America has a chance to bolster domestic chip manufacturing, research: Congress should seize it | TheHill – The Hill

Leaders in Congress are taking aim at an ambitious and urgent goal: reverse the decades-long trajectory of decline in the percentage of global chip manufacturing done in America, bolster flat federal investments in chip research, and keep our country on top in semiconductors, the brains of modern technology.

Congress should seize this opportunity. Doing so would strengthen Americas economy and national security, make U.S. supply chains more resilient, and improve our countrys response to future crises.

Two bipartisan bills, the CHIPS for America Act and the American Foundries Act, each call for bold federal investments in domestic semiconductor manufacturing incentives and research initiatives. Provisions from the bills were included as amendments in the Senate and House versions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which cleared their respective chambers last week and now await action by a conference committee to merge them into final legislation. Similar provisions were included in the HEALS Act, COVID-19 stimulus legislation introduced this week in the Senate.

The chip industry, so instrumental to Americas future, is also a part of our countrys proud past. Semiconductor technology was invented in America more than a half-century ago, and U.S. companies still lead the global market, accounting for nearly half the worlds total chip sales.

But U.S.-located chip manufacturing facilities, or fabs, now produce only 12 percent of the worlds semiconductors, down from 37 percent in 1990. Three-quarters of the worlds chip manufacturing is now concentrated in East Asia. And China is projected to have the single-largest share of production by 2030.

The biggest reason for the decline in chip manufacturing in the U.S. is both simple and fixable. While America ranks high in several criteria companies use to determine where to build fabs IP protection, access to talent, and more the price tag of a new fab is far higher in the U.S. than competing countries. This is largely because other governments offer aggressive incentives in the form of grants and tax credits, while the U.S. government does not.

If the federal government takes action now to close the manufacturing incentives gap, it can right the ship. Due to the ever-increasing demand for semiconductor-enabled products, global chip manufacturing is projected to increase by more than 50 percent in the next 10 years. For about half of this new manufacturing capacity, the fab location is still up for grabs.

One study found with substantial government incentives, close to 20 new major manufacturing facilities would be built in the U.S. over the next decade, a 27 percent increase over the 70 major commercial fabs in the U.S. currently.

Along with a robust domestic manufacturing presence, much of the U.S. semiconductor industrys continued success rests in its ability to out-innovate the competition through massive research investments.

Federal government investments in semiconductor research, however, have been flat as a share of GDP for decades. And federal research funding is just a small fraction of the R&D investments by U.S. semiconductor companies, which totaled nearly $40 billion in 2019. This is significant because federal research plays an essential role in complementing private investments to drive semiconductor innovation and develop the high-tech workforce needed to compete globally.

The benefits of the federal government investing substantially in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing and research would be three-fold.

First, it would grow the U.S. economy and strengthen our national security. Greater semiconductor innovation would spur advances in the technologies our economy and military rely on. It also would help ensure American leadership in the strategically important technologies of the future, including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, 5G/6G, and more. Federal manufacturing incentives would create tens of thousands of new American jobs. And a recent study found every dollar invested by the federal government in semiconductor research adds $16 to U.S. GDP.

Second, a stronger U.S. manufacturing presence would fortify Americas semiconductor supply chains. Uprooting the entire, highly complex global semiconductor supply chain would be impractical and counterproductive. But expanding U.S. chip manufacturing would make America less dependent on chips made overseas, especially for critical defense and infrastructure applications.

Third, these actions would facilitate our response to crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Semiconductors are key components in medical devices treating COVID-19 patients and other ailments and play an important role in medical research to discover new vaccines and cures. Maintaining U.S. leadership in this crucial industry and strengthening supply chain resiliency is essential to Americas post-pandemic future.

Federal investments in chip manufacturing and research will pay big dividends for our country. Congress should seize this strategic opportunity, grab the tiller, and help reinforce Americas global tech leadership, economic strength, and national security for decades to come.

John Neuffer is president and CEO of the Semiconductor Industry Association, which represents 95 percent of the U.S. semiconductor industry.

Read this article:
America has a chance to bolster domestic chip manufacturing, research: Congress should seize it | TheHill - The Hill

WastedLocker is customised crypto-ransomware, says Kaspersky researcher – iTWire

There has been a marked increase in use of the crypto-ransomware WastedLocker in the first six months of 2020, the Russian security firm Kaspersky claims, with the most recent use being against and wearable technology specialist Garmin.

