{"id":17333,"date":"2014-04-22T01:42:00","date_gmt":"2014-04-22T05:42:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.opensource.im\/?p=17333"},"modified":"2014-04-22T01:42:00","modified_gmt":"2014-04-22T05:42:00","slug":"ssd-survey-highlights-misconceptions-about-encryption-performance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/encryption\/ssd-survey-highlights-misconceptions-about-encryption-performance.php","title":{"rendered":"SSD Survey Highlights Misconceptions About Encryption &amp; Performance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    COLORADO SPRINGS, Co. -- A survey by the Storage Networking    Industry Association (SNIA) launched last fall has revealed    some interesting user perceptions regarding the characteristics    of solid state drives (SSDs), including their endurance    expectations and their lack of interest in using built-in    encryption features.  <\/p>\n<p>    Paul Wassenberg, chair of SNIAs Solid State Storage Initiative    (SSSI) said the results of the survey will be used to guide the    groups education activities around the capabilities and    features of SSDs. The call for input began last fall. Initial    results, comprising 75% of the ultimate total of participants,    were presented at the Storage Visions Conference earlier this year.  <\/p>\n<p>    The survey identified respondents in four market segments,    namely the mobile, desktop, server, and storage subsystem    segments. Within each segment, SSD uses were broken down based    on applications as well as interfaces being used. Overall, the    highest use of SSDs is in storage subsystems -- by    approximately 33%, with servers at roughly 27%, and mobile at    around 21%. Desktop use of SSDs was about 8%. The majority,    approximately 65%, were using the using the 2.5-inch form    factor, 19% were using PCIe cards, and less than 5% were using    mSATA. Capacity-wise, about 33% of respondents were using SSDs    greater than 500 GB, followed closely by about 31% using    between 301 and 500 GB.  <\/p>\n<p>    The SSSI survey focused on five key attributes of SSDs --    performance, power, endurance, data integrity, and data    encryption. While the ratings varied depending on the segment    and uses, across all segments performance was fairly important,    with IOPS and latency favored over throughput. Power was fairly    important, but power management received only middling ratings.  <\/p>\n<p>    Wassenberg said endurance was most important of all attributes    for users, who consistently ranked it above all else. Data    integrity and encryption were rated as fairly important, but    the latter less so than anticipated. Wassenberg said this was    notable, since comments from the survey revealed some outdated    data ideas that encryption can reduce performance. That isnt    true, he said, because recent generations of self-encrypting    drives (SEDs) do not measurably impact SSD performance.  <\/p>\n<p>    Key management is also a concern in larger systems with    multiple drives, the survey found. Wassenberg said mobile    devices, such as notebooks PCs, are particularly vulnerable to    theft, and encryption would prevent the data from being    accessed. Many SSDs being shipped today have data protection    and encryption features built in, but often those abilities are    not being switched on by OEMs.  <\/p>\n<p>    Samsung, for example, recently added new security features to    its self-encrypting drive (SED), the 840 EVO SSD, making it    compatible with professional security software employed by    enterprise organizations. In addition, there are a number of    third-party vendors such as WinMagic and Wave Systems that    offer tools to make SEDs easier for IT departments to deploy    and manage while not degrading the performance of SSDs and or    complicating the user experience.  <\/p>\n<p>    Wassenberg said educating users on encryption technologies for    SSDs and the benefits will be a focus for the SSSI going    forward. Another area of education will be performance, he said, and the    importance of preconditioning drives so that users have better    expectations of how a drive performs over time. An SSDs    performance is higher fresh out of the box, but it will drop    after several writes, and then give a more realistic indication    of how it will likely perform over time.  <\/p>\n<p>    The SSSI offers test specification, specifications and software that allow users    to test workloads and maintain industry-standard methodology    for pre-conditioning and steady state determination for SSDs.  <\/p>\n<p>    For now, the SSSI survey is going to be kept open for an    indefinite period to gather more data, and users are welcome to    participate in a dedicated LinkedIn group.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the article here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.eetimes.com\/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1322020&_mc=RSS_EET_EDT\/RS=^ADAXSKxVuATFKu1SFYW6883KHOD8RE-\" title=\"SSD Survey Highlights Misconceptions About Encryption &amp; Performance\">SSD Survey Highlights Misconceptions About Encryption &amp; Performance<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> COLORADO SPRINGS, Co. -- A survey by the Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA) launched last fall has revealed some interesting user perceptions regarding the characteristics of solid state drives (SSDs), including their endurance expectations and their lack of interest in using built-in encryption features. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17333","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-encryption"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17333"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17333"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17333\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}