As a graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1996, Amit Sahai was fascinated by the strange notion of a zero-knowledge proof, a type of mathematical protocol for convincing someone that something is true without revealing any details of why it is true. As Sahai mulled over this counterintuitive concept, it led him to consider an even more daring notion: What if it were possible to mask the inner workings not just of a proof, but of a computer program, so that people could use the program without being able to figure out how it worked? <\/p>\n
The idea of obfuscating a program had been around for decades, but no one had ever developed a rigorous mathematical framework for the concept, let alone created an unassailable obfuscation scheme. Over the years, commercial software companies have engineered various techniques for garbling a computer program so that it will be harder to understand while still performing the same function. But hackers have defeated every attempt. At best, these commercial obfuscators offer a speed bump, said Sahai, now a computer science professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. An attacker might need a few days to unlock the secrets hidden in your software, instead of a few minutes. <\/p>\n
Secure program obfuscation would be useful for many applications, such as protecting software patches, obscuring the workings of the chips that read encrypted DVDs, or encrypting the software controlling military drones. More futuristically, it would allow people to create autonomous virtual agents that they could send out into the computing cloud to act on their behalf. If, for example, you were heading to a remote cabin in the woods for a vacation, you could create and then obfuscate a computer program that would inform your boss about emails you received from an important client, or alert your sister if your bank balance dropped too low. Your passwords and other secrets inside the program would be safe. <\/p>\n
You could send that agent into the computing wild, including onto untrusted computers, Sahai said. It could be captured by the enemy, interrogated, and disassembled, but it couldnt be forced to reveal your secrets. <\/p>\n
As Sahai pondered program obfuscation, however, he and several colleagues quickly realized that its potential far surpassed any specific applications. If a program obfuscator could be created, it could solve many of the problems that have driven cryptography for the past 40 years problems about how to conduct secure interactions with people at, say, the other end of an Internet connection, whom you may not know or trust. <\/p>\n
A program obfuscator would be a powerful tool for finding plausible constructions for just about any cryptographic task you could conceive of, said Yuval Ishai, of the Technion in Haifa, Israel. <\/p>\n
Precisely because of obfuscations power, many computer scientists, including Sahai and his colleagues, thought it was impossible. We were convinced it was too powerful to exist, he said. Their earliest research findings seemed to confirm this, showing that the most natural form of obfuscation is indeed impossible to achieve for all programs. <\/p>\n
Then, on July 20, 2013, Sahai and five co-authors posted a paper on the Cryptology ePrint Archive demonstrating a candidate protocol for a kind of obfuscation known as indistinguishability obfuscation. Two days later, Sahai and one of his co-authors, Brent Waters, of the University of Texas, Austin, posted a second paper that suggested, together with the first paper, that this somewhat arcane form of obfuscation may possess much of the power cryptographers have dreamed of. <\/p>\n
This is the first serious positive result when it comes to trying to find a universal obfuscator, said Boaz Barak, of Microsoft Research in Cambridge, Mass. The cryptography community is very excited. In the six months since the original paper was posted, more papers have appeared on the ePrint archive with obfuscation in the title than in the previous 17 years. <\/p>\n
However, the new obfuscation scheme is far from ready for commercial applications. The technique turns short, simple programs into giant, unwieldy albatrosses. And the schemes security rests on a new mathematical approach that has not yet been thoroughly vetted by the cryptography community. It has, however, already withstood the first attempts to break it. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n