The company said each criminal gang that used WastedLocker appeared to be rebuilding the source to suit its own ends and thus a targeted build was used against Garmin.

In a detailed technical analysis of the relatively new malware, Kaspersky researcher Fedor Sinitsyn said WastedLocker had a command line interface that allowed it to accept different arguments that controlled the way it operated.

One was a "p" switch that indicated priority and was used to direct the malware to encrypt a specified directory first and then add its name to an exclusion list to prevent it being processed a second time.

The malware also had an "f" switch that could be used to specify encryption of a single directory.

A third argument, specified by the use of "u" told the package to encrypt files on a specified network using the authentication afforded by the credentials provided.

A screenshot of the ransom note generated by WastedLocker. Courtesy Kaspersky

The use of the "r" switch would launch the following sequence of actions:

Sinitsyn said one more interesting feature of WastedLocker was the manner in which it bypassed the user account control feature in Windows; this allows someone who has ordinary user privileges to run code that requires admin privileges by clicking agree on a pop-up that the system generates when such an operation was attempted.

The malware noted the privileges it had when it was started and silently tried to elevate its privileges using a known bypass technique:

Sinitsyn also found that the encryption scheme used by the malware was a combination of the AES and RSA algorithms. "The search mask to choose which files will be encrypted, as well as the list of the ignored paths are set in the configuration of the malware," he noted.

He said tor each processed file, WastedLocker generated a unique 256-bit key and a 128-bit IV which would be used to encrypt the file content using the AES-256 algorithm in CBC mode.

"The implementation of file operations is worthy of note, as it employs file mapping for data access. It must have been an attempt by the criminals to maximise the trojans performance and/or avoid detection by security solutions," he theorised. "Each encrypted file will get a new additional extension: .garminwasted."

Sinitsyn discovered that the trojan implemented a way of integrity control as part of its file encryption routine, calculating an MD5 hash of the original content of each processed file, and using this hash to ensure the correctness of the procedure.

Additionally, WastedLocker used a publicly available reference implementation of an RSA algorithm named rsaref.

Go here to see the original:
WastedLocker is customised crypto-ransomware, says Kaspersky researcher - iTWire

Now More Than Ever We Should Take Advantage of the Transformational Benefits of AI and ML in Healthcare – Managed Healthcare Executive

As healthcare businesses transform for a post-COVID-19 era, they are embracing digital technologies as essential for outmaneuvering the uncertainty faced by businesses and as building blocks for driving more innovation. Maturing digital technologies such as social, mobile, analytics and cloud (SMAC); emerging technologies such as distributed ledger, artificial intelligence, extended reality and quantum computing (DARQ);and scientific advancements (e.g., CRISPR, materials science) are helping to make innovative breakthroughs a reality.

These technologies are also proving essential in supporting COVID-19 triage efforts. For example, hospitals in China are using artificial intelligence (AI) to scan lungs, which is reducing the burden on healthcare providers and enabling earlier intervention. Hospitals in the United States are also using AI to intercept individuals with COVID-19 symptoms from visiting patients in the hospital.

Because AI and machine learning (ML) definitions can often be confused, it may be best to start by defining our terms.

AI can be defined as a collection of different technologies that can be brought together to enable machines to act with what appears to be human-like levels of intelligence. AI provides the ability for technology to sense, comprehend, act and learn in a way that mimics human intelligence.

ML can be viewed as a subset of AI that provides software, machines and robots the ability to learn without static program instructions.

ML is currently being used across the health industry to generate personalized product recommendations to consumers, identify the root cause of quality problems and fix them, detect healthcare claims fraud, and discover and recommend treatment options to physicians. ML-enabled processes rely on software, systems, robots or other machines which use ML algorithms.

For the healthcare industry, AI and ML represent a set of inter-related technologiesthat allow machines to perform and help with both administrative and clinical healthcare functions. Unlike legacy technologies that are algorithm-based tools that complement a human, health-focused AI and ML today can truly augment human activity.

The full potential of AI is moving beyond mere automation of simple tasks into a powerful tool enabling collaboration between humans and machines. AI is presenting an opportunity to revolutionize healthcare jobs for the better.

Recent research indicates that in order to maximize the potential of AI and to be digital leaders, healthcare organizations must re-imagine and re-invent their processes and create self-adapting, self-optimizing living processes that use ML algorithms and real-time data to continuously improve.

