{"id":16340,"date":"2014-04-17T06:41:15","date_gmt":"2014-04-17T10:41:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.opensource.im\/?p=16340"},"modified":"2014-04-17T06:41:15","modified_gmt":"2014-04-17T10:41:15","slug":"snowdens-email-provider-loses-appeal-over-encryption-keys","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/encryption\/snowdens-email-provider-loses-appeal-over-encryption-keys.php","title":{"rendered":"Snowden\u2019s Email Provider Loses Appeal Over Encryption Keys"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Lavabit founder Ladar Levison. Image: Gage      Skidmore\/Flickr    <\/p>\n<p>    A federal appeals court has upheld a contempt citation against    the founder of the defunct secure e-mail company Lavabit,    finding that the weighty internet privacy issues he raised on    appeal should have been brought up earlier in the legal    process.  <\/p>\n<p>    The     decision disposes of a closely watched privacy case on a    technicality, without ruling one way or the other on the    substantial issue: whether an internet company can be compelled    to turn over the master encryption keys for its entire system    to facilitate court-approved surveillance on a single user.  <\/p>\n<p>    The case began in June, when Texas-based Lavabit was served    with a pen register order requiring it to give the government a live feed of    the email activity on a particular account. The feed would    include metadata like the from and to lines on every    message, and the IP addresses used to access the mailbox.  <\/p>\n<p>    Because pen register orders provide only metadata, they can be    obtained without probable cause that the target has committed a    crime. But in this case the court filings suggest strongly that    the target was indicted NSA leaker Edward Snowden, Lavabits    most famous user.  <\/p>\n<p>    Levison resisted the order on the grounds that he couldnt    comply without reprogramming the elaborate encryption system    hed built to protect his users privacy. He eventually    relented and offered to gather up the email metadata and    transmit it to the government after 60 days. Later he offered    to engineer a faster solution. But by then, weeks had passed,    and the FBI was determined to get what it wanted directly and    in real time.  <\/p>\n<p>    So in July the government served Levison with a search warrant    striking at the Achilles heel of his system: the private SSL    key that would allow the FBI to decrypt traffic to and from the    site, and collect Snowdens metadata directly. The government    promised it wouldnt use the key to spy on Lavabits other    400,000 users, which the key would technically enable them to    do.  <\/p>\n<p>    Levison turned over the keys as a nearly illegible computer    printout in 4-point type. In early August, Hilton  who once    served on the top-secret FISA court  ordered Levison to    provide the keys instead in the industry-standard electronic    format, and began fining him $5,000 a day for noncompliance.  <\/p>\n<p>    After two days, Levison complied, but then immediately    shuttered Lavabit altogether.  <\/p>\n<p>    Levison appealed the contempt order to the 4th Circuit, and    civil rights groups, including the ACLU and the EFF, filed    briefs in support of his position.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.wired.com\/c\/35185\/f\/661370\/s\/396fec96\/sc\/1\/l\/0L0Swired0N0C20A140C0A40Clavabit0Eruling0C\/story01.htm\/RS=^ADAIM6Dt6kC.2vNr0gv0_uKSxVifgg-\" title=\"Snowden\u2019s Email Provider Loses Appeal Over Encryption Keys\">Snowden\u2019s Email Provider Loses Appeal Over Encryption Keys<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Lavabit founder Ladar Levison. Image: Gage Skidmore\/Flickr A federal appeals court has upheld a contempt citation against the founder of the defunct secure e-mail company Lavabit, finding that the weighty internet privacy issues he raised on appeal should have been brought up earlier in the legal process. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-encryption"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16340"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16340\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euvolution.com\/open-source-convergence\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}