourage you to support the safety and security of users by    strengthening the integrity of communications and systems. All    governments should reject laws, policies, or other mandates or    practices, including secret agreements with companies, that    limit access to or undermine encryption and other secure    communications tools and technologies.  <\/p>\n<p>    Users should have the option to use - and companies the option    to provide - the strongest encryption available, including    end-to-end encryption, without fear that governments will    compel access to the content, metadata, or encryption keys    without due process and respect for human rights. Accordingly:  <\/p>\n<p>     Governments should not ban or otherwise limit user access to    encryption in any form or otherwise prohibit the implementation    or use of encryption by grade or type;  <\/p>\n<p>     Governments should not mandate the design or implementation    of \"backdoors\" or vulnerabilities into tools, technologies, or    services;  <\/p>\n<p>     Governments should not require that tools, technologies, or    services are designed or developed to allow for third- party    access to unencrypted data or encryption keys;  <\/p>\n<p>     Governments should not seek to weaken or undermine encryption    standards or intentionally influence the establishment of    encryption standards except to promote a higher level of    information security. No government should mandate insecure    encryption algorithms, standards, tools, or technologies; and  <\/p>\n<p>     Governments should not, either by private or public    agreement, compel or pressure an entity to engage in activity    that is inconsistent with the above tenets.  <\/p>\n<p>     Strong encryption and the secure tools and systems that rely    on it are critical to improving cybersecurity, fostering the    digital economy, and protecting users. Our continued ability to    leverage the internet for global growth and prosperity and as a    tool for organizers and activists requires the ability and the    right to communicate privately and securely through trustworthy    networks.  <\/p>\n<p>    We look forward to working together toward a more secure    future.  <\/p>\n<p>    Read the letter in full  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the article here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ifex.org\/international\/2017\/07\/07\/five-eyes-respect-encryption\/\" title=\"Global coalition urges &quot;Five Eyes&quot; to respect encryption - IFEX\">Global coalition urges &quot;Five Eyes&quot; to respect encryption - IFEX<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> This statement was originally published on article19.org on 4 July 2017. ARTICLE 19 joins 82 other organisations in the following letter, calling on governments to protect strong encryption<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32475","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-encryption"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32475"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32475"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32475\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32475"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32475"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}