In fact, theres consensus among healthcare organizations hat ML-enabled processes help achieve previously hidden or unobtainable value, and that these processes are finding solutions to previously unsolved business problems.

Despite these key findings, additional research surprisingly finds that only 39% of healthcare organizations report that they have inclusive design or human-centric design principles in place to support human-machine collaboration. Machines themselves will become agents of process change, unlocking new roles and new ways for humans and machines to work together.

In order to tap into the unique strengths of AI, healthcare businesses will need to rely on their peoples talent and ability to steward, direct, and refine the technology. Advances in natural language processing and computer vision can help machines and people collaborate and understand one another and their surroundings more effectively. It will be vital to prioritize explainability to help organizations ensure that people understand AI.

Powerful AI capabilities are already delivering profound results across other industries such as retail and automotive. Healthcare organizations now have an opportunity to integrate the new skills needed to enable fluid interactions between human and machines and adapt to the workforce models needed to support these new forms of collaboration.

By embracing the growing adoption of AI, healthcare organizations will soon see the potential benefits and value of AI such as organizational and workflow improvements that can unleash improvements in cost, quality and access. Growth in the AI health market is expected to reach $6.6 billion by 2021 thats a compound annual growth rate of 40%. In just the next couple of years,the health AI market will grow more than 10 times.

AI generally, and ML specifically, gives us technology that can finally perform specialized nonroutine tasks as it learns for itself without explicit human programing shifting nonclinical judgment tasks away from healthcare enterprise workers.

What will be key to the success of healthcare organizations leveraging AI and ML across every process, piece of data and worker? When AI and ML are effectively added to the operational picture, we will see healthcare systems where machines will take on simple, repetitive tasks so that humans can collaborate on a larger scale and work at a higher cognitive level. AI and ML can foster a powerful combination of strategy, technology and the future of work that will improve both labor productivity and patient care.

Brian Kalis is a managing director of digital health and innovation for Accenture's health business.

See the article here:
Now More Than Ever We Should Take Advantage of the Transformational Benefits of AI and ML in Healthcare - Managed Healthcare Executive

Artificial Intelligence and Satellite Technology to Enhance Carbon Tracking Measures – JD Supra

New carbon emission tracking technology will quantify emissions of greenhouse gas, holding the energy industry accountable for its CO2 output. Backed by Google, this cutting-edge initiative will be known as Climate TRACE (Tracking Real-Time Atmospheric Carbon Emissions).

Advanced AI and machine learning now make it possible to trace greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from factories, power plants and more. By using image processing algorithms to detect carbon emissions from power plants, AI technology makes use of the growing global satellite network to develop a more comprehensive global database of power plant activity. Because most countries self-report emissions and manually compile results, scientists often rely on data that is several years out of date. Moreover, companies often underreport carbon emissions, rendering existing data inaccurate.

Climate TRACE addresses these issues by partnering with other leaders in sustainability practicesincluding former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, WattTime, CarbonPlan, Carbon Tracker, Earthrise Alliance, Hudson Carbon, OceanMind, Rocky Mountain Institute, Blue Sky Analytics and Hypervine. The Climate TRACE coalition aims to help countries in meeting Paris Agreement targets and place the world on a path to sustainability.

The carbon tracking efforts of Climate TRACE will result in a conglomeration of data to be made available to the public, which may assist plaintiffs in climate liability cases and lead to enhanced enforcement of environmental laws. The slow pace of international climate negotiations has led to an increase in lawsuits demanding action on global warming. As of this year, 1,600 climate-related lawsuits have been filed worldwide, including 1,200 lawsuits in the United States alone. Currently, climate liability cases rely predominantly on a database run by the Carbon Disclosure Project and the Climate Accountability Institute. This database, initially released in 2013 as the Carbon Majors Report, attempts to link carbon pollution to emitters. The 2013 report pinpointed 100 producers responsible for 71% of global industrial GHG emissions. Its 2017 report, for instance, indicated that 25 corporate and state producing entities account for 51% of global industrial GHG emissions. While the Carbon Majors Report has assisted in determining the largest carbon emitters on a global scale, Climate TRACE will provide more frequent and accurate monitoring of pollutants.

