{"id":24508,"date":"2014-07-03T11:41:52","date_gmt":"2014-07-03T15:41:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.opensource.im\/?p=24508"},"modified":"2014-07-03T11:41:52","modified_gmt":"2014-07-03T15:41:52","slug":"privacy-group-gives-nsa-spying-thumbs-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/nsa-spying\/privacy-group-gives-nsa-spying-thumbs-up.php","title":{"rendered":"Privacy group gives NSA spying thumbs-up"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Reuters    <\/p>\n<p>        EYES CLOSED: Anti-spying protesters outside the US        Department of Justice in Washington, DC.      <\/p>\n<p>    Endorsement of the NSA's internet surveillance programs by a    bipartisan privacy board has deeply disappointed civil    liberties activists while providing a measure of vindication    for beleaguered US intelligence officials.  <\/p>\n<p>    James Clapper, director of national intelligence, welcomed the    conclusion by the independent Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight    Board that the National Security Agency's internet    spying on foreign targets in the US has been legal, effective    and subject to rigorous oversight to protect the rights of    Americans.  <\/p>\n<p>    Activist groups panned the report as a dud.  <\/p>\n<p>    It was a dizzying turnabout for a privacy board that in January    drew criticism in the other direction for branding the NSA's    collection of domestic calling records unconstitutional.  <\/p>\n<p>    As they unanimously adopted their     190-page report, the five board members - all appointed    by President Barack Obama - sought to explain their largely    favourable conclusions about surveillance programs that have    provoked worldwide outrage since former NSA systems    administrator Edward Snowden revealed them last year.  <\/p>\n<p>    At issue is a spying regime, first definitively disclosed in    Snowden documents last year, under which the NSA is using court    orders to obtain foreign customers' emails, chats, videos and    texts from Google, Facebook and other US tech companies under a    program known as PRISM. The documents also showed that the    agency is intercepting foreign data as it transits fiber optic    lines in the US  <\/p>\n<p>    Yahoo, Apple, Microsoft, Twitter and Facebook did not    immediately respond to requests for comment. Google and    LinkedIn declined to comment.  <\/p>\n<p>    The reputations of American technology companies have suffered    abroad over the perception that they cannot protect customer    data from US spy agencies. Last week, the German government    said it would end a contract with Verizon over concerns about    network security.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Original post:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.stuff.co.nz\/technology\/digital-living\/60132011\/Privacy-group-gives-NSA-spying-thumbs-up\/RK=0\/RS=P_SRsdPD91U54j0jN_n7PIIyKdU-\" title=\"Privacy group gives NSA spying thumbs-up\">Privacy group gives NSA spying thumbs-up<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Reuters EYES CLOSED: Anti-spying protesters outside the US Department of Justice in Washington, DC. Endorsement of the NSA's internet surveillance programs by a bipartisan privacy board has deeply disappointed civil liberties activists while providing a measure of vindication for beleaguered US intelligence officials. James Clapper, director of national intelligence, welcomed the conclusion by the independent Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board that the National Security Agency's internet spying on foreign targets in the US has been legal, effective and subject to rigorous oversight to protect the rights of Americans<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nsa-spying"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24508"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24508"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24508\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}