{"id":24377,"date":"2014-06-28T05:41:32","date_gmt":"2014-06-28T09:41:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.opensource.im\/?p=24377"},"modified":"2014-06-28T05:41:32","modified_gmt":"2014-06-28T09:41:32","slug":"privacy-groups-release-congressional-scorecard-on-nsa-spying","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/nsa-spying\/privacy-groups-release-congressional-scorecard-on-nsa-spying.php","title":{"rendered":"Privacy Groups Release Congressional Scorecard on NSA Spying"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Dianne Feinstein gets an \"F.\" So does John Boehner.  <\/p>\n<p>    Patrick Leahy, Ron Wyden, and Justin Amash each earned an \"A.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    At least that's according to a new congressional scorecard from    privacy and civil-liberties groups measuring how lawmakers    stand on government spying, an issue that continues to slowly    gain traction more than a year after Edward Snowden's leaks    exposed classified bulk-data surveillance programs at the    National Security Agency.  <\/p>\n<p>    The scorecard,    developed by reddit, the Sunlight Foundation, Demand Progress    and others,grades lawmakers from \"A\" to \"F,\" depending on    their votes or sponsorship of certain pieces of recent    surveillance legislation. Its release coincides with the    liftoff of a Greenpeace blimp this morning that hovered above    the NSA's data center in Utah and displayed the message    \"Illegal spying below.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The letter grades are meant to add clarity to a muddled reform    process concerning the proper scope of government surveillance    of phone and Internet data, said Rainey Reitman, activist    director with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, one of the    organizing groups.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Congress has been struggling with what they're going to do    about surveillance reform, and for the general public, this has    been a very confusing debate,\" Reitman said. \"Because, often    there are going to be bills that imply they are going to help    with surveillance issues when, in fact, they are fake reforms    that would merely entrench the spying.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    In the House, points were awarded for support of the    Surveillance State Repeal Act, introduced last year by Rep.    Rush Holt (who gets an \"A\"), and the original USA Freedom Act,    which was authored by Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (also an \"A\") and    sought to end the NSA's bulk collection of U.S. phone metadata.  <\/p>\n<p>    But points were subtracted if a House member voted for the    \"watered-down\" version of the Freedom Act, which     passed the chamber 303-121 in May. Powerful tech companies    such as Google and Facebook and privacy advocates     dropped their support of that bill as eleventh-hour    negotiations among House leadership, intelligence officials,    and the White House altered the language of key sections of the    bill.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the Senate, points were awarded for sponsorship of the    original USA Freedom Act, introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy, and    points were deducted for cosponsorship of Sen. Dianne    Feinstein's FISA Improvements Act, which civil-liberties groups    have routinely lambasted as codifying the current powers of the    NSA and other intelligence agencies. Even Feinstein has    acknowledged that her bill likely does not have a path forward,    however.  <\/p>\n<p>    Several high-profile senators remain unranked in the scorecard    for not being \"significantly involved\" in the debate on NSA    spying. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Minority    Leader Mitch McConnell, and Republican Sens. Rand Paul, Ted    Cruz, and Marco Rubioa trio of potential GOP presidential    candidates in 2016are all listed with a question mark.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Visit link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nationaljournal.com\/tech\/privacy-groups-release-congressional-scorecard-on-nsa-spying-20140627\" title=\"Privacy Groups Release Congressional Scorecard on NSA Spying\">Privacy Groups Release Congressional Scorecard on NSA Spying<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Dianne Feinstein gets an \"F.\" So does John Boehner. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24377","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nsa-spying"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24377"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24377"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24377\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24377"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24377"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24377"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}