Data from Climate TRACE will also help hold countries accountable to the Paris Climate Agreement, expanding upon European efforts to monitor global warming. Early last year, a space budget increase put Europe in the lead to monitor carbon from space using satellite technology. In December 2019, member governments awarded the European Space Agency $12.5 billion. This substantial increase allowed the ESA to devote $1.8 billion to Copernicus, a satellite technology program which continuously tracks Earths atmosphere. The program allowed Europe to analyze human carbon emissions regularly. With Copernicus, the ESA became the only space agency to monitor pledges made under the Paris Climate Agreement. The Climate TRACE coalitionwith members spanning across three continentswill make carbon monitoring a global effort.

Climate TRACE has created a working prototype that is currently in its developmental stages. The coalition intends to release its first version of the AI project by the summer of 2021.

[View source.]

The rest is here:
Artificial Intelligence and Satellite Technology to Enhance Carbon Tracking Measures - JD Supra

Postdoctoral Research Associate in Artificial Intelligence job with DURHAM UNIVERSITY | 215559 – Times Higher Education (THE)

The Role

Applications are invited for a PDRA post in Artificial Intelligence.

1. Work closely with multi-national consumer goods corporation to identify short-list of applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in data mining, image processing, knowledge gathering etc. and to identify a short-list of projects that would benefit from AI methods.

2. For projects on the short-list, to deeper dive into the projects in order to define deliverables, what data is needed, milestones, etc. Deliverables could include a finished working model, successful proof of principle and a clear path forward, or a detailed assessment of why the proof of principle was not successful together with recommendations on how to address the problem in the future.

3. Over the course of the project duration, to undertake at least three R&D projects at Durham and to present a monthly updates to the relevant project teams at the corporation.

4. To hold a final workshop session at the corporation summarising and presenting the R&D work.

Read more here:
Postdoctoral Research Associate in Artificial Intelligence job with DURHAM UNIVERSITY | 215559 - Times Higher Education (THE)

San Antonio GOP Congressman Will Hurd Reaches Across the Aisle on Artificial Intelligence – San Antonio Current

While there's plenty to be critical about when it comes to retiring U.S. Rep. Will Hurd his records on the environment and health care, for example it's a fair bet at least some of his constituents will miss his bipartisanship.

After all, the San Antonio-area Republican co-wonAlleghenyCollege's 2018Prize for Civility in Public Life for his 30-hour "bipartisan road trip" with Beto O'Rourke, back when when the latter was just another Texas congressman and not yet a Democratic superstar.

Apparently, even in the waning months of his term, Hurd has kept up that spirit of reaching across the aisle.

The former CIA intelligence officer recentlyworked with U.S. Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Illinois, to author a detailed report on how to keep the U.S. from falling behind China on artificial intelligence. That's important, the pair argue, because AI has big implications for defense and national security.

Among the two House members' suggestions: getting the federal government to devote more money to deploying safe AI and cutting off Chinas access to AI-specific microchips.

The techie bible Wired Magazine was impressed enough with the pair's work that it devoted some serious real estate to letting them delve into their plan. Turns out Hurd and Kelly are alsodrafting a congressional resolution on their AI concerns and plan to introduce similar legislation.

Some of that I hope we get done in this Congress, and others can be taken and run with in the next Congress, Hurd told the mag.

Stay on top of San Antonio news and views. Sign up for our Weekly Headlines Newsletter.

Continue reading here:
San Antonio GOP Congressman Will Hurd Reaches Across the Aisle on Artificial Intelligence - San Antonio Current

Industry News: Artificial intelligence finds patterns of mutations and survival in tumor images – SelectScience

AI applied to tumor microscopy images detects patterns of 167 different mutations and predicts patient survival in 28 cancer types

Researchers at EMBLs European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), the Wellcome Sanger Institute, Addenbrookes Hospital in Cambridge, UK, and collaborators have developed an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that uses computer vision to analyze tissue samples from cancer patients. They have shown that the algorithm can distinguish between healthy and cancerous tissues, and can also identify patterns of more than 160 DNA and thousands of RNA changes in tumors. The study, published in Nature Cancer, highlights the potential of AI for improving cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

Cancer diagnosis and prognosis are largely based on two main approaches. In one, histopathologists examine the appearance of cancer tissue under the microscope. In the other, cancer geneticists, analyze the changes that occur in the genetic code of cancer cells. Both approaches are essential to understand and treat cancer, but they are rarely used together.

