{"id":25706,"date":"2014-08-28T07:42:14","date_gmt":"2014-08-28T11:42:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.opensource.im\/?p=25706"},"modified":"2014-08-28T07:42:14","modified_gmt":"2014-08-28T11:42:14","slug":"nsa-spying-faq-electronic-frontier-foundation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/nsa-spying\/nsa-spying-faq-electronic-frontier-foundation.php","title":{"rendered":"NSA Spying FAQ | Electronic Frontier Foundation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    FAQ on NSA Spying (General    Questions)  <\/p>\n<p>    What is the NSA domestic spying    program?  <\/p>\n<p>    In October 2001, President Bush issued a secret presidential    order authorizing the NSA to conduct a range of surveillance    activities inside of the United States without statutory    authorization or court approval, including electronic    surveillance of Americans telephone and Internet    communications. This program of surveillance continues through    today, although the legal justifications have changed over    time, and works with the major telecommunications and    Internet companies.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2005, after the New York Times broke the story of the    surveillance program, the President publicly admitted one    portion of itwarrantless surveillance of Americans believed to    be communicating with people connected with terrorism    suspectsSenior Bush Administration officials later confirmed    that the Presidents authorization went beyond the surveillance    of terrorists and conceded that the program did not comply with    the     Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The    President, invoking a theory of limitless executive power to    disregard the mandates of Congress, reauthorized this    warrantless surveillance more than thirty times, including    after the Department of Justice found the program to violate    criminal laws. President Obama has continued the program, but    with differing secret legal justifications. Obama has    given no public legal justification for it and, in some    situations, appears to be     strategically denying certain portions of it. For other    portions, including the collection of telecommunications    records, the Obama Administration said it could neither confirm    nor deny its actions until May, 2013, when the DNI finally    admitted additional portions of it. Members of Congress    have confirmed that additional domestic surveillance by the NSA    still remains a secret.  <\/p>\n<p>    Shortly after the initial revelations, a whistleblower named    Mark Klein came forward with evidence describing the specific    AT&T facilities, including one on Folsom Street in San    Francisco, where the handoff of customer communications is    occurring. Mr. Klein's evidence confirmed what was already    indicated by numerous newspaper reports and Congressional    admissionsthat the NSA is intercepting and analyzing millions    of ordinary Americans' communications off of the fiber optic    cables that carry our communications, with the help of the    country's largest phone and Internet companies. EFF has brought    two lawsuits to stop this illegal surveillance. In 2012, three    NSA whistleblowers     came forward to confirm Mr. Kleins evidence, as well as    other information about the warrantless surveillance.  <\/p>\n<p>    Today, the warrantless surveillance program started under Bush    remains largely intact under the Obama administration, and, in    June 2013, reports in the Guardian and Washington Post    confirmed key facts alleged in our cases, and provided    supporting documents.  <\/p>\n<p>    While the full legal justifications remain secret, the Obama    administration apparently uses strained interpretations of the    Patriot Act and FISA Amendments Act to try to justify the mass    collection of data on US persons, but the reality is the same    as it was under the Bush administration: these program are    illegal and unconstitutional.  <\/p>\n<p>    Click here for a complete overview of the NSA Domestic Spying    program.  <\/p>\n<p>    What do the cases claim about the    interception of domestic communications of millions of    Americans?  <\/p>\n<p>    The Jewel v. NSA case alleges that the government, in    coordination with AT&T, intercepts communications (like    phone calls and emails), and that AT&T illegally discloses    communications records to the government. The core component of    the surveillance is the government's     nationwide network of sophisticated communications    surveillance equipment, attached to the key facilities of    telecommunications companies such as AT&T that carry    Americans' Internet and telephone communications.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.eff.org\/nsa-spying\/faq\" title=\"NSA Spying FAQ | Electronic Frontier Foundation\">NSA Spying FAQ | Electronic Frontier Foundation<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> FAQ on NSA Spying (General Questions) What is the NSA domestic spying program? In October 2001, President Bush issued a secret presidential order authorizing the NSA to conduct a range of surveillance activities inside of the United States without statutory authorization or court approval, including electronic surveillance of Americans telephone and Internet communications<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25706","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nsa-spying"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25706"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25706"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25706\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}