Congress this week quietly passed a bill that may give unprecedented legal authority to the government's warrantless surveillance powers, despite a last-minute effort by Rep. Justin Amash to kill the bill. <\/p>\n
Amash staged an aggressive eleventh-hour rally Wednesday night to block passage of the Intelligence Authorization Act, which will fund intelligence agencies for the next fiscal year. The Michigan Republican sounded alarms over recently amended language in the package that he said will for the first time give congressional backing to a controversial Reagan-era decree granting broad surveillance authority to the president. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The 47-page intelligence bill was headed toward a voice vote when Amash rose to the House floor to ask for a roll call. Despite his effortswhich included a \"Dear Colleague\" letter sent to all members of the House urging a no votethe bill passed 325-100, with 55 Democrats and 45 Republicans opposing. <\/p>\n
The provision in question is \"one of the most egregious sections of law I've encountered during my time as a representative,\" Amash wrote on his Facebook page. The tea-party libertarian, who teamed up with Rep. John Conyers last year in an almost-successful bid to defund the National Security Agency in the wake of the Snowden revelations, warned that the provision \"grants the executive branch virtually unlimited access to the communications of every American.\" <\/p>\n
The measure already passed the Senate by unanimous consent on Tuesday, and it is now on its way to the White House, where President Obama is expected to sign it. <\/p>\n
The objections from Amash and others arose from language in the bill's Section 309, which includes a phrase to allow for \"the acquisition, retention, and dissemination\" of U.S. phone and Internet data. That passage, they warn, will give unprecedented statutory authority to allow for the surveillance of private communications that currently exists only under a decades-old presidential decree, known as Executive Order 12333. <\/p>\n
\"If this hadn't been snuck in, I doubt it would have passed,\" said Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat who voted against the bill. \"A lot of members were not even aware that this new provision had been inserted last-minute. Had we been given an additional day, we may have stopped it.\" <\/p>\n
A spokesman for the Senate Intelligence Committee pushed back on claims that the section will strengthen NSA surveillance authority. <\/p>\n
\"Nothing in Section 309 authorizes any intelligence collection\/acquisition at all,\" the spokesman said in an email.\"The only thing the section does is require new procedures governing the information the [intelligence community] already collects. The purpose of the section is to limit the [intelligence community's] existing ability to retain information, including U.S. person information.\" <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n