Clinicians use microscopy slides for cancer diagnosis all the time. However, the full potential of these slides hasnt been unlocked yet. As computer vision advances, we can analyze digital images of these slides to understand what happens at a molecular level, says Yu Fu, Postdoctoral Fellow in the Gerstung Group at EMBL-EBI.

Computer vision algorithms are a form of artificial intelligence that can recognize certain features in images. Fu and colleagues repurposed such an algorithm developed by Google originally used to classify everyday objects such as lemons, sunglasses and radiators to distinguish various cancer types from healthy tissue. They showed that this algorithm can also be used to predict survival and even patterns of DNA and RNA changes from images of tumor tissue.

Teaching algorithms to detect molecular changes

Previous studies have used similar methods to analyze images from single or a few cancer types with selected molecular alterations. However, Fu and colleagues generalized the approach on an unprecedented scale: they trained the algorithm with more than 17 000 images from 28 cancer types collected for The Cancer Genome Atlas, and studied all known genomic alterations.

What is quite remarkable is that our algorithm can automatically link the histological appearance of almost any tumor with a very broad set of molecular characteristics, and with patient survival, explains Moritz Gerstung, Group Leader at EMBL-EBI.

Overall, their algorithm was capable of detecting patterns of 167 different mutations and thousands of gene activity changes. These findings show in detail how genetic mutations alter the appearance of tumor cells and tissues.

Another research group has independently validated these results with a similar AI algorithm applied to images from eight cancer types. Their study was published in the same issue of Nature Cancer.

A potential tool for personalized medicine

The integration of molecular and histopathological data provides a clearer picture of a tumors profile. Detecting the molecular features, cell composition, and survival associated with individual tumors would help clinicians tailor appropriate treatments to their patients needs.

From a clinicians point of view, these findings are incredibly exciting. Our work shows how artificial intelligence could be used in clinical practice, explains Luiza Moore, Clinician Scientist and Pathologist at the Wellcome Sanger Institute and Addenbrookes Hospital. While the number of cancer cases is increasing worldwide, the number of pathologists is declining. At the same time, we strive to move away from the one size fits all approach and into personalized medicine. A combination of digital pathology and artificial intelligence can potentially alleviate those pressures and enhance our practice and patient care.

Sequencing technologies have propelled genomics to the forefront of cancer research, yet these technologies remain inaccessible to most clinics around the world. A possible alternative to direct sequencing would be to use AI to emulate a genomic analysis using data that is cheaper to collect, like microscopy slides.

Getting all that information from standard tumor images in a completely automatic manner is revolutionary, says Alexander Jung, PhD student at EMBL-EBI. This study shows what might be possible in the coming years, but these algorithms will have to be refined before clinical implementation.

Source article:

FU, Y., et al. (2020). Pan-cancer computational histopathology reveals mutations, tumor composition and prognosis, Nature Cancer. Published online 27 07; DOI: 10.1038/s43018-020-0085-8

For more of the latest science news, straight to your inbox, become a member of SelectScience for free today>>

Read this article:
Industry News: Artificial intelligence finds patterns of mutations and survival in tumor images - SelectScience

New podcast: What did those Big Tech hearings have to do with religious life in America? – GetReligion

Like I said, there have been more consequential clashes between the Big Tech czars and religious believers, but that one was symbolic.

The key is that faith is part of daily life, for millions of folks. These days, social media software has a massive impact on how people live their lives. Thus, Big Tech is a powerful force in the lives of believers and their families. Thats why Crossroads host Todd Wilken and I talked about this weeks Big Tech Congressional hearings, during this weeks podcast (click here to tune that in).

So what were these hearings all about? Apparently, the answer to that question depended on ones political ties. As I wrote the other day:

Democrats have their own reasons to be concerned about Big Tech, whose clout in the lives of modern Americans make the railroad tycoons of the Gilded Age look like minor-league players. These companies, after all, resemble digital public utilities more than mere Fortune 500 powerhouses.

Meanwhile, you know that at some point Republicans are going to roll out a long list of cases of viewpoint discrimination against cultural, moral, religious and oh yeah political conservatives.

So what happened, when the mainstream press covered the Hill showdown with the glowing digital images of Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg, Googles Sundar Pichai, Apples Tim Cook and Jeff Bezos of Amazon and The Washington Post?

All four of those men have a major impact on what is news and what is not news. However, Bezos spending some pocket change, as the richest man in the world did buy the The Washington Post a few years ago.

