{"id":29581,"date":"2015-03-09T20:41:01","date_gmt":"2015-03-10T00:41:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.opensource.im\/uncategorized\/google-relaxes-mandatory-encryption-requirement-for-android-lollipop-devices.php"},"modified":"2015-03-09T20:41:01","modified_gmt":"2015-03-10T00:41:01","slug":"google-relaxes-mandatory-encryption-requirement-for-android-lollipop-devices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/encryption\/google-relaxes-mandatory-encryption-requirement-for-android-lollipop-devices.php","title":{"rendered":"Google relaxes mandatory encryption requirement for Android Lollipop devices"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Google has quietly backed    away from a pledge that new Android devices running Lollipop    would have full-disk encryption enabled by    default.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to an     Ars Technica report, multiple devices are shipping without    the encryption enabled by default, like the new Moto E. A    subtle change has been introduced to     Android's documentedencryption requirements, stating    that it's \"very strongly recommended, as we expect this to    change to must in the future versions of Android.\" (See section    9.9 of the linked PDF.)  <\/p>\n<p>    This indicates that Google    still intends to make device encryption a requirement at some    point, but there is some kind of engineering issue that makes    the company feel it can't force all its hardware partners to    get on board.  <\/p>\n<p>    Testing from AnandTech in    November showed that     encryption devastated the Nexus 6's storage performance,    with encrypted devices being anywhere from 50.5 to 80.7 percent    slower than an unencrypted Nexus 6, depending on what was being    measured. That sort of performance drop-off may have spurred    Google's softened stance on device encryption, at least for    now.  <\/p>\n<p>    We'll keep an eye on all the    new phones coming out of Mobile World Congress and    elsewhere this year to see how this plays out.  <\/p>\n<p>    Why this    matters: Device encryption is an important security    matter, especially in the post-Snowden era, and it's    disappointing to see Google backtrack on this. At the very    least the Android documentation indicates the company is still    committed to making this happen, as full-disk encryption    protects your data from unauthorized entry by hacking or other    government agencies. It also makes it unreadable when it's time    to sell off your phone for the latest and greatest    device.  <\/p>\n<p>        Derek Walter is a freelance technology writer based in        Northern California. He is the author of Learning MIT App        Inventor, a hands-on guide to building your own Android        apps.        More by Derek        Walter      <\/p>\n<p>        Your message has been sent.      <\/p>\n<p>        There was an error emailing this page.      <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more from the original source:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.pcworld.com\/article\/2891148\/google-relaxes-mandatory-encryption-requirement-for-android-lollipop-devices.html\/RK=0\/RS=4MbznVcCDOJS.zSIKIixfQ_iiEU-\" title=\"Google relaxes mandatory encryption requirement for Android Lollipop devices\">Google relaxes mandatory encryption requirement for Android Lollipop devices<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Google has quietly backed away from a pledge that new Android devices running Lollipop would have full-disk encryption enabled by default. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-encryption"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29581"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29581\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}