He wasn't just trying to spark democratic debate on surveillance. He also hoped his revelations would prompt programmers to build better encryption.<\/p>\n
Reuters <\/p>\n
A few pages into Glenn Greenwald's newly released book, <\/p>\n
My sole motive is to inform the public as to that which is done in their name,\" he reportedly wrote in a note to his collaborators, \"and that which is done against them.\" <\/p>\n
Actually, though, he had a second motive. Thomas Jefferson once wrote: \"In questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.\" Snowden wrote: <\/p>\n
While I pray that public awareness and debate will lead to reform, bear in mind that the policies of men change in time, and even the Constitution is subverted when the appetites of power demand it. In words from history: Let us speak no more of faith in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of cryptography. <\/p>\n
Even if most people had ignored Snowden, he might not have judged his own actions a total waste. After all, they might have inspired a single cryptographer to innovate. That could be hugely significant. <\/p>\n
The quote above isn't the only one that supports this analysis. Greenwald reproduces another paragraph that Snowden wrote to reporter and documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras early in their correspondence, characterizing it as \"the crux of what he viewed as his mission.\" Snowden wrote: <\/p>\n
The shock of this initial period [after the first revelations] will provide the support needed to build a more equal internet, but this will not work to the advantage of the average person unless science outpaces law. By understanding the mechanisms through which our privacy is violated, we can win here. We can guarantee for all people equal protection against unreasonable search through universal laws, but only if the technical community is willing to face the threat and commit to implementing over-engineered solutions. In the end, we must enforce a principle whereby the only way the powerful may enjoy privacy is when it is the same kind shared by the ordinary: one enforced by the laws of nature, rather than the policies of man. <\/p>\n
I may be forgetting about a statement or series of statements that Snowden made over the last year. But as best I can remember, these are the clearest passages that we have indicating a second primary motive. Snowden was trying to reach the masses to inform us and spark a debate that somehow reined in the NSA. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n