So lets start with his newspapers coverage, which ran online with this headline: Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google grilled on Capitol Hill over their market power. Heres the overture:

The leaders of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google took a brutal political lashing as Democrats and Republicans confronted the executives for wielding their market power to crush competitors and amass data, customers and sky-high profits.

Therare interrogationplayed out over the course of a nearly six-hour hearing, with lawmakers on the Houses top antitrust subcommittee coming armed withmillions of documents, hundreds of hours of interviews and in some cases the once-private messages of Silicon Valleys elite chiefs. They said it showed some in the tech sector had become too big and powerful, threatening rivals, consumers and, in some cases, even democracy itself.

Our founders would not bow before a king. Nor should we bow before the emperors of the online economy, said Rep. David N. Cicilline (D-R.I.).

The key words there are market and economy.

The entire story focuses on the concerns that Democrats, and many Republicans, have about the impact that the Big Tech superpowers have on their alleged competitors in a free market.

What about their impact on Americas marketplace of ideas? Do the disciples of these men tend to tilt the scales when it comes to deciding who gets to speak, and who doesnt, on their platforms? Isnt that topic half of this story, if one looks at it from the point of view of people who USE these platforms?

Post readers had to go 581 words into this piece to find this digital crust of bread:

Republicans, meanwhile, largely used their time during the hearing to attack some tech companies forengaging in perceived political censorshipagainst conservatives, a charge that the industry vehemently denies.

We all think the free market is great. We think competition is great. We love the fact that these are American companies, said Rep. Jim Jordan (Ohio), the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee. But whats not great is censoring people, censoring conservators and trying to impact elections. And if it doesnt end, there has to be consequences.

Go here to read the rest:

New podcast: What did those Big Tech hearings have to do with religious life in America? - GetReligion

A Turkish Women’s Rights Activist Explains the Importance of the ‘Challenge Accepted’ Campaign to Stop Femicide – Global Citizen

Women march in support of the Istanbul Convention on preventing violence against women, in Istanbul, July 19, 2020. The placard reads in Turkish: 6284 and the Istanbul Convention will be implemented. Omer Kuscu/AP

Why Global Citizens Should Care

Editors note: This story contains details of violence.

Protests across Turkey and a viral social media campaign in recent weeks have highlighted the rise of femicide the murder of a woman because of her gender and domestic violence in the country.

Pinar Gltekin, a 27-year-old Turkish woman, went missing and was found dead on July 21 in the city of Mugla. After Gltekin allegedly rejected her boyfriend Cemal Metin Avcis advances, he strangled her to death, burned her body in an oil barrel, and tried to hide it in the woods. The killing marked the 50th known murder of women in Turkey in 2020 alone and sparked outrage across the country. Womens rights advocates and allies are urging the Turkish government to take action to prevent these deaths.

According to a 2009 study, 42% of Turkish women between the ages of 15 and 60 had suffered some physical or sexual violence by their husbands or partners. In 2019, 474 women were murdered, mostly by partners and relatives.

Gender-based violence is only expected to surge in 2020. Domestic violence and femicide have spiked due to lockdown measures to help stop the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, Suad Abu-Dayyeh, Equality Now's Middle East and North Africa expert, told Global Citizen via email.

Protesters demanding justice for Gltekin and other murdered women were met with violent crackdowns by police and little commitment from the government to protect women. The demonstrators called on the government to uphold the Istanbul Convention, the first international binding agreement to prevent gender-based violence introduced in 2011, which few countries have enforced.

Women also turned to social media to raise awareness for the growing gender-based violence in Turkey. They relaunched the Challenge Accepted campaign using #kadnaiddetehayr and #istanbulszlemesiyaatr, which roughly translates to Say no to violence against women (kadna iddete hayr) and Enforce the Istanbul Convention (Istanbul szlemesi yaatr).

Related Stories July 8, 2020 Child Marriage Is on the Rise in Turkey as Syrian Refugees Struggle During COVID-19

Originally created in 2016, the campaign started out to increase cancer awareness and has had many iterations since. Turkish women drew from the concept and posted black-and-white photos of themselves online to signify they could be the next to appear in a newspaper as a femicide victim. Women around the world joined in to use the hashtag as a symbol of female empowerment around the world but received some criticism for drowning out Turkish womens voices. The campaign continues to bring more global attention to the issue of femicide in Turkey.

