WASHINGTON The Bureau of Prisons has rejected the Armys request to accept the transfer of national security leaker Pvt. Chelsea Manning from the military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, to a civilian facility where she could get better treatment for her gender-identify condition. The military will instead begin the initial treatment for her. <\/p>\n
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has approved the Armys recommendation to keep Manning in military custody and start a rudimentary level of gender treatment, a defense official said Thursday. The initial gender treatments could include allowing Manning to wear some female undergarments and also possibly provide some hormone treatments. <\/p>\n
SEE ALSO: Calif. gay pride event bans National Guard, honors Chelsea Manning <\/p>\n
The decision raises a number of questions about what level of treatment Manning will be able to get and at what point the private would have to be transferred from the all-male prison to a female facility. <\/p>\n
Manning has been diagnosed with gender dysphoria, the sense of being a woman in a mans body. Civilian prisons can provide treatment, and the Defense Department has argued repeatedly that it doesnt have the medical expertise needed. As a result, the Army tried to work out a plan to transfer Manning to a federal prison. <\/p>\n
Officials said Thursday that federal authorities refused the proposal. Officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly by name. <\/p>\n
Mannings lawyer, David Coombs, told The Associated Press on Thursday that he was encouraged that the Army will begin medical treatment. <\/p>\n
It has been almost a year since we first filed our request for adequate medical care, Coombs said. I am hopeful that when the Army says it will start a rudimentary level of treatment that this means hormone replacement therapy. <\/p>\n
If hormone therapy is not provided, he said he will have to take appropriate legal action to ensure Chelsea finally receives the medical treatment she deserves and is entitled to under the law. <\/p>\n
In May Coombs had also contended that civilian prisons were not as safe as military facilities. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n