Global Citizen spoke with Nihan Damarli, a volunteer at the Turkey-based Foundation for Women's Solidarity via email about the recent protests, spikes in femicide, and the Challenge Accepted campaign. Read the full interview below.

Global Citizen: The murder of Pinar Gltekin sparked protests across Turkey, but the demonstrations were met with violent crackdowns by police. How did this represent the general treatment of women who stand up against gender-based violence in Turkey?

Damarli: The government in Turkey has increased oppressive and prohibitive policies, especially in the last few years, and wants to prevent opposition groups from coming together and especially being seen on the streets. They aim to silence dissident voices from every segment of society; thus, target the womens movement, being Turkeys most powerful rights-based movement.

Actions such as shutting down some womens organizations via statutory decrees, closing womens centers and shelters, banning of the International Womens Day marches in Istanbul, and tear-gassing protestors were only some of the indicators of this. In this incident, what we saw was that instead of stopping perpetrators and protecting women who have been subjected to violence, the police took action to stop women who are protesting femicides.

Overall, there is a lack of government collaboration with independent womens organizations in policy-making. Especially in the last few years, this lack of political will has turned into systematic steps against gender equality. Crashing the protests against Pnar Gltekins murder did not conflict with this general atmosphere.

Related Stories Nov. 22, 2016 CHIME FOR CHANGE Turkey Withdraws Controversial Child Rape Bill After Protests

Why is femicide on the rise in Turkey?

Unfortunately, each year, more women are murdered by their intimate partners or family members. We do not have the exact numbers since the Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Interior, and the Ministry of Family, Labour, and Social Services do not keep and/or share such statistics.

On the one hand, while women are becoming more and more conscious and want to take control of their own lives, laws to protect women and prevent violence are not effectively implemented. We see that many women who were murdered were killed when they took concrete steps to move away from violent men. In cases of violence, impunity encourages perpetrators.

The government does not show an integrated approach and a political will with regards to the implementation of policies for combating gender-based violence. Instead, political leaders almost legitimize gender-based discrimination and violence via their discriminative and sexist discourses. I believe that all these factors not only prevent the mentality transformation towards gender equality, but they also increase gender-based violence.

#Kadnaiddetehayr and #Istanbulszlemesiyaatr went viral, and quickly picked up steam with women around the world participating in the Challenge Accepted campaign. Some people argued that the connection to violence against women in Turkey was lost when the campaign grew in popularity. What do you think of this campaign as a way to draw attention to gender-based violence in Turkey?

Social media is a medium where content and agenda changes very fast. The campaign has spread very rapidly and even surpassed the borders of Turkey. I think sometimes it might be inevitable to lose some meaning while standing out among a lot of content on social media. There were also a lot of explanatory texts in circulation to remind the context of the campaign.

I think the focus of the campaign and the reason for sharing black-and-white photos are actually very striking and reflect the emotional state of women in Turkey directly. Due to the increasing violence, women now live with the fact that they may be exposed to gender-based violence, and moreover, that they can be killed. However, women no longer accept this fact as their unchangeable fate and try to raise their voices in every environment they can find in these oppressive times.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoan posted on Twitter about Pinars murder but has done very little to implement the Istanbul Convention even though Turkey was the first to ratify the treaty. How would you like to see him and the government take a stand against gender-based violence in the country?

Even though womens and LGBTI+ organizations, networks, and platforms have been very effective in the past to push for womens rights, the government is not currently welcoming collaboration and dialogue with independent rights-based organizations. What we, as womens and LGBTI+ organizations that are active in the field of combating gender-based violence, expect from political leaders is not tweets on social media after a woman is murdered, but actual political will to effectively implement protective and preventive policies. The shadow NGO reports of the Istanbul Convention Monitoring Platform (consisting of womens and LGBTI+ organizations) and the GREVIO country evaluation report show exactly what should be done step by step. However, while our advocacy efforts are for the effective implementation of the Istanbul Convention, the government is discussing withdrawal from the convention. We want the government to hear womens voices, and take womens and LGBTI+ organizations words into account while making decisions on womens lives.

This interview has been edited and condensed for length and clarity.

Original post:

A Turkish Women's Rights Activist Explains the Importance of the 'Challenge Accepted' Campaign to Stop Femicide - Global Citizen

How 9/11 and the US Civil War provided the framework for federal agents in Portland – News@Northeastern

Federal agents have begun to withdraw from Portland, Oregon, where they were stationed to protect federal property and personnel amid protests in the city, despite objection by local leaders. But, their authority to be there in the first place has deep roots.

Legislation passed just after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11 designed to protect the U.S. from national security threats; and judicial expansion just after the Civil War designed to ensure southern states adhered to Reconstruction-era laws provide the framework for what we see today, says Northeastern law professor Michael Meltsner.

Michael Meltsner is the George J. and Kathleen Waters Matthews distinguished university professor of law in the Northeastern University School of Law. Photo by Matthew Modoono/Northeastern University

Federal presence in Portland is both authorized and problematic, says Meltsner, who is the George J. and Kathleen Waters Matthews Distinguished University Professor of Law.

Authorities in the Trump administration say that the federal agents, who were deployed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security earlier this month, are in Portland to protect federal property and personnel. The federal force is composed of officers from Customs and Border Protection, the Transportation Security Administration, the Coast Guard, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement who back up the Federal Protective Service, which is already responsible for protecting federal property, according to The New York Times.

On July 29, Oregon Gov. Kate Brown announced that the forces would begin withdrawing from the state beginning July 30.

The federal agents arrived after weeks of protests in the city against racial injusticeprotests that had already been met with aggressive tactics from local police that were criticized by local officials including the governor, speaker of the Oregon House of Representatives, and some city councilors.

President Donald J. Trump has also threatened to send as many as 75,000 federal agents to other U.S. cities to quell protests there as well, even as local authorities in Portland, including Brown and Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler, have implored the agency to stand down, and the Oregon attorney general and the American Civil Liberties Union, a civil rights group, have sued.

But federal officials say they have clear authority. Representatives from Customs and Border Protection cited a section of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, legislation passed after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.

The act gives the U.S. secretary of Homeland Security the authority to protect the buildings, grounds, and property that are owned, occupied, or secured by the federal government and the persons on the property. The law was designed to protect the U.S. national security threats such as those perpetrated on 9/11, Meltsner says.

The agents in Oregon were there ostensibly, then, to protect federal propertyincluding the federal courthouse in downtown Portlandfrom protesters, he says.

To the extent that this is all they were doing, it would seem non-controversial, Meltsner says.

But news media reports from the city show what appear to be plain-clothes federal agents forcing protesters into unmarked vans.

If that were the case, Meltsner says, the agents would be in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects U.S. citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures.

In that case, just because federal agents have nominal authority under a federal statute, it doesnt mean that they can violate peoples constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment, Meltsner says. From what Ive read in the papers, it would appear that these federal agents are interfering with the liberty of the people without any cause.

A state official could decide to take a federal agent to court over an alleged violation. Often, however, such cases are not tried in a state courthouse, theyre removed to the federal court system to be triedor, as is often the case, dismissedthere, Meltsner says.

This act of removal is a judicial power that was created during the Reconstruction period in the U.S., roughly 1863 to 1875. During the years after the Civil War, progressive congressmen passed legislation that would ensure the rights of formerly enslaved people in the countryincluding the passage of the Fourteenth Amendmentand sent federal agents to various Southern states to enforce that legislation.

White officials in those Southern states, reluctant to apply the new legislation to formerly enslaved people in their states, tried to find ways to prosecute the federal agents enforcing the laws, Meltsner says. In order to protect the agents and the rights of Black people, Congress allowed cases that had begun in state courts to be taken out of them and tried in federal courts, where they were often dismissed, he says.

Now, Meltsner says, the same tactics may be used to protect the federal agents allegedly acting unlawfully in Oregon.

Basically, whats happening in Portland now could ultimately involve the same tactics used by the Justice Department to protect these federal agents during Reconstruction and the Civil Rights movement, Meltsner says.

And, he adds, although the focus on federal intervention in the city is warranted, its just as important to examine the behavior of the city and state police before federal agents arrived.

Based on the news reports, it would appear that there was an incredible amount of First Amendment and Fourth Amendment violation from the Portland Police Department, Meltsner says. This is certainly an evolving situation, with a lot of questions to be answered about what, exactly, is going on.

For media inquiries, please contact Jessica Hair at j.hair@northeastern.edu or 617-373-5718.

Read the rest here:

How 9/11 and the US Civil War provided the framework for federal agents in Portland - News@Northeastern